Tax Policies for 4% Growth: Evidence from the States, American History, Markets, and Nations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tax Policies for 4% Growth: Evidence from the States, American History, Markets, and Nations Tax Policies for 4% Growth: Evidence From the States, American History, Markets, and Nations ––––––––––––––– ––––––––––––––– APRIL 10, 2012 | NEW YORK ––––––––––––––– ––––––––––––––– Transcript by PremierTranscription.com Tax Policies for 4% Growth: Evidence From the States, American History, Markets, and Nations ––––––––––––––– ––––––––––––––– APRIL 10, 2012 | NEW YORK ––––––––––––––– ––––––––––––––– Emcee: Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome the President of the George W. Bush Foundation, the Honorable Mark Langdale. Honorable Mark Langdale: Good morning. Welcome to the New York Historic Society. Three years ago, President Bush and Laura Bush came home to Texas, and they started writing their books. They also started the development of the George W. Bush Presidential Center on the campus of Southern Methodist University. It’s designed by New York’s own Robert A.M. Stern. It’s a beautiful building that will be finished at the end of the year. A year from now, in April, we will dedicate the building at a ceremony in Dallas, and half the building will be given to the federal government to be the permanent home of the George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum. It’ll be a place where people can come and study and learn about the presidency of George W. Bush and he and Laura’s public service. The other half of the building will become the permanent home of the George W. Bush Institute. The institute has also been working for three years, started up by President Bush and Laura Bush to be a platform for the continuing service on issues that they’re really interested in. For the last three years we have launched a program to eradicate cervical cancer on the continent of Africa. We’ve worked to empower women in the Middle East to be an agent of change there. We’ve worked to inspire and document the work of dissidents who are trying to bring freedom to their home countries, and today we launch or continue the launch of our economic growth perspective in the 4 percent growth area. I’d like to especially recognize today a couple of members who have helped bring the institute and the center along: our Chairman of the Board, Donald Evans here, board member Craig Stapleton, Karl Rove and Edward Lazear, who are on the board of our institute, guiding what happens and what we work on with the institute, and Dean Al Niemi, who will be on a panel later today. SMU has been a great partner of ours as we build the center at SMU. So at the time, I’d like to introduce to you the founding Director of the George W. Bush Institute, a smart and busy man, James K. Glassman. Honorable James Glassman: Thank you. Thank you, Mark. Good morning, everyone. This conference was conceived and organized by Amity Shlaes, a Senior Fellow of the Bush Institute and Director of our 4% Growth Project. We launched that project a year ago at a major conference in Dallas that included four winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics. The project’s goal is to research, discover and promote ways for the United States to achieve sustainable, real 4 percent growth or about twice the rate that’s now being projected by many economists for the United States. We want to change the conversation in America so that it centers on growth. You’ll hear from Amity on a panel later today, but in the meantime, let me try to channel her. Amity has been saying now, for the five months that this conference has been in the works, that this is not going to be a boring conference. It is, at its core, about competition. People like competition. It’s fun. That’s why people go to baseball games. Tax competition is a reality, yet the tax debate usually ignores competition, and many analysts just disapprove of it. We don’t. We like it. We think it’s exciting and uplifting, and everybody gains. Competition makes the global pie bigger, but there’s no doubt that bigger national and state incentives make a bigger slice of that pie at home. George W. Bush Presidential Center Page 2 of 90 Tax Policies for 4% Growth New York | 04-10-12 People say economics is the dismal science. It is not. It’s actually a happy science, because it is the science of choice, and at its core, choice is all about human freedom. Economics is about the decisions that people make and the incentives that drive those decisions. Public policy plays a key role in determining the incentives, and tax policy is the most powerful of those public policies. The way it’s structured can get people to work more or less, to invest more or less, to start more or fewer new firms and expand more or fewer current ones. In Europe, people work a full one-third less than we do, and the Nobel Economist Edward Prescott, who presented at our conference in Dallas, has shown that the reason isn’t culture. It isn’t climate. It’s the marginal tax rate. Nations and states that want to work more and invest more and thus have more opportunity and prosperity understand that they are in a global and national tax competition, as we’re going to see today. In a way, much of what we will be doing today is looking from results to causes. So if strong growth is the desired end, we ask the question who grows. We’ll look at countries, at states, at America at different times in its history. There are places and times where growth has been particularly strong. We want to know whether tax policies are at the root of that success and which tax policies. The governors who are here with us today understand the incentives that produce growth. Governor Haslam’s state of Tennessee already has no personal state income tax, and that may be the reason that his state has outstripped his neighbor, Missouri, which does have such a tax, in personal income and GDP and in employment. The governors of Kansas, Oklahoma, Maine and New Jersey, who are also here with us today, are all moving to cut their state’s tax rates. They understand the power of incentives and competition. In the two panels that follow the opening addresses, we will turn the spotlight on state taxes and what they mean to state growth and to national growth. These sessions will be followed by a panel on international tax competition and one on the U.S. government record on taxes throughout history and conclusions we can draw from it. Next, we’ll break for lunch, followed by an address by Representative Paul Ryan, then panels on markets and taxes, on the real life impact of taxes on the people who run businesses, and then we’ll look at what we’ve learned in a star-studded panel called Blitz Solutions, what we should do, in a practical sense, to win the tax competition. Then we’ll close with a reception sponsored by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. I’d like to thank the Chamber for its sponsorship of this event, as well as our other sponsors, the Bosarge Family Foundation, Jean and Rex Sinquefield and Tina and Byron Trott and our media partner Forbes. We are a Dallas-based organization. We like being in the Heartland of America. So what on Earth are we doing here in New York? Not only is this the white-hot center of business and finance in the United States. It’s a city built on global trade, innovation and competition, and what better place for this conference than the New York Historical Society, founded in 1804 with deep roots in the commerce of this city? And also with deep roots in the commerce of this city is our next speaker, Steve Forbes. Steve’s grandfather, B.C. Forbes, was a journalist who immigrated to New York from Scotland and started a great eponymous business magazine that he presided over for 37 years and passed on to his talented son Malcolm. Today under Steve Forbes, with its international editions, Forbes has a circulation of more than six million. Steve has successfully led the company’s transition to the Internet age with Forbes.com, with 25 million unique monthly visitors and websites in the Real Clear family. Steve served under President George H. W. Bush as Chairman of the Board of International Broadcasting, and in both 1996 and 2000, he sought the Republican nomination for President, running on a principle platform, focused on growth, driven by low marginal tax rates. In 2000, he ran third in the New Hampshire primary and second in the Iowa caucuses, and I can’t for the life of me remember who beat him. George W. Bush Presidential Center Page 3 of 90 Tax Policies for 4% Growth New York | 04-10-12 Speaking of happy, which is what we want this conference to be, there is no happier campaigner, no more optimistic campaigner for freedom and growth than Steve Forbes. Steve. Steve Forbes: Well, thank you very much, Jim, for those very kind words, and thank everyone with the Bush Institute for making today possible. This meeting couldn’t be more timely, and even though I tried to do something in 2000, obviously it didn’t work, which is why I’m doing the introducing today, but it is a great honor. We should recall President Bush’s two tax cuts, particularly the big one in 2003. Many people today don’t remember that President Bush inherited a faltering economy when he came into office.
Recommended publications
  • June 2018 June 3Rd, 2018 19 Men and 6 Women NBC's Meet the Press
    June 2018 June 3rd, 2018 19 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 5 men and 1 woman Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) PM Justin Trudeau (M) Joshua Johnson (M) Peggy Noonan (W) Rich Lowry (M) Ben Rhodes (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan: 5 men and 2 women Gov. John Kasich (M) Rep. Will Hurd (M) Frm. Amb. Robert Gallucci (M) Dr. Jung Pak (W) David Nakamura (M) Susan Page (W) Michael Crowley (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 5 men and 2 women Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) Frm. Amb. Bill Richardson (M) Tom Bossert (M) Sue Mi Terry (W) Frm. Speaker Newt Gingrich (M) Karen Finney (W) Patrick Gaspard (M) CNN's State of the Union with Jake Tapper: *With Guest Host Dana Bash 1 man and 1 woman Rep. Kevin McCarthy (M) Minister Chrystia Freeland (W) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 3 men and 0 women Corey Lewandowski (M) Guy Benson (M) Larry Kudlow (M) June 10th, 2018 13 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: No Data Available CBS's Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan: 4 men and 4 women Frm. Amb. Susan Rice (W) Dir. Larry Kudlow (M) Sen. Edward Markey (M) Evan Osnos (M) Seung Min Kim (W) Selena Zito (W) Molly Ball (W) Kenneth Starr (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 1 man and 0 women Jonathan Cheng (M) CNN's State of the Union with Jake Tapper: 1 man and 2 women Dir.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: the Unmaking of America: a Recent History
    Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History Introduction xiv “If infectious greed is the virus” Kurt Andersen, “City of Schemes,” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 2002. xvi “run of pedal-to-the-medal hypercapitalism” Kurt Andersen, “American Roulette,” New York, December 22, 2006. xx “People of the same trade” Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner, 1776 (London: Penguin, 1999) Book I, Chapter X. Chapter 1 4 “The discovery of America offered” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Library of America, 2012), Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “A new science of politics” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “The inhabitants of the United States” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Chapter XVIII. 5 “there was virtually no economic growth” Robert J Gordon. “Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds.” Policy Insight No. 63. Centre for Economic Policy Research, September, 2012. --Thomas Piketty, “World Growth from the Antiquity (growth rate per period),” Quandl. 6 each citizen’s share of the economy Richard H. Steckel, “A History of the Standard of Living in the United States,” in EH.net (Economic History Association, 2020). --Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016), p. 98. 6 “Constant revolutionizing of production” Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969), Chapter I. 7 from the early 1840s to 1860 Tomas Nonnenmacher, “History of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Intentional Disregard: Trump's Authoritarianism During the COVID
    INTENTIONAL DISREGARD Trump’s Authoritarianism During the COVID-19 Pandemic August 2020 This report is dedicated to those who have suffered and lost their lives to the COVID-19 virus and to their loved ones. Acknowledgments This report was co-authored by Sylvia Albert, Keshia Morris Desir, Yosef Getachew, Liz Iacobucci, Beth Rotman, Paul S. Ryan and Becky Timmons. The authors thank the 1.5 million Common Cause supporters whose small-dollar donations fund more than 70% of our annual budget for our nonpartisan work strengthening the people’s voice in our democracy. Thank you to the Common Cause National Governing Board for its leadership and support. We also thank Karen Hobert Flynn for guidance and editing, Aaron Scherb for assistance with content, Melissa Brown Levine for copy editing, Kerstin Vogdes Diehn for design, and Scott Blaine Swenson for editing and strategic communications support. This report is complete as of August 5, 2020. ©2020 Common Cause. Printed in-house. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................ 3 President Trump’s ad-lib pandemic response has undermined government institutions and failed to provide states with critically needed medical supplies. .............5 Divider in Chief: Trump’s Politicization of the Pandemic .................................... 9 Trump has amplified special interest-funded “liberate” protests and other “reopen” efforts, directly contradicting public health guidance. ...................9 Trump and his enablers in the Senate have failed to appropriate adequate funds to safely run this year’s elections. .........................................11 President Trump has attacked voting by mail—the safest, most secure way to cast ballots during the pandemic—for purely personal, partisan advantage. ..............12 The Trump administration has failed to safeguard the health of detained and incarcerated individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Amity Shlaes, Esteemed Scholar and Author, a 2021 Bradley Prize Winner Award Recognizes Extraordinary Talent, Dedication to American Exceptionalism
    For Immediate Release Contact: Christine Czernejewski July 29, 2021 414-982-6684 Amity Shlaes, Esteemed Scholar and Author, a 2021 Bradley Prize Winner Award recognizes extraordinary talent, dedication to American exceptionalism Milwaukee, WI - The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation announced today that distinguished scholar and author Amity Shlaes is one of three winners of the 2021 Bradley Prizes. The honor recognizes individuals whose outstanding achievements reflect The Bradley Foundation’s mission to restore, strengthen and protect the principles and institutions of American exceptionalism. Shlaes will receive the award at the 17th annual Bradley Prizes ceremony on Monday, September 13th at the National Building Museum in Washington, D.C. “Amity’s exhaustive research and analysis of American economic history continues to inform influential decision makers,” said Rick Graber, President and CEO of The Bradley Foundation. “Her insight into how well-intentioned government programs have had the opposite effect of what they set out to achieve, provides valuable lessons for today. The Bradley Foundation is proud to honor Amity for her scholarship, which has contributed to important dialogue on economic policy.” Shlaes chairs the board of the Calvin Coolidge Presidential Foundation, the official foundation dedicated to preserving and promoting the legacy of America’s 30th president. The Coolidge Foundation is the sponsor of the popular Coolidge Scholarship, a full college scholarship for academic merit, and the Coolidge Senators program, which hosts 100 students each summer for a stay in Washington at Coolidge House to learn them about the values of President Coolidge. Shlaes’ most recent book is Great Society: A New History.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full What Happened Collection [PDF]
    American Compass December 2020 WHAT HAPPENED THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY IN REVIEW AMERICAN COMPASS is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, launched in May 2020 with a mission to restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity— REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions; SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self-sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next generation for the same; and HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. www.americancompass.org [email protected] What Happened: The Trump Presidency in Review Table of Contents FOREWORD: THE WORK REMAINS President Trump told many important truths, but one also has to act by Daniel McCarthy 1 INTRODUCTION 4 TOO FEW OF THE PRESIDENT’S MEN An iconoclast’s administration will struggle to find personnel both experienced and aligned by Rachel Bovard 5 A POPULISM DEFERRED Trump’s transitional presidency lacked the vision and agenda necessary to let go of GOP orthodoxy by Julius Krein 11 THE POTPOURRI PRESIDENCY A decentralized and conflicted administration was uniquely inconsistent in its policy actions by Wells King 17 SOME LIKE IT HOT Unsustainable economic stimulus at an expansion’s peak, not tax cuts or tariffs, fueled the Trump boom by Oren Cass 23 Copyright © 2020 by American Compass, Inc. Electronic versions of these articles with hyperlinked references are available at www.americancompass.org.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Budget for Fiscal Year 2013
    S. HRG. 112–733 PRESIDENT’S BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Finance U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 79–764—PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 20:27 Mar 25, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 R:\DOCS\79764.000 TIMD COMMITTEE ON FINANCE MAX BAUCUS, Montana, Chairman JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah KENT CONRAD, North Dakota CHUCK GRASSLEY, Iowa JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona RON WYDEN, Oregon MIKE CRAPO, Idaho CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York PAT ROBERTS, Kansas DEBBIE STABENOW, Michigan MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming MARIA CANTWELL, Washington JOHN CORNYN, Texas BILL NELSON, Florida TOM COBURN, Oklahoma ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey JOHN THUNE, South Dakota THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland RUSSELL SULLIVAN, Staff Director CHRIS CAMPBELL, Republican Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 20:27 Mar 25, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 R:\DOCS\79764.000 TIMD C O N T E N T S OPENING STATEMENTS Page Baucus, Hon. Max, a U.S. Senator from Montana, chairman, Committee on Finance ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Remarks Prior to a Meeting
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Remarks Prior to a Meeting with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore and an Exchange With Reporters in New York City September 23, 2019 President Trump. Well, thank you very much. As we just said, we signed a very important agreement having to do with defense and mutual defense and, I guess you could say, mutual offense also. But we—we're now going to talk about trade. We do tremendous amounts of trade with Singapore. And the Prime Minister—highly respected. One of the truly most respected men anywhere in the world. And he's been my friend for a long time. And we're doing very well. But we do tremendous trade with Singapore, and we appreciate it very much, Mr. Prime Minister. Prime Minister Lee. Well, thank you, Mr. President. As you said, we just signed an agreement to extend our memorandum of understanding on defense cooperation. President Trump. Right. Prime Minister Lee. It's the second time we are extending this. It reflects a very good defense relationship we have between the two countries, but also reflects our broader cooperation and friendship. And, in economics, we have an FTA between the U.S. and Singapore. President Trump. Right. Prime Minister Lee. The volume of trade is substantial and the volume of investments too. In Singapore, you are one—you are our most important foreign investor. And, in America, as small as we are, we have $55 billion worth of investments—— President Trump. That's not too bad. Prime Minister Lee.
    [Show full text]
  • US Elections
    U.S. Elections: Policy and Market Implications BY PAUL HOFFMEISTER OCTOBER 5, 2016 MONEY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE - 2016 EMERGING ASSET MANAGERS FORUM COPYRIGHT 2016 Contents o Election Outlook o Tax and Trade Outlook o Market Implications o Investment Frameworks o Biggest Policy Surprise? 2 Does it matter who becomes the next President? The post-WW2 statistics… Real GDP ◦ Democratic Presidents: 4.35% ◦ Republican Presidents: 2.54% Unemployment ◦ Democratic Presidents: Fell 0.8 percentage points ◦ Republican Presidents: Rose 1.1 percentage points Inflation ◦ Fared similarly S&P 500 Returns (annualized) ◦ Democratic Presidents 8.08% ◦ Republican Presidents 2.70% Source: "Presidents and the U.S. Economy: An Econometric Exploration", Alan S. Blinder and Mark W. Watson, Woodrow Wilson School and Department of Economics, Princeton University, July 2014 3 Race for the White House Will it be Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump? ◦ Clinton: ◦ Betting Markets ◦ PredictIt.org 68% probability ◦ Iowa Electronic Markets 67% (compared to 80% on August 17) ◦ Trump: ◦ USC/LA Times Poll: Trump 46.3%, Clinton 42.4% ◦ Brexit vote phenomenon ◦ Remain traded 85% likelihood on election day ◦ Trump has consistently defied betting markets (e.g. early and late GOP primaries) ◦ Swing states: Ohio +5, Florida +3, Nevada +2 (as of September 14) ◦ Nate Silver (FiveThirtyEight.com): ◦ Probability: Clinton 55.8%, Trump 44.2% ◦ Electoral Votes: Clinton 278.3 electoral votes, Trump 259.4 4 What Party will control the Senate? Democrats need 4 if Clinton wins, 5 if Trump wins. 11
    [Show full text]
  • Playing Fair: Distribution, Economic Growth, and Fairness in Federal and State Tax Debates
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\51-1\HLL103.txt unknown Seq: 1 12-FEB-14 13:45 SYMPOSIUM: CLASS IN AMERICA PLAYING FAIR: DISTRIBUTION, ECONOMIC GROWTH, AND FAIRNESS IN FEDERAL AND STATE TAX DEBATES JOSEPH D. HENCHMAN* AND CHRISTOPHER L. STEPHENS** Intuitions of fairness drive many federal and state tax policy decisions. But these intuitions, however strongly felt, can be exceedingly difficult to operation- alize and implement without unforeseen consequences. This Article examines several salient examples of such policies, including the estate tax, the Bush tax cuts, the Alternative Minimum Tax, the Buffett Rule, and state millionaires’ taxes. In doing so, this Article attempts to reveal flaws in the redistributive impulse for taxation policy by assessing some of its political and economic ramifications as well as the unreliable measurements of fairness that form the foundation of these policies. “[T]he present tax code contains special preferences and provi- sions, all of which narrow the tax base (thus requiring higher rates), artificially distort the use of resources, inhibit the mobility and formation of capital, add complexities and inequities which undermine the morale of the taxpayer, and make tax avoidance rather than market factors a prime consideration in too many eco- nomic decisions.” —President John F. Kennedy1 I. INTRODUCTION In May 2012, presidential candidate Mitt Romney confidentially told guests at a fundraiser that “[47%] of Americans pay no income tax” and that “they will vote for this president no matter what.”2 Secretly recorded and released in September of that year, the videotaped comments severely, perhaps fatally, damaged Romney’s chances of defeating President Barack Obama.3 * Vice President for Legal & State Projects at the Tax Foundation, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Buffett Rule for Social Security and Medicare: Phasing out Benefits for High Income Retirees
    Penn State Law eLibrary Journal Articles Faculty Works 1-1-2012 A Buffett Rule foro S cial Security and Medicare: Phasing Out Benefits for High Income Retirees Samuel C. Thompson Jr. Penn State Law Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works Part of the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Samuel C. Thompson Jr., A Buffett Rule for Social Security and Medicare: Phasing Out Benefits of r High Income Retirees, 50 U. Louisville L. Rev. 603 (2012). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Works at Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A BUFFETT RULE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE: PHASING OUT BENEFITS FOR HIGH INCOME RETIREES Samuel C. Thompson, Jr. I. INTRODUCTION A. Three Deficit and Debt Proposals The concern with the federal budget deficits' and the growing federal debe has brought forth three principal proposals: (1) the December 2010 proposal by the bipartisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (the Deficit Commission Proposal);3 (2) the April 2011 Fiscal Year 2012 Budget Resolution, The Path to Prosperity, advanced by Congressman Paul Ryan, the Republican chairman of the House Committee on the Budget (the Ryan Proposal);4 and (3) the proposal of President Obama set out in a speech he gave at George Washington University on . I would like to thank the following for their helpful comments on this paper: the faculty members at the Penn State Dickinson School of Law who participated in a forum on the paper; Professor Richard Kaplan of the University of Illinois College of Law, an expert in income tax and elder law; Professor Joel Handler of the UCLA School of Law; and my research assistants at the Penn State Dickinson School of Law: Stephen Anderson, Marc Boiron, Grace Hahn, Jake Mattinson, and Becky Sue Thompson.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Branch
    EXECUTIVE BRANCH THE PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, 45th President of the United States; born in Queens, NY, June 14, 1946; graduated from New York Military Academy in Cornwall, NY, in 1964; received a bachelor of science degree in economics in 1968 from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, PA; joined Trump Management Company in 1968; became president of the Trump Organization in 1971 until 2016, when elected President of the United States; family: married to Melania; five children: Donald Jr., Ivanka, Eric, Tiffany, and Barron; nine grandchildren; elected as President of the United States on November 8, 2016, and took the oath of office on January 20, 2017. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500 Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB), 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20500, phone (202) 456–1414, http://www.whitehouse.gov The President of the United States.—Donald J. Trump. Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Oval Office Operations.—Jordan Karem. Executive Assistant to the President.—Madeleine Westerhout. OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT phone (202) 456–1414 The Vice President.—Mike Pence. Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to the Vice President.—Nick Ayers. Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor to the Vice President.—Keith Kellogg. Deputy Assistants to the President and Deputy Chiefs of Staff to the Vice President: Jarrod Agen, John Horne. Deputy Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff to Mrs. Karen Pence.—Jana Toner. Deputy Assistant to the President and Domestic Policy Director to the Vice President.— Steve Pinkos.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    IN QUESTION The Lifeworth Annual Review of Corporate Responsibility in 2009 By Jem Bendell, with Ian Doyle, Jonathan Cohen, Emma Irwin LIFEWORTH 2010 and Nicky Black. 0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Capitalism in Question: The Lifeworth Annual Review of Corporate Responsibility in 2009. Jem Bendell thanks Ian Doyle for working with him throughout 2009 on a variety of projects and in particular the quarterly world reviews, Written by Jem Bendell, with Ian Doyle, Jonathan Cohen, and my other co-authors. Also to my father Emma Irwin and Nicky Black. Peter, for use of his house in Spain, and Olivier Hertzel and Benny at 'La Ferme Cheese' and Matthew Slater at CommunityForge, who helped provide a suitably cheap writing Copyright Jem Bendell. environment in Auroville, in India. Thanks to Malcolm McIntosh for supporting this final edition of the Lifeworth Annual Review, and Michael Powell for the previous support from Griffith University to bring it this far. Thanks also to Dean Bargh and John Stuart at Greenleaf Publishing who have worked with Published February 1st 2010 by Lifeworth, as a free pdf me on these reviews for almost a decade. download from http://www.lifeworth.com/consult Thank you to Lifeworth Associate Janna Greve for proof reading the Introduction, Roger Burke for further proofreading and to Hanniah Tariq for the beautiful layout and further editing. Ian Doyle thanks each of his co-authors for their meticulous attention to detail in their writing and their adaptability in working as a team. He also thanks Jem Bendell for his This annual review incorporates the quarterly world reviews guidance and practical insights when writing these articles, of the leading academic Journal of Corporate Citizenship, and his extra-ordinary ability to think systemically.
    [Show full text]