DOCSLIB.ORG

Los Angeles County Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Los Angeles County Areas Los Angeles County Areas By Region Los Angeles City, unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, Pasadena, Malibu, and Santa Monica have begun phasing in minimum-wage increases over the last couple of years. In addition, employees within the geographic boundaries of the City of Los Angeles who perform at least two hours of work in a week are to accrue extra paid sick leave. Paid sick-leave provisions only apply to work done within the City of Los Angeles, not the entire County of Los Angeles. In addition, employers within the Los Angeles City boundaries are to abide by the new Fair Chance Initiative for Hiring Ordinance (FCIHO) which prohibits Private Employers and City Contractors from inquiring about an applicant’s criminal history until after a conditional offer of employment has been made. However, there are areas within the County of Los Angeles that are considered part of the City of Los Angeles. To help identify the locations impacted by the minimum-wage, paid sick-leave, and fair chance ordinances, please use to information below which is a list of the specific areas affected by the provisions. U Unincorporated; Unaffected by Los Angeles City ordinances, but Los Angeles County minimum wage ordinance applies KEY City Incorporated; unaffected by recent local ordinances; state paid sick leave laws still apply L.A. Affected by all Los Angeles City ordinances Angeles Forest Northeast L.A. Rowland Heights (U) West Adams (L.A.) Angeles Crest (U) Atwater Village (L.A.) San Dimas (City) Westmont (U) Tujungas Canyons (U) Cypress Park (L.A.) San Gabriel (City) Willowbrook (U) Eagle Rock (L.A.) San Marino (City) Southeast Northwest County Sierra Made (City) Glassell Park (L.A.) Montebello (City) Agua Dulce (U) Highland Park (L.A.) South Diamond Bar (U) Castaic (U) South El Monte (City) Artesia (City) Montecito Heights (L.A.) Bell (City) Castaic Canyons (U) Mount Washington (L.A.) South Pasadena (City) Elizabeth Lake (U) South San Gabriel (U) Bell Gardens (City) Green Valley (U) Pomona Valley Temple City (City) Bellflower (City) Hasley Canyon (U) Claremont (City) Valinda (U) Cerritos (City) Lake Hughes (U) La Verne (City) Vincent (U) Commerce (City) Ridge Route (U) Pomona (City) Walnut (City) Compton (City) Cudahy (City) Santa Clarita (City) San Fernando Valley West Covina (City) Santa Susana Mountains (U) West Puente Valley (U) Downey (City) Stevenson Ranch (U) Arleta (L.A.) West San Dimas (U) East Compton (U) Val Verde (U) Burbank (City) Whittier (City) East La Mirada (U) Canoga Park (L.A.) Whittier Narrows (U) Huntington Park (City) Antelope Valley Chatsworth (L.A.) La Mirada (City) Acton (U) Chatsworth Reservoir (L.A.) Santo Monica Mountains Lynwood (City) Lake Los Angeles (U) Encino (L.A.) Agoura Hills (City) Maywood (City) Lancaster (City) Granada Hills (L.A.) Calabasas (City) Norwalk (City) Leona Valley (U) Hansen Dam (L.A.) Hidden Hills (City) Paramount (City) Littlerock (U) Lake Balboa (L.A.) Malibu (City) Pico Rivera (City) Northeast Antelope Valley (U) Lake View Terrace (L.A.) *has own city notice Santa Fe Springs (City) Northwest Antelope Valley (U) Mission Hills (L.A.) Santa Monica Mountains (U) South Gate (City) Palmdale (C) North Hollywood (L.A.) Topanga (U) South Whittier (U) Southeast Antelope Valley (U) Northridge (L.A.) Westlake Village (City) Vernon (City) Sun Village (U) Pacoima (L.A.) South Bay West Compton (U) Panorama City (L.A.) West Whittier-Los Nietos (U) Central L.A. Alondra Park (U) Porter Ranch (L.A.) Verdugos Arlington Heights (L.A.) Reseda (L.A.) Del Aire (U) Beverly Grove (L.A.) San Fernando (City) El Segundo (City) Altadena (U) Carthay (L.A.) Sepulveda Basin (L.A.) Gardena (City) Glendale (City) Chinatown (L.A.) Shadow Hills (L.A.) Hawthorne (City) La Canada Flintridge (City) Downtown (L.A.) Sherman Oaks (L.A.) Hermosa Beach (City) La Crescenta-Montrose (U) East Hollywood (L.A.) Studio City (L.A.) Inglewood (City) Pasadena (City) Echo Park (L.A.) Sun Valley (L.A.) Lawndale (City) *has own city notice Elysian Park (L.A.) Sylmar (L.A.) Lennox (U) Sunland (L.A.) Elysian Valley (L.A.) Tarzana (L.A.) Lomita (City) Tujunga (L.A.) Fairfax (L.A.) Toluca Lake (L.A.) Manhattan Beach (City) Westside Griffith Park (L.A.) Palos Verdes (City) Universal City (U) Bel-Air (L.A.) Hancock Park (L.A.) Valley Glen (L.A.) Playa del Rey (L.A.) Harvard Heights (L.A.) Rancho Palos Verdes (City) Beverly Crest (L.A.) Van Nuys (L.A.) Brentwood (L.A.) Hollywood (L.A.) West Hills (L.A.) Redondo Beach (City) Hollywood Hills (L.A.) Rolling Hills (City) Century City (L.A.) Winnetka (L.A.) Culver City (City) Hollywood Hills West (L.A.) Woodland Hills (L.A.) Rolling Hills Estates (City) Koreatown (L.A.) Torrance (City) Ladera Heights (U) Larchmont (L.A.) San Gabriel Valley Westchester (L.A.) Mar Vista (L.A.) Marina del Rey (U) Los Feliz (L.A.) Alhambra (City) South L.A. Mid-city (L.A.) Arcadia (City) Pacific Palisades (L.A.) Mid-Wilshire (L.A.) Avocado Heights (U) Adams-Normandie (L.A.) Palms (L.A.) Pico-Union (L.A.) Azusa (City) Athens (U) Pico-Robertson (L.A.) Silver Lake (L.A.) Baldwin Park (City) Broadway-Manchester (L.A.) Playa Vista (L.A.) West Hollywood (City) Bradbury (City) Central Alameda (L.A.) Santa Monica (City) Westlake (L.A.) Charter Oak (U) Chesterfield Square (L.A.) *has own city notice Windsor Square (L.A.) Citrus (U) Exposition Park (L.A.) Sawtelle (L.A.) Florence (L.A.) Venice (L.A.) Eastside Covina (City) Diamond Bar (City) Florence-Firestone (U) Veterans Administration (U) Boyle Heights (L.A.) Duarte (City) Gramercy Park (L.A.) West L.A. (L.A.) East Los Angeles (U) East Pasadena (U) Green Meadows (L.A.) Westwood (L.A.) El Sereno (L.A.) East San Gabriel (U) Harvard Park (L.A.) Lincoln Heights (L.A.) El Monte (City) Historic South Central (L.A.) Harbor Glendora (City) Hyde Park (L.A.) Jefferson Park (L.A.) Carson (City) Hacienda Heights (U) Industry (City) Leimert Park (L.A.) Catalina Island (U) Manchester Square (L.A.) Harbor Gateway (L.A.) Irwindale (City) Mayflower Village (U) South Park (L.A.) Lakewood (City) University Park (L.A.) Long Beach (City) Monrovia (City) Monterey Park (City) Vermont Knolls (L.A.) Rancho Dominguez (U) Vermont Square (L.A.) San Pedro (L.A.) North El Monte (U) North Whittier (U) Vermont Vista (L.A.) Signal Hill (City) Vermont-Slauson (L.A.) West Carson (U) Ramona (U) Rosemead (City) View Park-Windsor Hills (U) Wilmington (L.A.) Watts (L.A.) 1-800-273-0307 www.allinoneposters.com AIO 102620 Los Angeles County Areas By Alphabetical Name Los Angeles City, unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County, Pasadena, Malibu, and Santa Monica have begun phasing in minimum-wage increases over the last couple of years. In addition, employees within the geographic boundaries of the City of Los Angeles who perform at least two hours of work in a week are to accrue extra paid sick leave. Paid sick-leave provisions only apply to work done within the City of Los Angeles, not the entire County of Los Angeles. In addition, employers within the Los Angeles City boundaries are to abide by the new Fair Chance Initiative for Hiring Ordinance (FCIHO) which prohibits Private Employers and City Contractors from inquiring about an applicant’s criminal history until after a conditional offer of employment has been made. However, there are areas within the County of Los Angeles that are considered part of the City of Los Angeles. To help identify the locations impacted by the minimum-wage, paid sick-leave, and fair chance ordinances, please use to information below which is a list of the specific areas affected by the provisions. U Unincorporated; Unaffected by Los Angeles City ordinances, but Los Angeles County minimum wage ordinance applies KEY City Incorporated; unaffected by recent local ordinances; state paid sick leave laws still apply L.A. Affected by all Los Angeles City ordinances A El Segundo (City) Los Feliz (L.A.) Sherman Oaks (L.A.) Acton (U) El Sereno (L.A.) Lynwood (City) Sierra Made (City) Adams-Normandie (L.A.) Elizabeth Lake (U) M Signal Hill (City) Elysian Park (L.A.) Silver Lake (L.A.) Agoura Hills (City) Malibu (City) Agua Dulce (U) Elysian Valley (L.A.) South Diamond Bar (U) Encino (L.A.) *has own city notice South El Monte (City) Alhambra (City) Manchester Square (L.A.) Alondra Park (U) Exposition Park (L.A.) South Gate (City) Manhattan Beach (City) South Park (L.A.) Altadena (U) F Mar Vista (L.A.) Angeles Crest (U) South Pasadena (City) Fairfax (L.A.) Marina del Rey (U) South San Gabriel (U) Arcadia (City) Florence (L.A.) Mayflower Village (U) Arleta (L.A.) South Whittier (U) Florence-Firestone (U) Maywood (City) Southeast Antelope Valley (U) Arlington Heights (L.A.) Mid-city (L.A.) Artesia (City) G Stevenson Ranch (U) Mid-Wilshire (L.A.) Studio City (L.A.) Athens (U) Gardena (City) Mission Hills (L.A.) Atwater Village (L.A.) Glassell Park (L.A.) Sun Valley (L.A.) Monrovia (City) Sun Village (U) Avocado Heights (U) Glendale (City) Montebello (City) Azusa (City) Glendora (City) Sunland (L.A.) Montecito Heights (L.A.) Sylmar (L.A.) B Gramercy Park (L.A.) Monterey Park (City) Granada Hills (L.A.) T Baldwin Park (City) Mount Washington (L.A.) Green Meadows (L.A.) Tarzana (L.A.) Bel-Air (L.A.) Green Valley (U) N Bell (City) Temple City (City) Griffith Park (L.A.) North El Monte (U) Toluca Lake (L.A.) Bell Gardens (City) North Hollywood (L.A.) Bellflower (City) H Topanga (U) North Whittier (U) Torrance (City) Beverly Crest (L.A.) Hacienda Heights (U) Northeast Antelope Valley (U) Beverly Grove (L.A.) Hancock Park (L.A.) Tujunga (L.A.) Northridge (L.A.) Tujungas Canyons (U) Boyle Heights (L.A.)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Black, Brown, and Over-Policed in L.A. Schools
    Black, Brown, and Over-Policed in L.A. Schools: Structural Proposals to End the School-to-Prison Pipeline in the Los Angeles Unified School District and to Build a National Movement to Stop the Mass Incarceration of Black and Latino Communities A report by Community Rights Campaign of the Labor/Community Strategy Center October 2013 Black, Brown and Over-Policed in LA Schools Structural Proposals to End the School-to-Prison Pipeline in the Los Angeles Unified School District and to Build a National Movement to Stop the Mass Incarceration of Black and Latino Communities. About the authors The Community Rights Campaign is a project of the The Community Rights Campaign’s grassroots Labor/Community Strategy Center. The Community organizing model is led by Haewon Asfaw, Carlos Rights Campaign’s lead organizers are Manuel “Elmo” Gomez, Carla Gonzalez, and Melissa “Mello” Criollo, Ashley Franklin, and Barbara Lott-Holland. Lemus. We are leading a long-term campaign to challenge While we take sole responsibility for this report and suppressive, pre-prison conditions in Los Angeles any errors it may contain, we want to acknowledge public schools. We believe it is parents, teachers, and all the organizations who are helping to build a students—not police, tickets, and courts—who will lead movement to end the school-to-prison pipeline, many the way to transforming our schools. of whom are named herein. Since our launch in 2007, the Community Rights Thank you to the hundreds of young people, Campaign has built a grassroots civil and human parents, teachers, organizers and leaders who are the rights movement of youth, teachers, parents, and Community Rights Campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Bisexual/Pansexual/Fluid Community Needs Assessment of Greater Los Angeles
    The 2014 Bisexual/Pansexual/Fluid Community Needs Assessment of Greater Los Angeles Publisher: Los Angeles Bi Task Force Los Angeles, California Principle Investigator: Mimi Hoang, Ph.D., www.drmimihoang.com Published By: Los Angeles Bi Task Force, Los Angeles, California, March 2015 Special Thanks To: Cadyn Cathers, M.A. Royanna Lecuyer-Mangel, M.A. Lori Way, M.A. Tara Avery Yazmin Monet Watkins Anais Plasketes, M.A. Robert Ozn Curt Duffy William Burleson Lauren Beach Dr. Herukhuti Kathleen Sullivan, Ph.D. Ian lawrence Mike Szymanski Eunice Gonzalez ____________________________________________________________________________ LABTF is a non-profit that promotes education, advocacy, and cultural enrichment for the bisexual, pansexual, and fluid communities in Greater LA. 1 Table of Contents Introduction........................................................................................................ ........................... 3 History of Greater Los Angeles Bisexual Communities............................................................... .. 3 Goal of This Assessment............................................................................................................. 4 Methods……................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary of Findings.................................................................................................................... 5 Demographics ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources July 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTOR 1 INTRODUCTION 1 THEME: WILMINGTON, 1862-1909 4 THEME: SAN PEDRO, 1882-1909 30 THEME: HOLLYWOOD, 1887-1910 56 THEME: SAWTELLE, 1896-1918 82 THEME: EAGLE ROCK, 1886-1923 108 THEME: HYDE PARK, 1887-1923 135 THEME: VENICE, 1901-1925 150 THEME: WATTS, 1902-1926 179 THEME: BARNES CITY, 1919-1926 202 THEME: TUJUNGA, 1888-1932 206 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPY 232 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Pre-consolidation Communities of Los Angeles, 1862-1932 PREFACE This historic context is a component of Los Angeles’ citywide historic context statement and provides guidance to field surveyors in identifying and evaluating potential historic resources relating to Pre- Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles. Refer to www.HistoricPlacesLA.org for information on designated resources associated with this context as well as those identified through SurveyLA and other surveys. CONTRIBUTOR Daniel Prosser is a historian and preservation architect. He holds an M.Arch. from Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in history from Northwestern University. Before retiring, Prosser was the Historic Sites Architect for the Kansas State Historical Society. INTRODUCTION The “Pre-Consolidation Communities of Los Angeles” context examines those communities that were at one time independent, self-governing cities. These include (presented here as themes): Wilmington, San Pedro, Hollywood, Sawtelle, Eagle Rock, Hyde Park, Venice, Watts, Barnes City, and Tujunga. This context traces the history of each of these cities (up to the point of consolidation with the City of Los Angeles), identifying important individuals and patterns of settlement and development, and then links the events and individuals to extant historic resources (individual resources and historic districts).
    [Show full text]
  • La Brea and Beyond: the Paleontology of Asphalt-Preserved Biotas
    La Brea and Beyond: The Paleontology of Asphalt-Preserved Biotas Edited by John M. Harris Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series 42 September 15, 2015 Cover Illustration: Pit 91 in 1915 An asphaltic bone mass in Pit 91 was discovered and exposed by the Los Angeles County Museum of History, Science and Art in the summer of 1915. The Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History resumed excavation at this site in 1969. Retrieval of the “microfossils” from the asphaltic matrix has yielded a wealth of insect, mollusk, and plant remains, more than doubling the number of species recovered by earlier excavations. Today, the current excavation site is 900 square feet in extent, yielding fossils that range in age from about 15,000 to about 42,000 radiocarbon years. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Archives, RLB 347. LA BREA AND BEYOND: THE PALEONTOLOGY OF ASPHALT-PRESERVED BIOTAS Edited By John M. Harris NO. 42 SCIENCE SERIES NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Luis M. Chiappe, Vice President for Research and Collections John M. Harris, Committee Chairman Joel W. Martin Gregory Pauly Christine Thacker Xiaoming Wang K. Victoria Brown, Managing Editor Go Online to www.nhm.org/scholarlypublications for open access to volumes of Science Series and Contributions in Science. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Los Angeles, California 90007 ISSN 1-891276-27-1 Published on September 15, 2015 Printed at Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas PREFACE Rancho La Brea was a Mexican land grant Basin during the Late Pleistocene—sagebrush located to the west of El Pueblo de Nuestra scrub dotted with groves of oak and juniper with Sen˜ora la Reina de los A´ ngeles del Rı´ode riparian woodland along the major stream courses Porciu´ncula, now better known as downtown and with chaparral vegetation on the surrounding Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Compare the Parks
    Curating the City: Wilshire Blvd. Lesson 10: Compare the Parks What You Need Grade Level: All Levels to Know: Curriculum Connections: English—Language Arts Kids’ Guide Correlation: Use this lesson in conjunction with pages 8-9 and 21 of the Guide. As your class explores MacArthur Park and Palisades Park, use this collaborative activity to help students reflect on how parks are similar and different and why parks are important in the life of the city. This activity is designed to be a supplement to additional trips along Wilshire Boulevard to see Hancock Park (the site of the La Brea Tar Pits and George C. Page Museum), Lafayette Park, Christine Emerson Reed Park, and Douglas Park. You can easily modify this activity to have students explore and reflect on the parks in your own community. Website Correlation: Go to laconservancy.org/wilshire. Under “Explore Wilshire Blvd.,” use the keyword search to find the pages on MacArthur and Lafayette Parks for photos and background information. You can also select “Community Landscape” under “Property Type” to see the parks along Wilshire, or search to locate photos and more information on Lafayette Park, La Brea Tar Pits, Reed Park, and Douglas Park. Focus Questions: How are MacArthur Park and Palisades Park similar and different? What makes other the parks along Wilshire, such as Hancock Park (the site of the La Brea Tar Pits), Lafayette Park, Reed Park, or Douglas Park special? Why are parks important? What do the parks tells us about how Los Angeles has changed over the years? Expected Learning Students will be able to identify unique characteristics of MacArthur Park, Outcomes: Palisades Park, Hancock Park, Lafayette Park, Reed Park, and Douglas Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Hancock Park Owner User Office Building for Sale
    HANCOCK PARK OWNER USER OFFICE BUILDING FOR SALE 4322 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD | LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA SALE OPPORTUNITY • Approx. 51,468 SF • Ideal For User • Existing short term leases with rental upside • Provides a User the opportunity to grow within building. FEATURES $ ASKING PRICE: $31,000,000.00 HARD TO FIND 51,468 SF USER OPPORTUNITY LOCATED IN THE EXCLUSIVE HANCOCK PARK/PARKMILE EXTENSIVE SOLAR UPGRADES TO PROPERTY, GENERATING AN AVERAGE OF 9,978 KWH PER WEEK CREATIVE BUILD-OUT WITH BALCONIES POSSIBLE 150 PARKING STALLS PRIVATE COURTYARDS PRESTIGOUS WILSHIRE BOULEVARD ADDRESS MULTIPLE FLOORS ALLOWS FOR EXTRA INCOME PROPOSED COURTYARD RENDERING AT GROUND FLOOR AMENITY TERRACE PROPOSED BUILDING LOBBY 4322 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD 5436 626 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 555 GROUND FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 AMENITY TERRACE AUGUST 2019 PH: 213.622.1855 FAX: 213.622.3406 PROPOSED ROOFTOP DECK VIEW AT ROOF TOP AMENITY TERRACE 4322 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD 5436 4322 WILSHIRE 626 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 555 5436 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 626 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 555 LOBBY RENDERING ROOF TOP TERRACE AUGUST 2019 PH: 213.622.1855 FAX: 213.622.3406 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 4322 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD RENDERING AUGUST 2019 PH: 213.622.1855 FAX: 213.622.3406 THIRD FLOOR CREATIVE OFFICE PLAN FULL BUILDING AVAILABLE LOT SIZE: 33,106 SF YEAR BUILT: 1991 FLOOR PLATES CURRENT IN-PLACE INCOME: $79,957.93 STORIES: Three (3) FLOOR Square Feet ZONING: LACR (PKM) 1st Floor Approx. 19,126 SF 2nd Floor Approx. 19,557 SF APN#: 5090-030-007 3rd Floor Approx. 12,785
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptionally Preserved Asphaltic Coprolites Expand the Spatiotemporal Range of a North American Paleoecological Proxy Alexis M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Exceptionally preserved asphaltic coprolites expand the spatiotemporal range of a North American paleoecological proxy Alexis M. Mychajliw1,2,3*, Karin A. Rice1, Laura R. Tewksbury1, John R. Southon4 & Emily L. Lindsey1 As fossilized feces, coprolites represent direct evidence of animal behavior captured in the fossil record. They encapsulate past ecological interactions between a consumer and its prey and, when they contain plant material, can also guide paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Here we describe the frst coprolites from the lagerstätte Rancho La Brea (RLB) in Los Angeles, California, which also represent the frst confrmed coprolites from an asphaltic (“tar pit”) context globally. Combining multiple lines of evidence, including radiocarbon dating, body size reconstructions, stable isotope analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and sediment analyses, we document hundreds of rodent coprolites found in association with plant material, and tentatively assign them to the woodrat genus Neotoma. Neotoma nests (i.e., middens) and their associated coprolites inform paleoclimatic reconstructions for the arid southwestern US but are not typically preserved in coastal areas due to environmental and physiological characteristics. The serendipitous activity of an asphalt seep preserved coprolites and their original cellulosic material for 50,000 years at RLB, yielding a snapshot of coastal California during Marine Isotope Stage 3. This discovery augments the proxies available at an already critical fossil locality and highlights the potential for more comprehensive paleoenvironmental analyses at other asphaltic localities globally. Coprolites are some of the most important ichnofossils that can be recovered from a diversity of taphonomic, ecological, and geologic contexts1. As trace fossils, coprolites represent windows into the evolution of ecological interactions such as predation, herbivory, and parasitism, and can contain paleoecological proxies spanning thou- sands to millions of years in the past2–4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Paleontological Resources Progress Report for the Purple Line Extension, Section One, Los Angeles, California
    2017 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE PURPLE LINE EXTENSION, SECTION ONE, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA Artist’s rendering of the Los Angeles Basin in the vicinity of Metro’s PLE Section 1, as it might have appeared in the late Pleistocene Epoch, with the present-day landscape of Los Angeles superimposed above. 1518 West Taft Avenue Field Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 San Diego • Riverside • Morro Bay • San Francisco Toll free 888-333-3212 Office (714) 974-8300 Federal Certifications 8(a), SDB, EDWOSB State Certifications DBE, WBE, SBE, UDBE 2017 PLE Section 1 Paleontology Progress Report 2017 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES PROGRESS REPORT FOR THE PURPLE LINE EXTENSION, SECTION ONE, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA Authors: Eric Scott MA, Ashley Leger PhD, Kim Scott MS, John M Harris PhD, and Sherri M Gust MS Principal Paleontologist: Sherri M. Gust January 2018 Project Number: 2064 USGS 7.5’ Quadrangles: Hollywood; Beverly Hills Area: four linear miles Key Words: Pleistocene Alluvium, San Pedro Formation, fossils Cogstone ii 2017 PLE Section 1 Paleontology Progress Report TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. V INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF STUDY ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment A
    ATTACHMENT A SUBJECT: JUSTIFICATION FOR NEW BUSINESSSOURCE CENTER SERVICE AREAS REVISED The Los Angeles BusinessSource Center (BSC) program is undergoing a program redesign which includes redefining the target services areas. The BSC program will provide various levels of assistance to eligible, for-profit businesses operating in the City of Los Angeles and residents of the City of Los Angeles aspiring to open their own business. After taking in consideration the City’s poverty rate, existing small businesses, persons in low- and moderate-income households, Opportunity Zones, Promise Zones, and the target areas addressed in the Citywide Economic Development Strategy (CEDS), the ten proposed service areas, sorted with number 1 representing the area identified as having the greatest need, are: Council BSC Service Area Neighborhoods Districts 1. Southeast Los Angeles Florence, South Park, Historic South Central, Central-Alameda 9, 14 2. Watts Watts, Green Meadows, Broadway-Manchester 9, 8, 15 3. East Los Angeles Lincoln Heights, Boyle Heights, El Sereno 1, 14 Pico Union, Westlake, Downtown, Chinatown, Echo Park, 1, 4, 13, 4. Pico Union/Westlake Rampart Village, Koreatown, Harvard Heights 14 West Adams, Jefferson Park, Adams-Normandie, University Park, Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw, Leimert Park, Exposition Park, 5. South Los Angeles Vermont Square, Hyde Park, Chesterfield Square, Harvard 8, 9, 10 Park, Vermont-Slauson, Manchester Square, Vermont Knolls, Gramercy Park, Vermont Vista 6. Harbor Harbor Gateway, Harbor City, Wilmington, San Pedro 15 Sylmar, Mission Hills, North Hills, Panorama City, Arleta, 7. North Valley Pacoima, Lake View Terrace, Hansen Dam, Sun Valley, 6, 7 Shadow Hills, Sunland, Tujunga Hollywood, East Hollywood, Los Felix, Silver Lake, Fairfax, 1 4, 5, 10, 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment SMMC Item 14 June 3, 2013
    Attachment SMMC Item 14 June 3, 2013 Materials prepared by: A. Petrlic 5/28/13 MOUNTAINS RECREATION & CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Los Angeles River Center & Gardens 570 West Avenue Twenty-six, Suite 100 Los Angeles, California 90065 Phone (323) 221-9944 MEMORANDUM TO: The Governing Board FROM: Joseph T. Edmiston, FAICP, Hon. ASLA, Executive Officer DATE: May 1, 2013 SUBJECT: Agenda Item VI (h): Consideration of resolution authorizing submission of an application to the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy for a project planning and design grant for the San Rafael Hills, Verdugo Mountains, and Northeast Los Angeles Openspace, including Arroyo Seco and Verdugo Wash. Staff Recommendation: That the Governing Board adopt the attached resolution authorizing submission of an application to the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy for a project planning and design grant for the San Rafael Hills, Verdugo Mountains, and Northeast Los Angeles Openspace, including Arroyo Seco and Verdugo Wash. Background: The MRCA develops and implements a wide range of projects for the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy including through project planning and design grants. To continue this effort to secure and develop land interests and public recreation resources in the Conservancy’s jurisdiction, staff is seeking authorization to submit a project planning and design grant application to the Conservancy. This proposed grant application is for the project planning and design within the San Rafael Hills, Verdugo Mountains, and Northeast Los Angeles Openspace, including Arroyo Seco and Verdugo Wash. The planning and design efforts within the San Rafael Hills, Verdugo Mountains, and Northeast Los Angeles Openspace, including Arroyo Seco and Verdugo Wash, are crucial in identifying, creating, restoring, and preserving much needed openspace in Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Shape Dimensionality Metrics for Landmark Data
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218289; this version posted January 29, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. F. R. O’Keefe 1 Shape Dimensionality Metrics for Landmark Data 2 3 F. Robin O'Keefe1* 4 5 Marshall University, Biological Sciences, Huntington, WV 6 7 *corresponding author: F. Robin O’Keefe, Professor, Marshall University, College of 8 Science 265, One John Marshall Drive, Hunington, WV 25755. Phone: +1 304 696 2427. 9 Email: [email protected] 10 11 Running Head: Whole Shape Integration Metrics 12 13 Keywords: Dire wolf, Canis dirus, geometric morphometrics, modularity and integration, 14 information entropy, effective rank, effective dispersion, latent dispersion. 15 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218289; this version posted January 29, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. WHOLE SHAPE INTEGRATION METRICS 16 ABSTRACT 17 The primary goal of this paper is to examine and rationalize different integration metrics 18 used in geometric morphometrics, in an attempt to arrive at a common basis for the 19 characterization of phenotypic covariance in landmark data. We begin with a model 20 system; two populations of Pleistocene dire wolves from Rancho La Brea that we 21 examine from a data-analytic perspective to produce candidate models of integration.
    [Show full text]
  • North Glendale Historic Context
    NORTH GLENDALE HISTORIC CONTEXT City of Glendale, California North Glendale Community Plan City of Glendale,CA. i Appendix A: North Glendale Historic Context Adopted November 29, 2011 CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA City Council Laura Friedman, Mayor Rafi Manoukian Ara Najarian Frank Quintero David Weaver Planning Commission Greg Astorian Stephanie Landregan Chang Lee Hank Sheets Erik Yesayan Historic Preservation Commission Michael Morgan Desiree Shier Caroline Tufenkian Lorna Vartanian Arlene Vidor Adopted by City Council on November 29, 2011 by Resolution 11‐230 ii North Glendale Community Plan City of Glendale,CA Appendix A: North Glendale Historic Context Adopted November 29, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction ………………………………………………………….. 1 Chapter 2 North Glendale: Layers of History …………………………. 3 2.1 Land ............................................................. 3 2.2 People ......................................................... 5 2.3 Events .......................................................... 13 2.4 Neighborhoods ............................................. 17 2.4.1 Annexations ................................. 17 2.4.2 Montrose ..................................... 23 2.4.3 Highway Highlands ……………………. 26 2.4.4 Verdugo City ................................ 27 2.4.5 Mountain Oaks ............................ 28 2.4.6 Sparr Heights ............................... 29 2.4.7 Montecito Park ............................ 30 2.4.8 Crescenta Highlands...................... 31 2.4.9 Foothill Boulevard .......................
    [Show full text]