Heliophysics Background by Katie Whitman Center for Computational Heliophysics in Hawaii (C2H2)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heliophysics Background by Katie Whitman Center for Computational Heliophysics in Hawaii (C2H2) Heliophysics Background By Katie Whitman Center for Computational Heliophysics in Hawaii (C2H2) http://c2h2.ifa.hawaii.edu History of Solar Discoveries Sunspots The first recorded observations of sunspots were made by Chinese astronomers. The two earliest records of sunspot observations are found in a Chinese book, the Book of Changes, dating back to about 800BC or earlier. Much more complete Chinese records began in 165BC. (Source: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~werne/eos/text/galileo.html) The first sunspot drawing that still exists (above) can be found in a book called the Chronicles of John of Worcester. The observation dates to 8 December 1128, and shows the sunspot's umbra and penumbra. The accompanying text reads, "...from morning to evening, appeared something like two black circles within the disk of the Sun, the one in the upper part being bigger, the other in the lower part smaller. As shown on the drawing." (Source: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~werne/eos/text/galileo.html) Observations of the Sun through telescopes began in 1610. Galileo noticed dark spots on the Sun one misty evening at sunset and became curious. Galileo used these spots to calculate the rotation rate of the Sun, coming up with a rotation period of about 25 days. Astronomers throughout Europe were doing the same thing with their telescopes, tracking and recording these dark blotches marring the solar surface. (Sun Kings, p. 28) But what were sunspots? Christoph Scheiner from Germany thought that they were silhouettes of undiscovered planets. Galileo showed that this could not be true because of the strange way that sunspots moved. Galileo reasoned that this was the behavior of something affixed to the surface of a spinning ball. He could also see sunspots growing and shrinking in size, behavior that could not be attributed to a planet. The issue of sunspots and what they were provoked a somewhat emotional response at the time, as the prevailing belief was that the heavens were perfect and unchanging, a reflection of God. Galileo thought they were dark clouds in the solar atmosphere, other astronomers thought that it was dark slag (the leftovers from smelting metal) on the top of a gigantic natural furnace. In the 1700’s, Newton wrote that the Sun and Stars were “great Earths vehemently hot.” Leading people to think that there was a planet inside the Sun. People then thought that the spots were smoke preceding volcanic eruptions, or mountain revealed by the ebb and flow of the Sun’s fiery oceans. It was difficult to observe the Sun through the telescope, as it was likely an astronomer could go blind if not done properly. Larger telescope focused more light, even making it harder. William Herschel made an unpolished mirror that naturally scattered light, allowing for his solar telescopes to hold larger mirrors and see higher levels of detail. He saw that Sun’s surface looked more like an orange peel and that the black spots were actually depressions in the surface. This lead him to believe that they were openings, allowing astronomers to see the dark surface of the Sun below. (The Sun Kings, p. 30) He thought that the Sun’s atmosphere consisted of a transparent layer and a bright layer. He didn’t know why the atmosphere might glow, but he pointed to the aurora seen on Earth. He also thought the Sun was richly stocked with inhabitants. He also used the fact that mountain climbers experienced a drop in temperature as they increased in elevation (close to the Sun) to assert that the Sun was not actually hot. The Sun is Hot Eventually Herschel’s mind was changed when he tried placing different colors of glass in the light path of his telescope in an effort to reduce the light. He noticed that red glass stopped most of the light, but made the eye feel intolerable hot. (p. 34) Trying different colors lead him to the realization that not all colors created equal quantities of heat, which was the prevailing belief at the time. Some scientists believed he was a rambling fool, but after a controlled experiment in which Herschel displayed the Sun’s light on the wall through a prism and measured the temperatures of the different colors (while another thermometer in the room measured the ambient temperature), did people believe him. He even showed that the hottest part of the spectrum was an invisible area next to the red color. Image Source: http://www.rudraveena.org/images/spectrum.jpg In 1814, Joseph von Fraunhofer rediscovered the dark lines in the Sun’s spectrum. Inventing the spectral grating in 1823, Fraunhofer cataloged solar spectral lines with great precision (The Sun Kings p. 93‐93). Fraunhofer died at just 37 years old, but John Herschel (son of William Herschel) and William Fox Talbot realized that elements gave off unique spectral patterns. Kirchhoff and Bunsen created pure samples for flame tests. In 1859, Kirchhoff figured out that a hot solid dense object will give off a continuous spectrum of light (image below); a hot tenuous gas will produce an emission line spectrum; and a hot object with a cooler tenuous gas around it will create a spectrum with dark absorption lines. Because they identified the elements on the Sun’s surface and it was well known that these metals could only be in a gas form at very high temperatures, the Sun had to be incredibly hot (The Sun Kings, p. 95 – 97). Image Source: https://www.e‐ education.psu.edu/astro801/book/export/html/1549 Solar Variability Going through his records in 1801, Herschel noticed that the number of sunspots seemed to come and go. He looked through scientific journals and identified possible periods over which he saw this variability. (The Sun Kings, p. 36) The Sun and Climate or How Sunspots Affect the Sun’s Temperature Herschel became interested in the Sun’s affect on climate. He didn’t have long‐term solar records, but he had a genius stroke to look at the price of wheat as a proxy for temperatures. Around 1802, he thought that years with many sunspots (when the Sun was supposedly cooler) would have higher wheat prices, but he actually found the opposite. (The Sun Kings, p. 37) Herschel then flipped his original idea about sunspot, now proclaiming that transparent clouds of hot gas were welling up in the Sun and the sunspots were the result of this emission. Those in the scientific community either did not listen or chose to criticize and even ridicule him. The Edinborough Review stated that Herschel’s speculations were “all eclipsed by the grand absurdity which he has there committed; in his hasty and erroneous theory concerning the influence of the solar spots on the price of grain. Since the publication of Gulliver’s voyage to Laputa, nothing so ridiculous has ever been offered to the world.” The Beginning of the Sun­Earth Magnetic Connection In 1802, Alexander von Humboldt was traveling in Peru, concerned about the effects that land clearing and agriculture had on the climate. In Venezuela, he arrived at a community that was wondering why the water levels in their lake were dropping. Humboldt investigated and found that the forests they had been clearing helped trap moisture and increase rainfall. Humboldt was exploring, but he also had the position of the Earth’s magnetic equator. He measured the orientation of the Earth’s magnetic equator at the geographic equator. Back in Berlin in 1806, Humboldt began monitoring the daily movement of magnetic needles. On the 21st of December, Humboldt saw his magnetic needles varying wildly and noted that aurora were in the sky. In the 1740’s, Hoirtier and Celsius had observed this same phenomenon. In 1827, Humboldt organized a series of magnetic observatories around the globe (p. 52). He convinced Carl Friedrich Gauss to participate in the project. Humboldt also worked with Russia and the British Empire, which held land across the world. Colonel Edward Sabine was also greatly interested and joined the effort. He tirelessly fought for expeditions to the southern hemisphere. In 1840, magnetic stations were founded at Greenwich, Dublin, Toronto, St. Helena in the South Atlantic, the Cape of Good Hope, Van Dieman’s Land, Madras, Simla, Bombay, and Singapore. (The Sun Kings p. 57) Heinrich Schwabe began observing sunspots every day since 1825. He noticed a pattern and, by 1843, had enough to see a repeating pattern (The Sun Kings, p. 69). Humboldt recognized the importance of being able to predict sunspots and published it in his book Kosmos. Sabine’s wife was translating this book and George Sabine noticed the patter immediately. He saw that magnetic storms and sunspot numbers moved in lockstep. (The Sun Kings, p. 69) In 1852, Edward Sabine showed that global magnetic fluctuations are synchronized with the Sun’s 11 year cycle. (The Sun, Earth and Sky) Solar Differential Rotation Richard Carrington of England set up his own observatory at Redhill, Surrey. He was an extremely careful observer whose northern star catalog was published by the British admiralty with public funds because of its importance for navigation. Starting in 1853, Carrington applied his detail‐oriented technique to observing sunspots, trying to determine the Sun’s rotation period once and for all, since astronomers could not seem to agree on a value, finding somewhere between 25 – 28 days (The Sun Kings, p. 77). In 1858, Carrington had enough information to show that spots at higher latitudes moved more slowly than those at the equator. This differential rotation was proof that the Sun was a gaseous body and not a solid one.
Recommended publications
  • Transactions 1905
    THE Royal Astronomical Society of Canada TRANSACTIONS FOR 1905 (INCLUDING SELECTED PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS) EDITED BY C. A CHANT. TORONTO: ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL PRINT, 1906. The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. THE Royal Astronomical Society of Canada TRANSACTIONS FOR 1905 (INCLUDING SELECTED PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS) EDITED BY C. A CHANT. TORONTO: ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL PRINT, 1906. TABLE OF CONTENTS. The Dominion Observatory, Ottawa (Frontispiece) List of Officers, Fellows and A ssociates..................... - - 3 Treasurer’s R eport.....................--------- 12 President’s Address and Summary of Work ------ 13 List of Papers and Lectures, 1905 - - - - ..................... 26 The Dominion Observatory at Ottawa - - W. F. King 27 Solar Spots and Magnetic Storms for 1904 Arthur Harvey 35 Stellar Legends of American Indians - - J. C. Hamilton 47 Personal Profit from Astronomical Study - R. Atkinson 51 The Eclipse Expedition to Labrador, August, 1905 A. T. DeLury 57 Gravity Determinations in Labrador - - Louis B. Stewart 70 Magnetic and Meteorological Observations at North-West River, Labrador - - - - R. F. Stupart 97 Plates and Filters for Monochromatic and Three-Color Photography of the Corona J. S. Plaskett 89 Photographing the Sun and Moon with a 5-inch Refracting Telescope . .......................... D. B. Marsh 108 The Astronomy of Tennyson - - - - John A. Paterson 112 Achievements of Nineteenth Century Astronomy , L. H. Graham 125 A Lunar Tide on Lake Huron - - - - W. J. Loudon 131 Contributions...............................................J. Miller Barr I. New Variable Stars - - - - - - - - - - - 141 II. The Variable Star ξ Bootis -------- 143 III. The Colors of Helium Stars - - - ..................... 144 IV. A New Problem in Solar Physics ------ 146 Stellar Classification ------ W. Balfour Musson 151 On the Possibility of Fife in Other Worlds A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maunder Minimum and the Variable Sun-Earth Connection
    The Maunder Minimum and the Variable Sun-Earth Connection (Front illustration: the Sun without spots, July 27, 1954) By Willie Wei-Hock Soon and Steven H. Yaskell To Soon Gim-Chuan, Chua Chiew-See, Pham Than (Lien+Van’s mother) and Ulla and Anna In Memory of Miriam Fuchs (baba Gil’s mother)---W.H.S. In Memory of Andrew Hoff---S.H.Y. To interrupt His Yellow Plan The Sun does not allow Caprices of the Atmosphere – And even when the Snow Heaves Balls of Specks, like Vicious Boy Directly in His Eye – Does not so much as turn His Head Busy with Majesty – ‘Tis His to stimulate the Earth And magnetize the Sea - And bind Astronomy, in place, Yet Any passing by Would deem Ourselves – the busier As the Minutest Bee That rides – emits a Thunder – A Bomb – to justify Emily Dickinson (poem 224. c. 1862) Since people are by nature poorly equipped to register any but short-term changes, it is not surprising that we fail to notice slower changes in either climate or the sun. John A. Eddy, The New Solar Physics (1977-78) Foreword By E. N. Parker In this time of global warming we are impelled by both the anticipated dire consequences and by scientific curiosity to investigate the factors that drive the climate. Climate has fluctuated strongly and abruptly in the past, with ice ages and interglacial warming as the long term extremes. Historical research in the last decades has shown short term climatic transients to be a frequent occurrence, often imposing disastrous hardship on the afflicted human populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Le Charles Lewis Brook: Third
    Charles Lewis Brook: third Director of the BAA Variable Star Section Jeremy Shears Charles Lewis Brook, MA, FRAS, FRMetS (1855−1939) served as Director of the BAA Variable Star Section from 1910 to 1921. During this time he was not interested merely in collecting the observations of the members (to which he also contributed), but he also spent considerable time analys- ing the data and preparing numerous publications on the findings. This paper discusses Brook’s life and work, with a particular focus on his con- tribution to variable star astronomy. Introduction with a particular fo- cus on his contri- bution to variable Charles Lewis Brook (1855−1939; Figures 1 and 2) was the star astronomy. It third Director of the BAA Variable Star Section (VSS) serv- draws on four sepa- ing from 1910 to 1921. As well as being an enthusiastic ob- rate obituaries: one server of variable stars, he undertook the analysis of vari- written for the BAA able star observations submitted by others, writing many by a later VSS Di- papers and memoirs on the subject. His astronomical inter- rector, W .M. Lindley (1891−1972),2 one written for the Royal ests were not confined to variables and he observed a range Astronomical Society by Annie (A. S. D.) Maunder (1868− of other astronomical objects. In addition to astronomy, he 1947),3 one for the Royal Meteorological Society4 and a brief was an active meteorologist. one published in the Huddersfield Examiner.5 In addition I Brook led a busy professional life as a Director of the have reviewed Brook’s published work, especially his pa- thread and textile company Messrs J.
    [Show full text]
  • The April Membership Meeting Will Be Held on Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 7:30 Pm at the Adventure Science Center
    The Newsletter of the Barnard-Seyfert Astronomical Society - Organized in 1928 APRIL 2007 The April membership meeting will be held on Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 7:30 pm at the Adventure Science Center On Thursday, April 19, 2007 we will hold our regularly scheduled membership meet- ing at the Adventure Science Center. Our speaker this month will be our own Lonnie Puter- baugh. He will focus on two topics for his presentation. The first topic he will address are the Outreach Awards offered by the Astronomical League. These awards are also known as the AstroOscars. This is a new category of awards currently offered by the Astronomical League and are designed to recognize individuals who have made a substantial impact on public edu- cation and enrichment in the science of Astronomy. His second topic will be Mount Palomar Observatory. Mount Palomar Observatory is located in North San Diego County, California and is owned and operated by the California Institute of Technology. Lonnie will discuss the features of the world-class observatory, fo- cusing on the impressive equipment and advancements in Astronomical Research that the ob- servatory has achieved throughout its history. Message from the President Page 2 In last month’s “President’s Message”, I spoke about the wonderful job JanaRuth Ford and her program committee is doing to arrange the programs for our monthly membership meeting and the fact that Steve Wheeler is now the BSAS coordinator of Star Parties. This month I want to talk about the TNSP07 and the job Board Member, Keith Burneson is working to cause this event to happen.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNIE SCOTT DILL MAUNDER (1868–1947)| Solar Scientist
    HIDDEN GEMS AND FORGOTTEN PEOPLE ANNIE SCOTT DILL MAUNDER (1868–1947)| Solar Scientist Annie Scott Dill Russell was born on 14 April 1868 in Strabane, Co. Tyrone, the second of three children and the younger daughter of William Andrew Russell (1824–1899), minister of the Presbyterian Church in the town, and his wife, Hester (Hessy) Nesbitt Russell, née Dill. She was educated at home and at the Ladies' Collegiate School (later Victoria College), Belfast. She entered Girton College, Cambridge, at the age of eighteen on an open scholarship and took Part One of the mathematical tripos in 1889 with second-class honours. After a year as a mathematics mistress at the ladies' high school in Jersey she obtained a post at the Royal Greenwich Observatory in September 1891 as a ‘lady computer’, and was assigned to the solar department under Edward Walter Maunder, a solar astronomer. ‘Lady computers’ were successfully used at Harvard’s observatory, but previous to Maunder’s hiring, the “computers” name was reserved for teenage boys or women without college training. Being a “computer” was considered the lowest scientific post: the pay was poor and the work was generally considered tedious. Annie’s job consisted of examining and measuring daily sunspot photographs, and through this work, she became an expert in solar astronomy. Prior to meeting Annie Walter Maunder had worked to include women in astronomical societies, and therefore his support of her as a scientist was not unusual. Annie spent four years on the Greenwich staff, and resigned on 31 October 1895 before her marriage to Maunder on 28 December.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Astronomical Handbook for 1908
    T h e Ca n a d i a n A stronomical H a n d b o o k FOR 1908 PUBLISHED BY THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA E d i t e d b y C. A. CHANT SECOND YEAR OF PUBLICATION TORONTO 198 C o l l e g e S t r e e t P r i n t e d f o r t h e S o c i e t y 1907 T h e Ca n a d i a n A stronomical H a n d b o o k FOR 1908 T h e Ca n a d ia n A stronomical H a n d b o o k FOR 1908 PUBLISHED BY THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA E d i t e d b y C. A. CHANT SECOND YEAR OF PUBLICATION TORONTO 198 C o l l e g e S t r e e t P r i n t e d f o r t h e S o c i e t y 1907 CONTENTS Page Preface.......................................................................... 5 Symbols and Abbreviations ....................................... 7 Chronological Eras and Cycles.................................... 8 Fixed and Movable Festivals, Etc.............................. 8 Standard Time..................................................... 9 Calendar for the Year . 9 to 33 Geographical Positions of Points in Canada............. 34 Magnetic Elements for Toronto, 1901-1906............... 36 The Solar System : Eclipses of Sun and Moon................................... 37 Principal Elements of the Solar System............ 39 Satellites of the Solar System............................. 40 The Planets in 1908, with Maps......................... 41 Meridian Passage of Five Planets..............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Solar Cycle and Why It Matters for Climate David Whitehouse
    THE NEXT SOLAR CYCLE And why it matters for climate David Whitehouse The Global Warming Policy Foundation Note 22 Contents Summary 1 About the author 1 Introduction 3 Solar variability 3 The Little Ice Age 4 Blaming sunspots 4 A sunspot cycle 5 The Maunder Minimum 6 A magnetic cycle 7 Cycle 24 8 Cycle 25 9 Coda 11 Notes 11 About the Global Warming Policy Foundation 12 The Next Solar Cycle and Why it Matters for Climate David Whitehouse Note 22, The Global Warming Policy Foundation © Copyright 2020, The Global Warming Policy Foundation ‘Any coincidence is always worth notic- ing. You can throw it away later if it is only a coincidence.’ Agatha Christie, Nemesis. Summary Predictions for the next solar cycle – Cycle 25 – range from very low activity to stronger than Cycle 24. The National Oceanic and Atmos- pheric Administration’s Solar Cycle Prediction Panel says there is no evidence for another period of very low activity, as in the Maunder Minimum of the late-17th and early-18th cen- tury, which could have an important effect on factors that govern the Earth’s climate. Never- theless, there is no consensus and it remains a possibility. About the author The science editor of the GWPF, Dr David- Whitehouse is a writer, journalist, broadcast- er and the author of six critically acclaimed books. He holds a PhD in astrophysics from the Jodrell Bank Radio Observatory. He was the BBC’s Science Correspondent and Science Editor of BBC News Online. Among his many awards are the European Internet Journalist of the Year, the first Arthur C Clarke Award and an unprecedented five Netmedia awards.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the APST for the Year 1894
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE Astronomical and Physical Society of Toronto, FOR THE YEAR 1894, INCLUDING FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT. PRICE ONE DOLLAR. TORONTO: ROWSELL & HUTCHISON, Printers to the Society. 1895. CHARLES CARPMAEL, M. A. (CANTAB.) TRANSACTIONS OF THE Astronomical and Physical Society of Toronto, FOR THE YEAR 1894, INCLUDING FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT. PRICE ONE DOLLAR. TORONTO: ROWSELL & HUTCHISON, Printers to the Society. 1895. CORRIGENDA. Transactions, 1S90, page 29, line S from bottom, for “ Jupiter ” read “ Neptune.” Transactions, 1891, page 5, line 11 from top, for “ B.C. 380 ” read “ B.C. 310.” Transactions, 1893, page 59, line 9 from top, for “ 7 p.m. ” read “ 11.15 p.m.” Transactions, 1893, page 67, line 3 from bottom, value of comp, log n' should be “ 2.2132633.” Transactions, 1894, page 16, line 3 from top, for “ 1.500th ” read “ l - 500th.” “ “ “ line 5, for “ 1.250th ” read “ l-250th.” Transactions, 1894, page 31, line 14 from top, for “ two angles” read “ three angles. ” TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE. Officers ............................................. .......................................... V Council ............................................. .......................................... V Life Members..................................... .......................................... V Honourary Members ...................... .......................................... VI Corresponding Members................... .......................................... VI Active Members and their Addresses .................................... VII Associate
    [Show full text]
  • Annie Maunder (1868–1947) and British Women Astronomers at the Dawn of Professional Astronomy
    BJHS, 2000, 33, 67–84 Obligatory amateurs: Annie Maunder (1868–1947) and British women astronomers at the dawn of professional astronomy MARILYN BAILEY OGILVIE* Abstract. This paper explores the careers of several British women astronomers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. I postulate that the only category of scientific practice open to most of these women was that of an ‘amateur’. They would have become professionals had they had the opportunity but since they were barred from professional status they used their talents to promote the importance of amateur science. I propose the term ‘obligatory amateur’ for these women who, unlike men, were unable to choose amateur or professional status. I explore this concept of a ‘gendered’ amateurism through the life and works of Annie Maunder, with references to British women astronomers contemporary with her. Although historians of science usually agree on the dangers of using terms such as ‘amateur’ and ‘professional’ indiscriminately in their writings, there are still some occasions when the labels can be useful. Notions about what constitutes an ‘amateur’, for example, are particularly relevant when investigating the roles of enthusiasts for whom science was a vocation rather than a livelihood. Long ago, David Allen’s Naturalist in Britain established that while professionalization galloped ahead in the second half of the nineteenth century, amateurs continued to thrive in the observational sciences such as botany and ornithology. As many scholars have indicated, this was a complex, reciprocal process subject to continued negotiation. Yet it is clear that as the nineteenth century waned, the sciences in general retreated from a situation where amateur and professional shared common scientific goals and reaped similar benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Stars and Satellites Mary Brück
    Mary Brück Women in Early British and Irish Astronomy Stars and Satellites 123 Women in Early British and Irish Astronomy Mary Brück Women in Early British and Irish Astronomy Stars and Satellites Mary Brück ISBN 978-90-481-2472-5 e-ISBN 978-90-481-2473-2 DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2473-2 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2009931554 c Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) For my sisters (nees´ Conway) Eithne, Meadhbh and Aoife Foreword The role of women in the growth of science has become an important area of modern historical scholarly research. And as far as the study of the role of women in astron- omy is concerned, Dr. Mary Br¨uck is an established and illustrious pioneer, with an international reputation and acclaimed books and articles already to her credit. Her present book, Stars and Satellites, brings together many figures who worked over a 300-year time scale, and whose relationship with astronomy ranged from informed assistants to independent researchers to major writers and interpreters of contem- porary astronomy to, eventually, paid professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions 1902
    THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA SELECTED PAPERS a n d PROCEEDINGS 1902 A N D 1903 EDITED BY ARTHUR HARVEY, F.R.S.C. TORONTO: Z. M. COLLINS, PUBLISHER TO THE SOCIETY. 1904. The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada T h e L a t e GEORGE EDWARD LUMSDEN, F.R.A.S. MEMBER OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF FRANCE, HONORARY MEMBER OF THE ASTRONOMICL SOCIETY OF MEXICO, PRESIDENT OF THE TORONTO ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 1900 AND 1901. THE Ro y a l Astronomical So c iety OF C a n a d a SELECTED PAPERS a n d PROCEEDINGS 1902 A N D 1903 EDITED BY ARTHUR HARVEY, F.R.S.C. TORONTO: Z. M. COLLINS, PUBLISHER TO THE SOCIETY. 1904. THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA Officers, 1904 Honorary President—The Hon. RICHARD HARCOURT, M.A., LL.D., K.C., M.P.P., MINISTER OF EDUCATION, ONTARIO. President—C. A. CHANT, M.A., (Tor.),Ph.D. (Har.), Lecturer in Physics, Toronto University. First Vice-President—ALFRED T. De LURY, M.A., Associate Professor of Mathematics and Astronomy, Toronto University. Second Vice-President—W. BALFOUR MUSSON, 22 Park Road, Toronto. Treasurer—J. EDWARD MAYBEE, M.E., 103 Bay St., Toronto. Secretary—J. R. COLLINS, 131 Bay St., Toronto. Recorder—MISS ELSIE A. DENT, 17 St. James Ave. Librarian—ALFRED McFARLANE, M.A., Toronto. Curator—ROBERT S. DUNCAN, 516 Ontario Street. Other Members of Council Honoris Causa : Elected: A. ERVINS, Past President. A. F. MILLER. 280 Carlton L. W. SMITH, D.C.R., K.C., Street, Toronto. Past President. Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Theological Perspectives There Were a Lot of It, Would Support the Second View More Than the First
    272 describes as “undeniably romantic but perhaps true nevertheless”. This is the vision of a “self-organizing and self-complexifying universe, governed by The Search for Extra-terrestrial Life: ingenious laws that encourage matter to evolve towards life and conscious- ness”[Davies 1998, 256]. To find life elsewhere in the universe, especially if Historical and Theological Perspectives there were a lot of it, would support the second view more than the first. Faced with such a choice, I suspect that many religious thinkers might * John Hedley Brooke begin to feel uncomfortable. The nihilistic worldview that Davies associates with orthodox science would be particularly objectionable. But the alternative might also be unattractive. The idea of “ingenious” laws might be suggestive Resumo of divine ingenuity. Yet to speak of a self-organizing and a self-complexifying universe seems to imply a completely autonomous system operating Desde o início, as ideias acerca da vida extra-terrestre continham independently of any transcendent power. Faced with the choice Davies significados metafisicos e religiosos. Estudos históricos, como os de describes, a Christian theologian might feel compelled to embrace extra- Steven Dick e Michael Crowe, mostraram que as referências ao extra- -terrestre ajudavam a tornar a astronomia mais atractiva, sendo terrestrial life, in order to escape from the pointless universe of “orthodox discutidos exaustivamente. A confiança na existência de vida inteligente science”. Yet to do so would bring its own problems. Within the Christian algures no universo não é uma descoberta recente, pois em meados do tradition the gravitational pull of anthropocentric concepts has been very século XIX o filósofo escocês Thomas Dick calculou a população total strong.
    [Show full text]