DOCSLIB.ORG

Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012270 9/24/2021 0145 CONNOLLY JAMES MICHAEL W M 24 HUNTINGTON BEACH POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 2021012268 9/24/2021 0055 CAVALIERI MICHAEL ALAN W M 28 THOUSAND OAKS POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 2021012263 9/23/2021 2339 STEFANY FREDERICK NELSON W M 55 HUNTINGTON BEACH DISORDERLY CONDUCT:ALCOHOL 2021012262 9/23/2021 2259 ALCANTAR CARLOS ARMANDO H M 29 HUNTINGTON BEACH POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE FOR SALE 2021012261 9/23/2021 2245 OLIPHANT ALLEN LEE W M 41 FOUNTAIN VALLEY TRANSPORT/ETC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE 2021012260 9/23/2021 2226 GARCIA LUIS ALBERTO H M 32 SANTA ANA POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES WITHOUT A PRESCRIPTIO DRIVE WHILE LICENSE SUSPENDED/REVOKED DRIVE WHILE LICENSE SUSPENDED/REVOKED DRIVE WHILE LICENSE SUSPENDED/REVOKED Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 1 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012259 9/23/2021 2220 CAMARENA CHRISTOPHER JAMES W M 35 ANAHEIM POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA ENTER/ETC NONCOMMERCIAL DWELLING POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 2021012250 9/23/2021 1858 LUDLOW WILLIAM DERUSHE W M 56 HUNTINGTON BEACH BURGLARY VANDALISM ($400 OR MORE) 2021012246 9/23/2021 1743 HILL JOSHUA EARL W M 41 MORENO VALLEY TAKE VEHICLE W/O OWNER CONSENT/VEHICLE THEFT 2021012245 9/23/2021 1735 WINGARD WILLIAM ERNEST W M 59 HUNTINGTON BEACH INDECENT EXPOSURE PARKS; CURFEW - RESTRICTED HOURS VANDALISM:DEFACE PROPERTY 2021012233 9/23/2021 1346 PRICE KATHLEEN ANN W F 59 POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 2021012230 9/23/2021 1310 DEYOUNG CAMERON TAYLOR H M 32 HUNTINGTON BEACH OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 2 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012223 9/23/2021 1120 LERETTE JEFFREY W M 25 WESTMINSTER POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 2021012222 9/23/2021 1111 HAMILTON ALEXANDER JOHN W M 27 WESTMINSTER POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. VIOLATION OF PROBATION FELONY 2021012224 9/23/2021 1110 SANDOVALRAMI MIGUEL ANGEL H M 40 FULLERTON VIOLATE PROTECTIVE ORDER:DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:W/PRIOR CONTEMPT OF COURT:VIOLATE PROTECTIVE ORDER/ETC 2021012221 9/23/2021 1012 WILLIAMS QUENTIN RAY W M 24 CAMERON BEACH; CONSUME,SELL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 2021012219 9/23/2021 0957 HAWLEY ROBERT EUGENE W M 64 HUNTINGTON BEACH POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. POSSESS SHOPPING/LAUNDRY CART DISORDERLY CONDUCT: LODGE WITHOUT CONSENT UNLAWFUL STORAGE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY IN PUBLIC PLAC UNLAWFUL CAMPING IN PUBLIC PLACES UNLAWFUL STORAGE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY IN PUBLIC PLAC Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 3 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012214 9/23/2021 0836 FIELDS STUART W M 52 DISORDERLY CONDUCT:ALCOHOL DRINKING IN PUBLIC PLACE 2021012213 9/23/2021 0835 CHAPMAN CHRISTOPHER SCOTT W M 30 HUNTINGTON BEACH PETTY THEFT - SHOPLIFTING 2021012211 9/23/2021 0600 VANALSTINE ZACHARY JAMES W M 31 HUNTINGTON BEACH POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA POSSESS NARCOTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. APPROPRIATE LOST PROPERTY 2021012210 9/23/2021 0440 FILIPOWICZ ANDREW EDWARD W M 23 HUNTINGTON BEACH BEACH CURFEW, 10 PM TO 5 AM 2021012210 9/23/2021 0440 DELUNA MICHAEL LEONARD W M 62 SANTA ANA BEACH CURFEW, 10 PM TO 5 AM OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR 2021012209 9/23/2021 0435 NARANJO MIGUEL ANGEL H M 23 LAGUNA BEACH BEACH CURFEW, 10 PM TO 5 AM Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 4 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012204 9/23/2021 0010 LUSKER WILBER P O M 29 CHARLOTTE DISORDERLY CONDUCT:ALCOHOL 2021012202 9/22/2021 2315 RANDALL SHANE TRAVIS W M 33 GARDEN GROVE COMMERCE/TRANSFER/POSSESS METAL KNUCKLES POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. 2021012199 9/22/2021 2227 HORTA MARCO ANTONIO H M 45 SAN PEDRO POSSESS NARCOTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 2021012198 9/22/2021 2205 HENDERY LEON B M 32 NORWALK TRESPASS:OBSTRUCT/ETC BUSINESS OPERATIONS/ETC 2021012164 9/22/2021 1543 RAMOS ADRIAN H M 21 HUNTINGTON BEACH BURGLARY -COMMERCIAL 2021012178 9/22/2021 1505 TERRILL STEVEN GREGORY W M 40 FOUNTAIN VALLEY POSSESS PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFO WITH INTENT TO DEFRA ACQUIRE ACCESS CARD WITHOUT CONSENT W/INTENT TO SELL/ POSSESS NARCOTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE FALSE IDENTIFICATION TO SPECIFIC PEACE OFFICERS Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 5 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012177 9/22/2021 1437 TREJO RONALD W M 69 LA MIRADA DISORDERLY CONDUCT:ALCOHOL 2021012165 9/22/2021 1026 CURRAN RICHARD PAUL W M 29 HUNTINGTON BEACH USE/UNDER INFLUENCE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE FALSE IDENTIFICATION TO SPECIFIC PEACE OFFICERS 2021012158 9/22/2021 0758 WHITE MICHAEL ANTHONY W M 34 FOUNTAIN VALLEY ROBBERY TAMPER WITH VEHICLE 2021012154 9/22/2021 0247 BRYANT ISAAC W M 20 HUNTINGTON BEACH DUI ALCOHOL DUI ALCOHOL/0.08 PERCENT 2021012152 9/22/2021 0148 WHITE MICHAEL ANTHONY W M 34 FOUNTAIN VALLEY POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. 2021012151 9/22/2021 0139 MENESES STEPHANIE ANNETE H F 23 HUNTINGTON BEACH INFLICT CORPORAL INJURY ON SPOUSE/COHABITANT ELDER/DEPENDENT ADULT CRUELTY Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 6 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012150 9/21/2021 2335 PATTERSON JOSEPH ANDREW W M 32 COSTA MESA POSSESS NARCOTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE BENCH WARRANT FELONY 2021012148 9/21/2021 2324 VINCENT RUSSELL DAVID W M 38 WHITTIER ROBBERY OUTSIDE WARRANT FELONY 2021012135 9/21/2021 2145 STEWART KENNETH THOMAS W M 24 HUNTINGTON BEACH VIOLATE COURT ORDER TO PREVENT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 2021012142 9/21/2021 2110 SHAFER JOSEPH MANUEL H M 45 CORONA TAKE VEHICLE WITHOUT OWNER CONSENT 2021012134 9/21/2021 1721 HEMBERGER MICHAEL EDWARD W M 58 HUNTINGTON BEACH RECKLESS DRIVING; HIGHWAY Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 7 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012129 9/21/2021 1518 SHEARMAN OWEN SCOTT W M 22 WINDBER VANDALISM:DEFACE PROPERTY POSSESS NARCOTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE W/O PRESCRIPTION POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA FALSE IDENTIFICATION TO SPECIFIC PEACE OFFICERS 2021011865 9/21/2021 1355 POLK ANDREW TAYLOR B M 20 BUENA PARK ROBBERY:SECOND DEGREE OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR OUTSIDE WARRANT FELONY OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR OUTSIDE WARRANT FELONY OUTSIDE WARRANT FELONY OUTSIDE WARRANT FELONY 2021012119 9/21/2021 1223 HASTINGS SPENCER TRAVIS W M 22 COSTA MESA FALSE IDENTIFICATION TO SPECIFIC PEACE OFFICERS OUTSIDE WARRANT FELONY OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 8 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012118 9/21/2021 1210 DONIA ROBERT JAMES W M 50 LONG BEACH BURGLARY -RESIDENTIAL TAMPER WITH VEHICLE 2021012113 9/21/2021 1130 JOY KYLE PATRICK W M 25 HUNTINGTON BEACH POSSESS NARCOTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE BENCH WARRANT MISDEMEANOR 2021012112 9/21/2021 1114 JONES STEPHANIE ANN W F 65 HUNTINGTON BEACH OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR 2021012105 9/21/2021 0855 MEEKER JEFFREY DERIC W M 49 HUNTINGTON BEACH POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. 2021012093 9/21/2021 0645 GONZALEZ HECTOR ALCANTAR H M 46 ANAHEIM OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR OUTSIDE WARRANT MISDEMEANOR Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 9 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012093 9/21/2021 0637 OGLE BRIAN DAVID W M 54 HUNTINGTON BEACH POSSESS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - MISD. POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA BENCH WARRANT MISDEMEANOR BENCH WARRANT MISDEMEANOR BENCH WARRANT MISDEMEANOR 2021012092 9/21/2021 0605 LEWIS MICHAEL WAYNE W M 38 TULSA INFLICT CORPORAL INJURY ON SPOUSE/COHABITANT POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA POSSESS NARCOTIC CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE TAMPERING W/WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE 2021012090 9/21/2021 0330 SILVA HAILEY LYNN W F 21 HUNTINGTON BEACH DISORDERLY CONDUCT:ALCOHOL 2021012091 9/21/2021 0323 DOBSON DAMIAN JOSEPH W M 29 LONG BEACH POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 2021012090 9/21/2021 0315 MUNOZMELEND GUSTAVO H M 33 COSTA MESA DUI ALCOHOL DRIVING WITHOUT LICENSE HIT AND RUN -FAIL TO NOTIFY OWNER Friday, September 24, 2021 Page 10 of 77 Huntington Beach Police Department - Adult Arrest Log Case ID Date Time Last First Middle Race Sex Age Residence 2021012089 9/21/2021 0156 DONIA ROBERT JAMES W M 50 LONG BEACH USE/UNDER INFLUENCE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE 2021012088 9/21/2021 0053 ANDERSON JONATHON JASON JAM H M 22 FALSE IDENTIFICATION TO SPECIFIC PEACE OFFICERS OUTSIDE WARRANT FELONY BEACH CURFEW, 10 PM TO 5 AM 2021012087 9/21/2021 0036 CORNN CHRISTOPHER JAMES W M 38 POSSESSION OF NARCOTIC PARAPHERNALIA 2021012085 9/20/2021 2347 CABRERA ALEXIS JOSHUE H M 23 COSTA MESA PETTY THEFT - MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS RECEIVE/ETC KNOWN STOLEN PROPERTY 2021012084 9/20/2021 2215 CORTAZAR BERNARDO H M 29 HUNTINGTON BEACH DISORDERLY CONDUCT:ALCOHOL DRINKING IN PUBLIC PLACE 2021012076 9/20/2021
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hamilton County Criminal Court 9/29/2021 Page No: 1 Trial Docket Trial Date: 09/29/2021 Division: 1 Judge: STEELMAN, BARRY A
    CJUSHAND Hamilton County Criminal Court 9/29/2021 Page No: 1 Trial Docket Trial Date: 09/29/2021 Division: 1 Judge: STEELMAN, BARRY A. State vs. ATKINS , DEDRIC LAMONT aka ATKINS, DEDRICK Silverdale AGGRAVATED ARSON Counts: 1 Thru 1 TCA: 39140302 TIBRS: VANDALISM Counts: 2 Thru 2 TCA: 39140408 TIBRS: 290 Docket #: 310525 Bond Amt: $0.00 Attorney: PERRY, JAY (P.D.) District Attorney: ORTWEIN, FREDERICK LEE Bonding Co.: Order of Court: Active Bond Date: NVC PP Number Times: Case Type: Indictment Filing Date: 9/30/2020 Number of Trial Docket Appearances: 8 Amount Owed on this Case: $0.00 Total Amounts Owed: $765.00 7/21/2021 - PASSED SEPTEMBER 29 2021 FOR SETTLEMENT #1 6/23/2021 - FORMAL ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT BE REFERRED TO THE MIDDLE TENNESSEE MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE, FSP FOR FORENSIC EVALUATION. THE PREVIOUS ORDER REGARDING MOCCASIN BEND HEALTH INSTITURE IS HEREBY RESCINDED. #1 6/22/2021 - FORMAL ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT BE REFERRED TO THE MOCCASIN BEND HEALTH INSTITURE FOR A MAXIMUM OF 30 DAYS FOR FORENSIC EVALUATION. #1 5/26/2021 - ORAL MOTION FOR FORENSIC EVALUATION HEARD AND SUSTAINED - PASSED JULY 21, 2021 FOR SETTLEMENT #1 5/26/2021 - FORMAL ORDER ENTERED DIRECTING FORENSIC EVALUATION #1 State vs. ATKINS , DEDRIC LAMONT aka ATKINS, DEDRICK Silverdale DOMESTIC AGGRAVATED ASSAULT Counts: 1 Thru 1 TCA: 39130102 TIBRS: 13A Docket #: 310526 Bond Amt: $0.00 Attorney: PERRY, JAY (P.D.) District Attorney: Bonding Co.: Order of Court: Active Bond Date: NVC PP Number Times: Case Type: Indictment Filing Date: 9/30/2020 Number of Trial Docket Appearances: 8 Amount Owed on this Case: $0.00 Total Amounts Owed: $765.00 7/21/2021 - PASSED SEPTEMBER 29 2021 FOR SETTLEMENT #1 6/23/2021 - FORMAL ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT BE REFERRED TO THE MIDDLE TENNESSEE MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE, FSP FOR FORENSIC EVALUATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Telegraph
    THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2020 Kitchen & Bath Top Five Newspaper Remodeling CNPA California Journalism Awards Painting THE FOLSOM Cabinets Counters Flooring Remodeling Jobs completed before April 1, 2020 * only while openings last * not to be combined with any other offer Your community news by a dam site since 1856 Serving the communities of Folsom and El Dorado Hills 916.774.6416 www.PerrymanPainting.com FOLSOMTELEGRAPH.COM Lic # 948889 (C33 & B) Exoneration, new arrest in 1985 EDH murder case BY BILL SULLIVAN The 1985 case went “This is the first case in occurred on July 7, 1985. OF THE FOLSOM TELEGRAPH unsolved for 14 years before California and only the For all these years, investigators said DNA second in this country Davis has been behind Since his conviction, evidence and an incrim- where investigative genetic bars awaiting retrial, for Ricky Davis continued inating statement by a genealogy has not only led a crime he didn’t commit. to plead his innocence resident of the home tied to the freeing on an individ- El Dorado Superior Court in an El Dorado Hills Davis to the slaying back in ual from prison for a crime Judge Kenneth Mele- murder that took place 35 November of 1999. He was he did not commit, but the kian ended that when he years ago. Last Thursday, then sentenced in 2005 to identification of the true threw out his second-de- 54-year-old Davis walked 16 years-to-life, accused of source,” said Sacramento gree murder conviction in out of El Dorado County stabbing Hylton 29 times County District Attorney the emotional court hear- Superior Court a free man in what was described as a Anne Marie Schubert.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Is No Excuse for Suspicionless Searches of Electronic Devices at the Border by Blaine H
    COVID-19 Is No Excuse for Suspicionless Searches of Electronic Devices at the Border By Blaine H. Evanson, Daniel R. Adler, and William F. Cole June 19, 2020 The coronavirus is not in your phone. Why travelers’ electronic devices without a warrant should it be used to justify border searches? supported by probable cause, or even without reasonablesuspicion that the traveler has been For the last four years, the U.S. border has exposed to COVID-19 or has violated related been a flashpoint for bitter public policy public health measures. disputes over immigration, the character of the country’s sovereignty, and the nature Such a breathtaking claim of unbounded and extent of constitutionally guaranteed investigatory authority would hardly be civil liberties. Many of these border- unprecedented for CBP. To the contrary, related disputes have receded from public it would be of a piece with CBP’s policy of consciousness as a result of 2020’s trifecta conducting suspicionless searches of electronic Blaine H. Evanson Partner of a presidential impeachment, a global devices—CBP already conducts tens of health pandemic, and racial tension over thousands of such searches every year. And policing. Yet as the country begins to emerge CBP would not be the only law enforcement from COVID-19 lockdowns, America’s agency to sift through digital data in an effort international borders are likely to resurface to trace the spread of COVID-19. State and as a key battleground for civil libertarians local law enforcement authorities have been and law enforcement officials. The cause? trawling through social media posts to arrest The “border search exception,” a little- travelers for violations of social distancing known loophole to the Fourth Amendment’s orders.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDE for ARREST, JAIL TIME/DETENTION, TRIAL/HEARING, and SENTENCING STAGES (Guide 1 of 3)
    Guide for Families Experiencing the Criminal Justice System GUIDE FOR ARREST, JAIL TIME/DETENTION, TRIAL/HEARING, AND SENTENCING STAGES (Guide 1 of 3) HTTP://WWW.YOUTH.GOV/COIP Families have unique needs and challenges when a parent is arrested. When this happens, family FAMILIES WILL TALK TO MANY members—including the children—are affected. PEOPLE DURING THESE FOUR This guide is the first in a series of three guides STAGES: that cover a family’s journey as the family goes through the stages of, and copes with, a loved • Lawyer or public defender one’s involvement in the justice system. • Judge and court personnel This guide covers the first four stages in the • Probation officer typical criminal justice process, and the other • Law enforcement two guides cover incarceration and reentry: • Jail or detention facility staff • Arrest (entry into the system) • Jail or detention case worker • Jail Time/Detention (prosecution • Child welfare (in some cases) and pretrial services) • Hearing/Trial (adjudication) Families can use the worksheet on the last page of this guide to keep track of • Sentencing (before incarceration) important names, phone numbers, and • Incarceration (Guide 2) e-mail addresses. • Reentry (Guide 3) This guide starts with descriptions and definitions guide. The questions are designed to help of the stages to help families understand the families and caregivers anticipate and respond to legal terms and processes. Having a better thoughts and concerns their children may have. understanding may help families feel less The tips offer suggestions to help caregivers overwhelmed. It may also help families know support and care for the children of parents who what to expect and what will happen next.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: Pre-Trial Detention
    Detention Monitoring Tool Factsheet Pre-trial detention Addressing risk factors to prevent torture and ill-treatment ‘Long periods of pre-trial custody contribute to overcrowding in prisons, exacerbating the existing problems as regards conditions and relations between the detainees and staff; they also add to the burden on the courts. From the standpoint of preventing ill-treatment, this raises serious concerns for a system already showing signs of stress.’ (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture)1 1. Definition and context 2. What are the main standards? Remand prisoners are detained during criminal Because of its severe and often irreversible negative investigations and pending trial. Pre-trial detention is effects, international law requires that pre-trial not a sanction, but a measure to safeguard a criminal detention should be the exception rather than the procedure. rule. At any one time, an estimated 3.2 million people are Pre-trial detention is only legitimate where there is a behind bars awaiting trial, accounting for 30 per cent reasonable suspicion of the person having committed of the total prison population worldwide. They are the offence, and where detention is necessary and legally presumed innocent until proven guilty but may proportionate to prevent them from absconding, be held in conditions that are worse than those for committing another offence, or interfering with the convicted prisoners and sometimes for years on end. course of justice during pending procedures. This means that pre-trial detention is not legitimate where Pre-trial detention undermines the chance of a fair these objectives can be achieved through other, less trial and the presumption of innocence.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunters and the Hunted: Rights and Liabilities of Bailbondsmen Michael Goldstein
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 6 | Number 2 Article 6 1978 Hunters and the Hunted: Rights and Liabilities of Bailbondsmen Michael Goldstein Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Accounting Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Goldstein, Hunters and the Hunted: Rights and Liabilities of Bailbondsmen, 6 Fordham Urb. L.J. 333 (1978). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol6/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HUNTERS AND THE HUNTED: RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES OF BAILBONDSMEN I. Introduction For over 150 years bailbondsmen have had the right to arrest their principals' whenever and wherever they chose, and to recommit them to government custody in order to avoid forfeiture of their bond.2 This right was upheld when a bailbondsman forcibly entered his principal's home in the middle of the night,3 when the bondsman pursued his principal beyond state lines4 and even when the bonds- man used physical force in the act of apprehension.5 This Note will examine the development of this extrajudicial power to make arrests, the manner in which it is handled in the 1. Read v. Case, 4 Conn. 166 (1822); Nicolls v. Ingersoll, 7 Johns. (N.Y.) 145 (1810). 2. In this area of the law, the principal is the party who has been arrested and is seeking release from prison pending his scheduled court appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. V. Angel Rivero
    Jul 7, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cYffiKVS DIST°CTE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA I s.D. OF FLA -MJ^Ml 17-204J5.GR-COOKE/GOODMAN 18 U.S.C. § 1960(a) 18 U.S.C. § 2 18 U.S.C. § 982 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. ANGEL RIVERO, Defendant. / INFORMATION The Acting United States Attorney charges that: 1. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1960(b)(2), the term "money transmitting" included transferring funds on behalf of the public by any and all means, including but not limited to, transfers within this country or to locations abroad by wire, check, draft, facsimile, or courier. 2. At all times relevant to this Information, money transmitters operating in the State of Florida were required to register under Florida law. 3. At no time relevant to this Information did defendant ANGEL RIVERO register with the State of Florida or obtain a license from the State of Florida to operate a money transmitting business. 4. At no time relevant to this Information did defendant ANGEL RIVERO comply with money transmitting business registration requirements pursuant to Title 31, United States Code, Section 5330. Case l:17-cr-20475-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2017 Page 2 of 6 UNLICENSED MONEY TRANSMITTER (18 U.S.C. § 1960) From on or about May 22, 2014, through on or about March 11, 2015, in Miami-Dade County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, ANGEL RIVERO, did knowingly conduct, control, manage, supervise, direct, and own all or part of an unlicensed money transmitting business, as that
    [Show full text]
  • Bail Bond Division
    OMCCA Bail Bonds Oklahoma Insurance Department May 17, 2016 1 Bail Bondsman License Requirements • At least Twenty-One (21) years of age • US Citizen • High School diploma or equivalent • Good character and reputation • No felony or certain misdemeanor convictions 2 Bail Bondsman Education Requirements • Pre-Licensing Education – 16 hours • Continuing Education – 8 hours annually • The Oklahoma Bondsman Association provides the PLE and CE 3 Lines of Authority (LoA) • 578 licensed bail bondsmen • Cash (83) • Professional (60) • Property Bail (2) • Surety Bail (549) • Multi-County Agent (25) As of 04-05-2016 4 Reporting Requirements • Bail bondsmen are required to electronically submit a report each month • Reports include appearance bonds written and discharged for reporting month • Bail bondsmen pay a reviewal fee to Department which is $2.00 per every $1,000 in appearance bonds written 5 2015 • Professional & MCA bail bondsmen appearance bonds written = $365,209,998.92 • Insurance companies appearance bonds written = $152,949,604.70 • Cash appearance bonds written = $1,088,721.74 • Property appearance bonds written = $120,000.00 6 Bail Bond Division Staff - • Communicate with bail bondsmen, court clerks, sheriffs, judges, and the public providing assistance and education concerning bail bonds • Review approximately 630 reports each month for accuracy • Review Court Clerk reports to ensure bail bondsmen report all appearance bonds 7 Bail Bond Division Staff - • Review and process approximately 65 new licenses each year and 369 license renewals in 2015 (biennially per birth month) • Recommend statute and rule changes to Department’s legislative staff • Testify at administrative hearings • Investigate complaints against bail bondsmen 8 Types of Complaints • BBF – Notice of Non Payment of Bond Forfeitures received from Court Clerks • BBI – Complaints from Consumers, Court Clerks, Sheriffs, & bail bondsmen • BBD – Bail Bond Division referrals to Legal Division 9 Complaints & Disciplinary Actions • Non Payment of Forfeiture notice (BBF).
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Trial Detention Addressing Risk Factors to Prevent Torture and Ill-Treatment
    Detention Monitoring Tool Second edition FACTSHEET Pre-trial detention Addressing risk factors to prevent torture and ill-treatment ‘Long periods of pre-trial custody contribute to overcrowding in prisons, exacerbating the existing problems as regards conditions and relations between the detainees and staff; they also add to the burden on the courts. From the standpoint of preventing ill-treatment, this raises serious concerns for a system already showing signs of stress.’ (UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture)1 1. Definition and context 2. What are the main standards? Remand prisoners are detained during criminal Because of its severe and often irreversible negative investigations and pending trial. Pre-trial detention is effects, international law requires that pre-trial detention not a sanction, but a measure to safeguard a criminal should be the exception rather than the rule. procedure. Pre-trial detention is only legitimate where there is a At any one time, an estimated 3.2 million people are reasonable suspicion of the person having committed behind bars awaiting trial, accounting for 30 per cent of the offence, and where detention is necessary and the total prison population worldwide. In some countries, proportionate to prevent them from absconding, pre-trial detainees reportedly constitute the majority of committing another offence, or interfering with the course the prison population, and in some settings even over of justice during pending procedures. This means that 90 per cent of detainees.2 They are legally presumed pre-trial detention is not legitimate where these objectives innocent until proven guilty but may be held in conditions can be achieved through other, less intrusive measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia
    (not official copy) CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA GENERAL PART Section One : GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1. LEGISLATION ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Article 1. Legislation Governing Criminal Proceedings Article 2. Objectives of the Criminal-Procedure Legislation Article 3. Territory of Effect of the Criminal-procedure Law Article 4. Effect of the Criminal-Procedure Law in the Course of Time Article 5. Peculiarities in the Effect of the Criminal-Procedure Law Article 6. Definitions of the Basic Notions Used in the Criminal-procedure Code CHAPTER 2. PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Article 7. Legitimacy Article 8. Equality of All Before the Law Article 9. Respect for the Rights, Freedoms and Dignity of an Individual Article 10. Ensuring the Right to Legal Assistance Article 11. Immunity of Person Article 12. Immunity of Residence Article 13. Security of Property Article 14. Confidentiality of Correspondence, Telephone Conversations, Mail, Telegraph and Other Communications Article 15. Language of Criminal Proceedings Article 16. Public Trial Article 17. Fair Trial Article 18. Presumption of Innocence Article 19. The Right to Defense of the Suspect and the Accused and Guarantees for this Right Article 20. Privilege Against Self-Incrimination (not official copy) Article 21. Inadmissibility of Repeated Conviction and Criminal Prosecution for the Same Crime Article 22. Rehabilitation of the Rights of the Persons who suffered from Judicial Mistakes Article 23. Adversarial System of Criminal Proceedings Article 24. Administration of Justice Exclusively by the Court Article 25. Independent Assessment of Evidence CHAPTER 3. CONDUCT OF CRIMINAL CASE Article 26. Conduct of Criminal Case Article 27. The Obligation to institute a criminal case and resolution of the crime Article 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Angel Qualifications
    Angel Qualifications QUALIFICATIONS Reliable, non-judgmental, and compassionate individual. Ability to stay calm under pressure or in difficult situations is a necessity. Willingness to assist with additional tasks, as needed. Angels must sign all applicable Hope Not Handcuffs paperwork, including confidentiality and liability release waiver forms. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ALL ANGELS • Attendance at new mandatory Angel training (2-2 ½ hours). • At least 21 years of age • Valid Driver’s License/State ID (Please bring to training) • Submit to Criminal History Background Check (same background check as used to attend school field trips). • Reliable contact information (phone and email). • Commit to (1) six-hour “on-call” shift per month. • Ability to arrive at a participating police department/hospital within 30 minutes in your designated coverage zone • Complete and sign new Angel paperwork. • At least 2 years of continuous sobriety and working a recovery program, if applicable. PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES: • Listen and engage with participants. • Provide resources and encouragement. • Assist participant with program paperwork. • Facilitate call for treatment on behalf of participant. • Help to facilitate transportation, if needed. • Remain with participant until transportation arrives. BACKGROUND CHECK DETAILS The duties of a Hope Not Handcuffs Angel will place the Angel in close personal contact with program applicants/ participants requesting assistance for addiction and recovery. In addition, it will create circumstances in which the Angel will interact with the public, fellow Angels, law enforcement personnel, and treatment providers, as well as having access to law enforcement facilities and sensitive participant information. For these reasons, the Hope Not Handcuffs has an obligation to help ensure the safety of participants, Angels, and members of the public which whom the Angel may come into contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Law - Confessions - Evidence Obtained Pursuant to an Illegal Arrest Is Inadmissable at Trial - Taylor V
    UCLA National Black Law Journal Title Constitutional Law - Confessions - Evidence Obtained Pursuant to an Illegal Arrest is Inadmissable at Trial - Taylor v. Alabama Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1q11z9h8 Journal National Black Law Journal, 8(2) ISSN 0896-0194 Author Palmer, Debra D. Publication Date 1983 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-CONFESSIONS- EVIDENCE OBTAINED PURSUANT TO AN ILLEGAL ARREST IS INADMISSIBLE AT TRIAL Taylor v. Alabama' I. INTRODUCTION The fourth amendment2 commands that every individual is protected against unreasonable searches and seizures and that this right shall not be violated. The amendment also provides that no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause. This note will examine the history, development, and current status of the fourth amendment exclusionary rule. Emphasis will be placed on Taylor v. Alabama,3 which is consistent with the Supreme Court's prior decisions.' The United States Supreme Court announced, through the opinion of Justice Marshall, that evidence obtained pursuant to an illegal arrest is inad- missible at trial. The controversy in Taylor was whether petitioner's confes- sion,5 which was obtained after a warrantless arrest6 based on less than probable cause,' should have been excluded from evidence as "fruit of the illegal arrest." Prior to petitioner's arrest there had been a number of robberies in the area and the police had initiated an intensive manhunt in an effort to appre- hend the robbers. An individual, who was at the time incarcerated, told an officer that he had heard that petitioner was involved in the robbery.
    [Show full text]