DOCSLIB.ORG

Saxony (Dresden)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saxony (Dresden) SAXONY (DRESDEN) Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.8, on 26 Sep 2021 at 18:11:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960116318000283 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.8, on 26 Sep 2021 at 18:11:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960116318000283 DRESDEN FO /: George Strachey to Earl Granville, No , Dresden, January [Received January by post. For: The Queen / X, Ch.W.D. [Charles Wentworth Dilke]; G[ranville]] Press views of Bismarck’s foreign policy and Germany’s leading role in Europe; England’s marginal role On the occasion of the New Year, the Saxon Press has spoken in very optimist language of the state of Europe, as guaranteeing a continu- ance of peace. The Germans seem to have a belief in the existence of a separate diplomatic faculty, to whose agency they ascribe events due more to the natural evolution of affairs than to the forethought and contrivance of statesmen. Prince Bismarck is credited with the monopoly of this force, with which he regulates at will the European alliances, bringing the continent into an international sys- tem controlled by Germany. The feeling that the Reichskanzler has created a German hegemony in Europe, is expressed in the ‘Dresdner Nachrichten’ in some remarks of which the following is the purport. ‘With admirable moderation and self-restraint, Prince Bismarck has so used the military and diplomatic preponderance of Germany, as to establish a certain moral order amongst the European states, which is maintained against all interrupters by the menace of the interference of the Empire. This gives it’s impor- tance to the German-Austrian Alliance of . Originally directed against France and Russia, the central European League of Peace has grown to be “the sole decisive factor and regulator of Europe”. Furthermore, around the central sun it has been possible to gather a circle of satellites. Into this European system even Russia herself has now been drawn, and France, standing aloof, is held to peace by the absorption of her energies in distant enterprises. On January . In the protocol of March Austria-Hungary and Germany prolonged their Dual Alliance of October (see n. in Berlin section). Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.8, on 26 Sep 2021 at 18:11:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960116318000283 DRESDEN It is characteristic of such articles in the German press, that they generally efface England from the international map. We may be named as exercising a certain indirect influence on Europe, through some Egyptian, or Chinese, incident, but, on the whole, the diplo- matic position assigned to us is that indicated in the well-known line of Virgil ‘penitus toto divisos orbe Britannos’. FO /: George Strachey to Earl Granville, No , Dresden, February [Received February by post. For: The Queen; X; G[ranville]] Spirited participation of Social Democrats in Saxon Landtag debates; other politicians begin- ning to tire of it The Social-Democrats in the Landtag are discharging their assumed duties as Tribunes of the People with an activity not shewn by them in any previous session. They intervene in every sitting with ques- tions, motions, remonstrances, and explanations, denouncing things and persons in language which, but for the privilege of Parliament would involve them in endless prosecutions for libel and sedition. Lt. von Vollmar is a ready & incisive debater: Liebknecht would be an ornament to the most illustrious of Assemblies: and such is the elo- quence of Bebel, that no topic is so mean that he cannot raise it in a few sentences to first-rate interest and importance. Hitherto the combined majority of Conservatives (), National- Liberals (), and Progressists (), has heard them with attention and tolerance, the President, who is a Conservative, shewing himself admirably impartial, and a determined stickler for the liberty of debate. However the daily Philippics of this ‘fourth Party’–their defiant manner, interruptions, and altercations with the chair – their invec- tives against officials – their hardly covered appeals to eventual Revolution – (I am using the language of Saxon politicians) – all this which, in effect, if not in intention, is obstruction, is tiring the Chamber. Accordingly, the majority are beginning to resort to the clôture, for which justification might be given on other grounds. I find, for Latin: ‘The Britons, separated from all the world’ (Virgil, Ecl..). Ludwig Haberkorn. French: ‘close’ (of session). Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.8, on 26 Sep 2021 at 18:11:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960116318000283 SAXONY instance, that of speeches delivered in certain recent debates, were made by the Social-Democrats. The other members can hardly be expected to go on submitting to this, especially, as the tor- rent of Bebel’s and Liebknecht’s eloquence far overflows the limits of time traditional for parliamentary speaking here. Their oratory can never influence the house: its’ object is the utilisation, for the benefit of their partizans out of doors, of the only place except the Reichstag where Social Democracy is not gagged. FO /: George Strachey to Earl Granville, No , Dresden, April [Received April by post. For: The Queen / Qy: Berlin; G[ranville]] General Fabrice on Saxon initiative in the Federal Council against suggestion to form an imperial ministry General Fabrice told me yesterday, in reply to a question of mine as to the real authorship of the debate in the Bundesrath on the respon- sible Imperial Ministry, that this step had been provoked by himself and his colleagues on their own initiatives. They had not acted on suggestions from any other quarter, but on their own sense of the necessity and policy of some such interchange of ideas between the Governments of Germany. The interpellation had not been pre- ceded by any correspondence with other Courts: the only prelim- inary was, that the King’s agents in the Bundesrath had, to a certain extent, felt the pulse of some of the other representatives before moving in the matter. When the General went on to speak of the motives of Saxony for taking this step, his expressions were so chaotic and incoherent, and his delivery was so ejaculatory and intermittent, that I could only obtain glimpses of his meaning. He talked with a certain emphasis of the necessity of shewing the German public, on the eve of the forthcoming election, that the allied Governments took their stand on Treaties, and were determined to resist the encroachments of the Democrats and Socialists. By ‘Democrats’ His Excellency meant Liberals in general, and, in particular, the new liberal party whose programme was next door to Socialism. The Democrats Federal Council. For the debate in the Federal Council on April , see pp. –. Elections to the Reichstag were to be held on October . Deutsche Freisinnige Partei. See n. in Berlin section. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.8, on 26 Sep 2021 at 18:11:58, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960116318000283 DRESDEN were giving trouble in Prussia, and Saxony thought it desirable to keep the cause of Government and order in the way supposed. I remarked, that the ostensible accusation against the United Liberals was, that they wanted to centralize, whereas His Excellency had now been denouncing them as Democrats: must I, then, understand, that the Saxon move in the Bundesrath was, after all, a mere electioneering manoeuvre designed in view of the coming appeal to the constituencies? The General replied –‘well! not absolutely that:’–but, nevertheless, refrained from claiming for his policy that higher political purpose affirmed in the Bundesrath as the basis of the whole proceeding. FO /: George Strachey to Earl Granville, No , Dresden, May [Received May by post. For: The Queen; X, Ch.W.D. [Charles Wentworth Dilke]; G[ranville]] Conditions and constraints on the Social Democrats in Germany; attitudes of crown adherents towards this party General Fabrice expects the Reichstag to pass the Bill for renewing the repressive measures of against Social-Democracy. In Germany the persons in the service of the Crown form a caste apart, no individual of which dares, or desires, to differ from the opinions which they all profess. The views of every one about every- thing political or administrative are absolutely identical with those of every one else in the given State, and of this rule the question on which I am writing is a signal exemplification. There is a perfect con- sensus of official opinion here, not only that under the law of Social Democracy has been silenced, but that the influence of Bebel and Liebknecht has been partly broken, and that the numbers and enthusiasms of their followers have diminished. Not long ago, the Saxon employé who is best versed in the subject assured me that the Catiline restlessness, the obstructive parliamentary tactics, The Anti-Socialist Law (Law against the Publicly Dangerous Endeavours of Social Democracy) of October banned social democratic and socialist societies, associ- ations, meetings, and publications which aimed at ‘the overthrow of the existing political or social order’. The law, which was originally limited to two and a half years, was pro- longed by the Reichstag on May .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Grave of John Keats Revisited
    The Keats-Shelley Review ISSN: 0952-4142 (Print) 2042-1362 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yksr20 The Grave of John Keats Revisited Nicholas Stanley-Price To cite this article: Nicholas Stanley-Price (2019) The Grave of John Keats Revisited, The Keats- Shelley Review, 33:2, 175-193, DOI: 10.1080/09524142.2019.1659018 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2019.1659018 Published online: 18 Sep 2019. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yksr20 THE KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW 2019, VOL. 33, NO. 2, 175–193 https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2019.1659018 ARTICLE The Grave of John Keats Revisited Nicholas Stanley-Price Advisory Committee, Non-Catholic Cemetery for Foreigners, Rome ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Many visitors in the nineteenth century to the grave of John Keats in John Keats; Rome; Rome thought it ‘neglected’ or ‘solitary’ and ‘unshaded’.Today’scritics Protestant cemetery; poet’s often characterize the grave as ‘marginal’, both literally and metaphori- grave; Percy Bysshe Shelley; cally, while ignoring the city authorities’ proposal to demolish it in the Joseph Severn; Romantics 1880s. An analysis of the grave’s original setting and its subsequent renovations suggests instead that it enjoyed a privileged position. Historical descriptions, when considered together with visitors’ accounts – avaluablesourceifusedcritically– and little-known artists’ depictions of Keats’s grave prompt a re-assessment of ideas of its ‘marginality’ and ‘neglect’ in the nineteenth century. The grave lies quite alone, and is evidently much neglected.
    [Show full text]
  • 1875, June 29]
    [1875, June 29] [From: Pickering, B.M.]1 [To: Lord Alfred Tennyson] 196 Piccadilly W June 29 1875 Sir Several years ago when the books of the late Sir C.W. Dilke2 were sold by auction I purchased a volume containing “The Lover’s Tale”3[.] I unfortunately lent it to Mr. Richard Herne Shepherd4 he expressing a great desire to read it and I at the time believing him a trustworthy person[.] Soon after this I found that he had dishonestly printed this poem from a transcript he had taken from my copy. On that occasion (by paying the printer, when he pretended he could not pay unless he sold copies) I induced him to suppress the copies and he handed me his transcript [Page 2] but either he had a duplicate transcript or a copy of the printed type for I have just discovered that he has a second time put the poem into type[.] Mr. Locker5 mentioned to me that an advertisement 1 Basil Montagu Pickering (1835-1878) was a publisher who specialized in rare books and first editions of nineteenth-century poets (see the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [ODNB]). Pickering published Tennysoniana in 1866. 2 Charles Wentworth Dilke (1789-1864) was a newspaper editor and writer who, at various stages in his career, contributed to or led such publications as Retrospective Review, London Magazine, The Athenaeum (of which Dilke became editor in 1831), and the Daily News. Dilke had many friends and acquaintances among the literary elite of the country, including John Keats, Leigh Hunt, George Eliot, and Percy Shelley (see ODNB).
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and References
    Notes and References Prologue: Food Security and the Literary Imagination 1. Jane Austen, Letter to Cassandra Austen, 23 Hans Place, 23–24 August 1814, in Jane Austen (1995), Jane Austen’s Letters, ed. Deirdre Le Faye, 4th edn (Oxford University Press), pp. 281–4 (p. 238). 1 Food Matters 1. Cited in Frank Dikötter (2010), Mao’s Great Famine: The History of China’s Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958–62 (London: Bloomsbury), unpaginated preliminary pages. 2. Harry Thompson (2011), Peter Cook: A Biography (London: Hachette, 2011; orig. pub. Hodder & Stoughton, 1997), p. 47. 3. Francisco Goya y Lucientes, Saturn Devouring his Son (1819–23), 1.43 m x 81 cm, Museo Nacional Del Prado, Madrid, Spain; Hannibal Lecter first appeared in Thomas Harris’s novel Red Dragon (1981). 4. Maggie Kilgour (1990), From Communion to Cannibalism: An Anatomy of Metaphors of Incorporation (Princeton University Press). 5. See, for example, Bonnie J. W. Martin, Jeri A. Logemann, Reza Shaker and Wylie J. Dodds (1994), ‘Coordination Between Respiration and Swallowing: Respiratory Phase Relationships and Temporal Integration,’ Journal of Applied Physiology 76: 714–23. 6. Suzanne Collins (2009), Catching Fire (New York: Scholastic Press), p. 22. The political use of food and hunger in the Hunger Games trilogy is discussed further in the Epilogue. 7. Colin Tudge (2004), So Shall We Reap: What’s Gone Wrong with the World’s Food – and How to Fix It (London: Penguin; orig. pub. Allen Lane, 2003), p. 34. 8. Daniel Quinn (2009), Ishmael: An Adventure of the Mind and Spirit (New York: Random House; orig. pub. Bantam, 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Some Remarks on Keats and His Friends
    SOME REMARKS ON KEATS AND HIS FRIENDS By SIR ROBERT ARMSTRONG-JONES, C.B.E., M.D., D.L. LONDON, ENGLAND HE function of poetry is to of short stature, with a long and oval express and embody beautiful face, arresting features even to the and elevated ideas in language casual passer-by, every lineament that can stir the emotions and strongly cut and delicately alive. His Tit has an orderly, methodical wayhead of was well shaped, his eyes were presenting its creations, generally with dark, sensitive, large and glowing. His metrical and rhythmic periods. Ebe hair was golden brown, thick and curly. poet is a creator, who begins with the Severn said his eyes were like the hazel concrete and leads on to abstract eyes of a wild gipsy maid. Haydon said thought, so as to arouse pleasurable he had an eye that had an inward look sentiments in combination with a feel­ perfectly divine like a Delphic priestess ing of power, wonder, curiosity, respect, that had visions. affection, exaltation and love or some­ He was born on October 31, 1795, in times of envy and hatred. a posting-house, the Swan and Hoop, Probably no poet has ever kindled now 85 Moorgate, London; opposite a deeper feeling of pity and sympathy the entrance to Finsbury Circus, and for than Keats, mingled as this has been this accident he was taunted as the with a compelling admiration for his “cockney” poet as contrasted with the brilliant but short life’s work, shorter “Lakists.” His father, Thomas Keats, than that of any noted English poet.
    [Show full text]
  • John Keats 1 John Keats
    John Keats 1 John Keats John Keats Portrait of John Keats by William Hilton. National Portrait Gallery, London Born 31 October 1795 Moorgate, London, England Died 23 February 1821 (aged 25) Rome, Italy Occupation Poet Alma mater King's College London Literary movement Romanticism John Keats (/ˈkiːts/; 31 October 1795 – 23 February 1821) was an English Romantic poet. He was one of the main figures of the second generation of Romantic poets along with Lord Byron and Percy Bysshe Shelley, despite his work only having been in publication for four years before his death.[1] Although his poems were not generally well received by critics during his life, his reputation grew after his death, so that by the end of the 19th century he had become one of the most beloved of all English poets. He had a significant influence on a diverse range of poets and writers. Jorge Luis Borges stated that his first encounter with Keats was the most significant literary experience of his life.[2] The poetry of Keats is characterised by sensual imagery, most notably in the series of odes. Today his poems and letters are some of the most popular and most analysed in English literature. Biography Early life John Keats was born in Moorgate, London, on 31 October 1795, to Thomas and Frances Jennings Keats. There is no clear evidence of his exact birthplace.[3] Although Keats and his family seem to have marked his birthday on 29 October, baptism records give the date as the 31st.[4] He was the eldest of four surviving children; his younger siblings were George (1797–1841), Thomas (1799–1818), and Frances Mary "Fanny" (1803–1889) who eventually married Spanish author Valentín Llanos Gutiérrez.[5] Another son was lost in infancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Background of “Ode to a Nightingale” “Ode to a Nightingale” Is a Poem By
    Background of “Ode to a Nightingale” “Ode to a Nightingale” is a poem by John Keats written either in the garden of the Spaniards Inn, Hampstead, London or, according to Keats’ friend Charles Armitage Brown, under a plum tree in the garden of Keats’ house at Wentworth Place, also in Hampstead. According to Brown, a nightingale had built its nest near the house Keats and Brown shared in the spring of 1819. Inspired by the bird’s song, Keats composed the poem in one day in May 1819 and first published in the Annals of the Fine Arts in July 1819. Interestingly, in both the original draft and in its first publication, it is titled “Ode to the Nightingale”. The title was altered by Keats’s publishers. Twenty years after the poet’s death, Joseph Severn painted the famous portrait “Keats listening to a nightingale on Hampstead Heath”. Joseph Severn depiction of “Keats listening to a nightingale (c. 1845) Critics generally agree that Nightingale was the second of the five ‘great odes’ of 1819 and its themes are reflected in its ‘twin’ ode, ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’. Of Keats’s major odes of 1819, “Ode to Psyche”, was probably written first and “To Autumn” written last. It is possible that “Ode to a Nightingale” was written between 26 April and 18 May 1819, based on weather conditions and similarities between images in the poem and those in a letter sent to Fanny Keats on May Day. Keats’s friend and roommate, Charles Armitage Brown, described the composition of this beautiful work as follows: “In the spring of 1819 a nightingale had built her nest near my house.
    [Show full text]
  • John Keats (1795-1821)
    30 SEEKER OF BEAUTY, VICTIM OF PAssION JOHN KEATS (1795-1821) omparing himself with Byron, Keats writes, “There is this great difference between us: Che describes what he sees—I describe what I imagine.” Byron sees a great deal of life and of nature; Keats, in contrast, has a narrowly circum- scribed existence. John Keats, who is born on 31 October 1795, has an unsettled childhood. In 1804, when he is eight years old, his father, who works in an inn, is killed in a riding accident. John’s brothers, George and Tom, are then seven and five respec- tively, and his sister, Fanny, is not yet one. Two months after the fatal ac- cident, his mother remarries, and the children are soon transferred to the care of her parents, John and Alice Jennings. The bond between the four siblings remains extremely strong. After being educated, like his brothers, at a school run by the hu- mane and liberal John Clarke, Keats is apprenticed in 1810 to a surgeon. In 1816, in spite of the high failure rate, he passes the necessary examination and becomes a Licentiate of the Society of Apothecaries. However, he is already writing poetry and does not take the expected next step to train as a surgeon. He publishes a book entitled Poems in 1817 and the long poem Endymion next year. By this time, he is part of a literary and artistic circle which includes Leigh Hunt, William Hazlitt, and Benjamin Haydon. His desire is to study, travel and write, but most of his legacy from his maternal grandparents has gone to fund his medical education.
    [Show full text]
  • Keats House Accreditation
    APPENDIX 2 Keats House Collections Development Policy September 2016 Vicky Carroll Principal Curator 1 Name of museum: Keats House Name of governing body: City of London Corporation – Culture, Heritage and Libraries Committee Date on which this policy was approved by governing body: October 2016 Policy review procedure: This document will be reviewed at least every 5 years. The collections development policy will be published and reviewed from time to time, at least once every five years. Date at which this policy is due for review: October 2021 Arts Council England will be notified of any changes to the collections development policy, and the implications of any such changes for the future of collections. 1. Relationship to other relevant policies/plans of the organisation: 1.1. The museum’s statement of purpose is: Keats House is a registered charity (for which the City of London Corporation is the sole trustee) whose object is ‘to preserve and maintain and restore for the education and benefit of the public the land with the buildings known as Keats House as a museum and live memorial to John Keats and as a literary meeting place and centre’. 1.2. The governing body will ensure that both acquisition and disposal are carried out openly and with transparency. 1.3. By definition, the museum has a long-term purpose and holds collections in trust for the benefit of the public in relation to its stated objectives. The governing body therefore accepts the principle that sound curatorial reasons must be established before consideration is given to any acquisition to the collection, or the disposal of any items in the museum’s collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Aura and Authenticity and the Presentation of UK Literary Figures Through the Medium of the Home
    Aura and Authenticity in the Presentation of UK Literary Figures through the Medium of the Home Item Type Article Authors Pardoe, James Citation Pardoe, J. (2015). Aura and authenticity and the presentation of UK literary figures through the medium of the home. Scrutiny2: issues in English Studies in Southern Africa, 20(2), 65-79. DOI 10.1080/18125441.2015.1072839 Publisher Routledge Taylor & Francis Group Journal Scrutiny2: issues in English Studies in Southern Africa Download date 02/10/2021 16:44:42 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/604362 Aura and Authenticity and the Presentation of UK Literary Figures through the Medium of the Home Dr James Pardoe, University of Chester, UK Abstract: By exploring case studies from the UK, this paper investigates how the notions of aura and authenticity at literary homes are utilised to create an impact on the understanding of the lives and works of associated writers. The boundaries of this paper have been dictated by its place within twenty-first century manifestations of the survival, conservation and reproduction of literary homes associated with four writers active in the early nineteenth century: Lord Byron, John Keats, Sir Walter Scott and Percy Shelley. Many of the works within the literary house genre highlight the significance of the link between writers and their audiences. However, whereas commentators concentrate on the links being direct, this paper shows that the association is based on narratives validated through those who were subsequently responsible for the houses in conjunction with the expectations of visitors. Consequently, the interpretation prevalent in the houses in the twenty-first century are the result of a long history based on the writers, but influenced by what was, and is, considered their significance by others over approximately two hundred years.
    [Show full text]
  • John Keats 1795-1821
    http://www.englishworld2011.info/ 878 JOHN KEATS 1795-1821 John Keats's father was head stableman at a London livery stable; he married his employer's daughter and inherited the business. The poet's mother, by all reports, was an affectionate but negligent parent to her children; remarrying almost imme- diately after a fall from a horse killed her first husband, she left the eight-year-old John (her firstborn), his brothers, and a sister with their grandmother and did not reenter their lives for four years. The year before his father's death, Keats had been sent to the Reverend John Clarke's private school at Enfield, famous for its progressive curriculum, where he was a noisy, high-spirited boy; despite his small stature (when full-grown, he was barely over five feet in height), he distinguished himself in sports and fistfights. Here he had the good fortune to have as a mentor Charles Cowden Clarke, son of the headmaster, who later became a writer and an editor; he encour- aged Keats's passion for reading and, both at school and in the course of their later friendship, introduced him to Spenser and other poets, to music, and to the theater. When Keats's mother returned to her children, she was already ill, and in 1810 she died of tuberculosis. Although the livery stable had prospered, and £8,000 had been left in trust to the children by Keats's grandmother, the estate remained tied up in the law courts for all of Keats's lifetime. The children's guardian, Richard Abbey, an unimaginative and practical-minded businessman, took Keats out of school at the age of fifteen and bound him apprentice to Thomas Hammond, a surgeon and apothecary at Edmonton.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Armitage Brown, John Keats and Plymouth1 University of St
    Charles Armitage Brown, John Keats and Plymouth1 NICHOLAS ROE University of St Andrews In the mean time I will tell you about our Plymouth Institution. We have many literary and scientific men here, three rather high in fame, and they are members. During the six winter months we have a lecture and an after discussion there every Thursday, and during the summer tea and coffee once a month to keep us together and settle various points. The building is very handsome, of Grecian architecture. Ill as I was, some how I ventured to get up with a speech in my mouth before a hundred strangers, — (I that never had spoken ten words before ten such!) — and, to my surprise, made an impression. I am now hand in hand with them. In March, just as their season was ending, they were disappointed of a lecture; when I, bettering in health, read them one on “Shakespear’s Sonnets”. I am down for one next November on “The intellectual history of Florence”, and, if I wanted, for another on “The influence of Italian on English poetry”. This Institution suits me to a hair. I have lately been made their librarian. Every summer, (and this is a third) the Institution is opened as a gallery of paintings and drawings by resident and other artists, — and I am on the Committee, — nay, on the hanging one. I shall send my Hogarths, my two portraits of Keats from you, and the medallion in plaister of him by Girometti, which Woodhouse gave me; and also Kirkup’s drawings of yourself and Carlino, — […] you will be exhibited at Plymouth!2 So Charles Armitage Brown wrote to Joseph Severn, a resident at Rome since John Keats’s death there in 1821.
    [Show full text]
  • Homes and Haunts: Memorialising Romantic Writers 2011 James
    Homes and Haunts: Memorialising Romantic Writers A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of PhD in the Faculty of Humanities 2011 James Henry Pardoe School of Arts, Histories and Cultures CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES Page 4 ABBREVIATIONS Page 6 ABSTRACT Page 7 DECLARATION Page 8 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT Page 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Page 10 DEDICATION Page 12 INTRODUCTION: Page 13 Homes and Haunts of the Romantic Age Page 13 Thesis Aims Page 20 Methodology and Sources Page 24 Thesis Structure Page 27 CHAPTER ONE: Page 31 CRITICAL CONTEXTS Page 31 CHAPTER TWO: Page 49 ABBOTSFORD HOUSE Page 49 Introduction Page 49 Scott‟s House: Scott, The Borders & Abbotsford 1773-1832 Page 51 „Waverley in Stone‟: Scott‟s Memorial 1832-2004 Page 62 The House in the Early Twenty-First Century: The Abbotsford Trust 2004-2007 Page 86 Conclusion Page 99 CHAPTER THREE: Page103 NEWSTEAD ABBEY Page 103 Introduction Page 103 The „Byron House‟: to 1817 Page 105 The „Byronic House‟: 1817-1931 Page 118 2 From Private House to Public Museum: 1931-2002 Page 134 The House in the Twenty-First Century: a Result of an Historical Process Page 144 Conclusion Page 156 CHAPTER FOUR: Page 159 KEATS HOUSE & THE KEATS-SHELLEY MEMORIAL HOUSE Page 159 Introduction Page 159 Keats House Page 162 A Home of Keats Becomes Keats House and Memorial: 1818-1997 Page 162 Keats House and the City of London: 1997-2007 Page 177 Keats-Shelley Memorial House Page 190 Piazza di Spagna 26 – KSMH: 1903-1997 Page 190 KSMH: 1997-2006 Page 205 Conclusions Page 214 CONCLUSION Page 218 FIGURES Page 225 BIBLIOGRAPHY Page 258 Manuscripts Page 258 Printed Primary Sources Page 260 Interviews Page 263 Houses Page 263 Other Primary Sources Page 264 Secondary Sources Page 265 Word Count: 74,116 3 LIST OF FIGURES 1.
    [Show full text]