DOCSLIB.ORG

Secular Stellar Dynamics Near Massive Black Holes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Secular Stellar Dynamics near Massive Black Holes Ann-Marie Madigan Secular Stellar Dynamics near Massive Black Holes PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P. F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op donderdag 16 februari 2012 klokke 11.15 uur door Ann-Marie Madigan geboren te Dublin in 1982 Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof. dr. K. H. Kuijken Co-Promotors: Dr. Y. Levin (Monash University) Dr. C. Hopman Overige leden: Prof. dr. A. Ghez (University of California, Los Angeles) Prof. dr. R. Genzel (Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics) Prof. dr. S. F. Portegies Zwart Prof. dr. S. Tremaine (Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton) This research has been supported by a TopTalent fellowship from the Nether- lands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). for Ev and Dave ISBN 978-94-6191-145-2 Cover design by Dave Madigan vii Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Massiveblackholes ......................... 2 1.2 MysteriesattheGalacticcenter. 2 1.3 Stellar dynamics near massive black holes . 4 1.4 Thesissummary ........................... 7 Chapter 2. The Eccentric Disk Instability 11 2.1 Introduction ............................. 12 2.2 Theeccentricityinstability . 12 2.3 N-bodysimulations ......................... 14 2.3.1 Initialconditions . 14 2.4 Results ................................ 15 2.5 ApplicationtoS-stars . 16 2.5.1 Bimodal eccentricity distribution in disk . 18 2.6 Criticaldiscussion . 19 Chapter 3. Secular Stellar Dynamics 23 3.1 Introduction ............................. 24 3.2 N-bodysimulations ......................... 25 3.2.1 Model of Galactic nucleus . 26 3.2.2 Illustrative simulations . 28 3.3 Statistical description of resonant relaxation . ..... 30 3.3.1 The autoregressive moving average model ARMA(1, 1) . 32 3.4 Interpretation of the ARMA parameters and extension ofparameterspace ......................... 35 3.4.1 Non-resonant relaxation (NR): the parameter σ ...... 36 3.4.2 Persistence of coherent torques: the parameter φ ..... 37 3.4.3 Magnitude of resonant relaxation steps: the parameter θ . 39 3.5 Results: ARMA analysis of the N-body simulations . 40 3.6 Monte Carlo simulations and applications . 44 3.6.1 Angularmomentum . 46 3.6.2 Energy............................. 48 3.6.3 Initial conditions and boundary conditions . 48 3.6.4 Timesteps .......................... 48 3.6.5 Treatmentofthelosscone. 48 viii 3.7Results ................................ 49 3.7.1 Evolutiontosteady-state. 49 3.7.2 A depression in the Galactic center . 50 3.7.3 Dynamical evolution of the S-stars . 56 3.8 Summary............................... 62 3.A Description of N-bodycode..................... 65 3.B Energyevolutionandcuspformation . 67 3.C Precession due to power-law stellar cusp . 71 3.D EquationsofARMA(1,1)model . 72 3.D.1Variance............................ 73 3.D.2 Autocorrelationfunction. 73 3.D.3 Variance at coherence time tφ ................ 73 Chapter 4. Build-up of Stars in the Galactic Center 79 4.1 Introduction ............................. 80 4.1.1 Nuclear star cluster formation . 80 4.1.2 Observational constraints from extra-galactic nuclei.... 80 4.1.3 Evidence from the Galactic center . 81 4.2 Numericalmethodsandscenarios . 84 4.3Results ................................ 88 4.3.1 Evolution of orbital eccentricities . 88 4.3.2 The high-eccentricity statistic . 90 4.4 Summary............................... 94 4.A Statistical constraints on eccentricity from the h-statistic . 96 Chapter 5. Secular Dynamical Anti-Friction 103 5.1 Introduction ............................. 104 5.2 Secular dynamical anti-friction . 105 5.2.1 Increase in orbital eccentricity . 109 5.2.2 Comparison withtheoriesintheliterature . 109 5.3 Numerical method and simulations . 110 5.3.1 Secularhorseshoeorbits . 112 5.3.2 Separation of potential into pro- and retro- grade orbits . 113 5.3.3 Increase in orbital eccentricity of IMBH . 114 5.4 Discussion .............................. 115 Nederlandse samenvatting (Dutch Summary) 119 Curriculum Vitae 123 Acknowledgments 125 1 Introduction Stars near massive black holes move on elliptical orbits which precess slowly, exerting persistent gravitational torques on each other. In this the- sis we present four important consequences of these gravitational torques: 1) A new instability which exposes the inherently unstable nature of ec- centric stellar disks in galactic nuclei, 2) A density depression of stars near massive black holes due to enhanced angular momentum relaxation and tidal disruptions, 3) A signature of high-eccentricity orbits for stars formed by Hills’ mechanism at large radii from the massive black hole, and a directly-observable statistic that can highlight these populations, and 4) A new dynamical process which we call "secular dynamical anti-friction" which boosts the orbital eccentricity of hypothesized intermediate-mass black holes as they spiral into massive black holes. Ann-Marie Madigan 2011 2 Introduction Figure 1.1 – Composite image of the Galactic center (2280′′ 840′′) with the Hubble Space Tele- scope (near-infrared, in yellow), Spitzer Space Telescope (infrared,× in red) and Chandra X-ray Ob- servatory (X-ray, in blue/violet). The bright white cluster at lower middle-right is the location of the MBH SgrA*. Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/UMass/D. Wang et al.; Optical: NASA/ESA/STScI/D.Wang et al.; IR: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSC/S.Stolovy. 1.1 Massive black holes ASSIVE black holes (MBHs) are found in the nuclei of most, if not all, Mgalaxies (Ferrarese & Ford 2005). Embedded in dense star clusters, they dominate the gravitational potential out to their dynamical radius where the mass in stars becomes comparable to that of the MBH. If one understands the dynamics of stars within this radius, one can provide a theoretical framework for some of the most energetic phenomena in the universe such as the tidal disruption of stars and launching of relativistic jets. Compact stellar remnants on high-eccentricity orbits within these clusters, such as neutron stars, white dwarfs and stellar-mass black holes, interact with the MBH producing gravita- tional waves potentially detectable by future space observatories. 1.2 Mysteries at the Galactic center In the center of our Galaxy, at a distance of 8 kpc (Eisenhauer et al. 2003; Ghez et al. 2008; Gillessen et al. 2009), there∼ quietly lives a MBH1. Though highly under-luminous with respect to its Eddington luminosity (Melia & Falcke 2001), its presence is inferred by the effect it has on the orbits of stars that live in the surrounding dense nuclear star cluster. Just as (exo-)planets revolve around their sun, so too do the stars in the Galactic center orbit the MBH on near-Kepler ellipses. 1At this distance 1′′ 0.038 pc. ∼ Secular Stellar Dynamics 3 Figure 1.2 – Left - The central 20′′ of our Galaxy imaged in near-infrared. Right - The S-star orbits: the result of 16 years of tracking∼ the motions of stars around the MBH in the Galactic center. Credit: ESO/Gillessen et al. (2009). Obscuration from interstellar dust in the plane of the Galaxy results in a high optical extinction of 30 magnitudes towards the Galactic center. For this reason, observations of∼ the stars near the MBH are taken at longer, near- infrared wavelengths. The development of near-infrared instruments, adap- tive optics and integral field spectroscopy has lead to dramatic progress in our knowledge of the Galactic center in the past two decades. Angular resolution has improved by more than an order of magnitude to 5 10−4 arcseconds, ∼ × and sensitivity by three to five magnitudes to Ks 16 18, for spectroscopy and imaging respectively (Genzel et al. 2010). Using∼ astrometr− ic tracking of the or- bits of luminous B-stars, astronomers have revealed that the MBH (known as 6 SgrA*) has a mass of M• 4 10 M⊙. The most intensely-studied of these stars is called S0/S0-2; with≃ an× orbital period of just 15.2 years (Schödel et al. 2003) its orbit has been fully traced and shown to be a bound, high-eccentricity Kepler ellipse. The proximity of the Galactic center makes it unique among galactic nuclei in that one can resolve individual stars of different ages and potentially test decades-old predictions of the dynamics of stars near MBHs. One such predic- tion is a lack of young stars near the MBH; its immense tidal force prohibits star formation from the collapse and fragmentation of molecular gas clouds (Sanders 1992; Morris 1993). We do however observe many ( 200) early type stars within the central parsec. They can be separated roughly∼ into two groups. The first is a population of O and Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars, 6 2Myr old, with ∼ ± masses & 20M⊙ (Paumard et al. 2006). The majority form a well-defined, warped disk with projected radii 0.8′′ 12′′, which rotates clockwise on the sky (Levin & Beloborodov 2003; Genzel− et al. 2003; Lu et al. 2009; Bartko et al. 2009). The second population is an apparently isotropic distribution of B-stars 4 Introduction (< 10 100 Myr). Those that lie within the central 0.8′′ are often collectively referred∼ to as the “S-stars”; see Figure 1.2. Their kinematics reveal randomly- inclined and highly-eccentric orbits (Ghez et al. 2005; Gillessen et al. 2009). Their proximity to the MBH, combined with their young ages, are indicative of a “paradox of youth” (Ghez et al. 2003; Eisenhauer et al. 2005; Martins et al. 2008). They could not have formed in-situ, but due to their young ages they have not had much time to dynamically migrate to their current locations. Another prediction is that we would expect, due to gravitational interac- tions, that the population of late type stars in the Galactic nuclear star cluster is dynamically relaxed and forms a steep density power-law cusp around the MBH (e.g., Bahcall & Wolf 1976). However, the late type k-giants, 1 10 Gyr old, do not show a central concentration as is theoretically expected for− a steady- state stellar cusp (Do et al.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Trajectory Design for the Transiting Exoplanet

    1 Trajectory Design for the Transiting Exoplanet

    TRAJECTORY DESIGN FOR THE TRANSITING EXOPLANET SURVEY SATELLITE Donald J. Dichmann(1), Joel J.K. Parker(2), Trevor W. Williams(3), Chad R. Mendelsohn(4) (1,2,3,4)Code 595.0, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt MD 20771. 301-286-6621. [email protected] Abstract: The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) mission, scheduled to be launched in 2017. TESS will travel in a highly eccentric orbit around Earth, with initial perigee radius near 17 Earth radii (Re) and apogee radius near 59 Re. The orbit period is near 2:1 resonance with the Moon, with apogee nearly 90 degrees out-of-phase with the Moon, in a configuration that has been shown to be operationally stable. TESS will execute phasing loops followed by a lunar flyby, with a final maneuver to achieve 2:1 resonance with the Moon. The goals of a resonant orbit with long-term stability, short eclipses and limited oscillations of perigee present significant challenges to the trajectory design. To rapidly assess launch opportunities, we adapted the Schematics Window Methodology (SWM76) launch window analysis tool to assess the TESS mission constraints. To understand the long-term dynamics of such a resonant orbit in the Earth-Moon system we employed Dynamical Systems Theory in the Circular Restricted 3-Body Problem (CR3BP). For precise trajectory analysis we use a high-fidelity model and multiple shooting in the General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) to optimize the maneuver delta-V and meet mission constraints. Finally we describe how the techniques we have developed can be applied to missions with similar requirements.
  • Arxiv:1611.06573V2

    Arxiv:1611.06573V2

    Draft version April 5, 2017 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 01/23/15 DYNAMICAL FRICTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE BINARIES: THE FINAL HUNDRED-PARSEC PROBLEM Fani Dosopoulou and Fabio Antonini Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA) and Department of Physics and Astrophysics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 Draft version April 5, 2017 ABSTRACT The supermassive black holes originally in the nuclei of two merging galaxies will form a binary in the remnant core. The early evolution of the massive binary is driven by dynamical friction before the binary becomes “hard” and eventually reaches coalescence through gravitational wave emission. We consider the dynamical friction evolution of massive binaries consisting of a secondary hole orbiting inside a stellar cusp dominated by a more massive central black hole. In our treatment we include the frictional force from stars moving faster than the inspiralling object which is neglected in the standard Chandrasekhar’s treatment. We show that the binary eccentricity increases if the stellar cusp density profile rises less steeply than ρ r−2. In cusps shallower than ρ r−1 the frictional timescale can become very long due to the∝ deficit of stars moving slower than∝ the massive body. Although including the fast stars increases the decay rate, low mass-ratio binaries (q . 10−3) in sufficiently massive galaxies have decay timescales longer than one Hubble time. During such minor mergers the secondary hole stalls on an eccentric orbit at a distance of order one tenth the influence radius of the primary hole (i.e., 10 100pc for massive ellipticals).
  • Secular Chaos and Its Application to Mercury, Hot Jupiters, and The

    Secular Chaos and Its Application to Mercury, Hot Jupiters, and The

    Secular chaos and its application to Mercury, hot SPECIAL FEATURE Jupiters, and the organization of planetary systems Yoram Lithwicka,b,1 and Yanqin Wuc aDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and bCenter for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208; and cDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3H4 Edited by Adam S. Burrows, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 31, 2013 (received for review May 2, 2013) In the inner solar system, the planets’ orbits evolve chaotically, by including the most important MMRs (11).] It is the cause, for driven primarily by secular chaos. Mercury has a particularly cha- example, of Earth’s eccentricity-driven Milankovitch cycle. How- otic orbit and is in danger of being lost within a few billion years. ever, on timescales ≳107 years, the evolution is chaotic (e.g., Fig. Just as secular chaos is reorganizing the solar system today, so it 1), in sharp contrast to the prediction of linear secular theory. has likely helped organize it in the past. We suggest that extra- That appears to be puzzling, given the small eccentricities and solar planetary systems are also organized to a large extent by inclinations in the solar system. secular chaos. A hot Jupiter could be the end state of a secularly However, despite its importance, there has been little theo- chaotic planetary system reminiscent of the solar system. How- retical understanding of how secular chaos works. Conversely, ever, in the case of the hot Jupiter, the innermost planet was chaos driven by MMRs is much better understood.
  • Discovery of Earth's Quasi-Satellite

    Discovery of Earth's Quasi-Satellite

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 8, 1251–1255 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Discovery of Earth’s quasi-satellite Martin CONNORS,1* Christian VEILLET,2 Ramon BRASSER,3 Paul WIEGERT,4 Paul CHODAS,5 Seppo MIKKOLA,6 and Kimmo INNANEN3 1Athabasca University, Athabasca AB, Canada T9S 3A3 2Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, P. O. Box 1597, Kamuela, Hawaii 96743, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA 6Turku University Observatory, Tuorla, FIN-21500 Piikkiö, Finland *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 18 February 2004; revision accepted 12 July 2004) Abstract–The newly discovered asteroid 2003 YN107 is currently a quasi-satellite of the Earth, making a satellite-like orbit of high inclination with apparent period of one year. The term quasi- satellite is used since these large orbits are not completely closed, but rather perturbed portions of the asteroid’s orbit around the Sun. Due to its extremely Earth-like orbit, this asteroid is influenced by Earth’s gravity to remain within 0.1 AU of the Earth for approximately 10 years (1997 to 2006). Prior to this, it had been on a horseshoe orbit closely following Earth’s orbit for several hundred years. It will re-enter such an orbit, and make one final libration of 123 years, after which it will have a close interaction with the Earth and transition to a circulating orbit.
  • Galaxies at High Z II

    Galaxies at High Z II

    Physical properties of galaxies at high redshifts II Different galaxies at high z’s 11 Luminous Infra Red Galaxies (LIRGs): LFIR > 10 L⊙ 12 Ultra Luminous Infra Red Galaxies (ULIRGs): LFIR > 10 L⊙ 13 −1 SubMillimeter-selected Galaxies (SMGs): LFIR > 10 L⊙ SFR ≳ 1000 M⊙ yr –6 −3 number density (2-6) × 10 Mpc The typical gas consumption timescales (2-4) × 107 yr VIGOROUS STAR FORMATION WITH LOW EFFICIENCY IN MASSIVE DISK GALAXIES AT z =1.5 Daddi et al 2008, ApJ 673, L21 The main question: how quickly the gas is consumed in galaxies at high redshifts. Observations maybe biased to galaxies with very high star formation rates. and thus give a bit biased picture. Motivation: observe galaxies in CO and FIR. Flux in CO is related with abundance of molecular gas. Flux in FIR gives SFR. So, the combination gives the rate of gas consumption. From Rings to Bulges: Evidence for Rapid Secular Galaxy Evolution at z ~ 2 from Integral Field Spectroscopy in the SINS Survey " Genzel et al 2008, ApJ 687, 59 We present Hα integral field spectroscopy of well-resolved, UV/optically selected z~2 star-forming galaxies as part of the SINS survey with SINFONI on the ESO VLT. " " Our laser guide star adaptive optics and good seeing data show the presence of turbulent rotating star- forming outer rings/disks, plus central bulge/inner disk components, whose mass fractions relative to the total dynamical mass appear to scale with the [N II]/H! flux ratio and the star formation age. " " We propose that the buildup of the central disks and bulges of massive galaxies at z~2 can be driven by the early secular evolution of gas-rich proto-disks.
  • Origin and Evolution of Trojan Asteroids 725

    Origin and Evolution of Trojan Asteroids 725

    Marzari et al.: Origin and Evolution of Trojan Asteroids 725 Origin and Evolution of Trojan Asteroids F. Marzari University of Padova, Italy H. Scholl Observatoire de Nice, France C. Murray University of London, England C. Lagerkvist Uppsala Astronomical Observatory, Sweden The regions around the L4 and L5 Lagrangian points of Jupiter are populated by two large swarms of asteroids called the Trojans. They may be as numerous as the main-belt asteroids and their dynamics is peculiar, involving a 1:1 resonance with Jupiter. Their origin probably dates back to the formation of Jupiter: the Trojan precursors were planetesimals orbiting close to the growing planet. Different mechanisms, including the mass growth of Jupiter, collisional diffusion, and gas drag friction, contributed to the capture of planetesimals in stable Trojan orbits before the final dispersal. The subsequent evolution of Trojan asteroids is the outcome of the joint action of different physical processes involving dynamical diffusion and excitation and collisional evolution. As a result, the present population is possibly different in both orbital and size distribution from the primordial one. No other significant population of Trojan aster- oids have been found so far around other planets, apart from six Trojans of Mars, whose origin and evolution are probably very different from the Trojans of Jupiter. 1. INTRODUCTION originate from the collisional disruption and subsequent reaccumulation of larger primordial bodies. As of May 2001, about 1000 asteroids had been classi- A basic understanding of why asteroids can cluster in fied as Jupiter Trojans (http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/cfa/ps/ the orbit of Jupiter was developed more than a century lists/JupiterTrojans.html), some of which had only been ob- before the first Trojan asteroid was discovered.
  • Estabilidade De Veículos Espaciais Em Ressonância

    Estabilidade De Veículos Espaciais Em Ressonância

    sid.inpe.br/mtc-m21c/2018/03.12.13.05-TDI ESTABILIDADE DE VEÍCULOS ESPACIAIS EM RESSONÂNCIA Rubens Antonio Condeles Júnior Tese de Doutorado do Curso de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Tecnologia Espaciais/Mecânica Espacial e Controle, orientada pelos Drs. Antonio Fernando Bertachini de Almeida Prado, e Tadashi Yokoyama, aprovada em 06 de abril de 2018. URL do documento original: <http://urlib.net/8JMKD3MGP3W34R/3QMPS3E> INPE São José dos Campos 2018 PUBLICADO POR: Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE Gabinete do Diretor (GBDIR) Serviço de Informação e Documentação (SESID) Caixa Postal 515 - CEP 12.245-970 São José dos Campos - SP - Brasil Tel.:(012) 3208-6923/6921 E-mail: [email protected] COMISSÃO DO CONSELHO DE EDITORAÇÃO E PRESERVAÇÃO DA PRODUÇÃO INTELECTUAL DO INPE (DE/DIR-544): Presidente: Maria do Carmo de Andrade Nono - Conselho de Pós-Graduação (CPG) Membros: Dr. Plínio Carlos Alvalá - Centro de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre (COCST) Dr. André de Castro Milone - Coordenação-Geral de Ciências Espaciais e Atmosféricas (CGCEA) Dra. Carina de Barros Melo - Coordenação de Laboratórios Associados (COCTE) Dr. Evandro Marconi Rocco - Coordenação-Geral de Engenharia e Tecnologia Espacial (CGETE) Dr. Hermann Johann Heinrich Kux - Coordenação-Geral de Observação da Terra (CGOBT) Dr. Marley Cavalcante de Lima Moscati - Centro de Previsão de Tempo e Estudos Climáticos (CGCPT) Silvia Castro Marcelino - Serviço de Informação e Documentação (SESID) BIBLIOTECA DIGITAL: Dr. Gerald Jean Francis Banon Clayton Martins Pereira - Serviço de Informação
  • 1 Resonant Kuiper Belt Objects

    1 Resonant Kuiper Belt Objects

    Resonant Kuiper Belt Objects - a Review Renu Malhotra Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract Our understanding of the history of the solar system has undergone a revolution in recent years, owing to new theoretical insights into the origin of Pluto and the discovery of the Kuiper belt and its rich dynamical structure. The emerging picture of dramatic orbital migration of the planets driven by interaction with the primordial Kuiper belt is thought to have produced the final solar system architecture that we live in today. This paper gives a brief summary of this new view of our solar system's history, and reviews the astronomical evidence in the resonant populations of the Kuiper belt. Introduction Lying at the edge of the visible solar system, observational confirmation of the existence of the Kuiper belt came approximately a quarter-century ago with the discovery of the distant minor planet (15760) Albion (formerly 1992 QB1, Jewitt & Luu 1993). With the clarity of hindsight, we now recognize that Pluto was the first discovered member of the Kuiper belt. The current census of the Kuiper belt includes more than 2000 minor planets at heliocentric distances between ~30 au and ~50 au. Their orbital distribution reveals a rich dynamical structure shaped by the gravitational perturbations of the giant planets, particularly Neptune. Theoretical analysis of these structures has revealed a remarkable dynamic history of the solar system. The story is as follows (see Fernandez & Ip 1984, Malhotra 1993, Malhotra 1995, Fernandez & Ip 1996, and many subsequent works).
  • The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems

    The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems

    The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems Melvyn B. Davies Lund University Fred C. Adams University of Michigan Philip Armitage University of Colorado, Boulder John Chambers Carnegie Institution of Washington Eric Ford The Pennsylvania State University, University of Florida Alessandro Morbidelli University of Nice Sean N. Raymond University of Bordeaux Dimitri Veras University of Cambridge This chapter concerns the long-term dynamical evolution of planetary systems from both theoretical and observational perspectives. We begin by discussing the planet-planet interactions that take place within our own Solar System. We then describe such interactions in more tightly-packed planetary systems. As planet-planet interactions build up, some systems become dynamically unstable, leading to strong encounters and ultimately either ejections or collisions of planets. After discussing the basic physical processes involved, we consider how these interactions apply to extrasolar planetary systems and explore the constraints provided by observed systems. The presence of a residual planetesimal disc can lead to planetary migration and hence cause instabilities induced by resonance crossing; however, such discs can also stabilise planetary systems. The crowded birth environment of a planetary system can have a significant impact: close encounters and binary companions can act to destabilise systems, or sculpt their properties. In the case of binaries, the Kozai mechanism can place planets on extremely eccentric orbits which may later circularise to produce hot Jupiters. 1. INTRODUCTION views the application of theoretical models to observations of the solar system and extrasolar planetary systems. Currently observed planetary systems have typically Planetary systems evolve due to the exchange of angu- evolved between the time when the last gas in the protoplan- lar momentum and / or energy among multiple planets, be- etary disc was dispersed, and today.
  • Evolution of a Dissipative Self-Gravitating Particle Disk Or Terrestrial Planet Formation Eiichiro Kokubo

    Evolution of a Dissipative Self-Gravitating Particle Disk Or Terrestrial Planet Formation Eiichiro Kokubo

    Evolution of a Dissipative Self-Gravitating Particle Disk or Terrestrial Planet Formation Eiichiro Kokubo National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Outline Sakagami-san and Me Planetesimal Dynamics • Viscous stirring • Dynamical friction • Orbital repulsion Planetesimal Accretion • Runaway growth of planetesimals • Oligarchic growth of protoplanets • Giant impacts Introduction Terrestrial Planets Planets core (Fe/Ni) • Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars Alias • rocky planets Orbital Radius • ≃ 0.4-1.5 AU (inner solar system) Mass • ∼ 0.1-1 M⊕ Composition • rock (mantle), iron (core) mantle (silicate) Close-in super-Earths are most common! Semimajor Axis-Mass Semimajor Axis–Mass “two mass populations” Orbital Elements Semimajor Axis–Eccentricity (•), Inclination (◦) “nearly circular coplanar” Terrestrial Planet Formation Protoplanetary disk Gas/Dust 6 10 yr Planetesimals ..................................................................... ..................................................................... 5-6 10 yr Protoplanets 7-8 10 yr Terrestrial planets Act 1 Dust to planetesimals (gravitational instability/binary coagulation) Act 2 Planetesimals to protoplanets (runaway-oligarchic growth) Act 3 Protoplanets to terrestrial planets (giant impacts) Planetesimal Disks Disk Properties • many-body (particulate) system • rotation • self-gravity • dissipation (collisions and accretion) Planet Formation as Disk Evolution • evolution of a dissipative self-gravitating particulate disk • velocity and spatial evolution ↔ mass evolution Question How
  • Lecture 14: Galaxy Interactions

    Lecture 14: Galaxy Interactions

    ASTR 610 Theory of Galaxy Formation Lecture 14: Galaxy Interactions Frank van den Bosch Yale University, Fall 2020 Gravitational Interactions In this lecture we discuss galaxy interactions and transformations. After a general introduction regarding gravitational interactions, we focus on high-speed encounters, tidal stripping, dynamical friction and mergers. We end with a discussion of various environment-dependent satellite-specific processes such as galaxy harassment, strangulation & ram-pressure stripping. Topics that will be covered include: Impulse Approximation Distant Tide Approximation Tidal Shocking & Stripping Tidal Radius Dynamical Friction Orbital Decay Core Stalling ASTR 610: Theory of Galaxy Formation © Frank van den Bosch, Yale University Visual Introduction This simulation, presented in Bullock & Johnston (2005), nicely depicts the action of tidal (impulsive) heating and stripping. Different colors correspond to different satellite galaxies, orbiting a host halo reminiscent of that of the Milky Way.... Movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhrrcdSjroY ASTR 610: Theory of Galaxy Formation © Frank van den Bosch, Yale University Gravitational Interactions φ Consider a body S which has an encounter with a perturber P with impact parameter b and initial velocity v∞ Let q be a particle in S, at a distance r(t) from the center of S, and let R(t) be the position vector of P wrt S. The gravitational interaction between S and P causes tidal distortions, which in turn causes a back-reaction on their orbit... ASTR 610: Theory of Galaxy Formation © Frank van den Bosch, Yale University Gravitational Interactions Let t tide R/ σ be time scale on which tides rise due to a tidal interaction, where R and σ are the size and velocity dispersion of the system that experiences the tides.
  • Dynamical Friction of Bodies Orbiting in a Gaseous Sphere

    Dynamical Friction of Bodies Orbiting in a Gaseous Sphere

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 322, 67±78 (2001) Dynamical friction of bodies orbiting in a gaseous sphere F. J. SaÂnchez-Salcedo1w² and A. Brandenburg1,2² 1Department of Mathematics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU 2Nordita, Blegdamsvej 17, DK 2100 Copenhagen é, Denmark Accepted 2000 September 25. Received 2000 September 18; in original form 1999 December 2 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/322/1/67/1063695 by guest on 29 September 2021 ABSTRACT The dynamical friction experienced by a body moving in a gaseous medium is different from the friction in the case of a collisionless stellar system. Here we consider the orbital evolution of a gravitational perturber inside a gaseous sphere using three-dimensional simulations, ignoring however self-gravity. The results are analysed in terms of a `local' formula with the associated Coulomb logarithm taken as a free parameter. For forced circular orbits, the asymptotic value of the component of the drag force in the direction of the velocity is a slowly varying function of the Mach number in the range 1.0±1.6. The dynamical friction time-scale for free decay orbits is typically only half as long as in the case of a collisionless background, which is in agreement with E. C. Ostriker's recent analytic result. The orbital decay rate is rather insensitive to the past history of the perturber. It is shown that, similarly to the case of stellar systems, orbits are not subject to any significant circularization. However, the dynamical friction time-scales are found to increase with increasing orbital eccentricity for the Plummer model, whilst no strong dependence on the initial eccentricity is found for the isothermal sphere.