Final Report Fulfilling the Ft. Atkinson, Iowa, Certified Local Government Grant Contract No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Report Fulfilling the Ft. Atkinson, Iowa, Certified Local Government Grant Contract No Archaeological site information has been removed from this copy of the report. The unedited text is available in the National Archaeological Data Base copy of the report. Final Report Fulfilling the Ft. Atkinson, Iowa, Certified Local Government Grant Contract No. 20-00.003 by Cynthia L. Peterson Project Archaeologist and Alan C. Becker Project Historian John F. Doershuk and Stephen C. Lensink Co-Principal Investigators Office of the State Archaeologist The University of Iowa Iowa City 2001 " Final Report Fulfilling the Ft. Atkinson, Iowa, Certified Local Government Grant Contract No. 20-00.003 by Cynthia L. Peterson Project Archaeologist and Alan C. Becker Project Historian John F. Doershuk and Stephen C. Lensink Co-Principal Investigators Office of the State Archaeologist The University of Iowa Iowa City 2001 ' Final Report Fulfilling the Ft. Atkinson, Iowa, Certified Local Government Grant Contract No. 20-00.003 Prepared for: Fort Atkinson Historic Preservation Commission and the State Historical Society of Iowa Community Programs Bureau Des Moines, Iowa Prepared by: Cynthia L. Peterson, Project Archaeologist, and Alan Becker, Historian This project has been partially supported through funding from a matching grant-in-aid agreement from the State Historical Society of Iowa, Community Programs Bureau, through the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Department of the Interior. This program received Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U. S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in Federally Assisted Programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U. S. Department of the Interior, National park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D. C, 20240. All phases of the project were conducted under the direction of Cynthia L. Peterson, Project Archaeologist and John F. Doershuk and Stephen C. Lensink Co-Principal Investigators Office of the State Archaeologist University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa with the assistance of the Fort Atkinson Historic Preservation Commission, Local Volunteers and Property Owners, and students of the summer 2000 University of Iowa field school "Archaeological Field Methods and American Indian Concerns" Septermber 1,2001 Table of Contents National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form Project Summary and Recommendations Acknowledgements Appendix I: National Archeological Data Base Form Appendix II: National Archives Microfilm Indexing Appendix III: Related Project Correspondence Appendix IV: Letters from David Olmsted to his Brother Samuel Appendix V: Memorandum of Agreement between the Ewings and Olmsted-Rhodes Appendix VI: Local Media Coverage Appendix VII: Geographic Information Systems Modeling NPS Form 10-9QQ-b OMB No. 1024- 0018 (Revised March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 1O-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic Archaeological Resources of the Neutral Ground, Northeast Iowa B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Administration of the Neutral Ground, Turkey River Subagency: 1840-1848 Administration of the Neutral Ground, Winnebago Village Life: 1840-1848 Administration of the Neutral Ground, Trading: 1840-1848 C. Form Prepared by name/title Cynthia L. Peterson/Project Archaeologist organization Office of the State Archaeologist, The University of Iowa date September 1, 2001 street & number 700 CLSB telephone 319-384-0732 city or town Iowa City state Iowa zip code 52242 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth In 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. ( See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature and title of certifying official Date State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ,;/w,yjv^;: v>; vv"= =;:•!;•?" i-".i\ •-•-: • • .-•.•••• - • •• • •- .: ••:•:-•"••'.'•••:,• ••-';•• *- • '- ••••' •• ••' .i:;..'. •>,.•• .-.-v. p: •*>,'<-*"•..' U5DI/NPS NRHP Multiple Property Documentation Form Historic Archaeoiogical Resources of the The Neutral Ground. Northeast Iowa Iowa Name of Multiple Property Listing State Table of Contents for Written Narrative Provide the following information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheets in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 1SB). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. Page Numbers E. Statement of Historic Contexts (If more than one historic context is documented, present them in sequential order.) Administration of the Neutral Ground, Turkey River Subagency: 1840-1848 1 Administration of the Neutral Ground, Winnebago Village Life: 1840-1848 8 Administration of the Neutral Ground, Trading: 1840-1848 21 F, Associated Property Types (Provide description, significance, and registration requirements.) Associated Property Types: The Administration of the Neutral Ground, Turkey River Subagency: 1840-1848 49 Associated Property Types: The Administration of the Neutral Ground, Winnebago Village Life: 1840-1848 51 Associated Property Types: The Administration of the Neutral Ground, Trading: 1840-1848 53 G. Geographical Data 55 H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods (Discuss the methods used in developing the multiple property listing.) Research Design 56 Methodology 57 Evaluation 58 Nominations 60 I. Major Bibliographical References 61 (List major written works and primary location of additional documentation: State Historic Preservation Office, other State agency, Federal agency, I oca! government, university, or other, specifying repository.) Primary location of additional data: X State Historic Preservation Office Other State agency Federal agency Local government University .. Other Name of repository: Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This Information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for fisting, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 etseq.). Estimated Burden Stetement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 120 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0016), Washington, DC 20503. MPS Fofm tO-900-a QMS Approval NO. 1024-OOtB (ism i United States Department of the Interior National Park Service i National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Historic Archaeological Resources of the Neutral Ground Section number E Page 1 Northeast Iowa P E. Statements of Historic Contexts The following historic contexts are based on contexts developed in several previous archaeological and archival P studies (Merry 1988; Peterson 1995, 1999; Rogers 1993) and in present research (Peterson and Becker 2001). Both Rogers (1993) and Peterson (1995) developed the historic context of "Administration of the Neutral Ground, Turkey River Subagency, 1840—1848," based upon archival and archaeological data. Peterson also utilized documentary and [ archaeological data to formulate the contexts "Administration of the Neutral Ground, Winnebago Village Life, 1840- 1848" (Peterson 1995) and "Administration of the Neutral Ground, Trading 1840-1848" (Peterson 1999). This latter context was more fully developed in Peterson and Becker (2001). Each of these contexts relates to the use of Northeast Iowa as a temporary home for the Winnebagos within the Neutral Ground. Stanley (1992, 1993) has previously
Recommended publications
  • Corn Moon Migrations: Ho-Chunk Belonging, Removal, and Return in the Early Nineteenth-Century Western Great Lakes
    Corn Moon Migrations: Ho-Chunk Belonging, Removal, and Return in the Early Nineteenth-Century Western Great Lakes By Libby Rose Tronnes A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON 2017 Date of final oral examination: 12/13/2017 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Susan L. Johnson, Professor, History William Cronon, Professor, History John Hall, Associate Professor, History Stephen Kantrowitz, Professor, History Larry Nesper, Professor, Anthropology and American Indian Studies ProQuest Number:10690192 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ProQuest 10690192 Published by ProQuest LLC ( 2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 © Copyright Libby Rose Tronnes 2017 All Rights Reserved i Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………….ii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………..vi List of Figures …………………………………………………………………………..………viii
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Atkinson Historic Preserve Technical
    FORT ATKINSON HISTORIC PRESERVE TECHNICAL REPORT HISTORIC ANALYSIS AND PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS FORT ATKINSON STATE MONUMENT PRESERVE TECHNICAL REPORT HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS prepared by Bradley B. Williams for Iowa State Preserves Advisory Board funded by Iowa Development Commission and Iowa Conservation Commission 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES, MAPS & ILLUSTRATIONS iii I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1 Location 1 Objectives & Goals 1 Value of Preserve 2 Surrounding Environment 5 Administrative History 6 Visitor Use 10 II. HISTORY OF THE FORT 14 The Winnebagoes 15 The Frontier Army 21 Federal Indian Policy 26 Winnebago Land Cessions 29 Founding Ft. Atkinson 34 Building the Fort 39 Daily Life at Ft. Atkinson 49 Abandoning the Fort 65 III. PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS 75 Ft. Atkinson Site at Present 75 Planning Concept A 77 Concept A: Recommendations 79 Planning Concept B 80 Concept B: Recommendations 83 Planning Concept C 87 Concept C: Recommendations 90 APPENDIX 94 BIBLIOGRAPHY 100 ii LIST OF TABLES, MAPS & ILLUSTRATIONS Following Page TABLE 1. Visitor Use of Fort Atkinson State Monument Preserve . 11 MAPS 1. N.E. Iowa Region 1 2. Local Features 5 3. Site 6 4. Original Land Plat 87 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Reed Mat Tipi 17 2. Winnebago Lodges 17 3. Winnebago Woman 19 4. Winnebago Man 19 5. Ft. Crawford 23 6. Ft. Winnebago. 23 7. Ft. Atkinson 45 8. West End of North Barracks 77 9. Southwest Blockhouse 77 10. North Barracks 81 11. North Barracks 81 12. Southwest Blockhouse 82 13. North Barracks 82 14. North Barracks, c. 1940 83 15. North Barracks, 1979 83 iii 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States' Indian Allies in the Black
    FRIENDS LIKE THESE: THE UNITED STATES’ INDIAN ALLIES IN THE BLACK HAWK WAR, 1832 by John William Hall A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2007 Advisor: R. Don Higginbotham Reader: Joseph T. Glatthaar Reader: Michael D. Green Reader: Richard H. Kohn Reader: Theda Perdue © 2007 John William Hall ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT JOHN W. HALL: Friends Like These: The United States’ Indian Allies in the Black Hawk War, 1832 (Under the direction of R. Don Higginbotham.) “Friends Like These” examines the decision by elements of the Menominee, Dakota, Potawatomi, and Ho Chunk tribes to ally with the United States government during the Black Hawk War of 1832. Because this conflict is usually depicted as a land- grab by ravenous settlers and the war occurred within two years of the passage of the Indian Removal Act, the military participation of these tribes seems incongruous. This work seeks to determine why various bands of these tribes cooperated with the U.S. Army when such alliance seemed inimical to the interests of their respective tribes. Moreover, it explores the extent to which the Americans conceived of themselves as allies to the Indians while assessing the consequences of this alliance for each of the tribes involved. This study finds that the Indians participated in the Black Hawk War to fulfill their own wartime objectives, and that in so doing they sought to apply familiar forms to the new situation that unfolded in the years after the War of 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Document 2011
    THE FALLS HISTORY PROJECT 2011 BRF IN 1875: SPAULDING AND THE REMOVAL EPISODE JACOB SPAULDING 1810-1876 WAUKON DECORAH c. 1780-1868 YELLOWTHUNDER c. 1774-1874 OLD WINNESHIEK c. 1827 -1887 1 | P a g e PREFACE TO THE 2011 PROJECT Perhaps no topic proves as complex for history students as the story of race relations. The 10 th edition of the Falls History Project finds us once again foraging around in the latter years of the 19 th century and, more specifically, exploring an episode that helps us better appreciate a tragic moment in Ho-chunk history, and the surprising involvement of Jacob Spaulding and other Euro-Americans in that story. First some background. When easterners first ventured into the Black River Valley in 1819, they encountered the Ho-chunk people, a tribe that at one time laid claim to the northern third of Illinois and southern third of Wisconsin. Like other regional tribes, the Ho-chunk were forced to deal with a succession of powerful European political entities, first the French, then the British, and ultimately the upstart Americans who broke from British rule. They first signed a treaty of “peace and friendship” with the US government in 1816. As was often the case, negotiation with the government led to both inter and intra-tribal factionalizing – a confusing scenario that, in the case of the Ho-chunk, forever changed their history. Encroachment by Euro-American settlers on Ho-chunk land began in earnest in the 1820s with the advent of lead-mining south of Prairie du Chien. Land cession treaties signed in 1829 and 1832 led to removal efforts aimed at inducing the Ho-chunk to relocate in an area west of the Mississippi in Iowa (the so-called “Neutral Ground”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Removal of the Winnebago Indians from Wisconsin in 1873-4 by Lawrence W
    NAME INDEX THE REMOVAL OF THE WINNEBAGO INDIANS FROM WISCONSIN IN 1873-4 BY LAWRENCE W. ONSAGER No attempt has been made to update Winnebago with Ho-Chunk. Ah-ha-cho-gah (see also Ah-ha-cho-ker/Blue Wing) (?-1893), 222, 223, 254 Ahuzipga see Winneshiek, Old, 145 Anderson, Moses, 148 Merchant, La Crosse, WI; signed document certifying good character of Winnebago, 1873. Arnold, Alexander A. (1833-1915), 92, 95-100, 104-5, 107, 113 Captain, Company C, 30th Wis. Inf; native of Trempealeau County, Wis (errata, 30th Regt, not 13th). Arthur, Evan, 243 Merchant, Portage, testified to the good character of the Winnebago/Ho chunk, 1874. Atkinson, Henry (1782-1842), 35, 38-9, 41, 53-61 General Atkinson led troops from St. Louis, 1827. Atwater, Caleb (1778-1867), 9, 10, 12-13, 22 Commissioner at the 1829 Winnebago treaty; politician, historian, and early archaeologist from Ohio; wrote “Remarks Made on a Tour to Prairie du Chien . 1829.” Austin, Mrs. Isaac (Emily A. Thrall, c1839-?), 108 Resident on Germantown Road, Juneau Co, WI, 1863. Bacon, J. M., 209 Wrote letter to U. S. Adjutant General Baker, William T., 219, 242-4 Resident of Oakdale Township, Monroe Co, Wis; a removal agent; swore under oath that the Winnebago were not ill-treated, 1874 (errata, William T., not William Y). Banfield, E. C., 128 Office of Indian Affairs, 1874. Barber, J(oel) Allen (1809-1881), 137-140, 149, 170, 257-8 U. S. congressman from Lancaster, Wis., 1873-74. Barron, Henry Danforth (1833-1882), 248-50 Wis. State Senator from St.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian History of Winneshiek County Charles Philip Hexom
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Iowa Book Gallery 1913 Indian History of Winneshiek County Charles Philip Hexom Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/iowabooks Let us know how access to this document benefits oy u Recommended Citation Hexom, Charles Philip, "Indian History of Winneshiek County" (1913). Iowa Book Gallery. 25. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/iowabooks/25 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Iowa Book Gallery by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDIAN HISTORY OF WINNESHIEK COUNTY BY CHARLES PHILIP HEXOM INDIAN HISTORY I OF WINNESHIEI( COUNTY I Compiled by CHARLES PHILIP HEXOM A. K. BAILEY & SON. INCORPORATED DECOR •\H. fOWA 1913 7 Copyright, 1913 CHARLES PHILIP HEXOM PREFACE In the preparation of this article it has been the compiler's aim to make the work as complete and correct as possible. Dili­ gent search has been made for information, and considerable pains have been taken to give the people of Winneshiek county a reliable account of the Indians who once inhabited this section of the country. The writer has discovered that a number of erroneous statements in regard to these Indians have unfortu­ nately found their way into print. In such instances every effort has been made to procure accurate information. In gathering the data here assembled the writer has had the kind assistance of the ·Wisconsin Historical Society, the Iowa Library Commission, and the United States Ethnological Bu­ reau. Thanks are also due to Oliver Lamere (a first cousin of Angel De Cora), who has made diligent search for desired in­ formation among members of his tribe on their reservation in Nebraska; Geo.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian History of Winneshiek C
    I6H5 THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES INDIAN HISTORY WINNESHIEK (XHJNTY BY CHARLES PHILIP HEXOM INDIAN HISTORY OF WINNESHIEK COUNTY Compiled by CHARLES PHILIP HEXOM A. K. BAILEY & SON, INCORPORATED DUCORAIl. tOW.\ 1913 Copyright, 1913 CHARLES PHILIP HEXOM PREFACE In the preparation of this article it has been the compiler's aim to make the work as complete and correct as possible. Dili- gent search has been made for information, and considerable pains have been taken to give the people of Winneshiek county a reliable account of the Indians who once inhabited this section of the country. The writer has discovered that a number of erroneous statements in regard to these Indians have unfortu- nately found their way into print. In such instances every effort has been made to procure accurate information. In gathering the data here assembled the writer has had the kind assistance of the Wisconsin Historical Society, the Iowa Library Commission, and the United States Ethnological Bu- reau. Thanks are also due to Oliver Lamere (a first cousin of Angel De Cora), who has made diligent search for desired in- formation among members of his tribe on their reservation in Nebraska; Geo. W. Kingsley, Angel De Cora, Little Winne- shiek, and Antoine Grignon (all of whom are Winnebago In- the is and dians, except last, who part Winnebago part Sioux) ; Dr. D. Pierce C. Mackenstadt Eben ; Roger ; Chas. H. Saun- ders, and H. J. Goddard. All of the above have responded in a most gratifying man- ner to requests for information, some of them taking the trouble to prepare long communications, which have been indispensable in the preparation of the following article and which the writer cherishes as among his most valued possessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Atkinson Historic Preserve Technical
    FORT ATKINSON HISTORIC PRESERVE TECHNICAL REPORT HISTORIC ANALYSIS AND PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS FORT ATKINSON STATE MONUMENT PRESERVE TECHNICAL REPORT HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS prepared by Bradley B. Williams for Iowa State Preserves Advisory Board funded by Iowa Development Commission and Iowa Conservation Commission 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES, MAPS & ILLUSTRATIONS iii I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1 Location 1 Objectives & Goals 1 Value of Preserve 2 Surrounding Environment 5 Administrative History 6 Visitor Use 10 II. HISTORY OF THE FORT 14 The Winnebagoes 15 The Frontier Army 21 Federal Indian Policy 26 Winnebago Land Cessions 29 Founding Ft. Atkinson 34 Building the Fort 39 Daily Life at Ft. Atkinson 49 Abandoning the Fort 65 III. PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS 75 Ft. Atkinson Site at Present 75 Planning Concept A 77 Concept A: Recommendations 79 Planning Concept B 80 Concept B: Recommendations 83 Planning Concept C 87 Concept C: Recommendations 90 APPENDIX 94 BIBLIOGRAPHY 100 ii LIST OF TABLES, MAPS & ILLUSTRATIONS Following Page TABLE 1. Visitor Use of Fort Atkinson State Monument Preserve . 11 MAPS 1. N.E. Iowa Region 1 2. Local Features 5 3. Site 6 4. Original Land Plat 87 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Reed Mat Tipi 17 2. Winnebago Lodges 17 3. Winnebago Woman 19 4. Winnebago Man 19 5. Ft. Crawford 23 6. Ft. Winnebago. 23 7. Ft. Atkinson 45 8. West End of North Barracks 77 9. Southwest Blockhouse 77 10. North Barracks 81 11. North Barracks 81 12. Southwest Blockhouse 82 13. North Barracks 82 14. North Barracks, c. 1940 83 15. North Barracks, 1979 83 iii 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ho-Chunk Experience in the 19Th Century
    Lead, Land, and Cranberries: The Ho-Chunk Experience in the 19th Century By Adam King Abstract: This paper will examine how and why the Ho-Chunk people of Wisconsin lost their estate in Wisconsin. The paper will focus on the desire for natural resources that drove white settlers to push for the removal of the Ho-Chunk people from Wisconsin. The paper will build on the work of other historians to tell a more complete story of the Ho-Chunk experience. Specifically the paper will closely examine a long overlooked part of Ho-Chunk history, the removal of 1873. By telling this story in more detail I hope to complete the history of the Ho-Chunk in the 19th century. ii Table of Contents: Abstract…………………………….. ii Table of contents……………………iii Introduction…………………………1 Background………………………….3 Lead…………………………………6 Removal Policy…………………….11 Land………………………………..13 Cranberries…………………………24 Conclusion…………………………38 Bibliography……………………….41 iii Introduction: The survival of the Ho-Chunk nation in Wisconsin is a remarkable story. Disposed of all their land in the state in 1837 and ordered to remove west of the Mississippi River, somehow small bands of Ho-Chunk were able to evade capture and removal in the 1840s and eventually began to establish themselves as a viable part of the white community in central Wisconsin. Despite their efforts to create a safe and reasonable relationship with the white community, the Ho-Chunk were again ordered to remove in 1873, almost thirty years after the last removal order. Removed to a reservation in Nebraska the Ho-Chunk, showing much courage, defied the wishes of the government and returned on their own to Wisconsin, reestablishing their presence in Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]