2018 / 19 Report on the Management of the Government’S Portfolio OVERVIEW Who We Are 2018/19 Highlights

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2018 / 19 Report on the Management of the Government’S Portfolio OVERVIEW Who We Are 2018/19 Highlights 2018 / 19 Report on the Management of the Government’s Portfolio OVERVIEW Who We Are 2018/19 Highlights GIC’s mission is to secure Singapore’s financial future. Performance We invest for the long term to preserve and enhance the international purchasing power of the reserves • GIC achieved a 20-year annualised rate of return of 3.4% above global inflation placed under our management. Our work contributes for the financial year ended 31 March 2019. to the well-being of present and future generations • We are prepared for the uncertainty ahead and aim to deliver sustained long-term of Singaporeans. Long-term orientation and value returns on the reserves under our management, for the benefit of Singapore. discipline are at the heart of our investment philosophy. We manage a robust and diversified portfolio to generate steady real returns over a 20-year investment horizon, Appointments so as to fulfil our mission. We consider and integrate all opportunities and risks to deliver long-term value We welcome: through our investment and corporate practices. • Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam as our Deputy Chairman on 1 May 2019. GIC employs over 1,500 people across our 10 offices • Mr Lawrence Wong, who was appointed to the GIC Board on 1 November 2018. worldwide. We are committed to engaging and growing our people. As an institution and as individuals, we are • Mr Seck Wai Kwong, who was appointed to the GIC Board on 9 November 2018. guided by our common values of Prudence, Respect, Integrity, Merit and Excellence to achieve the results we • Mr Chan Chun Sing, who was appointed to the GIC Investment Strategies seek without compromising our reputation. Committee on 1 October 2018. • Mr Carsten Stendevad, who was appointed to our International Advisory Board on 1 October 2018. The year in numbers Annualised rolling Outlook 20-year real rate of return 3.4% • In view of the high valuations, slowing global growth, and significant Over uncertainties, we maintain our cautious portfolio stance. Number of employees • Our diversified portfolio, disciplined investment approach, and flexible 1,500 capabilities leave us well-placed to invest in this challenging environment. Our teams will also continue to search for compelling idiosyncratic opportunities, and stand ready to take advantage of potential dislocations. Report on the Management of the Government’s Portfolio for the Year 2018/19 2 OVERVIEW The GIC Primer Our mission is to preserve and enhance the long-term international purchasing power of the reserves placed under our management. People and talent are central to what we can do. We believe that the results we seek are best achieved through a culture founded on our five PRIME values of Prudence, Respect, Integrity, Merit and Excellence. P R I M E Prudence Respect Integrity Merit Excellence We exercise prudence and All of us are united in Everything we do is founded We recruit and develop We are relentless in our sound judgement and take a common endeavour, on integrity. We expect the our people solely on merit. pursuit of excellence. In a considered approach to regardless of who we are, highest standards of honesty We draw our talent from all that we do, we strive to managing risks as we seek where we work or what we from everyone in GIC, around the world and provide be the best that we can be. to deliver good investment do. We respect people as both in our work and in our challenging and meaningful This demands that we plan returns, always conscious individuals, care for their personal lives. This includes work. We grant recognition and anticipate well, so that of our overriding fiduciary well-being, and welcome abiding by the laws of the and reward based on we will always be in time responsibility. diversity in capability and countries we invest in, and performance and conduct for the future, fully able to background. We do not observing our code of ethics consistent with our PRIME take up the challenges and As an institution and as tolerate behaviour that works in letter and in spirit. values. We develop our people opportunities that come, individuals, we conduct against the interest of our to achieve their potential so pursuing improvements ourselves with good sense Client or of GIC. We must never jeopardise that we may also perform to where they may be found, and and circumspection, even as the trust others have in us our potential. economies where these may we take the best advantage We stress teamwork within and in our reputation for be gained. of our large asset base, and across departments, professionalism. We select business partners global presence, multi- and with our Client and based on their capability. We expect everyone to do asset approach and long- business partners. We expect We believe in long-term their best in every situation. term orientation. everyone to be free, candid relationships built upon high We harness the creativity and and constructive in their levels of performance and imagination of our people comments and suggestions, quality of service. and our business partners for and always seek to help our superior results. colleagues and GIC do better. Report on the Management of the Government’s Portfolio for the Year 2018/19 3 OVERVIEW The GIC Way The GIC Way is a set of principles that defines the way we think and act. It sharpens our focus on our Client, our commitment to our people and future. Client First People – The Key Future Now • When our Client does well, we do well • Do what’s right, not what’s easy • Tomorrow is determined today • Never compromise our PRIME values and • Help GIC make the best decisions – • Build leadership and resources for reputation; not even for better returns speak up if you have a different view the future • Always follow GIC’s investment • Attract exceptional people and develop • Insist on nimble and responsive principles: them to their full potential structures and processes ▸ Pursue intrinsic value and maintain • Embolden innovation and price discipline encourage learning ▸ Practise long-term investing • Reward what matters: contribution; not pedigree, age, gender or nationality ▸ Pick our spots: be focused and leverage our strengths • Excel in what you do; make a difference ▸ Pay attention to risk control • Empower decision-making at every level ▸ Prepare for the future • Work seamlessly across boundaries and hierarchy – OneGIC Report on the Management of the Government’s Portfolio for the Year 2018/19 4 CONTENTS 6 Overview from the 36 Feature Article: Asia’s Growing 61 Our People Chief Executive Officer Importance in the Global Economy 62 One Global Team and Financial Markets 62 High-performing Team and 10 Investment Report 37 A Growing Global Economic and Collaborative Culture Financial Footprint 11 Long-term Investment Performance 63 Developing Our People 39 Will Asia’s Rise Continue? 14 Portfolio Distribution and 64 Key Organizational Movements Intermediate Performance Markers 41 Asia Has Challenges to Overcome Before It Can Deliver Its Full Potential 64 Our Compensation Principles 17 Investing in an Uncertain and Lower Return Environment 42 How Does GIC invest in Asia? 65 Building Confident Communities 42 Conclusion 66 Our Offices 18 Managing the Portfolio 19 Our Portfolio and How We Manage It 43 Governance 20 Building the Portfolio 44 Source and Purpose of Funds 25 Investment Process 44 The President of Singapore 27 Investment Implementation 44 The Government 30 Managing Risks 47 GIC’s Governance Structure 50 Organizational Structure 51 Profiles of Board, Board Committee Members and Advisors 58 Executive Management Report on the Management of the Government’s Portfolio for the Year 2018/19 5 Overview from the Chief Executive Officer Report on the Management of the Government’s Portfolio for the Year 2018/19 Overview The Investment Environment longer-term capital expenditures, which has in and Strategy turn contributed to weak global growth. Should the policy uncertainty lead to a deeper economic While the start of the last fiscal year saw financial slowdown, major markets such as Europe and markets pricing in a “synchronised global Japan would have little policy ammunition to recovery”, we are back in an environment of respond and are therefore likely to experience a “lower for longer”. Financial markets are focused more protracted downturn. Emerging markets on the US Fed’s next move in its monetary policy, on the whole have more policy room to cushion trade tensions between major powers, and against a global slowdown, though economies growing political polarisation. We are observing with larger imbalances and vulnerabilities could high risk asset valuations that mask weak be exceptions. In short, policymakers’ scope to market fundamentals and growing economic counter an inevitable downturn is limited. With uncertainties. The investment landscape today high asset valuations and low interest rates, the continues to point to low and volatile returns in case for investor caution remains strong. the future. Beyond the current cycle, structural tensions Growth forecasts were revised sharply around rising income inequality, populism, downwards last year and markets correspondingly and job displacements by technology are likely sold off. Policymakers across major economies to remain. As policymakers around the world shifted to more accommodative policies, after grapple with these challenges, it is imperative LIM CHOW KIAT which markets once again priced in a “lower for to preserve the system of open and integrated Chief Executive Officer, GIC longer” path for future interest rates, and markets economies that has improved the lives of so many. recovered. While this policy shift is expected to Notwithstanding current trade tensions, Asia GIC’s mission is to preserve and enhance the remove the downside risk of over-tightening, its remains a constellation of dynamic, open international purchasing power of the reserves impact is expected to be limited.
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates Singapore Official Report
    Volume 94 Monday No 21 11 July 2016 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SINGAPORE OFFICIAL REPORT CONTENTS Written Answers to Questions Page 1. Posting of Job Openings in Public Service on National Jobs Bank (Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan) 1 2. Plans for Wider Use of Automated Vehicle Systems in Transport System (Dr Lim Wee Kiak) 1 3. Statistics on Malaysian Cars Entering and Leaving Singapore and Traffic Offences Committed (Mr Low Thia Khiang) 2 4. Erection of Noise Barriers between Chua Chu Kang and Bukit Gombak MRT Stations (Mr Zaqy Mohamad) 2 5. Need for Pram-friendly Buses (Mr Desmond Choo) 3 6. Review of Need for Inspection of New Cars from Third Year Onwards (Mr Ang Hin Kee) 3 7. Number of Female Bus Captains Employed by Public Bus Operators (Mr Melvin Yong Yik Chye) 4 8. Green-Man Plus Scheme at Pedestrian Crossing along Potong Pasir Avenue 1 (Mr Sitoh Yih Pin) 5 9. Determination of COE Quota for Category D Vehicles (Mr Thomas Chua Kee Seng) 5 10. Taxi Stand in Vicinity of Blocks 216 to 222 at Lorong 8 Toa Payoh (Mr Sitoh Yih Pin) 6 11. Cyber Security Measures in Place at Key Installations and Critical Infrastructures (Mr Darryl David) 6 12. Government Expenditure on Advertisements and Sponsored Posts on Online Media Platforms (Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong) 7 13. Regulars, NSmen and NSFs Diagnosed with Mental Health Problems (Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong) 7 14. Involvement of Phone Scam Suspects Arrested Overseas in Phone Scams in Singapore (Mr Gan Thiam Poh) 8 15. Deployment of Auxiliary Police Officers and CCTVs at Liquor Control Zone in Little India (Mr Melvin Yong Yik Chye) 9 16.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Years of National Development in Singapore
    1 GROUND BREAKING 60 Years of National Development in Singapore PROJECT LEADS RESEARCH & EDITING DESIGN Acknowledgements Joanna Tan Alvin Pang Sylvia Sin David Ee Stewart Tan PRINTING This book incorporates contributions Amit Prakash ADVISERS Dominie Press Alvin Chua from MND Family agencies, including: Khoo Teng Chye Pearlwin Koh Lee Kwong Weng Ling Shuyi Michael Koh Nicholas Oh Board of Architects Ong Jie Hui Raynold Toh Building and Construction Authority Michelle Zhu Council for Estate Agencies Housing & Development Board National Parks Board For enquiries, please contact: Professional Engineers Board The Centre for Liveable Cities Urban Redevelopment Authority T +65 6645 9560 E [email protected] Printed on Innotech, an FSC® paper made from 100% virgin pulp. First published in 2019 © 2019 Ministry of National Development Singapore All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Every effort has been made to trace all sources and copyright holders of news articles, figures and information in this book before publication. If any have been inadvertently overlooked, MND will ensure that full credit is given at the earliest opportunity. ISBN 978-981-14-3208-8 (print) ISBN 978-981-14-3209-5 (e-version) Cover image View from the rooftop of the Ministry of National Development building, illustrating various stages in Singapore’s urban development: conserved traditional shophouses (foreground), HDB blocks at Tanjong Pagar Plaza (centre), modern-day public housing development Pinnacle@Duxton (centre back), and commercial buildings (left).
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore
    Institutionalized Leadership: Resilient Hegemonic Party Autocracy in Singapore By Netina Tan PhD Candidate Political Science Department University of British Columbia Paper prepared for presentation at CPSA Conference, 28 May 2009 Ottawa, Ontario Work- in-progress, please do not cite without author’s permission. All comments welcomed, please contact author at [email protected] Abstract In the age of democracy, the resilience of Singapore’s hegemonic party autocracy is puzzling. The People’s Action Party (PAP) has defied the “third wave”, withstood economic crises and ruled uninterrupted for more than five decades. Will the PAP remain a deviant case and survive the passing of its founding leader, Lee Kuan Yew? Building on an emerging scholarship on electoral authoritarianism and the concept of institutionalization, this paper argues that the resilience of hegemonic party autocracy depends more on institutions than coercion, charisma or ideological commitment. Institutionalized parties in electoral autocracies have a greater chance of survival, just like those in electoral democracies. With an institutionalized leadership succession system to ensure self-renewal and elite cohesion, this paper contends that PAP will continue to rule Singapore in the post-Lee era. 2 “All parties must institutionalize to a certain extent in order to survive” Angelo Panebianco (1988, 54) Introduction In the age of democracy, the resilience of Singapore’s hegemonic party regime1 is puzzling (Haas 1999). A small island with less than 4.6 million population, Singapore is the wealthiest non-oil producing country in the world that is not a democracy.2 Despite its affluence and ideal socio- economic prerequisites for democracy, the country has been under the rule of one party, the People’s Action Party (PAP) for the last five decades.
    [Show full text]
  • One Party Dominance Survival: the Case of Singapore and Taiwan
    One Party Dominance Survival: The Case of Singapore and Taiwan DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lan Hu Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor R. William Liddle Professor Jeremy Wallace Professor Marcus Kurtz Copyrighted by Lan Hu 2011 Abstract Can a one-party-dominant authoritarian regime survive in a modernized society? Why is it that some survive while others fail? Singapore and Taiwan provide comparable cases to partially explain this puzzle. Both countries share many similar cultural and developmental backgrounds. One-party dominance in Taiwan failed in the 1980s when Taiwan became modern. But in Singapore, the one-party regime survived the opposition’s challenges in the 1960s and has remained stable since then. There are few comparative studies of these two countries. Through empirical studies of the two cases, I conclude that regime structure, i.e., clientelistic versus professional structure, affects the chances of authoritarian survival after the society becomes modern. This conclusion is derived from a two-country comparative study. Further research is necessary to test if the same conclusion can be applied to other cases. This research contributes to the understanding of one-party-dominant regimes in modernizing societies. ii Dedication Dedicated to the Lord, Jesus Christ. “Counsel and sound judgment are mine; I have insight, I have power. By Me kings reign and rulers issue decrees that are just; by Me princes govern, and nobles—all who rule on earth.” Proverbs 8:14-16 iii Acknowledgments I thank my committee members Professor R.
    [Show full text]
  • Votes and Proceedings of the Thirteenth Parliament of Singapore
    VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH PARLIAMENT OF SINGAPORE Second Session MONDAY, 4 MAY 2020 No. 131 1.30 pm 1 PRESENT: Mr SPEAKER (Mr Tan Chuan-Jin (Marine Parade)). Mr AMRIN AMIN (Sembawang), Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Health. Mr ANG HIN KEE (Ang Mo Kio). Mr ANG WEI NENG (Jurong). Mr BAEY YAM KENG (Tampines), Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Transport and Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth. Miss CHERYL CHAN WEI LING (Fengshan). Mr CHAN CHUN SING (Tanjong Pagar), Minister for Trade and Industry. Mr CHEE HONG TAT (Bishan-Toa Payoh), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Trade and Industry and Ministry of Education. Mr CHEN SHOW MAO (Aljunied). Miss CHENG LI HUI (Tampines). Dr CHIA SHI-LU (Tanjong Pagar). Mr CHARLES CHONG (Punggol East), Deputy Speaker. Mr CHONG KEE HIONG (Bishan-Toa Payoh). Mr DESMOND CHOO (Tampines). Mr DARRYL DAVID (Ang Mo Kio). Mr CHRISTOPHER DE SOUZA (Holland-Bukit Timah). Mr ARASU DURAISAMY (Nominated Member). Mr CEDRIC FOO CHEE KENG (Pioneer). Mr DOUGLAS FOO (Nominated Member). No. 131 4 MAY 2020 2 Ms FOO MEE HAR (West Coast). Ms GRACE FU HAI YIEN (Yuhua), Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and Leader of the House. Mr GAN KIM YONG (Chua Chu Kang), Minister for Health. Mr GOH CHOK TONG (Marine Parade). Assoc Prof DANIEL GOH PEI SIONG (Non-Constituency Member). Mr HENG CHEE HOW (Jalan Besar), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Defence. Mr HENG SWEE KEAT (Tampines), Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance. Mr TERENCE HO WEE SAN (Nominated Member).
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Secretary Meets Singapore Leaders
    HONG KONG ECONOMIC & TRADE OFFICE, SINGAPORE MICA (P) 094/03/2011 NO. 1/2011 ISSUE CHIEF SECRETARY MEETS HIGHLIGHTS INVESTMENT IN SINGAPORE LEADERS FUTURE: 2 2011-12 BUDGET 3RD HK FILM 4 FESTIVAL IN KL Call on Singapore’s Prime Minister, Mr Lee Hsien Loong (right) Call on Singapore’s Senior Minister, Mr Goh Chok Tong (right) he Chief Secretary Mr Henry Tang called on During his stay in Singapore, Mr Tang also visited T Prime Minister Mr Lee Hsien Loong and Senior Mandai Columbarium and the Tuas South Incineration Minister Mr Goh Chok Tong, during a visit to Plant to learn more about Singapore’s policies and Singapore on February 14 and 15. facilities on burial and waste treatment. Mr Tang said both Hong Kong and Singapore “Both Singapore and Hong Kong are densely are small, open economies, and Singapore’s populated cities. Columbarium and waste ENTERTAINMENT experiences provided good reference for Hong management are two areas of great public concern EXPO HONG KONG Kong. that require a proper balance between the provision 5 of facilities and public perception and acceptance,” He said, “With challenges posed by global Mr Tang said. economic changes, the two places have to consolidate and upgrade their traditional pillar Concluding the fruitful visit, Mr Tang was confident industries. We should actively explore new growth that it would help to strengthen bilateral relations, areas and ensure our human resources can cope promote mutual understanding and foster long with our development needs. term co-operation between Singapore and Hong Kong. “Meanwhile, we have to tackle internal social problems arising from changes in economic A NEW STAGE FOR structure and strive to raise our city management levels.” HK’S RENMINBI 7 BUSINESS Mr Tang also exchanged views on bilateral economic and trade co-operation and various issues of mutual interest with Deputy Prime Minister Mr Wong Kan Seng, Minister for Foreign Affairs Mr George Yeo, Minister for Trade and Industry Mr Lim Hng Kiang, Minister for Manpower Mr Gan Kim Yong and Economic Development Board Chairman Mr Leo Yip.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewing the Ranks
    BT Infographics GE2020 Renewing the ranks Roughly one in four of the candidates, or a total of 23, elected into Parliament in the last general election in 2015 has stepped down to make way for new blood in the latest polls. The oldest among these retiring Members of Parliament (MPs) is 79 and the youngest is 43. Here is a full list of those who have retired after the dissolution of Singapore’s 13th Parliament. BY CHUANG PECK MING People’s Action Party Goh Chok Tong, 79, Lee Yi Shyan, 58, Marine Parade GRC East Coast GRC The oldest MP who is retiring, Mr Goh Mr Lee was first elected as MP in 2006. was first elected in 1976. He became He was Minister of State for Trade and Singapore’s second Prime Minister in Industry and Manpower as well as 1990. He handed over the reins to Senior Minister of State for National Lee Hsien Loong in 2004 and was made Development. Senior Minister. He retired from the Cabinet in 2011 but was named Teo Ser Luck, 52, Emeritus Senior Minister and Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC continued serving as an MP. Mr Teo was first elected as MP in 2006. He was also Senior Parliamentary Lim Hng Kiang, 66, Secretary for Community Development, West Coast GRC Youth and Sports, as well as Minister Mr Lim was first elected as MP in 1991. of State at the Manpower and Trade He was made Trade and Industry and Industry ministries. Minister in 2004, after his appointment as National Development Minister in Fatimah Lateef, 54, 1995 and Health Minister in 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by Mr Lim Hng Kiang, Minister for Trade And
    SPEECH BY MR LIM HNG KIANG, MINISTER FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY (TRADE), DURING THE COMMITTEE OF SUPPLY DEBATE UNDER HEAD V (MINISTRY OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY) FRIDAY, 2 MARCH 2018 “Building and deepening linkages to create opportunities” INTRODUCTION 1. Mr Chairman, I thank members for their comments and suggestions. GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH AND SINGAPORE’S ECONOMY 2. Mr Yee Chia Hsing asked about the outlook for the global economy in 2018 and the implications for the Singapore economy. 3. The global economy ended on a firm note in 2017, posting the broadest growth since 2010 according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). 4. We expect global economic growth to pick up slightly in 2018, partly on the back of improved growth prospects in the US due to the recently approved tax reforms. 5. However, as compared to 2017, growth in most of Singapore’s key final demand markets such as the Eurozone, China, Newly Industrialising Economies and ASEAN-5 is projected to moderate or remain unchanged. 6. At the same time, while global macroeconomic risks have receded to some extent since the end of 2017, there remain some downside risks to global growth. a. First, there remain concerns over protectionist actions, which could disrupt global trade and economic growth if they translate into trade barriers. b. Second, the US’ economic recovery is in a relatively mature stage of the cycle. An upside surprise in inflation could lead to a faster-than-expected normalisation of the US monetary policy, with consequent impact on the US and the global economy. 7. Against this backdrop, Singapore’s economic growth is likely to moderate in 2018, but still remain firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Votes and Proceedings of the Thirteenth Parliament of Singapore
    VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH PARLIAMENT OF SINGAPORE Second Session WEDNESDAY, 25 MARCH 2020 No. 127 1.30 pm 1 PRESENT: Mr SPEAKER (Mr Tan Chuan-Jin (Marine Parade)). Mr AMRIN AMIN (Sembawang), Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Health. Mr ANG HIN KEE (Ang Mo Kio). Mr ANG WEI NENG (Jurong). Mr BAEY YAM KENG (Tampines), Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Ministry of Transport and Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth. Miss CHERYL CHAN WEI LING (Fengshan). Mr CHAN CHUN SING (Tanjong Pagar), Minister for Trade and Industry. Mr CHEE HONG TAT (Bishan-Toa Payoh), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Trade and Industry and Ministry of Education. Miss CHENG LI HUI (Tampines). Dr CHIA SHI-LU (Tanjong Pagar). Mr CHONG KEE HIONG (Bishan-Toa Payoh). Mr DESMOND CHOO (Tampines). Mr DARRYL DAVID (Ang Mo Kio). Mr CHRISTOPHER DE SOUZA (Holland-Bukit Timah). Mr ARASU DURAISAMY (Nominated Member). Mr CEDRIC FOO CHEE KENG (Pioneer). Mr DOUGLAS FOO (Nominated Member). Ms FOO MEE HAR (West Coast). No. 127 25 MARCH 2020 2 Ms GRACE FU HAI YIEN (Yuhua), Minister for Culture, Community and Youth and Leader of the House. Mr GAN KIM YONG (Chua Chu Kang), Minister for Health. Mr GAN THIAM POH (Ang Mo Kio). Mr GOH CHOK TONG (Marine Parade). Mr HENG CHEE HOW (Jalan Besar), Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Defence. Mr HENG SWEE KEAT (Tampines), Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance. Mr TERENCE HO WEE SAN (Nominated Member). Ms INDRANEE RAJAH (Tanjong Pagar), Minister, Prime Minister's Office, Second Minister for Finance and Second Minister for Education.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEX a CABINET and OTHER OFFICE HOLDERS (Wef 1 Nov 2010)
    ANNEX A CABINET AND OTHER OFFICE HOLDERS (wef 1 Nov 2010) MINISTRY MINISTER MINISTER OF STATE PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARIES PMO Prime Minister's Office Mr Lee Hsien Loong Mr Heng Chee How (Prime Minister) (Minister of State) Mr Goh Chok Tong@ (Senior Minister) Mr Lee Kuan Yew (Minister Mentor) Prof S Jayakumar #@ (Senior Minister) Mr Wong Kan Seng #@ (Deputy Prime Minister & Coordinating Minister for National Security) Mr Teo Chee Hean *@ (Deputy Prime Minister & Minister for Defence) Mr Lim Boon Heng@ Mr Lim Swee Say Mrs Lim Hwee Hua * (Second Minister for Finance and Second Minister for Transport) FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SECURITY AND DEFENCE Defence Mr Teo Chee Hean * A/P Koo Tsai Kee (Deputy Prime Minister) (Minister of State) Dr Ng Eng Hen * (Second Minister) Foreign Affairs Mr George Yong-Boon Yeo Mr Zainul Abidin Rasheed (Senior Minister of State) Mr Raymond Lim Siang Keat * (Second Minister) Home Affairs Mr K Shanmugam * # A/P Ho Peng Kee * (Senior Minister of State) Mr Masagos Zulkifli *+ (Minister of State) Law Mr K Shanmugam * A/P Ho Peng Kee* (Senior Minister of State) 2 ECONOMICS Trade and Industry Mr Lim Hng Kiang Mr S Iswaran * Mr Sam Tan *+ (Senior Minister of State) (Senior Parliamentary Secretary) Mr Lee Yi Shyan * (Minister of State) Finance Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam Mrs Lim Hwee Hua * (Second Minister) Transport Mr Raymond Lim Siang Keat* Mr Teo Ser Luck * (Senior Parliamentary Secretary) Mrs Lim Hwee Hua * (Second Minister) Manpower Mr Gan Kim Yong Mr Lee Yi Shyan * Mr Hawazi Daipi * (Minister of State) (Senior Parliamentary
    [Show full text]
  • Press R Elease
    PRESS RELEASE EMBARGOED TILL 8PM, 9 JUNE 2011 DPM THARMAN SHANMUGARATNAM TO TAKE OVER AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY & CONTINUING EDUCATION COUNCIL (NPCEC) Some changes to Government representatives in NPCEC as well Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean announced today that he will be handing over the position of Chairman for the National Productivity & Continuing Education Council (NPCEC) to Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam. In line with the new Cabinet line-up, there will also be changes in the Government representatives in the Council. The changes will take effect from 9 June 2011. 2 Since the formation of the NPCEC in April 2010, DPM Teo has led the Council to develop strategies to improve national productivity with the aim to achieve a productivity growth of 2 to 3 per cent per annum over the next 10 years. Of the 12 priority sectors first identified based on their potential for productivity gains, contribution to GDP, as well as employment size, eight1 productivity blueprints have been endorsed. 3 DPM Teo said, “It has been a fruitful start for the Council in its first year. Plans for key sectors have been drawn up which are meaningful to the industry players and workforce in these sectors. The strong economic recovery last year brought with it a cyclical upturn in labour productivity of 10.7%. While we have seen some encouraging stories of productivity successes, what is more important is to stay focused on long-term, sustainable productivity growth through product, system and process innovation, and skills upgrading. We also need to integrate our framework for pre-employment and continuing education.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Re-Appointments to the MAS Board
    Monetary Authority of Singapore 10 Shenton Way MAS Building Singapore 079117 Telephone: (65) 6225-5577 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Re-appointments to the MAS Board of Directors Singapore, 29 May 2020... The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announced the re-appointment of two existing members to the MAS Board of Directors. 2. Mr Lucien Wong, Attorney-General, and Mr Chaly Mah, Chairman of NetLink NBN Management Pte Ltd, will be re-appointed to the MAS Board for a further term of three years, from 1 June 2020 to 31 May 2023. 3. Mr V K Rajah, Senior Counsel and Member of Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Group Practice), will be stepping down from the MAS Board and as a member of the Risk Committee on 31 May 2020. Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Chairman of the MAS Board, said, “Mr Rajah provided valuable insights to the MAS Board over the past five years, and helped shape MAS’ approach on several important regulatory and consumer-related issues. We are deeply appreciative of his contributions.” 4. The members of the MAS Board of Directors are listed in the Annex. ***** For media enquiries, please contact: Denise Gan Deputy Director (Communications) Monetary Authority of Singapore Tel: +65 62299425 Email: [email protected] Monetary Authority of Singapore 10 Shenton Way MAS Building Singapore 079117 Telephone: (65) 6225-5577 Annex Board of Directors of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (with effect from 1 June 2020) Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam (Chairman) Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for Social Policies Mr Lim Hng Kiang (Deputy
    [Show full text]