Water Management Faq's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Management Faq's WATER MANAGEMENT FAQ’S Part 1: Issued 17/02/2012 http://www.waterscape.com/features-and-articles/features/water-management-faqs Managing the water in a 200-year-old canal system throws up lots of challenges, particularly in a dry year. British Waterways’ water management team are often asked questions about their work by boaters or members of the public. Here, they’ve collected some of the most common questions and explained the answers. If you have any further questions on water management or drought mitigation, please feel free to post them in the comments. The water management team will either respond to them directly, or include them in future FAQs. How much water is there in a lock? The volume of water used in the operation of a broad lock is roughly 0.24 megalitres (240,000 litres, or more nearly 53,000 gallons). In a narrow lock this figure is about 0.14 megalitres (140,000 litres or 31,000 gallons). How many lock operations are there in a year, week or day? This varies across the network and some locks are obviously busier than others. Braunston, at the heart of the network, sees around 6,000 lock operations each year. The average figure for locks across the South East is in the region of 4,000 lock operations. In comparison, locks in the Kennet & Avon region average around 2,300 lock operations per year. BW produces an Annual Lockage Report every January/February, detailing lockage for the previous year, which is available for download on the BW website. At the peak of summer, a popular lock may see in the region of 230 lockages per week (or 33 lock operations a day). A maximum of six lock operations is the most you could feasibly expect in one hour - ten minutes for each passage through a lock. Do pumping stations operate all year round? Pumping stations don’t generally operate outside of the main boating season as demands are low and the canal pounds are mostly fed by surface water inflows. Throughout the boating season, pumps are generally automated – they kick in when sensors detect that water levels need topping up. Page 2 of 7 What rate do the pumps work at? They are all different, but, for example, pumps at Hillmorton on the North Oxford Canal can move 17 megalitres per day (17,300,000 litres or 3,800,000 gallons per day). That’s more than 120 narrow locks of water. On the Kennet & Avon Canal near Bath, the Claverton pumps abstract up to 36 megalitres per day (36,000,000 litres or 8,000,000 gallons per day). A chain of backpumps recirculate lockage water, and transfer water from the River Avon up to the Summit pound to meet canal demands. Why don’t pumping stations operate all the time? There are a few reasons why pumping stations cannot operate all the time. Before we go through them it may help to explain that pumps have a number of roles – to take water from neighbouring rivers and groundwater sources; to recirculate water displaced during lock operations; and, in some cases, to transfer water from one pound to another. In the case of taking water from rivers, it is important to bear in mind that, under Environment Agency regulations, we are only able to do so when the rivers have enough water in them. For example, the three pumps at the River Tove (that feeds into the Grand Union Canal north of Milton Keynes) have a total capacity of 19 megalitres per day, but we are restricted in periods of low river flows to only 4 megalitres per day. Similarly Hillmorton pumps water from the River Swift up to the Braunston Pound where it can then be pumped up to the South Oxford Summit by the Napton pumps. However, in drought conditions the volume of water abstracted from the River Swift reduces and therefore the frequency with which the pumps operate reduces. Pumping stations can’t instantly recirculate water displaced through lock operations as, at peak times, they simply can’t keep up. Therefore the water level in upstream pounds may gradually fall and downstream pounds may rise during the course of a busy day. We’re continually monitoring the operational settings of our pumping stations to make sure they work as efficiently as possible. In the long term, we are planning to introduce more ‘intelligent’ pumping controls that dynamically control pound levels by concentrating pumping outside of times of peak demand, rather than reactively responding to lockage demands. How do you deal with broken pumping stations? Where possible we plan pump maintenance and downtime outside the main boating season. However, if a pumping station has a fault during the boating season we will try to get it back up and running as quickly as possible. In an ideal world we would have a spare pump for each site but, as each is so different, it just isn’t practical for us to do that. Some pump stations have a standby pump which can be used if the main pump has a problem. Sadly this doesn’t mean that we can run both pumps together, as the connecting pipework will only be big enough to take the flow from one of the pumps. Page 3 of 7 Why don’t you add more pumping stations or increase pump capacities when there is a drought? Pumping stations exist at locations where it strategically makes sense to have them for recirculating or transferring water. Many pumping stations in the South East were introduced at key locations during the mid-1990s, following regular droughts and water shortages. Initially these were temporary pumps designed to deal with an immediate drought problem, but they have since been converted into permanent installations. At some locations it wouldn’t make sense to have pumps. For example it isn’t worth having a backpump at Foxton, as this would deplete water to the GU North, or recirculate water south from the South Oxford Summit which isn’t a feasible option. The Hatton Flight has no backpumping and therefore water always flows to waste in Leamington. Why are you not transferring this water up the Radford to Calcutt Flight? Our aim is to operate the canal as efficiently as possible to minimise water demands. However, there will always be residual terminal flows in certain trough pounds, such as at Leamington. Pumping trials and data that we have collected from our telemetry system shows that we are successfully recirculating lockage water along Radford to Calcutt. However, for a number of reasons (other than the capacity of the pumps) achieving an actual net transfer of water from Leamington is difficult. The ‘hydraulic’ capacity of the flight to transfer water is restricted by short pounds with limited freeboard. A solution to this issue (involving longer rising mains bypassing multiple locks) has been investigated but, at the moment, it is disproportionately expensive for the water resources gain. Why don’t you fix all your leaking lock gates? The majority of water lost from the canal is through seepage and evaporation. The canal network is more than 200 years old and largely features a clay-lined canal bed which is not 100% watertight. While we have more water travelling through some locks than we would like, most of it remains within the canal system to feed demand lower down. In these cases, the lock leakage simply allows water to pass downstream, which is water that we would otherwise have had to feed via sluices and bypass weirs. This winter we are spending over £20m across the network on a wide range of maintenance works, with an additional £10m of construction works coming from third party funding. As part of this maintenance over 200 lock gates are being replaced. What did the restrictions during the summer of 2011 actually achieve? The weather last year was extremely dry. As the main boating season progressed, it became clear that the drought would have a significant impact on canal water resources. We have estimated that had the restrictions not been implemented a full closure of navigation would have occurred across much of the Grand Union Mainline, GU North and the Oxford Canal by the end of August. Therefore restrictions were introduced which had the following aims: They reduced demands by discouraging boat usage from areas most at risk (i.e. the Leicester Line and GU North, served by Naseby, Welford, Sulby and Saddington Reservoirs). Limited operating hours enabled more effective recirculation of lockage and efficient supply of water around the ‘hydrological unit’ via backpumping Page 4 of 7 By concentrating lockage to peak times, boaters were encouraged to share locks and make the most efficient use of water. Do restrictions simply concentrate the same lock usage (and hence water use) into a shorter period? No, our experience and monitoring of lock usage shows that the restrictions led to decreases in lock usage. The decrease depended on the location and the nature of the restriction. Areas seeing lockage restricted to 10am-2pm typically saw a reduction in daily lockage of 20%. The Foxton Flight, where essential movements only were allowed 10am-2pm saw a reduction in daily lockage of up to 40%. Given that reservoirs are so low, what are you doing to prepare for next season? In addition to the annual winter stoppage programme, £700,000 is being spent on vital drought mitigation works in the Midlands and South East to try and conserve as much water as possible. The schemes include clearing canal feeders, pumping and transferring additional water into our reservoirs, installing additional monitoring equipment to allow existing backpumps to be used more effectively, accelerating existing major works projects to deliver in time for the main boating season and relining a number of leaking lock gates in the worst affected areas to reduce demands for water.
Recommended publications
  • Four Thousand Ships Passed Through the Lock: Object-Induced Measure Functions on Events
    MANFRED KRIFKA FOUR THOUSAND SHIPS PASSED THROUGH THE LOCK: OBJECT-INDUCED MEASURE FUNCTIONS ON EVENTS 1 . INTRODUCTION 1.1. Event-Related and Object-Related Readings The subject of this paper* is certain peculiar readings of sentences like the following ones: (1)a. Four thousand ships passed through the lock last year. b. The library lent out 23,000 books in 1987. C. Sixty tons of radioactive waste were transported through the lock last year. d. The dry cleaners cleaned 5.7 million bags of clothing in 1987. e. 12,000 persons walked through the turnstile yesterday. Take the first example, (la) (it is inspired by the basic text of the LiLog project of IBM Germany, which first drew my attention to these sen- tences). It clearly has two readings. The first one, call it the object-related reading, says that there are four thousand ships which passed through the lock last year. The second one, call it the event-related reading, says that there were four thousand events of passing through the lock by a ship last year. The object-related reading presupposes the existence of (at least) four thousand ships in the world we are talking about. In the event-related reading, there might be fewer ships in the world. In the limiting case, a single ship passing through the lock about 12 times a day would be suffi- cient. We find the same ambiguity in the other examples of (1). The library might contain fewer than 23,000 books, there might be less than sixty tons of radioactive waste, there might be less than 5.7 million bags of clothing, and there might be fewer than 12,000 persons - but the sentences (lb-e) could still be true in their event-related readings.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterway Dimensions
    Generated by waterscape.com Dimension Data The data published in this documentis British Waterways’ estimate of the dimensions of our waterways based upon local knowledge and expertise. Whilst British Waterways anticipates that this data is reasonably accurate, we cannot guarantee its precision. Therefore, this data should only be used as a helpful guide and you should always use your own judgement taking into account local circumstances at any particular time. Aire & Calder Navigation Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Bulholme Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 6.3m 2.74m - - 20.67ft 8.99ft - Castleford Lock is limiting due to the curvature of the lock chamber. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Castleford Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom 61m - - - 200.13ft - - - Heck Road Bridge is now lower than Stubbs Bridge (investigations underway), which was previously limiting. A height of 3.6m at Heck should be seen as maximum at the crown during normal water level. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Heck Road Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.71m - - - 12.17ft - 1 - Generated by waterscape.com Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Leeds Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.5m 2.68m - - 18.04ft 8.79ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Crown Point Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.62m - - - 11.88ft Crown Point Bridge at summer levels Wakefield Branch - Broadreach Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.55m 2.7m - - 18.21ft 8.86ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1989 The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal Stuart William Wells University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Wells, Stuart William, "The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal" (1989). Theses (Historic Preservation). 350. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wells, Stuart William (1989). The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wells, Stuart William (1989). The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 UNIVERSITY^ PENNSYLVANIA. LIBRARIES THE SCHUYLKILL NAVIGATION AND THE GIRARD CANAL Stuart William
    [Show full text]
  • Zander Are Now in the Tove!
    Chronicle & Echo - Northamptonshire weekly paper - angling column as supplied for Thursday February 11, 2016 (version printed in newspaper may differ) Predator angler targets alien species – and proves that... Zander are now in the Tove! ANDER – love 'em or hate 'em the ● RINGER Pairs, Boddington: Karl Conley 113lb, Neil Zsupremely invasive alien predator can Russell 112lb, Glen Maxwell 110lb. Russell and Chris Hill spread faster than office gossip. were top pair. ● And now they have reached the River Tove – just above CASTLE Ashby open, Grendon Lake, Sunday: Chris where the tiny river empties into the Ouse at Cosgrove! Garrett 112-4, Steve Shakespeare 93lb, Phil Wintle 61-12. ● WHITE Hart Flore, Barby Banks: Getting in before the floods (a 'Griffiths family benefit') Trevor started, Castlethorpe's 91lb, Mark 58lb, Dave 51lb. Trevor Ray set out to confirm ■ A WINNER his belief that Zs were in the on the Nene: ● FLORE & Brockhall, Silver Lake: river – washed through from Danny Rob 'three-wins-in-a-row-now' the canal at Stoke – by Harding had Rawlins 9-8 of roach, Bert Isle 8- 33-10 in an targeting them with pieces of 12, Steve Smith 3-8. open at Islip. roach, two miles from the ● NENE, long pound, Stoke: Bob Photo Chris Eales 9-6, Brian Beard 8-10, Andy cut. Morehen "I caught one at the first Kimpton and George Mynard both attempt (around 10 ounces) it 4-9. was obvious they would end ● TOWCESTER Vets, Stow Hill cut: up in the river eventually," Bob Eales 3lb, Tosh Saunders 1- said the man who, a week 15, George Mynard 1-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Overview of the Three Gorges Dam and Reservoir, China—Geologic Hazards and Environmental Impacts
    Geographical Overview of the Three Gorges Dam and Reservoir, China—Geologic Hazards and Environmental Impacts Open-File Report 2008–1241 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geographical Overview of the Three Gorges Dam and Reservoir, China— Geologic Hazards and Environmental Impacts By Lynn M. Highland Open-File Report 2008–1241 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Highland, L.M., 2008, Geographical overview of the Three Gorges dam and reservoir, China—Geologic hazards and environmental impacts: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1241, 79 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1241/ iii Contents Slide 1...............................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic and Structural Design of Navigational Locks
    nvironm E en l & ta Dhanuka et al., J Civil Environ Eng 2018, 8:1 i l iv E C n f g o i n DOI: 10.4172/2165-784X.1000297 l Journal of Civil & Environmental e a e n r r i n u g o J ISSN: 2165-784X Engineering Research Article Open Access Hydraulic and Structural Design of Navigational Locks Amit Dhanuka1*, Shivendra Kumar Agrawal2 and Honey Mehra1 1Howe Projects Engineering Pvt Ltd, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India 2Department of Irrigation and Hydraulics, Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh, India Abstract Navigation lock is a structure in the waterway provided to create a safe navigation passage between two water pools which are not at the same level. The reason for difference in water levels can be natural such as tidal variations or can be manmade such as construction of dam or barrage across the river. The main components of Navigation lock comprise of approach channels, lock pit, filling/emptying arrangement. Design of lock depends on lockage time, water level variations, Lock capacity requirements, design vessel size. filling/emptying system shall be designed to work under gravity flow without any pumping requirements. Filling/emptying system is chosen to get appropriate filling/ emptying time. The optimum time for filling and emptying is generally kept between 8.0-10.0 minutes. The size of filling culverts are so computed to attain the optimum time for filling/emptying. Every lock is unique in terms of its geology, location, size, requirements and water level differences. Here typical design aspects of a navigational Lock in inland waterway have been described.
    [Show full text]
  • Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 Acknowledgements
    Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 Acknowledgements Watermeadows Management Plan 2017-32 The Watermeadows Landscape Management Plan has been written and compiled by Red Kite Network Limited on behalf of Cherwell District Council and South Northamptonshire District Council. Staff from the District Council and the local community have also contributed to the development of the Plan. Red Kite would like to acknowledge the support and assistance from the following people and organisations: Councillor Roger Clarke, South Northamptonshire Council Paul Almond, Street Scene and Landscape Manager at Cherwell District and South Northamptonshire Councils Brian Collins, Landscape Officer at Cherwell District and South Northamptonshire Councils Towcester Town Council Alex Rothwell, Paul Wilkanowski and Helen Chapman from the Environment Agency Towcester Wildlife Trust Group Dr James Littlemore, Senior Lecturer, and Students of Moulton College Further information about the Plan is available from: South Northamptonshire Council The Forum, Moat Lane, Towcester, Northants, NN12 6AD Tel: 01327 322 322 Acknowledgements | 2 Contents Technical overview 3.0 Where do we want to go? Executive summary 3.1 Introduction 19 1.0 Introduction, Context and Background 3.2 SWOT analysis 19 1.1 Statement of Significance 6 3.3 Evaluation 22 1.2 Background to Plan 6 3.4 The Future 23 1.3 Format of Plan 6 3.5 Intervention Areas 25 1.4 Purpose of Plan 7 3.6 Zones and Trails 26 1.5 Development of Plan 7 4.0 How are we going to get there? 1.6 Stakeholder Invovlement and Target
    [Show full text]
  • Official Guide and Map
    TOWCESTER Official Guide and Map Delivered by Royal Mail to residents and businesses in Towcester. Also available from Town Council offices and to view online at www.towcester-tc.gov.uk Please tell the advertiser you saw them in the Towcester Official Guide and Map Award winning salon ‘Creative Salon Award’ Award winning stylists Salon and stylists state registered - National Federation of Hairdressing AWARD LOOKING YOU! Please visit our website for current offers and discounts or contact one of our friendly staff on: 01327 353143 [email protected] || www.flamehairstudios.co.uk Unit 4 - 6 Shire Court, 25 Richmond Road, Towcester, NN12 6EX 1 Please tell the advertiser you saw them in the Towcester Official Guide and Map TOWCESTER Official Guide and Map Issued by the authority of Towcester Town Council www.towcester-tc.gov.uk © Designed and Published by Local Authority Publishing Co. Ltd. www.localauthoritypublishing.co.uk View the online version at www.officialguides.co.uk Newman & Reidy Isuzu, the leading independent used car & van sales and service centre, in the South Northants and Milton Keynes areas. Established over 20 years. We have been selling New and Used vehicles since 2000 and over the years supplied in excess of 6,000 cars and vans all over the UK. Our service and reputation is outstanding, with many customers returning again and again for repairs, MOT’s and vehicle purchases. We look forward to being of service to the local community for many years to come, please feel free to come and put us to the test. The Name
    [Show full text]
  • SHIP BEHAVIOUR in LOCKS and LOCK APPROACHES” by Carsten Thorenz 1, D
    PIANC World Congress San Francisco USA 2014 PIANC WORKING GROUP 155 “SHIP BEHAVIOUR IN LOCKS AND LOCK APPROACHES” by Carsten Thorenz 1, D. Bousmar, J.-P. Dubbelman, Li Jun, D. Spitzer, J.J. Veldman, J. R. Augustijn, W. Kortlever, A. Hartley, A. Moreno, R. Salas, J. Wong, M. Vantorre, O. Weiler, P. Hunter, S. Roux, Wu Peng ABSTRACT The goal of PIANC Inland Commission (InCom) Working Group 155 “Ship behaviour in locks and lock approaches” is to give designers of locks and organizations that operate locks more insight into the troubles which vessels might encounter in the interaction with locks and what to do to avoid them. During the transit of a ship through a lock and even during normal navigation, ships can be significantly affected by the interaction with the processes induced by a lock. It is relevant to have an idea about the governing processes, as they have an impact both on the design and operation of navigation locks. In the report, it is pointed out which effects are important and how these combine with the experience from current and past lock projects. This paper presents an insight on the work of the group and on the main points covered in the report. 1 INTRODUCTION PIANC has the goal of enhancing the exchange of knowledge between people that are engaged in waterborne transport. To achieve this, PIANC brings together international experts on the design, development and maintenance of ports, waterways and coastal areas. Many working groups (WG) are developing technical updates on shared best practices. PIANC InCom WG 155 “Ship behaviour in locks and lock approaches” is a successor to InCom WG 29, which published the Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Marple Locks Trail
    MARPLE LOCKS - A HISTORY Canal builders would, as far as possible, always use This problem was overcome by the construction of a local materials. In the case of the Peak Forest Canal, an tramroad which started near Oldknow's lime kilns, ran ample supply of stone was readily available in the across what is now Strines Road, cut across the corner of Marple Locks are situated on the Peak Forest Canal in district and this was used almost exclusively in the the present Recreation Ground and along the banking Marple Cheshire. construction of lock chambers and bridges. The canals which can still be identified near the children's play The Peak Forest Canal runs from Buxworth in were "cut" by gangs of men using picks, shovels and area. From there it went towards the modern St. Derbyshire, where an arm also services nearby Whaley wheelbarrows. The skilled diggers were called cutters or Martin's Road but turned to cross the canal at lock 10 Bridge, through Furness Vale, New Mills and Disley to bankers and the unskilled, labourers, although soon near the Tollgate Cottage. The grooved support stones Marple. Here it is joined by the Macclesfield Canal. At they all became known as Navigators or "Navvies" for for the rails and the holes for the wooden pegs which Marple the canal descends a flight of sixteen locks, short. The locks were built by masons and the lock gates held them in place can still be seen. The route then lowering the level by 210 feet before crossing 100 feet by carpenters or joiners.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Grand Western Canal Joint
    Public Document Pack Mid Devon District Council Grand Western Canal Joint Advisory Committee Tuesday, 3 October 2017 at 7.00 pm A G E N D A Members are reminded of the need to make declarations of interest prior to any discussion which may take place 1 ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN To elect a Chairman for 2017/18 (the Terms of Reference state that the appointment should be made from the Mid Devon District Council representation for 2017/18). 2 ELECTION OF VICE CHAIRMAN To elect a Vice Chairman for 2017/18 (the Terms of Reference state that this appointment should come from the Devon County Council representation for 2017/18). 3 APOLOGIES To receive any apologies for absence. 4 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME To receive any questions relating to items on the agenda from the members of the public present and replies thereto. 5 MINUTES (Pages 5 - 12) To approve as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on 7 March 2017 (please find attached). 6 MATTERS ARISING To consider any matters arising from the minutes of the previous meeting. 7 CHAIRMAN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS To receive any announcements that the Chairman may wish to make. 1 Committee Administrator: Sarah Lees Tel: 01884 234310 Email: [email protected] This document is available on the Council's Website at: www.middevon.gov.uk 8 COMMUNITY PATROL BOAT To introduce representatives from the Community Patrol Boat and to receive information on the significant role the boat now plays in patrolling the canal. 9 TERMS OF REFERENCE / MEMBERSHIP REVIEW (Pages 13 - 16) To consider the Terms of Reference and membership of the Committee (please find attached).
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Union Canal Walk
    Explore the Colne Valley Park Countryside on your doorstep Points of interest/history 1) The Grand Union Canal was completed in 1805, linking London and the Midlands, and vitally important to Britain’s Industrial CIRCULAR WALK 12: GRAND UNION CANAL Revolution. Denham Deep Lock is so called because at 11 feet it is the deepest on the canal. This was caused by mill owners on the 4 MILES River Frays (passing under the canal at the lock) insisting that the flow on their river was unaffected - hence the long stretch of canal A peaceful stretch of the Grand Union Canal with views over ahead with no lock. John Fray was Baron Lord Chancellor of the magnificent lakes with thriving bird life. Exchequer in the 1400s. He had considerable experience of rivers and mills around London and had a financial interest in Cowley Hall - a property in Hillingdon which adjoins the Frays River. The Frays River is fed by the River Colne at a weir north of Denham Lock. It Access: No steep slopes, but some muddy paths in winter. runs parallel to the Colne for around four miles before rejoining it south of West Drayton. By 1641 the Frays River powered at least 5 Refreshments: Cafes at the Colne Valley Park Visitor Centre (1), mills. The last mill, Fountain's Mill in Uxbridge, was in operation Fran’s Tea Garden at Denham Deep Lock (2), and Widewater Café until after World War Two. on Moorhall Road (3). The Bear on the Barge Pub (A). 2) There are occasional passenger trains from Marylebone to Public transport: By train: Trains from London Marylebone and Denham and beyond.
    [Show full text]