Bioenergetics and the use of Near Infra-

Red Spectroscopy for measuring health and stress response in common

Australian bivalve species

A thesis to meet the requirements of a Higher Degree by Research (Doctor of

Philosophy)

Jill Kathleen Bartlett

University of Canberra

August 2018

Abstract

Coastal estuaries are among the most productive areas of the ocean, both ecologically and economically. Increases in anthropogenic stress factors such as climate change, habitat alteration, contamination and high levels of disturbance in many estuaries have combined with natural stressors inherent in these systems to alter stress regimes on organisms. In

NSW, , coastal and estuarine environments support urban and industrial development activities, with many estuarine areas supporting valuable aquaculture farming.

Bivalves are filter-feeding sessile organisms that inhabit a wide range of habitats. Bivalve species inhabiting estuarine and coastal environments have been used in environmental biomarker and monitoring studies due to their longevity, filter-feeding, sessile nature, ability to accumulate toxins and global distribution.

The acquisition, transfer and use of energy is key to the growth, repair and reproduction of organisms, including bivalves. Changing environmental conditions influence an organism’s capacity to undertake these fitness-related activities and can be limited through their tolerance to stress. Measuring energy stores in the form of protein, lipid and glycogen and potential energy use in the form of electron transport activity (ETS) provides an approach to understanding how organisms are responding to these changing environmental conditions and to assess their capacity for fitness activities. Energy stores versus energy usage can be incorporated into the energetic measure of Cellular Energy Allocation (CEA) that can provide quantitative data on an organism’s energetic response to stress.

Measurement of energetic components using classical chemical and enzymatic measurements is time consuming, difficult and can be quite costly. An alternative approach is to develop

iii quantitative modelling using near infra-red spectroscopy (NIRS). NIRS is one of the classical methods for structure determination of small molecules. Using NIRS and statistical analysis techniques, it is possible to develop a quantitative predictive model for bioenergetic components in bivalves, using spectral image capture and entering the sample’s related analytical chemistry data. Application of quantitative NIRS models reduces both the time and cost associated with energy condition assessment of bivalves.

NIRS quantitative models for total protein, lipid and glycogen stores and ETS activity in five

Australian estuarine bivalve species (, , gigas, Mytilus galloprovincialis and trapezia) were developed, along with a comparison of single species versus multi-species models for protein, lipid and glycogen, with the benefits of multi-species models demonstrating greater model range and applicability. Model quality was assessed using the ratio of performance to the interquartile distance (RPIQ) and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP). All five-species models had an RPIQ greater than 3 and RMSEP less than 12%, indicating that combining like species into models provides robust, reliable results.

Comparisons between individual species models and aggregated models for three species and five bivalve species for each storage component indicates that aggregating data from like species produces high quality models with robust and reliable quantitative application.

The use of bivalve energy assessment is demonstrated by applying bioenergetic assessments to two bivalve stress scenarios. The first is the assessment of energetic changes in an

Australian aquaculture oyster species, S. glomerata, over four seasons to demonstrate the seasonal fluctuations in bioenergetic measurements associated with naturally changing

iv environmental conditions. The study demonstrated clear seasonal trends, with glycogen and lipid content decreasing from summer maximums to autumn minimums then slowly increasing through winter and into spring. Protein and ETS activity demonstrated an opposite trend, with increases in autumn and stable through the other seasons. CEA showed a seasonal change, with higher values over summer, gradually decreasing over autumn and winter then starting to increase again in spring. These results indicate that seasonal changes have a significant influence on S. glomerata storage and allocation of energy.

The second assessment demonstrates the energetic stress response of two oyster species, S. glomerata and O. angasi, exposed to a known metal contamination gradient in Lake

Macquarie, NSW Australia. All energetic measures showed a downward trend in both species in response to sediment metal contamination, demonstrating the value of measuring energetics in bivalves as a measure of stress.

Future studies into the NIRS modelling process should include determining methods for a more direct measure of energy consumption potential. Further useful NIRS models may be built for specific stress proteins such as heat shock proteins and metallothioneins.

Application of energetic assessments to aquaculture-relevant scenarios such as basket and lease density stocking, potential new oyster growing areas and effectiveness of aquaculture techniques may allow for increased productivity. Application of the energetics method to new ecological scenarios and species may also be useful to allow health assessments of other aquatic organisms.

v

Acknowledgements

For my primary supervisor and mentor, Bill Maher. You gave me opportunities and support to achieve more than I realised I could. You gave me the time and flexibility to complete this mammoth task without doubt. Your support through my years of study has been invaluable.

To Tariq Ezaz, my secondary supervisor, your support, time and ideas helped me get this study to what it is.

To my fellow authors of my published and drafted papers, thank you for contributions to this work that couldn’t have happened without your input and hard work.

To the Institute for Applied Ecology, Ecochemistry laboratory and the University of Canberra for facilitating and supporting my studies.

For my husband and collaborator, Matthew Purss. Without your support and input, I could never have achieved such an outcome. From the massive input in developing cutting edge software to allow the computer modelling to take place, to the time and emotional support to get our whole family over the finish line.

To my children, Oliver, Morgan and Teagan. You give me a life I never dreamed possible and distractions from this task when I needed them (and when I didn’t!).

To my parents, Gwen and Michael – for being my Igor’s in the lab and the field and supporting my study dreams from the beginning.

To my fellow PhD students and undergrad volunteers, your help and support has been invaluable.

ix

My PhD journey was marked by great highs and debilitating lows. From attaining a scholarship that allowed me to take this journey, achieving results and outcomes that gave me a wondrous thrill, to the mind-bending frustrations of working out what it all meant. My personal difficulties and health issues along the way spurred me on to fulfil my dreams and appreciate every day as it comes. I plan to take these lessons in life and continue to apply them to all I continue to do.

x

Table of Contents

Abstract ...... iii

Certificate of Authorship ...... vii

Acknowledgements ...... ix

Table of Contents ...... xi

Table of Tables ...... xxiii

Table of Figures...... xxv

Glossary of acronyms ...... xxix

Chapter 1. Introduction ...... 1

Background and rationale ...... 1

Aims and Objectives ...... 3

Chapter 2. The Australian context and relevance of using bioenergetics ...... 5

Setting the scene – Changing environments and the Australian context ...... 5

Australian context ...... 6

Coastal environments ...... 6

Estuarine environments ...... 6

Physical structure and function ...... 7

Ecology ...... 8

Economic value ...... 9

2.2.2.3.1. Aquaculture ...... 9

xi

2.2.2.3.2. Tourism and recreation...... 10

Threats to estuarine health ...... 10

2.2.2.4.1. Industrialisation, urbanisation and contamination ...... 11

2.2.2.4.2. Climate change and ocean acidification in estuaries ...... 12

2.2.2.4.3. Temperature fluctuations...... 14

2.2.2.4.4. Salinity Changes ...... 15

2.2.2.4.5. Hypoxia ...... 16

Bivalve species in Australia ...... 17

Ecology ...... 19

Threats from diseases ...... 19

Sydney – Saccostrea glomerata ...... 21

Flat oyster – Ostrea angasi ...... 24

Pacific oyster – Crassostrea gigas ...... 27

Australian – Mytilus galloprovincialis ...... 29

Sydney – Anadara trapezia ...... 31

Development of whole energy measurement and using Near Infra-Red Spectral modelling ...... 33

Quantifying organism response to environmental change ...... 33

Biological change and biomarkers as measurable biological response to

physiochemical change ...... 33

Energy as a biomarker of stress ...... 34

xii

Cellular Energy Allocation ...... 37

Total Lipids...... 44

Total Proteins ...... 45

Total Glycogen ...... 46

Electron Transport System (ETS) activity ...... 47

Scope for Growth...... 48

Near Infra-red spectroscopy (NIRS) ...... 51

Data Pre-treatment ...... 52

Band width selection ...... 53

Knowledge-based band width selection ...... 53

Algorithm-based band width selection ...... 54

Regression modelling...... 55

Single-term linear regression ...... 55

Multi-term regression ...... 55

Applying quantitative analysis to NIRS data ...... 56

Measures of model “quality” ...... 59

Chapter 3. Near Infra-red spectroscopy quantitative modelling of bivalve protein, lipid and glycogen composition using single-species versus multi-species calibration and validation sets ...... 63

Abstract ...... 67

Introduction ...... 69

xiii

Methods...... 74

Sample Collection ...... 74

Near Infra-red spectra collection ...... 78

Wet chemical analysis...... 78

Total glycogen and protein concentrations ...... 78

Total Lipid concentration ...... 79

NIRS measurements...... 79

NIRS- Quantitative data modelling ...... 79

Model performance assessment ...... 81

Results ...... 82

Protein ...... 83

Single species models ...... 83

Oyster model...... 84

Bivalve model ...... 84

Lipid ...... 93

Single species models ...... 93

Oyster model...... 94

Bivalve model ...... 94

Glycogen ...... 103

Single species models ...... 103

xiv

Oyster species model ...... 104

Bivalve model ...... 104

Discussion ...... 113

Protein ...... 115

Lipids ...... 116

Glycogen ...... 117

Conclusions ...... 119

Chapter 4. Cellular energy allocation analysis of multiple marine bivalves using near infrared spectroscopy ...... 121

Abstract ...... 125

Introduction ...... 127

Materials and procedures ...... 130

Sample collection ...... 130

Near Infra-red spectra (NIRS) collection ...... 130

Chemical and enzymatic analysis ...... 131

Total glycogen and protein concentrations ...... 131

Total lipid concentration ...... 131

Electron Transport System activity (ETS) ...... 132

NIRS Quantitative data modelling ...... 132

Model performance assessment ...... 133

Results and Discussion ...... 135

xv

Protein ...... 140

Lipids ...... 141

Glycogen ...... 143

ETS activity ...... 143

Cellular Energy Allocation ...... 145

General considerations ...... 150

Demonstrated application of results to natural environmental conditions and a

metal contamination gradient ...... 151

Seasonal changes ...... 151

Metal contamination gradient ...... 152

Potential application of models for quantitative bioenergetic analysis ...... 154

Chapter 5. Review of bivalve responses to stress ...... 157

Physiochemical factors and effects on biotic condition ...... 157

Temperature ...... 158

Salinity ...... 164

Carbon dioxide and pH ...... 168

Oxygen ...... 177

Contamination and metal exposure ...... 178

Effects of multiple stressors on organisms ...... 179

Salinity and temperature ...... 179

Salinity and pH ...... 180

xvi

Salinity and oxygen ...... 181

Temperature and pH ...... 181

Temperature and oxygen ...... 182

pH and oxygen ...... 183

Physiochemical changes and metal toxicity ...... 183

Rates of change influencing stress response ...... 189

Pulse versus press ...... 189

Short-term ...... 190

Medium term ...... 191

Seasonal changes ...... 192

Summary ...... 193

Chapter 6. Seasonal bioenergetic changes in Saccostrea glomerata from two age cohorts farmed in Clyde River, NSW Australia ...... 195

Abstract ...... 196

Introduction ...... 197

Methods...... 201

Site Selection and Sample Collection ...... 201

Temperature and Salinity ...... 203

Bioenergetic measurements ...... 203

Total glycogen and protein concentrations ...... 203

Total Lipid concentrations ...... 204

xvii

Electron Transport System activity (ETS) ...... 204

Cellular Energy Allocation ...... 205

Statistical Analysis ...... 205

Results ...... 207

Temperature and Salinity ...... 207

Energy stores ...... 210

Glycogen ...... 210

Protein ...... 210

Lipids ...... 211

Total Energy Stores ...... 212

Total Energy Consumption ...... 212

Cellular Energy Allocation ...... 212

Discussion ...... 217

Glycogen ...... 217

Protein ...... 217

Lipid ...... 218

Total Energy Stores...... 219

ETS activity ...... 220

Cellular Energy Allocation ...... 220

Implications for oyster and environmental monitoring ...... 222

xviii

Chapter 7. Saccostrea glomerata and Ostrea angasi exposed to a metal contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie, NSW Australia: biochemical and whole organism responses 225

Abstract ...... 227

Introduction ...... 229

Methods...... 234

Site selection ...... 234

Species selection ...... 235

Sediment collection ...... 237

Oyster collection and exposure ...... 237

Metal Analysis ...... 237

Sediments...... 237

Bivalves ...... 238

Subcellular biomarkers ...... 238

Total Antioxidant Capacity & Lipid Peroxidation ...... 238

Lysosomal stability ...... 239

Cellular Energy Allocation ...... 240

Total glycogen and protein concentrations ...... 240

Total lipid concentration ...... 241

Electron Transport System activity (ETS) ...... 241

Bioenergetic cost of exposure...... 242

xix

Embryo Development ...... 242

Statistical Analysis ...... 243

Results ...... 244

Sediment metal concentrations ...... 244

Bivalves...... 246

Tissue Metal concentrations – Saccostrea glomerata ...... 246

Tissue Metal concentrations – Ostrea angasi...... 246

Species-specific differences in metal concentrations ...... 246

Oxidative stress response - S. glomerata ...... 247

7.4.2.4.1. Total Antioxidant Capacity ...... 247

7.4.2.4.2. Lipid Peroxidation (LP) ...... 247

7.4.2.4.3. Lysosomal Membrane Stability ...... 247

7.4.2.4.4. Oxidative biomarker interactions ...... 247

Oxidative stress response – O. angasi ...... 248

7.4.2.5.1. TAOC ...... 248

7.4.2.5.2. Lipid peroxidation ...... 248

7.4.2.5.3. Lysosomal Membrane Stability ...... 248

7.4.2.5.4. Oxidative biomarker interactions ...... 248

Energy stores – S. glomerata ...... 251

7.4.2.6.1. Protein ...... 251

xx

7.4.2.6.2. Lipids ...... 251

7.4.2.6.3. Glycogen ...... 251

7.4.2.6.4. Total available energy ...... 252

7.4.2.6.5. Energy biomarker interactions ...... 252

Energy stores – O. angasi ...... 252

7.4.2.7.1. Protein ...... 252

7.4.2.7.2. Lipids ...... 253

7.4.2.7.3. Glycogen ...... 253

7.4.2.7.4. Total available energy ...... 253

7.4.2.7.5. Energy biomarker interactions ...... 254

Energy consumption – S. glomerata and O. angasi ...... 254

Cellular energy allocation– S. glomerata and O. angasi ...... 254

Bioenergetic “cost” of exposure ...... 255

Embryo Development ...... 261

Mortality ...... 262

Discussion ...... 263

Sediment metal concentrations ...... 263

Metal bioaccumulation...... 264

Oxidative response ...... 268

Bioenergetic responses to metal exposure ...... 269

xxi

Embryo Development ...... 274

Conclusions ...... 276

Chapter 8. Synopsis and Conclusions ...... 277

NIRS modelling ...... 277

Using bioenergetics to assess bivalve condition and responses...... 278

Improvements and future studies ...... 283

NIRS quantitative modelling and chemical data sets ...... 283

Application of CEA approach ...... 284

Conclusions ...... 285

Chapter 9. References ...... 287

Appendix 1 – Traditional chemistry testing methods assessment ...... 323

Appendix 2 – Data in Brief article ...... 343

xxii

Table of Tables

Table 2.1 - Classification of species examined ...... 18

Table 2.2 - Glycogen changes in bivalve response to physiochemical seasonal changes . 41

Table 2.3 - Protein changes in bivalves in response to seasonal changes ...... 42

Table 2.4 - Lipid energy composition changes in bivalves in response to seasonal changes ...... 43

Table 2.5 - NIRS model performance assessment parameters ...... 61

Table 3.1 - Sample collection details for NIRS modelling ...... 76

Table 3.2 - Protein Calibration model for individual species models versus multi-species model ...... 92

Table 3.3 - Lipid Calibration model results for individual species models versus multi- species model ...... 102

Table 3.4 - Glycogen Calibration model results for individual species models versus multi-species model ...... 112

Table 4.1 - Chemical composition of bivalve tissues used in the calibration and validation data sets, showing the number of samples (n), median and range. All results are for tissue dry mass...... 136

Table 4.2 - NIRS modelling of bivalve composition outcomes for the quality assessment of each component modelled...... 139

Table 4.3 - Measure of model quality using the modelled sample output and measured values. Value is calculated as (measured value/predicted value*100) then averaged and presented with ± Standard Error. They are then converted to a percentage of the

xxiii measured range of values. To assess the model robustness, the closer to 100%, the more accurate the predictive outcomes...... 139

Table 5.1 - Effect of varied temperature exposures on multiple bivalve species ...... 160

Table 5.2 - Effect of salinity changes on multiple bivalve species ...... 166

Table 5.3 - Effect of carbon dioxide dissolution and pH changes on multiple bivalve species ...... 171

Table 5.4 - Effect of multiple stressors on bivalve species...... 185

Table 6.1 - Total energy available, cellular energy allocations, energy available of each storage type and energy consumed as mJ/mg in female S. glomerata from Clyde River,

NSW Australia. Values are means and standard deviations ...... 209

Table 7.1 - Metal concentrations in sediment and two transplanted bivalves from Lake

Macquarie, NSW, Australia. Individual metals are in µg/g dry mass. Values are presented as mean ± standard error...... 245

Table 7.2 - Comparison of bioenergetic equivalents in exposed S. glomerata to those in pre-exposed , converted to percentages and designating pre-exposure as 100%

...... 256

Table 7.3 - Comparison of bioenergetic equivalents in exposed O. angasi to those in pre- exposed animals, converted to percentages and designating pre-exposure as 100% .... 256

xxiv

Table of Figures

Figure 2.1 - Distribution of S. glomerata from Atlas of Living Australia (Australia 2017)

...... 23

Figure 2.2 - Distribution of Ostrea angasi from Atlas of Living Australia (Australia

2017) ...... 26

Figure 2.3 - Distribution of C. gigas from Atlas of Living Australia 2017 (Australia

2017) ...... 28

Figure 2.4 - Distribution of M. galloprovincialis from Atlas of Living Australia, 2017

(Australia 2017) ...... 30

Figure 2.5 - Distribution of A. trapezia from Atlas of Living Australia 2017 (Australia

2017) ...... 32

Figure 2.6 - Typical structure of a generic GA demonstrating the looped process that is repeated until the optimum outcome of the quantitative modelling process is achieved.

...... 58

Figure 3.1 - Samples sites for bivalve collections in NSW, and

(Google, 2017) ...... 75

Figure 3.2 - mean (line) and standard deviation (shading) raw absorbance spectra for the five bivalve species modelled separately and then combined for the oyster and bivalve models ...... 82

Figure 3.3 – Bandwidth selection outcomes for protein modelling in S. glomerata (a), O. angasi (b), M. galloprovincialis (c), A. trapezia (d), 3 (e) and 5 bivalves (f)...... 88

Figure 3.4 - Protein modelling results for S. glomerata (a), O. angasi (b), M. galloprovincialis (c), A. trapezia (d), 3 oysters (e) and 5 bivalves (f)...... 91

xxv

Figure 3.5 - Bandwidth selection outcomes for lipid modelling in S. glomerata (a), O. angasi (b), M. galloprovincialis (c), A. trapezia (d), 3 oysters (e) and 5 bivalves (f)...... 98

Figure 3.6 - Lipid model outcome plots for S. glomerata (a), O. angasi (b), M. galloprovincialis (c), A. trapezia (d), 3 oysters (e) and 5 bivalves (f) ...... 101

Figure 3.7 - Bandwidth selection outcomes for glycogen modelling in S. glomerata (a), O. angasi (b), M. galloprovincialis (c), A. trapezia (d), 3 oysters (e) and 5 bivalves (f)...... 108

Figure 3.8 - Glycogen model outcome plots for S. glomerata (a), O. angasi (b), M. galloprovincialis (c), A. trapezia (d), 3 oysters (e) and 5 bivalves (f)...... 111

Figure 4.1 - Bandwidth selection using GA for protein (a), lipid (b), glycogen (c) and

ETS activity (d). Darker bands indicate higher correlations from spectral peaks ...... 147

Figure 4.2 - NIRS modelling outputs for measuring protein (a), lipid (b), glycogen (c) concentrations and ETS activity (d) ...... 149

Figure 4.3 - Seasonal changes in CEA (shown in the boxes) of S. glomerata in a natural environment, with temperature shown via the line. Associated data (chapter 6) indicates these changes result from decreased glycogen and lipid stores following spawning and increased ETS activity during cooler seasons. These changes are a result of increased energy demand to meet basal metabolic requirements and decreased food

(plankton)...... 153

Figure 4.4 - CEA Response in S. glomerata exposed to a known metal contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie, NSW, Australia. Plot (a) shows total sediment metal concentrations, while Plot (b) demonstrates the CEA response following a 31 day exposure. CEA decreased from the background metal concentration to the moderate metal concentration in a linear fashion, while at the high metal concentration, CEA did not decrease as much. We suspect this is due to bivalve capacity to reduce feeding and

xxvi lowered energy consumption in response to stress (see chapter 7 for more detailed analysis)...... 153

Figure 6.1 - Sampling location on the NSW coast at Clyde River, Batemans Bay, NSW

Australia...... 202

Figure 6.2 - Temperature and salinity for Clyde River from summer 2014 to mid-spring

2015...... 208

Figure 6.3 - Seasonal changes to energy stores, use and CEA in female S. glomerata from 24 month and 36 month old cohorts in the Clyde River, NSW Australia ...... 214

Figure 6.4 - Total energy stores available as a feature of relative contributions from each energy store type in female S. glomerata in the Clyde River, NSW over 4 seasons.

...... 215

Figure 7.1 - Sites selected along a metal contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie,

NSW Australia ...... 236

Figure 7.2 - Oxidative stress response of S. glomerata exposed to metal contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie, NSW Australia. “a” and “b” indicate significant differences from pre-exposure within oxidative biomarkers, with “a” indicating no significant difference and “b” indicating a significant difference over time of exposure.

...... 249

Figure 7.3 - Oxidative stress response of O. angasi exposed to metal contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie, NSW Australia. “a” and “b” indicate significant differences from pre-exposure within oxidative biomarkers, with “a” indicating no significant difference and “b” indicating a significant difference over time of exposure.

...... 250

xxvii

Figure 7.4 - Total energy stores in Saccostrea glomerata exposed to a metal contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie, NSW Australia, showing the portions of glycogen, protein and lipid...... 257

Figure 7.5 - Total energy stores in Ostrea angasi, shown as glycogen, protein and lipid, exposed to a metal contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie, NSW Australia...... 258

Figure 7.6 – Electron transport system activity (ETS) and cellular energy allocation

(CEA) for S. glomerata exposed to a contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie, NSW

Australia...... 259

Figure 7.7 – Electron transport system activity (ETS) and cellular energy allocation

(CEA) for O. angasi exposed to a contamination gradient in Lake Macquarie, NSW

Australia...... 260

Figure 7.8 - Percentage of normal embryo development of S. glomerata in Lake

Macquarie, NSW ...... 262

xxviii

Glossary of acronyms

Term Definition ATP Adenosine triphosphate BMR Basal metabolic requirements CEA Cellular energy allocation The use of mathematical and statistical methods to improve the Chemometrics understanding of chemical information and to correlate quality parameters or physical properties to analytical instrument data. ETS Electron transport system activity GA Genetic algorithm LV Latent variables NIR Near Infra-red NIRS Near Infra-red spectroscopy PCA Principal component analysis PCR Principle component regression PLS Partial least squares QX Unknown - an oyster pathogen RMSECV Root mean square error of cross validation RMSEP Root mean square error of prediction RPD Ration of performance to standard deviation RPIQ Ration of performance to the interquartile distance SD Standard deviation SE Standard Error SEC Standard error of calibration SEP Standard error of prediction SFG Scope for growth WM Winter mortality - an oyster pathogen

xxix