DOCSLIB.ORG

Ultraviolet a Does Not Induce Melanomas in a Xiphophorus Hybrid fish Model

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ultraviolet a Does Not Induce Melanomas in a Xiphophorus Hybrid fish Model Ultraviolet A does not induce melanomas in a Xiphophorus hybrid fish model David L. Mitchella,b,1, André A. Fernandeza, Rodney S. Nairna,b, Rachel Garciaa, Lakshmi Panikera, David Tronoa, Howard D. Thamesb,c, and Irma Gimenez-Contia,b aDepartment of Carcinogenesis, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX 78957; bGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas, Houston TX 77225; and cDepartment of Biostatistics,University of Texas, Houston, TX 77024 Edited* by James E. Cleaver, University of California, San Francisco, CA, and approved April 13, 2010 (received for review January 8, 2010) We examined the wavelength dependence of ultraviolet (UV) ra- domestica) and several genetically modified mouse models, dem- diation (UVR)-induced melanoma in a Xiphophorus backcross hy- onstrate that UVA does not induce melanomas (5–7). In contrast, brid model previously reported to be susceptible to melanoma in- evidence from all of these models, including Xiphophorus, sup- duction by ultraviolet A (UVA) and visible light. Whereas ultraviolet ports a role for UVB in the etiology of melanoma. Unlike placental B (UVB) irradiation of neonates yielded high frequencies of mela- mammals, fish are very efficient at removing UVB-induced direct nomas in pigmented fish, UVA irradiation resulted in melanoma damage in DNA using photoenzymatic repair (PER) (8, 9) and this frequencies that were not significantly different from unirradiated mechanism greatly decreases melanoma formation in the Xipho- fish. Spontaneous and UV-induced melanoma frequencies corre- phorus melanoma model (1, 3). The most abundant damage in- lated with the degree of pigmentation as expected from previous duced by UVB irradiation results from the direct absorption of studies, and the histopathology phenotypes of the melanomas photons by DNA and includes the formation of cyclobutane py- were not found in significantly different proportions in UV-treated rimidine dimers (CPD) and (6-4) pyrimidine dimers [(6-4)PD] (10, and -untreated tumor-bearing fish. Our results support the conclu- 11). Collectively, the results from the vast majority of animal sion that a brief early-life exposure to UVB radiation causes mela- studies strongly suggest that one (or both) of these lesions is re- noma formation in this animal model. These data are consistent quired for melanoma formation. with an essential role for direct DNA damage, including cyclobutane Xiphophorus offers some significant advantages over other ani- dimers and (6-4) photoproducts, in the etiology of melanoma. mal models for investigating melanoma. The classical, spontaneous MEDICAL SCIENCES Xiphophorus hybrid melanoma model has been studied for over ultraviolet B | DNA damage | cyclobutane dimer | reactive oxygen 80 years and offers powerful genetic and biochemical approaches species | melanin for revealing determinants of melanomagenesis (12–14). The Xi- phophorus melanoma receptor kinase gene (XMRK)behavesas n the late 1980s Setlow and coworkers used genetic hybrids a dominant oncogene in this fish model and is a mutated derivative Ifrom interspecific crosses involving several species of the fish of the fish ortholog for the human epidermal growth factor receptor genus Xiphophorus to investigate the effects of UVR on the in- (EGFR/ErbB-1). Consistent with the activity of mammalian EGFR duction of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) (1). These in melanocytes (15–17), activation of the XMRK oncoprotein leads pioneering studies demonstrated that ultraviolet B (UVB) irra- to numerous downstream signaling cascades including, but not li- diation of backcross hybrids generated from a specific genetic mited to, the RAS/RAF/MAPK and PI3-K/AKT signaling path- crossing scheme induced melanomas at significant frequencies ways (12). In addition to these signaling cascades, the transformed above spontaneous levels. These results were later confirmed, phenotype in Xiphophorus also involves participation of transcrip- and the genetic basis of UVB-induced melanoma susceptibility tion factors (e.g., STAT5) and glycoproteins (e.g., osteopontin, in this cross was recognized to be the same as in the well-studied OPN) that are intimately involved in cellular proliferation and spontaneous Xiphophorus hybrid melanoma model (2). In 1993, antiapoptotic responses that characterize numerous human can- Setlow used a different Xiphophorus interspecies cross (desig- cers. Hence, Xiphophorus hybrid models offer ideal experimental nated as Sp-couchianus; Fig. 1) to study the wavelength de- platforms to further elucidate the biochemistry underlying mela- pendence of melanoma induction and reported that wavelengths nomagenesis within the context of a controlled genetic background. in the ultraviolet A (UVA) and visible ranges were effective in A recent publication (18) exploited the same Xiphophorus Sp- fi inducing melanomas in rst-generation backcross (BC1) hybrids couchianus hybrid melanoma model used by Setlow for UVA in- generated from this particular cross (3). An action spectrum for duction studies (3) to investigate photosensitization of melanin as melanoma induction was proposed with maxima in the UVB a possible mechanism for melanoma formation. In this report, (302/313 nm) and UVA (365 nm) ranges. Because UVA fluence electron paramagnetic resonance was used to describe the UVR is quantitatively much greater than UVB in sunlight incident to wavelength dependence of reactive melanin radical formation in ’ ∼ the earth s surface ( 10-fold), Setlow suggested that, on the basis pigmented fish skin. The action spectrum for melanin-sensitized of this action spectrum, UVA was more effective than UVB in generation of reactive radicals derived from these experiments causing melanomas in the human population (2, 4). This report positively correlated with the action spectrum for melanoma for- fi had signi cant public health consequences; it suggested that the mation reported by Setlow (3). These results are consistent with use of commercially available sunscreens that effectively blocked a role for UVB and UVA in generating melanin-derived reactive UVB but not UVA encouraged more lengthy recreational sun- light exposure and thereby increased the exposure to UVA and its associated risks. Over the past 20 years, these data have be- Author contributions: D.L.M. and R.S.N. designed research; D.L.M., R.G., L.P., and D.T. come central to the debate on the role of UVA in melanoma and performed research; D.L.M., A.A.F., R.S.N., L.P., H.D.T., and I.G.-C. analyzed data; and the risks associated with recreational and artificial exposures to D.L.M., A.A.F., R.S.N., H.D.T., and I.G.-C. wrote the paper. UVA wavelengths. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Debate over the action spectrum for melanoma has only in- *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor. tensified because subsequent research using a variety of animal 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. models has not corroborated these results. Studies in mammalian This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. models, including the South American opossum (Monodelphis 1073/pnas.1000324107/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1000324107 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 melanoma frequency = 44.3%; control: 40 tumor bearing fish out of 216 individuals, melanoma frequency = 18.5%; χ2 = 31.99, P < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in melanoma incidence between the UVA-irradiated fish and that of the control fish (UVA: 35 tumor-bearing fish out of 282 individuals, melanoma frequency = 12.4%; control: 40 tumor-bearing fish out of 216 individuals, melanoma frequency = 18.5%; χ2 = 3.57, P > 0.05) Therefore, our results contradict the report of Setlow and col- leagues (3) and indicate that UVB but not UVA significantly induces melanomas in this Xiphophorus melanoma model (Fig. 2). We used doses of 6.4 and 80 kJ/m2 UVB and UVA, respectively, for each of the five UV treatments; Setlow and colleagues used a dose range of 0.35–3.0 and 0.5–11.75 kJ/m2 313 (UVB) and 365 (UVA), respectively, for their treatments. Because of differences in emission spectra and dosimetry, these doses are not directly comparable. However, on the basis of our toxicity and DNA Fig. 1. The Sp-couchianus backcross hybrid breeding scheme. F1 hybrids are damage determinations, our incident doses are equal to or exceed produced by mating a macromelanophore pigmented “spotted side” (Sp/ those of Setlow et al. (3). Sp) X. maculatus female from strain Jp 163 B (Upper Left)toaX. couchianus (Xc) male not carrying the Sp allele (+/+) (Upper Right), therefore not Exposure of Neonates to UVA or UVB Did Not Affect the Degree of exhibiting any macromelanophore pigmentation. F1 hybrids are back- Adult Pigmentation. The degree of pigmentation was visually es- crossedtoeithermaleorfemaleX. couchianus individuals and produce BC1 fi i ≈ timated in each sh by two observers (L.P. and D.T.) as ( ) light progeny of which 50% exhibit the Sp (spotted side) (Sp/+) and 50% the – ii – wild-type (+/+) pigment phenotypes. with 50 70% coverage, ( ) intermediate with 70 90% coverage, and (iii) heavy with >90% coverage. The distribution of pig- mentation in the different experimental groups was determined oxygen species (ROS) in melanoma causation. However, the ob- at 4 months and at the time of sacrifice at 12–14 months (Table servation that virtually all other animal models developed to study 1). From Table 1, it is clear that the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Dosimetry and Epidemiology
    Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Dosimetry and Epidemiology Dr. Elizabeth Cahoon Earl Stadtman Investigator Radiation Epidemiology Branch Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics [email protected] DCEG Radiation Epidemiology and Dosimetry Course 2019 www.dceg.cancer.gov/RadEpiCourse Overview . Background on UV radiation (UVR) . UVR exposure assessment . Health risks . Health benefits . Summary 2 Background on UV radiation 3 Public health importance . Prevention (identify susceptible populations) . Consumer products . Medical radiation guidelines . Insights into carcinogenesis 4 Annual economic burden of skin cancer in the United States . Treatment: $8.1 billion (Guy et al., 2015) . $4.8 billion for keratinocyte carcinomas (basal and squamous cell skin cancer) . $3.3 billion for melanoma U.S. Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer (2014) UV radiation exposure assessment 6 http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/electromagnetic-fields-fact-sheet 7 Solar radiation spectrum 95% of UVA: 315-400 nm 5% of UVB: 280-315 nm Individual measures of UVR . Susceptibility (light skin/hair/eye pigmentation) . Self-reported time outdoors . Outdoor/indoor occupation . Tanning bed use . Lack of sunscreen use/protective clothing . Sunburns 9 Environmental measures of UVR . Proximity to the Equator . Ambient UVR . Ground-based . Satellite-based 10 . Satellite circled Earth once a day near noontime . Validated by ground-based measurements . 10 latitude by 10 longitude global grid . Several wavelengths available Nimbus -7 Satellite (1978-1993) Satellite-based ambient UVR . Earth-sun distance . Time of year . Latitude . Column ozone . Cloud optical thickness http://toms.gsfc.nasa.gov/n7toms/nim7toms_v8.html 12 Satellite-based erythemal exposure model http://macuv.gsfc.nasa.gov/doc/erynotes.pdf UV radiation spectrum UVA: 320-400 nm 95% reaches Earth’s surface UVB: 290-320 nm 5% reaches Earth’s surface UVC: 100-290 nm 0% reaches Earth’s surface Skin erythema (reddening) response to various UVR wavelengths UVB UVA Characteristics of UVB .
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Communiqué Vi Ultraviolet Radiation Damage and Oxidative Stress in Skin Cancer
    SCIENTIFIC COMMUNIQUÉ VI ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION DAMAGE AND OXIDATIVE STRESS IN SKIN CANCER. October 2020 Introduction Despite government campaigns to curb increases, current statistics show the rate of skin cancer is escalating, particularly in regions with predominantly fair-skinned populations. Skin cancer diagnoses have increased considerably over the last five decades, at a rate of 4% per annum. Approximately 5.3 million individuals are diagnosed with a skin cancer in the USA annually. Two in three Australians will be diagnosed with a form of skin cancer by the age of 70. Advances in molecular genetics in recent decades have led to a better understanding of the aetiology of skin cancers, which must now be used to help combat the rise of these life- threatening conditions. Skin cancers are an abnormal growth of cells within skin tissue. As discussed in SCIENTIFIC COMMUNIQUÉ IV there are three main types of skin cancer: basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and various forms of melanoma. Common to all three is a pathogenesis which is underpinned by overexposure of skin to genotoxic agents. Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the major source, with increasing evidence showing that high energy visible (HEV) light is also a contributor. Both UVR and HEV light damage skin integrity, but their effect on cellular DNA is arguably the most detrimental: initiating DNA specific chemical alterations, which leave cells unstable - the preliminary step in cancer formation. The human body has evolved DNA repair systems that identify and restore these impairments, but the capacity of these DNA repair mechanisms is limited, with excessive DNA damage associated with inefficient restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ultraviolet Radiation and Tyrosine Stimulated Melanogenesis in the Induction of Oxidative Stress Alterations in Fair Skin Melanocytes I
    200 Experimental Oncology 31, 200–208, 2009 (December) Exp Oncol 2009 31, 4, 200–208 THE ROLE OF ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION AND TYROSINE STIMULATED MELANOGENESIS IN THE INDUCTION OF OXIDATIVE STRESS ALTERATIONS IN FAIR SKIN MELANOCYTES I. Baldea1, *, T. Mocan1, R. Cosgarea2 1Department of Physiology, 2Department of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca 400006, Romania Background: Melanocytes are producing melanin after UV irradiation as a defense mechanism. However, UV-induced damage is involved in melanoma initiation, depending on skin phototype. Melanocytes seem to be extremely susceptible to free radicals. Their main enzymatic antioxidants are superoxide dismutase and catalase. Aim: To study how melanin synthesis modulates the activity of the oxidative stress defense enzymes and cell proliferation after UV induced cell damage. Methods: Normal human melanocyte cultures from fair skin individuals were exposed to high levels of L-tyrosine and irradiated, with 20, 30, 40 mJ/cm2 UVA, and respective UVB. Proliferation was measured using a MTS assay; viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion dye method. Spectrophotometrical methods were used to determine total melanin content, the enzymatic activity of tyrosinase, su- peroxide dismutase and catalase. Results: Tyrosine had a negative effect on proliferation, enhanced with time elapsed. Overall, UV irradiation decreased proliferation. UVA increased proliferation relative to UVB in the cultures exposed for a longer time to high (2 mM) tyrosine concentration. There were no proliferation differences between UVA and UVB irradiation in lower tyrosine concentration exposed melanocytes. Both, UV irradiation and tyrosine increased melanogenesis. Exposure of the melanocytes to increased levels of tyrosine in medium (0.5 mM and 1 mM) and UV irradiation enhanced the activity of superoxide dismutase and catalase.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences
    ISSN: 0975-8585 Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences Sunscreens Containing Various Herbs For Protecting Skin From UV Sunray. Zainab Tuama Al-Dallee, and Kawther T. Khalaf*. Pharmacognosay Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Basra, Basra, Iraq, 2Clinical laboratory science Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Basra, Basra, Iraq. ABSTRACT Overexposure to sun ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the main external cause of skin damage, and thus it is a factor in aging skin and increasing the risk of skin cancer, which speeds up skin aging and raises the risk of skin cancer. The students have tended to use sunscreens containing plant extracts as a substitute for sunscreen that contains organic compounds causing allergic. Plant‐based sunscreens are used to protect skin cells and DNA damage from UV rays due to they contain antioxidant compounds that restricts free radical activity. In addition to their antioxidant properties, plant‐products contain polyphenols like flavonoids and carotenoids. Therefore, the aim of the research is to present a review of the plant species generally applied in sunblock to save the skin from UV rays of the sunlight. Keywords: Ultraviolet radiation, Skin damage, Natural sun blocker, DNA damages https://doi.org/10.33887/rjpbcs/2021.12.2.4 *Corresponding author March – April 2021 RJPBCS 12(2) Page No. 19 ISSN: 0975-8585 INTRODUCTION Herbs have been known since ancient times for their ability to treat, improve and decorate skin diseases, so they have been used in cosmetics [1]. Given the fact that ultraviolet (UV) radiation rays play a role in causing sunburn, wrinkles, premature aging, and reducing immunity to infection and cancer, there is constant need for UV protection and prevention of its side effects [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Associations Between Environmental Factors and Incidence of Cutaneous Melanoma
    Volkovova et al. Environmental Health 2012, 11(Suppl 1):S12 http://www.ehjournal.net/content/11/S1/S12 REVIEW Open Access Associations between environmental factors and incidence of cutaneous melanoma. Review Katarina Volkovova1*†, Dagmar Bilanicova1,2†, Alena Bartonova3†, Silvia Letašiová4, Maria Dusinska1,3† From HENVINET (Health and Environment Network) final conference Brussels, Belgium. 14 April 2010 - 15 April 2010 Abstract Background: Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most serious skin cancers. It is caused by neural crest-derived melanocytes - pigmented cells normally present in the epidermis and, sometimes, in the dermis. Methods: We performed a review of current knowledge on the risk factors of cutaneous melanoma. Relevant studies were identified using the PubMed, Science Direct, Medline, Scopus, Scholar Google and ISI Web of Knowledge databases. Results: Melanoma incurs a considerable public health burden owing to the worldwide dramatic rise in incidence since the mid-1960s. Ultraviolet radiation exposure is the predominant environmental risk factor. The role of geographical (latitude) and individual factors such as skin type, life style, vitamin D levels and antioxidant protection, sunburn, and exposure to other environmental factors possibly contributing to melanoma risk (such as cosmetics including sunscreen, photosensitising drugs, and exogenous hormones) are reviewed in this article. Recently, both rare high risk susceptibility genes and common polymorphic genes contributing to melanoma risk have been identified. Conclusions: Cutaneous melanoma is a complex cancer with heterogeneous aetiology that continues to increase in incidence. Introduction of new biomarkers may help to elucidate the mechanism of pathogenesis and individual susceptibility to the disease, and make both prevention and treatment more effective.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of DNA Repair and Whole Genome Amplification in Forensically Relevant Samples
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Addressing Quality and Quantity: The Role of DNA Repair and Whole Genome Amplification in Forensically Relevant Samples Author(s): Bruce Budowle Document No.: 249511 Date Received: December 2015 Award Number: 2010-DN-BX-K227 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this federally funded grant report available electronically. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Federal Agency: Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice Federal Grant: Award Number 2010-DN-BX-K227 Project Title: Addressing Quality and Quantity: the Role of DNA Repair and Whole Genome Amplification in Forensically Relevant Samples Final Report PI: Bruce Budowle, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Institute of Applied Genetics, Department of Forensic and Investigative Genetics, Fort Worth, TX 76107 tel: 817-735-2979; email: [email protected] Submission Date: May 30, 2013 DUNS Number: 110091808 EIN: 1756064033A1 Recipient Organization: University of North Texas Health Science Center 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76107 Institutional Profile Number: 6108502 Project/Grant Period: 10/01/2010-06/30/2013 Final Progress Report Date: 06/30/2013 Signature: Bruce Budowle, Ph.D. 1 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer
    THE SURGEON GENERAL’S CALL TO ACTION TO PREVENT SKIN CANCER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES U.S. Public Health Service Office of the Surgeon General Suggested Citation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent Skin Cancer. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2014. This publication is available at http://www.surgeongeneral.gov. b THE SURGEON GENERAL’S CALL TO ACTION TO PREVENT SKIN CANCER ii Message from the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Skin cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States, yet most cases are preventable. Every year in the United States, nearly 5 million people are treated for skin cancer, at an estimated cost of $8.1 billion. Melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer, causes nearly 9,000 deaths each year. Despite recent efforts to address risk factors, skin cancer rates continue to rise. While those with lighter skin are more susceptible, anyone can get skin cancer—and it can be serious, even deadly. As a skin oncologist who worked in this field for many years, I have cared for both young and old with skin cancers. Almost all of the conditions were caused by unnecessary ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure, usually from excessive time in the sun or from the use of indoor tanning devices. It is alarming that every year, nearly one out of every three young white women aged 16–25 engages in indoor tanning.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Radiation and Skin Cancer Risk – Biophysical Insights
    SOLAR RADIATION AND SKIN CANCER RISK – BIOPHYSICAL INSIGHTS EMANUELA MICU Dermatology Department, Humanitas Clinic, Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Solar radiation is the main environmental risk factor for skin cancer, whose incidence is rapidly increasing in the latest decades. Individuals carry different skin cancer risk, depending mainly on the skin color (melanin type and distribution) and therefore Fitzpatrick skin typing is a widely used method to predict skin cancer risk. However, this method has its limitations as other factors are involved in skin cancer susceptibility, like genetic factors (MC1R variants) or DNA damage repair mechanisms. Thus, there is an urgent need for implementing objective, non-invasive methods to assess skin sensitivity and reactivity to sun exposure. In this review, I will analyze the main factors involved in photoprotection and the new devices currently employed to evaluate the response to ultraviolet radiation (in terms of erythema and pigmentation) and thus to predict skin cancer risk. Key words: skin cancer, ultraviolet radiation, melanin, reflectance spectrophotometer. INTRODUCTION Humans spend about half of their lives exposed to the sun. However, only in the beginning of the 20th century, carcinogenetic effects of sunlight on skin (photocarcinogenesis) started to be recognized [3]. Currently, sun exposure is the only known readily modifiable risk factor for skin cancer [27, 34, 36]. Sun-seeking behavior observed in the latest decades, along with an increased surveillance of pigmented lesions, are considered to be responsible for the rapid increase in skin cancer incidence [26]. On the other side, light has been used in photomedicine since ancient times and sun exposure is the main source for vitamin D in humans, with a long list of beneficial effects for human health [19].
    [Show full text]
  • Current Trends in Photoprotection - a New Generation of Oral Photoprotectors
    6 The Open Dermatology Journal, 2011, 5, 6-14 Open Access Current Trends in Photoprotection - A New Generation of Oral Photoprotectors Salvador Gonzalez*,1,2, Yolanda Gilaberte3, Neena Philips4 and Angeles Juarranz5 1Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA 2Dermatology Service, Ramon y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain 3Dermatology Service, Hospital San Jorge, Huesca, Spain 4School of Natural Sciences, University College, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, USA 5Biology Department, Sciences School, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain Abstract: This review provides an overview of important concepts and trends in photoprotection. From the use of protective clothing to latest-generation oral photoprotectives, this article covers these topics from two points of view: 1) the physical blockade (absorption and/or reflection) of UV photons by topical sunscreens; 2) topical compounds with antioxidant properties that thereby protect of the consequences of UV-mediated photooxidation. The last section is devoted to the development of strong antioxidant oral compounds and discusses their possibilities as adjuvants in skin protection and repair and regeneration. Keywords: Photoprotection, sunscreens, oral antioxidants, dietary photoprotectants. INTRODUCTION complexes that absorb, reflect, or scatter high-energy UV photons. Consequently, the major components of most UV filters (“sunscreens”) are designed to protect the skin topical sunscreens include barrier components as described from the harmful effects of solar radiation, particularly the above. However, most sunscreens cannot stop the lower- UV band. UV radiation can be roughly divided into two energy UV photons that cause photoaging. These photons do segments according to wavelength: UVB (~290-320 nm) and not cause erythema, but they can induce immunosupression UVA (~320-400 nm).
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of UV Radiation and Exposure in Melanoma Ashley Wysong MD, MS Founding Chairman William W
    The Role of UV Radiation and Exposure in Melanoma Ashley Wysong MD, MS Founding Chairman William W. Bruce MD Distinguished Chair of Dermatology UNMC College of Medicine, Department of Dermatology Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Courtesy) Department of Pathology/Microbiology (Courtesy) UNMC College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology University of Nebraska Graduate Faculty, Cancer Biology Disclosures Nature of Relevant Financial Commercial Interest Relationship What was received For what role • Research Grant • Castle Biosciences • Investigator (pending) SEER Melanoma New Cases & Deaths 1992 - 2018 SEER Incidence (rate per 100,000) 2013 - 2017 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 White Black Asian/PI American Indian/Alaska Hispanic Native U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool; UNMC Department of Dermatology CDC/NCI www.cdc.gov/cancer/dataviz, June 2019 Trends in Melanoma • Epidemiologic studies show an increase in melanoma incidence primarily among white populations – Believed 2/2 sun exposure and changing recreational behaviors + tanning bed exposures – Increased surveillance • The lifetime risk of melanoma = 1 in 28 • Annual increases in melanoma incidence vary from 3-7% per year = a doubling of rates every 10-20 years • Annually melanoma costs approx $3.3 billion Nikolaou 2014; Garbe 2009, Glazer 2017 Known Risk Factors for Melanoma Genetics Environment Skin Type I, II Ultraviolet Radiation – Light hair, light eyes, – Lifetime freckling – Intermittent intense UV Family Hx 2x increased risk exposure – 30-40% from
    [Show full text]
  • Induced DNA Damage, Mutagenesis, and Cancer
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Chemically- Induced DNA Damage, Mutagenesis, and Cancer Edited by Ashis K. Basu and Takehiko Nohmi Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in IJMS www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Chemically-Induced DNA Damage, Mutagenesis, and Cancer Chemically-Induced DNA Damage, Mutagenesis, and Cancer Special Issue Editors Ashis K. Basu Takehiko Nohmi MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editors Ashis K. Basu Takehiko Nohmi University of Connecticut National Institute of Health Sciences USA Japan Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal International Journal of Molecular Sciences (ISSN 1422-0067) from 2017 to 2018 (available at: http:// www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms/special issues/chemical induced mutagenesis) For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03897-129-0 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03897-130-6 (PDF) Articles in this volume are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book taken as a whole is c 2018 MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • A Risk for Cutaneous Melanoma
    Cancers 2015, 7, 1586-1604; doi:10.3390/cancers7030852 cancersOPEN ACCESS ISSN 2072-6694 www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers Article Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced Cytogenetic Damage in White, Hispanic and Black Skin Melanocytes: A Risk for Cutaneous Melanoma Amrita Dasgupta 1 and Meena Katdare 1,2,* 1 Hampton University Skin of Color Research Institute, Hampton, VA 23668, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-646-853-4107. Academic Editor: Chyi-Chia Richard Lee Received: 6 June 2015 / Accepted: 10 August 2015 / Published: 14 August 2015 Abstract: Cutaneous Melanoma (CM) is a leading cause of cancer deaths, with reports indicating a rising trend in the incidence rate of melanoma among Hispanics in certain U.S. states. The level of melanin pigmentation in the skin is suggested to render photoprotection from the DNA-damaging effects of Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR). UVR-induced DNA damage leads to cytogenetic defects visualized as the formation of micronuclei, multinuclei and polymorphic nuclei in cells, and a hallmark of cancer risk. The causative relationship between Sun exposure and CM is controversial, especially in Hispanics and needs further evaluation. This study was initiated with melanocytes from White, Hispanic and Black neonatal foreskins which were exposed to UVR to assess their susceptibility to UVR-induced modulation of cellular growth, cytogenetic damage, intracellular and released melanin. Our results show that White and Hispanic skin melanocytes with similar levels of constitutive melanin are susceptible to UVR-induced cytogenetic damage, whereas Black skin melanocytes are not.
    [Show full text]