DOCSLIB.ORG

Statement in Response to the Waterford City Council Boundary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statement in Response to the Waterford City Council Boundary Comhairle Chontae Chill Chainnigh Kilkenny County Council Statement of Response to the Waterford City Council Boundary Extension Proposal 2nd December 2005 SECTION PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 2 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………..……….………………………. 4 3 KILKENNY COUNTY COUNCIL REBUTTAL OF WATERFORD CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL….……………………………………………………………… 9 4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED BOUNDARY EXTENSION .................................. 16 5 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPLICATIONS .................................................... 20 6 DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY WITHIN WATERFORD CITY.................................. 42 7 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS........................................................................... 49 8 RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC POINTS IN THE WATERFORD CITY PROPOSAL......... 72 APPENDICES RESOLUTION BY KILKENNY COUNTY COUNCIL Local Government Act 1991 Resolution Proposed by: Seconded by: It was resolved at a meeting of the Kilkenny County Council held on the 2nd of December, 2005 in the Council Chamber, County Hall, John Street, Kilkenny. ”That the County Council of the County of Kilkenny, having considered the proposal for a Borough Boundary Extension submitted by Waterford City Council, adopts and makes the Statement of Response herewith in relation to the proposal for a Borough Boundary Extension under the provisions of Section 29 of the Local Government Act, 1991 and, in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1991 and the requirements of the Local Government (Boundary Alterations) Regulations, 1996 made under the Act and hereby proposes that there should be no extension of the Boundary of the County Borough of Waterford. The Corporate Seal of the Council be affixed to this Statement of Response“. Present when the Seal of the County Council of the County of Kilkenny was affixed hereto: __________________________ Chairman/Nominated Member __________________________ County Manager __________________________ County Secretary 1 Section 1: Introduction 1.1 On, 25 July 2005 Kilkenny County Council received notice of a resolution passed by Waterford City Council adopting a proposal in accordance with the provisions of Part V of the Local Government Act 1991 to alter the boundary of Waterford City. 1.2 In accordance with Section 29(3) of the Local Government Act 1991, Kilkenny County Council is required to consider this proposal and make a statement of its response to the proposal within a period of six months from the date of receipt i.e. before 25 January 2006. 1.3 This document is the Statement of Response of Kilkenny County Council to Waterford City Council's proposal. It has been prepared having regard to the Local Government (Boundary Alteration) Regulations 1996 which prescribes the format for a statement of response as follows: i. Setting out the observations of the respondent in relation to the proposal; ii. Setting out the appropriate data relating to the following matters where different from that contained in the proposal: ° population: ° area in hectares ° rateable valuation ° number of commercial premises ° an estimate of the number of households ° estimated annual income generated from rates, charges and other sources; iii. Setting out, in relation to each programme group, the estimated income and expenditure implications for the respondent; iv. Where appropriate, suggesting any revisions to the proposal, including revision of the proposed boundary or in relation to financial, administrative or organisational matters; and v. Where revision is suggested by the respondent to the proposed boundary, including a map showing the revised boundary. 1.4 The making of a Statement of Response is a reserved function of Kilkenny County Council. A copy of the resolution of Kilkenny County Council, which adopts this Statement of Response in rejection of the proposal to extend the Waterford City boundary, is included. 2 1.5 This Statement of Response: i. Provides the response of Kilkenny County Council to the proposal made by Waterford City Council seeking an extension of the City's boundaries; and ii. Shows the findings of independent assessments commissioned by the Council of the financial and planning implications of the City Council‘s proposals. 1.6 Mazars, in association with DTZ Pieda Consulting, were commissioned by Kilkenny County Council to assist with the preparation of this Statement of Response. 1.7 This Statement of Response is set out as follows: Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Executive Summary Section 3: Kilkenny County Council‘s rebuttal of the key points made by Waterford City Council in seeking to support its proposal, the reasons why these points are not valid and why therefore the proposal should be rejected Section 4: Describes the boundary extension proposed by Waterford City Council Section 5: Reviews the regional development context and implications Section 6: Presents the development potential within Waterford City at present Section 7: Reviews the financial implications of the proposed boundary extension, and Section 8: Contains the response of Kilkenny County Council to specific points raised in the City‘s proposal. Appendices:- A Figure 4.1 - Map of boundary extension proposed by Waterford City Council B Figure 4.2 - History of Waterford City Boundary Extensions C Figure 5.1 œ Waterford City Land Zoning D Glossary 3 Section 2: Executive Summary of the Statement of Response by Kilkenny County Council Having considered the proposal made by Waterford City, and having assessed all other relevant aspects, Kilkenny County Council now formally rejects the Waterford City boundary extension proposal. The key objections held by Kilkenny County Council to the proposed boundary extension are that:- 1. The boundary extension proposed by Waterford City Council is not required to provide land for future development as the City already has substantial land available within its existing boundary. In particular:- ° Within Waterford City‘s current boundaries, 1,599 ha (3,950 acres) or 38% of the City‘s land area, is zoned for agricultural use. Much of this agricultural land was incorporated into the City in 1980, when it was granted a boundary extension into County Waterford, on the basis that the City then required additional space for development; ° The new Outer Ring Road will provide much improved access to this undeveloped land, thereby eliminating any suggested barriers to its development. Recent press statements from Waterford City Council say that this new road will open up these lands and facilitate the construction of circa 6,000 houses as well as commercial development; ° In addition to its agricultural land, the City already has sufficient land zoned for residential use to accommodate its projected population growth to at least 2021 and possibly to 2030; ° Furthermore, 50% of the land currently zoned for industrial use within the City remains available for development, and ° If the City‘s proposal for a boundary extension were to be granted, Waterford City would have a much greater land area and a far smaller population than other Gateway cities. For example, at present Cork City has a population almost three times that of Waterford City, yet it has a land area smaller than that of Waterford. If the boundary extension were granted, Waterford‘s population density would then be 7.6 persons per hectare (or 3.0 persons per acre) whereas other Gateway cities typically have densities four times greater than this. Waterford City clearly has ample space for planned development far into the future. 4 2. Key National and Regional Development Strategies currently in place promote the principle of co-operation between the relevant local authorities, not boundary changes, to achieve national, regional and local development objectives. In particular:- ° The National Spatial Strategy (NSS) provides for a development framework in the South East region that is based on the —Waterford/Wexford/Kilkenny growth triangle“ that requires these centres to work together in —a co-ordinated and integrated approach that builds on their complementary strengths“; ° The Waterford Planning Land Use and Transportation Study (PLUTS), adopted in 2004 by Waterford City Council and Kilkenny and Waterford County Councils, specifically states that the three authorities —will agree on how best to co-operate on implementation issues, to agree on appropriate joint monitoring and review structures“; ° The South East Regional Planning Guidelines (SERPG) endorsed the PLUTS and went one step further by proposing that an implementation group be set up —to deliver a consistent approach across administrative boundaries“; ° One of the central arguments put forward by Waterford City in proposing the boundary extension involves the concept of developing a —compact city“. In this regard, the European Commission‘s European Spatial Dimension Perspective (ESDP) recommends that in order to achieve a compact city “co-operation between the city and the surrounding countryside must be intensified“; ° Inter-authority co-operation in the South-East region has already been demonstrated by activities such as the development and adoption of a regional waste management plan and regional planning guidelines and specifically between Waterford City and Kilkenny in the planning and development of the City‘s main drainage scheme. Clearly the co-operative approach as sought consistently by Kilkenny County Council is the favoured approach at European, National and Regional levels.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Litter Management Plan 2021 - 2024
    LITTER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2021 - 2024 1 | P a g e Contents Contents 1. Introduction: ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. What is litter? .................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Why is Waterford City & County Council required to have a Litter Management Plan? ............... 5 4. Methodology for drafting the litter management plan 2021 - 2024 .............................................. 6 5. Quantifying the Litter Problem. ...................................................................................................... 7 6. Litter Complaint Handling: .............................................................................................................. 9 7. Review of Previous Litter Management Plans .............................................................................. 11 8. Continuing issues of Concern ........................................................................................................ 13 9. Objectives of the Litter Management Plan 2017 – 2020 .............................................................. 19 10. Responsibility for meeting these Objectives: ........................................................................... 20 Cleansing & Provision of Facilities: ................................................................................................... 21 Education / Awareness: ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MUNSTER VALES STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN November 2020
    Strategic Tourism Development Plan 2020-2025 Developing the TOURISM POTENTIAL of the Munster Vales munster vales 2 munster vales 3 Strategic Tourism Development Plan Strategic Tourism Development Plan CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction 1 Destination Context 5 Consultation Summary 19 Case Studies 29 Economic Assessment 39 Strategic Issues Summary 49 Vision, Recommendations and Action Plan 55 Appendicies 85 Munster Vales acknowledge the funding received from Tipperary Local Community Development Committee and the EU under the Rural Development Programme 2014- 2020. “The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development: Europe investing in rural areas.” Prepared by: munster vales 4 munster vales 5 Strategic Tourism Development Plan Strategic Tourism Development Plan MUNSTER VALES STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN November 2020 Prepared by: KPMG Future Analytics and Lorraine Grainger Design by: KPMG Future Analytics munster vales i munster vales ii Strategic Tourism Development Plan Strategic Tourism Development Plan The context for this strategy is discussed in Part Two. To further raise the profile of Munster Vales, enhance the This includes an overview of progress which highlights the cohesiveness of the destination, and to maximise the opportunity following achievements since the launch of Munster Vales in presented by four local authorities working in partnership, this 2017: strategy was tasked with identifying a small number of ambitious products that could be developed and led by Munster Vales ■ Acted as an umbrella destination brand
    [Show full text]
  • Waterford Industrial Archaeology Report
    Pre-1923 Survey of the Industrial Archaeological Heritage of the County of Waterford Dublin Civic Trust April 2008 SURVEY OF PRE-1923 COUNTY WATERFORD INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE April 2008 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Executive Summary 1 3. Methodology 3 4. Industrial Archaeology in Ireland 6 - Industrial Archaeology in Context 6 - Significance of Co. Waterford Survey 7 - Legal Status of Sites 9 5. Industrial Archaeology in Waterford 12 6. Description of Typologies & Significance 15 7. Issues in Promoting Regeneration 20 8. Conclusions & Future Research 27 Bibliography 30 Inventory List 33 Inventory of Industrial Archaeological Sites 36 Knockmahon Mines, Copper Coast, Co. Waterford SURVEY OF PRE-1923 COUNTY WATERFORD INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE 1. INTRODUCTION Waterford County Council, supported by the Heritage Council, commissioned Dublin Civic Trust in July 2007 to compile an inventory of the extant pre-1923 industrial heritage structures within Waterford County. This inventory excludes Waterford City from the perimeters of study, as it is not within the jurisdiction of Waterford County Council. This survey comes from a specific objective in the Waterford County Heritage Plan 2006 – 2011, Section 1.1.17 which requests “…a database (sic) the industrial and engineering heritage of County Waterford”. The aim of the report, as discussed with Waterford County Council, is not only to record an inventory of industrial archaeological heritage but to contextualise its significance. It was also anticipated that recommendations be made as to the future re-use of such heritage assets and any unexplored areas be highlighted. Mary Teehan buildings archaeologist, and Ronan Olwill conservation planner, for Dublin Civic Trust, Nicki Matthews conservation architect and Daniel Noonan consultant archaeologist were the project team.
    [Show full text]
  • BMH.WS1230.Pdf
    ROINN COSANTA. BUREAU OF MILITARY HISTORY, 1913-21. STATEMENT BY WITNESS. DOCUMENT NO. W.S. 1,230 Witness Micheal 0 Cuirrin (Michael Curran), Baile na nGall (Ballinagall), Rinn (Ring), Co. Puirt Lairge (Co. Waterford). Identity. Cap tain, Ring Company Irish Volunteers, Co. Waterford, 1917 -. Subject. Ring Company Irish Volunteers Co. Waterford, 1913-1923. Conditions, if any, Stipulated byWitness Nil File No. S.2538 Form B.S.M.2 STATEMENTBY MÍCHEÁL Ó CUIRRÍN, Baile ma nGall, Rinn, Dún Garbháin, Co. Puirt Láirge. I was born in Bails na nGall, Ring, Co. Waterford, in the year 1897. My people were farmers, and native Irish speakers, as I am myself. My first connection with the National Movement was in 1913 when I joined the National Volunteers. We had a Company of about twenty-five men, and, when the split in the Volunteers occurred in 1915, every man of the twenty-five men left the National Volunteers and formed a Company of Irish Volunteers. We had at the time only a few guns, a couple of sporting rifles and a shot-gun or two. We got no advance news of the 1916 Rising and first heard about it when the Insurrection was actually 'on foot'. We got no orders to take any action in our district, and, consequently, took no part in the Rising at all. Following 1916, the Ring Company faded out for a while, but was reorganised in mid 1917 at which time I was in business at Wolfhill, Leix. When the Volunteers were reorganised in that area, the late P.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterford City and County Council Scrutiny Report
    Waterford City and County Council Scrutiny Report NOAC Report No. 38 - May 2021 Web: www.noac.ie Email: [email protected] Waterford City County Council Scrutiny Report Chair’s Opening remarks The Local Government Reform Act 2014 The preparation of the profile report also introduced significant changes to a wide range identifies the performance of local authorities of aspects of the local government system, in relevant NOAC reports and provides for including in relation to matters of accountability further examination of the results of these and oversight. In that regard, the Act provided reports. The Scrutiny Process requires time and for the establishment of the National Oversight resources from NOAC and the local authorities and Audit Commission (NOAC) as the statutory in preparation of the profile report and for the body overseeing the local government Stage 1 and Stage 2 meetings. NOAC considers sector. NOAC was established in July 2014 to date that the investment of time and under the 2014 Act to provide independent resources has been worthwhile and necessary. oversight of the local government sector. I have been struck by the welcome and sharing NOAC’s functions are wide ranging, involving of information that has taken place at the the scrutiny of performance generally and meetings. It has provided an opportunity to financial performance specifically, supporting learn, to listen to how the particular local best practice, overseeing implementation of authority operates, the challenges they face, national local government policy and monitoring the plans and ideas that have been developed and evaluating implementation of corporate and gives an opportunity to reflect on what plans, adherence to service level agreements is working well and areas that need to be and public service reform by local government addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Local Government: a Programme for Change
    Diploma in Local Government Studies: 2019/20 (Accredited by NUI) LESSON 1 Local Government Reform © All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ©Institute of Public Administration 2019/20 CONTENTS A INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 B LOCAL GOVERNMENT – ROLE AND PURPOSE ................................................................ 3 C SHORTCOMINGS IN THE IRISH LOCAL GOVERNMENT SYSTEM ......................................5 D LOCAL GOVERNMENT – CHALLENGING TIMES .............................................................. 6 E BETTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT: A PROGRAMME FOR CHANGE ..................................... 9 F IMPLEMENTATION OF BETTER LOCAL GOVERNMENT ................................................... 16 G MODERNISATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT……………………………………………………….21 H STRONGER LOCAL DEMOCRACY -OPTIONS FOR CHANGE………………………………………25 I OECD REVIEW , TRANSFORMING PUBLIC SERVICES, THE MC CARTHY REPORT, COMMISSION ON TAXATION REVIEW and LOCAL GOVERNMENT EFFECIENCY REVIEW.......................................... 26 J PROGRAMME FOR GOVERNMENT 2011/16………………………………………………….…………………. 32 K PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST………………………………………………………………………………………………34 L LOCAL ELECTORAL AREA BOUNDARY COMMITTEE REPORT, 2013………………………………………37 M PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Our Natural Heritage County Waterford Local Biodiversity
    19786_WCC_Cover:WCC_BiodiversityCover 14/08/2008 12:45 Page 1 Waterford County Council, Comhairle Contae Phort Láirge, Civic Offices, Oifgí Cathartha, Dungarvan, Dún Garbhán, Conserving our Natural Heritage Co. Waterford. Co. Phort Láirge. Telephone: 058 22000 Guthán: 058 22000 County Waterford Local Biodiversity Action Plan Fax: 058 42911 Faics: 058 42911 www.waterfordcoco.ie Ag Sabháil ár nOidhreacht Nadúrtha Plean Bithéagsúlachta Chontae Phort Láirge ISBN 978-0-9532022-6-3 2008 - 2013 19786_WCC_Cover:WCC_BiodiversityCover 14/08/2008 12:45 Page 2 Acknowledgements Waterford County Council wishes to acknowledge the generous support of the Heritage Council in the preparation of the plan and also for provision of funding for the implementation of the Biodiversity Action Plan in 2008. Publication compiled by Mieke Mullyaert and Dominic Berridge (former Heritage Officer) and edited by Bernadette Guest, Heritage Officer Use of images kindly permitted by Andrew Kelly, Mike Trewby, Brian White, Dr. Liam Lysaght, Dr. Peter Turner, Dr. Shelia Donegan, Dominic Berridge, Andrew Byrne, Catherine Keena, and Will Woodrow. Publication designed and produced by Intacta Print Ltd . For further information on the Waterford Biodiversity Plan and Biodiversity projects contact the heritage officer at [email protected] or www.waterfordcoco.ie/heritage Cover photographs: Pair of Chough, Pine Marten (Andrew Kelly) Red Squirrel (Brian White), Coastal earth bank (Mike Trewby) Back cover photograph: Panorama of Dungarvan Bay (Bernadette Guest) 19786_WCCBio_Bro:WCC 14/08/2008 12:42 Page 1 Contents A vision for biodiversity in County Waterford 4 1. Introduction 5 The landscape of County Waterford 5 What is biodiversity? 5 Why is biodiversity important? 5 Why a biodiversity action plan? 6 The process by which the plan was developed 7 Plan structure 7 Who is the plan for? 7 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lismore Castle Papers Descriptive List Waterford County Archives
    Lismore Castle Papers LISMORE CASTLE PAPERS DESCRIPTIVE LIST WATERFORD COUNTY ARCHIVES IE/WCA/PP/LISM 1 Lismore Castle Papers Repository Repository Name: Waterford County Archives Identity Statement Reference Code: IE WCA PP LISM Titles: Lismore Castle Estate Papers Dates: [1750]-31 December 1969 Level of Description: Fonds Extent: 208 boxes Creator Creators: Lismore Estate, Irish Estates of the Dukes of Devonshire Administrative History: Lismore Castle was the seat of the Dukes of Devonshire in Ireland. William, the 4th Duke of Devonshire (1720-1764) married Lady Charlotte Boyle (1731-1754), heiress of the 3rd Earl of Burlington and through this marriage the Irish estate mainly situated in counties Waterford and Cork became part of the estates of the Dukes of Devonshire. The Irish estates were administered from Lismore Castle, Lismore, County Waterford by agents living and working from Lismore Castle and responsible for all the Irish estates of the Dukes of Devonshire with a sub-agent located in Bandon to administer the lands and properties located in the areas surrounding Bandon in county Cork. The seat of the Dukes of Devonshire is Chatsworth in Derbyshire, England. The Dukes visited Lismore on occasion, in particular, to hunt and fish but were not permanent residents of Lismore Castle. Instead, the estate was administered by agents who were closely supervised by the Dukes of Devonshire through a series of detailed and, in some cases, daily, correspondence. During the period covered by these papers there were a number of holders of the title of Duke of Devonshire who held the Lismore estates. William Cavendish, 5th Duke of Devonshire (1748-1811) who married Lady Georgiana Spencer; William Spencer Cavendish, the 6th Duke (1790-1858), 2 Lismore Castle Papers known as the “Bachelor Duke”, who extensively remodeled Lismore Castle.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting People First
    Putting People First Action Programme for Effective Local Government Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government October 2012 Putting People First Action Programme for Effective Local Government Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government October 2012 © Government of Ireland 2012 BAILE ÁTHA CLIATH ARNA FHOILSIÚ AG OIFIG AN TSOLÁTHAIR LE CEANNACH DÍREACH ÓN OIFIG DHÍOLTA FOILSEACHÁN RIALTAIS, TEACH SUN ALLIANCE, SRÁID THEACH LAIGHEAN, BAILE ÁTHA CLIATH 2, NÓ TRÍD AN BPOST Ó FOILSEACHÁIN RIALTAIS, AN RANNÓG POST-TRÁCHTA, AONAD 20 PÁIRC MIONDÍOLA COIS LOCHA, CLÁR CHLAINNE MHUIRIS, CONTAE MHAIGH EO (TEIL: 01-6476834/37 NÓ 1890 213434; FAX: 01-6476843 NÓ 094-9378964 ) NÓ TRÍ AON DÍOLTÓIR LEABHAR. ________________________ DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE TO BE PURCHASED DIRECTLY FROM THE GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS SALE OFFICE SUN ALLIANCE HOUSE, MOLESWORTH STREET, DUBLIN 2, OR BY MAIL ORDER FROM GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS, POSTAL TRADE SECTION, UNIT 20 LAKESIDE RETAIL PARK, CLAREMORRIS, CO. MAYO (TEL: 01-6476834/37 OR 1890 213434; FAX: 01-6476843 OR 094 9378964) OR THROUGH ANY BOOKSELLER. _______________________ €10.00 ISBN 9781406427134 October 2012 CONTENTS Foreword by Minister i-ii Summary iii-xiii Part 1: Vision for Local Government in Ireland Chapter 1 – Vision for Local Government and Objectives of Reform ......................................1 Part 2: Local Government Functions - Doing More for the Economy, Enterprise and the Local Community Chapter 2 – A Wider Role ......................................................................................................10 Chapter 3 – Promoting Economic Development and Local Enterprise ................................. 21 Chapter 4 – Local/Community Development and Local Services ......................................... 30 Part 3: A Local Government System for the 21st Century Chapter 5 – Local Government Structures – Issues to be Addressed ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Present Day Waterford County, Ireland
    POWER IN PLACE-NAMES: A CASE STUDY OF PRESENT DAY WATERFORD COUNTY, IRELAND A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Jessica E. Greenwald August 2005 This thesis entitled POWER IN PLACE-NAMES: A CASE STUDY OF PRESENT DAY WATERFORD COUNTY, IRELAND by JESSICA E. GREENWALD has been approved for the Department of Geography and the College of Arts and Sciences by Timothy Anderson Associate Professor of Geography Benjamin M. Ogles Interim Dean, College of Arts and Sciences GREENWALD, JESSICA E. M.A. August 2005. Geography PowerU In Place-Names: A Case Study Of Present Day Waterford County, Ireland (85U pp.) Director of Thesis: Timothy Anderson This study investigates the present day toponymns of Waterford County, Ireland. By using the Land Ordnance Survey of Ireland maps, a database was created with the place names of the county. This study draws upon both traditional and contemporary theories and methods in Geography to understand more fully the meaning behind the place names on a map. In the “traditional” sense, it focuses on investigating changes in the landscape wrought by humans through both time and space (the naming of places). In a more “contemporary” sense, it seeks to understand the power relationships and social struggles reflected in the naming of places and the geography of those names. As such, this study fills a void in the current toponymns and cartographic literature, which are both focused mainly on patterns of diffusion and power struggles in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Clonmel Environs Map Legend
    Clonmel Environs Waterford County Council February 2011 Clonmel Environs County Development Plan 2011-2017 C 27.4 R 31.0 T 27.9 D UN CR V U K N 10 D 10KV 30.4 KV 10 K V 0 F 1 C KNOCKAUNCOURT T V K C 10 R CF LAGANORE UND rea Under C onstruction 10KV A CF Tk 29.1 UND 1 0KV T C LONMEL D N U 27.1 1 0 K v F T C GURTNAFLEUR T T Tks 25.3 Tk T 19.1 24.5 UND Bdy BORO Gort an Oir 18.3 8.1 24.6 1 21.8 17.7 18.6 UND 19.1 U N UND UND D B o r CR o B d Tanks y 16.6 16.6 17.2 R C D N U 10KV MOANMEHILL r S ui dy V er B 0K Riv RO 1 BO CF AD RO KILGAINY LOWER VIS DA 5.6 1 CR V K 0 1 15.6 16.3 16.4 CR CR C S D N U 16.4 18.8 16.8 10Kv C F UND 16.8 CF R C 1 0 K v C S Kilgainy Castle (in ruins) C R S C C R OAN LOWER UND F C U N D ER CONSTRUCTION C F 1 0 K V C F FF C CF F 1 0 K V C R OAN LOWER CF D N U C S 40.6 28.3 D CR 23.6 UN C F OAD 28.1 BEY R D AB OA 23.9 E R ILL 35.7 31.0 EV 21.7 O L F 21.8 C W Bdy BM CR C olev ille Avenue Boro CF F CR C 29.17 U N 42.3 D 19.3 19.3 Tks Moore's Island CR D A OLDBRIDGE O 22.6 R SR C A F P C CR W R iv S T 23.4 e GR EEN LA r Boro Bdy NE 27.1 D 33.3 OA V 39.8 UND ND R K 29.4 U EN 18.7 RAHEEN 1 V 8 HE T 0 K 3 RA K 10 INNISLOUNAGH CR CW V AD F RO 24.4 W eirv iew Villas E 38.3 W PA U G S N 41.2 S LD D D u O I 18.3 ir F 2 R 8.3 B o Moore's Island B SPA C Bor B U 53.0 d o y N r U D 18.5 C 50.6 o CW dy D ND W B L N U ro o B B D O d y v School K 58.7 23.9 0 1 M W C 59.2 O R C F Mountain View S W U F N 18.0 T 2 A ESB 7.2 D ND d N U I n U N Po 29.2 F Station 18.1 1 T W S F 18.2 UIR C 0 CRCRCR 25.8 W W K V W C ER IV 27.4 C 28.8 R E R
    [Show full text]
  • South East Economic Development Strategy (SEEDS)
    Tithe an Oireachtais Houses of the Oireachtas An Comhchoiste um Poist, Fiontair agus Nuálaíocht Joint Committee on Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation Straitéis Forbartha Eacnamaíochta an Oirdheiscirt 2013 -2023 South East Economic Development Strategy (SEEDS) 2013 -2023 Cuir síos na síolta – Cuir fás faoin Eacnamaíocht Plant the SEEDS – Grow the Economy JEI **** 2 South East Economic Development Strategy Page | 2 3 South East Economic Development Strategy Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................... 5 Chairman’s Foreword ...................................................................................................................... 7 Rapporteur’s Introduction (Senator David Cullinane) .................................................................... 9 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Introduction and rationale for the report ......................................................... 11 1.2 Key Facts ....................................................................................................... 13 1.3 A vision for the Southeast .............................................................................. 14 1.4 Key Actions and Interventions ........................................................................ 16 1.5 Structure and Implementation .......................................................................
    [Show full text]