DOCSLIB.ORG

Differences in the Ability to Process a Visuo-Spatial Task Are Reflected In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Differences in the Ability to Process a Visuo-Spatial Task Are Reflected In Neuroscience Letters 269 (1999) 137±140 Differences in the ability to process a visuo-spatial task are re¯ected in event-related slow cortical potentials of human subjects Claus Lamm*, Herbert Bauer, Oliver Vitouch, Reinhard GstaÈ ttner Brain Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010 Vienna, Austria Received 24 March 1999; received in revised form 10 May 1999; accepted 10 May 1999 Abstract Recent positron emission tomography (PET) and electroencephalographic (EEG) studies suggest that higher ability in a cognitive task is associated with a more ef®cient neuronal processing of this task. However, the validity and general- izability of these studies is limited for several reasons. We investigated 20 male and 18 female human subjects with good vs. poor spatial ability performing a visuo-spatial task (cube test). Processing-related slow event-related potentials were recorded via 22 electrodes, evenly distributed over the scalp. Signi®cant differences between good and poor performers were found in both sexes: poor subjects showed higher activity in the parietal region, and their topography was more extended into fronto-central regions. Since the amount and topography of brain activity may vary considerably depend- ing on subjects' ability, we conclude that careful (experimental) control of task-speci®c ability of subjects is mandatory for cognitive neuroscience studies. q 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Neuronal ef®ciency; Ability; Spatial cognition; Individual differences; Event-related potentials; Slow potentials; Human cognition Having already been introduced in 1969 [4], the concept between good and poor performers was accomplished only of neuronal ef®ciency assumes that higher ability in a cogni- by means of a post-hoc median split. Also, group assign- tive task is associated with more ef®cient neuronal proces- ment was based on ability measures derived from tasks sing of this task. Several functional neuroimaging studies which were only correlated with, but not identical to those have led to revitalized speculations about this assumption. used during electrophysiological recordings. Furthermore, Positron emission tomography (PET) studies report positive of all studies cited so far, only one [11] investigated male correlations between ability and the decrease in glucose and female subjects, but no sex-speci®c analyses were metabolic rate (GMR) following training of a visuo- reported. Another PET study [6] which also investigated spatial/motor task [7], and negative correlations with both sexes shows no correlation between ability and GMR GMR during the processing of abstract reasoning [8] and in females during mathematical reasoning, but an inconsis- verbal ¯uency items [11]. Topographical recordings of slow tent positive one in males. However, the per-group sample potential shifts (SPSs) in good and poor spatial test perfor- size in this study was again rather low, the `low' ability mers, revealed less slow potential negativity in the good group was de®ned via an average mathematical ability, group over the left parieto-occipito-temporal region [14]. and groups also differed in their verbal ability. In subjects with higher reasoning scores (Raven test), less Using the method of slow potential topography [2], we event-related desynchronization, following presentation of a aimed to investigate whether the assumption of more ef®- sentence veri®cation task, was reported [10]. However, the cient processing of a visuo-spatial task in high ability generalizability of these studies is restricted for several subjects holds for both sexes. Spatial ability was chosen reasons. In the PET studies, sample sizes were rather low, since sex differences in this intellectual dimension are and no control group was investigated in the training study. well documented on in literature [17]. In two consecutive In the electroencephalographic (EEG) studies, the division studies, males [16] and females with different levels of abil- ity were investigated. In both experiments, a more sensitive separation of ability groups was achieved by pre-experi- * Corresponding author. Tel.: 143-1-427-747-829; fax: 143-1- mental selection of subjects whose test performance fell 427-747-859. either in the ®rst (poor performers) or in the fourth quartile E-mail address: [email protected] (C. Lamm) 0304-3940/99/$ - see front matter q 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S0304-3940(99)00441-3 138 C. Lamm et al. / Neuroscience Letters 269 (1999) 137±140 item presentation time was unrestricted. Starting with the button push until the response of the item, EEG was recorded via 22 Ag/AgCl electrodes evenly distributed over the scalp. Electrodes were mounted on small adapters, and the skin was scratched at each location using a sterile needle to minimize skin potential artifacts and to keep elec- trode impedance #1V. Adapters had been secured on the scalp via collodion with the help of an application cap [2], Fig. 1. Black/white sample of a dichotomized 3DC item. Correct yielding a 2 1 4 £ 5 equidistant matrix montage. While the answer: `yes' (i.e. the two cubes could be identical). positions on the median sagittal line corresponded exactly to those of the international 10±20 system, the other ones only (good performers) of the respective test calibration sample. approximated them due to the equidistance constraint In order to keep single trials short, the visuo-spatial task that (recording locations: Fp10,Fp20/F70,F30, Fz, F40,F80 / subjects had to process during EEG recordings was dichot- T30,C30,Cz,C40,T40 /T50,P30, Pz, P40,T60 /O70,O30, omized (Fig. 1), but in all other aspects identical to the one Oz, O40,O80; all referenced to linked mastoids). Electrodes version used for pre-selection (3 Dimensional Cube test, and adapters were ®lled with degassed electrolyte and, via a 3DC [5]). Since the 3DC ful®lls the criteria of the Rasch preampli®er, connected to a high input impedance ($100 model [13], it has the property of unidimensionality and GV) DC ampli®er with excellent baseline stability. EEG therefore measures the same latent cognitive dimension was sampled at 4 kHz (downsampling at 250 Hz for digital (ability) in different groups of subjects. This property was storage), and the frequency range was set from DC to 100 essential for our study since we wanted to ensure that beha- Hz (notch at 50 Hz). In order to control eye movement vioral differences between groups and sexes were based on artifacts, vertical (electrodes above and below the right `true' differences in spatial processing, and not on differ- eye) and horizontal electrooculogram (electrodes on the ences in processing strategies or other factors not attributa- outer canthi) were recorded bipolarly. After EOG correction ble to spatial cognition. using a linear regression algorithm [16], all trials (n 76 Altogether, 38 healthy right-handed [1] students aged 20± per subject on the average) were visually inspected, and 30 years participated in the two experiments (Male: good- those assessed to contain artifacts were excluded from poor 12/8; female: good/poor 10/8). Extreme groups further analyses. For all trials solved correctly, stimulus and sexes neither differed in age nor in their general verbal onset-related averages referenced to a 200 ms pre-stimulus ability and basic intelligence (tested using a brief word- baseline were computed for each subject, and topographical power test [15]; see Table 1). During the experiment, SPS amplitudes and their current source density transforms subjects were seated in a dimmed and sound-attenuated were mapped by means of a spherical-spline interpolation room. They had to process visuo-spatial items for a period algorithm [12]. For statistical analyses, seven measures of 30 min (in a separate experimental condition, they solved representing SPSs at different latencies were calculated. verbal reasoning tasks; only the results of the visuo-spatial These measures consisted of the mean DC amplitude in a condition are reported in this paper). Items appeared 2 s 200-ms interval centered around 1.9, 2.4, 2.9, 3.4, 3.9, 4.4 after pressing of a start button. Subjects had to decide and 4.9 s after stimulus onset. Since the same statistical whether two blue-painted cubes with white patterns on results (in terms of signi®cance level) were observed for their faces presented in the middle of a 1700 color computer all SPSs measures, only the results of the analyses at 4.9 s screen placed about 70 cm in front of them could be iden- will be reported on here. Greenhouse±Geisser corrected tical or not (answers `yes' or `no'). This comparison repeated-measures ANOVAs with factors sex (two levels), required the mental rotation and/or transformation of one group (two) and location (22) were computed for raw ampli- of the cubes. Since a speeded (computer-paced) item tude and z-normalized [9] values. Global ANOVA results presentation mode is known to affect unidimensionality, were evaluated in detail by six Bonferroni-corrected linear contrasts (adjusted a-level a 0.009) using speci®c error Table 1 variances [3]. Behavioral dataa Behavioral data are reported in Table 1. As for the SPS data, the ANOVA with raw amplitudes revealed signi®cant Age 3DC WPT % main effects: sex (F 1; 3411:26, P 0:002), group Female good 22.5 ^ 2.0 16.3 ^ 1.0 33.3 ^ 3.1 90.3 (F(1,34) 10.39, P 0:003) and location F 21; 714 Female poor 23.6 ^ 1.8 4.1 ^ 2.0 35.7 ^ 1.8 68.2 91.16, e 0.24, P , 0:001), signi®cant interactions sex £ Male good 23.9 ^ 2.1 16.1 ^ 0.8 36.2 ^ 1.6 93.0 location (F 21; 7142:91, e 0.24, P 0:015) and Male poor 25.8 ^ 2.8 6.1 ^ 2.2 35.8 ^ 1.8 77.0 group £ location (F 21; 7144:57, e 0.24, P , a Mean ^ STD.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enclosed Please Find the Specimen for the Main Part of Your Application (Max
    Dear Applicant: Enclosed please find the specimen for the main part of your application (max. 5 pages) for a full professorship, as required by the University of Klagenfurt. This main part typically in- cludes your application letter and the most informative professional details about yourself. It should enable the reviewers to assess the fit of your qualifications with the requirements of the advertised position in a concise manner. To facilitate the further internal processing of your application we also respectfully request that you follow the layout and formatting as provided by the specimen, preferably transmitting the document to us as a Word file. Supplementary and more extensive attachments to this main part (e. g., detailed CV and complete list of publications, certificates) are possible and indeed desirable, and will be made fully available to the appointments board and the reviewers. Concerning the significance of this specimen, particularly from page 3 onwards, please con- sider that the indicators, focuses, and cultures of different disciplines are diverse. Some of the categories given as examples here (e. g. reviewing for journals) may therefore be irrelevant for your field; other important ones (e. g. professional/industrial experience, patents) may be missing. Please use this overview as a rough guide only, and design the final three pages of the document as is customary in your field, and as you deem it informative and appropriate. Thank you for your interest in the University of Klagenfurt, and all the best for your applica- tion, Prof. Dr. Oliver Vitouch Rector of the university Mail-ad 1 Sandra Specimina, PhD University of Padua Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity Report of the Oeawi 2018
    Activity Report 2018 Activity Report OeAWI, 2018 1. Affairs of the Association Meetings: General Assembly (GA): November 29, 2018 Meetings of the Commission: May 2 and November 23, 2018 Meetings of the Working Group on Controlling and Preventing Plagiarism: June 18 and December 17, 2018 Board Meeting: November 8, 2018 Board: Helmut Denk, representing the Austrian Academy of Sciences, was re-elected in his function for another two years. Effective March 1, Jean-Robert Tyran (University of Vienna) took up the position from the Federal Minister Heinz Faßmann. Eva Blimlinger became Chair of Universities Austria (uniko) and succeeded Oliver Vitouch as Member of the Board of OeAWI in January 2018. Member Organisations: By January 1, the Institute of Advanced Studies (IHS) became full member of OeAWI. Thus, the number of member organisations comprises 38 institutions. Statutes of the OeAWI and Rules of Procedure of the Commission: The Statutes and the Rules of Procedure of the Commission were revised following a discussion at the 2017 General Assembly in a multi-stage process that began in January 2018. The reasons for the revision included removing "dead rights" and adapting the documents to actual practice in order to allocate responsibilities accordingly, as well as making the structure clearer. Karl-Gerhard Straßl and Martina Baravalle (both lawyers at mdw) were commissioned with the revision; Stephan Rixen and Elisabeth Staudegger were involved on the Commission side. In November 2018, the General Assembly approved both the revised Statutes that were resolved by the board, as well as the Rules of Procedure of the Commission. New Corporate Identity, new Website: Since summer 2018 the ÖAWI appears in a new design.
    [Show full text]
  • We As European University Leaders Wish to Reaffirm Our Commitment to International Cooperation and Exchange in This Turbulent Time for Europe
    We as European university leaders wish to reaffirm our commitment to international cooperation and exchange in this turbulent time for Europe. We are strongest when we tackle issues collaboratively, when we exchange ideas and people, and when we open our hearts and minds to new perspectives and new knowledge. Collaboration is also a cornerstone of innovation and excellence. It is by pooling infrastructure, data and expertise that we can best pursue ground-breaking research which improves people's lives and help to build strong and sustainable knowledge economies. The outcome of the UK's referendum on EU membership will mean a new relationship between the UK and the rest of Europe, but we will work together to ensure that the long-standing research and exchange relationships between Europe's universities continue, for the benefit of people across the continent. The Presidents of European Rectors' Conferences Prof. Rolf Tarrach President European Universities Association Prof. Dame Julia President Universities UK Goodfellow Prof. Dr. Horst Hippler President German Rectors' Conference Professor Jean-Loup President French Conference of University Salzmann Presidents Prof. Dr. Oliver Vitouch President Universities Austria Prof. Dr. Tomas Zima President Czech Rectors' Conference Rector Per Michael Vice Chair Universities Denmark Johansen Professor Tiit Land President Universities Estonia Professor Jouko Niinimäki President Universities Finland Professor Luc De President Flemish Interuniversity Council Schepper Dr. József Bódis President Hungarian Rectors' Conference Dr Jon Atli Benediktsson President National Rectors Conference in Iceland Prof. Don Barry President Irish Universities Association Prof. Gaetano Manfredi President Conference of Italian Universities Rectors Professor Arvids Chairman Latvian Rectors' Council Barsevskis Professor Rainer Klump President University of Luxembourg Jan Mengelers Board Member Association of Universities in the Netherlands Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition-Based Judgments and Decisions: What We Have Learned (So Far)
    Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 6, No. 5, July 2011, pp. 359–380 Recognition-based judgments and decisions: What we have learned (so far) Julian N. Marewski∗ Rüdiger F. Pohl† Oliver Vitouch‡ Abstract This special issue on recognition processes in inferential decision making represents an adversarial collaboration among the three guest editors. This introductory article to the special issue’s third and final part comes in three sections. In Section 1, we summarize the six papers that appear in this part. In Section 2, we give a wrap-up of the lessons learned. Specifically, we discuss (i) why studying the recognition heuristic has led to so much controversy, making it difficult to settle on mutually accepted empirically grounded assumptions, (ii) whether the development of the recognition heuristic and its theoretical descriptions could explain some of the past controversies and misconceptions, (iii) how additional cue knowledge about unrecognized objects could enter the decision process, (iv) why recognition heuristic theory should be complemented by a probabilistic model of strategy selection, and (v) how recognition information might be related to other information, especially when considering real-world applications. In Section 3, we present an outlook on the thorny but fruitful road to cumulative theory integration. Future research on recognition-based inferences should (i) con- verge on overcoming past controversies, taking an integrative approach to theory building, and considering theories and findings from neighboring fields (such as marketing science and artificial intelligence), (ii) build detailed computational process models of decision strategies, grounded in cognitive architectures, (iii) test existing models of such strategies competitively, (iv) design computational models of the mechanisms of strategy selection, and (v) effectively extend its scope to decision making in the wild, outside controlled laboratory situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition-Based Judgments and Decisions: Introduction to the Special Issue (Vol
    Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 4, July 2010, pp. 207–215 Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (Vol. 1) Julian N. Marewski∗ Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany Rüdiger F. Pohl Oliver Vitouch University of Mannheim, Germany University of Klagenfurt, Austria Eine neue wissenschaftliche Wahrheit pflegt sich nicht the degree of recognition or knowledge a person has of an in der Weise durchzusetzen, daß ihre Gegner überzeugt alternative; and accessibility (e.g., Bruner, 1957), fluency werden und sich als belehrt erklären, sondern vielmehr (e.g., Jacoby & Dallas, 1981), or availability (e.g., Tver- dadurch, daß die Gegner allmählich aussterben und daß sky & Kahneman, 1973), which often refers to the ease die heranwachsende Generation von vornherein mit der or speed with which mental content comes to mind. Wahrheit vertraut gemacht ist. Max Planck (1948, p. 22) [A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its 2 The Recognition Heuristic and opponents and making them see the light, but rather be- the Fast and Frugal Heuristics cause its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.]1 Framework I suppose the process of acceptance will pass through the One model that operates on a sense of recognition is usual four stages: the recognition heuristic (Goldstein & Gigerenzer, 1999, i) this is worthless nonsense; 2002; see also Gigerenzer & Goldstein, 1996). This sim- ii) this is an interesting, but perverse, point of view; ple, noncompensatory decision strategy can be applied iii) this is true, but quite unimportant; to infer which of N alternatives, some recognized others 2 iv) I always said so.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008:Berlin, Germany
    International Union of Psychological Science Union Internationale de Psychologie Scientifique Minutes Meeting of the IUPsyS General Assembly Berlin, Germany 2008 July 21, July 23 AGENDA 1. Call to Order: Roll call to certify Delegates and identify Affiliates and Guests 2. Adoption of the Agenda 3. Membership issues 4. Minutes 5. Report of the President 6. Report of the Secretary-General 7. Report of the Treasurer 8. Statutes and Rules of Procedure 9. Nominations and Elections 10. Standing Committee on Strategic Planning 11. International Congresses of Psychology 12. Universal Declaration of Ethical Principles for Psychologists 13. Standing Committee on Publications and Communications 14. Standing Committee on Capacity Building 15. Regional Conferences of Psychology 16. International Council for Science (ICSU) 17. International Social Science Council (ISSC) 18. United Nations (UN) 19. World Health Organization (WHO) 20. World Forum 21. Time and place of the next Assembly meeting: 22. Adjournment Assembly Delegates Numbers present: 69 (session 1); 72 (session 2) Country (delegates) Names (Sessions attended) Argentina (1) Maria Cristina Richaud de Minzi (1, 2) Australia (2) Amanda Gordon, Trang Thomas (1, 2) Austria (2) Oliver Vitouch, Christoph Kabas, (1, 2) Belgium (2) Jan De Houwver, Gery d’Ydewalle (1, 2) Canada (2) Janel Gauthier, John Berry (1, 2) China (2) Xiolan Fu (1,2); Buxin Han (1), Xianghong Sun (2) Colombia (1) Ruben Ardila (1, 2) Croatia Hrove Gligora (1, 2) Czech Republic Daniel Heller (1, 2) Denmark (2) Roal Ulrichson; Arne
    [Show full text]
  • DRC Newsletter May 2015
    DRC Newsletter May 2015 http://us10.campaign-archive1.com/?u=77da7b4f3e8e4d0eff287aa6f&i... Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate DRC Newsletter May 2015 View this email in your browser Dear subscribers to the DRC Newsletter! Spring has finally arrived in the Danube region. With this edition we would like to draw your attention to several interesting opportunities to participate in events and we kindly ask you to circulate them in your networks! Feedback and comments are welcome! 1. REMINDER: 12TH DRC SUMMER SCHOOL ON REGIONAL CO-OPERATION 2. 1st Danube:Future Workshop successfully organized in Klagenfurt 3. 5th Danube eRegion Conference - DeRC 2015 4. Staff Training Week of University of Maribor 5. 3rd International Danube Conference on Culture, Timisoara, 24 - 26 June 2015 6. Straniak Academy Ulcinj/Montenegro 7. Summer School: Alternative Economic and Monetary Systems 8. Summer School: Green.Building.Solutions. 9. PRESENTATION OF DRC MEMBER UNIVERSITIES - University of Natural resources and life sciences Vienna (BOKU), Austria 1 von 9 13.05.2015 10:25 DRC Newsletter May 2015 http://us10.campaign-archive1.com/?u=77da7b4f3e8e4d0eff287aa6f&i... Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate 1. REMINDER: 12TH DRC SUMMER SCHOOL ON REGIONAL CO-OPERATION Apply now: For the next DRC Summer School in Vienna July 05-12 2015. The DRC Summer School promotes regional co-operation among young scholars to establish a network of young scholars who deal with the issue of regional co-operation. The 12th edition of the Summer School has the main topic: “Recent political changes and their implications in the Danube Region” Applications for participation may be handed in by e-mail or fax until June 7, 2015 and should include the application form, the CV of the applicant and an abstract max.
    [Show full text]
  • Werkstattbericht 33 IMPRESSUM Medieninhaber Und Herausgeber: Ombudsstelle Für Studierende (OS) Für Den Inhalt Verantwortlich: Dr
    – WIRKMÄCHTIGE HOCHSCHUL(AMTS)SPRACHE: MÜNDIGE STUDIERENDE? DIALOG! Werkstattbericht 33 IMPRESSUM Medieninhaber und Herausgeber: Ombudsstelle für Studierende (OS) Für den Inhalt verantwortlich: Dr. Josef Leidenfrost, MA Bei der Erstellung dieser Broschüre haben mitgewirkt: Cindy Keler (OS), Alberina Nuka (OS), Ihnen sei herzlich dafür gedankt. Titelblattgestaltung: Christian Smetana, Wien Innen-Layout: Alberina Nuka, OS 1. Auflage, 1. November 2019 Auflage: 200 Stück Herstellung: BMBWF Weitere Exemplare können kostenlos bei der Ombudsstelle für Studierende bestellt werden, per E-Mail [email protected] oder per Telefon 01-53120-5544 Werkstattberichte der Ombudsstelle für Studierende: Neben der Betreuung von individuellen Problemfällen an Universitäten und Hochschulen gehört auch der institutionalisierte Dialog mit den Entscheidungsträgerinnen und -trägern sowie Mitarbeiterin- nen und Mitarbeitern der Institutionen vor Ort zu den Hauptaufgaben der Ombudsstelle für Studierende. Dazu gibt es pro Kalenderjahr innerhalb des Jahresprogrammes der Ombudsstelle für Studierende mehre- re Spezialveranstaltungen, die sowohl generellen Arbeitsbereichen als auch Sonderthemen gewidmet sind. Ab dem Studienjahr 2008/2009 gab die Studierendenanwaltschaft, die Vorgängereinrichtung der Ombudsstelle für Studie- rende, in diesem Zusammenhang als neues Informationsmedium die sogenannten Werkstattberichte über die Erfahrungen aus der Alltagsarbeit und aus den Kontakten mit Studierenden heraus. Darin wurden Präsentationen und Ergebnisse der einschlägigen
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 1. Affairs of the Association Meetings: General Assembly (GA): October 16 Meetings of the Commission: May 12, October 23, and November 24 Meetings of the Working Group on Controlling and Preventing Plagiarism: May 4 and December 4 Board Meetings: April 27, October 12, and December 5 Board: At the General Assembly of October 16, the President of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), Prof. Dr. Klement Tockner, was unanimously elected to the position of new chair of the Association. He thus succeeded Prof. Dr. Christine Mannhalter, who had held this position since 2014. PD Dr. Monika Schmoll (AIT), representing non-university institutions on the Board, was re-elected in her function for another two years. Effective December 18, Prof. Dr. Heinz Faßmann (University of Vienna) terminated his work on the Board following his appointment as Federal Minister of Education, Science, and Research. In addition, Prof. Dr. Oliver Vitouch resigned from his position on the Board of the Austrian Agency for Research Integrity (OeAWI) due to the fact that his chairmanship of Universities Austria (uniko) ended at the end of the calendar year. Administrative Office-Staff: From mid-March to the end of July, Mag. Alexandra Mariotti worked at the admin office of the Association for 20 hours a week. In October Mag. Sabine Schnetzinger succeeded her; she has been working in a support function at the office for 30 hours a week. OeAWI Annual Report 2017 2 2. Raising Awareness and Prevention Working Group on Controlling and Preventing Plagiarism: During 2017, the working group met twice. At the first meeting on May 4, Karl-Gerhard Straßl (University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna/mdw) gave a presentation on ghostwriting.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition-Based Judgments and Decisions: Introduction to the Special Issue (II)
    Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 6, No. 1, February 2011, pp. 1–6 Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (II) Julian N. Marewski∗ Rüdiger F. Pohl† Oliver Vitouch‡ 1 Introduction Erdfelder, Küpper-Tetzel, and Mattern (2011) aim to fill this gap (see also, e.g., Pleskac, 2007; Schooler We are pleased to present Part II of this Special Issue & Hertwig, 2005) by studying the recognition heuris- of Judgment and Decision Making on recognition pro- tic from the perspective of a two-high-threshold model cesses in inferential decision making. In addition, it is of recognition memory (Bredenkamp & Erdfelder, 1996; our pleasure to announce that there will be a third part, Snodgrass & Corwin, 1988) that belongs to the class providing, among other contents, comments on the arti- of multinomial processing tree models (Batchelder & cles published in Parts I and II as well as on the broader Riefer, 1990; Erdfelder et al., 2009). Following this scholarly debates reflected by these articles (Table 1). We two-high-threshold model, Erdfelder et al. (2011) assume have therefore decided to keep this introduction to Part II that recognition judgments can arise from two types of short. cognitive states: (i) certainty states in which recognition Part II contains 7 articles, featuring a range of new judgments are strongly correlated with memory strength experimental tests of Goldstein and Gigerenzer’s (1999, (including certainty for recognition with high memory 2002; Gigerenzer & Goldstein, 1996) recognition heuris- strength as well as certainty for non-recognition with low tic, which is the model of recognition-based judgments memory strength) and (ii) uncertainty states in which and decisions that is central to almost all articles pub- recognition judgments reflect guessing rather than differ- lished in the parts of this special issue (Table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Learning of Acoustic Instrument Recognition Lisa Aufegger,*1 Oliver Vitouch*2 *Dept
    Tales of Talent: Rapid Learning of Acoustic Instrument Recognition Lisa Aufegger,*1 Oliver Vitouch*2 *Dept. of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected], [email protected] respect, can strongly depend on the sub-domain in focus. While ABSTRACT adequate relative pitch seems to be a well-trainable property (with few genetically based exceptions), the ability of absolute st Also in the 21 century, the role of innate talents in music remains a pitch seems to be largely unattainable by training in post-critical matter of fundamental debate. Within the framework of the “rapid ages. Many authors favor an early-learning account of absolute learning paradigm”, the aim of this study was to find out whether it is pitch (Russo, Windell, & Cuddy, 2003; Takeuchi & Hulse, possible to simply and quickly teach non-musicians musical skills in 1993; Vitouch, 2003; Ward, 1999) with a sensitive period for the perceptual realm, specifically the recognition of instruments’ acquisition up to age 6. Also the characteristics of the first timbres. Within a week, 34 subjects had three feedback-driven computer-based training sessions, where they were asked to language acquired seem to play an eminent role as soon as tone discriminate between 10 brass and woodwind instruments. In the pre- languages (e.g., Mandarin) are involved (Deutsch, Henthorn, and a post-test, subjects had to recognize the main instrument from an Marvin, & Xu, 2006; Deutsch, Dooley, Henthorn, & Head, orchestral piece. Results shown that non-musicians did not fully reach 2009). Additionally, there may indeed be a genetic factor expert level (benchmarked by brass or woodwind instrument students) involved here, which remains to be discovered (Levitin & after this short period, but performed well at par with semi-experts Rogers, 2005a, 2005b; Zatorre, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Eua Annual Report 2017
    EUA ANNUAL REPORT 2017 JUNE 2018 Table of Contents Message from the President ................................................................................................... 1 Foreword from the Secretary General .................................................................................... 2 SECTION 1: EUA Activities in 2017 .......................................................................................... 3 A: Universities in the European Higher Education Area ......................................................... 3 B: Research and Innovation: Universities in the European Research Area ........................... 7 C: University Governance, Autonomy and Funding ............................................................... 12 D: European Universities in the Neighbourhood and Beyond .............................................. 15 E: EUA in a Changing Political Context ................................................................................. 18 F: EUA Special Services ........................................................................................................ 20 G: Communicating EUA’s Messages ..................................................................................... 21 SECTION 2: EUA as an Organisation ..................................................................................... 25 A: EUA Board ......................................................................................................................... 25 B: EUA Council .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]