DOCSLIB.ORG

WELLINGTON PROJECT INITIATIVE an Assessment of the Feasibility of Establishing an IQP Center in Wellington, New Zealand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WELLINGTON PROJECT INITIATIVE an Assessment of the Feasibility of Establishing an IQP Center in Wellington, New Zealand WELLINGTON PROJECT INITIATIVE An Assessment of the Feasibility of Establishing an IQP Center in Wellington, New Zealand. Interactive Qualifying Project Report completed in partial fulfillment of the Bachelor of Science degree at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA Submitted to: Professor Michael B. Elmes In Cooperation With: Richard Vaz, Dean of IGSD Natalie Mello, Director of Global Operations Sponsoring Agency: WPI – Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Division Submitted By: Charles Fancher Rachel Heller Nathan Nesbitt Skyler Whorton Scott Woodnorth ___________________________ Advisor Signature Date: May 1st, 2009 [email protected] 0 AB Abstract This feasibility study, prepared for Worcester Polytechnic Institute, details how Wellington, New Zealand could serve the university as an international site for students to complete their Interactive Qualifying Project (IQP). We used preferences of faculty and students derived from survey results, guidelines provided by the university, and information about existing sites to outline qualities appropriate for a new IQP site. Through a literature review and on site investigation, we assessed Wellington‘s suitability and recommended that WPI establish the center. 1 TC Table of Contents TI Title Page ................................................................................................................................. 0 AB Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 1 TC Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... 2 TF Table of Figures ....................................................................................................................... 7 TT Table of Tables ........................................................................................................................ 8 TE Table of Equations ................................................................................................................... 9 TA Table of Authors .................................................................................................................... 10 ES Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 13 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 17 2 Background & Literature Review ......................................................................................... 19 2.1 Conducting a Feasibility Study ...................................................................................... 19 2.1.1 Determining the need for a Feasibility Study using Market Analysis .................... 19 2.1.2 The Purpose of a Feasibility Study ......................................................................... 21 2.1.3 The Outcomes of a Feasibility Study ...................................................................... 22 2.2 Challenges Faced by WPI Project Centers ..................................................................... 22 2.2.1 The IQP and Learning Outcomes ........................................................................... 23 2.2.2 Increasing Enrollment and Demand for Project Centers ........................................ 24 2.2.3 Requirements for a Project Center .......................................................................... 25 2.2.4 Housing for Students and Faculty ........................................................................... 25 2.2.5 Availability of Suitable Project Sponsors ............................................................... 29 2.2.6 Logistical Necessities.............................................................................................. 31 2.3 Wellington, New Zealand as a Possible Project Center ................................................. 35 2.3.1 New Zealand‘s Unique History .............................................................................. 35 2.3.2 Wellington as a Cultural Center .............................................................................. 38 2.3.3 Weather ................................................................................................................... 41 2.3.4 Safety ...................................................................................................................... 41 2.3.5 New Zealand‘s Health Care System ....................................................................... 46 2.3.6 WPI‘s Health Insurance Plan .................................................................................. 47 2.3.7 Telecommunications in New Zealand .................................................................... 49 2.3.8 Historic Exchange Rate........................................................................................... 51 3 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 53 3.1 Project Sponsor Acquisition ........................................................................................... 54 2 3.1.1 First Contact ............................................................................................................ 54 3.1.2 Further Development and Expansion...................................................................... 55 3.1.3 Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 56 3.1.4 Assessment .............................................................................................................. 57 3.2 Housing Research ........................................................................................................... 58 3.2.1 Evaluating Potential Housing ................................................................................. 59 3.2.2 Recommending New Zealand Housing .................................................................. 65 3.3 Logistical Necessities ..................................................................................................... 66 3.3.1 Airfare ..................................................................................................................... 66 3.3.2 Telecommunications ............................................................................................... 68 3.3.3 Groceries ................................................................................................................. 69 3.3.4 Dining Out .............................................................................................................. 69 3.3.5 Weekend Excursions and Tourist activities ............................................................ 70 3.4 ―Section 3‖ of Project Center Guide .............................................................................. 71 3.4.1 Medical Facilities .................................................................................................... 72 3.4.2 Maps ........................................................................................................................ 73 3.4.3 Safety ...................................................................................................................... 73 3.5 Student and Faculty Research ........................................................................................ 73 3.5.1 Faculty Population .................................................................................................. 74 3.5.2 Student Population .................................................................................................. 75 3.5.3 Research Questions ................................................................................................. 77 3.5.4 Implementation of the Student Survey ................................................................... 78 3.5.5 Implementation of the Faculty Survey .................................................................... 79 3.6 Determining Expnses to WPI ......................................................................................... 79 3.6.1 Center Director Annual Visit .................................................................................. 79 3.6.2 Faculty Advisor Expenses....................................................................................... 80 4 Data & Analysis .................................................................................................................... 81 4.0 Project Sponsors ............................................................................................................. 81 4.0.1 Combined Sponsor Contacts ................................................................................... 81 4.0.2 Expected Sponsor Analysis..................................................................................... 93 4.1 Housing .......................................................................................................................... 95 4.1.1 Annaday Homestay ................................................................................................. 96 4.1.2 Tinakori Lodge........................................................................................................ 97 4.1.3 Capital Nomad Backpackers ................................................................................... 98 3 4.1.4 Wellywood Backpackers .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cutting Edge
    CUTTING EDGE Issue No 78 | July 2021 Aotearoa New Zealand National Committee Philippa Mercer (Chair) FROM THE CHAIR INSIDE Advocacy matters he recent Annual Scientific Congress concern about the need for better national THIS ISSUE T(ASC) Aotearoa New Zealand hub health planning to look after the health of with more than 150 attendees and the New Zealanders and ensure there is an 2 Outstanding New Zealand Association of General appropriate health workforce for Aotearoa contributions to surgery Surgeons’ New Plymouth conference, New Zealand. recognised which was also well attended, have The current health workforce is ageing reminded me that meeting colleagues and not easily replaced. Larger centres 3 Surgery 2021 and Trainees at conferences is important. have seen an inexorable increase in acute There were introductions to new faces, 4 Louis Barnett Prize – and complex elective cases every year. catching up with old friends and talking call for abstracts The growing population and increased about cases or problems in between the complexity of cases need a greater surgical main sessions, all in very easy locations. RACS Trainees capacity. Existing surgeons’ workload is It was an honour to see the 11 new Association update increasing and burnout is occurring. There Fellows receive their certificates and has been no or little expansion of elective humbling to meet the award recipients at 5 Activities of the AoNZ and acute services. Otolaryngology Head the ASC Convocation. Their contribution National Committee and Neck surgery and Vascular surgery to surgery in New Zealand has been have particular examples of this problem, immense. 6 ASC Aotearoa New but they are not alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Jono Rotman: Mongrel Mob Portraits City Gallery Wellington 14 March – 14 June 2015 Curated by Robert Leonard and Aaron Lister
    One of the functions of art is to transmit a reality that might be marginalised or missed in the cacophony of glib stimuli vying for our attention. Jono Rotman has carefully, respectfully insinuated himself into the culture of gangs, earning their trust. That trust is embodied in his Mongrel Mob Portraits. His subjects’ faces, tattoos, and insignia signify their alienation and marginalisation from mainstream society. The image of gangs portrayed to the general public is the incarnation of the white man’s worst nightmare, the emergence of a threatening monster from the ashes of the ‘noble savage’ portrayed by Lindauer and Goldie. These portraits challenge us to ask: what are the hidden and untold stories that underlie them? —Dr Ranginui Walker Dr Ranginui Walker (Whakatōhea) is an academic, author, historian, commentator, activist, and iwi consultant. He has been Professor and Head of Māori Studies at the University of Auckland, and, since his retirement, has been on the Waitangi Tribunal. In 2009, Dr Walker received the honour of the Distinguished Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit. Aaron Rogue 2009, C-type photograph, 1.5 x 1.2m. COVER Sean Wellington and Sons 2009, C-type photograph, 1.9 x 1.5m. Exchange: Jono Rotman’s Mongrel Mob Portraits Aaron Lister We are always looking and looking away at the same time. —W.G. Sebald, On the Natural History of Destruction (1998) THE EXPERIENCE OF the trial is itself photographic. Ushered into the public gallery of the courtroom with the warning that interest in the trial is likely to be significant following that controversial exhibition in Auckland, the conditions of viewing and my status as observer are continually reinforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Flood Group.Pdf
    i Abstract This project provided the Greater Wellington Regional Council with community-input based recommendations for improving their current flood warning system on the Waiwhetu stream to promote a more people-based warning system. We achieved this by researching their current warning system, developing preparedness materials, and investigating the community’s perceptions of preparedness, awareness, and the current system. We recommended implementing tiered, redundant early warning media including Emergency Mobile Alerts and voice sirens, a flood preparedness campaign, and an all- stakeholder “one-stop shop” website. ii Executive Summary Introduction Natural disasters have killed nearly three million people in the last 20 years, and the United Nations predicts disasters will become more lethal (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction [UN/ISDR], 2015). Warning systems decrease risk from these disasters by allowing robust community action before disasters occur. These systems tie together strategies for early detection, communication, and public preparedness as community preference and the expected severity of disasters require. In the Lower Hutt region of New Zealand, the implementation of these strategies for flooding do not meet the standards necessitated by the severity of flooding in the region or the preferences of the community, requiring the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) to revamp their systems in an effort called the ‘Flood Warning Improvement Project.’ Our role within this project is to collect feedback from the community on communication preferences and public preparedness as a pilot program for the wider project. Background In the last 20 years, 4.4 billion people have been affected by disasters at the cost of US$4.8 trillion, mainly affecting lower- income communities without resources to protect themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Census of Prison Inmates and Home Detainees 2003
    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Census of Prison Inmates and Home Detainees 2003 David Harpham Strategic Analysis Policy Development Group Department of Corrections November 2004 Published in November 2004 Department of Corrections Private Box 1206 Wellington New Zealand © Crown Copyright ISSN 1176-5100 Introduction A census of prison inmates has been carried out biennially in November since 1987. The Department of Justice administered the census until 1993, and the Ministry of Justice until 1997. The Department of Corrections took over this responsibility in 1999. The current census provides statistical data on inmates within the prison system as at 20 November 2003. The census contains data on offender age, ethnicity, sentence details, offending history, gang membership, education, income, children and marriage, iwi affiliation, programmes and activities, use of medication, and other topics. The purpose of the census exercise is to provide updated information concerning key characteristics of the New Zealand inmate population. Taken together with previous censuses, trends and patterns in this population may be identified. Information was collected from several sources. For the first time, the census used the Department of Corrections’ Integrated Offender Management System (IOMS) database as the primary data source. To obtain details not normally recorded in IOMS, a supplementary census questionnaire (comprising a small number of questions) was then sent to prison staff to complete in interview with inmates. Prison health services staff also collated numbers of inmates on medication, and programme personnel collated numbers of inmates on programmes. Inmate numbers tend to fluctuate in a predictable manner over the course of each week. The general pattern is mainly a function of prison releases occurring on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays.
    [Show full text]
  • AN EXPLORATION INTO WHANGANUI GANG IDENTITY By
    PATCHING UP THE DIFFERENCES: AN EXPLORATION INTO WHANGANUI GANG IDENTITY by Feona Jessica Sayles A thesis submitted to the faculty of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy January 2021 Copyright © Feona Jessica Sayles 2020 All Rights Reserved i ABSTRACT The District Council (Prohibition of Gang Insignia) Act 2009 (‘Gang Insignia Act 2009’) came into force in 2009 and prohibited the ‘display’ of ‘gang insignia’ within ‘specified areas’ of the Whanganui District. The purported aim of the legislation was to reduce intimidation of the public and confrontations between gangs. There was no requirement for intent on the part of the wearer of the insignia. This made the Whanganui gang insignia ban unique in terms of criminal law as it maintained that harm was inflicted due to group identity rather than specific conduct. This raises the question of how an identity can be constructed so that it is considered capable of causing criminal harm. To address this question, this research looked at the ways in which the media contributed to the construction of gang identity during the period of 2004 to 2013. This was achieved through (1) a content analysis of reports from three print newspapers and two online newspapers, (2) a content analysis of reader interactions with the reports, and (3) a textual analysis of two print newspapers. The research was guided by moral panic theory so looked for ways in which the events related to stages or elements of moral panic. The focus of the moral panic was also expanded so as to explore the overall context operating at the particular time.
    [Show full text]
  • [2017] NZCA 498 BETWEEN CLAYTON KERR Appellant AND
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA49/2017 [2017] NZCA 498 BETWEEN CLAYTON KERR Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent CA185/2017 BETWEEN WAYNE JONES Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 5 September 2017 Court: French, Williams and Woolford JJ Counsel: H B Leabourn for Appellant in CA49/2017 W T Nabney for Appellant in CA185/2017 S K Barr for Respondent Judgment: 2 November 2017 at 11.00 am JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A The appeal by Mr Jones against conviction is dismissed. B The appeals by Mr Kerr and Mr Jones against sentence are allowed. C Mr Kerr’s sentence of 11 years and six months’ imprisonment is quashed. Concurrent sentences of nine years and two months’ imprisonment for KERR v R [2017] NZCA 498 [2 November 2017] aggravated robbery, three months’ imprisonment for robbery and six months’ imprisonment for receiving are imposed. The other aspects of the sentence are confirmed. D Mr Jones’ sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment is quashed. A sentence of eight years and six months’ imprisonment is substituted. ____________________________________________________________________ REASONS OF THE COURT (Given by Woolford J) Introduction [1] Following a jury trial before Judge Harding of four defendants in the Tauranga District Court between 3 and 10 October 2016, the first appellant, Clayton Kerr, was convicted of two charges of aggravated robbery,1 one charge of robbery,2 and one charge of receiving.3 The second appellant, Wayne Jones, was convicted of the same two charges of aggravated robbery.4 Judge Harding sentenced Mr Kerr to 11 years and six months’ imprisonment,5 while he sentenced Mr Jones to 10 years’ imprisonment.6 Mr Kerr now appeals against sentence only, while Mr Jones appeals against both conviction and sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Jazz Among the Discourses
    1 OUTSIDE IN: WELLINGTON JAZZ AMONG THE DISCOURSES BY NICHOLAS PETER TIPPING A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2016 2 Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. 5 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction: Conundrums, questions, contexts ..................................................................... 9 Sounds like home: New Zealand Music ............................................................................... 15 ‘Jazz’ and ‘jazz’...................................................................................................................... 17 Performer as Researcher ...................................................................................................... 20 Discourses ............................................................................................................................ 29 Conundrums ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Mile Engagement Report June
    GOLDEN MILE Engagement summary report June – August 2020 Executive Summary Across the three concepts, the level of change could be relatively small or could completely transform the road and footpath space. The Golden Mile, running along Lambton Quay, Willis Street, Manners Street and 1. “Streamline” takes some general traffic off the Golden Mile to help Courtenay Place, is Wellington’s prime employment, shopping and entertainment make buses more reliable and creates new space for pedestrians. destination. 2. “Prioritise” goes further by removing all general traffic and allocating extra space for bus lanes and pedestrians. It is the city’s busiest pedestrian area and is the main bus corridor; with most of the 3. “Transform” changes the road layout to increase pedestrian space city’s core bus routes passing along all or part of the Golden Mile everyday. Over the (75% more), new bus lanes and, in some places, dedicated areas for people next 30 years the population is forecast to grow by 15% and demand for travel to and on bikes and scooters. from the city centre by public transport is expected to grow by between 35% and 50%. What we asked The Golden Mile Project From June to August 2020 we asked Wellingtonians to let us know what that they liked or didn’t like about each concept and why. We also asked people to tell us The Golden Mile project is part of the Let’s Get Wellington Moving programme. The which concept they preferred for the different sections of the Golden Mile, as we vision for the project is “connecting people across the central city with a reliable understand that each street that makes up the Golden Mile is different, and a public transport system that is in balance with an attractive pedestrian environment”.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Region Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Plan
    Wellington Region Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Plan EM_cover_FINAL.indd 1 21/4/05 10:51:51 AM Contents Foreword 5 Plan structure 6 1. Introduction 6 2. The Wellington Region 6 3. Strategic direction 6 4. Operational framework 6 5. Administrative arrangements 6 6. Monitoring and review 6 Part 1 - Introduction 7 1. What is this Plan? 7 2. Who is the Plan for? 7 2.1 Local Authorities 7 2.2 Other emergency management agencies 7 3. Duration of Plan and review 8 4. Relationship with the National CDEM Plan and the National CDEM Strategy 8 5. Requirement for local authority civil defence emergency management planning 8 6. How the Plan was prepared 8 7. Supporting documentation 9 8. Local procedures 9 Part 2 – The Wellington Region 10 9. Key characteristics of the Wellington Region 10 10. The Region’s people 11 11. Signifi cant emergency events in the Wellington Region 12 12. What does this mean for CDEM? 13 Part 3 - Strategic direction 15 13. Introduction 15 14. Strategic planning framework 15 15. Vision 16 16. Goals 16 16.1 Plan goals 16 16.2 Relationship to the National CDEM Strategy 16 Wellington Region Civil Defence Emergency 1 Management Group Plan 17. Summary of hazards 17 17.1 Earthquake 17 17.2 Tsunami 18 17.3 Volcanic hazards 19 17.4 Storms 19 17.5 Flooding 20 17.6 Landslides 21 17.7 Drought and extreme heat 21 17.8 Fire (Rural) 22 17.9 Fire (Urban) 22 17.10 Hazardous substances 23 17.11 Transportation accident (land, marine, air) 23 17.12 Biological and public health hazards 24 17.13 Agricultural hazards (animal diseases, biosecurity) 24 17.14 Disruption of infrastructure systems 25 17.15 Terrorism 25 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Metlink Network
    1 A B 2 KAP IS Otaki Beach LA IT 70 N I D C Otaki Town 3 Waikanae Beach 77 Waikanae Golf Course Kennedy PNL Park Palmerston North A North Beach Shannon Waikanae Pool 1 Levin Woodlands D Manly Street Kena Kena Parklands Otaki Railway 71 7 7 7 5 Waitohu School ,7 72 Kotuku Park 7 Te Horo Paraparaumu Beach Peka Peka Freemans Road Paraparaumu College B 7 1 Golf Road 73 Mazengarb Road Raumati WAIKANAE Beach Kapiti E 7 2 Arawhata Village Road 2 C 74 MA Raumati Coastlands Kapiti Health 70 IS Otaki Beach LA N South Kapiti Centre A N College Kapiti Coast D Otaki Town PARAPARAUMU KAP IS I Metlink Network Map PPL LA TI Palmerston North N PNL D D Shannon F 77 Waikanae Beach Waikanae Golf Course Levin YOUR KEY Waitohu School Kennedy Paekakariki Park Waikanae Pool Otaki Railway ro 3 Woodlands Te Ho Freemans Road Bus route Parklands E 69 77 Muri North Beach 75 Titahi Bay ,77 Limited service Pikarere Street 68 Peka Peka (less than hourly, Monday to Friday) Titahi Bay Beach Pukerua Bay Kena Kena Titahi Bay Shops G Kotuku Park Gloaming Hill PPL Bus route number Manly Street71 72 WAIKANAE Paraparaumu College 7 Takapuwahia 1 Plimmerton Paraparaumu Major bus stop Train line Porirua Beach Mazengarb Road F 60 Golf Road Elsdon Mana Bus direction 73 Train station PAREMATA Arawhata Mega Centre Raumati Kapiti Road Beach 72 Kapiti Health 8 Village Train, cable car 6 8 Centre Tunnel 6 Kapiti Coast Porirua City Cultural Centre 9 6 5 6 7 & ferry route 6 H Coastlands Interchange Porirua City Centre 74 G Kapiti Police Raumati College PARAPARAUMU College Papakowhai South
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Branch Newsletter – February 2010
    The Capital The Capital China Letter NEW ZEALAND CHINA FRIENDSHIP SOCIETY WELLINGTON BRANCH NEWSLETTER 12 Colchester Cres, Newlands, Wellington 6037. Website: www.nzchinasociety.org.nz No 1001 February 2010 HAPPY NEW YEAR! Xīn Nián Kuài Lè! CHINESE NEW YEAR BANQUET Come and join us to welcome in Sunday, 21st February 2010 at 6.30 pm Dragons Restaurant, 25 Tory St The Programme will include our traditional Quiz Contest and Raffles Ambassador Zhang Limin and Mayor Kerry Prendergast will be attending The cost is $34 per person including wine and juice To book, please send the attached form to the Treasurer by Friday, 12 th February . No last minute arrivals please. 1 MEETING DATES FOR 2010 Your committee has organised the following speakers for 2010. Please mark these dates in your diary. The programme for August/September will be confirmed later. Wednesday 17 March: AGM, Dr Hongzhi Gao Senior Lecturer in Marketing at Victoria University of Wellington “The Impact of the 2008 Milk Contamination Crisis in China” Wednesday 21 April: Barbara Francis Biographer of Agnes (Nessie) Moncrieff “A Remarkable New Zealander – Agnes (Nessie) Moncrieff And Her Work with the YWCA of China 1930-1945” Wednesday 19 May: Professor Brian Moloughney Head of School of Languages and Cultures at Victoria University of Wellington “China and World History” Sunday 20 June: Charmaine Pountney Formerly Principal of Auckland Girls’ Grammar School and Dean of Education at the University of Waikato “Returning To China After 28 Years – Some Reflections” Sunday 18 July: Peter
    [Show full text]
  • Multicultural New Zealand Impact Stories and Performance Report
    Multicultural New Zealand Impact Stories and Performance Report 2018 We appreciate the funding support from: Lottery Grants Todd Foundation Office of Ethnic Communities Ministry of Education Foundation North Wellington Community Trust First Sovereign Trust Limited Thank you Wellington City Council Auckland Council Lion Foundation Pelorus Trust Four Winds Foundation NZ National Commission for UNESCO The Southern Trust NZ Community Trust NZ Police MSD ANZ Bank Thank you to our strategic partners, associates and supporters New Zealand Police Human Rights Commission E Tu Whanau Victoria University Wellington (CACR) Hui E! Community Aotearoa English Language Partners Auckland University of Technology Pacific Media Center Auckland Refugees and Migrants Trust Migrants Action Trust Akina Foundation Network Waitangi Otautahi (NWO) CLANZ Social Service Providers Aoteoroa (SSPA) Cultural Connections MNZ Impact Stories and Performance Report | 2018 Impact Stories & Performance Report 2018 Highlights from the Annual Reports of the Regional Multicultural Councils The full Annual Reports of the Multicultural Councils are available directly from them or from the office of Multicultural New Zealand. This document reports on some of the achievements and activities of the Multicultural Councils during 2017-18. Contents President’s Report, Pancha Narayanan, 4 Performance Report 38 Multicultural New Zealand Entity Information 38 Executive Director’s Report, Tayo Agunlejika, 6 Statement of Service Performance 39 Multicultural New Zealand Statement of Financial
    [Show full text]