A Hydroelectric Project for Present and Future Generations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Hydroelectric Project for Present and Future Generations Project Agent Eastmain-1-A and Sarcelle Powerhouses and Rupert Diversion A hydroelectric project for present and future generations Information Document • March 2008 CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Hydro 25201 T The pro The obt pro pro of 8 • E n • S o • T p w a R L Me Eas Sar Rob La add infl Pro Un Con 2 CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Hydro 25201 The project in a nutshell The Eastmain-1-A/Sarcelle/Rupert The Rupert diversion is made up of project is now in the construction phase. the following: The Société d’énergie de la Baie James • Four dams obtained the mandate to carry out the • A spillway on the Rupert River, which project. The main components of the will also function as an instream fl ow project, which has an estimated output release structure of 8.7 TWh, are: • 74 dikes • Eastmain-1-A powerhouse (768 MW), • Two diversion bays covering a total near Eastmain-1 powerhouse area of some 346 km2 • Sarcelle powerhouse (150 MW), at the • A 2.9-km-long tunnel between the outlet of Opinaca reservoir Rupert forebay and tailbay • The Rupert diversion, through which • A network of canals with a total length part of the water from the Rupert River of about 7 km to facilitate fl ow in the will fl ow to Eastmain-1, Eastmain-1-A various portions of the diversion bays and Sarcelle powerhouses, then on to while minimizing the total area fl ooded Robert-Bourassa, La Grande-2-A and • Eight hydraulic structures on the La Grande-1 powerhouses Rupert River to maintain post-diversion water levels along approximately half Mean annual output 8.7 TWh the river's length Eastmain-1-A powerhouse 2.3 TWh To comply with the maximum water Sarcelle powerhouse 1.1 TWh level stipulated in the Sakami Lake Agreement, a canal equipped with Power that’s clean and green: Robert-Bourassa, a concrete weir will be constructed a very profi table drop of water … La Grande-2-A and La Grande-1: at the lake's outlet. four times through the turbines! additional output generated by infl ows from the Rupert 5.3 TWh To bring the electricity generated by The project’s main strength lies in the the new powerhouses onto the power optimization of the generating capacity Project cost $5 billion grid, a 315-kV line will be built between of the La Grande complex. Once it has Unit cost 5.1¢/kWh the Eastmain-1 and Eastmain-1-A switch- driven the turbines at Eastmain-1 or yards, and between Sarcelle and Eastmain-1-A and Sarcelle powerhouses, Construction schedule 2007–2012 Eastmain-1 substations. the water diverted from the Rupert River will increase the turbine fl ow at the existing Robert-Bourassa, La Grande-2-A and La Grande-1 generating stations. 3 CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Hydro 25201 Studies conducted in collaboration From design with the Crees P to construction From 1998 to 2001, Hydro-Québec Environmentally friendly Wi developed a draft version of the project During the studies, concerns expressed Du in collaboration with the Crees. by the Cree Nation and James Bay The With the signing of the Paix des Braves residents infl uenced the design of the Ne in February 2002, the Crees consented to project. We the project’s construction subject to the In the construction phase, the environ- pat conditions set out in the Boumhounan mental program has three main focuses: sur Agreement as well as compliance with monitoring the work for compliance with Fea the applicable legislation. applicable laws and regulations, imple- trad Between February 2002 and December menting planned mitigation measures, of t 2004, in collaboration with the Crees, and launching a follow-up of environ- and Hydro-Québec optimized the project mental changes caused by the project. design and conducted the environmental impact study in accordance with the directives of the governments of Québec and Canada. In November 2006 and February 2007, after a stringent environmental assess- ment process, Hydro-Québec obtained Criteria that infl uenced the project design: the necessary government approvals to • Minimal fl ooding of land begin the project, deemed environmen- • Application of an ecological instream fl ow regime in the Rupert River tally, socially, technically and economi- • Maintenance of fl ow equivalent to the natural fl ow in the Lemare and Nemiscau rivers Du cally acceptable. • Building of hydraulic structures on the Rupert River to protect fi sh communities For The building of permanent structures and habitat, preserve the natural appearance of the river, and support navigation Hyd began in February 2007. Eastmain-1-A and land use in some of its stretches wa and Sarcelle powerhouses will be com- • Mesgouez Lake, Champion Lake and Lake Nemiscau to be kept at their natural levels fro missioned in 2011 and 2012 respectively. • Supply of drinking water to be ensured for the village of Waskaganish abo The Rupert diversion will go into opera- • Sakami Lake to be maintained at the level set out in the Sakami Lake Agreement and tion in December 2009. • Guarantees, assurances and undertakings in the Boumhounan Agreement Com bet tra com abo mit sup pro 4 CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Hydro 25201 Signing of the Paix des Braves with the Crees Partnerships on February 7, 2002 Foreground, from left to right: Bernard Landry, then Premier of Québec, and Dr. Ted Moses, former Grand Chief of the Grand Council of the Crees of Québec With the Crees Many means of communication are With the Jamesians used by the Committee: During the studies During the studies • Meetings with Cree land users The Cree communities of Mistissini, Information and discussion panels were directly aff ected by the project Nemaska, Waskaganish, Eastmain, an opportunity to meet with Jamesian • Public information sessions in Wemindji and Chisasibi actively partici- land users and discuss the results of the communities pated in the environmental and technical the environmental and technical studies • Distribution of the Boumhounan surveys through the Cree–Hydro-Québec at each major stage of the draft design. Newsletter Feasibility Study Group. Thus, the Crees’ Concerns expressed during these • Radio programs traditional knowledge and knowledge meetings were taken into account of the land played a key role in collecting For any questions about the in the project design. and interpreting the data. Committee and its activities, call (514) 286-2020, ext. 2022, During construction or send an e-mail to Throughout the construction period, [email protected]. Jamesians will be kept informed of the project status. At statutory meetings with ComaxNORD, Hydro-Québec–SEBJ will continue its discussions with Nord- du-Québec stakeholders to ensure the implementation of measures designed Information session to maximize regional economic spinoff s. for the Crees During construction For the construction phase, the Cree– Signing of the partnering agreement Hydro-Québec Follow-Up Committee with the Municipality of Baie-James on January 28, 2005 was created, made up of representatives Background: from left to right, Sam from the Cree communities mentioned Hamad, then Québec Minister of Natural above, from the Niskamoon Company Resources, Wildlife and Parks, and Jean Charest, Premier of Québec. Foreground, and from Hydro-Québec. The roles of the Thierry Vandal, then President of Hydro- Committee include promoting discussion Québec Production, and Gérald Lemoyne, Mayor of the Municipality of Baie-James between Hydro-Québec and the Crees, transmitting information to the Cree communities, advising Hydro-Québec about the environmental follow-up and mitigation measures, and coordinating support for trappers throughout the project. 5 CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Hydro 25201 Rupert diversion Instream fl ow In order to protect fi sh habitat and preserve navigation and fi shing, an ecological instream fl ow regime will be implemented downstream of Rupert Visual simulation dam. A spillway equipped with a control Spillway releasing structure will release the instream fl ow, instream fl ow The Rupert River stretches some 560 km which will be modulated according to from Lake Mistassini to Rupert Bay. A four main biological cycles for fi sh, namely dam will be built 314 km from the river spring spawning, summer feeding, fall mouth and 71% of the river’s fl ow will spawning and winter incubation. be diverted north, leaving a residual fl ow Instream fl ow release structures on the of 29%. Between the dam and the river Lemare and Nemiscau rivers, two tribu- mouth, infl ows from the tributaries will taries of the Rupert, will help maintain continue to feed the river. Thus, the fl ow mean annual fl ows equivalent to natural at the mouth of the Rupert River, near conditions. the village of Waskaganish, will be equiv- alent to 48% of the present mean annual Future instream fl ow of the Rupert fl ow. In other words, 52% of the water at the diversion point in the Rupert watershed will be diverted toward Eastmain-1 and Eastmain-1-A. Spring fl ow 416 m3/s Getting the diverted fl ow to the power- Summer fl ow 127 m3/s houses will entail the creation of two Fall fl ow 267 m3/s diversion bays: the Rupert forebay and tailbay. A series of hydraulic and retaining Winter fl ow 127 m3/s structures will be built to contain the Mean annual fl ow 181 m3/s diverted waters in the diversion bays and channel the fl ow northward. A tunnel approximately 2.9 km long will transfer the fl ow from forebay to tailbay. These structures are designed to mini- mize the land areas fl ooded. Loca 6 CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Hydro 25201 e rol w, ely e u- KP 290 Visual simulation of weir ral Before partial diversion of the Rupert After partial diversion of the Rupert 3/s 3/s 3/s 3/s 3/s Location of hydraulic structures on the Rupert River 7 CYAN MAGENTA YELLOW BLACK Hydro 25201 Road that will run alongside Creation of Rupert Rupert tailbay diversion bays Diversion bays For The partial diversion of the Rupert • U River will require construction of a series • L of hydraulic and retaining structures, • T including a rockfi ll dam on the Rupert • R River and three sand and gravel dams, • L one on the Lemare River and two on the r Nemiscau.
Recommended publications
  • Summer Guide
    350TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION July 16-22, 2018 Help us celebrate Waskaganish in all its beauty and wonder! Information Guide 350th Team & Sponsors 350th ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION PLANNING COMMITTEE Charles J. Hester, Director of Culture, Sports and Leisure Darryl S. Hester, 350th Anniversary Coordinator Stacy Bear, Cultural Department - Member Ryan Erless, Director of Community Services - Member Hugo Cowboy, Recreation Department - Member Jimmy (Tim) Whiskeychan, Tourism Coordinator - Member Conrad Blueboy, Youth Chief - Member William T. Hester, Elders Council - Member Simeon Trapper, Elders Council - Member Ruth Salt, Elders Council - Member Roy Weistche, Community Planner - Member A. Thomas Hester, Communications Officer - Member Walter Hester Jr., Local Radio - Member Darryl J. Salt, Cree Trappers Association - Member Bradley Wyman, Northern Store Manager - Member CONTACT INFORMATION P.O. Box 60 70 Waskaganish Rd. Waskaganish, QC J0M1R0 Tel.: (819)895-8650 ext.3235 Cell: (819)316-0396 Fax: (819)895-8901 E-Mail: [email protected] The Summer 350th Anniversary Celebration is made possible by funding from Cree Nation of Waskaganish, Cree Nation Government, Waskaganish Albert Diamond Golf Classic, Government of Canada, Niskamoon Corporation & Northwest Company Table Of Contents Welcome: Message from Chief Darlene Cheechoo .................................................... 4 Message from 350th Anniversary Celebration Committee ......................... 4 Waskaganish: A small town with a big history ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Health Status and Health Determinants in the Cree Region (Eeyou Istchee)
    The Evolution of Health Status and Health Determinants in the Cree Region (Eeyou Istchee): Eastmain 1-A Powerhouse and Rupert Diversion Sectoral Report Volume 1: Context and Findings Series 4 Number 3: Report on the health status of the population Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay The Evolution of Health Status and Health Determinants in the Cree Region (Eeyou Istchee): Eastmain-1-A Powerhouse and Rupert Diversion Sectoral Report Volume 1 Context and Findings Jill Torrie Ellen Bobet Natalie Kishchuk Andrew Webster Series 4 Number 3: Report on the Health Status of the Population. Public Health Department of the Cree Territory of James Bay Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay. Authors Jill Torrie Cree Board of Health & Social Services of James Bay (Montreal) [email protected] Ellen Bobet Confluence Research and Writing (Gatineau) [email protected] Natalie Kishchuk Programme evaluation and applied social research consultant (Montreal) [email protected] Andrew Webster Analyst in health negotiations, litigation, and administration (Ottawa) [email protected] Series editor & co-ordinator: Jill Torrie, Cree Public Health Department Cover design: Katya Petrov [email protected] Photo credit: Catherine Godin This document can be found online at: www.Creepublichealth.org Reproduction is authorised for non-commercial purposes with acknowledgement of the source. Document deposited on Santécom (http://www. Santecom.qc.ca) Call Number: INSPQ-2005-18-2005-001 Legal deposit – 2nd trimester 2005 Bibliothèque Nationale du Québec National Library of Canada ISSN: 2-550-443779-9 © April 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuilding Relations: Hydro-Québec and the Cree Nation (1994–2015)
    Éthique publique vol.18, n° 1 (2016) Controverse et acceptabilité sociale des projets de développement économique Original text written in French. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Sofiane Baba, Emmanuel Raufflet, John Paul Murdoch and Réal Courcelles Rebuilding Relations: Hydro-Québec and the Cree Nation (1994–2015) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Warning The content of this site is under the control of French legislation respecting intellectual property and is the exclusive property of the editor. The works on this site may be consulted and reproduced as hard or soft copies, on condition that such documents be strictly reserved for personal, scientific or pedagogical purposes, excluding any commercial use. All reproductions must include the names of the publisher, journal and author, and the document reference information. All other reproduction is prohibited without the prior consent of the publisher, except in cases where it is permitted under applicable legislation in France. Revues.org is an online portal for humanities and social
    [Show full text]
  • Peaceful Green Field
    « You are my best business partners! » Summary Billy Diamond - Who we are - Companies Activities - Partnerships with First Nations - Short video Province of Quebec Nuna Ressources Groupe Desfor Partnerships Inuit, Kuujjuaq With First Nations Taw ich-Desf o r Cree, Wemindji Siib ii-Wask a Cr ee, Waskaganish Nemaska Ressources Unnu Construction Cree, Nemaska Waska Ressources Innu, Maliot enam Pak u a-Nemet au Ressources Cree, Waskaganish Innu, Pakuashipi N ew co Cree, Waskaganish and Nemaska Wask A r no Cree, Waskaganish Cree Forestry Partnership Cr ee Communities Nutashkuan Ressources Washw a N u Nemet au Ressources Innu, Nat asquan Cree, Waswanipi Innu, Maliot enam A k i-Desf o r LP Algonquin, Pikogan Washw a N u -M o r eau Cree, Waswanipi Lac Sim o n Wey m o k Algonquin, Lac SimonAtikamekw, Wemotaci Tegsiq Wit hw o r t h Mi’cmaq, List uguj Ot eno Wend ak e M alécit es Atikamekw, Manawan H u r o ns K it igan Z ib i Gr o u p e Algonquin, M aniw ak i A m t ech Desf o r Legend: Red: Co-company (JV or company) K anesat ak e Green: In discussion M o haw k s Diamond Groupe Family Desfor Elizabeth Diamond President Robert Desautels General Manager Ian Diamond Jean-Claude Dostie Luc Desrosiers Martin Tremblay Business Environment Administration Development • Joint force with Siibii Development Corporation • Use sub-contractor from other communities (Apitsiu, VCC, etc…) • Use Human Resources from other communities (lineman) • Forestry • Civil Engineering • Project Management • Construction (RBQ licence) • Environment • Surveying • Geomatics • Communications • Customized Training Let’s say you want to travel the world….
    [Show full text]
  • Nituuchischaayihtitaau Aschii
    Nituuchischaayihtitaau Aschii MULTI -CO mm UNITY ENVIRON M ENT -AND -HEALTH STUDY IN EEYOU ISTCHEE , 2005-2009: FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Public Health Report Series 4 on the Health of the Population Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay September 2013 Nituuchischaayihtitaau Aschii MULTI -CO mm UNITY ENVIRON me NT -AND -HE ALT H STUDY IN EE YOU IS TC hee , 2005-2009: FINAL TE C H NICAL RE PORT Chisasibi Eastmain Mistissini Nemaska Oujé-Bougoumou Waskaganish Waswanipi Wemindji Whapmagoostui Public Health Report Series 4 on the Health of the Population Cree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay September 2013 We would like to thank Evert Nieboer, Professor Emeritus at McMaster University, friend and colleague, for his perseverance and strong leadership over the past ten years, throughout the planning, field work and reporting of this study. He first became involved in Eeyou Istchee in 2002 when he was invited by the Cree Nation of Oujé- Bougoumou to be a co-investigator in the study of the health impacts from former mining developments in their traditional territory. After that study, he agreed to carry out a community consultation to plan the NA study and has continued his active leadership throughout the years to ensure the successful completion of this report. Nieboer E, Dewailly E, Johnson-Down L, Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Château-Degat M-L, Egeland GM, Atikessé L, Robinson E, Torrie J. Nituuchischaayihtitaau Aschii Multi-community Environment-and-Health Study in Eeyou Istchee 2005- 2009: Final Technical Report. Nieboer E, Robinson E, Petrov K, editors. Public Health Report Series 4 on the Health of the Population.
    [Show full text]
  • AES History of Hydro Cumulative Impacts.Indd
    Brief History of Events Pertaining to Cumulative Impacts of Hydroelectric Developments on the Marine Ecosystem of James and Hudson Bay Compiled by THE ARCTIC EIDER SOCIETY * 1971 Hydroelectric projects in James Bay announced by the Quebec government. Due to a lack of consultation and environmental assessment, Cree launch a lawsuit against Hydro Quebec (HQ) 1973 Government ruling halts construction until an agreement can be reached with Cree and Inuit 1975 James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement was signed (and in 1978 NE Quebec Agreement) Canada’s fi rst modern land claim settlements. Pave way for completion of Phase I. No such Agreement was signed with the Belcher Islands Inuit. 1986-2005 Community based eider down industry developed in Sanikiluaq 1989 Federal Government meets with Sanikiluaq Hamlet Council who raise concerns about La Grande Complex impacts on sea ice habitats and the marne ecosystem. 1990 Cree and Inuit travel down Hudson River to New York City to raise publicity about impacts of proposed Great Whale project 1990-1995 Sanikiluaq raises concerns with Great Whale Hydroelectricity Project Details: With the proposed Great Whale hydroelectric project, the Environment Committee of the Municipality of Sanikiluaq received intervener status in the federal environmental review assessment, and funds to participate in the review. At the time, the Environment Committee also started a large project with the Rawson Academy of Aquatic Science and the Canadian Arctic Resources Committee (CARC) in which money from both the federal government and private foundations was spent on generating more information and knowledge on Hudson Bay by looking at physical and biological sciences and traditional ecological knowledge and management systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydro-Québec and the Crees: the Challenges of Being Accountable to First Nations - Case and Teaching Notes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264820248 Hydro-Québec and the Crees: the challenges of being accountable to First Nations - case and teaching notes Article in International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies · January 2013 DOI: 10.1504/IJTCS.2013.058806 CITATIONS READS 4 392 2 authors: Eduardo Schiehll Emmanuel Raufflet HEC Montréal - École des Hautes Études commerciales HEC Montréal - École des Hautes Études commerciales 32 PUBLICATIONS 241 CITATIONS 77 PUBLICATIONS 475 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Company Community Relations View project Dark Side AoM View project All content following this page was uploaded by Emmanuel Raufflet on 24 December 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Int. J. Teaching and Case Studies, Vol. X, No. Y, xxxx 1 Hydro-Québec and the Crees: the challenges of being accountable to First Nations Eduardo Schiehll* HEC Montréal, 3000, Ch. Cotê-Sainte-Catherine, 5369 Montréal (QC), H3T 2A7, Canada E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author Emmanuel Raufflet HEC Montréal, 3000, Ch. Côte-Sainte-Catherine, 5220 Montréal (Québec), H3T 2A7, Canada E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This case highlights various phases in four decades of relations between Hydro-Québec, a provincial utility, and the Crees, a First Nation living mainly in northern Quebec, progressing from conflicts and impasse to accountability. It highlights two processes: 1) the stages in the relational process between a company and a community from the perspective of a social license to operate at the interorganisational level; 2) management accounting processes, which translate into corporate commitments and agreements concerning accountability and transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • Rupert River Ecological Instream Flow Regime
    Eastmain-1-A/Sarcelle/Rupert Hydroelectric Development INFORMATION BULLETIN NUMBER 1 JUNE 2010 Rupert River Ecological Instream Flow Regime 416 m3/s Between Cold fall - End of October 45 days and Warm fall - Early November 267 m3/s 20 to 30 days 127 m3/s 127 m3/s 127 m3/s 9 days 3 days 5 days 3 days 4 5 1 3 2 3 When Mesgouez Lake at 450 m /s Early July Early October Not before early May Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter To better reproduce the natural 1 Walleye cycle of the river, the flow rates are controlled. Therefore, the spawning and hatching 2 Longnose sucker Spring spawning, egg incubation periods in spring and in fall are and emergence - mid-May to early-July not disturbed. Intensive feeding period 3 White sucker early June to early Oct. To protect the fish habitat and fishing downstream of the 4 Sturgeon Rupert River’s dam, a spillway Fall spawning - early Oct. to early Nov. allows the instream flow rates 5 Lake whitefish Egg incubation and emergence to be modulated. early Nov. to end of May Intensive feeding period - early June to early Oct. For a better understanding of how hydroelectricity affects the land. Partial Diversion of the Rupert River Partial Diversion of the To Robert-Bourassa, La Grande-2-A and Rupert River La Grande-1 Generating Stations The instream flow release structure Sarcelle Generating Station at the Rupert spillway will return 29% (in construction) of the mean annual flow to the river. The ecological instream flow will be 45% at Nemiscau Lake and 48% at Waskaganish, thanks to inflows from the rivers and streams that empty Opinaca Reservoir into the Rupert River downstream of the Rupert dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Whabouchi Mining Project Draft Environmental Assessment Report
    Whabouchi Mining Project Draft Environmental Assessment Report May 6, 2015 Executive Summary Nemaska Lithium Inc. (“the Proponent”) is proposing to develop and operate a spodumene deposit in Whabouchi (“the Project”). The Project is located 30 km east of Nemaska and 280 km from Chibougamau. It is located entirely on Category III land under the jurisdiction of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, and is managed by the Eeyou Istchee regional government. The Project primarily involves the construction, operation, restoration and decommissioning of an open-pit and underground spodumene mine, a waste rock and tailings pile, an ore processing plant, and administrative and maintenance buildings. The mine would have an average ore production rate of 3 000 tonnes per day over a life of 26 years. The Project is subject to an environmental assessment by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012, as it constitutes a designated activity under subsection 16(a) of the Regulations Designating Physical Activities: “the construction, operation, decommissioning and abandonment of a new metal mine, other than a rare earth element mine or gold mine, with an ore production capacity of 3 000 t/d or more.” The Project also underwent a provincial environmental and social impact assessment by the Government of Quebec under Section 22 of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. No federal-provincial cooperation agreement exists for Projects subject to the provincial process. However, to improve the application of the two environmental assessment processes, the Agency maintained cooperative ties with the Government of Quebec throughout the environmental assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventures on the Rupert River
    Autumn 2001 Vol. 28 No.3 Quarterly Journal of the Wilderness Canoe Association 26 July: put-in below falls after Lac Nemiscau ADVENTURES ON THE RUPERT RIVER Brett Hodnett In the previous couple of years, my canoeing partner, paddle the 80 or 90 km up the west shore to the start of Alex, and myself had been disappointed with the low the Rupert River. We would then paddle along the Rupert water levels we had been encountering on our river trips. River for either 600 km to Hwy 109, or 100 km further to So, for our 1999 trip we vowed to find a river with a lot Waskaganish on James Bay. of water. We certainly found it! The Rupert River begins We wouldn't be passing anywhere that we could north of Chibougamau in northern Quebec, flowing out of restock, so we brought enough food for 30 days, Mistassini Lake through hundreds of kilometres of wilder- although we didn't think we would be away that long. ness into James Bay. It has such a strong current that it's For trips of this length we don't even bother to pack high on Hydro Quebec's "hope-to-destroy" list. We light since it seems like a ridiculous amount to carry planned to drive to the south end of Mistassini Lake and either way. -1- Nastawgan Autumn 2001 Lac Lac Lac Mistassini James Bay lIioosonee * (hibouqanau I know when I read about a trip, I like to hear some 12 July The band council office at Mistassini Reserve of the details about gear and whatnot, so I'll give a brief opened at 8 a.m., so we were there at 8 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastmain-1-A and Rupert Diversion Project
    Commission fédérale d'examen du Federal Review Panel for the Eastmain-1-A projet Eastmain-1-A et dérivation Diversion Project Rupert ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EASTMAIN-1-A AND RUPERT DIVERSION PROJECT PANEL REPORT NOVEMBER 30, 2006 Note: This English translation of the panel report originally submitted in French from the Eastmain 1-A and Rupert Diversion federal review panel has not been reviewed by any of the federal review panel members. CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE The environmental assessment of the Eastmain-1-A and Rupert Diversion Project was conducted in the specific context of harmonization within the framework of the Agreement Concerning the Environmental Assessments of the Eastmain-1-A and Rupert Diversion Project. Under the Agreement, signed by the Government of Canada, the Government of Quebec and the Cree Regional Authority, the Review Committee (COMEX), a standing provincial committee under the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, and the Federal Environmental Assessment Review Panel had to take the necessary measures to prevent duplication and overlap and to co- ordinate and align the assessment and review processes. Owing to its complexity and the responsibility it entails, an environmental assessment of this scope could not be carried out without the participation of a large number of interested parties. I would like to extend my thanks to COMEX, which has been the Panel’s partner on this long journey, from the moment the proponent’s environmental impact assessment was received to the preparation of this report. The Panel would not be able to submit its report today were it not for the generous collaboration of COMEX members and analysts, especially with regard to their outstanding contributions to preparing a number of sections of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem
    11–1 11.0 HUMAN OCCUPATION Chapter Contents 11.1 PREHISTORY (2000 BC - 1610 AD) ....................................................................................................................11–1 11.1.1 Pre Dorset Culture (2000 - 800 BC)..............................................................................................................11–2 11.1.2 Dorset Culture (800 BC - 1500 AD) ..............................................................................................................11–2 11.1.3 Thule Culture (1000 - 1600 AD)....................................................................................................................11–3 11.1.4 Inuit Culture (1600 - present) ........................................................................................................................11–4 11.1.5 Indian Cultures ..............................................................................................................................................11–5 11.2 HISTORY (1610 - 2004 AD)..................................................................................................................................11–6 11.2.1 Early Exploration and Mapping (1610 -1632) ...............................................................................................11–8 11.2.2 Struggle for Control of the Bay (1668-1713) .................................................................................................11–8 11.2.3 Development by the Hudson's Bay Company and Whaling (1714-1903)...................................................11–12
    [Show full text]