DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 163 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2017 No. 186 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was Congress works, what we achieved in lies. That is not what the Speaker said called to order by the Speaker pro tem- 1986 may, in hindsight, appear to have it was going to do. He said he would pore (Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia). been easy. It wasn’t. give everybody a tax cut. That was not f It was difficult because it required true, and is not true. 36 million middle compromise; it was difficult because it class American households will see DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO required trust; and it was difficult be- their taxes go up over the next 10 years TEMPORE cause it required both parties to make as a result of this Republican plan. The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- tough choices and share the burden of And third, the Republican plan will fore the House the following commu- taking responsibility, along with the explode the debt by more than $1.7 tril- nication from the Speaker: benefit of claiming victory. lion over the next decade. This bill is WASHINGTON, DC, Somewhere along the way, Mr. the granddaddy of all debt creators. November 14, 2017. Speaker, it seems that many in the Re- This means that those tax cuts, more I hereby appoint the Honorable JODY B. publican Party lost sight of this truth. than half of which benefit only the top HICE to act as Speaker pro tempore on this First on healthcare, and now on taxes, 1.5 percent, will be paid for by a huge day. they have decided that it would be tax increase on our children and on our PAUL D. RYAN, easier not to work with Democrats at grandchildren. Speaker of the House of Representatives. all, so they have chosen a partisan The late Senator Russell Long from f path, where the only ones with whom Louisiana liked to cite an old ditty MORNING-HOUR DEBATE they have to compromise are them- about who gets stuck with the pain of selves. It is ‘‘going to be easy,’’ they tax increase. He said: ‘‘Don’t tax you, The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- said. don’t tax me, tax that fellow behind ant to the order of the House of Janu- And the result: We now expect, on the tree,’’ meaning, of course, that ary 3, 2017, the Chair will now recog- this floor, a bill so dangerous and so none of the voters want a tax increase, nize Members from lists submitted by reprehensible to the taxpayers of this so if you raise taxes, make sure it is the majority and minority leaders for country that nearly every major orga- someone else who is out of sight and morning-hour debate. nization representing taxpayers, small out of mind. The Chair will alternate recognition businesses, workers, farmers, seniors, In this case, sadly, Mr. Speaker, that between the parties. All time shall be home builders, realtors, teachers—and fellow behind the tree is a child. This is equally allocated between the parties, I could go on—oppose this bill. a tax increase on all those children. It and in no event shall debate continue There are more serious problems is a child who can’t vote and doesn’t beyond 11:50 a.m. Each Member, other with the Republican tax bill than time have a voice in this debate. than the majority and minority leaders to address them on this floor, so I want The Republican plan asks Members and the minority whip, shall be limited to highlight the three that make it so to pile $1.7 trillion or more of debt onto to 5 minutes. utterly dangerous to our economy and our children and grandchildren and put f to the middle class. the fiscal sustainability of our country First, most of the benefits of the tax at further risk. When confronted with GOP TAX BILL cuts Republicans are proposing will this fact, we heard only the same argu- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The benefit only those at the very top 1 ments we heard in 2001 and 2003, before Chair recognizes the gentleman from percent; the 99 percent left behind. Ac- the last major Republican effort to cut Maryland (Mr. HOYER) for 5 minutes. cording to the nonpartisan Tax Policy taxes precipitated the worst recession Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, I was here Center’s latest analysis, under the Re- in our memory and a period of severe when Democrats and Republicans came publican plan, 47 percent of the tax budget tightening that led to disinvest- together to enact bipartisan tax reform cuts will benefit that top 1 percent, ment in our country under the threat in 1986. We paid for our tax overhaul just 1.2 million households making of sequestration. and never once asked future genera- more than $900,000 a year. That argument, flawed and false, is tions to foot the bill. Let me repeat: the top 1 percent will that these tax cuts will grow the econ- President Trump said in July that get nearly half of all the tax cuts in omy so much that the ensuing growth tax reform is, and I quote, ‘‘going to be this bill, and 50 percent for the 99 per- will magically erase all the deficits we easy.’’ I will admit that, to someone cent. know their plan will accrue. like him who is new to government and Second, the Republican plan raises So easy, Mr. Speaker, so easy. The who may not understand fully how taxes on 36 million middle class fami- cuts will simply pay for themselves, we b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H9181 . VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:18 Nov 15, 2017 Jkt 079060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A14NO7.000 H14NOPT1 H9182 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE November 14, 2017 are told. We have been told that before, Rural communities also face unique As we celebrate National Rural of course. The cycle repeats: Repub- healthcare concerns, a lack of pro- Health Day this Thursday, it is my lican promises that tax cuts will pay viders, accessibility issues, particu- hope that we continue to strive for a for themselves, followed by massive larly in terms of transportation and 21st century healthcare system that deficits, 189 percent increase in the def- technology, and affordability issues as works for everyone in America. With icit under Ronald Reagan, followed by a result of larger percentages of unin- technology today, we have the oppor- Republicans insisting that we respond sured and underinsured citizens and tunity to expand services, regardless of with austere cuts to investments in our greater out-of-pocket health costs. where one resides, particularly for people and in our opportunity. So eas- Mr. Speaker, before I was elected to those in rural regions where the need is ily they forget. serve in the House of Representatives, great and the services are scarce. But middle class Americans will not I spent nearly 30 years in the nonprofit f forget who is responsible when their healthcare field, assisting those with taxes go up, when their tax increases life-changing diseases and disabilities. PRESIDENT TRUMP’S AMERICA pay for tax cuts for the top 1 percent, I am acutely aware of the challenges FIRST DOCTRINE and when, in the years ahead, more and many face when it comes to obtaining The SPEAKER pro tempore. The more investments need to be cut to pay reasonably priced healthcare. It is es- Chair recognizes the gentleman from the interest on the debt under which pecially critical for rural America, like Illinois (Mr. QUIGLEY) for 5 minutes. this plan will bury the children and much of the Fifth Congressional Dis- Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Speaker, last grandchildren of America. trict of Pennsylvania. week, the President visited Asia for the And all because my colleagues across We are facing a healthcare crisis in first time as Commander in Chief, and the aisle wanted to skip out on doing our Nation’s rural areas. These often took the opportunity, while on foreign what they knew would be hard, just as disadvantaged populations are still soil, to reiterate his America First doc- they did when former Ways and Means struggling to access affordable, quality trine. Committee Chairman Dave Camp in- care. Many remain uninsured. Most are I rise today because an America First troduced his comprehensive tax reform underinsured; however, access to qual- doctrine mentality will not lead to suc- that was responsibly paid for. That is ity care remains the largest challenge. cess for the United States or the world. Even when people gain access to Dave Camp, Republican, State of This way of thinking is an outdated, health insurance, it doesn’t equal ac- Michigan. He is retired now, but he of- obsolete, and dangerous form of isola- cess to care. Rural hospitals across the fered a responsible bill, and it was not tionism. It will not keep us safe. It will country are closing, leaving patients even considered by his committee. not make us stronger economically. without access to their emergency He asked his colleagues to do some- Ironically, this phrase paints a pic- rooms and long-term healthcare facili- thing hard, of course, but they dis- ture that is blatantly un-American.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No Justice for Journalists in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia September 2011
    No Justice for Journalists in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia September 2011 ARTICLE 19 Free Word Centre 60 Farringdon Road London EC1R 3GA United Kingdom Tel: +44 20 7324 2500 Fax: +44 20 7490 0566 E-mail: [email protected] www.article19.org International Media Support (IMS) Nørregarde 18, 2nd floor 1165 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel: +45 88 32 7000 Fax: +45 33 12 0099 E-mail: [email protected] www.i-m-s.dk ISBN: 978-1-906586-27-0 © ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS), London and Copenhagen, August 2011 This work is provided under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 licence. You are free to copy, distribute and display this work and to make derivative works, provided you: 1) give credit to ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS); 2) do not use this work for commercial purposes; 3) distribute any works derived from this publication under a licence identical to this one. To access the full legal text of this licence, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ legalcode. ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS) would appreciate receiving a copy of any materials in which information from this report is used. This report was written and published within the framework of a project supported by the International Media Support (IMS) Media and Democracy Programme for Central and Eastern Europe and the Caucasus. It was compiled and written by Nathalie Losekoot, Senior Programme Officer for Europe at ARTICLE 19 and reviewed by JUDr. Barbora Bukovskà, Senior Director for Law at ARTICLE 19 and Jane Møller Larsen, Programme Coordinator for the Media and Democracy Unit at International Media Support (IMS).
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Hybrid Warfare
    Research Paper Research Division – NATO Defense College, Rome – No. 105 – November 2014 Russia’s Hybrid Warfare Waging War below the Radar of Traditional Collective Defence by H. Reisinger and A. Golts1 “You can’t modernize a large country with a small war” Karl Schlögel The Research Division (RD) of the NATO De- fense College provides NATO’s senior leaders with “Ukraine is not even a state!” Putin reportedly advised former US President sound and timely analyses and recommendations on current issues of particular concern for the Al- George W. Bush during the 2008 NATO Summit in Bucharest. In 2014 this liance. Papers produced by the Research Division perception became reality. Russian behaviour during the current Ukraine convey NATO’s positions to the wider audience of the international strategic community and con- crisis was based on the traditional Russian idea of a “sphere of influence” and tribute to strengthening the Transatlantic Link. a special responsibility or, stated more bluntly, the “right to interfere” with The RD’s civil and military researchers come from countries in its “near abroad”. This perspective is also implied by the equally a variety of disciplines and interests covering a 2 broad spectrum of security-related issues. They misleading term “post-Soviet space.” The successor states of the Soviet conduct research on topics which are of interest to Union are sovereign countries that have developed differently and therefore the political and military decision-making bodies of the Alliance and its member states. no longer have much in common. Some of them are members of the European Union and NATO, while others are desperately trying to achieve The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation State Actors of Protection
    European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Russian Federation State Actors of Protection March 2017 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office EASO Country of Origin Information Report Russian Federation State Actors of Protection March 2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Free phone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Print ISBN 978-92-9494-372-9 doi: 10.2847/502403 BZ-04-17-273-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-9494-373-6 doi: 10.2847/265043 BZ-04-17-273-EN-C © European Asylum Support Office 2017 Cover photo credit: JessAerons – Istockphoto.com Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained herein. EASO Country of Origin Report: Russian Federation – State Actors of Protection — 3 Acknowledgments EASO would like to acknowledge the following national COI units and asylum and migration departments as the co-authors of this report: Belgium, Cedoca (Center for Documentation and Research), Office of the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons Poland, Country of Origin Information Unit, Department for Refugee Procedures, Office for Foreigners Sweden, Lifos, Centre for Country of Origin Information and Analysis, Swedish Migration Agency Norway, Landinfo, Country of
    [Show full text]
  • S/PV.7886 Maintenance of International Peace and Security 21/02/2017
    United Nations S/ PV.7886 Security Council Provisional Seventy-second year 7886th meeting Tuesday, 21 February 2017, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. Klimkin/Mr. Yelchenko ....................... (Ukraine) Members: Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ..................... Mr. Arancibia Fernández China ......................................... Mr. Liu Jieyi Egypt ......................................... Mr. Aboulatta Ethiopia ....................................... Mr. Alemu France ........................................ Mr. Delattre Italy .......................................... Mr. Cardi Japan ......................................... Mr. Bessho Kazakhstan .................................... Mr. Vassilenko Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Iliichev Senegal ....................................... Mr. Seck Sweden ....................................... Ms. Söder United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .. Mr. Rycroft United States of America .......................... Mrs. Haley Uruguay ....................................... Mr. Rosselli Agenda Maintenance of international peace and security Conflicts in Europe Letter dated 3 February 2017 from the Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General (S/2017/108) This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................2 I. THE GOP INVESTIGATION ADVANCED RUSSIA’S ELECTION INTERFERENCE EFFORTS IN SUPPORT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP ..................................................................5 A. Putin and the Kremlin Support the GOP’s Ukraine Conspiracy Theories .......................6 B. GOP Allegations Originate From Sources Closely Tied to Kremlin and Promoting Russian Interests .....................................................................................................................9 1. GOP Investigation is Outcome of Derkach’s Election Interference Efforts .................9 2. Star Witness Telizhenko Has Close Ties to Derkach and Causes National Security Concerns ........................................................................................................................... 12 3. GOP Chairmen Repeatedly Cite Discredited Reporter’s Opinion Columns as Findings of Fact ............................................................................................................................... 16 4. Derkach Ally Giuliani Provided Biden Dirt to GOP Sources.................................... 19 C. Republicans Admit Purpose of Investigation is to Attack Vice President Biden’s Candidacy for President ........................................................................................................ 20 D. No GOP Interest In Hunter Biden Allegations Until Impeachment and 2020 Presidential
    [Show full text]
  • The Talon Volume 41, Issue 6 April 2015
    The Talon Volume 41, Issue 6 April 2015 Jenny Taula Makenzie Summers Student Spotlight Page 4 Bird's Eye View The Art of Ballet Page 2 Page 5 Us vs Them Spring Cleaning Page 6 Page 7 the 12 Russia historically has been a dangerous A bird’s-eye view place for those who oppose the govern- By: Meeleah Francisco, Peyton Murphy, and Taylor Tryon ment. Since 2002, there have been twelve high-profi le assassinations of Russian Democracy Advocate Killed major politicians and journalists. All had opposed the Russian president Vladamir On Febuary 27, 2015 veteran Russian politican Boris Nemtsov was shot and Putin on various policies and actions. 1 killed openly in the streets of Moscow, within view of the Kremlin (Russian Featured here are seven of the most captital building). This occured hours after organizing a peace march protest- controversial murders. ing Russian involvement in Ukraine. A staunch opponent of President Vladamir Valentin Tsvetkov - 2003 Putin, Mr. Nemtsov was in the process of putting together a report investigat- Governor of the eastern Russian province of Magadan Oblast, Tsvetkov was shot by a ing the extent of Russian military involvement in the Ukrainian civil war. Five sniper near the Kremlin. He had been crack- men have been arrested for the murder, with one admitting to the crime. ing down on corrutption in his district. However, Kremlin opposition groups and friends of Nemtsov are skeptical the Sergei Yushenkov - 2003 government’s handling of the arrests. They believe that the men apprehended Liberal politician who led the anti-Kremlin are scapegoats, or merely hitmen, and whoever ordered the crime is still free.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Official Records Seventy-First Session
    United Nations A/71/ PV.72 General Assembly Official Records Seventy-first session 72nd plenary meeting Tuesday, 21 March 2017, 10 a.m. New York President: Mr. Thomson ......................................... (Fiji) The meeting was called to order at 10.15 a.m. the theatre of diplomacy, Ambassador Churkin was a giant, a deep and eloquent intellectual with a sharp wit Tribute to the memory of His Excellency and a disarmingly approachable manner. He served his Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, Permanent country with passion and pride. As the Ambassador of Representative of the Russian Federation to the the Russian Federation to the United Nations for more United Nations than a decade, he became the longest-serving member The President: Before we proceed to the item of the Security Council. Ambassador Churkin’s quick on our agenda, it is my sad duty to pay tribute to intelligence was admired by all, his grasp of the the memory of the late Permanent Representative intricacies of international political affairs undisputed. of the Russian Federation to the United Nations, His His mastery of negotiation and due process commanded Excellency Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, who passed respect from all quarters. But it is the passing of the away on Monday, 20 February 2017. I am joined for man himself that we mourn — the loss of his dry wit, the tribute this morning by members of his bereaved his knowing looks, eye to eye, his smiling dismissal of family, Mrs. Irina Churkin, wife of the late Ambassador, and Mr. Maksim Churkin, their son. On behalf of the nonsense, and his wide cultural reach into literature, General Assembly, I would like to extend to them our theatre and film.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 25 Putin’s Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket by John W. Parker Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for Technology and National Security Policy. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier, August, 2012 (Russian Ministry of Defense) Putin's Syrian Gambit Putin's Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket By John W. Parker Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 25 Series Editor: Denise Natali National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. July 2017 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unholy Alliance
    An Unholy Alliance The European Far Right and Putin’s Russia Antonis Klapsis Antonis Klapsis Antonis Credits Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies Rue du Commerce 20 Brussels, BE 1000 The Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies is the political foundation and think tank of the European People’s Party (EPP), dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.martenscentre.eu Editor: Ingrid Habets, Research Officer, Martens Centre External editing: Communicative English bvba Layout and cover design: RARO S.L. Typesetting: Victoria Agency Printed in Belgium by Drukkerij Jo Vandenbulcke This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. © Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies 2015 The European Parliament and the Wilfied Martens Centre for European Studies assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or their subsequent use. Sole responsibility lies with the author of this publication. ISBN (to come) Table of Contents About us 04 About the author 06 Acknowledgements 08 Executive summary 10 Introduction 12 The ideological connection 16 Russia as a geopolitical alternative 24 Maintaining close contacts 32 Ukraine and Crimea 38 Exercising pressure from within 48 Conclusions 54 Policy recommendations 58 Bibliography 60 Keywords Far right – Political extremism – Russia – European Union – NATO – Anti-Americanism – Euroscepticism – Ukraine – Crimea – Populism About us Martens Centre profile The Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, established in 2007, is the political foundation and think tank of the European People’s Party (EPP). The Martens Centre embodies a pan-European mindset, promoting Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Looming Crisis
    FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Russia’s Looming Crisis By David Satter Russia’s Looming Crisis By David Satter March 2012 About FPRI - - - Founded in 1955 by Ambassador Robert Strausz Hupé, FPRI is a non partisan,- non profit organization devoted to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the development of policies that advance U.S. national interests. In the tradition of Strausz Hupé, FPRI embraces history and geography to illuminate foreign policy challenges facing the United States. In 1990, FPRI established the Wachman Center to foster civic and international literacy in the community and in the classroom. FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 19102-3684 Tel. 215-732- -732-4401 1528 Walnut Street, Suite 610 • Philadelphia, PA 3774 • Fax 215 Email [email protected] • Website: www.fpri.org Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. The Political Situation ........................................................................................................ 3 The Control of the Election Process ............................................................................................ 4 The Economic Key to Putin’s Political Success ....................................................................... 5 A Political Charade ............................................................................................................................ 6 An Election Fraud .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Strategic Narratives on R2P in the 'Near Abroadr
    Nationalities Papers (2020), 1–19 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.54 ARTICLE Russian Strategic Narratives on R2P in the ‘Near Abroad’ Juris Pupcenoks1* and Eric James Seltzer2 1Department of Political Science, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New York, USA and 2School of Law, St. John’s University, Queens, New York, USA *Corresponding Author. Email: [email protected] Abstract This article assesses Russian strategic narratives towards its interventions in Georgia (2008) and Ukraine (2014–16) based on a new database of 50 statements posted on the websites of the Russian Mission to the United Nations and the President of Russia homepage. By looking more broadly at Russian strategic narratives aimed at persuading other global actors and publics abroad and at home, this article identifies how Russia attempted to develop a story that could win global acceptance. This analysis shows that contrary to traditional Russian emphasis on sovereign responsibility and non-intervention, Russia supported claims for self-determination by separatist groups in Georgia and Ukraine. Russia used deception and disinformation in its strategic narratives as it mis-characterized these conflicts using Responsibility to Protect (R2P) language, yet mostly justified its own interventions through references to other sources of international law. Russian strategic narratives focused on delegitimizing the perceived opponents, making the case for the appropriateness of its own actions, and projecting what it proposed as the proper solution to the conflicts. It largely avoided making any references to its own involvement in the Donbas at all. Additionally, Russia’s focus on the protection of co-ethnics and Russian-speakers is reminiscent of interventions in the pre- R2P era.
    [Show full text]
  • Image of the Other. Academic Dialogue in the Post-Soviet Space
    Image of the Other. Academic Dialogue in the Post-Soviet Space Joint project of the Institute of Education Development and Kennan Institute (Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, Washington D.C.) Fall 2018 – Winter 2019 The project goals and objectives The project aim is to respond to the above needs and to mobilize the scholarly community for combatting the spread of xenophobia, ethnic, cultural, gender and other forms of intolerance manifested through use and abuse of the image of the Other. Public goal of this project is the representation of balanced, scholarly grounded approach, unbiased mode of thinking and impartial style of the speech addressing highly controversial and politically manipulated problems and issues related to use and abuse of the image of ‘the Other’. The project was focused on three major objectives: 1. To organize large scale systemic research effort aimed at: a) analysis and deconstruction of cultural, social, ethnic, gender, racial stereotypes (this will begin with an identification of current events, the analysis of which promises to yield a deeper understanding of a larger set of similar events.) b) analysis and deconstruction of political strategies, discourses, manipulative technologies aimed at creation, use, misuse and abuse of the image of ‘the Other.’ (Since the process of imagining ‘the Other’ is familiar human tendency that does not in every instance result in violence and repression, the analysis will also seek to identify situations of multicultural contact and coexistence that exemplifies living with difference.) c) creating forums for the expression of opinion and articulating attitudes of international scholarly communities on these issues, in communication with civil society – independent media, scholarly circles, non-governmental organizations.
    [Show full text]