DOCSLIB.ORG

Design-Build Highway Projects: a Review of Practices and Experiences Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design-Build Highway Projects: a Review of Practices and Experiences Final Report Design-Build Highway Projects: A Review of Practices and Experiences Final Report PRC 15-53 F Design-Build Highway Projects: A Review of Practices and Experiences Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 15-53 F November 2016 Authors Jeff Borowiec, Ph.D. Nick Norboge Brett Huntsman Cannon Schrank Wayne Beckerman 2 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 6 Design-Build versus Design-Bid-Build ...................................................................................... 6 Summary of Literature Review ................................................................................................... 6 National Case Study Summary ................................................................................................... 7 Design-Build in Texas ................................................................................................................. 7 New Texas Legislation on Design-Build .................................................................................... 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 10 Definition of Design-Build in Texas ......................................................................................... 10 Notable Facts about Design-Build ............................................................................................ 10 Location of Design-Build Projects in Texas ............................................................................. 11 Overview of Report ................................................................................................................... 12 Literature Review ....................................................................................................................... 13 Key Characteristics ................................................................................................................... 14 Definition of Project Delivery Methods .................................................................................... 15 Design-Bid-Build ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Design-Build ....................................................................................................................................................... 16 Design-Build Variations ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Construction Manager at Risk ............................................................................................................................ 19 Cost Savings .............................................................................................................................. 20 What Is Claimed ................................................................................................................................................. 20 What the Literature Shows ................................................................................................................................. 21 Time Savings ............................................................................................................................. 23 What Is Claimed ................................................................................................................................................. 23 What the Literature Shows ................................................................................................................................. 24 Quality Assurance ..................................................................................................................... 26 What Is Claimed ................................................................................................................................................. 26 What the Literature Shows ................................................................................................................................. 27 Summary of Literature Review Findings .................................................................................. 28 Cost Savings ....................................................................................................................................................... 28 Time Savings ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 Quality Assurance ............................................................................................................................................... 28 Trends ................................................................................................................................................................. 29 Design-Build Projects in Other States....................................................................................... 30 Case Study States ...................................................................................................................... 30 Key Findings ............................................................................................................................. 31 Unique Legislation .............................................................................................................................................. 31 Claimed Benefits ................................................................................................................................................ 33 Design-Build Projects in Texas .................................................................................................. 34 Legislative Authority ................................................................................................................. 35 Contrasting Design-Build and Comprehensive Development Agreement Legislation ............ 36 3 Evolution of Design-Build Legislation in Texas ....................................................................... 37 TxDOT Process for Determining Project Delivery Method ..................................................... 40 Design-Build Procurement in Texas ......................................................................................... 41 Process to Issue an RFQ ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Process to Issue an RFP ...................................................................................................................................... 43 Contract Format ......................................................................................................................... 44 Alternative Technical Concepts ................................................................................................ 45 Summary of Key Findings ......................................................................................................... 46 Cost Savings .............................................................................................................................. 46 Time Savings ............................................................................................................................. 47 Quality Assurance ..................................................................................................................... 47 Procurement Length .................................................................................................................. 47 Impacts on Small Businesses .................................................................................................... 47 Summary of Texas Highway Design-Build Projects ................................................................ 49 References .................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix A: State Case Studies ................................................................................................ 54 Appendix B: Texas Project Summaries .................................................................................... 70 Appendix C: TxDOT Project Funding Sheets........................................................................ 102 4 List of Figures Figure 1. TxDOT Design-Build Project Contracts Executed in 2009–2015. ............................... 11 Figure 2. Project Delivery Method Risk and Control Comparison. ............................................. 13 Figure 3. Design-Bid-Build Project Delivery Method. ................................................................. 15 Figure 4. Design-Build Project Delivery Method. ........................................................................ 16 Figure 5. CMR Project Delivery Method. .................................................................................... 20 Figure 6. Total Cost Change Comparison of Design-Build versus Design-Bid-Build. ................ 23 Figure 7. Comparison of a Typical Design-Build
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dfw Toll Road Guide
    DFW TOLL ROAD GUIDE OPEN TO TRAFFIC PROPOSED/IN PLANNING UNDER CONSTRUCTION Independence Title LEARN MORE IndependenceTitle.com OPEN TO TRAFFIC PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION To order a motorcycle tag, call 1-888-468-9824. A refundable deposit TxTag is required. With an electronic TxTag sticker on Bumper Tags: Bumper tags are required for vehicles with certain your windshield, you can pay tolls windshields. Because bumper tags can be reused, a refundable without stopping at a toll booth or deposit is required. If you have questions, call 1-888-468-9824. digging for change. As you enter or exit the toll road, a device above the How do I get a TxTag? road reads a signal from the microchip Online (txtag.org) inside your tag and automatically deducts the toll from Filling out an online application form takes only a few minutes. Your TxTag will be mailed to you within 3-4 business days already activated your pre-paid TxTag account. and ready for immediate installation. How does TxTag Work? By Phone TxTag makes paying tolls simple and fast. Call the TxTag Customer Service Center Monday-Friday, from 8:00 a.m. There's no stopping or slowing down to pay, no waiting in line at a toll to 7:00 p.m., toll-free at 1-888-468-9824. A representative will assist you booth and no searching for change on toll roads across Texas. The TxTag with the short application process. sticker goes on the inside of your windshield behind your rearview mirror. An electronic reader above the toll roads sends a signal to the By Mail microchip inside the sticker, and tolls are automatically deducted from You may also download and print the application for a TxTag.
    [Show full text]
  • Interagency Transportation Report RTC / Txdot / NTTA / DART / DRMC / DFW Airport / HSR April 2016
    Interagency Transportation Report RTC / TxDOT / NTTA / DART / DRMC / DFW Airport / HSR April 2016 Regional Transportation Council (RTC) Mobility 2040 Plan Approved. After more than a year of effort, the RTC approved a new Regional Transportation Plan at their March meeting. The plan is constrained to the anticipated funding available during the next 25 years and addresses all modes of transportation. In particular, the plan incorporates the consensus designs for the Southern Gateway and I-635 LBJ East projects that are top City and regional priorities, and are scheduled for implementation in the next few years. It also includes a new policy element that offers rewards, in the form of Transportation Development Credits, to local agencies that support regional transportation policies and programs. It is anticipated that the City of Dallas already supports enough regional efforts to qualify for the transportation credits which can be used in lieu of local funds to match federal and state funding for projects in Dallas. Legislative Committee Meeting. The RTC Legislative Committee met in March to get an early start on preparation for the 85th session of the Texas State Legislature in 2017. The overall tone of the meeting was that the region needs to (1) send a message that we are thankful for the work that the Legislature has done to address transportation funding through Proposition 1 in 2014 and Proposition 7 in 2015, and to (2) continue to educate them that additional funding is needed to meet DFW’s transportation needs – either through additional public funds or by providing local decision-makers with additional tools, such as the selective use of toll facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Horseshoe Project NEWSLETTER
    Dallas Horseshoe Project NEWSLETTER Volume 3 • Winter 2014 Construction Progresses into the New Year View of downtown Dallas and Interstate 35E with new bridge structures visible along the highway (bottom right). Signs of construction and progress on the Dallas Horseshoe help minimize traffic impacts created by the project. The Project are becoming more evident on the roadways. Drivers along construction crews are working to build the new structures interstates 30 and 35E can now see cranes and bridge columns first, working from the outside in. Once the new structures rising along the existing highway structures, joining the Dallas skyline. are complete, traffic will be moved onto the newly built The $798 million design-build highway construction project frontage roads and work will begin on the demolition of by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) broke the existing bridges and lanes, and construction of the new ground in April 2013 and construction started shortly after to mainlane bridges. improve traffic flow through the heart of downtown Dallas and This four-year project, expected to be complete by summer the Mixmaster. 2017, includes the construction of the signature Santiago Initial project construction has focused on building frontage Calatrava-designed, Margaret McDermott Bridge over I-30. roads and bridge areas outside of existing mainlanes to Continued on Page 2 www.dallashorseshoe.com 1 Inside This Issue “Construction Progresses” continued from Page 1 In addition to increasing lanes and adding frontage roads Construction Progresses into the New Year ........................1 on bridges over the Trinity River, the new structures will be built 10 to 12 feet higher to allow for raising of the levees Stay Connected On-the-Go with the Dallas Horseshoe in the future and for a potential travel clearance on top of Project Mobile App .............................................................................2 the levee.
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPLETE and CONNECTED CITY CENTER City of Dallas Mayor and City Council the 360 Plan Team Katy Murray, A.H
    DRAFT A COMPLETE AND CONNECTED CITY CENTER City of Dallas Mayor and City Council The 360 Plan Team Katy Murray, A.H. Belo Noah Nelson, Texas A&M Commerce Mayor Mike Rawlings The 360 Plan Chairs District 1 – Scott Griggs Theresa O’Donnell, COD Resilience Office District 2 – Adam Medrano T.C. Broadnax, City Manager, City of Dallas Mike Peterson, AT&T District 3 – Casey Thomas, II Kourtny Garrett, President/ CEO, Downtown Dallas Inc. Joseph Pitchford, Crescent Real Estate District 4 – Dwaine R. Caraway Melissa Prycer, Cedars Neighborhood Association District 5 – Rickey D. Callahan Steering Committee Ben Reavis, Downtown Residents Council District 6 – Omar Narvaez Holly Reed, Texas Central Dr. Jose Adames, El Centro College District 7 – Kevin Felder Cheryl Richards, Dallas Convention & Visitors Bureau Majed Al-Ghafry, COD Assistant City Manager District 8 – Tennell Atkins Scott Rohrman, 42 Real Estate Dr. Lew Blackburn, DISD District 9 – Mark Clayton Jon Ruff, Spire Realty Paula Blackmon, DISD District 10 – B. Adam McGough Jennifer Sanders, Dallas Innovation Alliance District 11 – Lee M. Kleinman Charles Brideau, COD Housing James Schmeltekopf, Wells Fargo District 12 – Sandy Greyson Tanya Brooks, COD Mobility Planning Katherine Seale, Landmark Commission District 13 – Jennifer Staubach Gates Brent Brown, Building Community Workshop Katy Slade, Gables Residential/ Uptown Dallas Inc. District 14 – Philip T. Kingston Dustin Bullard, Downtown Dallas Inc. Neal Sleeper, Cityplace Kryslyn Burks, Communications & Branding, Tracylocke Billy Snow, DISD Partner Organizations Jessica Burnham, Deep Ellum Foundation Kevin Spath, COD Economic Development AIA Dallas Peer Chacko, COD Planning & Urban Design Acknowledgments Sarah Standifer, COD Trinity Watershed Management bcWorkshop John Crawford, Downtown Dallas Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Design-Build Highway Projects: a Review of Practices and Experiences Final Report
    Design-Build Highway Projects: A Review of Practices and Experiences Final Report PRC 15-53 F Design-Build Highway Projects: A Review of Practices and Experiences Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 15-53 F November 2016 Authors Jeff Borowiec, Ph.D. Nick Norboge Brett Huntsman Cannon Schrank Wayne Beckerman 2 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 5 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 6 Design-Build versus Design-Bid-Build ...................................................................................... 6 Summary of Literature Review ................................................................................................... 6 National Case Study Summary ................................................................................................... 7 Design-Build in Texas ................................................................................................................. 7 New Texas Legislation on Design-Build .................................................................................... 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 10
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Qualifications-Corman
    July 25, 2016 Contract No.MO0695172-StatementofQualifications IS 270-InnovativeCongestionManagementContract IS 270 - Innovative Congestion Management Contract Montgomery and Frederick Counties, Maryland Contract No. MO0695172 Statement of Qualifications Prepared by: Original Container 1 of 10 IS 270 – Innovative Congestion Management Contract Montgomery and Frederick Counties TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Cover Letter 1 2. Key Staff Experience and Qualifications i. Design Key Staff 3 ii. Construction Key Staff 13 3. Project Understanding and Progressive Design-Build Approach i. Understanding of Project Goals 21 ii. Design-Builder’s Approach to Progressive Design-Build 25 iii. Composition of the Design-Builder 27 Organization Chart 28 4. Design-Build Team’s Ability and/or Experience i. Design-Build Team’s Ability and/or Experience to be Successful 29 Table of Contents 2. Key Staff Experience and Qualifi cations cations fi 2. Key Staff Experience and Quali 2. Key Staff 2. Key Staff Experience and Qualifi cations i. Design Key Staff IS 270 – Innovative Congestion Management Contract Montgomery and Frederick Counties 2. KEY STAFF EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS i. Design Key Staff • Project Design Manager – Michael R. Holt, P.E., PTOE Years of Experience: 26 (4 with Parsons Brinckerhoff, 22 with others) Education: B.S., Civil Engineering, Clemson University, Registration/Certifications: Professional Engineer: 1990 Maryland (49518); Georgia (25821); Alabama (24265); Professional Affiliations Florida (63152); Louisiana (35451); Mississippi (19769); Intelligent Transportation Society of Georgia: President North Carolina (29666); South Carolina (25866); (2016-2017); Member (1998-present) Tennessee (109010); Texas (106559); Virginia (047811) Institute of Transportation Engineers: President, Georgia Professional Traffic Operations Engineer: (1069) Section (2011); Member (1990-present) Key Qualifications Mike has 26 years of progressive traffic engineering and intelligent transportations (ITS) project experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Guide
    Rochelle Rd. Dallas Love Field Airport UNIVERSITY Lemmon Ave. PARK Cedar Springs Rd. Program Guide .evA ellivneerG .evA Grauwyler Rd. HIGHLAND smarbA .dR 356 Harry HinesMaple Blvd. Ave. PARK The Southern Gateway /Dallas Horseshoe Public Meeting Pioneer Dr. Dallas NorthTollway W. Mockingbird Ln. Thursday, March 27, 2014, 5:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. 356 Irving Blvd. Hilton Garden Inn Shady Grove Rd. 800 N. Main Street, Duncanville, Texas 75116 Trinity River Canada Inwood Rd. IRVING Canada .dR notpmaH .dR Belt Line Rd. Singleton Blvd. MacArthur Blvd. WELCOME! Thank you for attending today’s public meeting. .evA yelkceB .evA The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) • Sign in welcomes you. Colorado Blvd. BNSF Railroad • Review handouts GRAND PRAIRIE 8th St.Corinth St. Union Pacific Railroad Davis St. Davis St. • Visit each station Today’s public meeting is about the Southern Gateway .dR dnaleromtseW .dR • Ask questions Project and the Dallas Horseshoe Project. The purpose FARM 1382 DART • Share your thoughts DART Zang Blvd. of the projects is to enhance the regional and national ROAD Mountain yelkceB .evA Creek Illinois Ave. Walton Walker Blvd. Illinois Ave. Illinois Ave. Union Pacific Railroad Lake • Provide comments transportation system by increasing capacity, reducing .tS kloP .tS traffic congestion, improving mobility, safety and SPUR 303 Kiest improving system linkages. The Southern Gateway Project Ledbetter Dr. Written comments must be postmarked by is located within the cities of Cedar Hill, Dallas, DeSoto, SPUR ellivnacnuD .dR 408 llerkcoC lliH .dR DART Park & Ride Ledbetter Dr. Duncanville, and Lancaster in Dallas County. The Dallas T-RAMP Monday , April 7, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Horseshoe (Dallas)
    2012 TXDOT TOP 10: 6 THE HORSESHOE (dallas) TXDOT DALLAS DISTRICT Providing safe, effective, and efficient movement of people and goods OVERVIEW: The U-shaped $818 million bridge and ESTIMated COMPLETION Date: Late 2016 roadway project near Dallas’ Central Business District is referred to as The Horseshoe Project. TxDOT will replace bridges that cross the D/FW Trinity River on Interstate 30 and I-35E, as well as upgrade the connecting roads just south DALLAS of downtown Dallas. The Horseshoe improves Detail Horseshoe Project FORT safety and increases capacity on these WORTH 170 bridges and roadways, which are central 67 to the vitality of the Dallas economy. By 77 DOWNTOWN St. DALLAS erce contracting with one developer to integrate mm 67 Co design and construction, TxDOT has shaved 30 30 several years from the project schedule and U.S. Post the project is expected to be complete in Office . t late 2016. e 30 v A . Calatrava II 12 y e 77 l k 77 S Riverfront Blvd c e 35E B Houston St HIGHWAY: IH 30 & IH 35 (The Horseshoe Jefferson Viaduc Methodist . Project) (DAL) Dallas Medical Center . 12 LIMITS: IH 35E from N. of 8th street to IH 30 Ave. Sylvan o Blvd. Trinity River d a r and IH 30 from E. of Sylvan to IH 35E) W Colo Greenbelt Park E 67 N Zang Blvd J Lake e f f THE PROJECT: Cliff e r s o n n N 35E Replace bridges that cross Trinity River on B l Kidd Spring v Park d I-30 and I-35E .
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Margaret Mcdermott Bridge Construction Update
    DALLAS HORSESHOE PROJECT Project Update including the Margaret McDermott Bridge Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee February 22, 2016 Agenda 1. Horseshoe Project 2. Purpose and Need 3. Construction Update 4. Margaret McDermott Bridge Construction Update 5. Margaret McDermott Bridge Amended Funding and Maintenance Agreements 2 1. Horseshoe Project I-30: from Sylvan Avenue to west of I-45 I-35E: from 8th Street to Commerce Street 3 1. Horseshoe Project . Replace I-30 and I-35E bridges and connecting roadways that cross the Trinity River . Upgrade outdated roadway geometry . Construct additional lanes . Margaret McDermott Bridge . $798 million – Federal, State, & Regional funding sources. – Local funds contribute to the Margaret McDermott Bridge and the bicycle/pedestrian trails. Design-Build 4 2. Purpose and Need . I-30 and I-35E carry over 460,000 vehicles per weekday . Rated in the 2010 most congested roadways in Texas . Outdated roadway geometry . Bridge deterioration . Increasing costs to maintain & repair 5 2. Purpose and Need- 2010 Texas Top Congested 12TH: I-35E From SH 183 to I-30 15TH: I-30 From I-35E to Loop 12 29TH: I-30 From Hampton to I-35E 16TH: I-35E From US 67 to I-30 6 2. Purpose and Need- Outdated Roadway Geometry 7 2. Purpose and Need- Bridge Deterioration 70 65 60 Rating 55 50 Sufficiency 45 40 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Inspection Years IH 30 WB IH 30 EB IH 35E SB IH 35E NB 8 2. Purpose and Need- Bridge Deterioration I-30 Bridge Deck Repairs 9 2. Purpose and Need- Bridge Deterioration I-35E Bridge Substructure I-35E Bridge Joint at Main Span 10 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Mcdermott Bridge Release Edited
    Press Release NEW DALLAS LANDMARK REACHES MAJOR MILESTONE First Arch of Santiago Calatrava-Designed Margaret McDermott Bridges Tops Off New York, NY (September 2, 2015) – On Saturday, August 22, the first arch of the Santiago Calatrava-designed Margaret McDermott Bridges was completed, marking a significant milestone in the Dallas-Fort Worth region’s Horseshoe Project. Located in Dallas, the Margaret McDermott Bridges are a major component of the city’s urban revitalization efforts, linking the city’s two riverbanks to ultimately transform the Trinity River into a central gathering place. Today, the Eastbound Bridge Arch soars 275 feet above Interstate 30, a critical thoroughfare at the heart of the project. The two arches and roadway extensions are set to be completed during the summer of 2017. The last arch piece, which was lifted roughly 28 stories on August 22, is approximately 1024 feet long and weighs about 200 tons. These new routes over the Margaret McDermott Bridge will provide pedestrians, bicyclists and cars access over the Trinity River. The Bridge, which costs $113 million, is part of the enormous $798 million Dallas Horseshoe Project, which tackles both the city’s infrastructure needs and improves traffic flow to the heart of Dallas’ downtown. When the project is complete, drivers will have a safer, larger roadway with more mobility through the city’s center. Improvements include widening Interstate 30 and I-35E to have 13 lanes and 10 shoulders. This comes at a time when far too many cities and states are not investing in their roadways and bridges. The Margaret McDermott Bridge is set to have a steel arch span of roughly 1200 feet, the fourth longest arch span in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • New Ramp to Westbound I-30 Opens May 1, Closes Left Exit Along Southbound I-35E
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, April 28, 2016 Media Contacts: Dianne Tordillo Katrina Keyes Public Information Specialist Public Relations Director [email protected] [email protected] 214-562-2319 214-403-2583 New Ramp to Westbound I-30 Opens May 1, Closes Left Exit Along Southbound I-35E DALLAS – A major ramp along southbound I-35E to access westbound I-30 will open on the right side of the main lanes on Sunday, May 1, weather permitting. The old left exit to westbound I-30 will be permanently closed at this time. This new southbound I-35E ramp to westbound I-30 will accommodate two lanes of traffic, and will also reopen the Riverfront Boulevard on-ramp to westbound I-30. Map Attachment: - more - Traffic leaving downtown Dallas will no longer be able to access westbound I-30 from the on-ramp just west of Houston Street (along Elm Street at Dealey Plaza). Instead, drivers will need to remain left towards Commerce Street and detour to Riverfront Boulevard to access the new westbound I-30 Riverfront Boulevard on-ramp. Along westbound I-30 in the Canyon area, traffic will be shifted to the right onto new pavement approaching the Mixmaster. Nightly various lane closures along westbound I-30 and southbound I-35E in the Mixmaster will take place on the evenings of Friday, April 29 and Saturday, April 30 to perform the work. Message boards and signs will be placed along the roadway to advise motorists of any associated closures and new traffic movements. The public can stay up-to-date about traffic closures and changes by signing up for Text Alerts, sending the message “dallashorseshoe” to 31996.
    [Show full text]
  • Horseshoe Project Tracker
    DALLAS DISTRICT HORSESHOE PROJECT “Through collaboration and leadership, we deliver a safe, reliable, and integrated TxDOT PROJECT TRACKER transportation system that enables the movement of people and goods.” OVERVIEW The Horseshoe Project will improve traffic flow in the heart of downtown Dallas. The $798 million project will replace the I-30 and I-35E bridges that cross the Trinity River, as well as reconstruct the interchange. The project will also feature the construction of the Margaret McDermott Bridge, Dallas’ second signature bridge designed by Santiago Calatrava. The project was aptly dubbed the “Horseshoe Project” due to its U-shape (see map) and has been given the highest priority due to the increasing bridge maintenance costs. Within the project limits, I-30 and I-35E carry more than 460,000 vehicles per week day ranking it the 20 most congested roadways in Texas. There is rapid deterioration of bridges built in the 1930s and 1950s which has led to increasing maintenance and repair costs in recent years. Local stakeholders raised the priority to develop a financially attainable solution that addressed the safety Pictured above: An aerial view of the Horseshoe Project looking east toward downtown and congestion concerns. Dallas of the new I-30/I-35E interchange. PROJECT HISTORY build” authorization as well as additional FUNDING • Sept. 2012 – Federal Environmental Proposition 12 funding. Prop 12 (P2 PE/ROW; P2 TMA; P2 $604.7 M Bridge: P1 Anticipated) Clearance The new tools provide the opportunity • Oct. 2012 – Receive Final Proposals to close the project funding gap and Prop 14 $7.0 M • Nov.
    [Show full text]