Applying Human Resource Tools to Promote the Effective Management of Project-Based Organizations: a Case Study of Development Agency of Valkeakoski Region, Ltd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Applying Human Resource Tools to Promote the Effective Management of Project-Based Organizations: a Case Study of Development Agency of Valkeakoski Region, Ltd Applying Human Resource Tools to Promote the Effective Management of Project-Based Organizations: A Case Study of Development Agency of Valkeakoski Region, Ltd. Bachelor's thesis International Business Valkeakoski 2.2010 Shiran Xu BACHELOR'S THESIS International Business Valkeakoski Title Applying Human Resource Tools to Promote the Effective Management of Project-Based Organizations: A Case Study of Development Agency of Valkeakoski Region, Ltd. Author Shiran Xu Supervised by Liisa Henttonen Approved on 26.02.2010 Approved by Liisa Henttonen ABSTRACT Valkeakoksi International Business Author Shiran Xu Year 2010 Subject of Bachelor’s thesis Appling Human Resource Tools to promote the effective Management of Project-Based Organizations: A case study of Development Agency of Vakeakoski Region, Ltd. ABSTRACT Development agency of Valkeakoski region, Ltd. is mainly a public con- sulting agency, which is a temporary employment organization, and also defined as project organization. The qualification and life-cycle employ- ment of staff in project-based organization differ from regularly one. Since people play a major role in the project implementation, it is worthy to eva- luate human resource efficiency in the project work, so as to improve ef- fectiveness of project work. The mainly idea of the thesis is to investigate how does human resource and leadership plays a role in a project employment organization. Firstly, objective is to describe the field of a project organization. Secondly, the thesis aims to evaluate the life-cycle employment of the project manager and the team. Furthermore, a questionnaire will be conducted to analyze current situation of the project manager and team within the company. Fi- nally, a strategy on how to improve the development of Vaske from HR point of view will be devised. In this thesis, both theoretical and operational research is used. In the desk research, literature from course books, magazine articles, Intent research are intended to contribute to the work’s philosophy, definition, and con- cept. Special interviews were conducted during the field research, together with a series of questionnaires that aims to use specific case sample to ob- tain better understanding. Implied by the research, it is understand that employed life cycle in project-based organization definitely vary from ordinary organization structure. Project-based organization has two essential elements: project manager and the project team. Project manager, especially plays a vital role in the project implementation. To promote management of project-based organization, it is recommended to self-appraise of three crucial issues, such as to organize effective team- work, to promote communication efficiency, to conduct proper leadership strategy. Keywords project-based organization, project manager, project team, teamwork, communication, network, leadership, human resource Pages 64 pp. + appendices 4 pp. CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background information ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction to commissioning organization ...................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose and objectives of the thesis .................................................................... 3 1.4 The basis of the thesis ......................................................................................... 4 1.5 The research method ........................................................................................... 5 2 PROJECT-BASED ORGANIZATION ...................................................................... 6 2.1 Definition of a project ......................................................................................... 6 2.2 Definition of a project-based organization .......................................................... 6 2.3 Types of project based organizations .................................................................. 6 2.3.1 The matrix project organization .............................................................. 6 2.3.2 A pure project organization ..................................................................... 7 2.3.3 A line project organization ...................................................................... 8 2.3.4 A stuff line project organization .............................................................. 9 2.4 Comparison with conventional organization....................................................... 9 2.4.1 Advantages ............................................................................................ 10 2.4.2 Disadvantages ........................................................................................ 11 2.5 Project manager ................................................................................................. 11 2.5.1 Definition ............................................................................................... 11 2.5.2 Nature role of project manager .............................................................. 11 2.5.3 Required working attitudes and skills ................................................... 12 2.6 Project team ....................................................................................................... 16 2.6.1 Definition ............................................................................................... 16 2.6.2 Life-cycle of teams ................................................................................ 17 2.6.3 Team role ............................................................................................... 20 2.7 Future prospect of project-based organization .................................................. 21 3 LIFE-CYCLE OF THE PROJECT MANAGER AND THE TEAM........................ 21 3.1 Teamwork.......................................................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Team orientation .................................................................................... 21 3.1.2 Effectiveness of teamwork .................................................................... 23 3.1.3 Working culture ..................................................................................... 25 3.2 Communication and networking ....................................................................... 26 3.2.1 Communication system ......................................................................... 26 3.2.2 Communication within the team ........................................................... 27 3.2.3 Meeting as a communication tool in project work ................................ 27 3.3 Leadership ......................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1 Leadership style ..................................................................................... 29 3.3.2 Leading the team ................................................................................... 30 3.3.3 motivation .............................................................................................. 31 3.3.4 Leadership in project work .................................................................... 31 3.3.5 Culture influence on leadership ............................................................. 32 4 ANALYSIS OF VASKE’S ACTUAL SITUATION ................................................ 33 4.1 Project organization structure............................................................................ 33 4.2 Networking ........................................................................................................ 34 4.3 Bureaucracy ....................................................................................................... 36 4.4 case project analysis .......................................................................................... 37 4.4.1 description of case project ..................................................................... 37 4.4.2 Project team ........................................................................................... 37 4.4.3 Productivity of the project team ............................................................ 38 4.4.4 Issues of managing the team .................................................................. 39 4.4.5 Culture implications .............................................................................. 39 4.4.6 Vaske’s organization culture ................................................................. 40 5 QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 40 5.1 Method to research ............................................................................................ 40 5.2 Reliability of the resource and information....................................................... 41 5.3 Questionnaire analysis....................................................................................... 41 6 SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION ................................................................... 59 6.1 Suggestions........................................................................................................ 59 6.2 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 61 APPENDIX 1 Sample of questionnaire feedback Applying Human Resource Tools to Promote the Effectiveness Management of Project-Based Organizations: A
Recommended publications
  • Hanninen Mari.Pdf (798.7Kt)
    KAHVIA JA KOHTAAMISIA kohtaamispaikka Narikka Ammattikorkeakoulututkinnon opinnäytetyö Hämeenlinnan korkeakoulukeskus, sosionomikoulutus kevät, 2019 Mari Hänninen TIIVISTELMÄ Sosionomikoulutus Hämeenlinnan korkeakoulukeskus Tekijä Mari Hänninen Vuosi 2019 Työn nimi Kahvia ja kohtaamisia, kohtaamispaikka Narikka Työn ohjaaja Saija Silvennoinen TIIVISTELMÄ Opinnäytetyön tilaajana toimi Etelä-Pirkanmaan Sosiaalisen kuntoutuksen SoKu-hanke, joka toteutti osana hanketta kohtaamispaikkatoimintaa kol- mella paikkakunnalla. Hankkeen kohderymänä oli työelämän ulkopuolella olevat työikäiset ihmiset. Opinnäytetyön tarkoituksena oli selvittää, kuinka kohtaamispaikoissa käyneet ihmiset kokivat kohtaamispaikan vaikutta- neen heidän arkeen, osallisuuteen ja kuntoutumiseen. Tietoperustana olivat sosiaalinen kuntoutus ja sosiaaliohjaus. Lisäksi teori- assa oli sosiaaliseen kuntoutukseen ja kohtaamispaikkatyöhön liittyviä kä- sitteitä kuten monialalainen yhteistyö, työelämän ulkopuolella olevien osallisuus, sote-uudistus ja palveluiden digitalisointi sekä avoimen kohtaa- mispaikan periaatteet. Tutkimus oli kvantitatiivinen kyselytutkimus, joka toteutettiin verkkokyselynä. Kyselyssä oli mukana sekä suljettuja, että avoimia kysymyksiä, joihin vastaaja sai vastata omin sanoin. Avoimiin ky- symyksiin vastaaminen oli vapaaehtoista. Nämä vastaukset analysoitiin teemoittelemalla vastaukset neljään eri teemaan. Tuloksista pystyi päättelemään, että kohtaamispaikka on onnistunut tuo- maan ihmisten elämään sisältöä ja monet ovat onnistuneet saamaan lisää osallisuuden
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae 2/2013 Marja-Liisa Manka (Née Broman)
    1 Curriculum Vitae 2/2013 Marja-Liisa Manka (née Broman) EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Doctor of Philosophy 1999 Major: Education, specialising in Vocational Education University of Tampere Master of Social Sciences 1975 Major: Journalism and Mass Communication Minors: Advanced Studies in Public Administration, Intermediate Studies in Local Governance and Social Policy, Basic Studies in Statistics and Political Science University of Tampere Basic Studies in Economics 1978 University of Oulu Basic Studies in Psychology 1979 University of Oulu WORK EXPERIENCE Programme Director, Professor 1 January 2012 – 31 December 2014 Professor, fixed-term 17 May 2004 – 31 December 2011 University of Tampere, Well-being at work CEO 1 October 2001 – 16 May 2004 part-time starting 17 May 2004 Docendum Oy Director 1998–2001 Edutech, Centre for Professional Development at the Tampere University of Technology 2 Head of Training Division 1990–1998 Saarioinen Oy (also Artekno Oy) Head of Training Division and Planner 1987–1989 University of Tampere, Institute for Extension Studies in Hämeenlinna Journalist 1988 Finnish Broadcasting Company YLE, Hämeenlinna editorial office Head of Information Department 1985–1987 Suomen Kunnallisliitto, Helsinki Planner 1980–1985 National Board of Vocational Education, Helsinki Careers Councellor 1976–1980 Oulu Employment Office, Oulu Occupational Planning Secretary 1975–1976 Municipality of Lempäälä, Lempäälä ACADEMIC EXPERT POSITIONS Report on the scientific qualifications of Erika Sauer, DSc (Econ), under consideration for a docentship in Leadership (and Creative Leadership in particular) with the Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics. 31 March 2012. Report on the research plan submitted to the Finnish Work Environment Fund's call for grant applications in Spring 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFELONG LEARNING PROGRAMME COMENIUS Application Form 2013 for Comenius Regio Partnerships
    COMENIUS PARTNERSHIPS LIFELONG LEARNING PROGRAMME COMENIUS Application form 2013 for Comenius Regio Partnerships PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TABLES REFERRED TO IN CERTAIN FIELDS OF THIS FORM CAN BE FOUND IN THE ANNEX. Programme Lifelong Learning Programme Sub-Programme COMENIUS Call for Proposals LLP Call for Proposals 2013 Action COMENIUS REGIO PARTNERSHIPS Deadline 21.02.2013 National Agency of the coordinating FI1 Finland region Project title EXCHANGING AND DEVELOPMENT OF WORKING PROTOCOLS TO IMPROVE THE USE OF ICT AT SCHOOLS AND THE LOCAL AREA IN OUR TWO REGIONS. Project acronym ICT IN USE Working language of the partnership EN - English Number of participating regions 2 Total number of local partners (both FINLAND : CITY OF AKAA – CITY OF regions) VALKEAKOSKI- 5 SCHOOLS – ICT-Center SPAIN: 1 ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES-5 SCHOOLS-1 PARENTS´ ASSOCIATION-1TEACHER TRAINIG CENTER Name of the applicant institution in AKAAN KAUPUNKI – CITY OF AKAA the coordinating region PIRKANMAA-LÄNSI-SUOMI - FINLAND Name of the applicant institution in MANCOMUNIDAD DE LA SAGRA BAJA the partner region (ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES) TOLEDO-SPAIN COMENIUS PARTNERSHIPS General information Before completing this form, please read the relevant sections in the Lifelong Learning Programme Guide and the 2013 Call for Proposals published by the European Commission. Please consult also the website of your National Agency, which contains additional information on closing dates and National Agency addresses to which the application must be sent. A link to the European Call for Proposals, the Programme Guide and further information such as Frequently Asked Questions can be found on the Lifelong Learning Programme website: http://ec.europa.eu/education/comenius/doc854_en.htm Comenius Regio Partnerships consist of two partner regions, one of which acts as a "coordinator" for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Rural Development Programme Rfor Areas Outside Objective 1 for 2000 - 2006
    Regional Rural Development Programme Rfor areas outside Objective 1 for 2000 - 2006 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Publications 11b/2001 1 Regional Rural Development Programme for areas outside Objective 1 for 2000 - 2006 Unofficial translation K (2000) 2148, final 20.7.2000 K (2002) 170, 31.10.2002 Publisher: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Govern photos: Ritva Salomaa, Antero Aaltonen, Terhi Pohjola ISSN 1238-2531 ISBN 952-453-062-7 Layout: PixPoint ky Printing press: Painopörssi Oy, Helsinki 2002 2 Documentation page Publisher Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Date 2002 Author(s) Title of publication Regional Rural Development Programme for Areas outside Objective 1 for 2000-2006 K(2000) 2148 final Abstract The Regional Rural Development Programme covers the Finnish areas excluded from the Ob- jective 1 Programme, except for Åland, which has a programme of its own. Thus the pro- gramme covers the territories of the Employment and Economic Development Centres of Uusi- maa, Varsinais-Suomi, Satakunta, Häme, Pirkanmaa, South-East Finland and South Ostro- bothnia and parts of the territories of the Central Finland, Central Ostrobothnia and North Ostrobothnia Centres. The Regional Rural Development Programme is based on Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/ 1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guaran- tee Fund (EAGGF) as well as Regulation (EC) No 1750/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. The amendments to the programme document of the Regional Rural Development Programme approved by the European Commission have been included in this publication (K(2002)170; CCI 1999 FIGPD002).
    [Show full text]