DOCSLIB.ORG

A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2 A14 12 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Development Consent Order Application +($(; TR010018 E/A14/EX/122 Statement of Common Ground Update Report - Deadline 8 September 2015 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement Scheme Statements of Common Ground Report Update – Deadline 8 Date: 2 September 2015 Reference: HE/A14/EX/122 Version: Examination Deadline 8 Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Individual Statements of Common Ground (SoCGs) Stakeholder Ref Land Interests A H Ekins, M G Storey, M N Handley & A D C Smith (Trustees) (with regard to The Mill Common Car Park & Centenary House) LI01 Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge (Draft) LI02 Church Commissioners for England (Corpus Christi Farm, Brampton Lodge Farm, Lower Debden Farm and Debden Farm) (Draft) LI03 Mr P Cooper (Oxholme Farm) (Draft) LI04 Domino Printing Sciences plc (Draft) LI05 Mr Everdell LI06 J.J. Gallagher Ltd and Land Improvement Holdings plc, BPHA Ltd and Premier Inn Hotels (Draft) LI07 Goff Petroleum LI08 The George Lenton Trust et al (Draft) LI10 Mr R Lenton (Draft) LI11 Mr P Mann (Lodge Farm, Buckden) (Draft) LI12 The Marshall Family (Woodhatch Farm) LI13 Mr R Pearson of Grange Farm (Draft) LI15 The Sewell Family (Harcourt, Nursery Farm and Meadow View Farm) (Draft) LI17 St John's College (farmland at Grange Farm, Girton and Poplar Farm, Dry Drayton) (Draft) LI18 G W Topham and Sons and Miss Papworth (Draft) LI19 Mr A Wilderspin (Draft) LI20 Mrs F Winter, Mrs V Farbon and Mrs M Sadler et al (Draft) LI21 Coif Nominees (Draft) LI22 Napp Pharmaceuticals LI23 Non-Statutory Organisations Hilton Action on Traffic (HAT) NS05 Royal Observer Corps Association NS08 Cambridgeshire Chambers of Commerce NS11 Huntingdon Life Sciences NS12 Statutory Environmental Body Natural England SEB02 Statutory Undertakers Gas Transport Company SU07 Virgin Media SU15 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon SoCG Report Update – Deadline 8 improvement scheme 1 Introduction 1.1.1 This report has been submitted at Examination Deadline 8 (2 September 2015) in response to the Examining Authority (ExA)’s request in the Rule 9 letter dated 4 August 2015 for the submission of final Statements of Common Ground (SoCGs). 1.1.2 These SoCGs are submitted to the ExA in relation to the application by Highways England for development consent under the Planning Act 2008 for the proposed A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme. The Application was submitted to the Planning Inspectorate on 31 December 2014 and accepted for examination on 27 January 2015. 1.1.3 This report presents the SoCGs which are listed in the table of contents. The following SoCGs are finalised and signed by both stakeholder and Highways England: • Gas Transport Company • Virgin Media • A H Ekins, M G Storey, M N Handley & A D C Smith (Trustees) (with regard to The Mill Common Car Park & Centenary House) • Mr Everdell • Goff Petroleum • The Marshall Family (Woodhatch Farm) • Napp Pharmaceuticals • Royal Observer Corps Association • Cambridgeshire Chambers of Commerce • Huntingdon Life Sciences • Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour at Madingley • Natural England HE/A14/EX/122 1/1 September 2015 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon SoCG Report Update – Deadline 8 improvement scheme 1.1.4 This report also includes draft landowner SoCGs which remain in discussion. These have been included to support the Compulsory Acquisition Hearings on 2 and 3 September 2015. 1.1.5 The SoCGs not included within this report remain in discussion in order to finalise the outstanding issues as noted in the SoCG Update Report - Deadline 7 (HE/A14/EX/98, Examination Reference REP7-033). This is to ensure the current and ongoing discussions with stakeholders can be appropriately conducted and issues resolved prior to final submission of these SoCGs. 1.1.6 As previously provided in the SoCG report at Deadlines 3 and 7, SoCGs include: • a list of formal engagement between Highways England and the stakeholder; • a list of matters that have been agreed and not agreed, including positions on those matters by both parties; and • a list of matters that remain under discussion and how the parties are working to resolve the issues. Highways England notes that some of these may only be completed during the detailed design stage of the Scheme, dependent on approval of the DCO by the Secretary of State. 1.1.7 A small number of SoCGs are slightly different in format based on stakeholder preference and / or the format of discussions. HE/A14/EX/122 1/2 September 2015 5 Agreement on this SoCG This Statement of Common Ground has been jointly prepared and agreed by: Name: Sarah Collins Signature: Position: Property Project Manager On behalf of: Highways England Date: 01.09.15 Name: Andrew Smith Signature: Position: As Trustee On behalf of: The Trustees Date: 24th June 2015 HE/A14/EX/?? LI01/1 August 2015 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Statement of Common Ground between Highways England and The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of The University of Cambridge Date: 2 September 2015 Reference: HE/A14/EX/122/LI02 Version: Examination deadline 8 Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close , Guildford GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of document 1 1.2 This Statement of Common Ground 1 1.3 Structure of the Statement of Common Ground 1 2 Previous engagement undertaken 4 3 Matters agreed and matters not agreed 6 3.1 Matters agreed 6 3.2 Matters not agreed 6 4 Record of areas still under discussion 7 5 Agreement on this SoCG 10 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon SoCG Report Update – Deadline 8 Improvement scheme 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of document 1.1.1 A Statement of Common Ground (SoCG) is a written statement prepared jointly by the applicant for a Development Consent Order (DCO) and another party. It sets out matters of agreement between both parties, as well as matters where there is not an agreement and matters which are under discussion. 1.1.2 The aim of SoCGs is to provide a clear record of the issues discussed and the stage each issue is at during the discussion. The SoCG can be used as evidence of these discussions in representations to the Planning Inspectorate as part of their examination of the DCO application. 1.2 This Statement of Common Ground 1.2.1 This SoCG has been jointly prepared by Highways England, as the Applicant, and the Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of The University of Cambridge (“The University”), as freehold owners, and tenants of part, of the Cambridge University Farms at Yarmouth Farm, Catchall Farm and Ladysmith Farm. It refers to the application for the proposed A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme which was submitted to the Planning Inspectorate on 31 December 2014. 1.2.2 The proposed scheme extends for a distance of 21 miles, from the existing A14 at Ellington to the Cambridge Northern Bypass at Milton. It includes a new bypass to the south of Huntingdon, carriageway widening on the existing A14 between Swavesey and Girton, and improvements to the Cambridge Northern Bypass. It also includes junction improvements, the widening of a 4.5 mile section of the A1 trunk road between Brampton and Alconbury, and approximately 7 miles of new local access roads. In addition, it includes the de-trunking (i.e. returning to local road status) of the existing A14 trunk road between the Ellington and Swavesey junctions, and the removal of the existing road viaduct over the East Coast Mainline railway at Huntingdon. 1.3 Structure of the Statement of Common Ground 1.3.1 This SoCG comprises 5 sections: • Section 1 – this introduction. • Section 2 – a record of engagement undertaken, for example meetings, emails and letters related to the discussions, including a summary of each. • Section 3 – tables recording areas which are agreed and not agreed as a result of the discussions. • Section 4 – a table recording areas which are under discussion, and a summary of the issues related to each. • Section 5 – signatures of the parties to indicate a true and accurate record of the discussions. HE/A14/EX/122 LI02/1 September 2015 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon SoCG Report Update – Deadline 8 Improvement scheme 1.4 Identification of the land to which this SoCG relates Plot number (from Land Plan showing Cross-reference to relevant BoR) for land in DCO plot number (from sheet of General boundary BoR) Arrangement (GA) drawings 19/12a Sheet 19 Sheet 19 19/12b Sheet 19 Sheet 19 20/5 Sheet 20 GA Sheet 16 20/22a, b. Sheet 20 GA Sheet 16 23/ 15a,b,c,d Sheet 23 GA Sheet 20 24/ Sheet 24 GA Sheet 20 3a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j,k,l,m,n 24/10a,b,c,d,e,f Sheet 24 GA Sheet 20 (tenanted as Cambridge University Farms) 25/ 2a,b (tenanted as Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 Cambridge University Farms) 25/ 3 (tenanted as Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 Cambridge University Farms) 25/ 5 Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 25/ 7a,b (tenanted as Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 Cambridge University Farms) 25/ 8 (tenanted as Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 Cambridge University Farms) 25/ 9 (tenanted as Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 Cambridge University Farms) 25/ 11 (tenanted as Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 Cambridge University Farms) 25/ 12 (tenanted as Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 Cambridge University Farms) 25/ 15 Sheet 25 GA Sheet 21 HE/A14/EX/122
Recommended publications
  • Regional Environment Strategy

    Regional Environment Strategy

    OUR ENVIRONMENT, OUR FUTURE THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY FOR THE EAST OF ENGLAND Produced by a joint working group representing The East of England Regional Assembly and The East of England Environment Forum JULY 2003 ‘OUR ENVIRONMENT, OUR FUTURE’ THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY FOR THE EAST OF ENGLAND PRODUCED BY A JOINT WORKING GROUP REPRESENTING THE EAST OF ENGLAND REGIONAL ASSEMBLY AND THE EAST OF ENGLAND ENVIRONMENT FORUM JULY 2003 FOREWORD This first Environment Strategy for the East of England region catalogues and celebrates the many diverse environmental assets which will have a crucial bearing on the continued economic and social development of the Region. This Strategy will complement the other regional strategies within the Regional Assembly’s family of ‘Integrated Regional Strategies’. It deliberately makes key linkages between the environmental assets of the region, and economic development and social inclusion. The delivery of the Strategy will be the responsibility of Government, local authorities and other public and private sector bodies, and the voluntary sector. Crucially, everyone who lives and works in the East of England and values the region as a diverse natural and built Further Information landscape, is an important stakeholder. The very act of producing the Strategy has raised many issues, challenges and missing If you have questions about the Regional Environment Strategy, or would like to find out linkages. We hope above all that the Strategy will assist our regional partners in focussing more about how the region is moving towards a more sustainable future, please contact: environmental consciousness at the forefront of other strands of public policy making.
  • Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects by Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun

    Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects by Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun

    Value for Money Integration in the Renegotiation of Public Private Partnership Road Projects By Ajibola Oladipo Fatokun A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire October 2018 i STUDENT DECLARATION I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work Signature of Candidate: ____________________________________________________ Type of Award: ________________________ PhD _______________________ School: ______________________ Engineering ____________________ ii ABSTRACT The governments of various countries have continued to adopt Public Private Partnership (PPP) for infrastructure projects delivery due to its many advantages over the traditional procurement method. However, concerns have been raised by stakeholders about the viability of PPP to deliver Value for Money (VfM), especially for the client. These discussions have generated debates and arguments in policy and advisory documents within the last decade mainly in the renegotiation of PPP water and transport projects and their VfM implications. Poor or non-achievement of VfM in PPP contracts renegotiation has led to this study in PPP road projects with the overall aim of integrating VfM considerations into the renegotiation process of PPP road projects. Mixed methodology research approach is used to achieve the objectives set for the study. Interviews and questionnaires of professionals involved in Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO) road projects in the UK are used in the study.
  • Suffolk County Council

    Suffolk County Council

    Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 GVA Grimley Ltd 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR 0870 900 8990 www.gvagrimley.co.uk This report is designed to be printed double sided. Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 Reference: P:\PLANNING\621\Instruction\Clients\Suffolk County Council\Western Suffolk ELR\10.0 Reports\Final Report\Final\WesternSuffolkELRFinalReport090506.doc Contact: Michael Dall Tel: 020 7911 2127 Email: [email protected] www.gvagrimley.co.uk Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 2. POLICY CONTEXT....................................................................................................... 5 3. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET ANALYSIS.................................................... 24 4. EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY ANALYSIS.............................................................. 78 5. EMPLOYMENT FLOORSPACE PROJECTIONS..................................................... 107 6. BALANCING DEMAND AND SUPPLY .................................................................... 147 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................... 151 Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The Western Suffolk Study Area 5 Figure 2 Claydon Business Park, Claydon 26 Figure 3 Industrial Use in
  • 29 July 1931

    29 July 1931

    [2') Jc'sy, 1931.] '10313 ]Eon. J. NICHOLSON: Very well, Sir. I-on. H. SEDDON: The definition of I move an amendment- "Chattel" haviin been amended, it becomes necessary to strike out certain other words. That after the woard ''contrary'' the fol- lowing be strutck out:-''and AhalI extend( to I move all amendment- any hire -puirvbasr agree tut miad e an.d in 'That the following be st ruck ohut: - opera tiont at or before the vommnemcent'ut uf M.Notor veelde' and 'vehicle ' have tli, this Act.'' same nmeanlings respectively as in the Tra'iv Acet, 1919-1i93O.' The M1INI STER FORt COUNTRY WATER SUPPLIES: Though I did not Amnicdmen t put a 31( passed; the clause, take part in the debat!' on this matter yes- ;es almended, agreed to. tcrda v, I ca nnot sit silent under the state- I1iil again reportel with further amend- nients made by '.%r. Nicholson. We have ilcuts. beffore us the evidence given to the select committee by reputable firms. They are not l)iLe aIdjI)uI Jld (it t,.4 p.m. worrying in the slightest degree about the restrospective phase of the Bill. Mr. Nichol- son has said we should he fair and impartial. The clause is fair and impartial. 'What is there wrong with allowing the hirer to go to court when he canl prove that the interest charged is excessive? Is he not entitled to pro)tection, no matter how long the agreement has been made? Surely Mr. Nicholson does not wish to protect firms who do business on unfit'r and utir-nisonable lines.

  • Welcome to This A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Public Exhibition. This Exhibition Is About the Work We Are Doing

    A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme A1 Welcome Alconbury D3 Woolley A141 S2 Huntingdon St Ives A14 Town centre improvements including removal of A14 viaduct Ellington D3 The Hemingfords Brampton D2 Existing A14 Godmanchester Fenstanton Fen Drayton Proposed A14 Swavesey Buckden D3 D3 D2 The Offords A1 Northstowe Hilton Conington New development S2 A1198 D3 Boxworth Lolworth Histon Bar Hill D4 Milton Girton A14 D3 M11 Routes for construction traffic East Coast Mainline railway Cambridge River Great Ouse A428 Huntingdon Southern Bypass S2 Single 2 lane carriageway A1 widening D2 Dual 2 lane carriageway A14 on-line improvements D3 Dual 3 lane carriageway Cambridge Northern Bypass D4 Dual 4 lane carriageway Local access roads © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 Ordnance Survey 100030649 Highways England, creative S160069 Welcome to this A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme public exhibition. This exhibition is about the work we are doing in Huntingdon as part of the A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme. Members of the project team are here to answer any questions you might have. Thank you Highways England – Creative BED19_0157 A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Why is the scheme necessary? The A14 provides an east- west route linking the Midlands with East Anglia. It begins at Catthorpe near Rugby, where it connects with the M1 and M6 motorway, and continues east for approximately 130 miles to the port town of Felixstowe. It forms one of the UK’s strategic routes and is part of the Trans-European Transport Network. The A14 between Cambridge and Huntingdon serves an additional purpose, connecting the A1(M) motorway to the North The scheme will: of England with the M11 motorway � combat congestion, making the to London and the South East.
  • Henges in Yorkshire

    Henges in Yorkshire

    Looking south across the Thornborough Henges. SE2879/116 NMR17991/01 20/5/04. ©English Heritage. NMR Prehistoric Monuments in the A1 Corridor Information and activities for teachers, group leaders and young archaeologists about the henges, cursus, barrows and other monuments in this area Between Ferrybridge and Catterick the modern A1 carries more than 50,000 vehicles a day through West and North Yorkshire. It passes close to a number of significant but often overlooked monuments that are up to 6,000 years old. The earliest of these are the long, narrow enclosures known as cursus. These were followed by massive ditched and banked enclosures called henges and then smaller monuments, including round barrows. The A1 also passes by Iron Age settlements and Roman towns, forts and villas. This map shows the route of the A1 in Yorkshire and North of Boroughbridge the A1 the major prehistoric monuments that lie close by. follows Dere Street Roman road. Please be aware that the monuments featured in this booklet may lie on privately-owned land. 1 The Landscape Setting of the A1 Road Neolithic and Bronze Age Monuments Between Boroughbridge and Cursus monuments are very long larger fields A1 Road quarries Catterick the A1 heads north with rectangular enclosures, typically more the Pennines to the west and than 1km long. They are thought to the low lying vales of York and date from the middle to late Neolithic Mowbray to the east. This area period and were probably used for has a rural feel with a few larger ceremonies and rituals. settlements (like the cathedral city of Ripon and the market town of The western end of the Thornborough pockets of woodland cursus is rounded but some are square.
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Determination Statement

    Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Determination Statement

    Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Screening Determination Statement October 2018 Executive Summary This statement sets out the reasons for the determination that the draft Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan is unlikely to result in significant environmental effects and therefore does not require a Strategic Environmental Assessment. In addition this statement determines that the making of the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan is not likely to have a significant effect on a European site. This determination statement is intended to demonstrate that the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan is compatible with certain European Union obligations as required by the basic conditions, namely: • Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment; and • Article 6(3) and (4) of the EU Habitats Directive and with Regulation 61 of the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (as amended). Histon & Impington Parish Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council will publish this determination statement in accordance with the regulatory requirements. Determination Statement This statement has been produced to ensure the Neighbourhood Plan will, when examined, comply with the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) in particular Regulation 32 and Regulation 15(1)e(ii) of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) (Amendment) Regulations 2015. A neighbourhood plan is required to meet a number of basic conditions (which are set out in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990), one of which being it must not breach and must be otherwise compatible with EU and Human Rights obligations.
  • Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses

    Durham E-Theses Ecological Changes in the British Flora WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN How to cite: WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN (2009) Ecological Changes in the British Flora, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/121/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Ecological Changes in the British Flora Kevin John Walker B.Sc., M.Sc. School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences University of Durham 2009 This thesis is submitted in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dedicated to Terry C. E. Wells (1935-2008) With thanks for the help and encouragement so generously given over the last ten years Plate 1 Pulsatilla vulgaris , Barnack Hills and Holes, Northamptonshire Photo: K.J. Walker Contents ii Contents List of tables vi List of figures viii List of plates x Declaration xi Abstract xii 1.
  • East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary

    East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary

    East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document June 2010 © THE WILDLIFE TRUST FOR BEDFORDSHIRE, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE & PETERBOROUGH LTD and EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL All rights reserved. No part of the text of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any type of retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owners All mapping is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Cambridgeshire County Council 100023205 (2005). EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNTY WILDLIFE STIES REGISTER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODOLOGY 2 2.1 Field Survey 2 2.2 Assessment of Sites 3 2.3 Output Format 3 3 RESULTS 4 3.1 Statistics 4 COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES REGISTER ANNEXE Criteria for the Selection of County Wildlife Sites Version 5 (2009). CONTENTS PAGE EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES SPD 1 Introduction 1.1 The East Cambridgeshire District Council (ECDC) County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document has been produced to update the East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Register 2005 so that it can be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the East Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework (LDF). 1.2 On the 20th October 2009 East Cambridgeshire District Council adopted its Core Strategy Development Plan Document as part of its LDF. The adoption of the Core Strategy means that most of the policies in the East Cambridgeshire District Local Plan 2000 have been superceded.
  • Round Britain Walk Postcards

    Round Britain Walk Postcards

    20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 1 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 2 Welcome to the Norfolk Broads The Broads have been a favourite boating holiday destination since the early 20th century. The waterways are lock-free, although there are three Congratulations, bridges under which only small cruisers can pass. The area attracts you have reached all kinds of visitors, including ramblers, The Norfolk Broads. artists, anglers, and bird-watchers as well as people "messing about in boats". The Norfolk wherry, the traditional cargo craft of the area, can still be seen on the Broads as some specimens have been preserved and restored. 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 3 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 4 Welcome toT he Angel of theNorth As the name suggests, it is a steel sculpture of an angel, standing 20 metres (66 feet) tall, with wings 54 metres (178 feet) wide – making it wider than the Congratulations, Statue of Liberty's height. The wings you have reached themselves are not planar, but are angled The Angel of the 3.5 degrees forward, which Gormley has been quoted as saying was to create North, Tyne and Wear. ”a sense of embrace”. It stands on a hill overlooking the A1 road and the A167 road into Tyneside and the East Coast Main Line rail route. 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 5 20944_RBW Postcards:20944_RBW Postcards 6/10/09 19:35 Page 6 Welcome to Eilean Donan Castle Eilean Donan (Scottish Gaelic for Island of Donan), is a small island in Loch Duich in the western Highlands of Scotland.
  • Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy

    Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy

    Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 of 176 June 2011 Contributors The Strategy has been shaped and informed by many partners including: The Green Infrastructure Forum Anglian Water Cambridge City Council Cambridge Past, Present and Future (formerly Cambridge Preservation Society) Cambridge Sports Lake Trust Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Partnership Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Environmental Record Centre Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council East of England Development Agency (EEDA) English Heritage The Environment Agency Fenland District Council Forestry Commission Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group GO-East Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England NHS Cambridgeshire Peterborough Environment City Trust Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) South Cambridgeshire District Council The National Trust The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire & Peterborough The Woodland Trust Project Group To manage the review and report to the Green Infrastructure Forum. Cambridge City Council Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council Environment Agency Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England South Cambridgeshire District Council The Wildlife Trust Consultants: LDA Design Page 2 of 176 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................11 2 Background
  • Evolution of Ubiquitous Computing with Sensor Networks in Urban Environments

    Evolution of Ubiquitous Computing with Sensor Networks in Urban Environments

    Evolution of Ubiquitous Computing with Sensor Networks in Urban Environments Eiko Yoneki University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory Cambridge CB3 0FD, United Kingdom [email protected] ABSTRACT of smart WSNs with a bigger network such as the Internet A significant increase in real world event monitoring capability increases the coverage area and application domain of the with wireless sensor networks will lead to a further evolution of ad hoc network. Based on such a technological vision, new ubiquitous computing. This paper describes this evolution, lead- types of applications will rely on ad hoc connections between ing to humans being connected to the real world via comput- nearby nodes to establish multi-hop dynamic routes in order ers without awareness. We address an ad hoc communication to propagate data and messages between out-of-range nodes. paradigm, a data-centric approach, and a middleware’s task, to Sensors could be attached to any object, which may move understand the ultimate goal of this new world. We also briefly around, or be placed stationally. Furthermore sensors could explain our upcoming new traffic monitoring project in the city be attached to the human body creating Personal Area Net- of Cambridge. work (PAN). The communication among objects, humans, and computers happens at home, at an office, on a street, at EMERGENCE OF WIRELESS SENSOR NET- the train station, in a car, in a restaurant, or in other places at any time. Fig.1 shows application spaces for ubiquitous WORKS computing with WSNs. Ubiquitous Computing opens com- The evolution of cyber space started from mainframe com- munications over tiny sensor networks through Internet scale puters and moved to PCs.