Toward a Missional Polity for the Episcopal Church. Dwight J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Toward a Missional Polity for the Episcopal Church. Dwight J Luther Seminary Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary Faculty Publications Faculty & Staff choS larship 2008 A More True ‘Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society’: Toward a Missional Polity for the Episcopal Church. Dwight J. Zscheile Luther Seminary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/faculty_articles Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Missions and World Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Zscheile, Dwight J., "A More True ‘Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society’: Toward a Missional Polity for the Episcopal Church." (2008). Faculty Publications. 303. https://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/faculty_articles/303 Published Citation Zscheile, Dwight J. “A More True ‘Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society’: Toward a Missional Polity for the Episcopal Church.” In The Missional Church and Denominations: Helping Congregations Develop a Missional Identity, edited by Craig Van Gelder, 133–65. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty & Staff choS larship at Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. reclaiming of a de­ CHAPTER 5 d's mission in the ation needs to be he Western tradi­ A More True "Domestic and Foreign d, and the Eastern Society": Toward a Missional Polity the Godhead. A!l Missionary understanding of for the Episcopal Church '.stology. This ap- 1s so essential for Jays authority and Dwight Zschcile rihe church. These �10. 1 ns mto conver- se four different elop the specific mination and its Tlierc is 110 rrnson i11 tlic world wherefore we should esteem it ns and leadership 11eccssary always to do, as always to l,c/ieve, the sa111c things; see­ n an attempt to illg every 111(111 knowet/z tlint tlzc matter of faitli is consta11t, the missional per­ 111ntter co11tmriwise of action daily clumgeable, especially tlie urce for people 11111tter of action bc/011gi11g 11nto clwrclz polity. 1 Richard Hooker, Laws of Ecc/csiastirnl Polity, IlI.x.J ecame organi­ . in denomina­ have a polity; Context, Polity, and the Episcopal Church >. All too often secular organi: r Christian church is always contextual. From the early ugh f om bib­ The polity of the of leadership roles from the first-century synagogue, I demonstrate church's adaptation of Roman models of office into the Constantinian ing examined, to the incorporation church, to Calvin's use of the assembly system in Reformed Geneva, Chris­ redemptively tians have always taken organizational and leadership structures from lo­ 2 cal cultures and transformed them for church use. In that process they have sought to integrate these structures with biblical and theological norms. The contextual nature of polity reflects the incarnationalnature of 1. Richard Honker, Ecclcsic1stic,1/ Pc,/ity, ed. Arthur Pollard (Manchest�r, UK: Care.ind, 1990), l'.!o. Hooker (1553/4-1000) is th<: classic early expon�nt of AngliL'illl polity. '. 2. See James Tunstead Burtchadl, fr,1111 SJ'll11,�o,:11e to C/111/'c/1: P11/1/ic Scn'iccs <111(/ ()/ fices i11 tl1c D11 Ii est c:/1ristin11 CcJ1111111111itics (New York: Cambrid ge Univer,ity Press, 1992). 133 Dwight Zschcilc the gospel ,rnd the church's life: Christianity is ,dways embodied in local society, whi cultures, embracing, calling into question, and transforming the norms the commis and presuppositions of those cultures.' As the Richard Hooker quotation bishop ofL abnve suggests, polity is dynamic and must adapt to the church's changing The cl contexts in order to serve, rather than constrain, God's mission. the Book of The current polity of the Episcopal Church (USA) reflects three ma­ jor contextual influences: (1) the established state church of the English Reformation and Colonial eras; (�) American representative democracy; America un and (3) modern corporate bureaucracy. However, the twenty-first-century system evol American context of the Episcopal Church is shifting dramatically, calling Virginia an, for ,l critical appraisal of the assumptions and norms embedded in its pol­ people (usu ity. In this chapter I seek to explore the contextual influences - both theo­ cal clergy ar logical and cultural - that underlie the organization of the Episcopal This would Church today in light of the realities now facing the church. Anglicanism clergy that has historically cherished a balance between continuity and discontinuity, The roots� universality and locality: that is, carrying forward core values and tradi­ The P, tions from the past while still allowing flexibility for local adaptation and Unlike in E responsiveness in light of changing circumstances. It is in this spirit that I will offera preliminary sketch of some principles for reconceiving Episco­ pal polity in an emerging missional era. Establishment and the Legacy of Christendom: Sixteenth- to Eighteenth-Century Roots The Episcopal Church began as the Church of England in colonial Amer­ ica, where it was the established state church in the southern colonies. As such, the basic underlying assumptions of sixteenth- and seventeenth­ century England were transferredacross the Atlantic. These include the in­ tegration of church and state, the division of territory into geographical domains (parishes and dioceses) ruled by monarchical rectors (derived from the Latin rcgcrc, "to rule") and bishops, with the assumption that ev­ eryone was at least nominally Christian. The church was at the center of ♦ 3. "[T]he gospel, which is from the beginning tu the end c:mbo<lied in culturally con­ ditioned forms, calls into question all cultures, including the one in which it was originally embodied." Lesslie Newbigin, Foolis/111c;; to t/1c Greeks: Tl1c c;ospcl a11d W,·stel'll C11/t11rc ((;rnnd Rapids: Eerdm,ms, 1y86), 4. 134 A Marc True "Do111cstic ,wd Foreign Missio11wy Society" tdied in local society, which was reflectedin the taxation that funded its activities and by the norms the commissary, or deputy, who oversaw the church at the behest of the 4 er quutation bishop of London, under whose charge the colonial English churches by. h's changing The classic Anglican compromise of uniformity (the required use of the Book of Common Prayer, for instance) and flexibility (a diversity of pi­ ts three ma­ eties and theological commitments) came alive as Anglicanism began to r the English take f esh forms on American soil. Since there were no Anglican bishops in democr,1ey; America until Samuel Seabury was consecrated in 1784, a lay governance first-century system evolved in the colonies that differed significantly from England. In ·c1lly, calling Virginia and other Southern colonies, vestries comprised of prominent lay din its pol- people (usually the landed gentry) exercised much greater control owr lo­ both theo- cal clergy and the affairsof the church than had been known in England.5 e Episcopal This would lead to an important modification of the monarchical rule by f'-\nglicanism clergy that was more typical of the church in England and New England. i sco n tin uity, The roots for a more collaborative, lay-involved polity had been laid. s ,md tradi­ The parish system took root only tenuously in the United States." pt<ltion and Unlike in England, where residents of a particular parish were expected to spirit that I attend church of that parish, the American preference for freedom of ving Episco- choice eventually led to looser practices of domain. This was particularly true in those colonies where the Anglican church was not established, for example, in New England. The trajectory of American religious life was he,1ded increasingly in a voluntary direction, shaped in part by the settling of the continent by people who had resisted England's expectations of reli­ gious conformity. Nonetheless, the parish concept remains deeply influen­ tial in Episcopal polity to this day, even though it has never functioned onial Amer­ wry effectively. cnlonies. As even teen th­ l ude the in­ The Late-Eightee11th-Cent11ry Democratic Symhesis eographical rs ( derived At the time of the American Revolution, the Church of England in the col­ tion that ev­ onies faced a major crisis. Anglicanism was directly and symbolically he center of 4. David Hein and G,1rdiner H. Shattuck, Tl,c Episcop,1/io11s (We,tpnrt, CT: Praegcr Publishers, 20,>4), 16 . .:ulturally con­ 5. Rohert W. Prichard, A History of the l:i,isc,>pc1/ C/111rc/1, rev. ed. (Harrisburg, PA: Wa<.; urig inalJy iVlorehnuse Pub., 1999), 1". '"st,·1·11 Ci1lt11rc 6. Sydn�)' E. Ahlstrnm, A J/l'ligi,111s J-listory ti( tl,c A111,·1 ic,111 l'coplc ( New Hawn: Yale Uniwr,itr Press, 1972), 191-1i1. 135 Dwight Zscheile linked to the imperial power that the revolutionaries sought to overthrow lical or th (prayers for the king were included in the liturgy), and the distinguishing glican theol feature of its polity - bishops - represented exactly the kind of monar­ response to chy that Americans were rejecting in favor of democratic rule. Many An­ introduced glicans, especially in New England, openly sided with the Tories (including This Samuel Seabury). Yet the Revolution also presented a dramatic opportu­ nity to recontextualize Anglicanism in America. The process for revising the polity of the colonial Church of England to serve a disestablished Anglican church in the new United States involved considerable negotiation between the low-church Southern Anglicans and high-church Northerners like Samuel Seabury. Its most notable feature was the integration of historic Anglican norms with the representative de­ mocracy so valued by the revolutionaries. It is probably no coincidence that the crafting of the original Constitution and Canons of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States took place parallel to the develop­ ment of the United States Constitution in Philadelphia.
Recommended publications
  • At Axis of Episcopal Split, an Anti-Gay Nigerian - New York Times
    At Axis of Episcopal Split, an Anti-Gay Nigerian - New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/25/world/africa/25episcopal.html?pag... HOME PAGE MY TIMES TODAY'S PAPER VIDEO MOST POPULAR TIMES TOPICS Get Home Delivery Welcome, sangkancil Member Center Log Out Africa World All NYT WORLD U.S. N.Y. / REGION BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY SCIENCE HEALTH SPORTS OPINION ARTS STYLE TRAVEL JOBS REAL ESTATE AUTOS AFRICA AMERICAS ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE MIDDLE EAST At Axis of Episcopal Split, an Anti-Gay Nigerian More Articles in International » Today's Headlines Daily E-Mail Sign up for a roundup of the day's top stories, sent every morning. See Sample [email protected] Change E-mail Address | Privacy Policy Chris Greenberg/Associated Press Virginia church representatives at a Dec. 17 meeting on their split from the Episcopal Church included Richard Crocker, left, of Truro Church. By LYDIA POLGREEN and LAURIE GOODSTEIN Published: December 25, 2006 E-MAIL MOST POPULAR ABUJA, Nigeria, Dec. 20 — The way he tells the story, the first and PRINT E-MAILED BLOGGED SEARCHED only time Archbishop Peter J. Akinola knowingly shook a gay person’s REPRINTS 1. Frank Rich: Ask Not What J.F.K. Can Do for Obama hand, he sprang backward the moment he realized what he had done. SAVE 2. Paul Krugman: Clinton, Obama, Insurance SHARE Enlarge This Image Archbishop Akinola, the conservative 3. Nicholas D. Kristof: Evangelicals a Liberal Can Love leader of Nigeria’s Anglican Church 4. Maureen Dowd: There Will Be Blood who has emerged at the center of a schism over 5.
    [Show full text]
  • WEEK 1: a Very, Very, Brief History of the Pre-Reformation Christian Church B Y D R
    EVER-REFORMING: A REFORMATION 500 CROSS-GENERATIONAL STUDY WEEK 1: A Very, Very, Brief History of the Pre-Reformation Christian Church B Y D R. MA RK ELLINGSEN ( PROFES SOR OF CHU RCH HISTORY, INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL CENTER ) TOPIC SUMMARY The church grew like wildfire in the 1500 years after Jesus’ death. It quickly changed from being a small Jew- ish sect into the religion of Europe. Although Christianity had originally been a movement of Jews, immediate- ly after gaining a Gentile majority of the membership sometime in the 2nd century, it was still a religion with its heaviest concentration in Israel, the Near East, and North Africa. It was not until the adoption of Christianity by the Roman Emperor Constantine in the 4th century that Christianity began to be associated with Europe and Western culture. (We must never forget how Jewish, Asian, and African our faith is.) Most of the first Christians, much like Jesus, came from lower-class backgrounds. However, their commitment, willingness to suffer for their faith, and care for the poor attracted more and more powerful people within the Roman Empire. This accounted for much of the church’s phenomenal growth. This in turn led the church to gain educated leaders who in the 4th and 5th centuries developed some of our great doctrines: the Trinity, the two natures of Jesus, original sin, and the prioritizing of grace over works. (Liturgical styles of worship, teach- ing about the sacraments, and the determination of what books would and would not be in the Bible had been addressed in previous centuries.) The increasing numbers of Christians among the educated elite meant that Christian theology developed in conversation with the cutting-edge intellectual developments of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Episcopal Church, Now Please
    WLR44-3_HYDEN_3_7_08 3/18/2008 5:03:02 PM WELCOME TO THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, NOW PLEASE LEAVE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT’S APPROVED METHODS OF SETTLING CHURCH PROPERTY DISPUTES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND HOW COURTS ERRONEOUSLY IGNORE THE ROLE OF THE ANGLICAN COMMUNION R. GREGORY HYDEN∗ I. INTRODUCTION It is settled constitutional law that internal church disputes in- volving faith, doctrine, governance, and polity are outside of the pur- view of civil courts.1 The Supreme Court stated that “[t]he law knows no heresy, and is committed to the support of no dogma, the estab- lishment of no sect.”2 When a dispute erupts into schism, however, serious questions arise as to who owns church property and “[t]he state has an obvious and legitimate interest in the peaceful resolution of property disputes, and in providing a civil forum where the owner- ship of church property can be determined conclusively.”3 Thus, the Supreme Court held that, while church property disputes come under the scrutiny of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, civil courts can resolve such conflicts so long as the underlying controversy does not 4 involve determining religious doctrines or ecclesiastical issues. ∗ Sitting for the State of Florida Bar, February 2008; J.D., Florida State University, 2007; B.A., University of South Florida, 2004; Episcopal Student Board Member of the Chapel Cen- ter at the University of South Florida, 2001–2004. The author wishes to thank Professor Gey at the Florida State University for his advice and guidance in the writing of this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Efm Vocabulary
    EfM EDUCATION for MINISTRY ST. FRANCIS-IN-THE-VALLEY EPISCOPAL CHURCH VOCABULARY (Main sources: EFM Years 1-4; Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church; An Episcopal Dictionary of the Church; The American Heritage Dictionary) Aaronic blessing – “The Lord bless you and keep you . “ Abba – Aramaic for “Father”. A more intimate form of the word “Father”, used by Jesus in addressing God in the Lord’s Prayer. (27B) To call God Abba is the sign of trust and love, according to Paul. abbot – The superior of a monastery. accolade – The ceremonial bestowal of knighthood, made akin to a sacrament by the church in the 13th century. aeskesis –An Eastern training of the Christian spirit which creates the state of openness to God and which leaves a rapturous experience of God. aesthetic – ( As used by Kierkegaard in its root meaning) pertaining to feeling, responding to life on the immediate sensual level, seeing pleasure and avoiding pain. (aesthetics) – The study of beauty, ugliness, the sublime. affective domain – That part of the human being that pertains to affection or emotion. agape – The love of God or Christ; also, Christian love. aggiornamento – A term (in Italian meaning “renewal”) and closely associated with Pope John XXIII and Vatican II, it denotes a fresh presentation of the faith, together with a recognition of the wide natural rights of human being and support of freedom of worship and the welfare state. akedia – (Pronounced ah-kay-DEE-ah) Apathy, boredom, listlessness, the inability to train the soul because one no longer cares, usually called “accidie” (AX-i-dee) in English.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on the Government of the Episcopal Church and Its Underlying Theology
    A Primer on the government of The Episcopal Church and its underlying theology offered by the Ecclesiology Committee of the House of Bishops Fall 2013 The following is an introduction to how and why The Episcopal Church came to be, beginning in the United States of America, and how it seeks to continue in “the faith once delivered to the saints” (Jude 3). Rooted in the original expansion of the Christian faith, the Church developed a distinctive character in England, and further adapted that way of being Church for a new context in America after the Revolution. The Episcopal Church has long since grown beyond the borders of the United States, with dioceses in Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador (Central and Litoral), Haiti, Honduras, Micronesia, Puerto Rico, Taiwan, Venezuela and Curacao, and the Virgin Islands, along with a Convocation of churches in six countries in Europe. In all these places, Episcopalians have adapted for their local contexts the special heritage and mission passed down through the centuries in this particular part of the Body of Christ. “Ecclesiology,” the study of the Church in the light of the self-revelation of God in Jesus Christ, is the Church’s thinking and speaking about itself. It involves reflection upon several sources: New Testament images of the Church (of which there are several dozen); the history of the Church in general and that of particular branches within it; various creeds and confessional formulations; the structure of authority; the witness of saints; and the thoughts of theologians. Our understanding of the Church’s identity and purpose invariably intersects with and influences to a large extent how we speak about God, Christ, the Spirit, and ourselves in God’s work of redemption.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States ______THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH in the DIOCESE of SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL., PETITIONERS, V
    No. 17-1136 __________ In the Supreme Court of the United States __________ THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE DIOCESE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. __________ ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ____________________ BRIEF OF THE FALLS CHURCH ANGLICAN AND THE AMERICAN ANGLICAN COUNCIL AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS SCOTT J. WARD* *Counsel of Record Gammon & Grange, P.C. 8280 Greenboro Dr., Suite 140 McLean, VA 22102 (703) 761-5012 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the “neutral principles of law” approach to resolving church property disputes requires courts to recognize a trust on church property even if the alleged trust does not comply with the State’s ordinary trust and property law. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED .................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................. iii INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF AMICI CURIAE.................................................. 1 REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION. 5 I. This Court Should Grant the Petition and Clarify the Application of Jones v. Wolf’s Neutral-Principles Standard to Reduce Church Property Litigation and the Burdens It Imposes on Congregations, Dioceses, and Denominations. ............................................ 5 II. This Court Should Grant The Petition and Clarify That Jones v. Wolf Does Not Require Courts to Enforce Canons That TEC Itself Has Repeatedly Admitted Are Not Legally Cognizable and Have No Civil Law Effect Without Statutory Support. ....................... 12 III. This Court Should Grant Review to Avoid the Serious Establishment Clause Concerns Raised by the Ruling Below. ...................... 20 CONCLUSION ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop Willia.M Taylor and Methodist Mission: a Study in Nineteenth Century Social History
    Methodist History, 27:4 (July 1989) BISHOP WILLIA.M TAYLOR AND METHODIST MISSION: A STUDY IN NINETEENTH CENTURY SOCIAL HISTORY DAVID BUNDY Part I: From Campmeeting Convert to International Evangelist The figure of William Taylor (1821-1902) is a recurring feature of the historiography of mission activity under the aegis of the Methodist Episcopal Church during the last half of the nineteenth century. Taylor was involved in missionary endeavors from 1849 when he was sent to California by Bishop Beverly Waugh until his retirement in 1896. He worked on six continents and was instrumental in the establishment of Methodist churches in Panama, Belize, Peru, Chile, Brazil, Angola, Mozambique, Zaire, and South India. He assisted the Wesleyan Methodists in Australia, South Africa and the Caribbean. During his missionary episcopacy, the struggling Methodist mission in Liberia was strengthened and expanded. Despite his frenetic and often quite successful efforts, relations with the Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church were anything but cordial. Methodist periodicals and Taylor's own publications record the continuous struggles to define and control the methods and results of missionary endeavor. Taylor and the Missionary Society viewed the con­ flict as related to missiology. It will be argued here that the conflict be­ tween Bishop William Taylor and the Methodist Missionary Society was not only a function of mission method and ecclesiological control; it was also related to the socio-religious structures ofTaylor's life and to the socio­ religious transitions within Methodism during the second half ofthe nine­ teenthcentury. Sources and Method The diaries, notebooks and collected correspondence of Bishop Taylor have not, in so far as I have been able to ascertain, survived.l Such cor­ respondence as has been preserved is scattered throughout th<fUnited States.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Christian Theology Parts I–III
    The History of Christian Theology Parts I–III Phillip Cary, Ph.D. PUBLISHED BY: THE TEACHING COMPANY 4840 Westfields Boulevard, Suite 500 Chantilly, Virginia 20151-2299 1-800-TEACH-12 Fax—703-378-3819 www.teach12.com Copyright © The Teaching Company, 2008 Printed in the United States of America This book is in copyright. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of The Teaching Company. Scripture quotations are from Professor Cary’s own translations and from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version ®, Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Phillip Cary, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy, Eastern University Professor Phillip Cary is Director of the Philosophy Program at Eastern University in St. Davids, Pennsylvania, where he is also Scholar-in- Residence at the Templeton Honors College. He earned his B.A. in both English Literature and Philosophy at Washington University in St. Louis, then earned an M.A. in Philosophy and a Ph.D. in both Philosophy and Religious Studies at Yale University. Professor Cary has taught at Yale University, the University of Hartford, the University of Connecticut, and Villanova University. He was an Arthur J. Ennis Post-Doctoral Fellow at Villanova University, where he taught in Villanova’s nationally acclaimed Core Humanities program. At Eastern University, he is a recent winner of the Lindback Award for excellence in undergraduate teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Episcopal Ministry Within the Apostolicity of the Church
    Episcopal Ministry within the Apostolicity of the Church The Lund Statement by the Lutheran World Federation – A Communion of Churches Lund, Sweden, 26 March 2007 I. Introduction 1. For forty years, the Lutheran World Federation has been a partner in international ecumenical dialogues. In these dialogues, the Lutheran participants have sought to witness to the teaching of the gospel as maintained in the Lutheran tradition, and at the same time to learn from representatives of other traditions where the gospel has been taught in different contexts and forms. In several of these dialogues the episcopal ministry has been a topic as the churches involved have explored possibilities of furthering the visible unity of the church. The role of the episcopal ministry in relation to the apostolicity of the church has been a particular issue of investigation. Important agreements have been reached, some of which have led to binding forms of communion.i 2. Although the ecumenical agreements reached have been processed and received in differing ways among the member churches of the LWF, the thorough processes of the different theological dialogues represent a resource also for the common life of the LWF as a Communion of Churches. Among the Lutheran churches there is a common confessional basis, and at the same time a diversity of traditions regarding the episcopal ministry. This situation has called for a process of clarification for the sake of the Lutheran Communion itself.ii The present statement, reached through careful study and deliberation, is formulated as an expression of the commonalities that exist among the Lutheran churches in teaching and practices in the area of episkopé.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaea As Political Orthodoxy: Imperial Christianity Versus Episcopal Polities
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 10 Original Research Nicaea as political orthodoxy: Imperial Christianity versus episcopal polities Authors: Fourth-century Christianity and the Council of Nicaea have continually been read as a 1 Rugare Rukuni Constantinian narrative. The dominancy of imperial Christianity has been a consequent Erna Oliver1 feature of the established narrative regarding the events within early Christianity. There is a Affiliations: case for a revisionist enquiry regarding the influence of the emperor in the formation of 1Department of Christian orthodoxy. The role of bishops and its political characterisation had definitive implications Spirituality, Church History upon Christianity as it would seem. Recent revisions on Constantine by Leithart and Barnes and Missiology, University of South Africa, Pretoria, incited the enquiry. The enquiry was made possible through document analysis; this mainly South Africa took the form of a literature study. The orthodoxy that emerged at Nicaea in 325 CE was reflective of the political–orthodoxy trajectory that Christianity took beyond the 4th century. Corresponding author: Between imperial intervention and clerical polities, one was a definitive dynamic to the then Rugare Rukuni, [email protected] emergent Christianity. The influence of the emperor, which was an apparently definitive feature characterising the era, was compositely relevant as a catalyst in the formation of the Dates: Christianity that emerged during the 4th century. The implication that centuries before the Received: 02 Nov. 2018 Council of Nicaea Christianity had been characterised by significant phases of socio-cultural Accepted: 02 July 2019 Published: 30 Sept. 2019 dynamics relegates the influence of the emperor.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalizing-The-Culture-Wars.Pdf
    Globalizing the Culture Wars U.S. CONSERVATIVES, AFRICAN CHURCHES, & HOMOPHOBIA A publication of Political Research Associate s by Kapya Kaoma Globalizing the Culture Wars U.S. CONSERVATIVES, AFRICAN CHURCHES, & HOMOPHOBIA A publication of Political Research Associate s by Kapya Kaoma Political Research Associates is a progressive think tank devoted to supporting movements that are building a more just and inclusive democratic society. We expose movements, institutions, and ideologies that undermine human rights. PRA seeks to advance progressive thinking and action by providing research- based information, analysis, and referrals. Copyright ©2009 Political Research Associates ISBN #978-0-915987-22-1 Design by Hird Graphic Design Cover Photo : Episcopal priest Martyn Minns (l) embraces the Anglican Primate of Nigeria Peter Akinola who has just officiated at Minns’ investiture in May 2007 as Missionary Bishop of the Convocation of Anglicans in North America (CANA). CANA is a breakaway group of Episcopalians that rejects gay bishops and same-sex unions. Photograph by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images This report was made possible by the generous support of the Arcus Foundation. Political Research Associates 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144 U.S. Conservatives, African Churches, & Homophobia Foreword he African continent has long born the brunt of tives rewrote a statement by Rev. Jerry Kulah of Tproxy war s— both hot and cold —of northern Liberia to serve as “Africa’s” statement to the 2008 powers. As Kapya Kaoma shows in this stunning new United Methodist General Convention. When they exposé, over the past decade Africa has become a key were through, it said that embracing social justice theater in yet another foreign conflict —the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UCC Polity Page 1 of 4 A-47
    UCC Polity Page 1 of 4 A-47 One of Webster's definitions of polity action of the Holy Spirit in the life bishop, elder, deacon and pastor are government. is “a specific form of church govern- of the individual believer, and the instruments through which the The United Church of Christ is on ment.” It is the cloth which binds the activity of the Spirit in the life of the tradition is honored and nurtured its administrative side, Episcopal; on churches together in a denomination church? and through which the Holy Spirit its legislative side, Presbyterian; and and varies in style and design with • How does God speak to us through speaks, moves and leads. Authority on its judicial side, congregational. each denomination. Polity is the one another, and how are we resides in the office. The statement “on its manner in which a denomination prepared to listen? Presbyterian polity is based on administrative side, Episcopal” governs and administers its life and A second theological issue related convictions about the value of recognizes that leaders have been relationships among the individuals, to polity decisions has to do with associations of churches, and church chosen and authorized to act on behalf churches and groups within it. human freedom and sinfulness. Polity councils. This is a representative of the church in certain matters. An questions related to this understanding form of church government in example of this is often seen in the include: which delegates or representatives office of the conference minister. History and • Recognizing the presence of human from local churches gather to Conference ministers are the chief sin, is the individual Christian more discern the mind of Christ.
    [Show full text]