New Zealand's Emergent Opioid Trends

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Zealand's Emergent Opioid Trends New Zealand’s emergent opioid trends - the influences and impacts: Consumer and clinician understanding of New Zealand’s changing patterns of opioid use, availability and impacts Klare Braye A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Health Sciences Department of Psychological Medicine University of Otago, Christchurch New Zealand 2014 “Among the remedies which it has pleased Almighty God to give to man to relieve his sufferings, none is so universal and so efficacious as opium”. (Sir Thomas Sydenham, 1680) ~ iii ~ Abstract This thesis explores opioid users and addiction service providers’ understandings of the changing patterns, availability and impacts of opioids and opioid use in New Zealand with a particular focus on the last two decades. Throughout history, the availability of substances of abuse have waxed and waned. Their emergence and availability is influenced by social, legislative and political circumstances. Extensive literature exists related to the use of opioids such as morphine and methadone in New Zealand, and heroin overseas. However, few studies have examined the emerging trends of opioids that are often used as adjunctively to these substances; examples of which in recent years include poppy seed tea (PST), over-the- counter codeine-containing analgesics and most recently some prescribed pain medications. Information regarding the use, availability and impacts of these adjunct opioids from the consumers who use them, and the clinicians who work with these consumers could usefully inform service provision and public policy. This qualitative study, adopting a Husserlian phenomenological philosophy was used, to gain an understanding of the use, access to and implications of these emergent opioid trends. Nine opioid users and five service providers were recruited through purposeful sampling as key informant participants. Their stories were elicited through in-depth interviews and analysis allowed for descriptive interpretation of participants’ experiences to emerge. The experiences described by participants were varied, although a general pattern indicated the ebb and flow of the adjunctive use of a range of opioids in New Zealand. The diverse and at times, localised sources of supply of these opioids are described. The roles of legislative processes and policy, government agencies, pharmaceutical companies, prescribers, pharmacists, and the users themselves as creative and flexible people are discussed. The findings of this study offer insights into the ways in which opioid availability is inextricably interwoven with the impacts that availability can have on the user. Reference is made to mortality and morbidity, as well as the impacts of ~ v ~ displacement; the unintended consequences of stigma, discrimination, and criminalisation; and the accessibility of some opioid formulations, notably metered doses and abuse deterrent formulations (ADF). Overarching these descriptions is the sense that opioid users are in the main resourceful and adaptable, and that opioids hold a persistent place in the lives of dependent users. Recommendations from this study fit within a harm minimisation perspective that considers the needs of the dependent user, alongside the general population and a context of ‘public good’. These findings and recommendations support the need to appreciate the challenges facing opioid users who access treatment or support for their substance use; to consider the availability and access to a range of opioids from the perspective of minimising harm; to carefully consider the responsibilities of a number of stakeholders; to inform treatment delivery, workforce development and in the consideration of policy development and implementation. ~ vi ~ Acknowledgements My greatest appreciation goes to the participants in this study, without whom this work would not have been possible. The openness, honesty and willingness to share their stories with me was humbling. Many thanks also to the staff at both the needle exchange (Drugs and Health Development Project) and opioid treatment service who affirmed my interest in this study and aided me in the quest for service user participants. Secondly, I am indebted to my children, Hayleigh and Olliver, who tolerated their mum’s grumpiness, maintained sanity in the house and reminded me of what was important in life. And to my partner, Phil, who did not know what he was getting himself in to, but journeyed alongside me the whole way. Thank you. Special thanks goes to Dr. Ria Schroder, my primary supervisor and Dr. Daryle Deering for their encouragement, support and often all too honest feedback that guided me in my blindness to a better place of understanding in both the formulation of this thesis and in my own journey as a research student. I am looking forward to resuming conversations with them above and beyond the world of thesis writing. I must also thank all those who have assisted in the proof reading, transcribing, editing and formatting of this work, especially Helen, who ensured anonymity by being 12,000 miles away. And to Sarah - for your motivation and encouragement to keep on going. You never got to see me through the finish line, but I know that you will always be there with me. Miss you. ~ vii ~ Table of contents Abstract ..................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ................................................................................ vii Table of contents ..................................................................................... ix List of figures ........................................................................................... xv List of abbreviations ..............................................................................xvii Chapter 1 - Introduction ........................................................................... 1 1.1 Context ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Thesis overview .......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Terminology ................................................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................4 1.3.2 Drugs and medications ................................................................................5 1.3.3 Opioids .......................................................................................................5 1.3.4 Substance use ..............................................................................................6 Chapter 2 - Literature Review .................................................................. 9 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Literature searches .................................................................................... 10 2.3 Common substances reported in this study ............................................... 10 2.3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 10 2.3.2 The opioids ................................................................................................ 11 2.3.2.1 The opium poppy - Papaver somniferum .............................................. 11 2.3.2.2 Poppy seed and poppy seed tea ............................................................ 11 2.3.2.3 Morphine ............................................................................................. 12 2.3.2.4 Codeine ............................................................................................... 12 2.3.2.5 Methadone........................................................................................... 13 2.3.2.6 Oxycodone .......................................................................................... 13 2.3.2.7 Buprenorphine (Suboxone) .................................................................. 14 2.3.2.8 Fentanyl .............................................................................................. 14 2.3.2.9 Over-the-counter (OTC) opioid analgesics ........................................... 15 2.3.3 Precursors................................................................................................. 15 2.4 Patterns of opioid use ................................................................................ 16 2.4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 16 ~ ix ~ 2.4.2 Historical context of opioid use ................................................................. 16 2.4.3 Challenges of identifying drug use, patterns and prevalence ...................... 20 2.4.4 International prevalence ............................................................................ 21 2.4.5 New Zealand prevalence ........................................................................... 23 2.4.6 Summary ................................................................................................... 24 2.5 Opioid availability ..................................................................................... 25 2.5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 25 2.5.2 Treaties, legislation and policy influencing availability ............................
Recommended publications
  • Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2012
    CHAPTER III. ANALYSIS OF THE WORLD SITUATION reported slight increases, however, while other acceding to the other two international drug control countries reported increases in injecting risk behaviour treaties. or low coverage of prevention services among injecting 803. However, the fact remains that nine States in drug users. Oceania have yet to become parties to all three of the international drug control treaties, and this continues to E. Oceania be a matter of grave concern for the Board, particularly in the light of increased reports of trafficking in and illicit 1. Major developments manufacture of drugs in the region. High prevalence rates for the abuse of cannabis and knowledge of illicit 800. The rates of abuse and illicit manufacture of methamphetamine manufacture in Oceania make it an amphetamine-type stimulants in Oceania are still among area particularly susceptible to organized crime. The the highest in the world. This trend is particularly well Board continues to urge all States concerned, namely the documented in Australia and New Zealand, although methamphetamine abuse is reported to be stable or Cook Islands, Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, declining in those countries. While domestic illicit Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, to accede manufacture in Australia and New Zealand is widespread, without further delay to any of the three international the recent crackdown on precursor chemicals used in drug control treaties to which they are not yet parties. domestic manufacture has caused the price of Those States may easily become used by traffickers who amphetamine-type stimulants to rise, which has in turn want to supply the Australian and New Zealand markets.
    [Show full text]
  • DEMAND REDUCTION a Glossary of Terms
    UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.00.XI.9 ISBN: 92-1-148129-5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by the: United Nations International Drug Control Programme (UNDCP), Vienna, Austria, in consultation with the Commonwealth of Health and Aged Care, Australia, and the informal international reference group. ii Contents Page Foreword . xi Demand reduction: A glossary of terms . 1 Abstinence . 1 Abuse . 1 Abuse liability . 2 Action research . 2 Addiction, addict . 2 Administration (method of) . 3 Adverse drug reaction . 4 Advice services . 4 Advocacy . 4 Agonist . 4 AIDS . 5 Al-Anon . 5 Alcohol . 5 Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) . 6 Alternatives to drug use . 6 Amfetamine . 6 Amotivational syndrome . 6 Amphetamine . 6 Amyl nitrate . 8 Analgesic . 8 iii Page Antagonist . 8 Anti-anxiety drug . 8 Antidepressant . 8 Backloading . 9 Bad trip . 9 Barbiturate . 9 Benzodiazepine . 10 Blood-borne virus . 10 Brief intervention . 11 Buprenorphine . 11 Caffeine . 12 Cannabis . 12 Chasing . 13 Cocaine . 13 Coca leaves . 14 Coca paste . 14 Cold turkey . 14 Community empowerment . 15 Co-morbidity . 15 Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Outline of Future Activities in Drug Abuse Control (CMO) . 15 Controlled substance . 15 Counselling and psychotherapy . 16 Court diversion . 16 Crash . 16 Cross-dependence . 17 Cross-tolerance . 17 Custody diversion . 17 Dance drug . 18 Decriminalization or depenalization . 18 Demand . 18 iv Page Demand reduction . 19 Dependence, dependence syndrome . 19 Dependence liability . 20 Depressant . 20 Designer drug . 20 Detoxification . 20 Diacetylmorphine/Diamorphine . 21 Diuretic . 21 Drug . 21 Drug abuse . 22 Drug abuse-related harm . 22 Drug abuse-related problem . 22 Drug policy . 23 Drug seeking . 23 Drug substitution . 23 Drug testing . 24 Drug use .
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Drug Or Alcohol Abuse Or Misuse
    New Trends in Substance Abuse 2018 Lynn Riemer Ron Holmes, MD 720-480-0291 720-630-5430 [email protected] [email protected] www.actondrugs.org Facebook/ACTonDrugs Indicators of Drug or Alcohol Abuse or Misuse: Behavioral Physical - Abnormal behavior - Breath or body odor - Exaggerated behavior - Lack of coordination - Boisterous or argumentative - Uncoordinated & unsteady gait - Withdrawn - Unnecessary use of arms or supports for balance - Avoidance - Sweating and/or dry mouth - Changing emotions & erratic behavior - Change in appearance Speech Performance - Slurred or slow speech - Inability to concentrate - Nonsensical patterns - Fatigue & lack of motivation - Confusion - Slowed reactions - Impaired driving ability The physiologic factors predisposing to addiction Nearly every addictive drug targets the brain’s reward system by flooding the circuit with the neurotransmitter, dopamine. Neurotransmitters are necessary to transfer impulses from one brain cell to another. The brain adapts to the overwhelming surges in dopamine by ultimately producing less dopamine and by reducing the number of dopamine receptors in the reward circuit. As a result, two important physiologic adaptations occur: (1) the addict’s ability to enjoy the things that previously brought pleasure is impaired because of decreased dopamine, and (2) higher and higher doses of the abused drug are needed to achieve the same “high” that occurred when the drug was first used. This compels the addict to increase drug consumption to increase dopamine production leading to physiologic addiction with more and more intense cravings for the drug. The effects of addiction on the brain Nearly all substances of abuse affect the activity of neurotransmitters that play an important role in connecting one brain cell to another.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Trends in Illegal Drug Use in New Zealand, 2005-2007
    RECENT TRENDS IN ILLEGAL DRUG USE IN NEW ZEALAND, 2005-2007 Findings from the 2005, 2006 and 2007 Illicit Drug Monitoring System (IDMS) C.Wilkins M. Girling P. Sweetsur Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation Massey University, P O Box 6137, Wellesley St February 2008 © Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation ISBN 1 877428 07 8 Table of Contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................. 8 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 9 Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction....................................................................................................................................11 Method ...........................................................................................................................................11 Demographic characteristics of the frequent drug users................................................................12 Drug use patterns of the frequent methamphetamine users ...........................................................13 Drug use patterns of the frequent ecstasy users .............................................................................14 Drug use patterns of the frequent injecting drug users ..................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Dextropropoxyphene/Diacerein 41 Precautions the Elderly
    Dextropropoxyphene/Diacerein 41 Precautions The elderly. The elimination half-lives of dextropropoxyphene 3. Haigh S. 12 Years on: co-proxamol revisited. Lancet 1996; 347: As for Opioid Analgesics in general, p.103. and its metabolite nordextropropoxyphene were prolonged in 1840–1. Correction. ibid.; 348: 346. healthy elderly subjects when compared with young controls.1 4. Sykes JV, et al. Coproxamol revisited. Lancet 1996; 348: 408. Abuse. There have been reports1 of the abuse of dextropropox- After multiple dosing median half-lives of dextropropoxyphene 5. Li Wan Po A, Zhang WY. Systematic overview of co-proxamol 2 to assess analgesic effects of addition of dextropropoxyphene to yphene, and some considered that the ready availability of dex- and nordextropropoxyphene were 36.8 and 41.8 hours, respec- paracetamol. BMJ 1997; 315: 1565–71. Correction ibid. 1998; tropropoxyphene made it liable to abuse although it was a rela- tively in the elderly compared with 22.0 and 22.1 hours in the 316: 116 and 656. tively weak opioid analgesic. However, others3 thought there young subjects. In this study1 there was a strong correlation be- 6. Anonymous. Co-proxamol or paracetamol for acute pain? Drug was no evidence that dextropropoxyphene was frequently asso- tween half-life of nordextropropoxyphene and estimated creati- Ther Bull 1998; 36: 80. ciated with abuse, or concluded that, although there was abuse nine clearance. 7. MHRA. Withdrawal of co-proxamol products and interim updat- ed prescribing information. Message from Professor G Duff, potential, it was of relatively low importance in terms of the com- 1. Flanagan RJ, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Opiate Chemistry and Metabolism
    OPIATE CHEMISTRY AND METABOLISM Opiates are any chemicals derived from morphine and codeine, and morphine and codeine themselves. They all have the generalised structure shown below, where X represents either -H, -CH3 or -COCH3. XO O NCH3 XO These chemicals are all pain killers and they all produce drowsiness. Some also produce feelings of euphoria, and they are all to some extent dependence-inducing. For these reasons they are used both medically and illicitly. To determine whether or not one of these drugs has been taken it is important to understand their respective metabolic pathways (the chain of reactions that they undergo in the body) to know which chemicals are indicative of the use of any opiate and which are indicative of the use of an illicit opiate such as heroin. Once this is known then urine samples can be analysed for these chemicals and a positive identification of the starting drug made. Of additional interest to the police is the homebake production of morphine. In New Zealand this is commonly done by a method that results in high 3-monoacetyl morphine levels, whereas South-East Asian laboratories commonly produce heroin with high 6- monoacetyl morphine levels. Thus an analysis of the homebake morphine being used gives information as to where the drug originated. INTRODUCTION The term “opiates” is used for substances, such as morphine and codeine, which are derived from opium, as well as their chemical derivatives. The best known opiates are heroin, morphine and codeine, the structures of which are given in Figure 1. They are all potent narcotic analgesics, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Drug Or Alcohol Abuse Or Misuse
    New Trends in Substance Abuse 2019 Lynn Riemer Ron Holmes, MD 720-480-0291 720-630-5430 [email protected] [email protected] www.actondrugs.org Facebook/ACTonDrugs Indicators of Drug or Alcohol Abuse or Misuse: Behavioral Physical - Abnormal behavior - Breath or body odor - Exaggerated behavior - Lack of coordination - Boisterous or argumentative - Uncoordinated & unsteady gait - Withdrawn - Unnecessary use of arms or supports for balance - Avoidance - Sweating and/or dry mouth - Changing emotions & erratic behavior - Change in appearance Speech Performance - Slurred or slow speech - Inability to concentrate - Nonsensical patterns - Fatigue & lack of motivation - Confusion - Slowed reactions - Impaired driving ability The physiologic factors predisposing to addiction Nearly every addictive drug targets the brain’s reward system by flooding the circuit with the neurotransmitter, dopamine. Neurotransmitters are necessary to transfer impulses from one brain cell to another. The brain adapts to the overwhelming surges in dopamine by ultimately producing less dopamine and by reducing the number of dopamine receptors in the reward circuit. As a result, two important physiologic adaptations occur: (1) the addict’s ability to enjoy the things that previously brought pleasure is impaired because of decreased dopamine, and (2) higher and higher doses of the abused drug are needed to achieve the same “high” that occurred when the drug was first used. This compels the addict to increase drug consumption to increase dopamine production leading to physiologic addiction with more and more intense cravings for the drug. The effects of addiction on the brain Nearly all substances of abuse affect the activity of neurotransmitters that play an important role in connecting one brain cell to another.
    [Show full text]
  • And Other Drugs Asia and the Pacific
    2011 Patterns and Trends of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants and Other Drugs: Asia and the Pacic and Other Stimulants and the Pacic Drugs: Asia of Amphetamine-Type Trends and 2011 Patterns and Other Drugs Asia and the PĂĐŝĮĐ Contact details Global SMART Programme (East Asia) *OREDO60$573URJUDPPH +HDGTXDUWHUV 8QLWHG1DWLRQV2I¿FHRQ'UXJVDQG&ULPH 812'& 8QLWHG1DWLRQV2I¿FHRQ'UXJVDQG&ULPH 812'& 5HJLRQDO&HQWUHIRU(DVW$VLDDQGWKH3DFL¿F Vienna International Centre 81%XLOGLQJUG)ORRU%ORFN% 32%R[ 5DMGDPQHUQ1RN$YHQXH $9LHQQD %DQJNRN7KDLODQG $XVWULD www.apaic.org 812'&ZRXOGOLNHWRVSHFL¿FDOO\UHFRJQL]HWKHIROORZLQJIXQGLQJSDUWQHUVIRUWKHLU FRQWULEXWLRQWRWKH*OREDO60$573URJUDPPH UNODC AUSTRALIA CANADA JAPAN NEW ZEALAND REPUBLIC OF KOREA THAILAND Global SMART Programme 2011 Patterns and Trends of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants and 2WKHU'UXJV$VLDDQGWKH3DFL¿F 2011 A Report from the Global SMART Programme November 2011 Printed: November 2011 Authorship: Global SMART Programme Global team: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Dr. Justice Tettey, Chief, Laboratory and Scientic Section Ms. Beate Hammond, Programme Expert/Global SMART Manager Ms. Alice Hamilton, Consultant East Asia team: Mr. Tun Nay Soe, Ocer-in-Charge, Global SMART Programme (East Asia) Mr. Shawn Kelley, Research Analyst Ms. Supreeya Aksornpan, Project Assistant Mr. Akara Umapornsakula, Web Assistant Mr. Siraphob Ruedeeniyomvuth, Graphic Designer Disclaimer: is document has not been formally edited. e designations employed and the presentation of the material in the document does not employ the expression of any opinion on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area under its authority or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers and boundaries. Patterns and Trends of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants and 2WKHU'UXJV$VLDDQGWKH3DFL¿F 2011 A Report from the Global SMART Programme November 2011 Printed: November 2011 Authorship: Global SMART Programme Global team: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council 1 November 2010
    * United Nations E/CN.7/2010/21 Economic and Social Council 1 November 2010 Original: English Commission on Narcotic Drugs Reconvened fifty-third session Vienna, 2 December 2010 Agenda item 5 Improving the collection, reporting and analysis of data to monitor the implementation of the Political Declaration and Plan of Action on International Cooperation towards an Integrated and Balanced * Strategy to Counter the World Drug Problem Annual report questionnaire: Part Three. Extent and patterns of and trends in drug use∗∗ Note by the Secretariat Pursuant to Commission on Narcotic Drugs resolution 52/12, a meeting of the expert group on data collection was held in Vienna from 12 to 15 January 2010 to review the current data collection tools and collection, collation, analysis and reporting processes. Pursuant to Commission decision 53/2, the Secretariat produced a revised version of the draft annual report questionnaire; the expert group held a meeting in Vienna from 11 to 13 October 2010 to finalize the questionnaire so that the Commission could adopt it at its reconvened fifty-third session. The Secretariat hereby transmits part three of the questionnaire; parts one, two and four will be made available in separate documents (E/CN.7/2010/19, E/CN.7/2010/20 and E/CN.7/2010/22). __________________ * Reissued for technical reasons on 30 January 2012. ∗∗ The present document was submitted after the date required by the 10-week rule as the meeting of the expert group on data collection was held from 11 to 13 October 2010. V.10-57492* (E) *1057492* E/CN.7/2010/21 Annual report questionnaire Part Three.
    [Show full text]
  • Poppy Letter
    April 3, 2019 Scott Gottlieb William P. Barr Commissioner Attorney General U.S. Food and Drug Administration U.S. Department of Justice 10903 New Hampshire Avenue 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Silver Spring, MD 20993 Washington, DC 20530-0001 Frank Yiannas Uttam Dhillon Dep. Commissioner, Food Policy and Response Acting Administrator U.S. Food and Drug Administration U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue 800 K Street NW Suite 500 Silver Spring, MD 20993 Washington DC 20001 Susan Mayne Steven Tave Director Director Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Office of Dietary Supplement Programs U.S. Food and Drug Administration U.S. Food and Drug Administration 5001 Campus Drive 5001 Campus Drive College Park MD 20740 College Park MD 20740 Dear Commissioner Gottlieb, Deputy Commissioner Yiannas, Director Mayne, Attorney General Barr, Acting Administrator Dhillon, and Director Tave: The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a consumer group with more than 45 years of experience advocating for a healthier food system, urges you to take immediate action to stop the illegal importation and sale of contaminated poppy seeds (“unwashed” poppy seeds) and poppy seed pods. These dangerous products can contain high levels of morphine, codeine, thebaine, and other opiate alkaloids. The products pose grave health risks, particularly when the opiates are concentrated by brewing large amounts into a “tea.” The apparently increasing threat they pose has been overlooked for too long as a component of the ongoing opioid epidemic in that addicted patients have been known to use these products as substitutes for other opioids. Contaminated poppy seeds and poppy seed pods pose a serious and immediate hazard to consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • When Good Times Go Bad: Managing 'Legal High' Complications in The
    Journal name: Open Access Emergency Medicine Article Designation: REVIEW Year: 2018 Volume: 10 Open Access Emergency Medicine Dovepress Running head verso: Caffrey and Lank Running head recto: Legal highs open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S120120 Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW When good times go bad: managing ‘legal high’ complications in the emergency department Charles R Caffrey Abstract: Patients can use numerous drugs that exist outside of existing regulatory statutes in Patrick M Lank order to get “legal highs.” Legal psychoactive substances represent a challenge to the emergency medicine physician due to the sheer number of available agents, their multiple toxidromes and Department of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, presentations, their escaping traditional methods of analysis, and the reluctance of patients to Northwestern University, Chicago, divulge their use of these agents. This paper endeavors to cover a wide variety of “legal highs,” IL, USA or uncontrolled psychoactive substances that may have abuse potential and may result in seri- ous toxicity. These agents include not only some novel psychoactive substances aka “designer drugs,” but also a wide variety of over-the-counter medications, herbal supplements, and even a household culinary spice. The care of patients in the emergency department who have used “legal high” substances is challenging. Patients may misunderstand the substance they have been exposed to, there are rarely any readily available laboratory confirmatory tests for these substances, and the exact substances being abused may change on a near-daily basis. This review will attempt to group legal agents into expected toxidromes and discuss associated common clinical manifestations and management.
    [Show full text]
  • Narcan Presentation Text-Only
    Slide 1 Maryland Overdose Response Program Educational Training Program CORE CURRICULUM Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Behavioral Health Administration [email protected] January 2016 Reverse of Great Seal of Maryland] Slide 2 Program Overview • What is an Opioid? • Prevention of Opioid Overdose • Treatment and Other Resources • Recognizing an Opioid Overdose • Responding to an Opioid Overdose • Important Information for Certificate Holders Slide 3 What is an opioid? • Any drugs that contain opium or its derivative • Natural or synthetic • Prescription medications or illegal drugs • Pill, capsule, powder or liquid • Swallowed/drunk, smoked, snorted or injected Slide 4 Opioids • Manage pain, suppress coughs and treat Opioid-use disorders (addictions) • Cause feelings of euphoria, contentment and/or detachment • Effects last from 3 to 24 hours • In excessive amounts, opioids can suppress a person’s urge to breathe Slide 5 Common Prescription Opioids • Oxycodone (OC, Oxy, 80s, Killers, Roxis) o OxyContin o Percocet o Roxicodone • Hydrocodone (Vikes, Hydro, Fluff, Scratch) o Vicodin o Lorcet o Lortab Slide 6 Common Prescription Opioids • Hydromorphone (D, Hospital Heroin, Smack o Dilaudid • Oxymorphone (Mrs. O, O Bomb, Stop Signs) o Opana • Morphine (M, Miss Emma, Monkey, Dreamer) • Meperidine o Demerol Slide 7 Common Prescription Opioids • Codeine (Captain Cody, Schoolboy, Purple Drink) o Tylenol 3 and 4 • •Methadone (Jungle Juice, Chocolate Chip Cookies) • •Buprenorphine (Box(es), Subs/Subbies) o Suboxone o Subutex
    [Show full text]