DOCSLIB.ORG

Noxious Weed Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Noxious Weed Program SEA TON SUBDIVISION GOMBIN£0 PR£LIMINARY PLAN & FINAL PLAT APPLICATION EXHIBIT D WILDLIFE CHECKLIST, VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN & CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDY Garfield Countv IT Department GIS Resources: Colorado Division of Wildlife WR/S Data Checklist for: Rob Hykys, GIS Analyst, [email protected] 97()..945-1377 x1590, FAX; 970-384-3670 511012005 3:46:28 PM Note: For additional information and interpretation of this data, contact Pam Schnurr, Wildlife Biologist, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Grand Junction, at 970-297-1192. Species & Habitat Type: Bald Eagle Active Nest Site Bald Eagle Communal Roost Bald Eagle Roost Site Bald Eagle Winter Range Bald Eagle Winter Concentration Area Bald Eagle Winter Foraging Area Black Bear Overall Range Black Bear Fall Concentration Area Black Bear Summer Concentration Area Black Bear-Human Conflict Brazilian Free-Tailed Bat Overall Range Bighorn Overall Range Big hom Winter Range Bigham Winter Concentration Area Bigham Summer Range Bighorn Production Area Canada Goose Brood Concentration Area Canada Goose Feeding Area Canada Goose Production Area Canada Goose Winter Range Canada Goose Winter Concentration Area Elk Winter Range Elk Winter Concentration Area Elk Severe Winter Range Elk Overall Range Elk Summer Range Elk Summer Concentration Area Elk Production Area Elk Highway Crossing Elk Limcred Use Area Great Blue Heron Nesting Area Great Blue Heron Foraging Area Lynx Overall Range Lynx Potential Habitat Mule Deer Winter Range Mule Deer Winter Concentration Area Mule Deer Severe Winter Range Mule Deer Overall Range Mule Deer Summer Range Mule Deer Resident Population Mule Deer Highway Crossing Osprey Active Nest Site This property lies: Species & Habitat Type: Entirely Partially Within Out In Area In Area 1 Mile of Area Osprey Foraging Area / Peregrine Falcon Nesting Area ./ Peregrine Falcon Potential Nesting Area ..L Pronghorn Antelope Overall Range ./ Pronghorn Antelope Winter Range ..:L Pronghorn Antelope Winter Concentration Area ..L.. Razorback Sucker ./ River Otter Overall Range ./ Sage Grouse Brood Area ./ Sage Grouse Overall Range ..L Sage Grouse Production Area ./ Sage Grouse Winter Range ./ Sage Grouse Historic Habitat .L Wild Turkey Overall Range ./ Wild Turkey Production Area ./ Wild Turkey Winter Range ..:L Wild Turkey Winter Concentration Area ./ Wild Turkey Roosting Sites v Seaton Subdivision Vegetation and Wildlife Assessment November 2009 e.m. ecological, LLC Natural Resource and Restoration Consulting Seaton SubdivisiOn Vegetation and Wildlife November 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose ............................................................................................................................................2 Brief Description of the Property .........................................................................................................2 Soils and Table 1- Soil Types on the Proposed Seaton Subdivided Property .............................................2 Vegetation Resources and Noxious Weeds ..........................................................................................3 Distinct Plant Communities ......................................................................................................3 Narrowleaf Cottonwood-Willow Riparian Plant Community ..........................................................3 Gam bel Oak-Serviceberry Mountain Shrubland ..........................................................................4 Open Meadows .......................................................................................................................4 Noxious Weeds Present on the Seaton Proposed Subdivision ................................................................4 Garfield County Weed List. ......................................................................................................4 State of Colorado Weed List..................................................................................................... 5 Extent of Garfield County Listed Weeds-Overview ......................................................................5 Extent of State of Colorado Listed Weeds-Overview ....................................................................5 Integrated Weed Management .............................................................................................................5 Garfield County Listed Noxious Weeds: Species Accounts and Management ..........................................6 1. Canada Thistle ( Cirsium arvense, syn, Brea arvense) ...............................................................6 2. Common Burdock (Arctium minus) .......................................................................................8 3. Houndstongue ( Cynoglossum officina/e)..............................................•.................................... 9 4. Oxeye Daisy (Chrysanthemum /eucanthemum) .. ......................................................................10 State of Colorado Listed Noxious Weeds: Brief Species Accounts and Some Management ..................... 11 5. Absinth Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium), List B ................................................................12 6. Bull Thistle (Cirsium vulgare), List B ....................................................................................15 7. Common Mullein (Verbascum thapsis) List C ........................................................................16 8. Common Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) List B ..........................................................................17 9. Cheatgrass or Downy brome (Bromus tectorum, Syn. Anisantha tectorum), List C .................... 19 10. Poison Hemlock (Conium maculatum), List C ......................................................................21 Crownvetch (Securigera varia, syn. Coronilla varia) .............................................................................22 General Comments for all weeds on the property and a seed mix recommendation .................................23 IWM Treatment Methods and the limitations of this document. ..............................................................24 Wildlife ...........................................................................................................................................25 Mountain Lions .....................................................................................................................25 American Elk ........................................................................................................................25 Mule Deer .............................................................................................................................25 Black Bears ..........................................................................................................................26 Beaver .................................................................................................................................26 Fences and Dogs .............................................................................................................................26 Literature Referenced-Seaton Proposed Subdivision, Vegetation and Wildlife .........................................27 Appenidix 1. Garfield County Noxious Weed List 2009 .........................................................................29 Appendix 2. Colorado Noxious Weed List 2009 ...................................................................................30 Map 1. Seaton Proposed Subdivision, Weed Areas of Note Map 2. Soil Map for Seaton Proposed Subdivision Map 3. Mountain Lion Human Conflict Area and Overall Range for Mountain Lions Map 4. Overall Summer Range and Calving Areas for American Elk Map 5. Winter Range and Winter Concentration Areas for American Elk Map 6. Mule Deer Summer Range Map 7. Mule Deer Winter Range, Winter Concentration Areas and Severe Winter Range em ecological, LLC P.O. Box 1990, Carbondale, Colorado 81623 1 Seaton Subdivision Vegetation and Wildlife November 2009 Purpose This document provides information and guidance regarding pertinent vegetation resources and wildlife on the portion of the Seaton Property proposed for a property split or subdivision. The Seaton property is located along Four Mile Road (CR117) roughly three and a quarter miles south of Glenwood Springs and up the Four Mile Creek watershed. This property lies just south of Chelyn Road off of Four Mile Road and includes a section of Four Mile Creek approximately two plus river miles upstream from the confluence of Four Mile Creek and the Roaring Fork River. The elevation is roughly 6,320 feet at the east edge of the Seaton property along Four Mile Creek Road dropping down slightly to the creek bottom to the west. This area extending from the road to the creek consists of the eastern half of the existing Seaton property and is now proposed as a separate lot (See Map 1, Seaton Proposed Subdivision, Weed areas of Note) . Brief Description of the Property The 4.448 acre piece of the Seaton property that is being proposed as a separate parcel is comprised mainly of a riparian plant community, an adjacent remnant of the original native upland Gambel oak/serviceberry community, and cleared meadow areas up on a higher terrace, now consisting of cultivated Eurasian pasture grasses. The other half of the property, 8.6 acres with the existing house, comprises the western half. It consists mainly of an un­ manipulated native, upland, mixed-mountain shrub plant community extending uphill above the existing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chrysanthemoides Monilifera Ssp
    MANAGEMENT OF BONESEED (CHRYSANTHEMOIDES MONILIFERA SSP. MONILIFERA) (L.) T. NORL. USING FIRE, HERBICIDES AND OTHER TECHNIQUES IN AUSTRALIAN WOODLANDS Rachel L. Melland Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Agriculture, Food and Wine University of Adelaide August 2007 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... II ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ VI DECLARATION ................................................................................................................ VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. IX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 AIMS OF THIS THESIS .......................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... 5 2.1 PROCESSES OF NATIVE ECOSYSTEM DEGRADATION ............................................................ 5 2.2 GLOBAL PLANT INVASIONS – ECOSYSTEM DEGRADING PROCESSES .................................... 6 2.3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL WEED PROBLEM IN AUSTRALIA ..................................................... 10 2.4 CAUSES AND PROCESSES OF INVASIVENESS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Milk Thistle
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control BIOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF EXOTIC T RU E T HISTL E S RACHEL WINSTON , RICH HANSEN , MA R K SCH W A R ZLÄNDE R , ER IC COO M BS , CA R OL BELL RANDALL , AND RODNEY LY M FHTET-2007-05 U.S. Department Forest September 2008 of Agriculture Service FHTET he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in 1995 Tby the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ On the cover: Italian thistle. Photo: ©Saint Mary’s College of California. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for information only and does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuevas Evidencias Históricas Del Siglo XVIII Sobre La Presencia De “Cardos” En Argentina Y Sus Implicancias Etnobotánicas
    Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 55 (2) 2020 D. G. Gutiérrez et al. - “Cardos” en Argentina en el siglo XVIII y etnobotánica NUEVAS EVIDENCIAS HISTÓRICAS DEL SIGLO XVIII SOBRE LA PRESENCIA DE “CARDOS” EN ARGENTINA Y SUS IMPLICANCIAS ETNOBOTÁNICAS NEW HISTORICAL EVIDENCES OF THE 18TH CENTURY ON PRESENCE OF “THISTLES” IN ARGENTINA AND ITS ETHNOBOTANICAL IMPLICATIONS Diego G. Gutiérrez1,2 , Gustavo F. Scarpa1 y Cintia N. Rosso1 SUMMARY 1. División Plantas Vasculares, Background and aims: Currently, many species called “thistles” are widely distributed Museo Argentino de Ciencias in Argentina. During 18th Century several Jesuit publications mentioned “thistles” as Naturales, Consejo Nacional the work made by Florian Paucke. The goal of this work is to gather, from writing de Investigaciones Científicas y sources of the 18th Century, plant records called as “thistles” or similar names; Técnicas, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470, to identify at species level the plant entities mentioned by Paucke as “azafrán”, C1405DJR, ciudad de Buenos Aires, “cardo”, and “cardo hortense”; and to discuss ethnobotanical implications. Argentina. M&M: The study area included Argentina from the Pampean region to the Chacoan 2. Laboratorio de Morfología region. Historical evidences of the 18th Century, herbarium materials and their Comparada de Espermatófitas, morphology were analyzed, and field trips were made. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Results: Entities “azafrán alazor”, “de Indias” o “paracuario” by Paucke were Forestales, Universidad Nacional identified asCarthamus tinctorius (“safflower”), and “cardo” and “cardo hortense” as de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Cynara cardunculus (Compositae), associated with varieties sylvestris (“thistle”) and Argentina. scolymus (“artichoke”), respectively. “Cardo santo” named by Pedro de Montenegro was associated to Argemone subfusiformis (Papaveraceae).
    [Show full text]
  • Land Cover Types and Associated Native Species
    CHAPTER 7.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: LAND COVER TYPES AND ASSOCIATED NATIVE SPECIES This chapter analyzes anticipated changes to land cover types within the HCP Permit Area as a framework for analyzing changes in species habitat that could affect the fish, wildlife, and plant species that use those habitats for breeding, foraging, or sheltering behaviors during their life history. The land cover types defined in the HCP Permit Area include natural vegetation communities as well as non-natural land covers (resulting from past and ongoing anthropogenic uses). This chapter also describes potential affects to common native species within the HCP Permit Area. Plant and wildlife species considered to be “special-status,” including the HCP Covered Species, are analyzed in Chapter 8, Biological Resources: Wildlife. Public and agency comments received during early public scoping (CPUC 2009, 2010) were also considered and incorporated by reference into this analysis (see Sections 1.3, Public and Agency Involvement, and 1.4, Relationship of EA to Other Environmental Documents) included concerns regarding impacts on w etlands, riparian habitat, and other sensitive vegetation communities. 7.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT This chapter describes the land covers in the HCP Permit Area, changes to land covers as a result of the proposed action, and potential effects to common native species as a result of those changes. This chapter also identifies invasive and noxious weeds occurring within the HCP Permit Area. Common native species analyzed in this National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document were determined through a review of available biological technical reports prepared by Southern California Edison (SCE) for the Cross Valley Loop Project EIR (CPUC 2009, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308 Updated Study Report (Final Technical Report)
    Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P-308 Updated Study Report (Final Technical Report) Terrestrial December 2013 Prepared by: PacifiCorp Energy Hydro Resources 825 NE Multnomah, Suite 1500 Portland, OR 97232 For Public Review TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 SPECIAL STATUS PLANT STUDY ................................................................................ 2 3.1 Objectives & Description ............................................................................................................. 2 3.2 Background Information .............................................................................................................. 3 3.3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3.3.1 Pre-field Review .................................................................................................................... 3 3.3.2 Field Surveys ......................................................................................................................... 9 3.4 Results .......................................................................................................................................... 9 3.5 Discussion & Conclusions .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnobotanical Analysis on Wild Edible Plants of the Turkish Asteraceae Taxa
    ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER | 17 An Ethnobotanical Analysis on Wild Edible Plants of the Turkish Asteraceae Taxa İsmail ŞENKARDEŞ (✉) Gizem BULUT Ahmet DOĞAN Ertan TUZLACI Summary Asteraceae (Compositae) is one of the biggest families in the Flora of Turkey as in the World. Also, it is one of the most important families in which many popular plants are used as food and recreational tea in Turkey. The aim of this study is to make an ethnobotanical analysis on the wild edible plants of the Asteraceae family in Turkey, according to our investigations and scientific literature records. This study is based on local ethnobotanical investigations. The information about the plants was obtained from the local people through open and semi-structured interviews. In the light of our investigations and the literature records, 43 genera (including 121 taxa) of Asteraceae (used for food, tea and other purposes) were determined. Among them, Scorzonera, Tragopogon, Cirsium, Centaurea, Onopordum, Taraxacum, Echinops, Achillea, Anthemis and Carduus are the most popular genera in the localities of Turkey. Key words Asteraceae; ethnobotany; wild edible plants Turkey Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey ✉ Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: May 18, 2018 | Accepted: November 22, 2019 aCS Agric. conspec. sci. Vol. 84 (2019) No. 1 (17-28) 18 | İsmail ŞENKARDEŞ, Gizem BULUT, Ahmet DOĞAN, Ertan TUZLACI Introduction (Tuzlacı, 2011b). Further, 43 scientific investigations conducted from year 1994 to 2017, were reviewed (as referred above). Wild plants are an important component of people’s daily life around the World, because of their widespread use and cultural Scientific names of the plants were given according to Davis importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Diversity and Conservation
    ISSN 1308-5301 Print ISSN 1308-8084 Online Biological Diversity and Conservation CİLT / VOLUME 11 SAYI / NUMBER 2 AĞUSTOS / AUGUST 2018 Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma Üzerine Yayın Yapan Hakemli Uluslararası Bir Dergidir An International Journal is About Biological Diversity and Conservation With Refree BioDiCon Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma Biological Diversity and Conservation Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma Üzerine Yayın Yapan Hakemli Uluslararası Bir Dergidir An International Journal is About Biological Diversity and Conservation With Refree Cilt / Volume 11, Sayı / Number 2, Ağustos / August 2018 (ONUNCU YIL/TENTH YEAR) Editör / Editor-in-Chief: Ersin YÜCEL ISSN 1308-5301 Print; ISSN 1308-8084 Online Açıklama “Biological Diversity and Conservation”, biyolojik çeşitlilik, koruma, biyoteknoloji, çevre düzenleme, tehlike altındaki türler, tehlike altındaki habitatlar, sistematik, vejetasyon, ekoloji, biyocoğrafya, genetik, bitkiler, hayvanlar ve mikroorganizmalar arasındaki ilişkileri konu alan orijinal makaleleri yayınlar. Tanımlayıcı yada deneysel ve sonuçları net olarak belirlenmiş deneysel çalışmalar kabul edilir. Makale yazım dili Türkçe veya İngilizce’dir. Yayınlanmak üzere gönderilen yazı orijinal, daha önce hiçbir yerde yayınlanmamış olmalı veya işlem görüyor olmamalıdır. Yayınlanma yeri Türkiye’dir. Bu dergi yılda üç sayı yayınlanır. Description “Biological Diversity and Conservation” publishes original articles on biological diversity, conservation, biotechnology, environmental management, threatened of species, threatened
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Australia's Weed Management System
    Mapping Australia’s Weed Management System MARCH 2013 RIRDC Publication No. 13/019 Mapping Australia’s Weed Management System by G. Cattanach, A. Harris and J. Horne March 2013 RIRDC Publication No. 13/019 RIRDC Project No. PRJ-006923 © 2013 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-74254-512-7 ISSN 1440-6845 Mapping Australia’s Weed Management System Publication No. 13/019 Project No. PRJ-006923 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Klamath NF Noxious Weed and Non-Native Invasive Plant List
    Klamath National Forest Noxious Weed and Non-native Invasive Plant list Scientific Name (Jepson, Plant KNF CDFA Cal-IPC 2012) Code Common Name(s) Priority Rating Rating Family Acroptilon repens (L.) DC. ACRE3 Russian knapweed High B Moderate Asteraceae Ailanthus altissima AIAL Tree of Heaven Mod. C Moderate Simaroubaceae Bromus tectorum L. BRTE Cheat Grass Low None High Poaceae Buddleja davidii Franchet BUDA2 Butterfly bush Mod. None None Buddlejaceae Heart-podded hoary Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. CADR cress Whitetop Mod. B Moderate Brassicaceae Cardaria chalapensis (L.) CACH Lens-podded Moderate Hand.-Maz 10 Whitetop Mod. B ♦ Brassicaceae Cardaria pubescens (C.A. Mey) Jarmol. CAPU6 Hairy whitetop High B Limited Brassicaceae Carduus acanthoides L. subsp. acanthoides CAAC Plumeless thistle High A Limited Asteraceae Carduus nutans L. CANU4 Musk thistle High A Moderate Asteraceae Carduus pycnocephalus L. subsp. pycnocephalus CAPY2 Italian thistle High C Moderate Asteraceae Diffuse knapweed, Centaurea diffusa Lam. CEDI3 white knapweed High A Moderate Asteraceae CEMA4 Centaurea maculosa Lam. CESTM Spotted knapweed High A High Asteraceae Centaurea melitensis L. CEME2 Malta starthistle High None Moderate Asteraceae CEPR2 Moderate Centaurea pratensis Thuill. CENI3 Meadow knapweed High A ♦ Asteraceae Centaurea solstitialis L. CESO3 Yellow starthistle Mod. C High Asteraceae Centaurea squarrosa CESQ Squarrose Willd. CEVIS2 knapweed High A Moderate Asteraceae Rush skeleton Chondrilla juncea L. CHJU weed, hogbite High A Moderate Asteraceae Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. CIAR4 Canada thistle Mod. B Moderate Asteraceae Cirsium vulgare CIVU Bull thistle Low C Moderate Asteraceae Conium maculatum L. COMA2 Poison hemlock Low None Moderate Apiaceae Cynoglossum officinale L. CYOF Houndstongue High None Moderate Boraginaceae Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link.
    [Show full text]
  • Flower Heads of Onopordum Tauricum Willd. and Carduus Acanthoides L – Source of Prebiotics and Antioxidants
    Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2016. 28(10): 732-736 doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2016-05-544 http://www.ejfa.me/ SHORT COMMUNICATION Flower heads of Onopordum tauricum Willd. and Carduus acanthoides L – source of prebiotics and antioxidants Nadezhda Petkova1, Dasha Mihaylova2* 1Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 2Department of Biotechnology, University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., Plovdiv, Bulgaria ABSTRACT The carbohydrate composition (inulin and sugars) and antioxidant potential of 95% ethanol and subsequent water extracts from flower heads of Carduus acanthoides L. and Onopordum tauricum Willd. grown in Bulgaria were investigated. The total fructans content in both thistle species was analyzed by ketose-specific assay, while individual inulin and sugars content was defined by HPLC-RID method. The total phenolic content and the antioxidant capacity of the studied extracts were also examined as the antioxidant potential was determined by four in vitro assays (DPPH, ABTS, FRAP and CUPRAC). O. tauricum Willd. flower heads were evaluated for the first time as a rich source of prebiotics and total phenols. Higher fructans content was found in the water extracts, while the ethanol extracts possessed better antioxidant activity. Keywords: Antioxidants; Extracts; Inulin; Fructooligosacharides; Thistles INTRODUCTION et al. (2011) reported the antioxidant activity of ethanol extracts. Onopordum tauricum Willd. and Carduus acanthoides L. are thistles that belong to the Asteraceae family. The representatives of genus Onopordum are native to Carduus acanthoides L. is a plant from Carduus genus. In Europe (Kleonikos, 2006). In Bulgaria this species are the Bulgarian flora the genus Carduus is presented by commonly spread at dry stony ruderal places and the 14 species, 5 of which are endemic (Stojanov et al., isolated metabolites from the species of the genus include 1967; Tutin et al., 1976; Delipavlov & Cheshmedzhiev, saponins, alkaloids, sesquiterpen lactones, flavonoids, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Planting Density in Two Thistle Species Used for Vegetable Rennet Production in Marginal Mediterranean Areas
    Article Effect of Planting Density in Two Thistle Species Used for Vegetable Rennet Production in Marginal Mediterranean Areas Stefano Zenobi 1, Marco Fiorentini 1, Lucia Aquilanti 1, Roberta Foligni 1, Cinzia Mannozzi 1, Massimo Mozzon 1, Silvia Zitti 1, Simona Casavecchia 1, Bouthaina Al Mohandes Dridi 2 and Roberto Orsini 1,* 1 Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences (D3A), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; [email protected] (S.Z.); [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (L.A.); [email protected] (R.F.); [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (S.Z.); [email protected] (S.C.) 2 High Agronomic Institute, IRESA-University of Sousse, 4042 Chatt-Mariem, Tunisia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-071-220-4157 Abstract: In Mediterranean cropping systems, it is important to utilize marginal lands for the cultivation of non-food crops. Spontaneous thistle genera such as Cynara cardunculus L. and Onopordum tauricum Willd. are native to southern Europe. Previous research has focused on their spontaneous growth in the environment or ability to supply biofuel. The aim of this study was to identify the effect of two different planting densities on the flower differentiation, vegetable rennet production and weed control of O. tauricum Willd. and C. cardunculus L. in rainfed unfertilized Mediterranean cropping systems. The results showed that plant density influenced most of the Citation: Zenobi, S.; Fiorentini, M.; biomass parameters for O. tauricum Willd.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Treating Mormon Pioneer Gardens As Cultural Landscapes
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2011 The Solitary Place Shall Be Glad for Them: Understanding and Treating Mormon Pioneer Gardens as Cultural Landscapes Emily Anne Brooksby Wheeler Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Cultural Resource Management and Policy Analysis Commons, History of Religion Commons, and the Landscape Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Wheeler, Emily Anne Brooksby, "The Solitary Place Shall Be Glad for Them: Understanding and Treating Mormon Pioneer Gardens as Cultural Landscapes" (2011). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 899. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/899 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SOLITARY PLACE SHALL BE GLAD FOR THEM: UNDERSTANDING AND TREATING MORMON PIONEER GARDENS AS CULTURAL LANDSCAPES by Emily Anne Brooksby Wheeler A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Approved: _____________________ _____________________ Michael L. Timmons Dr. David R. Lewis Major Professor Committee Member _____________________ _____________________ William A. Varga Byron R. Burnham Committee Member Dean of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan,
    [Show full text]