DOCSLIB.ORG

Red Deer Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Red Deer Technical Report APPENDIX A AESO System Planning Study Red Deer Technical Report Report Index Section Introduction Number Number of Pages 1 Introduction 9 2 Planning Criteria and Study Assumptions 14 3 Existing System Assessment 5 4 Development of System Reinforcement Options 18 5 Transmission Alternatives- Near Term Assessment 5 6 Transmission Alternatives- Long Term Assessment 4 7 Alternatives Comparison 4 8 Sensitivity Analysis 2 9 Recommended Proposal 7 Attachment A Existing System Analysis 120 Attachment B Historical Substation Load Details 2 Attachment C Alternative Details 8 Attachment D Steady State and Voltage Stability Analysis 1752 Attachment E Transient Stability Analysis 2732 Attachment F Sensitivity Analysis 20 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Region of Existing System ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Objectives and Scope .............................................................................................. 8 2.0 Planning Criteria and Study Assumptions ........................................... 10 2.1 Reliability Criteria .............................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Voltage Stability Methodology .......................................................................................... 12 2.3 Monitored Areas ............................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Load Scenarios ................................................................................................................. 14 2.5 Load Forecast ................................................................................................................... 15 2.6 Generation Assumptions .................................................................................................. 16 2.7 Facility Ratings ................................................................................................................. 17 2.8 Transmission Assumptions ............................................................................................... 19 2.8.1 Bulk System Assumptions ....................................................................................... 19 2.8.2 Hanna Region System Assumptions ....................................................................... 20 2.8.3 Central East Region System Assumptions .............................................................. 21 2.8.4 Southern Alberta Transmission Reinforcements (SATR) ........................................ 22 2.9 System Inter Dependencies ............................................................................................. 23 3.0 Existing System Assessment ............................................................... 24 3.1 Power Flow Analysis ........................................................................................................ 24 3.1.1 Load Supply Adequacy ............................................................................................ 24 3.1.2 High SOK Cut Plane Flows ...................................................................................... 25 3.2 Voltage Stability Analysis ................................................................................................. 25 3.3 Transfer Capability Analysis ............................................................................................. 26 3.4 Short Circuit Analysis ....................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Existing System Need Assessment Summary ................................................................. 27 4.0 Development of System Reinforcement Options ................................ 29 4.1 Transmission Technology Options Screening .................................................................. 29 4.1.1 New Transmission Lines .......................................................................................... 29 4.1.2 Transmission Line Upgrades and Rebuild ............................................................... 30 4.1.3 Voltage Up-Rating .................................................................................................... 31 4.1.4 Build New Transmission Substations and Upgrade Existing Stations ..................... 31 4.1.5 Provide Reactive Power Support Equipment .......................................................... 31 4.1.6 Consideration of Operational Measures .................................................................. 32 4.2 Formulation and Screening of Red Deer Alternatives ...................................................... 32 4.2.1 Common Set of Transmission System Development .............................................. 33 4.2.2 Alternative 1 Development (80L Alternative) ........................................................... 37 4.2.3 Development of Alternative 2 (Hybrid Alternative) ................................................... 41 4.2.4 Development of Alternative 3 (Double Loop Alternative) ......................................... 45 4.2.5 Summary of Screening of Alternatives .................................................................... 45 5.0 Transmission Alternatives- Near Term Assessment (2012) ............... 47 5.1 Power Flow Analysis (2012) ............................................................................................. 47 5.1.1 System Performance under Category C and D Contingency Events ...................... 48 5.2 Transient Stability Studies (2012) .................................................................................... 48 5.3 Voltage Stability (P-V and Q-V) Analysis ......................................................................... 49 5.4 Transfer Capability Analysis ............................................................................................. 49 5.5 Short Circuit Analysis ....................................................................................................... 51 iv 6.0 Transmission Alternatives- Long Term Assessment (2017) .............. 52 6.1 Power Flow Analysis (2017) ............................................................................................. 52 6.1.1 System Performance under Category C and D Contingency Events ...................... 52 6.2 2017 Transient Stability Studies (2017) ........................................................................... 53 6.3 Voltage Stability (P-V and Q-V) Analysis ......................................................................... 53 6.4 Transfer Capability Analysis ............................................................................................. 54 6.5 Short Circuit Analysis ....................................................................................................... 55 7.0 Comparison of Alternatives .................................................................. 56 8.0 Sensitivity Analysis (Load Forecast) .................................................... 60 8.1 Sensitivity Analysis for 2012 ............................................................................................. 60 8.2 Sensitivity Analysis for 2017 ............................................................................................. 61 8.3 Sensitivity Study Conclusions ........................................................................................... 61 9.0 Recommended Development ................................................................ 62 9.1 Rationale for the Recommended Development ............................................................... 65 v LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1: General Acceptable Range of Voltage (kV) ................................................................ 11 Table 2-2: Acceptable Voltage Deviation and Equipment Loading .............................................. 11 Table 2-3: Buses Voltage (kV) Range in the Red Deer Area (OPP 702) ..................................... 11 Table 2-4: Voltage Stability Criteria .............................................................................................. 13 Table 2-5: Summary of Monitored Areas for Load flow Analysis ................................................. 14 Table 2-6: Assumptions for Import/Export to BC and SK (MW) ................................................... 15 Table 2-7: Assumptions for HVDC Dispatch in 2017 (MW) ......................................................... 15 Table 2-8: Load Forecast Modeled in Red Deer Region (MW) .................................................... 15 Table 2-9: Rated Capacity for Existing Generation in the Red Deer Region ............................... 16 Table 2-10:Generation Dispatch (MW) .......................................................................................... 17 Table 2-11:Transmission Line Ratings in the Red Deer Region ................................................... 17 Table 2-12:Transformer Ratings in Red Deer Region ................................................................... 19 Table 4-1: List of the Common Set of Transmission System Developments ............................... 36 Table 4-2: 2012 List of Alternative 1 Development Excluding Common Set of Transmission System Developments ................................................................................................. 38 Table 5-1: Power Flow Analysis Results – 2012 .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHAT's INSIDE Bridges & Roads Infrastructure Upgrades in 2015
    Red Deer County JANUARYNews JANUARY 2015 2015 PAGE 1 Exciting New Year Ahead Progressive Growth, Traditional Values Infrastructure Upgrades Bridges & Roads in 2015 Discover Budget Highlights on Page 2 Facebook.com/ WHAT’S INSIDE reddeercounty YEAR OF THE WETLAND... ..................... PAGE 9 FIRE SERVICE AWARDS... ..................... PAGE 10 Follow us on Twitter DEVELOPMENT STATS... ...............PAGE 19 & 20 @reddeercounty GALAXY the right choice LANTERN STREET RED DEER “Proud to be in Red Deer County” 76471A3 Gasoline Alley, Red Deer County • www.reddeertoyota.com 403-343-3736 1-800-662-7166 Red Deer County News JANUARY 2015 PAGE 2 JANUARY 23, 2007 Red Deer County Approves 2015 Budget County funding a wide variety of local initiatives and infrastructure. The 2015 Operating and Capital budgets of more than $6M, as several major one-off were approved by Council at their regular projects are now completed. 2015 will see no Some highlights of the 2015 meeting on December 9. The budget was changes in special levies; the Environmental budget include: passed unanimously by Council, and took levy remains at 0.1590, Protective Services into account the public feedback gathered remains at 0.5000, and Community Services • Kevisville landfill reclamation project $1,500,000 over the past two weeks. remains at 0.4000. • Bridge repairs $4,100,000 Mayor Jim Wood commented, “Red Deer Heather Gray, Director of Corporate Services • Road paving program $6,000,000 County Council is pleased to see an overall for the County said, “We remain in a very • Airport expansion request $1,727,500 decrease in capital spending, while still healthy fiscal position.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    News Release Schools assist 24 non-profit organizations throughout Central Alberta For immediate release – June 16, 2020 Red Deer Catholic Regional Schools spans across four counties (Clearwater County, Lacombe County, Mountain View County and Red Deer County) and operates 21 schools throughout Central Alberta. Each year our schools participate in a variety of activities that enhance our communities through responsible social action. We call it “social justice.” Social justice projects incorporate faith through servantship by giving back to the community. In addition to helping our school communities through a variety of school-wide projects and initiatives, our schools assisted the following organizations during the 2019-2020 school year: 1. Red Deer Food Bank Society 2. Sylvan Lake Food Bank Society 3. Blackfalds Food Bank 4. The Lord’s Food Bank 5. Mountain View Food Bank 6. Innisfail and Area Food Bank 7. The Mustard Seed 8. Safe Harbour Society 9. Central Alberta Humane Society 10. Central Alberta Children’s Advocacy Centre 11. Ronald McDonald House of Central Alberta 12. Pregnancy Care Centre 13. Terry Fox Foundation 14. Catholic Social Services 15. Red Deer Hospice Society (St. Joseph High School Grad Service Project) 16. Kerry Wood Nature Centre (École Secondaire Notre Dame High School Grad Service Project) 17. Bethany Sylvan Lake 18. Victoria Park Red Deer 19. Rocky Mountain House Hospital 20. Chalice Child News Release 21. THINKfast 22. St. Vincent de Paul Society 23. World Wildlife Fund 24. Movember Foundation Other meaningful
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 04 10 12 14 Corporate Overview Board Chair & Ceo Messages 2014 Highlights Our Operations
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 04 10 12 14 CORPORATE OVERVIEW BOARD CHAIR & CEO MESSAGES 2014 HIGHLIGHTS OUR OPERATIONS 02 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 24 28 30 32 ECO CENTRE AWARD OUR COMMUNITIES OUR PEOPLE FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 03 WHO WE ARE Aquatera is a full-service utility corporation – the provider of choice for governments, businesses and communities. Our business is to provide high-quality utility services and optimize value to consumers, the environment, and shareholders. WHAT WE DO • We provide safe drinking water for community health. • We provide utility services that foster regional prosperity. • We are stewards of air, land and water. VISION To be the most innovative municipal company in Canada by 2020. By 2020, we will: • Generate $25 million in cash flow • Be below the median Alberta utility rate • Double our dividends to shareholders • Enhance the public trust by prudently managing company risks 04 2014 ANNUAL REPORT OUR PRINCIPLES All Aquatera employees endorse and commit to exemplifying the following principles that have been established by our board. These principles will guide our actions and ensure our success: • Be an exemplary employer • Provide first class customer service • Model environmental stewardship • Expand markets within the bounds of a • Ensure an appropriate balance between profitability sound business approach and affordability • Communicate to enhance understanding, • Innovate and lead in the development of best practices acceptance and support 05 CORE VALUES We commit to the following Core Values, which guide our day-to-day operations and our interactions with our customers, partners, suppliers and each other. QUALITY RESPECT We provide quality customer service by: We are environmental stewards, always meeting and • doing the right job right the first time striving to exceed environmental standards while • demonstrating pride in our work seeking to minimize the environmental impact of • always meeting our standards our services.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Single Line Diagrams (Slds)
    Single Line Diagrams (SLDs) AESO 2020 Long-term Transmission Plan FILED JANUARY 2020 Contents NEAR TERM REGIONAL TRANSMISSION PLANS 3 Northwest Planning Region 4 Northeast Planning Region 5 Edmonton Planning Region 6 Central Planning Region 7 South Planning Region 8 Calgary Planning Region 9 LONGER TERM ALBERTA-WIDE TRANSMISSION PLANS BY SCENARIO 10 Reference Case 11 High Cogeneration Sensitivity 12 Alternate Renewables Policy 13 High Load Growth 14 Table of Contents AESO 2020 Long-term Transmission Plan Single Line Diagrams (SLDs) NEAR TERM REGIONAL TRANSMISSION PLANS Northwest Planning Region Northeast Planning Region Edmonton Planning Region Central Planning Region South Planning Region Calgary Planning Region Rainbow #5 Rainbow Lake (RB5) #1 (RL1) RAINBOW ZAMA HIGH LEVEL 9 SULPHURPOINT 2 17 - Rainbow Lake COGEN 850S 795S 7L 786S 7L76 L 7 828S 7 2 7L 122 BASSETT 7L133 BLUMENORT RAINBOW 3 747S CHINCHAGA L9 832S LAKE 791S 7 7L64 RIVER 779S 7L1 9 MELITO 09 5 ) 7L o d 7LA59 890S t ARCENIEL ( o S 1 o 0 8 930S 7 6 w L 5 9 h 7 L Wescup 3 KEG RIVER c k 9 r 1 HAIG i e 1 B e 789S r 7 L RIVER 8 2 C 5 FORT NELSON 7 5 6 3 748S L L KEMP RIVER L FNG 7 7 1 RING CREEK 797S 1L359 18 - High Level 853S 7L120 MEIKLE 25 - Fort to ( d 4 o 7L138 905S 4 o ) McMurray L S 2 kw 1 1 ic 5 7L82 7L63 h 9 Fort Nelson T s Harvest ill (FNG1) CADOTTE H PetroCan Energy FNC RIVER 783S 6 1 KLC 0 3 1 1 HAMBURG L L LIVOCK LIVOCK British Columbia HOTCHKISS 7 7 NORCEN 855S West Cadotte KIDNEY LAKE 939S 500 kV 788S 1 Daishowa (WCD1) 812S 878S 5 SEAL L (DAI1) 7 BUCHANAN LAKE 869S
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Association of Recreation Facility Personnel ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING MINUTES Tuesday April 26, 2016
    Alberta Association Of Recreation Facility Personnel ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING MINUTES Tuesday April 26, 2016 Attended by 129 Constituted members 1. Call to Order President Sandi Stewart (Lacombe) called the meeting to order at 10:15am on April 26, 2016 in Drumheller. Sandi introduced the board members of the Association that were in attendance and welcomed all members old and new who were attending the conference. We had 75 new attendees at conference. 2. Approval of the Agenda Motion by Russell Ferris (Red Deer): “That we accept the agenda as presented on page 1 of the Annual Report.” Second by Calvin Bennefield (Lacombe) Carried 3. Approval of the Minutes of the Annual General Meeting April 28, 2015 Motion by Willie Jurcevic (Calgary): “That we accept the minutes from the Annual General Meeting April 28, 2015 in Banff as presented on pages 2-7 of the Annual report.” Seconded by Allan King (Stettler) Carried 4. Business Arising from the Minutes There was no business arising for the minutes 5. Executive Reports as Circulated * President Sandi Stewart Lacombe * Treasurer Dawn Mercerau Camrose * Education Rep. Sonia Dodd Stettler * Associate Rep. Ryan Jones Calgary * Executive Director Stuart Ray Cochrane Motion by Chris McKenna (Blackfalds): “to accept as information the Executive Board Reports as presented on pages 12-23 of the 2015 Annual Report.” Seconded by Edith Martin (St Albert) Carried 6. New Business A. 2015 Financial Report Dawn Mercereau (Camrose) presented the financial report to the members for information. Motion by Dawn Mercereau (Camrose): “that the membership accepts as information the 2015 Financial Report as presented on Pages 24-28 of the 2015 Annual Report.” Seconded by Colleen Sparrow (Edmonton) Carried 1-Abstained B.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation in Action
    RED DEER COUNTY NEWS OFFICIAL NEWS FROM RED DEER COUNTY CENTRE JULY 2015 CONSERVATION IN AcTION COUNTY HELPS LANDOWNERS CONSERVE 70 ACRES By Ken Lewis, Conservation Coordinator On June 24, 2015, Red Deer County viewed three new conservation projects: a riparian management fence, a watering system to help conserve wetlands, and a watering system to help conserve a creek. For local landowners like Audrey Daines, wetlands have always been an important feature in providing clean water and a healthy landscape. By fencing off their wetland, it will remain a vital place for local wildlife and ground water. Henrik and Jeralyn Rasmussen rent the pasture where they installed their portable watering system. They made sure to purchase enough waterline and wiring, so that they can move the system around to WHAT’S INSIDE: multiple paddocks and water sources as part of their grazing rotation. The creek that Conservation Partners is helping conserve with an off-site watering system is part of the Transit Use on the Rise...........Pg. 2 Waskasoo Creek watershed, which flows right through the City of Red Deer before joining the Red Deer River. So, the connections between these pastures and the perceptions that the general public has about Air Quality Response Plan ....Pg. 8 agriculture in Red Deer County are very direct. Home Safety Quiz ................Pg. 20 These three new projects are just three of the 33 plus projects that Red Deer County landowners have done or are planning to do this year with funding support from Conservation Partners and/or the Alternative Land Use Services program.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetaskiwin County Health Data and Summary
    Alberta Health Primary Health Care - Community Profiles Community Profile: Wetaskiwin County Health Data and Summary Primary Health Care Division February 2013 Alberta Health, Primary Health Care Division February 2013 Community Profile: Wetaskiwin County Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. i Community Profile Summary .............................................................................................................. iii Zone Level Information .......................................................................................................................... 1 Map of Alberta Health Services Central Zone .......................................................................................... 2 Population Health Indicators ..................................................................................................................... 3 Table 1.1 Zone versus Alberta Population Covered as at March 31, 2012 ........................................... 3 Table 1.2 Health Status Indicators for Zone versus Alberta Residents, 2010 and 2011 (BMI, Physical Activity, Smoking, Self-Perceived Mental Health) ............................................................................................... 3 Table 1.3 Zone versus Alberta Infant Mortality Rates (per 1,000 live births) Fiscal Years 2008/2009 to 2010/2011 ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Published Local Histories
    ALBERTA HISTORIES Published Local Histories assembled by the Friends of Geographical Names Society as part of a Local History Mapping Project (in 1995) May 1999 ALBERTA LOCAL HISTORIES Alphabetical Listing of Local Histories by Book Title 100 Years Between the Rivers: A History of Glenwood, includes: Acme, Ardlebank, Bancroft, Berkeley, Hartley & Standoff — May Archibald, Helen Bircham, Davis, Delft, Gobert, Greenacres, Kia Ora, Leavitt, and Brenda Ferris, e , published by: Lilydale, Lorne, Selkirk, Simcoe, Sterlingville, Glenwood Historical Society [1984] FGN#587, Acres and Empires: A History of the Municipal District of CPL-F, PAA-T Rocky View No. 44 — Tracey Read , published by: includes: Glenwood, Hartley, Hillspring, Lone Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44 [1989] Rock, Mountain View, Wood, FGN#394, CPL-T, PAA-T 49ers [The], Stories of the Early Settlers — Margaret V. includes: Airdrie, Balzac, Beiseker, Bottrell, Bragg Green , published by: Thomasville Community Club Creek, Chestermere Lake, Cochrane, Conrich, [1967] FGN#225, CPL-F, PAA-T Crossfield, Dalemead, Dalroy, Delacour, Glenbow, includes: Kinella, Kinnaird, Thomasville, Indus, Irricana, Kathyrn, Keoma, Langdon, Madden, 50 Golden Years— Bonnyville, Alta — Bonnyville Mitford, Sampsontown, Shepard, Tribune , published by: Bonnyville Tribune [1957] Across the Smoky — Winnie Moore & Fran Moore, ed. , FGN#102, CPL-F, PAA-T published by: Debolt & District Pioneer Museum includes: Bonnyville, Moose Lake, Onion Lake, Society [1978] FGN#10, CPL-T, PAA-T 60 Years: Hilda’s Heritage,
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Users Group Members
    RED DEER RIVER MUNICIPAL USERS GROUP LOOKING BACK – GOING FORWARD 2006 – 2020 2020 - 2025 1 Water is the lifeblood of municipalities. It is vital for municipal sustainability, including economic viability, environmental integrity, social well-being and cultural vibrancy. Red Deer Municipal Users Group HANDBOOK ROLES, PERSPECTIVES and CONTENT R0LES: The roles of this handbook are: wetlands) are not overlooked. They are considered To serve as an introduction to the Red Deer as important related aspects of watershed River Municipal Users Group (“MUG”), its conservation and source water protection. interest in water and matters related to water CONTENT: The first part of the handbook provides To guide future MUG activities in response an overview of the Red Deer River Municipal Users to Red Deer River watershed water Group, its interest and roles in water and water resource management priorities identified management, and some fundamental background by MUG and views of water in southern Alberta, including the To provide background information for Red Deer River system. The second part addresses MUG municipal members, other five priority water management issues identified by municipalities and other sectors with MUG early in 2020. interests in water and the future well-being of communities, the economy and the CONTEXT: in this report, unless otherwise stated: environment throughout the Red Deer “Municipalities” refers to municipalities River watershed. within the Red Deer River Watershed and/or receive water from the Red Deer River for PERSPECTIVES: The handbook has two basic municipal, agricultural and other licenced perspectives. The first is to spotlights the key uses. municipal interests in water and their roles in the “Watershed” refers to the Red Deer River use, conservation and management of water.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Municipal Codes
    2018 Municipal Codes Updated November 23, 2018 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] 2018 MUNICIPAL CHANGES STATUS / NAME CHANGES: 4353-Effective January 1, 2018 Lac La Biche County became the Specialized Municipality of Lac La Biche County. 0236-Effective February 28, 2018 Village of Nobleford became the Town of Nobleford. AMALGAMATED: FORMATIONS: 6619- Effective April 10, 2018 Bonnyville Regional Water Services Commission formed as a Regional service commission. 6618- Effective April 10, 2018 South Pigeon Lake Regional Wastewater Services Commission formed as a Regional service commission. DISSOLVED: CODE NUMBERS RESERVED: 4737 Capital Region Board 0524 R.M. of Brittania (Sask.) 0462 Townsite of Redwood Meadows 5284 Calgary Regional Partnership STATUS CODES: 01 Cities (18)* 15 Hamlet & Urban Services Areas (396) 09 Specialized Municipalities (6) 20 Services Commissions (73) 06 Municipal Districts (63) 25 First Nations (52) 02 Towns (109) 26 Indian Reserves (138) 03 Villages (86) 50 Local Government Associations (22) 04 Summer Villages (51) 60 Emergency Districts (12) 07 Improvement Districts (8) 98 Reserved Codes (4) 08 Special Areas (4) 11 Metis Settlements (8) * (Includes Lloydminster) November 23, 2018 Page 1 of 14 CITIES CODE CITIES CODE NO. NO. Airdrie 0003 Brooks 0043 Calgary 0046 Camrose 0048 Chestermere 0356 Cold Lake 0525 Edmonton 0098 Fort Saskatchewan 0117 Grande Prairie 0132 Lacombe 0194 Leduc 0200 Lethbridge 0203 Lloydminster* 0206 Medicine Hat 0217 Red Deer 0262 Spruce Grove 0291 St. Albert 0292 Wetaskiwin 0347 *Alberta only SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITY CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision 3585-D03-2016 Altalink 2012 and 2013 Deferral Accounts
    Decision 3585-D03-2016 AltaLink Management Ltd. 2012 and 2013 Deferral Accounts Reconciliation Application June 6, 2016 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 3585-D03-2016: AltaLink Management Ltd. 2012 and 2013 Deferral Accounts Reconciliation Application Proceeding 3585 Application 1611090-1 June 6, 2016 Published by The Alberta Utilities Commission Fifth Avenue Place, Fourth Floor, 425 First Street S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3L8 Telephone: 403-592-8845 Fax: 403-592-4406 Website: www.auc.ab.ca Contents 1 Decision .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 Introduction, procedural schedules and motions ............................................................... 2 3 Background to the application and structure of the decision ........................................... 4 4 Direct assign capital deferral account ................................................................................. 8 4.1 Common matters ............................................................................................................ 8 4.1.1 Inclusion of partially completed projects .......................................................... 8 4.1.2 Accuracy and purpose of baseline estimates .................................................. 10 4.1.3 Rate impact to customers ................................................................................ 13 4.1.4 Impact of disallowance ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Convocation 2020 Program, You Can Sincerely Hope You Can Share and Celebrate This Achievement Goal
    2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200 2200
    [Show full text]