South Ardmore Park Master Plan Update
DRAFT September 2014 -For Review-
TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MERION Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements ...... page 5
Introduction...... page 7
Section A – Background Information and Data...... page 11
Section B – Public Participation...... page 15
Section C – Site Information and Analysis...... page 17
Section D – Activities and Facilities Analysis ...... page 29
▪ Summary of the Master Plan Recommendations ...... page 31
Section E – Design Considerations...... page 39
Section F – Design Process...... page 41
Section G – Design Cost Estimates...... page 47
Section H – Appendix...... page 53
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 3
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following individuals were helpful in providing guidance and assistance during the preparation of this report. Their cooperation, enthusiasm, and encouragement were invaluable in completing this document:
South Ardmore Park Master Plan Study Committee
Lower Merion Township Commissioners V. Scott Zelov, P&R Committee Chair Anna Durbin, Ward 8 Commissioner Jane Dellheim, former Ward 8 Commissioner
Lower Merion Township Staff Lindsay Taylor, Director of Parks and Recreation Donna Heller, Recreation Supervisor Dave DeAngelis, Parks Supervisor Chris Leswing, Assistant Director of Planning Cliff Van Yahres, Township Arborist
Office of the Township Engineer Edward P. Pluciennik, PE, Township Engineer Diana Mancini, RLA
Environmental Advisory Council Kate Galer, Chair
Lower Merion School District Robert Schultz, Operations Foreman Donald Walsh, LMHS Athletic Director
Lower Merion Little League Marc Eisman
Lower Merion Soccer Club Biff Sturla
And a special thank you to all of the residents who participated in the public meetings.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 5
This project was financed in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund under the administration of the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 6
INTRODUCTION
In 2012, Lower Merion Township completed an update to the Comprehensive Parks & Recreation Plan . The purpose was to: • Complement the 2006 Lower Merion Open Space and Environmental Resources Protection Plan; • Serve as the Parks & Recreation element of the Township’s Comprehensive Plan; and • Comply with the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code Act 170, Section 503 (11).
The goal of updating the plan was to increase its effectiveness as a guide for the Township’s actions and decision-making in achieving its mission for parks and recreation:
“To help our citizens engage in active healthy lifestyles and to conserve our natural resources. We do this by collaborating with public and private sector partners and proving public service that is friendly, convenient and exceeds expectations.”
One recommendation contained in the Plan is for the Township to complete master plans for all of its parks. A master plan is an evolving long-term document that defines the future of a park and its place in the park system. Master plans recommend additions and renovations that will provide recreational opportunities, protect significant environmental resources and preserve key cultural resources using an open and public process.
South Ardmore Park is an 18 acre active park that is located in the middle of a developed residential neighborhood. It is considered the Township’s flagship active park. Its prior master plan was completed in 1997-98. The South Ardmore Park planning process focused on: • Providing facilities that respond to the leisure needs and interests of residents • Accessibility • Safety standards • Improving park circulation • Providing gathering spaces • Environmental sustainability • The park’s use and relationship with the surrounding neighborhood
The 2012 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan establishes five very important goals: 1. Enrich parks and recreation facilities as community destinations where residents can have fun, experience nature, socialize and exercise. 2. Conserve our natural resources by using best management practices in the parks for conservation, public education and partnerships. 3. Collaborate with Township planners on the redevelopment of the villages and on land development applications throughout the Township to ensure that public recreation facilities, opportunities and partnerships in recreation facilities, programs and management are incorporated into the improvements. 4. Engage the citizens in recreation to enrich their lives. 5. Provide operational excellence and financial stability that will garner widespread public support for parks and recreation.
The Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan identifies a series of specific actions that the Township can take to improve its parks and recreation services, and recommends a plan for their implementation. Many of the recommendations are general to various parks and not repeated here.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 7
Specific to South Ardmore Park, the Comprehensive Plan recommends updating the Master Plan. The Master Plan updates are called on to “focus on accessibility, safety standards, improving park circulation, gathering spaces, and environmental sustainability.” South Ardmore Park is cited as follows:
Goal 1: Enrich Parks and Recreation Facilities as community destinations where citizens can have fun, experience nature, socialize and exercise .
Objective 1: Increase the number and quality of sports fields. ▪ Convert the 60’ baseball field (Field C) to a 90’ field. ▪ Relocate the 60’ softball field (Field A) to eliminate overlapping outfields with Field B.
Objective 2: Continue to work with the Lower Merion School District on joint planning, development, use and maintenance of athletic fields and game courts. ▪ Work with the School District to improve athletic fields that are used by Lower Merion High School for its interscholastic sports teams.
Objective 5: Develop a playground planning and improvement program. ▪ Plan improvements unique to Lower Merion Township. ▪ Consider a theme for each playground.
Objective 6: Ensure that all parks include an environmental component as part of the park, design, operation and programming. ▪ Introduce rain gardens to infiltrate storm water runoff from courts and impervious surfaces. ▪ Add trees in non-programmed areas of the park for shade and to create intimate areas for informal enjoyment of the park.
Objective 7: Evaluate, design, and upgrade parks with consideration of safety and security of users. ▪ Follow principles of CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design), to maintain clear sight lines in the parks from public streets and sidewalks, locate recreation facilities for safety, limit vehicle penetration into the park as much as possible to avoid pedestrian/vehicle conflicts, and provide trails of adequate width for the intended users. ▪ Provide adequate safety zones surrounding ball fields. Do not locate trails, playgrounds and other facilities in foul ball zones. Separate spectator seating from ball fields with fencing. ▪ Continue to work towards meeting Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) Guidelines for Public Playground Safety in all playgrounds.
Objective 8: Provide accessible trails, viewing areas, and other accommodations to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). ▪ Develop trails within all parks to provide accessible routes from parking areas and sidewalks to recreation and support facilities. ▪ Provide stabilized handicap parking spaces in parking areas. ▪ Provide accessible viewing areas that are connected to an accessible route. ▪ Consider the needs of athletes with disabilities.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 8
▪ Develop playgrounds with play equipment that offers play options for children who are physically challenged ▪ Offer site amenities that accommodate persons with disabilities.
Objective 9: Design, plan and implement a Township-wide signage system for parks and recreation facilities. ▪ Build upon the Township’s signage system to establish a readily identifiable signage system for wayfinding, park and facility name, directions, rules and regulations, interpretation and information.
Objective 11: Create destinations in parks where people can gather and socialize. ▪ Add pavilions in parks for general picnic use.
Goal 2: Conserve our natural resources by using best management practices in the parks for conservation, public education and partnerships. Objective 3: Establish a philosophy of environmental sustainability in the parks. ▪ Consider applying Sustainable Sites Initiative Guidelines to park’s design and future improvements.
Objective 4: Improve Lower Merion Township’s Parks for environmental sustainability.
Objective 5: Address environmental issues in Lower Merion Township’s parks. ▪ Manage stormwater and enhance water quality through infiltration of runoff. ▪ Continue to plant trees in the park.
The Master Plan for South Ardmore Park seeks to fulfill the goals and objectives of the overriding Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan , while responding to expressed needs and desires of the local community.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 9
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 10
SECTION A BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND DATA
Introduction to the Community Lower Merion Township is located in Montgomery County, in southeastern Pennsylvania. Located in the heart of the "Main Line," the Township is a first ring suburban community bordering the City of Philadelphia. The community is served by commuter rail and bus transit services provided by the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) as well as Amtrak rail passenger service. The nearest major airport, Philadelphia International, is about 30 minutes by car, and can be accessed by SEPTA. Covering an area of 23.64 square miles, the Township is bounded by the City of Philadelphia, the Boroughs of Conshohocken and West Conshohocken, and the Townships of Upper Merion and Whitemarsh in Montgomery County and by the Townships of Haverford and Radnor in Delaware County. Forming the eastern boundary is City Avenue (U.S. 1) separating Lower Merion from the City of Philadelphia. Running along the Township's northern border is the Schuylkill River paralleled by the Schuylkill Expressway (Interstate Route 76), a limited access express highway expediting travel to and from Philadelphia and Philadelphia International Airport and connecting with the Valley Forge interchange of the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Upper Merion Township. Lower Merion Township in Montgomery County
Lower Merion is the largest of the 62 municipalities located within Montgomery County. According to the 2010 Lower Merion Township Community Profile, based upon the 2010 United States Census, the Township population is 57,825, with 24,095 households located within its 23.64 square miles. According to the US Census Bureau, the township has a total area of 23.9 square miles. South Ardmore Park is located between the communities of Ardmore and Wynnewood, both residential suburban community located in the southeastern portion of Lower Merion Township.
Lower Merion Township Park System Lower Merion Township has 44 parks comprising 725 acres of parkland. The parks offer a wide range of recreation opportunities, from active parks that host competitive play and traditional playgrounds to passive parks for enjoying nature and the Township’s scenic beauty. Facilities include ball fields, tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, pavilions, sitting areas, trails, community meeting rooms, a community center, areas for dogs, an indoor gym, a gazebo for performing arts, two swimming pool facilities, a banquet facility, historic sites, community gardens, a wildlife preserve, nature areas, horticultural plantings, and bird sanctuaries.
History of the Park The neighborhood surrounding South Ardmore Park was built in the 1930’s, on land that was formerly the Margaret Green Estate. At this time, the Township acquired the parcels that would become South Ardmore Park.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 11
In 1938, a prominent Landscape Architect was enlisted to design the park. Thomas W. Sears graduated from Harvard in 1906, and soon after moved to the Philadelphia area to start a successful practice, Sears and Wendell. He resided in Gladwyne. In his early career he worked for Olmstead Brothers, famous for New York’s Central Park, which may have had an influence on the beautiful design of South Ardmore Park. In South Ardmore Park, Thomas Sears created a naturalistic landscape around several large play terraces. Most of the park was built as designed, except for an upper pavilion and outer walks, which were never constructed. The park has seen only minor changes from its original design, mostly reflecting the changing preferences for sports, resulting in an elegant, mature park.
1938 Design Plan by Thomas W. Sears, Landscape Architect
1998 South Ardmore Park Master Plan In 1998, the Township prepared the original Master Plan document. Similar to the current plan, this Master Plan was developed through a public participation process that included a steering committee, public meetings, and a period for public to submit comments on the proposed plans.
The following is a summary of the recommendations included in the 1998 report: Vegetation: ▪ Replant the park with large trees to plan for the eventual loss of older trees. ▪ Rejuvenate the understory by planting select number of small flowering trees and shrubs. Structures: ▪ Incorporate the traffic island at Sussex and Athens Avenues into the park and construct a timber arbor to create visual entry into the park.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 12
▪ Construct a pavilion/gazebo as a gathering space. ▪ Develop a coordinated signage plan for the park including park identification, regulatory, and interpretive signage. Walkways: ▪ Provide walking paths throughout the park, including the perimeter. ▪ Provide a concrete chalking area for children next to the play area. Site Furnishings: ▪ Provide game tables between comfort station and proposed pavilion/gazebo. ▪ Improve baseball fields by adding players benches and bleachers, and repairing backstops. ▪ Add picnic tables, benches, bike racks, trash receptacles, and water fountains. ▪ Install irrigation system for athletic fields.
1998 South Ardmore Park Master Plan
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 13
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 14
SECTION B PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The public process regarding the South Ardmore Park Master Plan Update was comprehensive and involved a multi-faceted approach.
1. Study Committee: A Study Committee comprised of Township staff and key community and neighborhood stakeholders met at regular intervals during the design process, at the Lower Merion Township Building.
Study Committee Meetings: March 13, 2013 May 9, 2013 December 4, 2013
Study Committee Site Walk: June 5, 2013
2. Public Meetings: Two public meetings were held at St. Paul’s Evangelical Lutheran Church, located on E. Athens Avenue in Wynnewood, across the street from the park. Township staff advertised the public meetings by posting signs in the park, emailing residents and posting the information on the Township’s website.
First Public Meeting: April 30, 2013
Second Public Meeting: February 18, 2014
Third Public Meeting and Presentation to Parks & Recreation Committee: tbd
3. Neighborhood Survey: Park surveys were mailed to 1,573 residents of Lower Merion within a quarter mile of South Ardmore Park. The survey was also posted on the Township’s website, where residents could print the survey and send to the Township. Approximately 198 surveys were returned for a response rate of eight percent. A copy of the survey, including a summary of the results, is included in the appendix of this report.
4. Web Site: Information concerning the planning process, including meeting dates, the neighborhood survey, sketches and various segments of the master plan were posted on the website for the public to view.
A complete summary of the results of the Public Participation process is included in Section D - Activities and Facilities Analysis.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 15
Aerial Photo of South Ardmore Park
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 16
SECTION C SITE INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS
This section outlines the information gathered and evaluated in order to establish a basis for planning and the proposed use of the site.
General Description of the Site South Ardmore Park is located at 1420 Sussex Road in Wynnewood, PA. The park encompasses almost a complete block—bounded by Sussex Road to the north, E. Spring Avenue on the west, Athens Avenue and Fairston Drive on the east, and residential properties along James Road to the South. The park is zoned R4 (Residence District). The surrounding parcels are all single family homes, also in the R4 Residence District.
Area and Restrictions: Area: South Ardmore Park has a total area of 18.169 acres. In 1937, the Township purchased three separate parcels to create the park.
Original survey plan of the park property .
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 17
Deed: The original deed, dated 1937, contains several deed restrictions, that although may seem out-of-date now, were important enough at the time to preserve the park: “That owners or occupiers of the hereby granted lot or lots of ground shall not at any time hereafter erect, build or use, or cause suffer or permit, to be erected or used said lot or lots any building or part thereof for a drinking saloon, slaughter house, skin dressing establishment, glue, starch or candle manufactory or pig sty and shall not use or permit said premises to be used as a graveyard or for any offensive use or occupation.
Utilities: The comfort station in the park has electric, water, and sanitary sewer service. Water service also extends to the drinking fountains near the comfort station. The perimeter street lighting and few light fixtures in the park are serviced by underground electric. A storm sewer system snakes throughout the park collecting storm water in key areas.
South Ardmore Park – Site Inventory and Analysis Plan
Site Access and Circulation: Site Access: The park does not have perimeter fencing, so one can enter the park on the grass anywhere along E. Spring Avenue, Sussex Road, and Athens Avenue. There are several paved pedestrian access points into the park that connect with the paved paths in the park. Two paths extend to the curb line at the intersection of Sussex Road and Athens Avenue. Also at the intersection of Athens Avenue and Fairston Drive, two paths extend to the curb line. Midway on Athens Avenue, a sidewalk leads toward the comfort station. Midway on Sussex Road, a concrete sidewalk leads from the curb to the playground and comfort station. This entrance is also used by Township maintenance vehicles. Also on Sussex Road, a concrete sidewalk enters the park on the west side of the tennis courts. From the parking area at the southwest corner of the park a concrete sidewalk connect the parking area to the paved path along the James Road residences. Park users have also worn trails in some areas of the park. The major trails are on the park border along both Sussex and Spring Avenues, where a perimeter sidewalk does not exist due to the large street trees. ADA Compliance: Not all of these access points have ADA compliant curb ramps. In Lower Merion Township’s ADA Title II Compliance Audit, a self-evaluation with the goal of providing barrier free access to public facilities, there are several suggestions for South Ardmore Park:
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 18
Priority #1: ▪ Restripe the parking area to include an adequate number of handicap parking spaces with sufficiently wide access aisles. ▪ Provide vertical signage identifying the required handicapped parking spaces and required van accessible space. ▪ Place the handicapped spaces such that they are located on the shortest accessible route of travel to the adjacent pedestrian entrances on E. Spring Avenue. ▪ Where access aisles-to-accessible routes intersect sidewalks, install curb ramps with detectable warnings per current ADA standards. ▪ Provide accessible route from site arrival point to the boundary of each field or area of sports activity.
Priority #2: ▪ Provide program access to the playground area by providing a transfer platform for at least one piece of each type of play equipment to enable wheelchair users to access the equipment. ▪ Use ADA compliant design criteria when designing/installing facilities and site amenities. Install pads at benches that allow for wheelchair user transfer, ensure water fountains are accessible, and ensure that walking paths are ADA compliant.
Circulation Network: Lower Merion Township’s Township-Wide Pedestrian and Bicycle Feasibility Study (2004) maps a comprehensive path, bicycle, and trail system that will link parks, natural areas, and the Schuylkill River with neighborhoods, business districts, schools, and adjacent municipalities. The plan indicates that Spring Avenue, on the western border of the park, is a proposed on-road bicycle route, which connects to the closest major roadway, W. Wynnewood Road, another proposed on-road bicycle route. On these routes, bicycles are meant to “share the road” with automobiles, and no bicycle lanes or markings will be painted on the road. Spring Avenue and W. Wynnewood Road are also part of the proposed Pedestrian Network. Currently, Spring Avenue does not have a paved sidewalk, but W. Wynnewood Road does.
Site Inventory and Analysis South Ardmore Park is a well-used park with a wide range of amenities. This section will itemize the park elements and discuss the park assets and challenges as identified by the public participation process.
Park Assets Character : The park provides a mix of active and passive recreation activities, set in a residential neighborhood. The formal park elements are integrated into a man-made naturalistic landscape. It is a neighborhood park with a community use.
Open Lawn Area and Mature Trees : The Lawn Area provides a large green open space within the developed residential neighborhood. The center of the park is mostly natural grass ball fields, which, when not being played upon, offer a green expanse of lawn. There is an informal lawn area located near the intersection of Sussex Road and Athens Avenue, separated from the fields by the Comfort Station, which offers a quieter, passive experience.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 19
The perimeter of the park, and the central path through the park, is lined with mature shade trees, many original to the park installation. The trees are a variety of species. Throughout the years, new trees have been planted to replace the aging shade trees. The park also contains pockets of ornamental trees and various shrubs, which offer an attractive understory with seasonal interest.
Open space at northeast corner of park.
Paved Paths : In addition to the obvious use of the paths, connecting the various activities in the park, the paved paths are a very popular attraction for walking and jogging. The paths are generally 4’ wide, but vary in size, from as little as 3’ wide to the central path at 6’ wide. The bituminous paths are aging, resulting in cracks and settling.
Walking paths Gathering Spaces :
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 20
The park is used by the neighbors for various events, family gatherings, and picnics. Most of the group activities take place around the Comfort Station, with convenient access to the restrooms, picnic tables, playground, and sports field. Permits are required for group use of picnic areas and ball fields.
Variety of Activities : The list of amenities in South Ardmore Park is impressive: Four baseball/softball fields, three soccer/multi-purpose fields, two basketball courts, five tennis courts, a playground with age appropriate areas, picnic area, and a newly renovated comfort station. Combine this with the other uses—walking, jogging, unstructured play, and gathering spaces—and it is easy to see why the park is a major attraction for both active and passive recreation.
D B
C A
Baseball/Softball Field Key
▪ Field A. This field has a 60’ baseline and no pitcher’s mound, which can be used for Little League baseball or softball. The field has backstops, limited baseline fencing, players’ benches, a batting cage and bleachers. This field, in the lowest area of the site, often remains wet after heavy storm events. ▪ Field B. This field has a 60’ baseline, with a totally skinned infield with no pitcher’s mound, which can be used for Little League baseball or softball. The field has backstops, limited baseline fencing, players’ benches, bleachers, a batting cage, and storage containers. Since Fields A and B have overlapping outfields, Field B, because of its central location and drier conditions, is used more often. ▪ Field C. This field also as a 60’ baseline, which can be used for Little League baseball or softball. The field has a pitcher’s mound, backstops, limited baseline fencing, players’ benches, and bleachers. ▪ Field D. This is the only field with a 90’ baseline, used predominately for high school baseball. This field is very well maintained, with backstops, baseline fencing, players’ benches, bleachers, a batting cage, and storage containers. ▪ Soccer/Multi Purpose Fields. The outfield areas of the baseball fields offer ample space for soccer fields. On the west side of the park, on Fields C & D, two full size soccer fields are striped. On Fields A & B, one smaller field is used when required. All of the fields are natural turf (grass). They are well maintained by the Township, which uses a scheduled plan for aeration, overseeding, fertilization, watering, and infield maintenance.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 21
▪ Tennis Courts. The park has 5 fenced bituminous/color coated tennis courts. There are minor cracks in the paving, but generally the courts are in good condition. ▪ Basketball Courts. There are two bituminous/color coated basketball courts located between Fields A & C. The courts were renovated several years ago, with new backboards and nets, benches, and color coating. There is no fencing around the courts. ▪ Shuffleboard Courts. The two shuffleboard courts, located between Fields B & D, are in poor condition and can no longer be used.
Baseball Field D
Basketball Courts
Tennis Courts
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 22
Playground: The playground is rather large, approximaetely 11,000 sf, separated into two age appropriate areas by a center wood planter. The playground equipment was installed in 1997, and although it is in fair condition, it appears out-of-date compared with some of the modern styles used today. The safety surface is engineered wood mulch. Several benches and picnic tables are located around the perimeter of the play area.
Existing Playground
Comfort Station: The Comfort Station was completely renovated in 2013. The bathrooms were gutted and outfitted with modern ADA compliant fixtures. The outside of the building was repainted, the roof and cupola were replaced, and the brick masonry repointed. This, along with the new sidewalks and landscaping previously installed, now provides an attractive building which is fully ADA compliant.
Comfort Station
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 23
Site Furniture: In addition to the support facilities for the fields and courts, the park also has various amenities located throughout: ▪ Benches. Various styles of wood and metal benches along the paved paths. ▪ Trash Receptacles. Rubber receptacles. ▪ Drinking Fountains. One new fountain is located near the Comfort Station, tennis courts, and playgrounds; the other is located on the path that runs through the center of the park. ▪ Picnic Tables. Various styles of free standing tables located in the lawn area in front of the Comfort Station. Most of these tables are removed and stored in the winter. ▪ Signage. Three park identification signs, the standard wood style, are located at the main entrances into the park. These are accompanied by the park rules regulatory signs. ▪ Lighting. Seventeen pedestrian scale (12’ high) light fixtures are located along the main sidewalks in the park.
Parking: A row of angled parking stalls are located on one side of the park, along E. Spring Avenue. There are approximately 50 parking spaces, with 1 marked for handicapped parking. Currently, the handicapped parking stall does not meet ADA requirements for stall size and access aisles: for 50 parking spaces, 2 handicap stalls are required. Street parking is also available on all of the streets surrounding the park. All parking is located on the house side of the border streets, between the residents’ driveways.
Park Challenges Walking Path – No Perimeter Path: This was a frequent comment in both the surveys and the public meeting. Currently, there is not a paved path adjacent to the roadway along Sussex Road or E. Spring Avenue, due the large mature trees growing along the roadway curb. Walkers and joggers have worn a dirt path on the park side of the trees, which turns muddy after rain events. The bare soil also encourages erosion, exposing tree roots and rocks, creating a tripping hazard.
2008
2013
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 24
Heavy Use of Park: The success and popularity of the park does have a down side. ▪ Lawn areas: The grass areas suffer from too much traffic. The soil gets compacted, the grass wears away, and the bare soil leads to erosion.
▪ Heavy sports use: The popularity of team sports in Lower Merion and a chronic shortage of athletic fields has resulted in the fields being heavily used on weekday afternoons and all day on weekends. Natural turf needs time to rest and recover to perform optimally. The Township provides a comprehensive program to keep the fields in good condition, including aeration, fertilization, overseeding and, when absolutely necessary, closing the fields to play after heavy storm events. ▪ Special events: The size and location of the park make it an obvious choice for special events. Like the sports activities, crowds also cause damage to the lawn areas. Increased trash in the park was also noted. The Township is paying close attention to the groups that apply for permits to use the park, to ensure they will use the park correctly and follow the stated rules. Events which, in the past, have resulted in damage to the park or caused parking and access problems for the neighbors, are being directed to other more appropriate locations.
Typical event in park
▪ Parking and traffic problems: Based upon the lengthy discussions at the public meetings, there appears to be several different, but related, types of parking and traffic problems affecting the surrounding residents:
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 25
- During normal weekend use in the playing season, the fields are generally used all day long. Park users park around the perimeter of the park in both legally and illegally. Some park on the grass, while some pull into private driveways to unload equipment. Some residents have noted that cars often park too close to their driveways, making backing out difficult. - During normal weekday (evening) use in the playing season, the School District uses the fields for practice. The School District brings players (students) in buses to the field, and the buses must stand by to collect the students in case of inclement weather, especially lighting. Some residents have noted that on occasion the buses park on the grass or idle in the street while waiting. - During special events, such as one of the 5K events, the streets around the park are closed to accommodate the runners. Some residents noted that blocking access to their home was inconvenient. Others said that advance notice of the events would be appreciated. - During all heavy use periods, the traffic on the roads around the park increased significantly. Some residents noted that reckless/distracted drivers and speeding drivers are unsafe.
Drainage Problems: The park, generally, is sloped from E. Spring Avenue (high point) to Athens Avenue/Fairston Drive (low point). There are small yard drains along the center path, between the upper fields and the lower fields, that are meant to collect stormwater surface runoff from the upper half of the park. The lowest area of the park, near the intersection of Athens Avenue and Fairson Drive, has large low areas that hold water after large rain events. Some residents who live on James Road, whose yards back up to the park, have noted that stormwater ponds along the park boundary—along their fence lines. Field A, the lowest field near the intersection of Athens Avenue and Fairson Drive, also has seasonal drainage problems, which occasionally restricts play on that field. The Township has beefed up their turf rehabilitiation program on that field in an attempt to alleviate the wet soils.
Occastional flooding in southeast corner of park .
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 26
Site Inventory and Analysis Plan
The Site Inventory & Analysis Plan (see Section E) documents the items noted above. All of these challenges are addressed in the Final Master Plan.
Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PNDI) The Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory Environmental Review Tool (PNDI) is used to perform searches for potential impacts to threatened, endangered, special concern species, and special concern resources. Four agencies have jurisdiction over these resources: ▪ U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service ▪ Pennsylvania Game Commission ▪ Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission ▪ Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources When future projects are in the design phase, a PNDI search will be submitted.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 27
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 28
SECTION D ACTIVITIES AND FACILITIES ANALYSIS This section describes the proposed uses of the site based upon the public participation process, community needs, and the site analysis.
Public Participation – Survey Summary
Purpose: The purpose of the survey was to determine the opinions, ideas and concerns of residents that live in the service area of South Ardmore Park to serve as a foundation for decision-making regarding the park. By understanding resident’s needs and interests, the Township will be better able to direct resources for the benefit of the community.
Process: Township staff and members of the South Ardmore Park Master Plan Study Committee prepared a survey that was mailed to residents that live within a ¼ mile radius of the park. The survey was not mailed to those homes in the ¼ mile service area that are located in Haverford Township. The survey was open-ended to secure as much information from residents as possible. Surveys were distributed to residents using the U.S. Postal Service’s “Every Door” direct mail program in manila colored envelopes lacking the Township’s return address. This could have impacted the responses received. Should this service be used again in the future, greater emphasis will be placed on designing an envelope that will identify the mailing as coming from the Township. Still, surveys were mailed to 1,573 residences in a ¼ mile radius and 198 responses were received for a return rate of eight percent. Typically, direct mail surveys generate a return rate of two to four percent.
Return: Survey respondents lived on all streets within the park’s service area, which, in Lower Merion Township, essentially is bordered by Linwood Ave. to the west, Lancaster Ave. to the north, Remington Rd. to the east and County Line Rd. to the south. The park’s official service are of ¼ mile reaches into Haverford Township. The western end of the park’s service area is bisected by heavily travelled W. Wynnewood Rd., but residents that live on the other side of W. Wynnewood Rd. appear to regularly use the park.
1. Children Of the 198 responses, 102 (52%) of the homes responding have children between the ages of less than 1 year old up to 21 and over. Ages were spread out among respondents.
2. Park Visitation 148 respondents (75%) said that they visit the park daily or weekly. 35 (18%) visit the park monthly or sporadically, while 16 (8%) said they rarely or never visit the park.
3. Other Parks 136 respondents (69%) visit other parks, including Township, non-Township, County, State and Federal parks, colleges and arboretums. The majority of other parks visited were Township parks, however, the most frequently listed park was Haverford Reserve, which is in Haverford Township. This could be because the park’s ¼ mile service area includes part of Haverford Township. Other frequently identified parks included Ashbridge Park, Linwood Park, Narberth Park and Wynnewood Valley Park. The list of parks included a variety of
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 29
active parks with playgrounds and athletic facilities and some passive, natural areas with trails, but the more frequently visited parks were in generally two categories: • Relatively close to South Ardmore Park • Offered a mix of playgrounds and active recreational facilities
Summary of Findings: The survey confirms that South Ardmore Park is an important part of the surrounding neighborhood and it provides clear direction on how to manage and enhance the park to meet the recreational needs and interests of residents. The major survey findings follow:
1. Recreational Pursuits The five most popular recreational activities cited by respondents were: • Walking / running • Playgrounds • Play courts (Tennis & Basketball) • Athletic fields and open space to play • Watching games
2. Park Positives When asked what they liked about South Ardmore Park, the five most popular answers were: • Walking path • Proximity • Playgrounds • Open space and trees • Athletic fields
3. Improvements When asked what they would like to see improved in the park, the five most popular answers were: • Complete the path around the park’s perimeter • Improve bathrooms* • Allow dogs on leash • Plant more trees and shrubs • Upgrade playgrounds / surfacing • Improve maintenance * Bathrooms were closed for renovations at time of survey, but are now open.
4. Amenities at other parks When asked what attracts respondents to other parks in the area, the five most popular answers were: • Open Space • Playgrounds • Walking / hiking paths • Dog walking • Picnic areas
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 30
Description and Prioritization of the Community Needs and Uses for the Site Opportunities and Recommendations Based on a thorough review and evaluation of the mailed surveys, comments from the two public meetings, input from the Study Committee, and discussions with Township Staff, the following list of recommendations has been developed for improvements to South Ardmore Park:
1. Improve the Path System 2. Tree and Vegetation Management. 3. Park Facility Improvements – Playground, Pavilion and Courts 4. Playing Field Management 5. Address the Drainage Problems
Each of the recommendations was given careful consideration:
1. Improve the Path System: The walking paths are a popular attraction in the park. Recommendations for the path system include a range of improvements: ◘ Install paths along Sussex Road and Spring Avenue to create a perimeter path around the outside of the park. The desire to be able to walk around the entire perimeter of the park, without walking in the street, was one of the more frequent comments. Although this is one of the recommendations that was included in the 1998 Master Plan, the paths have not been installed due to the concern about affecting the root system of the existing mature trees, mostly oak trees from 75 to 100 years old, along both Sussex Road and Spring Avenue. The Lower Merion Township Shade Tree Commission was consulted specifically about these trees and expressed strong concern for their declining health due to soil compaction and erosion around the tree canopy, as well as the detrimental effects of cutting tree roots that would be required to install a paved path. It could be argued, however, that if a walking path were installed the large area of compaction around the trees could be avoided, for people would stay on the paths allowing the lawn area to recover. The temporary disturbance of the root system would have to be carefully weighed against the long term benefit. Erosion along Sussex Road
For this recommendation to be implemented, the following steps must be taken: ▪ Carefully select a path location/layout to avoid as many of the existing tree roots and drip lines as possible. Along Sussex Road, the path would have to be as close to the tennis court wall as possible. Along Spring Avenue, several options for a path location were considered, outlined in more detail in Section F, Design Process. ▪ Select a path material that will limit the amount of excavation required.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 31
▪ Begin a tree fertilization program as soon as possible that will prepare the trees for the construction activity. ▪ Develop and implement a long term fertilization/aeration program that will rehabilitate the compacted lawn area next to the new paths, using organic composts. ▪ Continue to work with the Lower Merion Township Shade Tree Commission to balance the desired activities in the park with the preservation of the trees.
◘ Repair or repave the damaged paths / Widen the paths. ▪ Regular inspection and repair or repaving of the paths, to avoid tripping hazards and prevent puddling, is an ongoing necessary maintenance item. ▪ The heavy use of the park and paths warrants a look at making the paths wider. For example, a 6’ wide path would allow for two or three people to comfortably walk next to each other, and also allow for passing. When new paths are installed or replaced, the paths should be made wider where conditions allow. Replacement of all of the paths at one time may be cost prohibitive. This item can be phased based upon the condition of the paths. When a section of path is in disrepair, the path should be replaced at 6’ wide.
◘ ADA Compliance ▪ At all appropriate entrance locations, ADA compliant curb cuts should be installed where the sidewalk meets the roadway curb. ▪ The paths leading from the designated handicapped parking spaces in the Spring Avenue parking area must be ADA compliant. ▪ ADA compliant paths should lead from the main entrances and the parking area to each element in the park. This includes the spectator areas for the baseball/softball fields, the tennis courts, the playground, and the comfort station.
◘ Improve the area where vehicles enter the park. There are occasions where vehicles must enter the park. Park maintenance vehicles enter the park regularly to empty the trash and cut the lawn. Police and park security enter the park when necessary. Occasionally, other vehicles enter to maintain the Comfort Station, remove or prune trees, and whatever. Recognizing this necessity, the entrance off of Sussex Avenue should be improved as follows: ▪ Widen the entrance paving so the vehicle tires do not drive on the lawn. This will prevent vehicles from causing ruts in the lawn and damaging the edges of the paving. Just a small portion of the paving can be made wider. ▪ Selection and design of paving material that can support the weight of the vehicles without cracking or settling. ▪ The entrance should be designed to not look like a vehicle entrance, and not encourage unauthorized vehicles to enter the park.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 32
2. Tree and Vegetation Management: Along with the preservation of the open green space, the preservation of the existing trees is a high priority for the residents. Many of the trees in and around the park are the original trees that were planted when the park was first installed in 1938. This recommendation includes a combination of design and management: ◘ Develop a long-term Master Planting Plan to replace the aging trees. The first step would be an inventory of the exiting trees, including an evaluation of their age, health, and species. The Master Planting Plan would direct tree removals and show locations and species of new tree plantings. To retain the character of the park, the original Thomas Sears planting plan can be considered, recognizing that there are many new tree cultivars that are hardier and less messy than older options. The Shade Tree Commission would be consulted on species selection and planting locations. ▪ Consider returning a portion of the park to a more natural state, perhaps between the James Road properties and the walking trail.
Example of mulched beds
Decline of existing original street trees.
◘ Install new shrubs in easily maintainable mulch beds. Create mulch beds for existing shrubs. For existing and proposed shrub beds, shrubs should be planted in groupings according to their mature size. It is important that plants are spaced so they don’t crowd each other, and conversely so that there are no large spaces between the plants that allow weeds to establish. The beds should have adequate mulch to prevent weed growth and to keep the soil cool and moist for the plants. The edges must be well defined and have smooth curves, so a mower can easily mow around.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 33
Mulch beds do, however, require maintenance. The creation of a neighborhood group and/or neighborhood gardening days, to remove weeds and replenish the mulch, would help to keep the landscaping looking its best.
◘ Develop and implement a maintenance program to keep the existing large trees healthy. In any established landscape with mature trees, the basic management items include: ▪ Remove dead and dying trees. This is mostly a general maintenance item. Removing the trees that have died or are in very poor health is not only a safety issue, but can help to prevent the spread of detrimental disease and insects. ▪ Selective pruning to prolong the life of the trees. This is one step beyond the general maintenance of removing branches after they die. Selective pruning and shaping of older, mature trees can help to extend their life. Tree branches should also be kept clear of the playing fields. ▪ Remove invasive and unwanted species. Invasive species can have a negative effect on the trees and native shrubs that are desired in the park. ▪ Use of organic composts in the tree root zones. Compost tea is an aerobic water solution that has extracted the microbe population and nutrients from the compost. It is a concentrated liquid used to increase the numbers of beneficial organisms applied to the soil. It is typically in a liquid form, but easily spreadable products may also be available. ▪ Develop an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program. Although many think of pests as insects, IPM covers a wide range of organisms (animals, plants, and micro- organisms) that negatively affect the landscape. Generally, IPM uses a variety of control strategies, usually ecologically based, to maintain pests at acceptable levels.
◘ Continue the turf management program to keep up with heavy sports field use. ▪ Follow a regular schedule of aeration, fertilization, and reseeding. ▪ Improve the drainage system to limit overland flow and to prevent flooding. ▪ Investigate the cost/benefits of installing permanent irrigation systems.
◘ Work with the Township’s Environmental Advisory Council and Shade Tree Commission for environmental educational opportunities. Options for learning experiences can include: ▪ The effects of soil compaction around trees. ▪ How to extend the life of large mature trees.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 34
3. Park Facility Improvements: The variety of existing facilities provided in South Ardmore Park are essential in meeting the current demands of the Township. Although more ball fields are needed throughout the township, the park does not have the room for another field. The recommendations below focus on improving the existing facilities in the park, and adding support facilities. ◘ Playground renovation. Evaluation and improvements to all of the playgrounds in the Township is a key component of the Township’s Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan . In South Ardmore Park, recommendations include: ▪ Replace the play structures with more modern equipment. New equipment has been developed that integrates play with skill development, learning, social interaction. New equipment is also designed and manufactured to meet the current safety standards and ADA compliance. ▪ Ensure that the entrances and safety surfaces meet the current safety standards and ADA compliance. ▪ Provide better separation between age groups.
Possible new playground layout
Example of modern playground equipment
◘ Court Repairs: Tennis Courts, Basketball Courts, Shuffleboard ▪ Evaluate the court surfaces for cracks, tripping hazards, and peeling paint. Repairs and resurfacing should be done routinely to prevent bigger problems. ▪ The shuffleboard courts are in disrepair and should be removed.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 35
Existing courts
◘ Install a new picnic pavilion or shade structure. A new pavilion or shade structure can provide multiple benefits—as an informal gathering space, a location for picnics or concerts, or just to get relief from the sun. Two options for locating the structure are: ▪ Placed at the entrance to the playground, the structure is located near the Comfort Station and can double as a shady place for caregivers to watch children in the playground. ▪ Placed in the center of the park, where the shuffleboard courts are currently located, the structure can be larger to accommodate picnic tables for larger gatherings. This would take some of the overuse from the Comfort Station lawn area.
Example of picnic pavilion
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 36
◘ Install a community message board. Many residents noted that they often were unaware of the events scheduled in the park. A message board is one of several means to inform residents of future park events, road closures, etc. A community message board is slated to be installed in the park shortly.
◘ Create Gathering Spaces. ▪ The existing lawn area at the intersection of Sussex Road and Athens Avenue is already used as in informal gathering space. Adding a few groupings of benches and understory ornamental trees can create a more intimate experience in that corner of the park. ▪ A new pavilion or shade structure would provide a more formal gathering space.
4. Playing Field Management: The playing fields have been used by the sports associations in the Township for many years. Increased use of the playing fields requires support and cooperation. ◘ Continue to work with the sports associations to maintain and improve the playing fields. ▪ The Lower Merion School District (LMSD) uses the baseball and softball fields as well as the tennis courts for student practices and games. The LMSD has invested over $80.000 so far improving the fields, for fencing and other items. ▪ The Little League (LMLL) uses the baseball and softball fields. ▪ The Lower Merion Soccer Club (LMSC) uses three fields. The LMSD has requested that team shelters be installed on two fields, Fields B and D, to offer a place for teams to sit out of the elements. The simple shelters, consisting of a fenced area on a concrete pad with a sloped roof, are fairly unobtrusive.
◘ Develop a long term plan for scheduling the use of the fields. The schedule should take into consideration taking fields out of rotation to allow time for the turf to recover.
5. Address the Drainage Issues: The poor drainage in and around the park causes two main issues—the lower field is often closed after heavy rains due to soggy soil and infield erosion, and standing water in the low areas. ◘ Improve the storm drainage system. ▪ Survey and document the existing drainage patterns. Locate areas of concern. Evaluate the condition and capacity of the existing storm inlets and pipes. Repair or
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 37
replace the system as required. Add shallow swales and new inlets in the low areas to alleviate ponding.
Repair and improve existing stormwater drainage system.
◘ Install grass swales and yard drains to collect surface water. The path that separates the upper fields, Fields C and D, from the lower fields, Fields A and B, has a series of small yard drains adjacent to it. Over the years, slight grade changes and settling appears to have decreased the effectiveness of the inlets. ▪ Install a grass swale adjacent to the path to collect surface runoff before it drains onto the lower fields. Replace and repair the broken inlet grates. Adjust the inlet elevations to collect the maximum amount of water.
Example of grassed drainage swale
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 38
SECTION E DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
There are many aspects to a successful master plan. This section reviews some of the design considerations that were applicable to forming the recommendations for South Ardmore Park.
Site Limitations Although the recommendations for South Ardmore Park focus generally on improvements to the existing uses, there are minor site limitations which were considered: ▪ Space limitations: Access to and within a park should be safe and convenient for the users. When considering the addition of new facilities, such as a ball field, providing adequate support space around the facility is necessary. ▪ Location of mature trees: When the park was originally landscaped in 1938, street trees were planted around the perimeter of the park, but sidewalks were not installed. The now mature trees, and their fragile root zone, must be recognized. ▪ Proximity to adjacent houses: The park is totally surrounded by residential houses. Some uses, which generate larger crowds and noise, should ideally be located as far away as possible from the perimeter of the park.
Applicable Standards and Guidelines The proposed improvements to the Park will reference: ▪ “2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design”, published by the Department of Justice, for access into and around the park, including sidewalks and curb ramps. ▪ The Handbook for Public Playground Safety, for selection and layout of new playground equipment and playground safety surfacing. ▪ The National Federation of State High School Association’s Court and Field Guide, for layout and design of sports facilities. ▪ ASTM Standards for the fencing surrounding the playgrounds.
▪ “Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual”, published by the PA Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management, for sediment and erosion control and stormwater management items.
▪ Applicable Codes and Ordinances of Lower Merion Township.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 39
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 40
SECTION F DESIGN PROCESS
The creation of the Final Master Plan involved several steps:
▪ The Study Committee first met on March 19, 2013 to review the overall master planning process, the schedule, and the best way to include the residents in the design process. ▪ Township Staff, with input from the Study Committee, developed the questionnaire that was mailed to the residents. ▪ An Existing Conditions Plan was made for the park, including property lines, topography, flood plains, vegetation, the stream and bridge, and other existing site features.
▪ The Study Committee met on May 9, 2013, to prepare for the first Public Meeting. Preliminary survey results were discussed, as well as the agenda for the meeting.
▪ The Study Committee also met at South Ardmore Park on June 5 to walk the site and discuss the positive/negative aspects of the park. Several residents joined the walk and discussion. ▪ The first Public Meeting was held on April 30. Billed as a Public Workshop, the purpose of this meeting was to gather as much information as possible about the current uses of the park, the challenges and needs, desired improvements, and other observations. The attendees were broken into three groups and asked to review and discus three key questions: What do you like about Merion Botanical Park? How do you use the park? and What would you like to see improved in the park? A multitude of responses were provided in writing by each group, and
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 41
also discussed by everyone table by table. These responses were the basis of the Site Inventory and Analysis Plan as well as the Preliminary Master Plan.
▪ The third Study Committee Meeting was held on December 4, 2014. The purpose of this meeting was to review the Preliminary Master Plan in advance of the second Public Meeting.
▪ The second Public Meeting was held on February 18, 2014. At this meeting, a power point presentation was given summarizing the design process up to date and outlining each of the recommendations.
▪ The final Public Meeting, and presentation to the Lower Merion Parks & Recreation Committee, will be held in early 2015. If the Board approves and adopts the Final Master Plan, the report will be finalized and distributed.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 42
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 43
Design Alternatives At the second public meeting, several design options / alternatives were presented for discussion:
Perimeter path location / layout. The creation of a perimeter path around the entire park is a much desired improvement. Along Spring Avenue, where there is a row of angled parking stalls, there is no space between the existing curb line and existing trees to install a path.
Existing conditions.
Two options were discussed for how to install a path in this location:
1. Change angled parking to parallel parking. Since parallel parking takes less space than angled, 11 feet could be gained next to the curb line, allowing enough room for a 6’ wide paved path and clear area around the existing trees. This would result in a net loss of 22 parking spaces.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 44
2. Install the path on the field side of the trees. Angled parking would remain, but the path would be installed in the root zone of the trees. During soccer season, the path would also interfere with the spectator areas around the fields.
After much discussion, the group present remained undecided on the best way to proceed.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 45
Location for Picnic Pavilion or Shade Structure
Two styles of structures were presented, and two potential locations were discussed for the location of either a picnic pavilion or a shade structure:
Again, after discussion, no definitive selections were made.
Options for picnic pavilions and shade structures.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 46
SECTION G DESIGN COST ESTIMATES
This section provides very general Overall Magnitude of Probable Construction Costs for each of the recommendations. These estimated costs are based on Conceptual Plans and will be used for budgeting purposes. Construction costs can vary widely based upon the economy, the construction climate, and the type of work. As each item gets implemented and detailed plans are developed, the construction costs can be refined.
A Master Plan is a guide for long range improvements to the Park. Improvements will be done in phases as funds become available. For each of the items, we have included a priority rating based upon many factors, including: ▪ Improve the health, safety, and welfare of the public. ▪ Deter/Correct negative impacts to the environment. ▪ Provide needed amenities. ▪ Eliminate maintenance problems / Simplify maintenance. The priority levels may be adjusted over time as the needs of the community change and due to other unforeseen conditions that may affect the park. The Township also actively seeks grant money from various organizations, which may modify the schedule of improvements.
The Township of Lower Merion has a Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which is a written document that provides direction and guidance to carefully plan and manage its budget and assets. It is a five-year plan, updated annually, that identifies capital projects, budgets and funding sources, and scheduling of major public physical improvements. Based upon the priority rating, the South Ardmore Park improvements will be entered into the CIP.
South Ardmore Park Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
1. IMPROVE THE PATH SYSTEM a. INSTALL PATH ALONG SUSSEX ROAD Priority Level: A Implement tree fertilization program (1 year ahead) $500.00 Contractor Mobilization $5,900.00 Bituminous paths $33,600.00 Retaining wall improvements $10,000.00 Drainage $10,000.00 ADA compliant curb ramp at corner $3,000.00 Restore lawn areas $2,250.00 Construction Contingency $11,800.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $13,000.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $7,700.00 TOTAL: $97,750.00
b. INSTALL PATH ALONG SPRING AVENUE Priority Level: A Option 1: Located on park side of trees: Implement tree fertilization program (1 year ahead) $500.00 Contractor Mobilization $3,500.00 Bituminous paths $30,000.00 ADA compliant curb ramp at corner $3,000.00
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 47
Restore lawn areas $2,100.00 Construction Contingency $7,000.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $7,800.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $3,900.00 TOTAL Option 1: $57,800.00
b. INSTALL PATH ALONG SPRING AVENUE Priority Level: A Option 2: Located on street side of trees, alter parking: Implement tree fertilization program (1 year ahead) $500.00 Contractor Mobilization $18,000.00 Sawcuts and removals $36,400.00 Depressed granite curb and roadway restoration $102,000.00 Striping and signage $3,000.00 Bituminous paths $30,000.00 ADA compliant curb ramp at corner $3,000.00 Backfill and topsoil $4,500.00 Restore lawn areas $2,100.00 Construction Contingency $36,200.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $39,800.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $19,900.00 TOTAL Option 2: $295,400.00
c. REPAIR, REPAVE, AND WIDEN ALL PATHS Priority Level: C (This work can be phased based upon need) Contractor Mobilization $15,000.00 Repair and overly 6’ wide paths $7,000.00 Remove narrow paths and replace with 6’ wide paths $135,000.00 Restore lawn areas $7,500.00 Construction Contingency $30,000.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $33,000.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $16,500.00 TOTAL: $244,000.00
d. ADA COMPLIANCE Priority Level: A Seven new curb cuts at entrances to park. Contractor Mobilization $2,000.00 Remove existing ramps and curbs $3,500.00 Depressed granite curb and roadway restoration $12,600.00 Concrete sidewalk ramps $3,000.00 Truncated domes $700.00 Restore lawn areas $100.00 Construction Contingency $4,000.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $4,400.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $2,100.00 TOTAL: $32,400.00
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 48
e. ADA COMPLIANCE Priority Level: B Paved paths to all elements in park. Contractor Mobilization $1,500.00 4’ wide bituminous paths $14,400.00 Restore lawn areas $700.00 Construction Contingency $3,000.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $3,400.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $1,700.00 TOTAL: $24,700.00
f. IMPROVE VEHICLE ENTRANCE Priority Level: A Contractor Mobilization $1,500.00 Remove existing paving and curbs $1,200.00 Depressed granite curb and roadway restoration $3,000.00 Concrete sidewalk $2,000.00 Concrete pervious pavers $6,000.00 Truncated domes $1,200.00 Bollards $1,000.00 Signage $600.00 Restore lawn areas $200.00 Construction Contingency $3,000.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $3,400.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $1,700.00 TOTAL: $24,800.00
2. TREE AND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT a. DEVELOP LONG TERM MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN Priority Level: A Design and Engineering: Site Inventory & Landscape Master Plan $5,000.00 TOTAL: $5,000.00
b. CREATE MULCHED BEDS AROUND SHRUBS Priority Level: C Contractor Mobilization $2,000.00 Weed $2,500.00 Pruning and selective removals $2,000.00 Fabric and mulch $5,000.00 Replacement shrub plantings $10,000.00 Construction Contingency $3,900.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $4,300.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $2,200.00 TOTAL: $31,900.00
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 49
c. IMPLEMENT A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR LARGE TREES Priority Level: B Contractor Mobilization $4,900.00 Remove dead and dying trees $10,000.00 Selective pruning $10,000.00 Remove invasive species $5,000.00 Install missing shade and street trees $21,600.00 Integrated Pest Management $2,000.00 Construction Contingency $9,700.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $5,000.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $5,400.00 TOTAL: $73,600.00
d. CONTINUE TURF MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Priority Level: A On sports fields – 2x per year on all four fields Contractor Mobilization $700.00 Mechanical aeration $1,600.00 Herbicide application $2,000.00 Reseeding bare areas and overseeding $1,600.00 Fertilization $2,000.00 Construction Contingency $1,400.00 Design and Engineering: Design, Construction Docs $1,600.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $800.00 TOTAL: $11,700.00
e. WORK WITH EAC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION Priority Level: A Ongoing communication during all phases of project TOTAL: $0.00
3. PARK FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS a. PLAYGROUND RENOVATION Priority Level: B Contractor Mobilization $31,000.00 Remove existing equipment $5,000.00 Remove trees, planters, and fencing $7,700.00 New play structures $150,000.00 Installation of play structures $70,000.00 ADA compliant surfacing $18,000.00 Underdrainage $10,000.00 Perimeter fencing and age separation $33,000.00 Benches and tables $10,800.00 Pre-fabricated shade structure $7,000.00 Signage $1,500.00 Landscaping $3,000.00 Construction Contingency $47,500.00
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 50
Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $70,000.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $35,000.00 TOTAL: $499,500.00
b. COURT REPAIRS Priority Level: C 5 Tennis Courts, 2 Basketball Courts, 2 Shuffleboard Courts Contractor Mobilization $10,000.00 Tennis courts – repair cracks $12,000.00 Tennis courts – wearing course $36,000.00 Tennis courts – colored surfacing $36,000.00 Tennis courts – new nets (salvage posts) $1,500.00 Basketball courts – repair cracks $4,000.00 Basketball courts – colored surfacing $8,500.00 Shuffleboard courts - remove $2,400.00 Backfill and topsoil $800.00 Lawn restoration $3,000.00 Construction Contingency $20,300.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $22,300.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $11,100.00 TOTAL: $167,900.00
c. NEW PICNIC PAVILION or SHADE STRUCTURE Priority Level: C Steel pavilion, 50’ x 30’ Contractor Mobilization $10,600.00 Earthwork $5,000.00 Concrete foundation and pad $10,000.00 Pavilion $80,000.00 Picnic tables $5,000.00 Path to pavilion $2,500.00 Lawn Restoration $3,000.00 Construction Contingency $21,100.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $23,300.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $11,600.00 TOTAL: $172,100.00
d. CREATE GATHERING SPACES Priority Level: C Three areas adjacent to existing paths Contractor Mobilization $1,800.00 Benches $9,000.00 Concrete foundations and pads $3,000.00 Ornamental trees $6,000.00 Lawn Restoration $300.00 Construction Contingency $3,700.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $4,000.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $2,000.00 TOTAL: $29,800.00
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 51
4. PLAYING FIELD MANAGEMENT
a. CONTINUE TO WORK WITH SPORTS ASSOCIATIONS Priority Level: A b. DEVELOP LONG TERM PLAN FOR SCHEDULING FIELD USE TOTAL: $0.00
5. ADDRESS THE DRAINAGE ISSUES IMPROVE THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Priority Level: A Contractor Mobilization $8,900.00 Erosion control and tree protection $28,000.00 Excavation and grading $22,000.00 Large inlets and manholes $12,000.00 Park inlets $7,500.00 Existing inlet repair / new grates $5,000.00 HDPE pipe $2,000.00 Landscaping $5,000.00 Lawn seed $7,000.00 Construction Contingency $17,700.00 Design and Engineering: Survey, Design, Construction Docs $19,500.00 Construction Administration, Construction Observation $9,800.00 TOTAL: $144,400.00
SUB TOTAL – PRIORITY LEVEL A: $373,850.00 to $611,450.00
SUB TOTAL – PRIORITY LEVEL B: $597,800.00
SUB TOTAL – PRIORITY LEVEL C: $645,700.00 ______
GRAND TOTAL – ALL IMPROVEMENTS: $1,617,350.00 to $1,854,950.00
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 52
SECTION H APPENDIX
1. Mailed Survey – Questionnaire 2. Mailed Survey – Survey Summary 3. Meeting Memoranda – Study Committee Meetings and Public Meetings
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 53
South Ardmore Park Survey
In 2013 the Township will update the master plan for South Ardmore Park. The goal of the master plan is to provide a guide for appropriate park uses and a long-range vision for future development and programming. South Ardmore is considered an active, developed park and it is arguably the most heavily used park in the Township. It has become a popular location for fundraisers, tournaments and small road races and Lower Merion High School uses the park for its baseball, softball and tennis programs, but in its heart it remains a neighborhood park. There may be upgrades or improvements that residents would like to see that could improve the park’s natural environment or provide facilities that respond to the evolving recreational and leisure interests of our residents. Securing input from those who live near the park, care about it and use it is an integral part of the process. Please take a few minutes of your time to answer the questions below.
1. On which street do you live?
2. Does your household include children? Yes _____ No _____
If Yes , what are their ages?
3. How often does your household visit South Ardmore Park?
Daily ____ Weekly _____ Monthly _____ Sporadically _____ Rarely ____ Never _____
3a. If Daily or Weekly, please indicate why:
3b. If Rarely or never, please indicate why:
4. When at the park, what facilities do you use?
Basketball Courts Tennis Courts
Ages 3 – 5 Tot Lot Ages 5 – 12 Playground
Softball / Baseball Fields Multi-Purpose Fields
Walking path Picnic Area
5. What do you like about South Ardmore Park?
5. What would you like to see improved in South Ardmore Park, in order of priority?
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 54
6. Does your household visit other parks? Yes _____ No _____
If Yes , please indicate which parks:
7. What attracts you to parks in other areas?
Playgrounds _____ Picnic areas _____ Youth sports _____ Basketball _____ Trails
Tennis _____ Open space _____ Dog walking _____ Other:
8. What types of improvements would you like to see made in the park, in order of priority?
Additional comments:
Once completed, please fax to: (610) 645-4777 ; email to: [email protected] or return to the address below by March ____, 2013 . Should you have any questions or wish to discuss South Ardmore Park in further detail, please call the Department of Parks and Recreation at (610) 645-6220.
Township of Lower Merion Department of Parks & Recreation 75 E. Lancaster Ave. Ardmore, PA 19003-2323 Attn: South Ardmore Park Survey
If you would like to be kept up to date on the master planning process via email, please print your name and email address clearly:
Thank you for your time!
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 55
SOUTH ARDMORE PARK MASTER PLAN SURVEY REPORT
Purpose:
The purpose of the survey was to determine the opinions, ideas and concerns of residents that live in the service area of South Ardmore Park to serve as a foundation for decision-making regarding the park. By understanding resident’s needs and interests, the Township will be better able to direct resources for the benefit of the community.
Process:
Township staff and members of the South Ardmore Park Master Plan Study Committee prepared a survey that was mailed to residents that live within a ¼ mile radius of the park. The survey was not mailed those homes in the ¼ mile service area that are located in Haverford Township. The survey was open-ended to secure as much information from residents as possible. Surveys were distributed to residents using the U.S. Postal Service’s “Every Door” direct mail program in manila colored envelopes lacking the Township’s return address. This could have impacted the responses received. Should this service be used again in the future, greater emphasis will be placed on designing an envelope that will identify the mailing as coming from the Township. Still, surveys were mailed to 1,573 residences in a ¼ mile radius and 198 responses were received for a return rate of eight percent. Typically, direct mail surveys generate a return rate of two to four percent.
Return:
Survey respondents lived on all streets within the park’s service area, which, in Lower Merion Township, essentially is bordered by Linwood Ave. to the west, Lancaster Ave. to the north, Remington Rd. to the east and County Line Rd. to the south. The park’s official service are of ¼ mile reaches into Haverford Township. The western end of the park’s service area is bisected by heavily travelled W. Wynnewood Rd., but residents that live on the other side of W. Wynnewood Rd. appear to regularly use the park.
1. Children
Of the 198 responses, 102 (52%) of the homes responding have children between the ages of less than 1 year old up to 21 and over. Ages were spread out among respondents.
2. Park Visitation
148 respondents (75%) said that they visit the park daily or weekly. 35 (18%) visit the park monthly or sporadically, while 16 (8%) said they rarely or never visit the park.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 56
3. Other Parks
136 respondents (69%) visit other parks, including Township, non-Township, County, State and Federal parks, colleges and arboretums. The majority of other parks visited were Township parks, however, the most frequently listed park was Haverford Reserve, which is in Haverford Township. This could be because the park’s ¼ mile service area includes part of Haverford Township. Other frequently identified parks included Ashbridge Park, Linwood Park, Narberth Park and Wynnewood Valley Park. The list of parks included a variety of active parks with playgrounds and athletic facilities and some passive, natural areas with trails, but the more frequently visited parks were in generally two categories:
• Relatively close to South Ardmore Park • Offered a mix of playgrounds and active recreational facilities
Summary of Findings:
The survey confirms that South Ardmore Park is an important part of the surrounding neighborhood and it provides clear direction on how to manage and enhance the park to meet the recreational needs and interests of residents. The major survey findings follow:
1. Recreational Pursuits
The five most popular recreational activities cited by respondents were: • Walking / running • Playgrounds • Play courts (Tennis & Basketball) • Athletic fields and open space to play • Watching games
2. Park Positives
When asked what they liked about South Ardmore Park, the five most popular answers were: • Walking path • Proximity • Playgrounds • Open space and trees • Athletic fields
3. Improvements
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 57
When asked what they would like to see improved in the park, the five most popular answers were:
• Complete the path around the park’s perimeter • Improve bathrooms* • Allow dogs on leash • Plant more trees and shrubs • Upgrade playgrounds / surfacing • Improve maintenance
* Bathrooms were closed for renovations and are now open
4. Amenities at other parks
When asked what attracts respondents to other parks in the area, the five most popular answers were: • Open Space • Playgrounds • Walking / hiking paths • Dog walking • Picnic areas
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 58
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 59 M E E T I N G M E M O R A N D U M
PROJECT: South Ardmore Park Master Plan
SUBJECT: Study Committee Meeting #1
DATE: March 13, 2013
LOCATION: Board Room
ATTENDEES: Jane Dellheim, Board of Commissioners, Ward 8 Commissioner Lindsay Taylor, Director, Parks & Recreation Dave DeAngelis, Parks Supervisor Donna Heller, Recreation Supervisor Kate Galer, President, LMT Environmental Advisory Council Bob Schultz, Operations Foreman, Lower Merion School District Marc Eisman, Lower Merion Little League Biff Sturla, Lower Merion Soccer Club Diana Mancini, Office of the Township Engineer
The following is a summary of the items discussed at the first Study Committee Meeting held at 8:30 am in the Lower Merion Township Board Room.
An agenda, list of study committee invitees, Master Plan project scope outline, project calendar, and draft of the survey was distributed to all attendees.
1. Lindsay Taylor and Commissioner Jane Dellheim gave a brief welcome and introduction. 2. Lindsay gave an overview of the master planning process. The process includes: A. Collection of background information and data B. Review of current plans and reports related to the park (and deed restrictions) C. Summary of the public participation process D. Collection of site information and site analysis E. Activities and facilities analysis F. Design considerations G. Design process H. Design cost estimate I. Maintenance and operating costs. 3. Lindsay noted that SAP is the most popular park in the Township. It hosts many activities and events, including the Little League, Alex’s Lemonade events, running events, and group picnics. 4. An ADA audit was done for the park.
5. The 1999 Master Plan for SAP concluded that neighbors basically wanted the park to remain the same. Other than maintenance improvements, not many changes have been made to the park since then. 6. Biff commented on soccer needs: more “small sided” fields, as many as possible. 7. Marc commented on Little League needs: they have big dreams, including evening games (lighted fields), concession, and fences. Not having field fences has been a major problem, as compared to Harriton’s field, with fences and a scoreboard. 8. Donna noted that overuse of the fields has been a general concern. 9. Bob commented on the School District needs: The School District has used SAP for baseball and tennis for over 20 years. The School District has helped with materials, sod, regrading, backstops, etc. to help maintain the fields. Team shelters and a storage area is needed. They have designs for the shelters that they will share. 10. Dave gave his comments on the use of the park: Heavy sports use makes it very hard to get a good stand of grass. An irrigation system should be considered for the future. Fields are severely compacted. There are many walkers (seniors) who use the park. Walkers have compressed the soil under the mature trees. Paths are old and not graded well. Many should be replaced. The drainage system is old and it is unclear if it is working correctly. System should be documented and tested. Drainage problems should be addressed. People use the buffer plantings as a place to urinate when Comfort Station is closed. Consider portable toilets in the off-season (at upper fields). 11. Kate said that SAP is a prime location for the introduction of rain gardens to aid in stormwater management. Perhaps a pervious paving material could be used in lieu of bituminous paths. Additional plantings should also be considered. 12. Lindsay pointed out that many people who use the park are not from the neighborhood, so neighbors are reluctant to participate in upkeep. Jane noted that the Civic Associations don’t get involved unless there is a specific issue. Lindsay wants groups to get involved in the park from the onset so they stay interested. Dave noted that the walkers seem to pick up fallen branches and sticks. Biff said that after Sunday games they have a person who cleans up trash around the fields. 13. Lindsay outlined how the Master Plan will follow the DCNR process, for future funding grants. 14. A survey is being developed to be mailed to residents within a ¼ mile radius of the Park, plus associations. Lindsay asked that all Study Committee members review the survey and provide comments. The survey will be mailed shortly, and also posted on the Township’s website. 15. Biff and Marc talked about the dog problem. The park does not allow dogs. As a condition of getting a permit, soccer and Little League must police their own spectators (if they bring a dog). 16. Biff noted that there are trees in conflict with the fields. Pruning is recommended. Area around fields should be kept in mind when planning new plantings. People will recycle if the bins are there. If not, it goes in the trash. The Township found that recycling pickup is a huge financial burden, in terms of labor and time. The Township is looking into whether a special recycling truck can make it feasible. 17. Dave noted another problem with people blowing their leaves onto park property for the Township to pick up, as well as dumping residential trash in the trash cans.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 61
18. Discussion of Project Scope, Timeline, and Budget The Project Calendar, attached, includes the following meetings: ▪ First Study Committee Meeting in March ▪ Public Meeting #1 in April ▪ Site Analysis and Public Participation Input Evaluation April thru July ▪ Second Study Committee Meeting in May. ▪ Development of Alternative Designs August and September ▪ Third Study Committee Meeting in September. ▪ Development of Draft Master Plan September to October ▪ Second Public Meeting in October ▪ Development of Final Master Plan October to November ▪ Fifth Study Committee Meeting, Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting, and Public Meeting #3 in December. 19. A site visit will be scheduled to tour the Park as a group. 20. One last thing: Lindsay noted that the existing vehicle entrance is worn out and damaging the sidewalk. A new vehicle access location should be investigated.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 62
(Insert agenda)
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 63
M E E T I N G M E M O R A N D U M
PROJECT: South Ardmore Park Master Plan
SUBJECT: Study Committee Meeting #2
DATE: May 9, 2013
LOCATION: Board Room
ATTENDEES: Scott Zelov, Board of Commissioners, P&R Committee Chair Jane Dellheim, Board of Commissioners, Ward 8 Commissioner Lindsay Taylor, Director, Parks & Recreation Dave DeAngelis, Parks Supervisor Donna Heller, Recreation Supervisor Bob Schultz, Operations Foreman, Lower Merion School District Don Walsh, LMHS Athletic Director, Lower Merion School District Diana Mancini, Office of the Township Engineer
The following is a summary of the items discussed at the second Study Committee Meeting held at 8:30 am in the Lower Merion Township Board Room.
An agenda was distributed to all attendees.
1. Lindsay Taylor said there has been a great return rate on the surveys that were mailed. They are in the process of compiling and sorting the information received. All respondents got emails about the Public Meeting. Emerging themes from survey so far: Concern of increased activity level, especially concerning fund raiser events, little league tournaments growing, want to walk dogs around perimeter of park. 2. Lindsay is preparing a spreadsheet of permits issued for the park. 3. Public Meeting #1 will be held at St. Paul’s Lutheran Church on Monday, May13 at 7:00 pm. Diana showed the plan, prepared from GIS data, that can be used in the group input portion of the Public Meeting. 4. Lindsay gave an update on the Comfort Station renovation project. The project is almost complete. Scott asked if the bathrooms can be opened as soon as possible. They can be opened as soon as Dave and Lindsay do a walk through and approve the work. 5. Lindsay reviewed how the public meeting will proceed (separate agenda). 6. Ideally, we will follow up with public meeting #2 in September. There will be another study committee meeting before the next public meeting. 7. Bob said that the School District is in a position to proceed with the team shelters. They will be concrete pads with open fencing and roof, just like at Harriton HS. They will install on Fields B and D. They would like to do the work over the summer. The fence work has already been completed— replacing fabric on fields B and D. The estimated cost of improvements is $83,000.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 64
8. Don said they are looking for places to park buses while waiting for students. They would prefer if they were not idling next to the park. 9. Bob asked to consider changing field C back to 90’ baseline. 10. The dog issue was again discussed. Dogs in the park are not compatible with lawns and playing field use. 11. Jane Dellheim said that park security has two people per shift, that usually check on the comfort station and do general observation. 12. Dave reminded us that the vehicle access area must be addressed. They are getting complaints about the dirt and tire marks.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 65
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 66
M E E T I N G M E M O R A N D U M
PROJECT: South Ardmore Park Master Plan
SUBJECT: Public Workshop #1
DATE: May 13, 2013
LOCATION: St. Paul’s Lutheran Church, Ardmore
ATTENDANCE: See attached attendance sheet
The following is a summary of the items discussed at the first Public Workshop Meeting held at 7:00 pm at St. Paul’s Lutheran Church.
1. Commissioner Scott Zelov gave a brief welcome. 2. Lindsay Taylor introduced the attending members of the Study Committee. 3. Lindsay explained the Master Planning process and the purpose and importance of the Public Workshop. The survey information is being compiled, and the emerging themes are the completion of the path around the park, dogs (pro and con), the level of activity in the park, and 4. Diana Mancini (Office of the Township Engineer) briefly outlined how the Master Plan document would be developed. 4. The attendees were asked to work as a group at each table where they were seated. They were provided a plan of South Ardmore Park for reference, and given a list of questions to discuss and respond to. The groups’ written responses are attached. 3. Lindsay asked a representative from each table to give a brief summary of what they felt were the most important issues. The following is a summary of the comments: Table 1: SAP was once a nice, quiet park. Now it is insanity—buses, cars, no room to walk, no parking. No police presence (for last six months). Reduce speed on roads to 15 mph. There are parties in the park with loud speakers. Two with petting zoos (crazy). The lawn is in bad shape from overuse.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 67
Table 2: Ditto table 1 on the overuse of park. Weekend parking is very difficult. Hard to pull out of driveways. Was once a very family oriented park. Now so much activity and people outside of neighborhood. Not friendly on weekends. Heard ‘team shelters’ were proposed. Against structures, like natural beauty of park. Better enforcement of codes: ice cream truck parks in travel lane. Intense use of park, trash left by ‘mongol hordes’, No consideration for the park, let alone neighbors. The running races prevent neighbors from going to their own homes (closed roads).
Table 3: Like open spaces, natural beauty, nice gathering space for families, and the different activities offered. Agree with others regarding overuse of park. Should be a family/neighborhood park. Seems like it is for everybody but residents. There should be a community board to announce events/dated. Perhaps allocate down time, just for neighbors. Parking is a BIG issue, especially on weekends. There is nowhere for anybody to go. High School is using the field, and let the buses park on the grass. At an event last weekend – tour buses showed up. A lot of trash is left after events. Install lighting for safety (not for play). Minimal levels. Same comment on race events closing the streets.
Table 4: Prefer not to have lights. Like the open spaces, pastoral beauty, variety of activities, and pathways. Would also like a community board to announce events. Dog walking should be allowed. Keep dogs on leash and be respectful. Against recent police enforcement of no dogs in the park. Allow leashed dogs on perimeter. Don’t want sports complex and constant play. Concern about outside events—size of groups, buses, and trash Do not like the races that close street. What about a linear race that ends somewhere else? Why not use other neighborhoods for these events. Enforce parking during events.
Table 5: Like green space and plantings. But plantings not kept up. Do not want lights. Complete sidewalks—wide enough for double strollers. Want dogs and bikes in the park. Allot certain times for bikes?
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 68
What about widening E. Athens Ave for drop-off? Want more leisure space, places to sit, benches. Add a structure for shade or expand shaded area at comfort station. Upkeep of lawn areas and grass. Community Notice Board Don’t agree that dogs should be allowed in the park. There are a lot of issues with dogs and irresponsible dog owners.
Table 6: Finish path around park, especially on Sussex where it is muddy and uneven. Allow dogs on leash throughout the park. Happy with planting and trees. Okay with level of activity, but neighbors have to avoid the park on weekends. Add more trash receptacles and recycling bins, especially by comfort station and bleachers. Allow bicycles on paths. Perhaps just single speed bikes or for kids 8 and under? Replace drinking fountains. Consider a fenced in dog park behind the comfort station.
Table 7: Love diversity of uses. Like renovated comfort station, especially for groups. Continue walking path around park. Add netting between softball field and basketball court for safety. E. Athens is very narrow for parking Races are inconvenient. Linear races are a good idea. Preference is for no lights in park.
Table 8: Like variety of uses, tennis, paths. Kids on bikes should be allowed. No lights. The park is overused, but okay with responsible users. Continue path around park. Better picnic tables. Consider dogs on leash around perimeter. Parking on roads is very tough. Sound ordinances: can hear games and crowds blocks away. No loud speakers. Board for event notices. Agree with overuse—should restrict group sizes.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 69
Table 9: Continue path around park. Don’t mind dogs around perimeter of park, but would need baggies and trash cans. Where did all of the trash cans go? Add recycling bins. Police the ‘nocturnal activities’ going on in the park Can we lower the speed limits around the park? Or make E. Athens one way? Limit ice cream truck music.
Table 10: Same thoughts as other tables. Expand and upgrade the playground. A lot of families use the park. Continue the path around the park. Dogs should be allowed around the perimeter, on leash. Add trash cans and baggies. Event notice board. Improve or remove the triangular traffic island. Perhaps volunteers can plant. Add drinking fountains, benches. Add exercise stations around perimeter path.
4. The next Public meeting will be in the fall, where the Conceptual Master Plan Alternatives will be presented.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 70
(insert attendance sheet)
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 71
M E E T I N G M E M O R A N D U M
PROJECT: South Ardmore Park Master Plan
SUBJECT: Study Committee Site Walk
DATE: June 5, 2013
LOCATION: South Ardmore Park
ATTENDEES: Scott Zelov, Board of Commissioners, P&R Committee Chair Jane Dellheim, Board of Commissioners, Ward 8 Commissioner Lindsay Taylor, Director, Parks & Recreation Dave DeAngelis, Parks Supervisor Donna Heller, Recreation Supervisor Kate Galer, President, LMT Environmental Advisory Council Bob Schultz, Operations Foreman, Lower Merion School District Don Walsh, LMHS Athletic Director, Lower Merion School District Diana Mancini, Office of the Township Engineer Several neighbors
Some members of the Study Committee met at South Ardmore Park for an informal group tour. The following items were noted while walking through the Park:
1. Lindsay said the predominant themes of the preliminary survey results are to complete the walking path around the park, allow dogs in the park on the perimeter paths, and to improve the playground. 2. Lindsay noted that the existing vehicular access is not in good shape. Vehicles kill the grass and compact and rut the soil. Dave said that the location is fine, but it is just not wide enough. 3. The group discussed the pros and cons of bituminous paving vs. permeable pavers or grass pavers. Pavers tend to require continuous maintenance. Grass pavers are successful only if irrigated. 4. There is a dirt trail under the mature trees along Sussex Road. A path has never been installed because of the fear of harming the mature trees. Options should be investigated. 5. Playground equipment will eventually be replaced. This is a very popular playground. 6. Various inlets are visible throughout the park, but they are old and some are collapsing. The entire storm sewer system should be surveyed and inspected. 7. Include drainage improvements for Field A, to avoid the current delays after rain. 8. The School District wants to improve the fields for their use. Team shelters are desired, but not popular with the neighbors. Pros of shelters: shelter from bad weather and lightning; cons of shelters: neighbors think that it will turn the park into a sports complex. The School District has already added some fencing and bought new bleachers. Portable scoreboards are also proposed. 9. Site furniture should be accessible and ADA compliant. Add more benches, bike racks, and recycling containers.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 72
10. A “gathering space” was suggested in the Comprehensive Plan. Consider a covered space for picnics and gatherings. Maybe near playground. 11. Shuffleboard can come out. Not used. 12. Field D: Infield has been renovated. School District wants shelters here. 13. Township has received many requests for more drinking fountains. Can use one near circle. 14. School District proposing two team shelters. Will also need electricity for scoreboard (portable scoreboard needs to recharge). 15. Continue perimeter path along Spring Avenue. Location will have to work with parking, spectator area, and existing mature trees. 16. Make sure we plant trees for succession. Need new trees to replace dying trees. 17. Field A: School District does not want shelters here. Dave has improved fields by aeration, seeding, lots of infield mix, raising mound height, and turf amendments. This has helped the drainage situation, but not totally. This would be a good candidate for field underdrainage. Rain Gardens uphill of field may also help. (Drainage improvements are in this years CIP) 18. Long term solution: swap basketball court and field A backstop location. Will help drainage and provide proper field orientation.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 73
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 74
M E E T I N G M E M O R A N D U M
PROJECT: South Ardmore Park Master Plan
SUBJECT: Study Committee Meeting #3
DATE: December 4, 2013
LOCATION: Caucus Room
ATTENDEES: Scott Zelov, Board of Commissioners, P&R Committee Chair Jane Dellheim, Board of Commissioners, Ward 8 Commissioner Lindsay Taylor, Director, Parks & Recreation Dave DeAngelis, Parks Supervisor Kate Galer, President, LMT Environmental Advisory Council Bob Schultz, Operations Foreman, Lower Merion School District Peg Schofield, Lower Merion Shade Tree Commission Diana Mancini, Office of the Township Engineer
The following is a summary of the items discussed at the second Study Committee Meeting held at 8:30 am in the Lower Merion Township Caucus Room.
An agenda was distributed to all attendees.
1. Lindsay passed out an outline Document & Plan Review (attached): ▪ A summary report of how South Ardmore Park fits into the 2012 Lower Merion Comprehensive Recreation, Parks, and Open Space Plan. ▪ The 2012 ADA Title II Compliance Audit ▪ The 2004 Open Space and Environmental Resource Protection Plan Update ▪ The 2003 Bicycle & Pedestrian Network Plan ▪ The 1998 South Ardmore Park Master Plan ▪ The 1996 Natural Areas Study ▪ Miscellaneous Plans and Drawings (Park plans by Thomas Sears done in 1938) Kate will check the EAC Plan for goals that include S Ardmore Park. 2. Lindsay also distributed a Survey Report summarizing the results of the survey. The Survey Report and the raw data of the survey responses are attached also.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 75
3. Diana reviewed the status of the Existing Conditions Plan. The plan includes all of the information that the DCNR requires for future grant application submissions. 4. Diana reviewed the park’s assets and challenges. The group added that the park’s assets should emphasize the large mature trees, the playground, and using the space for gathering and parties. 5. Diana reviewed the outline of items that will be included on the Preliminary Master Plan. The purpose of this exercise is for the Study Committee to agree on what items are to be presented at the Public Meeting for inclusion in the Master Plan. (The draft outline was not distributed, but is attached to avoid replication). The following items were discussed: ▪ Improve the path system and ADA Compliance. - Many residents would like to continue the path to form a loop around the park (perimeter path). The path is missing along Sussex Road and Spring Avenue. - The path has not been installed previously because there are very large mature trees along the curb line. Peg Schofield, a member of the Lower Merion Township Shade Commission, kindly attended the meeting to share her thoughts on the possibilities of installing some kind of path (material not yet determined) under the trees. Peg explained that the compaction is not good for the trees, and she explained one way to rehabilitate the soil under the tree using organic composts to return the biology of the soil. There was much discussion on the tradeoff between short term root disturbance from path installation vs. long term benefits to the tree by lessening the compaction around the trees if people stayed on a new path. - Along Sussex Road, the intent would be to install the path as close to the tennis courts as possible. - Along Spring Avenue, there is very little room between the tree trunk and the curb line (where people walk now). Diana will investigate the possibility of moving the curb to allow for a sidewalk to be installed. The size of the parking stalls and the width of the road must be considered. - Kate noted that there is no sidewalk on Spring Avenue, to connect the park to W. Wynnewood Road, a popular route to the park. (post meeting note: Diana checked the Township Wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Master Plan Map, and Spring Ave is noted as a pedestrian route on existing sidewalks. But there are no existing sidewalks.) Kate also noted that this light is very short, and may not allow time for ped crossing. Lindsay asked if Brian Keaveney could provide input. ▪ Tree and Vegetation Management - Kate noted that the measures to save the mature trees, like the organic compost treatments, how to avoid compaction, etc., may be able to link in to schools to use as a teaching tool. - The Shade Tree Committee submitted a letter outlining their thoughts on how to best save the mature trees. Among the recommendations was the suggestion to install a mulched tree ring around each tree. Mulched rings require much manpower from the Township to keep in place, replenish, and keep weed free. The involvement of neighbors to help take care of the trees was suggested. (Currently, this park does not have a “Friends of the Park” group.) ▪ Address the Drainage Issues (no further comments) ▪ Playing Fields - The LMSD was holding off on installing the team shelters until after the Master Plan was complete. The team shelters are a requirement for the schools so players have a place to go in the event of lightning. Once the shelters are in, school buses will not have to wait on site. - The LMSD had previously requested that Field C be switched from a 60’ baseline to a 90’ baseline. The Township is considering converting the field to a more flexible field—a skinned infield with a 70’ baseline, depending upon the success of the other Township fields (Bala Park) that have been converted.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 76
▪ Park Facility Improvements - Lindsay noted that a community message board has already been ordered, and will be installed near the comfort station. ▪ Park Rules and Other Policy Issues - Diana included these because they will most likely come up at the Public Meeting, even though they are not specifically items to be included in the Master Plan. - Many residents requested that dog walking be allowed in the park, especially on the perimeter paths. Scott noted that there was much thought and discussion by the Board previously to set the current policy, which is that no dogs are allowed in active parks, and dogs on leash are allowed in passive parks. To change the rules in S Ardmore Park should involve another look by the Board for all parks. Until the perimeter path is installed, it is a moot point. ▪ More Site Furniture - The question about recycling came up again. Dave noted that the signs recently installed, about leaving your footprints, not your plastic bottles, seem to be working. 6. The Public Meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 17 th at St. Paul’s Lutheran Church in Ardmore. Diana will present a power point presentation similar the other park Master Plan presentations. Lindsay is expecting a good turnout.
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 77
South Ardmore Park Master Plan page 78