DOCSLIB.ORG

The London Gazette

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London Gazette 28849. 5447 The London Gazette, ?%e Gazette is registered at the General Post Office for transmission by Inland Post as a yiewspaper. The postage rate to places within the United Kingdom, is one halfpenny for each copy. For places abroad the rate is a halfpenny for every 2 ounces, except in the case of Canada, to which the rate, by Canadian Magazine Post, is a penny for every pound or fraction of a pound. *#* For Table of Contents, see last page. TUESDAY, 14 JULY, 1914. ELECTION OF A REPRESENTATIVE Victor .George Henry Francis, Marquis PEER FOR IRELAND. Conyngham. James Edward William Theobald, Marquis of Crown and Hanaper Office, Ormonde. IQth July, 1914. Hubert George, Marquis of Clanricarde. Charles Henry John, Earl of Waterford. N pursuance of an Act passed in the fortieth Charles Spencer Canning, Earl of Cork and I year of the reign of His Majesty King Orrery. George the Third, entitled " An Act to regu- Anthony Francis, Earl of Westmeath. '' late the mode by which the Lords Spiritual Reginald, Earl of Meath. '' and Temporal, and the Commons, to serve in Arthur James Francis, Earl of Fingall. "the Parliament of the United Kingdom, on Frederick Rudolph, Earl of Cavan. "the part of Ireland, shall be summoned and Henry Charles Ponsonby, Earl of Drogheda. "returned to the said Parliament," I do Bernard Arthur William Patrick Hastings, hereby give Notice, that Writs bearing teste Earl of Granard. this day, have issued for electing a Temporal William Charles de Muro, Earl FitzWilliam. Peer of Ireland, to succeed to the vacancy made Henry Charles Keith, Earl of Kerry. in the House of Lords of the said United Ivo Francis Walter, Earl of Darnley. Kingdom by the demise of George, Earl Charles John, Earl of Egmont. of Lucan, which said writs are severally Edward, Earl of Bessborough. directed to the following Peers, whose right Charles Ernest Alfred French Somerset, Earl to vote at the elections of Temporal Peers of Carrick. of Ireland has, upon claims made on their Charles John Brinsley, Earl of Lanesborough. behalf, been admitted by the House of Lords Arthur Jocelyn Charles, Earl of Arran. of the said United Kingdom: — James George Henry, Earl of Courtown. James Albert Edward, Duke of Abercorn. John Horatio, Earl of Mexborough. Arthur Wills John Wellington Trumbull Henry Edwyn, Earl of Kingston. Blundell, Marquis of Downshire. Osbert Cecil, Earl of Sefton. Geoffrey Thomas, Marquis of Headfort. Robert Julian Orde, Earl of Roden. George Ulick, Marquis of Sligo. Arthur Vesey, Earl of Clanwilliam. John Henry, Marquis of Ely. Edward George Augustus Harcourt, Earl Charles Stewart, Marquis of Londonderry. Mountcashell..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regal (Hastings) Ltd V Gulliver (1942)
    This is a repository copy of Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver (1942). White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/75080/ Version: Published Version Book Section: Nolan, Richard orcid.org/0000-0002-7134-5124 (2012) Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver (1942). In: Landmark Cases in Equity. Hart Publishing Limited , Oxford , pp. 499-528. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 17 Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver (1942) RICHARD NOLAN A. INTRODUCTION LMOST 70 YEARS have passed since the House of Lords’ decision in Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver,1 and over 40 years since it Afigured so prominently in Boardman v Phipps,2 yet little is known about the very strange course of the proceedings in Regal. At first instance, and in the Court of Appeal, Regal was argued and decided as a case at common law for negligence, money had and received, or misfeasance.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Great Advocates by Kylie Day
    LEGAL HISTORY Six great advocates By Kylie Day At the swearing in of Fullerton J in the Supreme Court In short, the book is a delight. It is a quick afternoon’s of New South Wales earlier this year, Michael Slattery read, and Lord Birkett’s style is engaging and easy. QC referred to the extravagant compliment paid by There are a number of things that I particularly like Sir Patrick Hastings KC, the great English advocate about Six Great Advocates. One is Lord Birkett’s gift for of the 1920s, to friend and fellow advocate Norman making these advocates of a bygone era come to life. Birkett. Hastings is reported to have said of Birkett: The reader gets very close to the experience of seeing and hearing them in action in the courtroom, because ... if it had ever been my lot to decide to cut up a of Lord Birkett’s powers of description and attention lady into small pieces and put her in an unwanted to detail. No doubt the reality is heightened because suitcase, I should without hesitation have placed he knew a number of them personally. It helps that he my future in Norman Birkett’s hands. He would was briefed on the other side in some of the cases from have satisfied the jury (a) that I was not there, (b) which he plucks moments. Lord Birkett also understood that I had not cut up the lady and (c) that if I had well the difference between the written word, and she had thoroughly deserved it anyway.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON Gfaz^TTE, JULY 5, 1904. 4237
    THE LONDON GfAZ^TTE, JULY 5, 1904. 4237 ; '.' "• Y . ' '-Downing,Street. Charles, Earl of-Leitrim. '-'--•'. ' •' July 5, 1904. jreorge, Earl of Lucan. The KING has been pleased to approve of the Somerset Richard, Earl of Belmore. appointment of Hilgrpye Clement Nicolle, Esq. Tames Francis, Earl of Bandon. (Local Auditor, Hong Kong), to be Treasurer of Henry James, Earl Castle Stewart. the Island of Ceylon. Richard Walter John, Earl of Donoughmore. Valentine Augustus, Earl of Kenmare. • William Henry Edmond de Vere Sheaffe, 'Earl of Limericks : i William Frederick, Earl-of Claricarty. ''" ' Archibald Brabazon'Sparrow/Earl of Gosford. Lawrence, Earl of Rosse. '• -' • . ELECTION <OF A REPRESENTATIVE PEER Sidney James Ellis, Earl of Normanton. FOR IRELAND. - Henry North, -Earl of Sheffield. Francis Charles, Earl of Kilmorey. Crown and Hanaper Office, Windham Thomas, Earl of Dunraven and Mount- '1st July, 1904. Earl. In pursuance of an Act passed in the fortieth William, Earl of Listowel. year of the reign of His Majesty King George William Brabazon Lindesay, Earl of Norbury. the Third, entitled " An Act to regulate the mode Uchtef John Mark, Earl- of Ranfurly. " by which the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Jenico William Joseph, Viscount Gormanston. " the Commons, to serve ia the Parliament of the Henry Edmund, Viscount Mountgarret. " United Kingdom, on the part of Ireland, shall be Victor Albert George, Viscount Grandison. n summoned and returned to the said Parliament," Harold Arthur, Viscount Dillon. I do hereby-give Notice, that Writs bearing teste Aldred Frederick George Beresford, Viscount this day, have issued for electing a Temporal Peer Lumley. of Ireland, to succeed to the vacancy made by the James Alfred, Viscount Charlemont.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Marriages, Being an Index to the Marriages in Walker's Hibernian
    — .3-rfeb Marriages _ BBING AN' INDEX TO THE MARRIAGES IN Walker's Hibernian Magazine 1771 to 1812 WITH AN APPENDIX From the Notes cf Sir Arthur Vicars, f.s.a., Ulster King of Arms, of the Births, Marriages, and Deaths in the Anthologia Hibernica, 1793 and 1794 HENRY FARRAR VOL. II, K 7, and Appendix. ISSUED TO SUBSCRIBERS BY PHILLIMORE & CO., 36, ESSEX STREET, LONDON, [897. www.genespdf.com www.genespdf.com 1729519 3nK* ^ 3 n0# (Tfiarriages 177.1—1812. www.genespdf.com www.genespdf.com Seventy-five Copies only of this work printed, of u Inch this No. liS O&CLA^CV www.genespdf.com www.genespdf.com 1 INDEX TO THE IRISH MARRIAGES Walker's Hibernian Magazine, 1 771 —-1812. Kane, Lt.-col., Waterford Militia = Morgan, Miss, s. of Col., of Bircligrove, Glamorganshire Dec. 181 636 ,, Clair, Jiggmont, co.Cavan = Scott, Mrs., r. of Capt., d. of Mr, Sampson, of co. Fermanagh Aug. 17S5 448 ,, Mary = McKee, Francis 1S04 192 ,, Lt.-col. Nathan, late of 14th Foot = Nesbit, Miss, s. of Matt., of Derrycarr, co. Leitrim Dec. 1802 764 Kathcrens, Miss=He\vison, Henry 1772 112 Kavanagh, Miss = Archbold, Jas. 17S2 504 „ Miss = Cloney, Mr. 1772 336 ,, Catherine = Lannegan, Jas. 1777 704 ,, Catherine = Kavanagh, Edm. 1782 16S ,, Edmund, BalIincolon = Kavanagh, Cath., both of co. Carlow Alar. 1782 168 ,, Patrick = Nowlan, Miss May 1791 480 ,, Rhd., Mountjoy Sq. = Archbold, Miss, Usher's Quay Jan. 1S05 62 Kavenagh, Miss = Kavena"gh, Arthur 17S6 616 ,, Arthur, Coolnamarra, co. Carlow = Kavenagh, Miss, d. of Felix Nov. 17S6 616 Kaye, John Lyster, of Grange = Grey, Lady Amelia, y.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Parliament Disqualified Since 1900 This Document Provides Information About Members of Parliament Who Have Been Disqu
    Members of Parliament Disqualified since 1900 This document provides information about Members of Parliament who have been disqualified since 1900. It is impossible to provide an entirely exhaustive list, as in many cases, the disqualification of a Member is not directly recorded in the Journal. For example, in the case of Members being appointed 5 to an office of profit under the Crown, it has only recently become practice to record the appointment of a Member to such an office in the Journal. Prior to this, disqualification can only be inferred from the writ moved for the resulting by-election. It is possible that in some circumstances, an election could have occurred before the writ was moved, in which case there would be no record from which to infer the disqualification, however this is likely to have been a rare occurrence. This list is based on 10 the writs issued following disqualification and the reason given, such as appointments to an office of profit under the Crown; appointments to judicial office; election court rulings and expulsion. Appointment of a Member to an office of profit under the Crown in the Chiltern Hundreds or the Manor of Northstead is a device used to allow Members to resign their seats, as it is not possible to simply resign as a Member of Parliament, once elected. This is by far the most common means of 15 disqualification. There are a number of Members disqualified in the early part of the twentieth century for taking up Ministerial Office. Until the passage of the Re-Election of Ministers Act 1919, Members appointed to Ministerial Offices were disqualified and had to seek re-election.
    [Show full text]
  • From Batoni's Brush to Canova's Chisel: Painted and Sculpted Portraiture at Rome, 1740-1830 Volume One of Two: Text Maeve O'dwy
    From Batoni's Brush to Canova's Chisel: Painted and sculpted portraiture at Rome, 1740-1830 Volume One of Two: Text Maeve O'Dwyer PhD Thesis University of Edinburgh 2016 I, Maeve O'Dwyer, ________________________________, hereby declare that the work contained within has been composed by me and is entirely my own work. No part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. 2 Abstract This thesis examines the city of Rome as a primary context of British sociability and portrait identity during the period from 1740 to 1830. Part I considers the work of the portrait painter Pompeo Batoni. It examines the pictorial record of grand tourist sociability at Rome in the 1750s, questioning the complex articulation of nationality among British visitors, and the introduction of overt references to antiquity in the portraiture of Pompeo Batoni. It subsequently interrogates Batoni's use of the partially nude Vatican Ariadne sculpture in five portraits of male grand tourists, dating from Charles John Crowle in 1762, to Thomas William Coke in 1774. Part II of this thesis considers the realities of viewing the sculpted body at Rome, recreating the studios of sculptors Christopher Hewetson and Antonio Canova. It posits the studio space as a locus of sociability for British visitors to Rome, drawing on the feminine gaze in the form of the early nineteenth-century writings of Charlotte Eaton and Lady Murray. The final chapter moves from the focus on British sitters to examine sculpture by Antonio Canova, framing it within a wider discourse of masculinity and propriety.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canterbury Association
    The Canterbury Association (1848-1852): A Study of Its Members’ Connections By the Reverend Michael Blain Note: This is a revised edition prepared during 2019, of material included in the book published in 2000 by the archives committee of the Anglican diocese of Christchurch to mark the 150th anniversary of the Canterbury settlement. In 1850 the first Canterbury Association ships sailed into the new settlement of Lyttelton, New Zealand. From that fulcrum year I have examined the lives of the eighty-four members of the Canterbury Association. Backwards into their origins, and forwards in their subsequent careers. I looked for connections. The story of the Association’s plans and the settlement of colonial Canterbury has been told often enough. (For instance, see A History of Canterbury volume 1, pp135-233, edited James Hight and CR Straubel.) Names and titles of many of these men still feature in the Canterbury landscape as mountains, lakes, and rivers. But who were the people? What brought these eighty-four together between the initial meeting on 27 March 1848 and the close of their operations in September 1852? What were the connections between them? In November 1847 Edward Gibbon Wakefield had convinced an idealistic young Irishman John Robert Godley that in partnership they could put together the best of all emigration plans. Wakefield’s experience, and Godley’s contacts brought together an association to promote a special colony in New Zealand, an English society free of industrial slums and revolutionary spirit, an ideal English society sustained by an ideal church of England. Each member of these eighty-four members has his biographical entry.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette
    Httmb. 27443. 3965 The London Gazette. |)tiblfejjrti by Authority. TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 1902. Wav Office, Lieutenant-Colonel R. V. Kelly, New South Wales June 17, 1902. Army Medical Corps. Surgeon-Lieutenant-Colonel E. Fiset, M.D., X DESPATCH from Field-Marshal Earl Medical Officer Royal Canadian Regiment. Roberts, K.G., G.C.B., Y.O., &c., to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for War, Major and Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel J. Adye, W ar Office, Loudon, W .:— Royal Artillery. Major E. D. Brown, V.C., 14th Hussars. London, Major (now Lieutenant-Colonel) E. AY. D. Baird, Sib, 1st March, 1902.AngloBoerWar.comSuffolk Imperial Yeomanry. IN continuation of my Despatch, dated London, Major H. G. Moor, Royal Artillery (with West 4th September, 1901, in which I brought to your Australia Mounted Infantry) (killed in action). notice, in a very comprehensive and representa­ Major R. Bayard, the Buffs (East Kent Regi­ tive list, the services rendered by the various ment). arms and departments of the Army in South Major J. E. Caunter, the Lancashire Fusiliers. Africa, during the time 1 was in chief command Major F. II. Munn, Princess Victoria’s (Royal in that country, up to 29th November, 1900, I Irish Fusiliers) (since deceased). now have the honour to submit the following- Major F. C. A. Gilpin, Army Service Corps. additional names of Officers, Non-commissioned Major G. Le M. Gretton,- 3rd Battalion the Officers, Men, Nurses, and Civilians who also Leicestershire Regiment. have rendered meritorious service, but the Surgeon-Major F. J. Ingoldby, West Australia investigation of whose cases for special mention Medical Staff.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1924 Labour Government and the Failure of the Whips
    The 1924 Labour Government and the Failure of the Whips by Michael Meadowcroft The first Labour government has been the subject of much research aided by a remarkable number of MPs who served in the 1924 parliament who either wrote memoirs or were the subject of biographies. However, though there is a consensus on the underlying strategic aim of Labour to use the arithmetic of the Liberals’ political dilemma to deal the party a lethal blow, there has been no focus hitherto on the day-to-day parliamentary process and the lack of a clear Labour strategy in government. There was neither a tactical decision to have measures that the Liberals could be expected to support, nor a deliberate policy to press forward with more socialist legislation that would please its own MPs, or at least the more vocal of them, and deliberately challenge the Liberal MPs. Instead the government continued along an almost day-to-day existence. The Labour parliamentary party had no collective experience of managing parliament and singularly failed to learn the tricks of the trade, not least as a consequence of the failure of the party whips to function effectively. This analysis focuses on the key role of the party whips and on their responsibility for the short nine-month life of the first Labour government. I have to declare an interest as a paid up member of the Whips’ Union having acted as Alan Beith’s deputy whip, 1983–86. The importance of the whips in a party system is a neglected field of study.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX I the Carlton Club Meeting, 19 October 1922
    APPENDIX I The Carlton Club Meeting, 19 October 1922 This appendix lists the vote at the Carlton Club Meeting of all Conservative M.P.s It is based on a list in the Austen Chamber­ lain Papers (AC/33/2/92), and has been checked against public statements by the M.P.s of their votes at the meeting. In two cases the public statements disagreed with Chamberlain's list. They were Sir R. Greene (Hackney North) and C. Erskine-Bolst (Hackney South). Chamberlaine's list said that Greene supported the Coalition, while Erskine-Bolst opposed it. The two men indicated that they had the opposite opinion, and their votes may have been transposed in Chamberlain's list. The appendix gives information on the attitude of Conserva­ tive M.P.s towards the Coalition before the Carlton Club Meet­ ing, and it also lists some M.P.s who were present but who according to Chamberlain did not vote. R. R. James, using a different source, published a list of the M.P.s voting at the Carlton Club (Memoirs Of A Conservative, 130-3). He gave the total vote as 185 opponents of the Coalition, and 88 supporters, and he lists 184 opponents of the Coalition. M.P.s who were listed differently from Chamberlain's accounting were: H. C. Brown (Chamberlain, anti; James, absent) C. Carew (Chamberlain, absent; James, pro) G. L. Palmer (Chamberlain, absent; James, anti) H. Ratcliffe (Chamberlain, absent; James, pro) 222 THE FALL OF LLOYD GEORGE N. Raw (Chamberlain, absent; James, anti) R. G. Sharman-Crawford (Chamberlain, anti; James, absent) R.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the British Labour Party
    J1 History, The Labour Party, 1 The History of the British Labour Party This history of the Labour Party celebrates our achievements from its emergence in 1900 as a parliamentary pressure group. We are right to regard as historic the establishment of the National Health Service, the enshrining in law of equality of opportunity for all and the creation and maintenance of an empowering welfare state – all Labour achievements. Equally important has been the development of Labour as a mass membership party in the 1920s and 1930s, the modernisation of our campaigning techniques in the 1980s and the election of 101 Labour women MPs in 1997. However, the lessons we should draw from our history are not all positive. Labour was in government for just 23 of its first 100 years. On occasions we have also been the victim of division and disunity which, as we all know, has cost us dear in electoral terms. It has allowed the Tories to win and undermine our achievements. Our history is one to be proud of. Since our formation, Labour has grown from nothing into a formidable political organisation and one which has achieved major social and political reforms during the 20th century. The agenda for the future is to ensure that our values become rooted in British culture so that we can achieve lasting social, economic and political change in Britain. How the Labour Party began The Labour Party was created in 1900: a new party for a new century. Its formation was the result of many years of hard effort by working people, trade unionists and socialists, united by the goal of changing the British Parliament to represent the interests of everybody.
    [Show full text]
  • MS 69 Papers of Christopher Collins, Mid to Late Seventeenth Century, C.1800-75
    1 MS 69 Papers of Christopher Collins, mid to late seventeenth century, c.1800-75 Christopher Collins entered the service of the First Duke of Wellington in 1824 and remained as his confidential servant for the remainder of the Dukes life, continuing in the service of the Second Duke. He travelled with Wellington on most of his journeys, including Wellington’s journey to St. Petersburg in February to April 1826. The collection that forms MS 69 was for the most part separated from the papers of the First Duke of Wellington that form MS 61 during the 1860s, when that collection was weeded extensively, and which were preserved by Collins rather than being destroyed. Other papers include a sample of Wellington’s letters and notes to Collins, which provide an interesting insight into the organization and running of the Duke’s household. The Collection divides into four groups: (i) political correspondence of the First Duke of Wellington, 1807-1852 (ii) correspondence of Wellington with Lieutenant Colonel Gurwood, editor of his Dispatches (iii) Wellington’s correspondence with Christopher Collins and (iv) papers of Christopher Collins. The collection was grouped in five portfolios and his arrangement has been preserved. It was acquired by the University with the assistance of the Museums and Galleries Commission/Victoria and Albert Museum Purchase Grant Fund and the Pilgrim Trust at Messrs. Woolley and Wallis’ sale at Salisbury on 13 November 1991. MS 69 1/1 Letter from Prince Albert to Arthur Wellesley, First Duke of Wellington. Prince Albert conveys Queen Victoria’s approval of Prince Albert’s design of military cap.
    [Show full text]