DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological and Water Quality Study of the Black River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological and Water Quality Study of the Black River Basin State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Biological and Water Quality Study of The Black River Basin Lorain and Medina Counties HydropsychidCaddisfly (Hydropsyche sp.) Greenside Darter (Etheostoma blenniodes) March 31, 1999 Bob Taft, Governor Christopher Jones, Director State of Ohio EPA P.O. Box 1049, Lazarus Government Center., 122 S. Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 MAS/1998-11-4 Black River Basin TSD March 31, 1999 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Black River Basin, 1997 Lorain and Media Counties March 31, 1999 OEPA Technical Report Number MAS/1998-11-4 Bob Taft, Govenor Chris Jones, Director State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency P.O. Box 1049, Lazarus Government Center 122 S. Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 MAS/1998-11-4 Black River Basin TSD March 31, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE TO USERS ......................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................vi FORWARD .............................................................vii INTRODUCTION ........................................................1 SUMMARY .............................................................1 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................3 Black River Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................3 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................3 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................3 French Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................5 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................5 Future Monitoring Concerns and Other Recommendations ..................3 East Branch Black River Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................5 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................6 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................6 East Fork East Branch Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................6 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................6 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................6 Willow Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................7 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................7 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................7 West Branch Black River Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................7 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................7 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................7 Plum Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................7 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................8 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................8 Beaver Creek Status of Aquatic Life Uses ...........................................8 Status of Non-aquatic Life Uses ........................................8 Other Recommendations and Future Monitoring Concerns ..................8 Use Designations Table .................................................11 ii MAS/1998-11-4 Black River Basin TSD March 31, 1999 STUDY AREA ..........................................................13 METHODS .............................................................22 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............................................26 Pollutant Loadings ....................................................26 City of Elyria WWTP ................................................26 USS/Kobe Steel ....................................................29 City of Lorain (East-side) WWTP ......................................42 Village of Grafton WWTP ............................................44 Brentwood Lake WWTP ..............................................47 Eaton Estates WWTP ................................................48 Village of Lodi WWTP ...............................................49 North Ridgeville WWTP ..............................................51 City of Amherst WWTP ..............................................53 Spills ...............................................................55 Fish Kills ............................................................55 Surface Water Quality ................................................56 East Fork East Branch ...............................................57 East Branch .......................................................57 Willow Creek ......................................................62 West Branch .......................................................64 French Creek ......................................................65 Black River ........................................................68 Beaver Creek ......................................................88 Sediment Quality .....................................................91 East Branch .......................................................91 Willow Creek ......................................................91 French Creek ......................................................92 Black River ........................................................92 Surface Water Quality Trends ..........................................98 East Fork East Branch ...............................................98 East Branch .......................................................99 East Branch and West Branch Compared ................................101 Black River (Free Flowing) ...........................................103 Black River (Lacustuary) .............................................103 Black River Ambient Monitoring (1992- 1997) ............................107 French Creek ......................................................109 Beaver Creek ......................................................110 Physical Habitat for Aquatic Life .......................................111 Biological Assessment: Macroinvertebrate Community (1977 -1997) ..........115 Black River ........................................................115 Black River Lacustuary ..............................................115 French Creek ......................................................115 iii MAS/1998-11-4 Black River Basin TSD March 31, 1999 East Branch .......................................................115 East Fork East Branch ...............................................116 Willow Creek ......................................................116 West Branch .......................................................116 Plum Creek ........................................................116 Beaver Creek ......................................................116 Biological Assessment: Fish Community (1977 - 1997) ......................125 Black River ........................................................125 Black River Lacustuary ..............................................125 East Branch .......................................................133 East Fork East Branch ...............................................135 French Creek ......................................................135 Willow Creek ......................................................136 West Branch .......................................................136 Plum Creek ........................................................136 Beaver Creek ......................................................137 Overall Trends .......................................................137 Public Lakes and Reservoirs ............................................140 References ...........................................................158 Appendix tables containing results from chemical grab samples and biological sampling are available electronically on the Internet at http://chagrin.epa.ohio.gov/. iv MAS/1998-11-4 Black River Basin TSD March 31, 1999 NOTICE TO USERS Ohio EPA incorporated biological criteria into the Ohio Water Quality Standards (WQS; Ohio Administrative Code 3745-1) regulations in February 1990 (effective May 1990). These criteria consist of numeric values for the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) and Modified Index of Well-Being (MIwb), both of which are based on fish assemblage data, and the Invertebrate Community Index (ICI), which is based on macroinvertebrate assemblage data. Criteria for each index are specified for each of Ohio's five ecoregions (as described by Omernik 1987), and are further organized by organism group, index, site type, and aquatic life use designation. These criteria, along with the existing chemical and whole effluent toxicity evaluation methods and criteria, figure prominently in the monitoring and assessment of Ohio’s surface water resources. The following documents support the use of biological criteria by outlining the rationale for using biological information, the methods by which the biocriteria were derived and calculated, the field methods by which sampling must be conducted, and the process for evaluating results: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 1987a. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Volume I. The role of biological data in water quality assessment. Div. Water Qual. Monit. & Assess., Surface Water Section, Columbus, Ohio. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 1987b. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Volume II. Users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters. Div. Water Qual. Monit. & Assess., Surface Water Section, Columbus, Ohio. Ohio Environmental Protection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lorain, Ohio: a Study in Urban Geography*
    THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. XXXV MAY, 1935 No. 3 LORAIN, OHIO: A STUDY IN URBAN GEOGRAPHY* R. B. FROST, Oberlin College TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 140 PART I. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT A. REGIONAL ASPECTS 1. Lake Erie and the Great Lakes Chain 142 2. The Lake Plain 143 (a) Geological Section 3. Appalachian Plateau 145 (a) Northern Glaciated Section (b) Unglaciated Section 4. Climate and Aboriginal Forest Cover 146 B. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 1. Black River and its Estuary 148 2. Lake Erie Shoreline 150 PART II. SEQUENT STAGES OF HUMAN OCCUPANCE (1755-1894) A. THE LANDSCAPE DURING THE INDIAN PERIOD 1. Indian Occupance 151 2. Indian Removal 152 B. THE LANDSCAPE DURING THE PIONEER PERIOD 1. Interim Period 153 2. Village Birth 154 3. Pioneer Developments 155 C. LANDSCAPE DURING THE PERIOD OF GROWTH 1. Agri-functional Character of the Village 158 2. Durand Survey 159 3. Village Extensions 160 4. Population Increase 160 D. A DECADENT VILLAGE 1. Effects of Railroad Expansion on Charleston 161 2. Decline of Population 162 3. Trade Decline 162 4. Persistence of Certain Industries 164 *Publication of this paper is made possible by a grant-in-aid from the trustees of the Research Fund of the Ohio Academy of Science. 139 140 R. B. FROST Vol. XXXV E. THE LANDSCAPE OF THE EARLY INDUSTRIAL PERIOD: A REVIVAL 1. Functional Changes 166 PART III. MODERN LANDSCAPE (1894-1932) A. RECENT GROWTH AND EXTENSION OF LORAIN 1. Landscape Characteristics 173 2. Present Plan 176 B. ELEMENTS OF THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE 1. Heavy Industrial 182 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. Natural History
    CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY —THE WILDERNESS THAT GREETED THE FIRST SETTLERS The land one sees today traveling through northern Ohio took gone. Thus, some 14,000 years ago as the last glacier receded millions of years to form. We can see evidence of tropical sea into the Lake Erie basin, the first Native Americans arrived and reefs on the Lake Erie Islands and deep ocean sediments here in began to utilize the natural resources that these natural processes the cliffs of the Black River. Ohio was just south of the equator had produced. at that time, some 350 million years ago, and over the millennia The natural history of Sheffield encompasses all those natural has migrated northward to its present position. Mountain features and processes of the environment that greeted the Native building to the east eventually raised the sea floor from under Americans, and later the pioneers, when they first arrived in the waves and erosion by streams, and later glacial ice, began Sheffield. To be sure, the landscape was a magnificent wilderness to sculpture the land. At the same time plants and animals were to the settlers, but it needed to be “tamed” in order to support evolving and began to populate the new land once the ice was the newcomers. Ice formation on the shale bluff of the Black River north of Garfield Bridge (2005). 1 BICENTENNIAL HISTORY OF SHEFFIELD TOPOGRAPHY Regional Physiography The topography of an area is the configuration of the land Physiography refers to the physical features or landforms of surface, including its relief [vertical differences in elevation of a region.
    [Show full text]
  • Black River Watershed Action Plan December 30, 2011
    Black River Watershed Action Plan December 30, 2011 Written By: Christina Znidarsic Former Black River Watershed Coordinator Lorain County Community Development Department (Sections I through- IV) And Coldwater Consulting, LLC With input from Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. and the Lorain County Community Development Department (Sections V through IX) With technical assistance from: Christopher Alvarado, CCPC Marty Rowe, Lorain County Auditor’s Office Jim Boddy, LCGHD Nancy Funni, Lorain SWCD Ryan Kemper, NRCS Karl Schneider, NRCS Tom Holmes, ODNR Matt Adkins, ODNR OCM Brian George, ODNR OCM Steve Lewis, ODNR OCM Ted Conlin, Ohio EPA Bill Zawiski, Ohio EPA Liz Mather, WRLC Special Thanks to: Joe Reitz, Avon Lake Engineering Dept. Mike McNutt, Columbus Board of Health Betty Blair, Lorain County Commissioner Col. Matthew Nahorn, New Indian Ridge Museum Cheryl Wolfe, Oberlin College Greg Nageotte, ODNR Rosa Garcia-Gee, Sheffield Lake SUAB 1 Black River Watershed Action Plan Community Endorsement We support and agree to pursue implementation of this plan and agree to seek the necessary resources to improve and protect the water quality of the Black River. Amherst Township, Lorain County LaGrange Township, Lorain County Brighton Township, Lorain County Litchfield Township, Medina County Camden Township, Lorain County Liverpool Township, Medina County Carlisle Township, Lorain County New London Township, Huron County Chatham Township, Medina County New Russia Township, Lorain County City of Avon, Lorain County Olmsted Township, Cuyahoga
    [Show full text]
  • A User's Guide
    AA UUsseerr’’ss GGuuiiddee 1 The West Branch Watershed Of the two main branches of the Black River, the West Branch, at slightly more than 175 square miles, is not quite as large or as developed as the East Branch. The West Branch remains a predominantly rural watershed and is an important natural resource for the region, but the watershed does suffer environmental degradation, much of it coming from its agricultural land uses. The West Branch Watershed The West Branch watershed is your watershed; please help enhance and protect it. The Black River Watershed Coordinator and the Black River Remedial Action Plan Coordinating Committee developed this handbook in an effort to help you learn about the West Branch and its geology, history, wildlife and beauty. We hope this handbook will 2 help you better understand the watershed, become proud of its natural beauty and become excited about protecting it. At the end of this handbook, you will find ideas on how you, your neighbors and your community can help protect this valuable natural resource. "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It’s not." Theodor Geisel (Dr. Seuss) "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It's not." West Branch Facts Theodor Geisel (Dr. Seuss) The West Branch watershed encompasses all or part of 16 townships in 4 counties. Watershed Size 175.4 square miles Streams 347 miles Average Stream Gradient 9.9 feet per mile Drainage Density 1.98 stream mile per square mile Roads 425 miles Railroad Lines 60 miles Average Imperviousness of the land 2.35% Precipitation 35 inches (rain) 42 inches (snow) A stream or river flows from one place to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Berea Sandstone Outcrops in the Black River Valley
    Field Guide to Berea Sandstone Outcrops in the Black River Valley at Elyria, Ohio: Slumps, Slides, Mud Diapirs, and Associated Fracturing in Mississippian Delta Deposits1 NEIL A. WELLS, ALAN H. COOGAN, AND JUDY J. MAJORAS, Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 ABSTRACT. Synsedimentary slumps of Berea Sandstone and diapirs of Cleveland and Bedford Shales are seen in complex delta-front facies at Elyria, Lorain County, OH. Analysis of orientations of fractures, bedding, and crossbeds helps interpret the history of deformation. In many instances, initial conjugate shears formed with least stress parallel to paleoflow, down the paleoslope. Some conjugate joints subsequently become normal and strike-slip faults. Some blocks of Berea show tilting and/or sliding to the extent of creating recumbent overturned drag folds in subjacent shales. Deformation of slide bases varies from brittle to plastic (fluidized). These features support the view that irregular thicknesses of Berea Sandstone are the result of deformation and are not fillings of deep valleys eroded in a "Red Bedford" delta. We suggest that the Berea represents rapid progradation of sands over formerly deep-water shales following rebound at the end of foreland-basin subsidence. OHIO J. SCI. 91 (1): 35-48, 1991 INTRODUCTION This trip assesses syndepositional deformation in the Berea Sandstone at 12 stops along the Black River in Elyria, OH (Figs. 1, 2). Using informal names, the Elyria section comprises Berea Sandstone, over red "Red Bedford" Shale, over grey Bedford Shale (with siltstones), over Cleveland Shale (Fig. 3). Their ages are slightly uncertain. The Devonian/ Mississippian boundary has been placed at the base of the Bedford (Pepper et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Black River Watershed Action Plan December 30, 2011
    Black River Watershed Action Plan December 30, 2011 Written By: Christina Znidarsic Former Black River Watershed Coordinator Lorain County Community Development Department (Sections I through- IV) And Coldwater Consulting, LLC With input from Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. and the Lorain County Community Development Department (Sections V through IX) With technical assistance from: Christopher Alvarado, CCPC Marty Rowe, Lorain County Auditor’s Office Jim Boddy, LCGHD Nancy Funni, Lorain SWCD Ryan Kemper, NRCS Karl Schneider, NRCS Tom Holmes, ODNR Matt Adkins, ODNR OCM Brian George, ODNR OCM Steve Lewis, ODNR OCM Ted Conlin, Ohio EPA Bill Zawiski, Ohio EPA Liz Mather, WRLC Special Thanks to: Joe Reitz, Avon Lake Engineering Dept. Mike McNutt, Columbus Board of Health Betty Blair, Lorain County Commissioner Col. Matthew Nahorn, New Indian Ridge Museum Cheryl Wolfe, Oberlin College Greg Nageotte, ODNR Rosa Garcia-Gee, Sheffield Lake SUAB 1 Black River Watershed Action Plan Community Endorsement We support and agree to pursue implementation of this plan and agree to seek the necessary resources to improve and protect the water quality of the Black River. Amherst Township, Lorain County LaGrange Township, Lorain County Brighton Township, Lorain County Litchfield Township, Medina County Camden Township, Lorain County Liverpool Township, Medina County Carlisle Township, Lorain County New London Township, Huron County Chatham Township, Medina County New Russia Township, Lorain County City of Avon, Lorain County Olmsted Township, Cuyahoga
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Black River Basin, 2012 Ashland, Cuyahoga, Huron, Lorain, and Medina Counties, Ohio
    Biological and Water Quality Study of the Black River Basin, 2012 Ashland, Cuyahoga, Huron, Lorain, and Medina Counties, Ohio Black River at Elyria at Cascade Park (RM 14.95) Division of Surface Water Ecological Assessment Section October 2016 DSW/EAS 2016-08-05 Black River Basin 2012 October 26, 2016 Biological and Water Quality Study of the Black River Basin, 2012. Ashland, Cuyahoga, Huron, Lorain, and Medina Counties, Ohio Ohio EPA Technical Report DSW/EAS 2016-08-05 October 26, 2016 Prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Ecological Assessment Section 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 Division of Surface Water Northeast District Office 2110 East Aurora Road Twinsburg, OH 44087 John R. Kasich, Governor Craig W. Butler, Director State of Ohio Ohio Environmental Protection Agency DSW/EAS 2016-08-05 Black River Basin 2012 October 26, 2016 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 1 BENEFICIAL USE RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................... 13 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 16 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lorain City's Earliest History;
    LORAIN CITY'S EARLIEST HISTORY; A NEW LOOK AT THE OLD MYTHS, AND THE TRUTH. T. Derby 2015 [ The prior local-histories seem to have relied upon an abundance of “hearsay” and supposition ( and inevitably worsened by each subsequent rendition). This version is an attempt to finally put the honors where they truly belong --- with the hope that the citizens of the future, will care enough to do likewise. ] PLEASE DO NOT PRINT TO 'HARD-COPY'. ( the maps will no longer be “zoom-able”/ readable ) -- MYTH: In 1787, the Moravians built a village “at the mouth of the Black River” -- Many Lorain city-historians have attributed a direct connection to the city's history, and the '1787' Moravian-Indian settlement, which was very briefly located within the area of present-day Lorain County. However, that '1787' site was definitely never at the “mouth of the river” –- and was probably not even within the boundaries of the later City of Lorain. In the year 1787, the Moravian missionary, Rev. David Zeisberger, led a group of Christian- converted Native-American “Indians” from their village on the Cuyahoga River, to an intended new settlement in this area. But after only twelve days of establishing a crude village near this river, they were prevented from settling here ( due to the insistence of a Native-American tribe who believed that this area would be too dangerous for the Christian “Indians”). Rev. Zeisberger kept a daily account of his experiences here, and although he did not specifically record the name of this river ( which he only describes as "half way between" the Cuyahoga River and the Huron River), but he mentioned another very important detail.
    [Show full text]