Acea Tax Guide 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
County Tax Settlement Guide
SUGGESTED PROCEDURES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE COUNTY FINAL TAX SETTLEMENT June 1, 2019 SUGGESTED PROCEDURES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE COUNTY FINAL TAX SETTLEMENT INDEX Tax Settlement Narrative Real Estate Page 1 – 4 Personal Page 5 – 6 Utility and Carrier Page 7 Net Tax and Distribution of Net Tax Page 7 – 11 Excess Collector’s Commission Page 12 Tax Settlement Checklist Page 13 Sample Tax Settlement Exhibits Page 14 – 22 Rate Calculation Examples Page 23 – 25 Cost Sheet Example Page 26 Monthly Distribution of Ad Valorem Taxes Page 27 Monthly Distribution of Sales Tax Rebate Page 28 Sales Tax Final Tax Settlement Page 29 – 30 General Information Pertaining to Ad Valorem Taxation Page 31 – 55 Certain Legislative Acts Pertaining to Taxes Page 56 – 66 GENERAL NARRATIVE The millage rates used for the extension of taxes will be those millage rates levied by the Quorum Court in its regular meeting in November of each year, in accordance with Ark. Code Ann. § 14- 14-904. The 2001 Legislature amended Ark. Code Ann. § 14-14-904, allowing the Quorum Court to correct millage levies in cases where an incorrect levy was due to clerical errors and/or the failure of the taxing entity to report the correct millage. The correction is effected by a county court order. In this manual, the millage rates have equalized for all taxing units and, therefore, are the same for both real estate and personal property. The breakdown of this sample tax settlement into real, personal, and utility taxes has a dual purpose: (1) to provide a mechanism to identify and isolate possible errors by type of tax and (2) to recognize those counties where the real and personal tax rates have not yet equalized. -
Risultati 2013 E Business Plan 2014-2018
ACEA GROUP 2013 Results Business Plan 2014-2018 Agenda Acea Group description 3 2014-2018 Business Plan highlights • Environment 5 • Energy 10 • Water 15 • Grids 22 • Corporate 29 • Acea Group 31 Business Plan Key Takeaways 35 Closing remarks 37 APPENDIX 2013 Results 40 9M2013 Results 50 1H2013 Results 52 2012 Results 54 Acea Group description: an Integrated Multi-Utility ACEA Group Acea is one of the leading Italian multi-utilities. The company engages in the development of grids and services in the water, energy and environmental sectors. Founded in 1909, ACEA has been listed on the Italian Stock Exchange since 1999. The City of Rome is the largest shareholder. Group Structure Shareholder Structure ENVIRONMENT ENERGY WATER 18.15% 100% Acea Risorse e 100% Acea Energia Holding 96% Acea Ato2 Impianti per 100% Acea Energia l’Ambiente 100% Acea Produzione 94% Acea Ato5 2.02% 99% Sarnese Vesuviano 37% Gori 88% Acquaser 100% Crea Gestioni 51.00% 100% Acea8cento 50% Ecomed 40% Umbra Acque 16.35% 85% Ombrone 40% Acquedotto del Fiora GRIDS OTHER SERVICES 69% Acque Blu Arno Basso 100% Acea Reti e Servizi 45% Acque 12.48% Energetici 100% Laboratori 69% Acque Blu Fiorentine 50% Acea Distribuzione 40% Publiacqua City of Rome 51% Ecogena 49% Acea illuminazione Suez Environnement Company SA (held through Ondeo Italia) Pubblica 35% Intesa Aretina Caltagirone Group 46% Nuove Acque 50% Acea Illuminazione Norges Bank Pubblica 1% Ingegnerie Toscane Other 50% Acea Distribuzione 25% Consorcio Agua Azul Source: CONSOB (March 2014) 51% Aguazul Bogotà 100% Acea Domenicana 3 Acea Group description: Main Business Units ACEA Group A leading player in the Italian market ENVIRONMENT Acea ranks fifth in Italy for waste treated, with over 700,000 tons in 2013. -
Italian Competition Law Newsletter, October 2019
October 2019 Italian Competition Law Newsletter — Highlights — The TAR Lazio rules on Enel’s and Acea’s appeals against ICA decisions that the incumbents abused their dominant position in local markets for retail electricity supply. — The Court of Salerno rules on the invalidity of a guarantee agreement containing clauses from an anticompetitive form. The TAR Lazio reviews ICA decisions on alleged abuses of dominant position in the retail supply of electricity On October 17, 2019, the Regional Administrative on procedural reasons, such as the fact that both Tribunal for Latium (the “TAR Lazio”) ruled decisions were adopted by a board composed of on appeals by companies belonging to the Enel only two members (which did not include the and Acea groups, two major energy firms active, President of the ICA). among others, in the distribution and sale of electricity in Italy, against Italian Competition Background Authority (“ICA”)’s decisions finding that the two On December 20, 2018, in parallel proceedings incumbents had abused their dominant position in against Enel and Acea, the ICA found that the local markets for retail electricity supply.1 two incumbents had infringed Article 102 TFEU The TAR Lazio upheld Acea’s appeals and annulled by carrying out an abusive strategy based on their the Acea Decision.2 Conversely, Enel’s appeals position as companies active in both the enhanced against the Enel Decision were upheld only with protection service (“EPS”) and the retail supply of respect to the fine calculation.3 As a consequence, electricity at market prices. the TAR Lazio ordered the ICA to recalculate The EPS is a regulated regime, reserved to domestic the fine imposed on Enel on the basis of the clients and small businesses that do not opt for parameters indicated in the TAR Lazio’s Enel offers at market prices. -
ACEA Tax Guide 2018.Pdf
2018 WWW.ACEA.BE Foreword The 2018 edition of the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association’s annual Tax Guide provides an overview of specific taxes that are levied on motor vehicles in European countries, as well as in other key markets around the world. This comprehensive guide counts more than 300 pages, making it an indispensable tool for anyone interested in the European automotive industry and relevant policies. The 2018 Tax Guide contains all the latest information about taxes on vehicle acquisition (VAT, sales tax, registration tax), taxes on vehicle ownership (annual circulation tax, road tax) and taxes on motoring (fuel tax). Besides the 28 member states of the European Union, as well as the EFTA countries (Iceland, Norway and Switzerland), this Tax Guide also covers countries such as Brazil, China, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Turkey and the United States. The Tax Guide is compiled with the help of the national associations of motor vehicle manufacturers in all these countries. I would like to extend our sincere gratitude to all involved for making the latest information available for this publication. Erik Jonnaert ACEA Secretary General Copyright Reproduction of the content of this document is not permitted without the prior written consent of ACEA. Whenever reproduction is permitted, ACEA shall be referred to as source of the information. Summary EU member countries 5 EFTA 245 Other countries 254 EU member states EU summary tables 5 Austria 10 Belgium 19 Bulgaria 42 Croatia 48 Cyprus 52 Czech Republic 55 Denmark 65 Estonia 79 Finland 82 France 88 Germany 100 Greece 108 Hungary 119 Ireland 125 Italy 137 Latvia 148 Lithuania 154 Luxembourg 158 Malta 168 Netherlands 171 Poland 179 Portugal 184 Romania 194 Slovakia 198 Slovenia 211 Spain 215 Sweden 224 United Kingdom 234 01 EU summary tables Chapter prepared by Francesca Piazza [email protected] ACEA European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association Avenue des Nerviens 85 B — 1040 Brussels T. -
Regulation & Compliance Road Tax – Vehicle Excise Duty Fact Sheet – October 2018
Regulation & Compliance Road Tax – Vehicle Excise Duty Fact Sheet – October 2018 Background The majority of vehicles driven on UK roads have to pay Vehicle Excise Duty (VED, also know as road fund licence). This page provides guidance to members on the current rates, how to pay and obtain refunds. How is VED calculated for cars? The vehicle excise duty is calculated based on the CO2 emissions of the car for the first year of registration and the list price of the car in years 2 to 7. If the list price of the car is over £40,000 a more expensive rate of VED is payable in years 2 to 7. The list price includes the price of the vehicle and any non-standard accessory which is attached to the vehicle when it is first registered. This includes: • Manufacturers Recommended Retail Price • The price of any non-standard option – fitted by the manufacturer • VAT • Electric cars – if the battery is leased then the cost of the battery constitutes parts of the list price • Delivery charges including pre delivery inspection charges It does not include: • Warranty / insurance and service packages etc • Any non-standard accessory – fitted by the dealer • Modifications such as ‘police packs’, ambulance / fire engine modifications • Modifications for disabled drivers The purpose of this fact sheet is to provide general guidance and information only. Although every effort is made to ensure that the content is accurate, the BVRLA cannot accept any liability whatsoever for any inaccuracy contained within it, nor for any damage or loss, direct or indirect, which may be suffered as a result of any reliance placed upon the information provided, whether arising in contract, tort or in any other way. -
Acea Spa Financial Statements
2016 ACEA SPA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ACEA GROUP ACEA SPPA FINANCIAL STTATEMENTS CONSOLIDAATED FINANCIAL STTATEMENTS ACEA GROUP CONTENTS 6 ACEA AT A GLANCE 17 REPORT ON OPERATIONS 18 Corporate bodies 19 Summary of results 21 Summary of operations and income, equity and financial performance of the Group 28 Reference context 43 Trends of operating segments 43 Economic results by segments 46 Environment Operating Segment 49 Energy Operating Segment 49 Water Operating Segment 55 Networks Operating Segment 58 Corporate 59 Significant events during and after the period 61 Main risks and uncertainties 65 Operating outlook 66 Resolutions on profit for the year and distribution to Shareholders 69 ACEA S.P.A. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 70 Form and structure 71 Measurement criteria and accounting standards 76 Accounting standards, amendments, interpretations and improvements applied from 1 January 2016 78 Accounting standards, amendments and interpretations applicable after the end of the year and not adopted in advance 81 Income Statement 81 Statement of Comprehensive Income 82 Statement of Financial Position 83 Statement of changes in shareholders’ equity at 31 December 2015 83 Statement of changes in shareholders’ equity at 31 December 2016 84 Statement of Cash Flows 85 Notes to the Income Statement 91 Notes to the Statement of Financial Position - Assets 99 Notes to the Statement of Financial Position - Liabilities 106 Related Party Transactions 109 List of related party transactions 110 Updates on major disputes and litigation 113 Additional disclosures on financial instruments and risk management policies 116 Commitments and contingencies 117 Annexes 4 ACEA GROUP • 2016 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 124 Report of the board of the statutory auditors 135 Independent auditors’ report 138 Certification of separate financial statements in accordance with art. -
Submission to the Australian Government's Taxation White Paper
Submission to the Australian Government’s Taxation White Paper JUNE 2015 Contents Page Executive Summary 3 Transparent 3 Fair 4 Efficient 4 The Case for Reform 5 Introduction 5 Transparent 6 Motoring Taxation: What do Motorists Pay? 6 Fuel Taxation 7 Fuel Excise 7 Effects of the Reintroduction of Indexation 8 Interim Step – Revenue & Expenditure on Roads 9 Fuel Tax Credits 11 GST 11 Recommendations 12 Fair 12 Customs Duty 12 Luxury Car Tax 13 State and Territory Taxes 14 Registration 14 Stamp Duty 15 Recommendations 16 Efficient 16 The Current State of Funding for Roads 16 Infrastructure Reform 18 Previous Reviews 18 Medium to Long-Term Reform: Road User Charging 20 Principles for Australian Road Pricing Reforms 21 Which Road User Charging Models Might be Considered 21 Charges to Toll Providers Based on Performance 22 Recommendations 22 Executive Summary The AAA appreciates the opportunity to provide input into the Australian Government’s Tax White Paper process. The Government’s Infrastructure Audit clearly outlines the need for ongoing infrastructure investment that will allow new economic and social opportunities to be realised. Future funding constraints therefore present a core challenge to realising these opportunities and this Tax White Paper is an opportunity to outline the required program of reform. Existing institutional arrangements, especially in the transport sector, do not provide sufficient funding to address future infrastructure needs1. The combined expenditure of the public and private sectors on infrastructure will need to be expanded, all at a time when spending by governments is being constrained by other legitimate competing demands (notably health services and welfare). -
Acea Spa Financial Statements Acea Group Spa Consolidated Financial Statements
Acea SpA fi nancial statements Acea Group SpA consolidated fi nancial statements 2008 Acea SpA financial statements Acea Group SpA consolidated financial statements 2008 2008 Acea SpA financial statements Acea Group SpA consolidated financial statements Acea SpA Registered office Piazzale Ostiense 2 – 00154 Rome Share capital 1,098,898,884 euros, fully paid-up Tax code, VAT number and Rome Companies’ Register no. 05394801004 Registered in Rome at REA no. 882486 Prepared by Planning and Finance Editorial coordination External Relations and Communication Graphic design, editing and copyediting Message Photographs Acea archives Fabio Anghelone Printed by Primaprint Printed in April 2009 Contents Management report on operations The Acea Group 12 Other information 63 Acea SpA share price Management performance 63 Shareholdings of directors Medium/long-term incentive and statutory auditors 14 schemes 65 Corporate Governance 16 Executive Responsible for Financial Reporting 65 Powers of the Board of Directors, Third tariff cycle 66 the Chairman and Chief Executive Antitrust Authority investigation Officer of Acea SpA and the of the acquisition of Publiacqua 67 Executive Responsible for Financial Reporting 17 Events after 31 December 2008 68 Chairman’s statement 19 Risks and uncertainties 69 Acea Group financial highlights Regulatory risk 69 for 2008 23 Legislative risk 72 Strategic risk 73 Group operating review 23 Operational risk 75 Energy networks 23 Litigation risk 76 Electricity transmission 24 Service quality 25 Outlook 80 Energy services, -
5.1 Vehicle Costs This Chapter Examines Direct Financial Costs of Vehicle Use
Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis – Vehicle Costs Victoria Transport Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org) 5.1 Vehicle Costs This chapter examines direct financial costs of vehicle use. These are divided into fixed costs, which are unaffected by mileage, and variable costs, which increase with mileage. This indicates the savings from transportation improvements that allow consumers to reduce their vehicle ownership and use. Definitions Vehicle Costs include various costs to own and use vehicles, and incremental equipment costs for telework. These indicate the savings that result when vehicle ownership and use are reduced. These costs are divided into fixed (also called ownership) and variable (also called operating, marginal or incremental) costs, as indicated below. Variable costs increase with vehicle mileage, fixed costs do not. Fixed Costs Variable Costs Vehicle purchase or lease Maintenance and repair Insurance Fuel, fuel taxes and oil Registration and vehicle taxes Paid parking and tolls Some costs that are considered fixed are actually partly variable. Depreciation is partly variable because increased mileage requires increased vehicle repairs and replacement, and reduces vehicle resale value. Used vehicle price guides (www.edmunds.com and www.kbb.com) indicate that mileage-related depreciation typically averages 5-15¢ per mile, about as much as vehicle operating costs. Most leased vehicles have additional charges averaging about 10¢ per mile for mileage over a certain annual mileage (typically 15,000 miles). Increased driving also increases the risk of additional user costs from crashes, traffic and parking citations. Mileage-Based Depreciation Example (by Art Ludwig, www.oasisdesign.net) It is significantly more expensive to drive your car, and you save much more when you reduce your vehicle mileage, than indicated by the American Automobile Association’s widely reproduced car cost estimates (www.aaa-calif.com/members/corpinfo/costbrch.asp). -
Competition Law in Italy the First 20 Years of Law and Practice
Mario Siragusa – Matteo Beretta – Matteo Bay Competition Law in Italy The first 20 years of law and practice CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION A. General Comparison of Italy’s Competition Laws, Enforcement, Procedures with Those of the United States B. Overview of Applicable Statutes 1. Main Legislative Reforms (a) Interim Measures (b) Commitments (c) Leniency Program 2. Relationship between EU and National Competition Rules C. Overview of Structure, Independence and Jurisdiction of Enforcement Agencies D. Overview of Structure, Independence, and Jurisdiction of Judicial Authorities E. Additional Policy & Practical Considerations 1. Costs and Time Considerations in Litigation 2. Costs and Time Considerations in Administrative Proceedings 3. Intervention of Agencies and Political Bodies in Litigation II. OVERVIEW A. General Policies Underlying Italy’s Competition Laws 1. Consumer Welfare 2. Protection of Smaller Enterprises Against Larger Enterprises 3. Protection of Domestic Enterprises Against Foreign Competition B. Role of Economic Doctrines and Analysis 1. Generally 2. Use of Specific Economic Analysis 3. Extent to Which Courts Have Embraced Economic Analysis III. SUBSTANTIVE LAW A. Horizontal Agreements and Practices 1. General Principles (a) Introduction (b) The Notion of “Undertaking” (c) Agreements, Decisions, and Concerted Practices (d) Restrictive Object or Effect (e) Appreciability of the Restriction (f) The Burden of Proof (g) Reliability of Documentary Evidence (h) Relevance of Criminal Findings in the Context of the Competition Authority’s -
The Impact of Energy Efficient Vehicles on Gas Tax (Highway Trust Fund) and Alternative Funding for Infrastructure Construction, Upgrade, and Maintenance
MICHIGAN OHIO UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER Alternate energy and system mobility to stimulate economic development. Report No: MIOH UTC TS51 2012-Final The Impact of Energy Efficient Vehicles on Gas Tax (Highway Trust Fund) and Alternative Funding for Infrastructure Construction, Upgrade, and Maintenance FINAL REPORT PROJECT TEAM Utpal Dutta Ph.D. P.E Nishita Patel Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering University of Detroit Mercy 4001 W. McNichols Road Detroit, MI 48221 Report No: MIOH UTC TS51 2012-Final Developed By: Utpal Dutta Principal Investigator, UDM Phone (313)993-1040 [email protected] Nishita Patel Graduate Student, UDM SPONSORS This is a Michigan Ohio University Transportation Center project funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the University of Detroit Mercy. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described in this report was supported through the Michigan Ohio University Transportation Center with funding provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and matching funding from the University of Detroit Mercy. In addition to the sponsors, the authors would like to express their appreciation to the Michigan Department of Transportation and the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) for their generous assistance in time and information. This support is gratefully acknowledged. DISCLAIMERS The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Michigan State Transportation Commission, the Michigan Department of Transportation, or the Federal Highway Administration. -
Used Motor Vehicle Imports and the Impact on Transportation in Zambia Working Paper No
Used Motor Vehicle Imports and the Impact on Transportation in Zambia Working Paper No. 21 December 2014 “Working towards the formulation of sound economic policies”. Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. OBJECTIVES 7 3. METHODOLOGY 8 3.1. Desk Review 8 3.2. Key informant Interviews 8 3.3. Data and Data Analysis 8 3.4. Definitions of Concepts 8 4. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 10 4.1. The average age of Zambia’s Motor Vehicle Fleet is increasing 10 A significant cause of this average age is that imported vehicles are getting 4.2. 13 older. 4.3. The fit Lifespan of second-hand Motor Vehicles in Zambia is low 15 4.4. The number of vehicles which are deemed unfit has increased significantly 15 4.5. Road Worthiness Inspections 17 4.6. Apparent disconnect between fitness status and crash rates 18 4.7. Policy Framework 18 CONTENTS 4.8. Policy Recommendation 21 4.8.1. The three short term policy options are: 22 4.8.2. Medium to Long Term Policy Options 24 5. CONCLUSION 26 REFERENCES 27 ANNEXURE 28 Transportation and Infrastructure Development i ii Transportation and Infrastructure Development EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In May, 2014, then Transport, Works, Supply and Communications Minister Christopher Yaluma, announced that Government would not limit the age of motor vehicles imported into Zambia. This was in response to concerns voiced by some stakeholders in the transport sector regarding the condition of some of the second-hand motor vehicle imports. The Minister argued that limiting the age of imported motor vehicles would disadvantage the majority of Zambians who can hardly afford to buy motor vehicles.