DOCSLIB.ORG

Pheasant Branch Creek Corridor Restoration and Improvements Master Plan City of Middleton, WI | May 31, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pheasant Branch Creek Corridor Restoration and Improvements Master Plan City of Middleton, WI | May 31, 2019 Proposal for consulting services: Pheasant Branch Creek Corridor Restoration and Improvements Master Plan City of Middleton, WI | May 31, 2019 with: May 31, 2019 Mark Wegner Assistant Director of Public Lands, Recreation and Forestry – Forestry & Conservancy Lands City of Middleton 7426 Hubbard Avenue Middleton, WI 53562 Dear Mr. Wegner: Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City of Middleton in developing a Master Plan for the Pheasant Branch corridor. I have enjoyed the corridor and Conservancy with my family for many years. The City and its residents clearly see the system as an important asset in the heart of the community, and I am excited by the vision to develop a master plan to manage the corridor in a holistic, sustainable manner. The 2018 flood resulted in substantial damage to Pheasant Branch. Pedestrian bridges washed out, many stream banks and valley walls eroded, and sediment covered paths and filled portions of the floodplain with multiple feet of sand. The City exerted significant effort to make the corridor usable again for residents, but the geomorphic impacts of the flood event are still evident today. Developing a Master Plan for Pheasant Branch will require a geomorphic approach and the perspective of experienced practitioners. By understanding how the valley has evolved and sediment is distributed, it is possible to plan projects that lead to a resilient, sustainable corridor. Practitioners with experience in stream restoration, bank stabilization, pedestrian path design, and landscape ecology can plan effective solutions. We can help the City meet management goals by creating a plan for the stream corridor. We can deliver a high-quality Master Plan efficiently due to our small size, open schedule, and both project management and technical skills. We have specific expertise in studying, designing and monitoring stream restoration projects in urban environments with strong interests from various user groups. For this project, I will provide geomorphic assessment and engineering design services. I have focused my career on stream restoration and management and have been involved in numerous projects similar to this one. Ben Yahr of Resolution Studio will provide landscape architecture services to assist with design plans. We recently worked closely together on a similar river corridor planning project in Milwaukee. Following the study, we developed final designs that integrated a dynamic river corridor with numerous infrastructure components in a well-used park. Our collaboration experience will result in streamlined project delivery. The attached document describes our project understanding and approach. Our proposed scope of work, budget, references, and résumés are also attached. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or for clarifications. Best regards, Ben Lee Fish Creek Restoration LLC 4321 Upland Drive Madison, Wisconsin 53705 608-977-1856 www.healthystreams.com Proposal for: Pheasant Branch Creek Corridor Restoration and Improvement Master Plan Submitted to: Submitted by: City of Middleton Fish Creek Restoration LLC Mark Wegner Ben Lee, PE Assistant Director of Public Lands, Recreation and Manager/Senior Water Resources Engineer Forestry [email protected] 7426 Hubbard Avenue (608) 977-1856 Middleton, WI 53562 Table of Contents About Us ................................... 1 Project Understanding .................. 2 Project Approach ........................ 4 References ................................ 5 Scope of Work ............................ 6 Schedule & Budget ...................... 9 Itemized Deliverable List ............ 10 Relevant Experience .................. 11 Resumes ................................. 14 Proposal – Pheasant Branch Master Planning 1 About Us Fish Creek Restoration LLC Fish Creek Restoration LLC (FCR) grew out of a passion to restore river ecosystems. Ben Lee, the manager of Fish Creek Restoration LLC, first developed an interest in river restoration during college. His first hands-on experience with stream FCR Areas of Expertise restoration was in North Fish Creek, a tributary to Lake Superior in Wisconsin. Due to changing land • Stream restoration design use and modification of the river, the system • Stream bank and bluff stabilization experienced significant degradation. The legacy of • Geomorphic assessments & project these impacts remains profound today, as does Ben’s prioritization desire to improve the health of our rivers and • 1D & 2D Hydraulic modeling streams. It was in Fish Creek that Ben’s interest in • Aquatic habitat enhancement stream restoration was rooted. That interest became a passion, and it is why Ben founded Fish Creek Restoration LLC - to maximize stream ecosystem functions through sound river engineering design. We are experts in stream restoration projects, including planning and prioritizing stream projects. Our work is founded on an understanding of the physical processes that shape rivers, and an understanding of how river ecosystems have evolved to deal with the dynamics of moving water and sediment. Creating healthy aquatic ecosystems begins with emulating natural stream forms and processes. Resolution Studio For this project, we have teamed with Resolution Studio, LLC (RS). RS is a small business providing landscape architecture, remote sensing, visual RS Areas of Expertise communication, and restoration ecology services to public and private clients throughout the Great Lakes • Design of public and private sites region. RS is based in Madison, Wisconsin; and was • Site investigation, inventory & analysis founded in 2016. They combine aerial data collected • Ecological vegetation planning, O&M with small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS drones) • Green infrastructure, sustainable/LID with spatial design process to communicate ideas • Public outreach about how to bring people to nature, and nature to • CAD, GIS, 3d rendering & visualization people at all phases of site design – from project inception to post-construction monitoring. Fish Creek Restoration LLC 1 Proposal – Pheasant Branch Master Planning 2 Project Understanding The 2018 flood event caused significant damage in the Pheasant Branch corridor. Extensive erosion delivered a large volume of sediment and woody material downstream, resulting in a multitude of issues. The sediment covered the multi-use path and floodplain with several feet of material in many locations. Though the sediment was removed from the paths to make them usable again, it remains in place elsewhere in the floodplain. Invasive species often take over these disturbed areas. Additionally, sedimentation has reduced connectivity between the channel and floodplain resulting in reduced flood storage. The deposits have also resulted in taller streambanks that are susceptible to future erosion due to a lack of vegetation. Trees were undermined during the flood event and were transported downstream where they were caught on bridge crossings. All the pedestrian bridges in the corridor were dislodged and had to be reset. Following the 2018 flood, the City contracted with Cardno to assess the damage in the corridor and prioritize repair work. Cardno was previously contracted by the City to design bank stabilization and restoration projects before the flood. Cardno’s final recommendations included increasing “flood flow capacity,” creating “bankfull benches and floodplain access,” and realigning “the stream channel… away from existing steep slopes.” In addition, Cardno recommended removing “shallow rooted tree species,” increasing the capacity of stream crossings, and using integrated bank treatments for bank stability. Figure 1. Erosion downstream of Park Street. The City also worked with the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Planning and Landscape Architecture program to create a report on resilience and recovery in the stream corridor. The program designed a class around the project with the purpose of creating the final report, “Reimagining the Unimaginable: The August 2018 Pheasant Branch Flooding in Middleton, WI.” The students identified several issues that could help the City recover and build a more resilient stream, including changing ordinances and infrastructure, transforming the vegetation community in the corridor, and slowing runoff elsewhere in the watershed. Using these studies as a foundational guide, the City is looking to develop a Master Planning document to guide restoration work in the Pheasant Branch corridor. The City reached out to the community of Boulder, Colorado to understand how they responded to the 2013 Colorado Front Range Floods. The City was referred to the “Boulder Creek Restoration Master Plan.” The study involved field assessments of the geomorphic and ecological conditions, background information review, and multiple public meetings. Using the data obtained, a set of alternatives were developed Fish Creek Restoration LLC 2 Proposal – Pheasant Branch Master Planning to guide general stream restoration efforts in the hope of improving resilience of the stream. The Boulder Creek document served as a reference as the City developed a request for proposals for Master Planning in the Pheasant Branch Corridor. For the Pheasant Branch, the City has requested a plan that guides restoration efforts that integrate with the multi-use path and other infrastructure. The City would like to consider changing the B A C Figure 2. Damage in the Pheasant Branch corridor. Bluff erosion (A) delivered large volumes of sediment that were deposited throughout the floodplain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oral History and Archaeology of the Keith's Siding Site Location Amanda Kay Flannery University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations December 2013 Oral History and Archaeology of the Keith's Siding Site Location Amanda Kay Flannery University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Flannery, Amanda Kay, "Oral History and Archaeology of the Keith's Siding Site Location" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 283. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/283 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORAL HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE KEITH’S SIDING SITE LOCATION by Amanda Flannery A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee December 2013 ABSTRACT ORAL HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE KEITH’S SIDING SITE LOCATION by Amanda Flannery The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013 Under the Supervision of Dr. Patricia Richards At the beginning of the 20th century railroad logging camp settlements dotted the landscape in Northern Wisconsin in order to supply growing city populations and immigrants moving west with building materials. Many temporary towns were created in order to house the workers and their families and provide basic amenities needed to survive in an isolated environment. These communities typically lasted until the extraction of the hardwood was complete and then communities would abandon their makeshift dwellings and move on to the next stand of trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolf River State Trail Feasibility Study EA
    Feasibility Study and Environmental Analysis Wolf River State Trail (Crandon to White Lake State Trail) July 2006 A report to the Natural Resources Board prepared by: Planning Strategies 1133 E. Dayton Street Madison, WI 53703 (608)256-1213 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: THE FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS.. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 2 PART ONE: FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE CRANDON LINE ...................................... 3 PROPOSAL.................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Description................................................................................................................. 3 Property Designation.............................................................................................................. 3 Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................................. 3 Management............................................................................................................................ 4 NEED ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Recreational Needs ................................................................................................................. 5 Trail Network.........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WILLOW FLOWAGE SCENIC WATERS AREA! Leaving for a Short Time, Be Certain the Fire Share Their Plans with Friends Or Relatives Young Aspen Forests
    FOREST MANAGEMENT CAMPING CAMPING REGULATIONS The forests of Willow Flowage are managed The Willow Flowage offers 37 remote, semi- Group Campsites • There is a 10-day camping limit at all to highlight sustainable forestry best primitive campsites (30 family sites and There are seven campsites. Campers must occupy a site the practices, protect wildlife, emphasize seven group sites) along the shoreline and on group campsites day they set up camp, and may not leave the forest diversity and promote a natural and islands. All sites are available on a first-come, each with two fire site unoccupied for more than one night aesthetically pleasing appearance. first-served basis. No fees or registration are rings, two picnic thereafter. Leaving unattended camping required to use the sites. Campsites may tables and two box equipment to save a site is not allowed. Photo Credit: Gary Cira A buffer of aspen, balsam fir, birch, maple be closed temporarily (or permanently) to latrines. Group • Camping is allowed in designated campsites and scattered pine around the shoreline protect sensitive, threatened or endangered campsites may be only (see map). Campers may not establish gives the Willow Flowage a wild, scenic species and their habitats. Occasional occupied by up to new campsites. Each designated site has a appearance from the water. Future thinning campsite main tenance may also require 15 people. fire ring, picnic table and box latrine. Potable water is not available at the of selected trees will eventually restore temporary closures. All campsites are • Power equipment (e.g., chainsaw or campsites. Campers must bring their own the shoreline to older forest conditions accessible by watercraft.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA July 22, 2008 10:00 A.M
    AGENDA July 22, 2008 10:00 A.M. Board of Commissioners of Public Lands 125 S. Webster Street, Room 200 Madison, Wisconsin 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Minutes – July 1, 2008 3. Approve Loans 4. Loan Limit Exception – City of Green Bay 5. Proposed Land Bank Sales to the DNR A. Swamp Creek Fen B. Crandon Ribbed Fen C. Edith Lake D. Brule River State Forest E. Turtle Flambeau Flowage F. Willow Flowage 6. Proposed Land Bank Purchase from Patrick Phalen 7. Adjourn State of Wisconsin Board of Commissioners of Public Lands BOARD MEETING JULY 22, 2008 AGENDA ITEM 2 APPROVE MINUTES Attached for approval are the minutes from the July 1, 2008, board meeting. State of Wisconsin Board of Commissioners of Public Lands Board Meeting Minutes July 1, 2008 ITEM 1. CALL TO ORDER Board Chair La Follette called the meeting of the Board of Commissioners of Public Lands to order at 2:00 p.m. Present were: Doug La Follette, Board Chair Secretary of State Dawn Marie Sass, Commissioner State Treasurer J.B. Van Hollen, Commissioner Attorney General Tia Nelson, Executive Secretary Board of Commissioners of Public Lands Tom German, Deputy Secretary Board of Commissioners of Public Lands Coletta DeMuth, Loan Analyst Board of Commissioners of Public Lands Bob Hunter, Assistant Attorney General WI Department of Justice ITEM 2. APPROVE MINUTES – June 24, 2008 MOTION: Commissioner Sass moved to approve the minutes; Commissioner Van Hollen seconded the motion. The motion passed, 3-0. ITEM 3. APPROVE LOANS Board Chair La Follette asked if the loans had received legal review.
    [Show full text]
  • North Central Forest Ecological Landscape
    North Central Forest ecological landscape Attributes and Characteristics Legacy Places Running across much of northern Wisconsin, this ecological landscape encompasses what BD Bad River PG Penokee - Gogebic many residents refer to as the “north woods.” BR Black River Range Lying on top of the end and ground moraine left Blue Hills PA Pershing Area by the glaciers about 12,000 years ago, these vast BI Peshtigo River northern hardwood forests support a variety of BL Border Lakes Region PE wildlife, including many that need large blocks CN Chequamegon - Nicolet PP Pine - Popple River of habitat to survive. Although there are very National Forests PI Pipestone Hills few large lakes on this ground moraine, many large wetlands, small creeks, rivers, and small CH Chippewa Flowage PR Prairie River kettle lakes occur throughout. Soils are primarily CL Chippewa Glacial Lakes SO Somo River acid silt loams, often rocky, and poorly drained. Deerskin River Thornapple - Brunet Areas of loam and loamy sand are also present. DK TP River Woods Many of the state’s major rivers, such as the EC East and West Branches Flambeau, Chippewa, Wolf, Peshtigo, and Brule- of the Eau Claire River TH Timm’s Hill Menominee rivers, originate in the North Central ER Eau Claire River TF Turtle - Flambeau Forest. The exceptional water quality and aquatic FR Flambeau River State Forest Flowage GF Gile Flowage UC Upper Chippewa Lake Superior River Superior GM Goodman Forest BAYFIELD UF Upper Forks of the T QUEEN R MT HH Harrison Hills DOUGLAS Flambeau River ROBE Michigan BD
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Water Quality Restoration and Protection Prioritization Framework
    Wisconsin’s Water Quality Restoration and Protection Prioritization Framework Final Draft Clean Water Act Section 303(d) Long-Term Vision Implementation of the Priority Goal for Total Maximum Daily Load or Alternative Plan Development Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Water Quality and Watershed Management Bureaus July 27, 2015 dnr.wi.gov wisconsin.gov Wisconsin’s Water Quality Restoration and Protection Prioritization Framework Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Prioritization Minimum Elements ........................................................................................................ 3 Description of Changes from Past Prioritization Scheme ............................................................. 3 Mechanism for Restoration Area Prioritization ............................................................................... 4 Mechanism for Protection Area Prioritization ................................................................................. 4 Factors Considered in Prioritization .................................................................................................. 5 Consideration of EPA National and Regional Priorities ................................................................ 6 Ongoing Restoration and Protection Planning Work ................................................................... 6 Approach for Changes to Priorities ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Order of the State of Wisconsin Natural Resources Board Renumbering, Amending and Creating Rules
    ORDER OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN NATURAL RESOURCES BOARD RENUMBERING, AMENDING AND CREATING RULES The Wisconsin Natural Resources Board proposes an order to renumber NR 102.10(1)(f)1. and NR 102.11(1)(d)1.; amend NR 102.10(1)(f)1t., 3., 8., 13., 18., 20., 22. and 23., 102.11(1)(d)29.; and to create NR 102.10(1)(f)1d., 1h., 1p., 2d., 2h., 2p., 5m., 6m., 7m., 10m., 15e., 15m., 15s., 20m., 21g., 21r., 22m., 23m., 102.11(1)(d)1g., 1r., 15m., 25m., 26c., 26n., 26r., 26w., 31m., 35m. and 38m. relating to the designation of waters as outstanding or exceptional resource waters. WT-44-05 Analysis Prepared by Department of Natural Resources Statutory Authority and Explanation: The statute that authorizes the promulgation of this order is s. 281.15, Stats. This section grants rule-making authority to the Department to set standards of water quality applicable to waters of the state. Statutes Interpreted: Section 281.15, Stats., directs the Department to establish water quality standards for all waters of the state. Section 281.11, Stats., directs that water quality standards for those rivers emptying into Lake Superior and Michigan and Green Bay shall be as high as practicable. Related Statute or Rule: Chapter NR 102 contains water quality standards for Wisconsin surface waters. This chapter identifies an antidegradation policy that states that waters of the state shall not be lowered in quality, unless appropriately justified. Outstanding and Exceptional Resource waters are identified as categories within the antidegradation policy. Plain Language Rule Analysis: In 1989, a new antidegredation policy was adopted in Wisconsin, in response to federal Clean Water Act requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Rush Creek Watershed (Bl01)
    State of the Bad Axe-La Crosse Basin Report 2002 CHAPTER 4: INDIVIDUAL STREAM AND LAKE NARRATIVES BY WATERSHED................. 43 RUSH CREEK WATERSHED (BL01)............................................................................................................ 45 Recommendations:................................................................................................................................ 48 References – Rush Creek Watershed..................................................................................................... 58 BAD AXE RIVER WATERSHED (BL02)....................................................................................................... 60 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 63 References - Bad Axe River Watershed................................................................................................. 75 COON CREEK WATERSHED (BL03) ........................................................................................................... 77 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 81 References - Coon Creek Watershed..................................................................................................... 97 LA CROSSE RIVER ..................................................................................................................................... 99 Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • At a Loss: the State of Wisconsin After Eight Years Without the Public Intervenor's Office, 88 Marq
    Marquette Law Review Volume 88 Article 3 Issue 3 Winter 2004 At a Loss: The tS ate of Wisconsin After Eight Years Without the Public Intervenor's Office Jodi Habush Sinykin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Jodi Habush Sinykin, At a Loss: The State of Wisconsin After Eight Years Without the Public Intervenor's Office, 88 Marq. L. Rev. 645 (2004). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol88/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AT A LOSS: THE STATE OF WISCONSIN AFTER EIGHT YEARS WITHOUT THE PUBLIC INTERVENOR'S OFFICE JODI HABUSH SINYKIN* I. INTRODUCTION In the years since its elimination in 1995, citizens and state officials have made a concerted effort to restore the Wisconsin Public Intervenor's Office ("the Office"). The Office was a state entity created in 1967 by Republican Governor Warren P. Knowles to protect public rights in the state's natural resources and to ensure fair play and due process for matters of environmental concern. With every passing year since the Office's demise, the base of citizen and political support for its restoration has only grown larger. The 2003 Assembly Bill 46, seeking the reinstatement of a Public Intervenor's Office with all of the authority and powers possessed by the Office prior to 1995, represents the most current legislative effort in this respect.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Ecological Assessment for the Upper Wolf River Fishery Area
    Rapid Ecological Assessment for the Upper Wolf River Fishery Area A Rapid Ecological Assessment Focusing on Rare Plants, Selected Rare Animals, and High-quality Natural Communities Properties included in this report are: Upper Wolf River Fishery Area Oxbow Rapids, Upper Wolf River State Natural Area Wisconsin’s Natural Heritage Inventory Program Bureau of Endangered Resources Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 February 2012 PUB-ER-835-2012 Acknowledgments We extend our appreciation to Gary Bartz, property manager at Upper Wolf River Fishery Area; David Seibel, Fisheries Biologist; Pam Freeman-Gillen, Forester; Ryan Brown, Forestry Technician; Richard Weide, Wildlife Biologist; Eric Borchert, Wildlife Technician; and Kate Fitzgerald for their support and assistance throughout the project. Funding for this project was provided by the Bureau of Facilities and Lands, the Endangered Resources Fund, and Sport Fish Restoration Funds. Primary Author: Richard Staffen Contributors: Julie Bleser – data management Tyler Brandt – bats Gary Emerson – bats Drew Feldkirchner – report contributions Doug Fields – community ecology, rare plants Bob Hay – herptiles Dawn Hinebaugh – maps Terrell Hyde- zoology data processing, report contributions Christina Isenring – community ecology, inventory coordination, report contributions Heather Kaarakka – bats Ryan Magana – community ecology, report editing Ryan O’Connor – botany and ecology data processing Stacy Rowe – ecology data processing William A. Smith – zoology Elizabeth Slavinski - maps Amy Staffen – report editing Rich Staffen – zoology data processing, passerine birds and raptors Todd Thayer – herptiles Roland Wang – report contributions Paul White - bats Cover Photo: Rocky Rips Rapids at Upper Wolf River Fishery Area. Photo by: Richard Staffen Upper Wolf River Fishery Area 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Data Wisconsin Water Year 1982
    Water Resources Data Wisconsin Water Year 1982 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-DATA REPORT WI-B2-1 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Wisconsin and with other agencies CALENDAR FOR WATER TEAR 1982 1981 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 123 1234567 12345 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 1982 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 123456 123456 3456789 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 28 29 30 31 31 APRIL MAY JUNE S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 123 1 12345 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2345678 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 30 31 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 1234567 1234 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 Water Resources Data Wisconsin Water Year 1982 by B.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring-Summer, Vol. 40 #1&2
    Volume 40 Number 1 & 2 A quarterly newsletter from the Forest History Association of Wisconsin, Inc. P.O. Box 424 Two Rivers, WI 54241-0424 Spring - Summer 2015 Officers and Directors 2014—2015 (2017) (2016) Don Schnitzler Sara Witter Connor President Vice-president 301 S. Cedar Avenue P.O. Box 366 Marshfield, WI 54449 Laona, WI 54541 (715) 387-4044 (406) 249-7781 [email protected] [email protected] Bob Walkner (2017) Bridget O’Brien (2015) Treasurer Secretary 3103 Maplewood Road 1116 Ridge Road Two Rivers, WI 54241 Marshfield, WI 54449 (920) 793-4010 715-387-8897 [email protected] [email protected] David Peschau (2017) Tom Jacobs( 2015) 100 N. Sixth Street, #202 W8367 Moonshine Hill Road LaCrosse, WI 54601 Crivitz. WI 54114 (608) 788-7415 [email protected] [email protected] Robert Brisson (2016) Michael Sohasky (2016) N529 River Drive 1435 Neva Road Menominee, MI 49858-9402 Antigo, WI 54409 (906) 863-6850 (715) 627-4025 [email protected] [email protected] Ed Forrester (2015) 2484 11¼ Street Cumberland, WI 54829 [email protected] Forest History Association of Wisconsin members interested in serving as a member of the FHAW Board of Directors should submit their name, a brief biographical sketch, and contact information to: FHAW Nominating Committee Chairman, David Peschau [email protected] Chips and Sawdust Volume 40, Number 1 & 2 Table of Contents From the President’s Chair………………..…....…….…………….… pages 4 - 5 Chips and Sawdust, Vol. 1, No. 1 (reprinted)……………......………. pages 6 - 7 FHAW Authors
    [Show full text]