100 North Crescent Drive Beverly Hills Media Center Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

100 North Crescent Drive Beverly Hills Media Center Project 100 North Crescent Drive Beverly Hills Media Center Project Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH#2017051012 prepared for City of Beverly Hills Community Development Department 455 North Rexford Drive, First Floor Beverly Hills, California 90210 prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 301 Los Angeles, California 90012 November 2017 100 North Crescent Drive Beverly Hills Media Center Project Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH#2017051012 prepared for City of Beverly Hills Community Development Department 455 North Rexford Drive, First Floor Beverly Hills, California 90210 prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. 250 East 1st Street, Suite 301 Los Angeles, California 90012 November 2017 This report prepared on 50% recycled paper with 50% post-consumer content. Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 23 2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 35 2.1 Project Applicant .............................................................................................................. 35 2.2 Lead Agency Contact Person ............................................................................................ 35 2.3 Project Location ............................................................................................................... 35 2.4 Existing Site Characteristics ............................................................................................. 38 2.4.1 Current Land Use Designation and Zoning ...................................................... 38 2.4.2 Surrounding Land Uses .................................................................................... 38 2.5 Project Characteristics ..................................................................................................... 38 2.5.1 Proposed Site Plan ........................................................................................... 39 2.5.2 Parking and Site Access ................................................................................... 56 2.5.3 Utilities ............................................................................................................. 56 2.5.4 Construction and Grading ................................................................................ 57 2.5.5 Green Building Features .................................................................................. 60 2.5.6 Applicant-Proposed Project Design Features .................................................. 60 2.6 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................ 60 2.7 Required Approvals .......................................................................................................... 61 3 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................. 63 4 Environmental Impact Analysis ................................................................................................... 67 4.1 Aesthetics ......................................................................................................................... 69 4.1.1 Setting .............................................................................................................. 69 4.1.2 Impact Analysis ................................................................................................ 79 4.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................ 93 4.2.1 Setting .............................................................................................................. 93 4.2.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................. 100 4.3 Cultural Resources ......................................................................................................... 109 4.3.1 Setting ............................................................................................................ 109 4.3.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................. 121 4.4 Land Use and Planning ................................................................................................... 131 4.4.1 Setting ............................................................................................................ 131 4.4.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................. 133 4.5 Noise .............................................................................................................................. 149 4.5.1 Setting ............................................................................................................ 149 4.5.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................. 155 4.6 Transportation and Traffic ............................................................................................. 169 4.6.1 Setting ............................................................................................................ 169 4.6.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................. 176 Draft Environmental Impact Report i City of Beverly Hills 100 North Crescent Drive Beverly Hills Media Center Project 4.7 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................... 201 4.7.1 Setting ............................................................................................................ 201 4.7.2 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................. 203 5 Other CEQA Required Discussions ............................................................................................. 207 5.1 Growth Inducement ....................................................................................................... 207 5.1.1 Population Growth ........................................................................................ 207 5.1.2 Economic Growth .......................................................................................... 207 5.1.3 Removal of Obstacles to Growth ................................................................... 208 5.2 Irreversible Environmental Effects ................................................................................. 208 5.3 Energy Effects ................................................................................................................. 209 6 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................ 213 7 References ................................................................................................................................. 245 7.1 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 245 7.2 List of Preparers ............................................................................................................. 246 7.3 Organizations and Persons Consulted ........................................................................... 247 Tables Table 1 Project Summary .................................................................................................................2 Table 2 Summary of Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Residual Impacts ........ 10 Table 3 NOP Comments and EIR Response .................................................................................. 24 Table 4 Issues Not Studied in the EIR ........................................................................................... 28 Table 5 Project Summary .............................................................................................................. 39 Table 6 Cumulative Projects List ................................................................................................... 64 Table 7 Ambient Air Quality Data ................................................................................................. 94 Table 8 Current Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards .............................................. 95 Table 9 SCAQMD LSTs for Emissions in SRA-2 ............................................................................ 102 Table 10 Estimated Project Employment ..................................................................................... 102 Table 11 Estimated Construction Phase Emissions ...................................................................... 104 Table 12 Estimated Operational Emissions .................................................................................. 105 Table 13 Existing Land Uses and Zoning ....................................................................................... 132 Table 14 Project Consistency with General Plan Policies ............................................................. 133 Table 15 Sound Level Measurement Results ...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Travel Summary
    Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
    [Show full text]
  • ATA MEMBERSHIP LIST As of August 9, 2021
    ATA MEMBERSHIP LIST As of August 9, 2021 A3 ARTISTS AGENCY (CA) APERTURE TALENT (NY) BBA TALENT, Inc. 750 North San Vincente Blvd., 300 Park Avenue South, Suite 201 3500 W. Olive Ave., Suite 300 East Tower 11th Floor New York, NY 10010 Burbank, CA 91505 Los Angeles, CA 90069 (212) 271-1634 (818) 506-8188 (310) 859-0625 AQUA TALENT BECSEY WISDOM KALAJIAN A3 ARTISTS AGENCY (NY) 9000 Sunset Blvd., #700 10585 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 140 350 Fifth Avenue, 38th Floor West Hollywood, CA 90069 Los Angeles, CA 90025 New York, NY 10118 (310) 859-8889 (310) 402-5152 (646) 486-4600 ARCIERI & ASSOCIATES BETH STEIN & ASSOCIATES th AKA TALENT AGENCY 6 East 39 Street, Suite 1202 925 North La Brea, 4th Floor 4525 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 280 New York, NY 10016 Los Angeles, CA 90038 Los Angeles, CA 90010 (212) 286-1700 (310) 452-8811 (323) 965-5600 ARTISTIC TALENT, INC. BEVERLY HECHT AGENCY 12100 ALMOND TALENT AGENCY 5437 Laurel Canyon, Suite 111 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 800 8217 Beverly Blvd., #8 Valley Village, CA 91607 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Los Angeles, CA 90048 (323) 206-7807 (818) 559-5600 (323) 934-5500 ARTISTS & REPRESENTATIVES BIENSTOCK INC. ALVARADO REY AGENCY (CA) 888 7th Avenue, Suite 913 7080 Hollywood Blvd. #1100 6100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1500 New York, NY 10106 Los Angeles, CA 90028 Los Angeles, CA 90048 (212) 765-3040 (323) 656-2277 (323) 655-1313 BIG MOUTH TALENT INC. AMERICAN ARTISTS GROUP TALENT ARTISTS & REPRESENTATIVES 5100 Ravenswood Ave. Suite 102 AGENCY LLC (NY) Chicago, IL 60640 13321 Ventura Boulevard, Suite C-2 630 Ninth Avenue, Suite 220 (312) 421-4400 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 New York, NY 10036 (818) 430-8688 (212) 505-1400 BMG TALENT GROUP (LA) 5455 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900 AMSEL, EISENSTADT, FRAZIER & ARTISTS UNITED TALENT AGENCY Los Angeles, CA 90036 HINOJOSA, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Target Department Store EIR Executive Summary
    8555 Santa Monica Boulevard Mixed-Use Project EIR Section 3.0 Environmental Setting 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This section provides a general overview of the environmental setting for the project. More detailed descriptions of the environmental setting for each environmental issue area can be found in Section 4.0, Environmental Impact Analysis. 3.1 REGIONAL SETTING The project site is located in the City of West Hollywood (City), in western Los Angeles County (refer to figures 2-1, Regional Location, and 2-2, Project Location, in Section 2.0, Project Description). Incorporated in 1984, West Hollywood encompasses approximately 1.9 square miles immediately east of Beverly Hills and west of the community of Hollywood (City of Los Angeles). The City is in a highly urbanized area of the greater Los Angeles region and is almost entirely developed. The estimated 2016 population of the City is 35,923 persons. The City’s current housing stock consists of an estimated 25,127 units. The average household size in the City is about 1.56 persons per unit (California Department of Finance, 2016). A series of east-west and north-south arterial roadways provide vehicular access to the City. Major east-west thoroughfares include Sunset Boulevard, Santa Monica Boulevard, and Fountain Avenue. Major north-south thoroughfares include Doheny Drive, La Cienega Boulevard, Fairfax Avenue, and La Brea Avenue. West Hollywood is characterized by a dense, compact urban form with small lots, a mix of land uses, and a walkable street grid. According to Walk Score, a website that ranks cities based on walkability, West Hollywood is the most walkable city in California with a Walk Score of 91 (Walk Score website, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Beverly Hills Living in the City
    city • Measure E’s donations have come briefs • Board wrestles over send- rudy cole • Just What from financially invested firms Page 3 ing lawyers to city meetings Page 5 You Wanted, More Hilton Page 6 ALSO ON THE WEB Beverly Hills www.bhweekly.com Living In The City WeeklySERVING BEVERLY HILLS • BEVERLYWOOD • LOS ANGELES Issue 471 • October 9 - October 15, 2008 HowHow willwill BeverlyBeverly HillsHills bebe impactedimpacted byby thethe unsteadyunsteady economy?economy? OUR 9th Anniversary cover story • page 9 KBeverly High Robbers hit jewelry Finding Some Humor In • • • project of three towers. will reduce the area of their nine-acre photosClass of '88 Reunion Page 4 sbriefstore on Beverly Drive Page 5 rudyTroubling Times,cole Hopefully Page 6 ALSO ON THE WEB Secondly, this is NOT a hotel project that property that is covered by buildings from Beverly Hills www.bhweekly.com adds financial benefits to the city. It is a 67% to 47%. A twenty percent reduction letters condo project that adds huge benefits to is not much when you consider how much WeeklySERVING BEVERLY HILLS • BEVERLYWOOD • LOS ANGELES the developer’s pocket from the quick of the area viewed from the streets will be Issue 470 • October 2 - October 8, 2008 return of their investment upon the sale of covered by concrete and that all three new & the condos. City Council and Planning towers are adjacent to streets. Also, the Living In The City email Commissioners agreed about the benefits Hilton never gives you a sense of how of having an additional luxury hotel in our much green you will actually see from the “Stone and Lawn Signs of the Times” city since we receive a major portion of exterior, not much.
    [Show full text]
  • Aarch Matters
    AARCH MATTERS COVID-19 UPDATE: The effects of the novel coronavirus have affected us all, especially impacting the ability of nonprofits and cultural organizations like AARCH to deliver its usual slate of rich slate of programming and events. It is at this time we must remain resilient. Although this year’s events may be postponed and/or cancelled, we are remaining optimistic that we will bring this content to YOU in some way going forward. Please READ ON, and carry our message of resilience, hope, and love, even if we may not be able to share in our adventures together in person this year. Be safe, and remember that the sun will continue to rise each day. A PATCHWORK of RESILIENCE CHRONICLING SUSTAINABILITY, ENERGY, WORK, AND STORIES EMBODIED IN OUR REGION Resilience – “the capacity to recover quickly from difficulties” – is a trait escaping enslavement, early 20th century Chinese freedom seekers jailed that allows plants, animals, and humans to adapt and even thrive in as they came south from Canada, and the thousands of immigrants now adversity. And it is a characteristic that we admire and learn from, as it’s flooding across a tiny, illegal crossing to find security and hope in Canada. what makes or should make each generation better than the last. In this Or there is the story of how Inez Milholland and other North Country era of looming climate change and now with the scourge of the women fought for their right to vote and be heard, and the extraordinary coronavirus sweeping across the globe, we’ve realized that we need to story of Isaac Johnson, a formerly enslaved African American stone create a world that is safer, sustainable, more equitable, and resilient and mason who settled in the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa's Coming
    PALIHI’S SUPER BOWL ‘TROPHY’ Vol. 2, No. 3 • December 2, 2015 Uniting the Community with News, Features and Commentary Circulation: 15,000 • $1.00 See Page 25 Turkey Trotting Time ‘Citizen’ Kilbride To Be Honored December 10 By LAURIE ROSENTHAL Staff Writer itizen of the Year Sharon Kilbride lives in the Santa Monica Canyon Chome that she grew up in, on prop- erty that has been in the family since 1839. The original land grant—Rancho Boca de Santa Monica—once encompassed 6,656 acres, and stretched from where Topanga Canyon meets the ocean to what is now San Vicente around 20th Street. Six generations of the Marquez family have lived in Santa Monica Canyon, which was a working rancho. Kilbride’s great-grandfather, Miguel Mar - quez, built the original house, the same one where Kilbride’s mother, Rosemary Close to 1,400 runners spent early Thanksgiving morning running in the third annual Banc of California Turkey Trot, be- Romero Marquez, grew up. According to ginning and ending at Palisades High. (See story, page 27). Photo: Shelby Pascoe Kilbride’s brother, Fred, “The property has never been bought or sold.” Rosemary attended Canyon School, as Ho!Ho!Ho! Santa’s Coming (Continued on Page 4) By SUE PASCOE DRB May Discuss Editor anta and Mrs. Claus are coming to Pacific Palisades for Caruso’s Plans the Chamber’s traditional Ho!Ho!Ho! festivities on Friday, The Design Review Board will hold a December 4, from 5 to 8 p.m. regularly scheduled meeting at 7 p.m. on S Wednesday, December 9, at the Palisades After the reindeer land, Station 69 firefighters will load the Clauses onto a firetruck and deliver them to Swarthmore.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefs • Speakers Blast Board of Education
    photos • CECI Soiree Under the Stars Page 10 briefs • Speakers blast Board of Education rudy cole • photos • 2nd and 3rd Generation for $1.5-million “investment” home purchase Page 2 Opinions, reflections Page 6 Beverly High Graduates Pages 8-9 ALSO ON THE WEB Beverly Hills www.bhweekly.com WeeklySERVING BEVERLY HILLS • BEVERLYWOOD • LOS ANGELES Issue 665 • June 28 - July 4, 2012 Summer Reading What are your neighbors reading? cover story • pages 10-11 City Council reasserts opposition to tunnel under Beverly High, hires special counsel Princeton Credit, LLC, one of three ven- really beneficial where we’re not spending briefs • Libow represented BHUSD rudy cole • New graduation photos • in “investment” home purchase Page 3 board debacle Page 6 Pages 8-9 dors to respond to the district’s request for money on interest, we’re spending money ALSO ON THE WEB Beverly Hills www.bhweekly.com proposal, will finance $1.6 million. on principal, which means we’re building President Brian Goldberg has said the equity.” briefs municipal financing the BHUSD is get- Based on his research, Goldberg said WeeklySERVING BEVERLY HILLS • BEVERLYWOOD • LOS ANGELES Issue 664 • June 21 - June 27, 2012 ting for the home purchase is favorable he believed the house would rent for Speakers blast Board of because it requires no money down. Prior approximately $4,500–$5,500 on the open Education for approving to Tuesday’s vote, the BHUSD made market. a $46,000 deposit, but Goldberg said When asked to comment that the district $11,000 monthly Princeton Credit would reimburse the is investing at a loss if rent collected is less expenditure for $1.5-million deposit to the general fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Read This Issue
    VIEW 2019 VIEW from the Director’s Office Dear Friends of LALH, This year’s VIEW reflects our recent sharpening focus on California, from the Bay Area to San Diego. We open with an article by JC Miller about Robert Royston’s final project, the Harris garden in Palm Springs, which he worked on personally and continues to develop with the owners. A forthcoming LALH book on Royston by Miller and Reuben M. Rainey, the fourth volume in our Masters of Modern Landscape Design series, will be released early next year at Modernism Week in Palm Springs. Both article and book feature new photographs by the stellar landscape photographer Millicent Harvey. Next up, Kenneth I. Helphand explores Lawrence Halprin’s extraordinary drawings and their role in his de- sign process. “I find that I think most effectively graphically,” Halprin explained, and Helphand’s look at Halprin’s prolific notebook sketches and drawings vividly illuminates the creative symbiosis that led to the built works. The California theme continues with an introduction to Paul Thiene, the German-born landscape architect who super- vised the landscape development of the 1915 Panama-California Exposition in San Diego and went on to establish a thriving practice in the Southland. Next, the renowned architect Marc Appleton writes about his own Santa Barbara garden, Villa Corbeau, inspired—as were so many of Thiene’s designs—by Italy. The influence of Italy was also major in the career of Lockwood de Forest Jr. Here, Ann de Forest remembers her grandparents and their Santa Barbara home as the family archives, recently donated by LALH, are moved to the Architecture & Design Collections at UC Santa Barbara.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Final Report of Issues and Opportunities Beverly Hills General
    Final Report of Issues and Opportunities Beverly Hills General Plan Community Character Committee I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................... i II. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 4 III. CITY COUNCIL CHARGE ...................................................................................... 5 IV. EDUCATIONAL PROCESS .................................................................................... 5 V. WORKPLAN............................................................................................................ 5 VI. IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES......................................... 7 Issue 1: Character-Defining Elements of Streetscapes ........................................ 8 Residential Objectives............................................................................. 8 Citywide Objectives................................................................................. 9 "Grand Boulevard" Vision for Wilshire Boulevard.................................. 10 i. Sub-Area 1: Wilshire Boulevard: Western City Limit to Crescent Drive .............. 11 ii: Sub-Area 2: Wilshire Boulevard: Crescent Drive to Robertson Boulevard.......... 12 iii: Sub-Area 3: Wilshire Boulevard: Robertson Boulevard to Eastern City Limit ...... 14 Commercial Corridor Objectives ........................................................... 15 i: Sub-Area 4: Olympic Boulevard.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1048 S Los Angeles Street Is Located Less Than Three Miles from the Ferrante, a Massive 1,500-Unit Construction Project, Scheduled for Completion in 2021
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM A Signalized Corner Mixed-Use Retail and Office Property Ideally located in the heart of Downtown Los Angeles in the Iconic Fashion District brandonmichaelsgroup.com INVESTMENT ADVISORS Brandon Michaels Senior Managing Director of Investments Senior Director, National Retail Group Tel: 818.212-2794 [email protected] CA License: 01434685 Matthew Luchs First Vice President Investments COO of The Brandon Michaels Group Tel: 818.212.2727 [email protected] CA License: 01948233 Ben Brownstein Senior Investment Associate National Retail Group National Industrial Properties Group Tel: 818.212.2812 [email protected] CA License: 02012808 Contents 04 Executive Summary 10 Property Overview 16 Area Overview 28 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Executive Summary 4 1048 S. Los Angeles St The Offering A Signalized Corner Mixed-Use Retail and Office Property Ideally located in the heart of Downtown Los Angeles in the Iconic Fashion District The Brandon Michaels Group of Marcus & Millichap has been selected to exclusively represent for sale 1048 South Los Angeles Street, a two-story multi-tenant mixed-use retail and office property ideally located on the Northeast signalized corner of Los Angeles Street and East 11th Street. The property is comprised of 15 rental units, with eight retail units on the ground floor, and seven office units on the second story. 1048 South Los Angeles Street is to undergo a $170 million renovation. currently 86% occupied. Three units are The property is located in the heart of vacant, one of which is on the ground the iconic fashion district of Downtown floor, and two of which are on the Los Angeles, which is home to over second story.
    [Show full text]
  • Iii. Environmental Setting
    III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This Section provides a brief overview of the Project Site’s regional and local setting. Additional descriptions of the environmental setting as it relates to each of the environmental issues analyzed in this EIR are included in the environmental setting discussions contained within Sections IV.A through IV.N of this EIR. A list of related projects, which is used as the basis for the discussion of cumulative impacts in each section is also provided. 1. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Regional Setting b. Local Setting and Land Uses c. Surrounding Land Uses 2. RELATED PROJECTS Wilshire Grand Redevelopment Project III. Environmental Setting Draft Environmental Impact Report Page III-1 City of Los Angeles July 2010 1. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING a. Regional Setting The Project Site is located in Los Angeles County, in the Central City (downtown) area of the City of Los Angeles (the “City”) (see Section II [Project Description], Figure II-1 [Regional and Project Vicinity Map]). The Project Site is also located in the Financial Core district of downtown Los Angeles, which is bordered by South Park to the south and southwest, the Historic Core to the east and southeast, Bunker Hill to the north and northeast, and City West to the west and northwest across the US/Interstate 110 (the “Harbor Freeway”) (see Figure II-3 [Downtown Context Map] in Section II [Project Description]). Regional access to the Project Site is provided via the Harbor Freeway approximately 0.04 mile west of the Project Site. Wilshire Boulevard, Figueroa Street, and Olympic Boulevard serve as the primary arterial roadways providing access to the area surrounding the Project Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Improvements on Melrose Avenue East of San Vicente
    VC`QV0VJ%V `Q]QVR1I]`Q0VIVJ QJVC`QV0VJ%VV: Q`:J1HVJ VQ%CV0:`R8V`1:C].Q Q^ Q]_.Q1V61J$HQJR1QJ8C:J^:GQ0V_ .Q1 .VVC1I1J:QJQ` .VQJVRGCQH@CQJ$V6 `:V: GQ%JRC:JVQJVC`QV0VJ%V5`V]C:HVIVJ Q`:J$CVR]:`@1J$11 .]:`:CCVC ]:`@1J$5:1J$CVHVJ V`C:JV11 ..Q` C:JRH:]VRIVR1:J5:JR`V%CJ$11RV`1RV1:C@8 26 the avenues district streetscape master plan san vicente boulevard to doheny drive .1V$IVJ Q`VC`QV0VJ%VH%``VJ C7.:CV]VRV `1:J:H01 7 .:J .V Melrose Ave. V$IVJ Q .VV: 8Q1V0V`5]VRV `1:J:H01 71V6]VH VR Q1JH`V:V: JV1.Q]:JR`V :%`:J :`V:RRVRQ0V`IV:JR .V`QCCQ11J$ `VV H:]V 1I]`Q0VIVJ :`VHQI]CV VR8 [ RR.:``Q1I:`@1J$8 [ :1J :1JV61J$]:`:CCVCH%`G1RV]:`@1J$:JR`V]C:HVV61J$:J$CVR]:`@1J$ 11 .]:`:CCVC]:`@1J$8.V`V]C:HVIVJ Q`:J$CVR]:`@1J$11 .]:`:CCVC]:`@1J$1 VI: VR Q`VR%HVH%`G1RV]:`@1J$1J .1V$IVJ G7:GQ% ]:HV8 [ RRH%`GV6 VJ1QJQJVC`QV0VJ%V:JRH`Q `VV : IQ HQ`JV`8 .VV6HV]QJ:`V .VJQ` .V: HQ`JV`Q`VC`QV0VJ%V:JR:J1HVJ V Q%CV0:`R:JR:CC`Q%`HQ`JV`Q`VC`QV0VJ%V:JRQGV` QJQ%CV0:`R5 1.1H.11CCJQ .:0VH%`GV6 VJ1QJ8 [ RRJV1 `VV `VV11 .$`: V:JRJV1 `VV C1$. 8 [ RRH`Q1:C@I:`@1J$QJ:CC`Q%`CV$^ `VV _Q` .V1J V`VHQJ: VC`QV 0VJ%V:JR:VV``10V8 [ 1RVJ1RV1:C@QJGQ .1RVQ`VC`QV0VJ%V Q `VV G7`V]C:H1J$ :J$CVRH%`G1RV]:`@1J$11 .]:`:CCVCH%`G1RV]:`@1J$8 7]1H:C1RV1:C@QJVC`QV0VJ%V GV 1VVJ:J1HVJ VQ%CV0:`R:JR Q.VJ7`10V8.V1RV1:C@11CCGV `VV 11RV861J$]:`@1:7:JR]C:J VR `VV1VCC11CCGV`V]C:HVRG7`Q%``QQ G7V1$.
    [Show full text]