Anti-Piracy Policies & Procedures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anti-Piracy Policies & Procedures Table of Contents Anti-Piracy Policies & Procedures July 28 th , 2009 Privileged and Confidential Not for Further Distribution Confidential Do Not Copy Spencer Stephens Page 1 of 72 Privileged and Confidential Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 Anti-Piracy Policies & Procedures 3 Anti-Piracy Organization Chart 4 Anti-Piracy Approach 5 Anti-Piracy Press Communication Policy 6 Piracy Reporting Procedures 7 AD/PUB & PROMOTIONAL CONTENT 8 Feature Film Material 9 Photography & Still Image Materials 12 Vendor & Partner Security Requirements 15 Appendix A: Security Marking Examples 16 Appendix B: Internal Security Memo Example 17 Appendix C: Confidentiality Agreement Example 18 PRE-THEATRICAL RELEASE ASSETS 19 Production & Post-Production 20 Work Product 24 Vendor & Partner Security Requirements 26 Appendix A: Security Marking Examples 27 Appendix B: FPP Confidentiality Agreement Example 28 Theatrical Release 29 Pre-Theatrical Screenings 29 Release Print Distribution 35 Digital Cinema 37 Exhibitor Anti-Piracy Guidelines 40 Appendix A: Domestic Pre-Release Screening Contacts 41 Appendix B: Hired Security Personnel Post Orders Example 42 Appendix C: International Exhibitor Reporting Procedures 47 Appendix D: Domestic Exhibitor Reporting Procedures 48 Appendix E: World Wide Anti-Piracy Organization Contact List 49 Appendix F: Worldwide Anti-Piracy Rewards & Training Program List 50 Home Entertainment 51 TELEVISION CONTENT 51 Pre-Air Material Distribution 51 NEW THEATRICAL RELEASE CONTENT 52 Format Overview 53 Work Product 54 RSP Distribution 55 DVD-R Distribution 56 DVD Sales Screeners 57 eScreeners 58 DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION 59 Supply Chain Overview 60 Encoding 61 Final Product Distribution 62 Vendor & Partner Security Requirements 63 Appendix A: Visible Burn-In Example 64 Appendix B: DVD-R Request Form 65 Appendix C: DVD-R Distribution Letter 66 Appendix D: Territory eScreener Administrators 67 Confidential Do Not Copy Spencer Stephens Page 2 of 72 Privileged and Confidential Introduction Anti-Piracy Policies & Procedures The Anti-Piracy Group was created to focus on resources aimed to protect our content against piracy throughout the entire value chain, by reacting to emerging piracy trends and to support the creation of innovative offerings to consumers, to compete with piracy. One of the primary goals of the Anti-Piracy Group is to establish and maintain Studio-wide security policies and procedures that ensure content is handled in a secure manner throughout its creation, distribution and marketing cycle, while maintaining a continuous chain of custody to ensure accountability at all stages of the process. The Anti-Piracy Policies & Procedures detail the Studio-wide policies and procedures that have been established with the support of various business units. This is the fifth iteration of the document, which is updated annually to reflect the most current security risks. The Anti-Piracy Policies & Procedures are separated into four distinct sections that address the security risks associated with specific stages of the release cycle. At a high-level, the sections cover: Ad/Pub & Promotional Content – Distribution of feature film, photographic and still image material prior to the theatrical release for advertising, publicity, merchandising and promotional activities. Pre-Theatrical Release Assets – Distribution of feature film content during production, post- production and internationalization (e.g. subtitling) prior to theatrical release. Theatrical Release – Distribution of final prints and digital cinema files for pre-release screenings and general theatrical release. Includes on-site security requirements for pre- release screenings and general exhibitor guidelines. Home Entertainment: Home Video Release – Distribution of assets during the mastering, authoring and replication of DVD and Blu-ray product prior to territory release date. Digital Distribution – Distribution of assets during the encoding and delivery phases for content distributed for EST/VOD and PPV prior to territory home video release date and typically via online/web delivery for both TV and Filmed product. As in years past, abbreviated versions of the document have been created which only include those sections relevant to a particular division or department. This document is confidential and has been uniquely watermarked to the receiving party. It should not be distributed beyond the intended recipient(s) as it contains detailed information about our security procedures. Please direct requests for additional copies, questions or suggested changes to XXXXX . Updated versions will be distributed on an as needed basis as changes are made to the document. As always, management of our assets throughout the Studio is everyone’s responsibility. To this end we thank you for your continued diligence. The Anti-Piracy Team Confidential Do Not Copy Spencer Stephens Page 3 of 72 Privileged and Confidential Introduction Anti-Piracy Organization Chart Worldwide/ Asia Latin America Europe North America Confidential Do Not Copy Spencer Stephens Page 4 of 72 Privileged and Confidential Introduction Anti-Piracy Approach Early in 2008, the Anti-Piracy Group restructured to meet the new challenges created by the changing piracy landscape. The group is now organized around seven main focus areas – Content Security, Technology, Business Intelligence, Enforcement, PR & Education, Public Policy and Commercial Policy. Confidential Do Not Copy Spencer Stephens Page 5 of 72 Privileged and Confidential Introduction Anti-Piracy Press Communication Policy Piracy is a Studio-wide issue; it impacts every area of our business, not just a single business unit. It is important that we handle all domestic and international anti-piracy related requests for materials or other information effectively and with proper messaging and purpose. XXXXX is in charge of worldwide anti-piracy corporate communications and is our central liaison for all related issues. All requests from the press or anti-piracy organizations for materials or participation, including speaking engagements or panel appearances, must be filtered through XXXXX. Policy issues will be coordinated with XXXX and any business unit specific issues will be worked on in collaboration with the business’ PR representative. They are also available to assist with divisional anti-piracy related public relations efforts or educational campaigns. Thank you for your cooperation. Contact Information: Worldwide: Warner Bros. Involvement with Industry PR Efforts: We are an active member of the MPAA Global PR Council, which consists of corporate communications executives from the MPAA and its member Studios. The group oversees all anti-piracy public relations and education efforts in North America. Our PR approach with international markets is based locally rather than globally. Our goal is to help grass roots organizations tackle piracy in their own territories. We offer support, help and guidance to ensure that the issue of piracy is not about the impact on American business alone, but about the impact on everyone’s businesses. This is why it’s important to keep the focus on local initiatives. To that end, the Global Council works closely with the London based MPA EU PR Council, and spearheads Anti-Piracy public relations and educations programs in Europe. It is comprised of European based corporate communications and/or marketing representatives from the Studios and the MPA. The EU PR Council provides advice and assistance to the MPA and to local Anti-Piracy organizations. Confidential Do Not Copy Spencer Stephens Page 6 of 72 Privileged and Confidential Introduction Piracy Reporting Procedures We employ techniques that allow us to narrow down or positively identify the source of most pirated material. We do not expect employees to proactively search the streets or Internet for pirated content. We have internal and hired specialists performing these duties using methods that take into consideration the potential risks associated with obtaining pirated content. However, should you become aware of potentially infringing content, please email or mail XXXXX a copy of the file, web link or physical disc. To provide consistency in reporting and logging of pirated materials, the following procedures should be followed. If any questions arise, please contact XXXXX (contact information below) for assistance. Pre-Theatrical Release Materials If you witness or have knowledge of any piracy incidences or security leaks involving pre-theatrical release date materials, please communicate this as soon as possible to the contacts listed below. Examples that should be reported promptly are: − Theft or illegal distribution of materials (DVD-R’s, tapes, prints, files, etc.) in transport to/from vendors or company offices. − Theft or illegal distribution of materials by a Studio vendor. − Any screening related security/piracy issue, such as camcording or print theft. Contact Office Number Email Internet Media Listed below are examples of the types of Internet infringements that should be reported if you come across them: − Auctions (eBay, Yahoo!, etc.) that are selling illegitimate content. − Spam emails which offer to distribute pirated material. − Any other websites selling or using Studio content in an infringing manner. Physical Media The sale of unauthorized physical media (e.g. DVD-Rs) to the general public is a prominent source of piracy, especially in large cities. Pirated content is often sold by people and in locations that may put the individual purchasing
Recommended publications
  • Šta Znače Oznake CAM, WP, TS, SCR, TC, R5, DVDRIP, HDTV?
    Šta znače oznake CAM, WP, TS, SCR, TC, R5, DVDRIP, HDTV? Ako vas zanima šta tačno označavaju skraćenice za kvalitet filmskog snimka: CAM, WP, TS, SCR, TC, R5, DVDRIP, HDTV, itd., pročitajte ovaj članak. Slijedi tabela kvaliteta filmskih snimaka, koja govori sa kog fizickog medija (kino snimak kamerom, original vhs kaseta, original dvd, itd) je film kopiran, u smjeru od najlošijeg kvaliteta ka najboljem. Tip Oznaka Rasprostranjenost Dosta čest format, mada se sve ređe Cam "CAM" pojavljuje, zbog postojanja DVD rip formata koji je daleko kvalitetniji Snimak filma napravljen kamerom u kinu, a zvuk je dobijen pomoću mikrofona na kameri, tako da se često vide i čuju i gledaoci u bioskopu. Ovaj kvalitet snimka se obično pojavi odmah nakon prve premijere filma u kinima Kvalitet video i audio zapisa je najčešće veoma loš. "WP" Workprint Vrlo rijedak "WORKPRINT" Kopija napravljena od nedovršene verzije filma. Uglavnom fale mnogi efekti i film može da se skroz razlikuje od konačne verzije filma. "TS" Telesync Vrlo čest "TELESYNC" Nasuprot popularnom vjerovanju, kvalitet kod TS video snimka ne mora da bude bolji od kvaliteta CAM snimka. Naziv Telesync ne označava bolji kvalitet VIDEO zapisa, nego bolji kvalitet AUDIO zapisa. Uglavnom je video snimak isti kao i CAM, a audio snimak bolji. Zbog toga se CAM veoma često brka sa TS. R5 "R5" Vrlo čest R5 Line je DVD verzija za region 5. Region 5 čine Istočna Evropa, (bivši SSSR), Indija, Afrika, Severna Koreja i Mongolija. Kvalitet R5 snimka se razlikuje od kvaliteta normalnog DVD-a po tome što je video snimak odličnog kvaliteta (kopiran sa DVD-a), a audio snimak je lošeg kvaliteta (kopiran sa Telecyne snimka, da bi se dobio zvuk originala, pošto je R5 DVD verzija obično prilagođena/sinhronizovana na jezik nekog od tih 5 regiona).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Case: 10-55946 04/03/2013 ID: 8576455 DktEntry: 66 Page: 1 of 114 Docket No. 10-55946 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, TRISTAR PICTURES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLLP, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS, LLLP and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GARY FUNG and ISOHUNT WEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellants. _______________________________________ Appeal from a Decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. 06-CV-05578 · Honorable Stephen V. Wilson PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC BY APPELLANTS GARY FUNG AND ISOHUNT WEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IRA P. ROTHKEN, ESQ. ROBERT L. KOVSKY, ESQ. JARED R. SMITH, ESQ. ROTHKEN LAW FIRM 3 Hamilton Landing, Suite 280 Novato, California 94949 (415) 924-4250 Telephone (415) 924-2905 Facsimile Attorneys for Appellants, Gary Fung and isoHunt Web Technologies, Inc. COUNSEL PRESS · (800) 3-APPEAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Case: 10-55946 04/03/2013 ID: 8576455 DktEntry: 66 Page: 2 of 114 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Index of Authorities ..….....….....….....….....….....….....….....….....…....…... ii I. The Panel Decision Applies Erroneous Legal Standards to Find ..…... 1 Fung Liable on Disputed Facts and to Deny Him a Trial by Jury II. The Panel Decision and the District Court Opinion Combine to ……... 5 Punish Speech that Should Be Protected by the First Amendment III. The Panel Decision Expands the Grokster Rule in Multiple Ways ….. 7 that Threaten the Future of Technological Innovation A. The “Technological Background” set forth in the Panel ……….
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The
    A Framework for Application Specific Knowledge Engines Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Lai, Guanpi Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 03:58:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204290 A FRAMEWORK FOR APPLICATION SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE ENGINES by Guanpi Lai _____________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF SYSTEMS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2010 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Guanpi Lai entitled A Framework for Application Specific Knowledge Engines and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 4/28/2010 Fei-Yue Wang _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 4/28/2010 Ferenc Szidarovszky _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 4/28/2010 Jian Liu Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent
    [Show full text]
  • Index Images Download 2006 News Crack Serial Warez Full 12 Contact
    index images download 2006 news crack serial warez full 12 contact about search spacer privacy 11 logo blog new 10 cgi-bin faq rss home img default 2005 products sitemap archives 1 09 links 01 08 06 2 07 login articles support 05 keygen article 04 03 help events archive 02 register en forum software downloads 3 security 13 category 4 content 14 main 15 press media templates services icons resources info profile 16 2004 18 docs contactus files features html 20 21 5 22 page 6 misc 19 partners 24 terms 2007 23 17 i 27 top 26 9 legal 30 banners xml 29 28 7 tools projects 25 0 user feed themes linux forums jobs business 8 video email books banner reviews view graphics research feedback pdf print ads modules 2003 company blank pub games copyright common site comments people aboutus product sports logos buttons english story image uploads 31 subscribe blogs atom gallery newsletter stats careers music pages publications technology calendar stories photos papers community data history arrow submit www s web library wiki header education go internet b in advertise spam a nav mail users Images members topics disclaimer store clear feeds c awards 2002 Default general pics dir signup solutions map News public doc de weblog index2 shop contacts fr homepage travel button pixel list viewtopic documents overview tips adclick contact_us movies wp-content catalog us p staff hardware wireless global screenshots apps online version directory mobile other advertising tech welcome admin t policy faqs link 2001 training releases space member static join health
    [Show full text]
  • The Motion Picture Association of America's Patrolling of Internet Piracy in America, 1996-2008 by Matthew A
    Content Control: The Motion Picture Association of America’s Patrolling of Internet Piracy in America, 1996-2008 By Matthew A. Cohen Submitted to the graduate degree program in Film and Media Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chairperson: Tamara Falicov Catherine Preston Chuck Berg Robert Hurst Nancy Baym Kembrew McLeod Date Defended: August 25, 2011 Copyright 2011 Matthew A. Cohen ACCEPTANCE PAGE The Dissertation Committee for Matthew A. Cohen certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Content Control: The Motion Picture Association of America’s Patrolling of Internet Piracy in America, 1996-2008 Chairperson: Tamara Falicov Date approved: Abstract This historical and political economic investigation aims to illustrate the ways in which the Motion Picture Association of America radically revised their methods of patrolling and fighting film piracy from 1996-2008. Overall, entertainment companies discovered the World Wide Web to be a powerful distribution outlet for cultural works, but were suspicious that the Internet was a Wild West frontier requiring regulation. The entertainment industry’s guiding belief in regulation and strong protection were prompted by convictions that once the copyright industries lose control, companies quickly submerge like floundering ships. Guided by fears regarding film piracy, the MPAA instituted a sophisticated and seemingly impenetrable “trusted system” to secure its cultural products online by crafting relationships and interlinking the technological, legal, institutional, and rhetorical in order to carefully direct consumer activity according to particular agendas. The system created a scenario in which legislators and courts of law consented to play a supportive role with privately organized arrangements professing to serve the public interest, but the arrangements were not designed for those ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Movie Tags & Meaning of It
    Movie Tags & meaning of it Original Sources CAM - A cam is a theater rip usually done with a digital video camera. A mini tripod is sometimes used, but a lot of the time this wont be possible, so the camera make shake. Also seating placement isn't always idle, and it might be filmed from an angle. If cropped properly, this is hard to tell unless there's text on the screen, but a lot of times these are left with triangular borders on the top and bottom of the screen. Sound is taken from the onboard microphone of the camera, and especially in comedies, laughter can often be heard during the film. Due to these factors picture and sound quality are usually quite poor, but sometimes we're lucky, and the theater will be fairly empty and a fairly clear signal will be heard. TELESYNC (TS) - A telesync is the same spec as a CAM except it uses an external audio source (most likely an audio jack in the chair for hard of hearing people). A direct audio source does not ensure a good quality audio source, as a lot of background noise can interfere. A lot of the times a telesync is filmed in an empty cinema or from the projection booth with a professional camera, giving a better picture quality. Quality ranges drastically, check the sample before downloading the full release. A high percentage of Telesyncs are CAMs that have been mislabeled. TELECINE (TC) - A telecine machine copies the film digitally from the reels. Sound and picture should be very good, but due to the equipment involved and cost telecines are fairly uncommon.
    [Show full text]
  • Scene Releases | for Your Daily Scene and P2P Releases Page 1
    Scene Releases | For your daily Scene and P2P releases Page 1 Scene Releases For your daily Scene and P2P releases Home Forum About Affiliates Apply for Editor Disclaimer DMCA FAQ SGL xXx Website Rules IRC Links Contact Subscribe to Rss Feed WikiRebels - The Documentary The Tourist 2010 Cam XviD – iLLUSiON (Kingdom-Release) AnthraX (1252)December 18th, 2010 | 1:11 pm or 13:11 GMTMovies, Movies - Cam Release Info Release Group: iLLUSiON (Kingdom-Release) ( P2P ) Release Name: The Tourist 2010 Cam XviD – iLLUSiON (Kingdom-Release) Release Date: 18th Dec , 2010 Filename: The Tourist 2010 Cam XviD – iLLUSiON (Kingdom-Release).avi Source: CAM Size: 697.029 MB (730,888,226 bytes) Genre: Action | Drama | Thriller Video: 704 x 302 | 873 Kbps Audio: English | 128 Kbps | 2 ch | Mp3 Subtitles: None Runtime: 1h 35mn IMDB Rating: 6.0/10 RT Critics: 4.3/10 ( 136 reviews) Directed By: Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck Starring: Johnny Depp, Angelina Jolie and Paul Bettany Release Description Revolves around Frank, an American tourist visiting Italy to mend a broken heart. Elise is an extraordinary woman who deliberately crosses his path. Release Quality Associated Links Homepage - Trailer - IMDB - RT - NFO - Search (TPB, Torrent, NZB) Download Links http://scenereleases.info/ 18-12-2010 12:50:02 Scene Releases | For your daily Scene and P2P releases Page 2 Download Single Link ( Hotfile ) ( Fileserve ) ( Duckload ) Online Streaming – Sample 12 Comments Call of Duty Black Ops Update 4 Read Nfo-SKIDROW RuSH (288)December 18th, 2010 | 12:06 pm or 12:06 GMTGames Release Info Release Group: SKIDROW Release Name: Call.of.Duty.Black.Ops.Update.4.Read.Nfo-SKIDROW Release Date: 18th Dec , 2010 Filename: Call.of.Duty.Black.Ops.Update.4.exe Size: 71 MB Genre: First-Person Shooter Published by: Activision Developed by: Treyarch Online Play: 18 Versus/ 4 Co-op Release Description Hear the call of duty once again with this seventh entry in this blockbuster first-person shooter franchise.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. V. Fung
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, No. 10-55946 INC.; DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.; PARAMOUNT PICTURES D.C. No. CORPORATION; TRISTAR PICTURES, 2:06-cv-05578- INC.; TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX SVW-JC FILM CORPORATION; UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLLP; UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS, LLLP; OPINION WARNER BROS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GARY FUNG; ISOHUNT WEB TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding Argued May 6, 2011 Submitted March 21, 2013 Pasadena, California Filed March 21, 2013 2 COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES V. FUNG Before: Harry Pregerson, Raymond C. Fisher, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Berzon SUMMARY* Copyright The panel affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court’s judgment in favor of film studios, which alleged that the services offered and websites maintained by the defendants induced third parties to download infringing copies of the studios’ copyrighted works. Affirming the district court’s summary judgment, the panel held that under Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster Ltd., 545 U.S. 913 (2005), the defendants were liable for contributory copyright infringement on an inducement theory because the plaintiffs established (1) distribution of a device or product, (2) acts of infringement, (3) an object of promoting the product’s use to infringe copyright, and (4) causation in the defendants’ use of the peer-to-peer file sharing protocol known as BitTorrent. The panel held that the defendants were not entitled to protection from liability under any of the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, including safe harbors provided by 17 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pirates of the Oscars: Trends in Piracy Among Oscar Nominated Films Rachel Chiu, Yanli Gao, James Rigby
    Pirates of the Oscars: Trends in Piracy Among Oscar Nominated Films Rachel Chiu, Yanli Gao, James Rigby Introduction Relationship Between First Leak and Box Office Temporal Trends Gross With the 83rd annual Academy Awards just around the corner, we sought to • Not surprisingly, the movies that make more money at the box office • Prior to 2008, all nominated study the piracy trends in movies that have received Oscar nominations in (presumably the more popular ones) tend to be leaked faster than those movies had their retail DVD’s the years since 2003. With slightly over thirty films nominated each year, our that don’t do as well, which is likely due to the higher public demand leaked before Oscar Night for data set gave us 245 movies. The following are the types of leaks we associated with these films. several years in a row. studied: • Despite this trend, the movies that are leaked before they even reach • 2007 seems to have been the • R5: Low quality screener theaters tend to be the ones that don’t make as much money when they peak in number of leaks per • Cam: Video camera in movie theater are released (maybe because people have already seen them?). year, of all types, and since • Telesync (TS): Same as Cam recording but sound is directly connected to then there has been a steady source downward trend of that ratio. • Screener: Pre DVD sent to critics and other professionals prior to release • Steady decline in ratio of leaks • Retail DVD: Final product may be effective intervention Data on the part of the government or perhaps the film studios.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growing Threat of Internet Piracy in the Movie Industry: the Effect of Rapid Pirated Leaks on Motion Picture Revenues
    The Growing Threat of Internet Piracy in the Movie Industry: The Effect of Rapid Pirated Leaks on Motion Picture Revenues An Honors Thesis for the Department of Economics Nicholas Henning Tufts University, 2009 Abstract In 2005, the MPAA claimed that worldwide losses to movie piracy amounted to about $18.2 billion, with $6.1 billion of that missing revenue accounted for by MPAA affiliates alone. The difficulty in measuring piracy is that it is obviously illegal, making data collection and participant surveys skewed in results. In addition, the movie industry is a complex system, and any given movie has a large variability of success factors which amount to unpredictability in the expected revenue of motion pictures. This paper seeks to investigate how the speed of internet piracy affects industry revenues by creating a model for film revenue regressed against the number of days from theatrical release to first piracy leak, first screener leak, and first DVD leak, amongst several control variables. When including control variables, the impact of piracy is found to be negligible, particularly in comparison to the production budget variable. Without these controls, significance is found for days until first piracy leak and screener leak, implying the more days until first piracy leak the lower revenues will be and that more days until first screener leak leads to higher revenues, t(124)=-2.91, p<.01, and t(124)=3.05, p<.01. Finally, scatter plots of the data find that most films which end up making high worldwide revenues are pirated within the first week after theatrical release.
    [Show full text]
  • Bittorrent Search Engines Are an Unlawful Avenue
    Case 2:06-cv-05578-SVW-JC Document 391 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, ) CV 06-5578 SVW (JCx) 11 INC., et al., ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 12 Plaintiffs, ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ) LIABILITY [249] 13 v. ) ) 14 GARY FUNG, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 17 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 21 In September 2006, Plaintiffs1 filed a Complaint alleging copyright 22 infringement against Defendant Gary Fung (“Fung”). [Doc. No. 1.] 23 Plaintiffs’ Complaint contends that Fung operated a file-sharing 24 service as well as related computer servers as a part of an ongoing 25 file-sharing network that profits from alleged copyright infringement 26 1 27 The Plaintiffs in this action are: Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.; Disney Enterprises, Inc.; Paramount Pictures Corporation; 28 Tristar Pictures, Inc.; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation; Universal City Studios LLLP; Universal City Studios Productions LLLP; and Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. Case 2:06-cv-05578-SVW-JC Document 391 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 2 of 46 1 by its users. Plaintiffs then filed a First Amended Complaint adding 2 Defendants Isohunt Web Technologies, Inc. (“Isohunt, Inc.”) and Does 1 3 through 10. [Doc. No. 13.]. (The Court refers to Fung and Isohunt, 4 Inc. collectively as “Defendants.”) 5 Plaintiffs now bring this Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 6 249] on the grounds that Defendants’ users have infringed their 7 copyrights and are liable under theories of inducement, contributory 8 infringement, and vicarious infringement.
    [Show full text]
  • Warez Trading and Criminal Copyright Infringement Eric Goldman Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected]
    Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-18-2004 Warez Trading and Criminal Copyright Infringement Eric Goldman Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs Automated Citation Eric Goldman, Warez Trading and Criminal Copyright Infringement (2004), Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/185 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Goldman, Warez Trading Warez Trading and Criminal Copyright Infringement By Eric Goldman* ABSTRACT Warez traders have been blamed as a significant cause of copyright piracy, which has led to several dozen conviction of warez traders in the past two years. The article analyzes how criminal copyright infringement and other laws apply to warez trading. The article also describes the prosecutions of warez trading, including a comprehensive chart of all warez trading convictions. The article concludes with a brief policy discussion about the problems created by Congress’ effort to criminalize warez trading. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction page 2 2. What is Warez Trading? 3 3. The Criminal Copyright Infringement Statute 5 4. Elements of a Prosecution and Applicable Defenses 6 a. Element #1: Valid Copyright 6 b. Element #2: Infringement 6 c. Element #3: Willfulness 12 d. Element #4(a): Commercial Advantage or Private Financial Gain 14 e.
    [Show full text]