DOCSLIB.ORG

The English Building Industry in Late Modernity: an Empirical Investigation of the Definition, Construction and Meaning of Profession

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The English Building Industry in Late Modernity: an Empirical Investigation of the Definition, Construction and Meaning of Profession THE ENGLISH BUILDING INDUSTRY IN LATE MODERNITY: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DEFINITION, CONSTRUCTION AND MEANING OF PROFESSION Timothy Stephen Eccles Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London School of Economics and Political Science 2009 1 UMI Number: U615682 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615682 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 lueses qo&s"f* ix.oia&2_ TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 6 Acknowledgements 7 Abbreviations 7 Chapter 1: Definitions 8 1.0 Introduction: Purpose and Boundaries of the Study 8 1.0.1 Selection of Professions 10 1.0.2 The Building Industry 12 1.0.3 Late Modernity 14 1.1 The Research Paradigm 16 1.2 Methodology 18 1.2.1 Individual Professionals 25 1.2.2 Professional Associations 26 1.2.3 The Professional Firm 27 1.3 Structure of the Thesis 29 1.4 Conclusions 31 Chapter 2: A Selected Literature Review 33 2.0 Introduction 33 2.1 Functionalism: what is a profession? 33 2.2 Functionalism and Semi-Professionalism 39 2.3 Functionalism: Conclusions 40 2.4 Political Influence of Professions 40 2.5 Professions and Power: Professions, Economic Elites and the State 42 2.6 Professions, the Market and Class Relations 44 2.7 Division of Expert Labour: Jurisdiction 48 2.8 Comparative Approaches to Profession 50 2.9 The Professions within Business and Sociology for Business 52 2.10 Professions and Organisational Theory 58 2.11 Conclusions 60 Chapter 3: The Building Professions 64 3.0 Introduction 64 3.1 History and the Building Professions 64 3.2 Origins of the Building Professions 68 3.3 Consolidation of the Professions within the Building Industry 79 3.4 Decline of the Professions within the Building Industry 82 3.5 Wider Considerations of Decline 89 3.6 Conclusions 91 2 Chapter 4: Professional Associations 93 4.0 Introduction 93 4.1 The Future Professional Association 95 4.1.1 Running a Professional Association 95 4.1.2 Education and Training of Professionals 102 4.1.3 Continuing Professional Development 103 4.1.4 Maintaining Standards and Quality 103 4.1.5 Strategic Direction for Professional Associations 106 4.1.6 Conclusions 108 4.2 The System of Professional Organisation 109 4.2.1 The Study Association 109 4.2.2 The Qualifying Association 110 4.2.3 Trade Associations 110 4.3 Conclusions 112 Chapter 5: The Control of Admission and Training 115 5.0 Introduction 115 5.1 Controlling Admission 120 5.2 Why ‘control’ admission? 123 5.3 Control and Quality 127 5.4 What is being controlled? 133 5.5 Worth of the Professional Qualification 137 5.6 On what basis should control be administered? 140 5.7 Why Control Training? 142 5.8 Who Controls Training? 146 5.9 Constructing Competence 150 5.10 Published Sensemaking: RICS Educational Reviews 155 5.10.1 Wells Report 155 5.10.2 Eve Report 156 5.10.3 Review of Educational Policy (Brett-Jones Report) 156 5.10.4 Marketing Surveying Education 157 5.10.5 Agenda for Change 157 5.10.6 Investing in Futures 158 5.10.7 And so? 159 5.11 The Construction of Control of the Architect: Registration, ARB and RIBA 160 5.12 Conclusions 165 Chapter 6: Define and Defend a Jurisdiction 168 6.0 Introduction 168 6.1 How to Define a Jurisdiction? 168 6.2 Who Defines a Jurisdiction? 175 6.2.1 Royal Charter 176 3 6.2.2 Statute 177 6.2.3 Association and Identity 179 6.3 The Corporate Creation of a Jurisdiction: What is a Jurisdiction? 180 6.4 Defending the Jurisdiction 183 6.5 The Case of Architecture 189 6.6 The Case of Surveying 193 6.6.1 Quantity Surveying as a Professional Jurisdiction: the Formal Route 195 6.6.2 Building Surveying versus Engineering as a Discipline 203 6.7 Conclusions 207 Chapter 7: Regulate Each Other’s Behaviour 211 7.0 Introduction 211 7.1 Peer Regulation: ‘each other’ 212 7.2 Executive Regulation: Non-Peers versus Peers 215 7.3 Executive Regulation: Strategic Decoupling 218 7.4 Third Party (State) Regulation: ARB 225 7.5 RICS Engagement and Approved Decoupling 228 7.6 Competency Enforcement: Losing Members versus Control 232 7.7 Conclusions 233 Chapter 8: Defend and Enhance Corporate Status 236 8.0 Introduction 236 8.1 Modem 237 8.2 Commercialisation 240 8.3 Playing with the ‘Big Boys’ 240 8.4 Member Sensemaking of Self-status 242 8.4.1 By Report 242 8.4.2 Respondents . 244 8.5 Organisational Sensemaking: Case of RICS 254 8.5.1 Surveyors and their Future 254 8.5.2 Surveying in the Eighties 256 8.5.3 Cubbon Report 256 8.5.4 Structure and Designations Review 257 8.5.5 Agenda for Change 257 8.5.6 The New RICS (The Harris Report) 258 8.5.7 The Brooke review 259 8.5.8 Carsberg review 260 8.6 Executive Sensemaking 260 8.7 RIBA and Status 263 8.8 Conclusions 265 Chapter 9: Conclusions 267 9.1 The Research Problem 267 4 9.2 Summary 268 9.3 What Professions Do 271 9.3.1 Control Admission and Training 272 9.3.2 Define and Defend a Jurisdiction 273 9.3.3 Regulate Each other’s Behaviour 276 9.3.4 Defend and Enhance Corporate Status 278 9.4 Profession as an Identity 279 9.5 Narrative Themes 282 9.6 Secondary Literature in Focus 284 9.6.1 Functionalism 285 9.6.2 Power 287 9.6.3 Professional Project 289 9.6.4 Jurisdiction 290 9.6.5 Managerialism 292 9.7 Final Conclusions 293 Bibliography 296 APPENDICES 372 Appendix A: Occupational Definitions 372 Appendix B: Overview Brief Given to Individual Participants 384 Appendix C: Schedule of Interviewees 387 Architects 387 Building Surveyors 388 Commercial-Developer Professionals 389 Quantity Surveyors 389 Others 391 Associations 391 Appendix D: Selected List of Organisations within the English Building Industry 393 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. 5 Abstract Abstract This thesis describes the methods by which individuals and associations give meaning to the concept of profession within the English building industry in the late modem period. The hypothesis is that professional associations control occupations. Whilst this might be accepted in a wider literature, building professionals identify with a far bleaker, late modem, interpretation of profession. The literature portrays a ‘backwards’ industry without a determinant authority, characterised by fragmented and servile professional associations. The thesis utilises Burrage’s (2006) four-goal-framework to structure its investigation through semi-structured interviews with professionals and their associations. This proposes that associations control admission and training, define and defend a jurisdiction, set up a system to govern their own members and seek to improve their corporate status. This work concludes that professionals and associations strategically engage with these issues. There are problems facing professions, but their demise is not one of them. Indeed, rather than be defensive, associations are enhancing their controlling systems. This involves a looser coupling between associations and their membership, which creates some fracturing to the construction of identity. However, the result is new forms of occupational provision, in alliance with both clients and the state, that establish clear dialogues for identity and very specific types of service that are well separated from external ‘quacks’. Faced with an environment that is ostensibly deeply sceptical, associations are selective in how they defend and enhance both their status and control systems. This has led, for example, to a withdrawal from controlling entry in the face of government demands to widen participation, to be replaced with strong regulatory schemes for members. This creates standardisation and practical guarantees of competency, a powerful executive in a quasi-judicial regulatory role, and clear rules of behaviour and permanent training through CPD. The result is ‘competent’, ‘safe’, ‘good’ and ‘ethical’ occupational jurisdiction. 6 Abstract Acknowledgements Firstly, I owe a debt of gratitude to all those participants who gave up their valuable time and agreed to be interviewed, providing me with such a rich vein of unique empirical data. Thank you. I also owe a great deal to Andrew, to Monika and to Ben for their moral support through this process. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their encouragement during many difficult periods, and especially to my Mum for proofing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Architects Act 1997
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Architects Act 1997. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Architects Act 1997 1997 CHAPTER 22 PART V GENERAL AND SUPPLEMENTARY General [F122 Appeals. (1) A person may appeal to the High Court or, in Scotland, to the Court of Session if he is aggrieved by— (a) refusal of his application for registration in Part 1 of the Register ; (b) failure of the Registrar to comply with section 6(4); (c) his name not being re-entered in, or his name being removed from, Part 1 of the Register by virtue of section 9; (d) the Board’s ordering under section 10 that the Registrar remove his name from Part 1 of the Register; or (e) the making of a disciplinary order in relation to him. (2) Subject to subsection (3), an appeal under subsection (1)(a), (c), (d) or (e) must be made not later than three months after the date on which notice of the decision or order concerned is served on the person. (3) Where an appeal under subsection (1)(a) is made by a person who relied on subsection (2A) of section 4 in applying for registration in pursuance of that section, the appeal must be made not later than four months after the date on which notice of the refusal is served on the person. (4) The time limits for making an appeal under subsection (1)(b) are— (a) where the appeal is made by a person who relied on subsection (2A) of section 4 in applying for registration in pursuance of that section, within seven months, and 2 Architects Act 1997 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • It's So Easy Being Green
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration roundupLyndon B. Johnson Space Center JSC2008E020395 NASA/BLAIR It’s so easy being green APRIL 2008 ■ volume 47 ■ number 4 A few safety­related events have been on my mind recently, and I need your help! First of all, I want to emphasize there is nothing we do in our space program that would require us to take safety shortcuts or unnecessary risks. Spaceflight is inherently risky, including the development and testing of state­of­the­art materials and designs. To be perfectly safe, we would never leave the ground, but that is not the business we chose and it is not the mission our nation gave us. But we should not and cannot add unnecessary risks. None of us should ever feel pressured to do anything we deem unsafe in order to meet a schedule. We have learned to launch when we are ready and not before, and I’m impressed with the number of times we have delayed launches because of reasonable concerns expressed by individuals. My point is: don’t let anyone pressure you into doing something that you consider unsafe. I will back you up. Second, I am concerned that there is reluctance on the part of some folks to report safety incidents such as minor injuries or mishaps or close calls. Their fear is that such reports will affect our safety metrics, such as lost time, days away, Occupational Safety and Health Administration recordable, etc. Let me state very clearly and forcefully that the sole goal of director our safety program is to make our work environment as safe as possible for all our employees.
    [Show full text]
  • EL Education Core Practices
    EL Education Core Practices A Vision for Improving Schools EL Education is a comprehensive school reform and school development model for elementary, middle, and high schools. The Core Practice Benchmarks describe EL Education in practice: what teachers, students, school leaders, families, and other partners do in fully implemented EL Education schools. The five core practices—learning expeditions, active pedagogy, school culture and character, leadership and school improvement, and structures—work in concert and support one another to promote high achievement through active learning, character growth, and teamwork. The Core Practice Benchmarks serve several purposes. They provide a comprehensive overview of the EL Education model, a planning guide for school leaders and teachers, a framework for designing professional development, and a tool for evaluating implementation. Each of the five core practices is comprised of a series of benchmarks. Each benchmark describes a particular area of practice and is organized by lettered components and numbered descriptors. A Different Approach to Teaching and Learning In EL Education schools… Learning is active. Students are scientists, urban planners, historians, and activists, investigating real community problems and collaborating with peers to develop creative, actionable solutions. Learning is challenging. Students at all levels are pushed and supported to do more than they think they can. Excellence is expected in the quality of their work and thinking. Learning is meaningful. Students apply their skills and knowledge to real-world issues and problems and make positive change in their communities. They see the relevance of their learning and are motivated by understanding that learning has purpose. Learning is public.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM to the ARCHITECTS ACT 1997 (AMENDMENTS ETC) ORDER 2014 2014 No. 4 1. This Explanatory Memorandum Has Been
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE ARCHITECTS ACT 1997 (AMENDMENTS ETC) ORDER 2014 2014 No. 4 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Department for Communities and Local Government and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. This memorandum contains information for the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments. 2. Purpose of the instrument 2.1 This Order amends the Architects Act 1997 (the “Act”) First, it extends the tenure of a member of the Architects Registration Board. Secondly, it amends the definition of the ‘relevant European State’ used in the Act by including Switzerland within the definition. This amendment means that Swiss architects (an individual who is recognised or qualified to practice as or hold the title of architect in Switzerland) who wish to practice in the United Kingdom may now benefit from automatic recognition and other rights contained within European Directive 2005/36/EC on the Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications. 3. Matters of special interest to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments 3.1 None 4. Legislative Context 4.1 Directive 2005/36/EC on the Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications (“the Directive”) establishes a system for the mutual recognition of professional qualifications which is intended to make it easier for EU citizens who are entitled to exercise a regulated profession (one requiring proof of specific professional qualifications, such as an architect) in one Member State (their home State) to pursue the same profession in another Member State
    [Show full text]
  • RIBA's Submission to the Call for Evidence on Architects Regulation and the Architects Registration Board
    Royal Institute of British Architects RIBA's submission to the Call for Evidence on Architects Regulation and the Architects Registration Board 29 May 2014 The Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) champions better buildings, communities and the environment through architecture and its members. It has been promoting architecture and architects since being awarded its Royal Charter in 1837. The 40,000-strong professional institute is committed to serving the public interest through good design and professional standards. The RIBA members represent three quarters of the ARB registered architects in the UK as well as 4,300 chartered architects around the world. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The RIBA supports the continued independent statutory regulation of architects in the UK, in the public interest. This has existed for over 80 years and is well established and valued by UK consumers and by the profession as a way of confirming to clients the professional competency and integrity of fully qualified architects, and of providing safeguards against unlawful or incompetent practice. There is no compelling case to change the current structure, and there would be considerable costs and disruption associated with any major change. The three key reasons for the continuation of the regulation of architects in the UK are: 1. Value of architecture: the importance and public value of architecture to the shared environment, cultural heritage, economic success and well-being of society, with expensive and long term consequences for society if architectural skills and standards are inadequately applied. 2. Importance for consumers: the value and complexity of architectural services to often inexpert consumers, who need to be able to identify and rely upon registered ‘architects’ for major investment in their homes, workplaces and built environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Salisbury
    Ian Salisbury architecture and dispute resolution St Thomas’ House 6 Becket Street Oxford OX1 1PP tel : 01865 250777 fax : 01865 250999 Ian@Salisbury.eu DX 145844 Oxford 6 9 May 2009 The Architects Registration Board, 8 Weymouth Street London W1W 5BU Dear Board Members, Consultation 2009/01 – Amendments to the Board’s Criteria at Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 You have invited comment on all three parts of your Criteria which are described as setting the learning outcomes that must be achieved by those successfully gaining the qualifications in architecture that ARB prescribe at Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 level. Such a consultation is valueless if the premise on which the consultation is based is faulty, and my purpose in writing to you is to demonstrate that the Board’s governing statute, the Architects Act, permits the Board under section 4(1)(a) to engage in no activity beyond prescribing the qualification – whereas the Criteria to which you refer either in their present form or in any revised version are clearly intended to provide the means of validating courses rather than prescribing qualifications. The Board has a statutory duty to do no more than to prescribe qualifications and it follows that these Criteria are extraneous to the purposes of the Act. The Act The relevant part of the Act for the purpose of this consultation is section 4(1): A person who has applied to the Registrar in the prescribed manner for registration in pursuance of this section is entitled to be registered in Part 1 of the Register if he holds such qualifications and has gained such practical experience as may be prescribed..
    [Show full text]
  • 12730 Analysis of Law in UK BRX:Layout 1
    Analysis of Law in the United Kingdom pertaining to Cross-Border Disaster Relief Prepared for the British Red Cross by The views expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the British Red Cross. This report is part of a wider study on cross-border disaster assistance within the EU, carried out in conjunction with five other European National Societies, under the overall co-ordination of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. The wider project received funding from the European Commission, who bear no responsibility for the content or use of the information contained in this report. Front cover photograph © Layton Thompson/British Red Cross Flood relief measures in Oxford, 25 July 2007 Analysis of Law in the United Kingdom pertaining to Cross-Border Disaster Relief Foreword The United Kingdom is in the fortunate position of Fisher (International Federation of Red Cross and Red being less susceptible to large-scale natural disasters Crescent Societies), Mr Tim Gordon (HMRC), Mr than many other countries. Even so, and as recent Gordon MacMillan (Hanover Associates UK), Mr Roy years have shown, our territory may still be subject to Wilshire (Chief Fire Officer, Hertfordshire County) such emergencies as flooding, and the effects of severe and Ms Moya Wood-Heath (British Red Cross). winter weather. We also wish to thank the authors of this report, The purpose of this study, commissioned by the British Justine Stefanelli and Sarah Williams of the British Red Cross, is to examine the extent to which the legal, Institute of International and Comparative Law, administrative and operational framework for disaster who were assisted by Katharine Everett, Frances response within the UK is able to facilitate potential McClenaghan, Hidenori Takai and Payam Yoseflavi.
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Pinboarding in Contemporary Television
    Serial Pinboarding in Contemporary Television Anne Ganzert Serial Pinboarding in Contemporary Television Anne Ganzert Serial Pinboarding in Contemporary Television Anne Ganzert University of Konstanz Konstanz, Germany ISBN 978-3-030-35271-4 ISBN 978-3-030-35272-1 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35272-1 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institu- tional affiliations.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20240 The attached property, the Dover Green Historic District in Kent County, Delaware, reference number 77000383, was listed in the National Register of Historic Places by the Keeper of the National Register on 05/05/1977, as evidenced by FEDERAL REGISTER/WEEKLY LIST notice of Tuesday, February 6,1979, Part II, Vol. 44, No. 26, page 7443. The attached nomination form is a copy of the original documentation provided to the Keeper at the time of listing. ational Register of Historic Places Date S:/nr_nhl/jjoecke/archives/inventoriesandfrc/certificanletter/certifyletter . 1MOO ,M-*° UNITEUSTATESUti'AKl/SUti'ARl/ )M)NTOJ THE INTERIOR IFoTh, V UK ONLY NATIONALIATIONAL fAiik SESERVICfc NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES RECEIVED INVENTORY-. NOMINATION FORM DATE ENTERED SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ____ TYPE ALL ENTRIES •• COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS | NAME HISTORIC Dover, Brother's Portion AND/OH COMMON Dover Green Historic District | LOG ATI ON STREETINUMBER Between North, South, and East Streets ____and Governors avenue__________ .... _ _NOTFORPUiU CATION CITY.TOWH CONGRESSIONAL DISTniCT Dover One STATE CODE COUNTY Delaware 10 Kent - 001* ^CLASSIFICATION i CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENTUSE ', X-DISTRICT —PUPLIC X-OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE X— MUSEUM _ BUILDIMGIS) — PRIVATE — UNOCCUPIED &COMM[RaAL X— PARK —STRUCTURE X.BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS -.EDUCATIONAL X_ PRIVATE RESIDENCE { — SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE — ENTERTAINMENT X_REUGtOOS — OBJECT «IN PROCESS —YES' RESTRICTED X.COVERNMENT _SC1ENTIFIC _ BEING CONSIDERED X-YES. UNRESTRICTED ^INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY ™01HER OWNER OF PROPERTY £:tate, County, City Governments, and Private Owners STREET li NUMBER CITY.
    [Show full text]
  • Architects Regulation and the Architects Registration Board Call for Evidence
    Architects Regulation and the Architects Registration Board Call for Evidence Context document April 2014 Department for Communities and Local Government © Crown copyright, 2014 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk. This document/publication is also available on our website at www.gov.uk/dclg If you have any enquiries regarding this document/publication, email contactus@communities.gov.uk or write to us at: Department for Communities and Local Government Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 030 3444 0000 For all our latest news and updates follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/CommunitiesUK April 2014 ISBN: 978-1-4098-4207-1 Introduction Government is interested in understanding people’s views on architect’s regulation to inform a completely independent review for Architect regulation and the Architects Registration Board. This call for evidence sets out in simple terms the basic considerations which form the basis of the review process, and asks people to respond to specific questions as well as providing the opportunity to submit wider ranging comments and views. The call for evidence questionnaire considers; (1) The Case for Architects Regulation (2) Different Models of Architects Regulation (3) Evaluation of the existing regulatory functions and the Architects Registration board The terms of reference for the periodic review is at Annex A to this document.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law Commission Seventh Programme of Law Reform
    THE LAW COMMISSION SEVENTH PROGRAMME OF LAW REFORM Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 15 June 1999 LAW COM No 259 HC 435 The Law Commission was set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Carnwath CVO, Chairman Professor Andrew Burrows Miss Diana Faber Mr Charles Harpum Mr Stephen Silber, QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. The text of this report is available on the Internet at: http://www.open.gov.uk/lawcomm/ ii THE LAW COMMISSION SEVENTH PROGRAMME OF LAW REFORM CONTENTS Paragraph Page FOREWORD BY THE CHAIRMAN 1 PART I:WORK DURING THE SEVENTH PROGRAMME OF LAW REFORM 2 Introduction 1.1 2 (1) THE SEVENTH PROGRAMME OF LAW REFORM Consultation 1.3 2 The Law Commission’s project selection criteria 1.6 3 Timing of projects 1.8 4 Further projects 1.11 7 human rights company law a commercial code A rolling programme of law reform 1.16 8 Programme Items 1.17 8 Item 1: Damages 9 Item 2: Limitation of actions 10 Item 3: Illegal transactions 10 Item 4: Compound interest 11 Item 5: Property law 12 Item 6: The law of trusts 14 Item 7: The law of business associations 16 Item 8: Electronic commerce 17 Item 9: Third parties’ rights against insurers 17 Item 10:Criminal law 18 (2) REFERENCES TO THE COMMISSION BY MINISTERS 1.19
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 24, No. 2: Full Issue
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 24 Number 2 Spring Article 12 May 2020 Vol. 24, no. 2: Full Issue Denver Journal International Law & Policy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation 24 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y (1996). This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Denver Sturm College of Law at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact jennifer.cox@du.edu,dig- commons@du.edu. DENVER JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLICY VOLUME 24 1995-1996 SDenver Journal of International Law and Policy VOLUME 24 NUMBER 2/3 SPRING 1996 ARTICLES PEACE-BUILDING ............................ John Linarelli 253 ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW IN INTERNATIONAL AND NON-INTERNATIONAL CONFLICTS - THE WAY AHEAD .................. L. C. Green 285 ESPIONAGE IN INTERNATIONAL LAw ........................ Lt. Col. Geoffrey B. Demarest 321 THE PLIGHT OF THE LARGER HALF: HUMAN RIGHTS, GENDER VIOLENCE AND THE LEGAL STATUS OF REFUGEE AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED WOMEN IN AFRICA ............................. J. Oloka-Onyango 349 AN ETHICS OF HUMAN RIGHTS: TWO INTERRELATED MISUNDERSTANDINGS ......... Dr.Daniel Warner 395 RUSSIAN DUMPING IN THE SEA OF JAPAN ......... Steven D. Lavine 417 LEONARD v.B. SUTTON INTERNATIONAL LAW COLLOQUIUM KEYNOTE ADDRESS UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING: THE YEARS PAST, THE YEARS AHEAD ........... Joe Byrnes Sills 451 LEONARD v.B. SUTTON AWARD PAPER MILITARY INTERVENTION IN BOSNIA- HERCEGOVINA: WILL WORLD POLITICS PREVAIL OVER THE RULE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW? . Michael P Roch 461 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS LOBUE V.
    [Show full text]