No Canadian Border Reopening This Summer by Steven D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No Canadian Border Reopening This Summer by Steven D The National Livestock Weekly August 23, 2004 • Vol. 83, No. 45 “The Industry’s Largest Weekly Circulation” www.wlj.net • E-mail: [email protected][email protected][email protected] A Crow Publication No Canadian border reopening this summer By Steven D. Vetter WLJ Editor — Veneman says August out of BSE SurveillanceWeekly totals: June 6 through August 15Testing USDA officials recently indicated final regulations question. governing full resumption of beef and cattle imports from Canada won’t be issued anytime this summer— — Lobbyists say 5,000 and that they are still in the midst of finalizing the rule- delay to last after making process on the issue. election. In addition, beef industry lobbyists told WLJ that any 4,000 expansion of Canadian beef products to be accepted by the U.S. won’t happen until after this November’s See Border page 6 presidential election. The agency initially proposed reopening the border to Canadian beef last year; it has 3,000 been largely closed since the discovery of a BSE-infected cow in Alberta in 2003. But after a BSE-positive cow, of Canadian origin, was found in Washington-state last December, US- DA postponed the proposal and reopened the comment period. 2,000 BSE tests conducted on a weekly basis continue to escalate, According to Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman, her agency is now in the process of and several USDA officials thought the 5,000 test mark could be hit by the end of the month. For the first 11 weeks of the reviewing all comments on the matter, and that the sheer volume of public input will de- agency’s stepped up testing, a total of 37,742 BSE tests had lay any regulatory decision until after the end of August. 1,000 been conducted, with only two inconclusive tests reported. “The amount of comments received were much more numerous than we had originally Corn condition ratings decline; $2 unlikely — Hot growing er kick in and start to progress the Last Tuesday’s crop progress re- On par with usual development, projection, which means a 10.7- weather lacking. maturity of corn plants. While a port, released by USDA’s Nation- 23 percent of the corn crop is dent- 10.75 billion crop is more likely. record setting crop is still expect- al Agriculture Statistics Service ed nationally, while 96 percent is “I just don’t think it can get hot By Steven D. Vetter ed, the most recent forecast of 10.93 (NASS), showed 73 percent of U.S. silking, and 57 percent has reached enough for an extended enough pe- WLJ Editor billion bushels is said to be a little corn in good or excellent condition, dough stage. On the last two cate- riod of time to spur corn plants There is some uncertainty start- overstated. compared to 76 percent the previ- gories, this year’s crop is just a few back to their maximum produc- ing to surround the 2004 corn crop As a result, corn prices aren’t ex- ous report. Last week’s figure was points off the five-year average tion, particularly in the western as some major producing areas pected to drop to the $2 level like still 13 percent higher than the fig- pace. In the eastern Corn Belt, corn half of the Midwest and eastern have yet to see hot growing weath- some earlier projections indicated. ure for the same time last year. development is ahead by 13 points part of the northern Plains,” said Several agronomists and corn in Illinois, 10 points in Indiana, John Backenfield, crop analyst with market specialists said that while and five points in Ohio. In Iowa, moisture has been abundant and corn development is now behind Springfield, MO, based AgriAnalyt- worthwhile, it hasn’t been accom- schedule. Corn development in the ics, Inc. “It’s not out of the realm of Prairie dog removed panied by hot temperatures, and Dakotas has also fallen well be- possibility but it’s highly unlikely, that has led to corn being a little hind the usual pace. particularly with weather forecasts from ESA candidate list more waterlogged than normal and All other states are said to be indicating unseasonable wet condi- taking away from some of the qual- steady with normal corn develop- tion through most of this month.” By Sarah L. Swenson ity attributes. ment. Even if 2004 production turns WLJ Associate Editor However, the lack of intense heat Several market analysts said last out to be 10.7 billion bushels, that The U.S. Fish and Wildlife hasn’t resulted in any slowdown week’s report could result in 150- will be almost 600 million more Service (FWS) has officially in the development of the nation- 200 million bushels being taken off than last year’s record haul. As a decided that the black-tailed al corn crop, statistically speaking. of this month’s USDAcorn harvest See Corn on page 20 prairie dog no longer needs to be a candidate for listing un- der the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The decision, Fed cattle gain on Labor Day passed down by Secretary of rally Interior Gale Norton August 12, is a major victory for both private Cattle markets were much but August futures fell $1.70 Thurs- adding inventory to the front end landowners and states since it restores state jurisdiction for man- stronger last week, fed cattle trade day, and softened their resolve, and supply. aging the prairie dog. was up $2, and feeder cattle trad- the northern dressed trade was be- The August 1 Cattle-on-Feed re- FWS cited an updated evaluation of the “best available scientific ed $3-5 higher on good demand for tween $137-138. Trade volume for port, out last Friday, was expected information” as a reason for removing the prairie dogs. This new sci- both calves and yearlings. the week was moderate. to show placements down 13 per- ence came in the form of prairie dog population surveys FWS con- Most live fed cattle trade was be- Andy Gottschalk at Hed- cent, marketings down 15 percent, ducted across several states. FWS reported that the surveying tech- tween $86-87, $2 stronger than the gersedge.com said that they expect and cattle-on-feed 2.5 percent high- niques they used have greatly improved since the species was first prior week. There has been good La- to see the market soften into mid- er than last year. determined to be a candidate for listing in 2000. bor Day demand from retailers September. The fact is we’re not Gottschalk said that even though These recent surveys have proved that disease impact, chemical which has driven boxed beef values killing enough cattle, which will supply is becoming a problem, he control, recreational shooting, as well as other factors are not sub- nearly $5 higher over last week. is also concerned about consumer stantial enough to put prairie dog populations at risk. FWS also re- again put some pressure on the fed However, the Labor Day market market. This next Cattle-on-Feed demand which he says is leveling ported, based on their surveys, that black-tailed prairie dogs are more is for the most part over and retail- off from a strong growth trend. In able to persist over time from the ongoing impact. report will show that the supply of ers will again be cautious of the fed cattle on feed for more than120 the larger economic perspective, “With new information regarding the range-wide impact of disease, beef market which has had a hard higher energy values are starting chemical control, and other lesser factors, and recent state estimates days will be 40 percent over a year time staying above the $140 level. to have an effect on consumer beef of occupied black-tailed does not meet the Endangered Species Act’s ago. Gottschalk said that the larg- Cattle slaughter for the week purchases. The competing meats definition of ‘threatened’,” said Ralph Morgenweck, director of FWS’ er carcass weights will support the ending August 14th was at 640,000 large front end supply of finished have mounted an aggressive cam- Mountain-Prairie region. paign to get their share of the high FWS’ definition of “threatened” is any species which is likely to head, and for this summer would cattle. Carcass weights are 16 be considered strong. Slaughter protein Atkins diet, so beef pro- become an endangered species within the foreseeable future through- pounds over a year ago and 15 See Markets on page 15 out all or a significant portion of its range. Not only did FWS eval- was expected back up to the pounds over the five year average. uate the threats to the prairie dog, but they also estimated the 630,000 level this week and then ta- Jim Robb at the Livestock Mar- acreage of their habitat. Currently, state agencies estimate there is per off even more for the balance keting Information Center prefers approximately 1,842,000 acres of occupied black-tailed prairie dog of the month as seasonal demand large front end supplies in a differ- habitat across the U.S., as opposed to a projected 676,000 acres in comes into play. The packer mar- ent way. He said that the percent 2000. gin index was at a positive $3.50 per of cattle in the yield grade 4 cate- FWS also said 51,589 acres of prairie dog habitat exists in Mexi- head, the first profit they have seen gory is up 12 percent and has been co and Canada.
Recommended publications
  • Property Assessment Appeal Board Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order
    PROPERTY ASSESSMENT APPEAL BOARD FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER PAAB Docket No. 14-9-0227 Parcel No. 09-11-101-016 Village Square Plaza Limited Partners, Appellant, vs. Bremer County Board of Review Appellee. Introduction On June 2, 2015, the above-captioned appeal came on for hearing before the Iowa Property Assessment Appeal Board. The appeal was conducted under Iowa Code section 441.37A(2)(a-b) and Iowa Administrative Code rules 701-71.21(1) et al. Paul R. Dietsch, Vice President of Noddles Companies, Omaha, Nebraska represented Appellant Village Square Plaza Limited Partners. County Attorney Kasey E. Wadding represented the Bremer County Board of Review. The Appeal Board now having examined the entire record, heard the testimony, and being fully advised, finds: Findings of Fact Village Square Plaza Limited Partners (Village Square) is the owner of commercial property located at 1311 4th Street SW, Waverly, Iowa. According to the property record card, the subject property is an 8.73-acre site improved by a multi- tenant retail building used as a Hy-Vee grocery store and retail strip shopping center. It 1 was built in 1988 and an addition was constructed in 2006. The building has 72,448 square-feet of gross building area including cold storage coolers/freezers and loading docks. The property is also improved by 215,000 square-feet of concrete paving, yard lighting, and fencing. Its January 1, 2014, assessment was $3,999,520, representing $450,950 in land value and $3,548,570 in improvement value. Village Square protested the assessment to the Board of Review on the ground that the property was assessed for more than authorized by law under Iowa Code section 441.37(1)(a)(1)(b).
    [Show full text]
  • Reason for Removal of Companies from Sample
    Schedule D-6 Part 12 Page 1 of 966 Number of Companies Sheet Name Beginning Ending Reason for Removal of Companies from Sample US Screen 2585 2283 Removed all companies incorporated outside of the US Equity Screen 2283 476 Removed all companies with 2007 common equity of less than $100 million, and all companies with missing or negative common equity in Market Screen 476 458 Removed all companies with less than 60 months of market data Dividend Screen 458 298 Removed all companies with no dividend payment in any quarter of any year Trading Screen 298 297 Removed all companies whose 2007 trading volume to shares outstanding percentage was less than 5% Rating Screen 297 238 Removed all companies with non-investment grade rating from S&P, and removed all companies with a Value Line Safety Rank of 4 or 5 Beta Screen 238 91 Removed all companies with Value Line Betas of 1 or more ROE Screen 91 81 Removed those companies whose average 1996-2007 ROE was outside a range of 1 std. deviation from the average Final Set 81 81 DivQtr04-08 data on quarterly dividend payouts MktHistory data on monthly price closes Trading Volume data on 2007 trading volume and shares outstanding S&P Debt Rating data on S&P debt ratings CEQ% data on 2006 and 2007 common equity ratios ROE data on ROE for 1996-2007 ROE Check calculation for ROE Screen Schedule D-6 Part 12 Page 2 of 966 any year 1991 through 2007 Schedule D-6 Part 12 Page 3 of 966 GICS Country of Economic Incorporati Company Name Ticker SymbSector on 1‐800‐FLOWERS.COM FLWS 25 0 3CI COMPLETE COMPLIANCE CORP TCCC 20 0 3D SYSTEMS CORP TDSC 20 0 3M CO MMM 20 0 4KIDS ENTERTAINMENT INC KDE 25 0 800 TRAVEL SYSTEMS INC IFLYQ 25 0 99 CENTS ONLY STORES NDN 25 0 A.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2003 Or [ ] Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from ____________ to ____________ Commission File #0-28382 Inland Real Estate Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Maryland #36-3953261 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) of incorporation or organization) 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 (Address of principal executive office) (Zip code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 630-218-8000 N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b- 2). Yes X No As of May 13, 2003, there were 65,003,297 Shares of Common Stock outstanding. 1 INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION (a Maryland corporation) TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I Page Item 1. Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets 3 Consolidated Statements of Operations 5 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity 7 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 8 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 10 Item 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplying Strategic Thai Investments in the US
    Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 7 I. Investment Database .............................................................................................................11 Trade and Investment Flows into the U.S...........................................................................11 Calculating Thai Investment Flows into the U.S. ................................................................12 Summary of Thai investment in the U.S. ............................................................................13 Recommendations .............................................................................................................14 Limitations ..........................................................................................................................15 II. State-by-State Analysis .........................................................................................................17 Background ........................................................................................................................17 Methodology ......................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Endogenous Sunk Costs and the Geographic Differences in the Market Structures of CPG Categories
    Quant Mark Econ (2011) 9:1–23 DOI 10.1007/s11129-010-9091-y Endogenous sunk costs and the geographic differences in the market structures of CPG categories Bart J. Bronnenberg · Sanjay K. Dhar · Jean-Pierre H. Dubé Received: 4 December 2008 / Accepted: 6 October 2010 / Published online: 4 November 2010 © The Author(s) 2010. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract We describe the industrial market structure of CPG categories. The analysis uses a unique database spanning 31 consumer package goods (CPG) categories, 39 months, and the 50 largest US metropolitan markets. We organize our description of market structure around the notion that firms can improve brand perceptions through advertising investments, as in Sutton’s endogenous sunk cost theory. The richness of our data allow us to go beyond Sutton’s bounds test and to study the underlying forces bounding concentration away from zero. Observed advertising levels escalate in larger US markets. At the same time, the number of advertised brands in an industry appears to be invariant to market size. Therefore, the size-distribution of brands across markets is characterized by bigger (i.e. more heavily advertised) as opposed to more brands in larger markets. Correspondingly, observed concentration levels in advertising-intensive industries are bounded away from zero irrespective of market size. Keywords Market structure · Endogenous sunk costs · Advertising · CPG brand JEL Classification L11 · L66 · M30 · M37 · R12 B. J. Bronnenberg CentER, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands S. K. Dhar · J.-P.H.Dubé(B) University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, USA e-mail: [email protected] 2 B.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Merck-Medco Lifewise Select National Network Participating
    Merck-Medco LifeWise Select National Network Participating Chains* A Giant Quality Markets Giant Eagle Markets A & P Giant Pharmacy R Acme Good Neighbor PlusCare Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Pharmacies Raleys Arbor H Ralphs Arrow Randalls Aurora Pharmacy Haggen Food & Pharmacy Rite Aid Hannaford Food & Drug Riverside Pharmacy B Happy Harry's Discount Drug Rosauers Supermarkets Harris Teeter Pharmacy S Bartell Drug Company Hart Drug Store Basha’s HEB Pharmacy Safeway Bel Air Hi-School Pharmacy Sav-A-Center Bi-Lo Pharmacy Homeland Pharmacy Save Mart Supermarkets Bi-Mart Corporation Horizon Pharmacies Schnuck Markets Big B Hy-Vee Pharmacies Seaway Foodtown Big Bear Shaw's Brooks Pharmacy K Shop n Save Food & Drug Brooks-Maxi Drug Shop-Rite Brookshire Kmart ShopKo Stores Brookshire Brothers Kerr Drug Smiths Food & Drug King Sooper Snyder C Kinney Drugs Star Pharmacy Kroger Stop & Shop Pharmacy Carrs Super 1 City Market L Super D Cost Cutters Super Fresh Costco Pharmacies LaFeria Pharmacy Super G Pharmacy Cub Leader Drug Stores CVS Longs T D M Target Thrifty Jr. Dillon Major Value Pharmacy Network Thrifty White Drug Discount Drug Mart Marc's Tom Thumb Domincks Marsh Drugs TOP Food & Drug Drug Emporium Mays Drug Tops Markets Drug Fair Medic Drug Drug Warehouse Medicap Pharmacy U Drugs for Less Pharmacy Meijer Minyard Food Stores United Pharmacy E USA Drug N Eagle Food Centers V Eckerd Drug Stores NCS HealthCare EPIC Pharmacies Neighborcare Pharmacy VIX Pharmacy Vons F P W Fagen Pharmacy P & C Food Markets Family Fare Pamida Pharmacy Walgreen’s Familymeds Pharmacy Pathmark Pharmacy Wal*Mart Stores Farm Fresh Pharmacies Pavilions Waldbaums Farmer Jack Supermarket Pay Less Supermarkets Wegmans Food Markets Food Emporium Phar-Mor Weis Pharmacy Fred Meyer PharMerica White Drug Fred’s Price Chopper Pharmacy Winn-Dixie Frys Food & Drug ProCare Pharmacies Furrs Pharmacy Publix Super Markets G Q * with 25 or more stores September 5, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankruptcy ($ Millions)
    Bankruptcy ($ millions) Company Date Liab Company Date Liab PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. Apr-01 $25,717 TEXACO (INCL SUBSIDIARIES) Apr-87 $21,603 OLYMPIA & YORK (b) May-92 $19,800 EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE Apr-91 $14,577 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE Jul-91 $13,500 RELIANCE GROUP HOLDINGS, Jun-01 $12,877 FINOVA GROUP, INC. Mar-01 $11,822 CAMPEAU (ALLIED & Jan-90 $9,947 FIRST CAPITAL HOLDINGS May-91 $9,291 HOME HOLDINGS, INC. Jan-98 $9,132 BALDWIN UNITED Sep-83 $9,000 OWENS CORNING Oct-00 $7,375 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES (II) Dec-90 $6,200 LOMAS FINANCIAL (I) Sep-89 $6,127 PENNCORP FINANCIAL Jan-00 $5,595 MACY'S Jan-92 $5,320 MONTGOMERY WARD, LLC Dec-00 $5,067 OLYMPIA & YORK COS. Oct-95 $5,000 COLUMBIA GAS Jul-91 $4,998 LTV (INCL LTV INT'L NV) Jul-86 $4,700 LTV CORP. Dec-00 $4,669 PSINET, INC. May-01 $4,599 WINSTAR COMMUNICATIONS, Apr-01 $4,379 LAIDLAW, INC. Jun-01 $4,377 MONTGOMERY WARD & CO. Jul-97 $4,271 MAXWELL COMMUNICATION Dec-91 $4,100 INTEGRATED HEALTH Feb-00 $4,061 NEXTWAVE PERSONAL Jun-98 $3,773 LOEWEN GROUP, INC. Jun-99 $3,768 ARMSTRONG WORLD Dec-00 $3,485 TWA (I) Jan-92 $3,470 DOW CORNING May-95 $3,450 SOUTHLAND Oct-90 $3,380 PENN CENTRAL Jun-70 $3,300 IRIDIUM LLC/CAPITAL CORP. Aug-99 $3,262 SUNBEAM CORP. Feb-01 $3,202 EASTERN AIRLINES Mar-89 $3,196 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. Jun-00 $3,141 ICH (SOUTHWESTERN LIFE) Oct-95 $3,111 USG CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1: Purchase Point Media Corporation (PPMC)
    Please highlight all source information per the instructions (ALL SOURCE INFORMATION USED WILL NEED TO BE HIGHLIGHTED AND WEBSITE LINKS NEED TO BE PROVIDED TO BE ABLE TO VERIFY EACH SOURCE). Case 1: Purchase Point Media Corporation (PPMC) INTRODUCTION This case is based on actual financial projections developed and provided by a publicly traded firm, Purchase Point Media Corporation (PPMC). Carefully examine the PPMC projections, which are presented in a sequence and format suitable for break-even calculation and analysis. After you calculate the break-even point, use additional, publicly available informa- tion to come to a decision with respect to market potential. The increase in the price per share of PPMC stock suggests that, over time, the market may have reacted to their results and analyses, using a comparable methodology. OBJECTIVES When you complete this case, you’ll be able to • Identify discernable errors, irregularities, and impropri- eties in style and format within publicly reported data • Meet financial statement presentation requirements for a specific “real world” example • Determine whether financial information provided follows generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) or is presented in “good form” • Distinguish between the substance and form of financial statements • Estimate variable and fixed costs for a publicly traded company • Assess publicly disseminated information from publicly traded companies to determine the feasibility of market potential and market penetration • Exercise enhanced critical-thinking skills CASE BACKGROUND Purchase Point Media Corporation (Pink Sheets: PPMC) is what some refer to as a thinly traded “corporate shell.” The firm held patents in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, and Germany for a shopping-cart display device, but was a nonreporting and nonoperating entity.
    [Show full text]
  • Wpsmemberguide (1).Pdf
    The following paragraph applies when your application for insurance is included in your Member Guide. IMPORTANT NOTICE CONCERNING STATEMENTS IN THE APPLICATION FOR YOUR INSURANCE Please read the copy of the application attached to your policy that's contained in this Member Guide. Omissions or misstatements in the application could cause an otherwise valid claim to be denied. Carefully check the application and write to WPS Underwriting Department within 10 days if any information shown on the application is not correct and complete or if any requested medical history has not been included. Our address is: Health Underwriting, WPS Health Insurance, P.O. Box 7898, Madison WI 53707-7898. The application is part of the insurance policy. The insurance coverage was issued on the basis that the answers to all questions and any other material information shown on the application are correct and complete. 12449-051-0604 Please also see the provision called "Copy of Your Individual Policy Application" at the bottom of the second page of this Member Guide and the copy of your application for your insurance that's the last document contained in this Member Guide. P12035001\ISSUE 000000\0381\DBIC450\88\174388 \00004\02\000647418 Welcome to WPS! We're pleased you've chosen WPS to take care of your benefits needs. As one of our valued customers, you can be assured top-notch benefits and service. As you come to know us, you'll find a philosophy of service that lies at the heart of all our operations. Our employees understand the importance of sound coverage and share a keen understanding of our customers' service expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Marketing Review, 1992-93 Sv®«*'
    United Sta Department i Agriculture Food Marketing Economic Research Review, 1992-93 Service , 1^ Agricultural Economic Report Number 678 v, <.■.•: 1 ^^ A %^ tsr-f^i,, 'í^/u,'<-v- ^^m\ ''tó's.j öica>*^-,\o<'*f ft ^ »fíríjvl iiv.. m»»? ktrt ':■ es^ ,t»'#*' ft %e* V® A*rz^/.^Ä lt«?i,p\tt*'** -^09 n iWiji«*«SL *oe* 2?^ fOt«^* tt>. »»• ,^tU\V; tA\*« |S9 Gar^^ .ess' cwov e<otitv-^ >»>>^ Sv®«*' fÄ\* CoW SN*" .C^tH c^^tSV^ c^v sv\^o^ oso^ \V). fe* C^'o^Ç!u \i>^¿^^^^ oxtt^ 3ft9 Vct^' \v>. \>sÇt (i^Ö P^ci*<.^G^ %<l^ *»-< \t»- CVl»«* \to- -\Ö9 »■ '::í»rot ^^, .««ftvtssi^- |\\>- It's Easy to Order Another Copy! Just dial 1-800-999-6779. Toll-free in the United States and Canada. Other areas please call 1-703-834-0125. Ask for Food Marketing Review, 1992-93 (AER-678). The cost is $15.00 per copy. For non-U.S. addresses (includes Canada), add 25 percent. Charge your purchases to your VISA or MasterCard, or we can bill you. Or send a check or purchase order (made payable to ERS-NASS) to: ERS-NASS 341 Victory Drive Herndon, VA 22070 We'll fill your order by first-class nrîail. Tha United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its progmms on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefe, and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program infonnation (braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of Communications at (202) 720-5881 (voice) or (202) 720-7808 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2003 Or [ ] Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from ____________ to ____________ Commission File #0-28382 Inland Real Estate Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Maryland #36-3953261 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) of incorporation or organization) 2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 (Address of principal executive office) (Zip code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 630-218-8000 N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No As of November 5, 2003, there were 65,376,248 Shares of Common Stock outstanding. 1 INLAND REAL ESTATE CORPORATION (a Maryland corporation) TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I - Financial Information Page Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets 3 Consolidated Statements of Operations 5 Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity 7 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 8 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 11 Item 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Pharmacy Network
    Retail Pharmacy Network A well-balanced pharmacy network offers you convenient access and competitive discounts for brand and generic medications. Our national retail pharmacy network includes more than 64,000 chain and independent retail pharmacies, so you’re sure to find one close to home or work. Using Your ID Card When you fill a prescription through a participating pharmacy, show the pharmacy your ID card so they can submit a claim for coverage by your pharmacy benefit plan. When you pick up your prescription, the pharmacy then collects your applicable member contribution as defined by your plan. If you do not present your ID card or you fill a prescription at a non-participating pharmacy, you pay the full retail price for your medication. If the prescription is eligible for coverage under your pharmacy benefit plan, you may submit a claim to request reimbursement (forms are available at www.optumrx.com or by calling customer service). When you submit a claim using the reimbursement form, OptumRx first determines if your plan covers the medication. If it is covered, the amount you receive is based on contracted pharmacy rates less your plan’s out-of-pocket member contribution. All prescription claims are subject to your pharmacy benefit plan’s rules and restrictions. Retail Pharmacy Network Finding a Network Pharmacy You can choose from three easy ways to find participating pharmacies near you: 1. Review the partial list included on the following pages. 2. Go to our website and use the LOCATE A PHARMACY tool. 3. Contact customer service using the number on the back of your benefit plan member ID card.
    [Show full text]