Georgia from Space- an Explanation of the Nasa Landsat 1 Satellite Image Color Mosaic of the State of Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

GEORGIA FROM SPACE- AN EXPLANATION OF THE NASA LANDSAT 1 SATELLITE IMAGE COLOR MOSAIC OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Geologic and Water Resources Division GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 787 Georgia From Space- An Explanation of the NASA Landsat 1 Satellite Image Color Mosaic of the State of Georgia By Sam M. Pickering, Jr., and Michael W. Higgins GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 787 Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Geologic and Water Resources Division 1979 United States Department of the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary Geological Survey H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Pickering, Sam M. Georgia from space. (Geological Survey circular 787) "Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Geologic and Water Resources Division." Bibliography: p. 1. Remote sensing-Georgia. 2. Georgia-Maps. I. Higgins, Michael W., joint author. II. Georgia. Geologic and Water Resources Division. III. Title. IV. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Circular 787. QE75.C5 no. 787 [G70.5.U6] 557.3'08s Free on application to Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey 1200 South Eads Street, Arlington, Va. 22202 PREFACE In its continuing program of monitoring the Nation's natural re­ sources and understanding the land we live on, the U.S. Geological Survey has now published six Landsat satellite color mosaics at scales suitable to show large areas such as entire States. More of these mosaics are planned, and with each new one the techniques and our ability to interpret the features seen on the mosa.ics are improving. We have chosen one mosaic, that of the State of Georgia, as an example of what can be seen and of some of the more general uses of these "pictures" from space. Both this circular and the mosaic were prepared as a joint effort of the U.S. Geological Survey and the Geologic and Water Resources Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources. iii CONTENTS Page Preface------------------------------------------------------------------ iii Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 VVhat is Landsat? -------------------------------------------------------- 1 VVhat do the colors on the Georgia mosaic mean? ---------------------------- 2 How was the mosaic made? ----------------------------------------------- 2 VVhat can be seen on the mosaic? ------------------------------------------ 2 Culture -------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Land use and land cover ---------------------------------------------- 2 Landforms ----------------------------------------------------------- 5 Geology ------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Summary ---------------------------------------------------------------- 21 References cited ---------------------------------------------------------- 21 Other maps and products to aid in understanding the Landsat mosaic ------- Inside of back cover ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Band 5 Landsat mosaic of Georgia ----------------------------- 3 2. Generalized land-cover map of Georgia ------------------------- 4 3. Map showing landform divisions of Georgia -------------------- 6 4. Enlarged Landsat band 7 image of parts of northern Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee ---------------------------- 8 5. Map showing interpretation of figure 4 ------------------------- 9 6. Enlarged Landsat band 7 image, Fall Line -------------------- 10 7. Map showing interpretation of figure 6 ------------------------- 11 8. Enlarged band 7 image, northwestern Georgia ------------------ 12 9. Topographic map of the area of figure 8 ------------------------ 13 10. Block diagram illustrating general relation of ridges and valleys to anticlines and synclines -------------------------------- 14 11. Enlarged Landsat band 5 image, Pelham Escarpment ----------- 15 12. Enlarged Landsat band 7 image, Lake Seminole ---------------- 16 13. Explanation and location map for figure 12 --------------------- 17 14. Enlarged Landsat band 7 image, Okefenokee Swamp ------------ 18 15. Map showing interpretation of figure 14 ----------------------- 19 16. Landsat band 7 and band 5 images, marshes and estuaries ______ 20 v GEORGIA FROM SPACE- An Explanation of the NASA Landsat 1 Satellite Image Color Mosaic of the State o,f Georgia By Sam M. Pickering, Jr.,t and Michael W. Higgins INTRODUCTION our natural resources and their development Just a few years ago the prospect of a single until Landsat provided such an overview. view of an entire State the siz·e of Georgia This circular is keyed directly to the large s·eemed science fiction. With the launching of color mosaic of Georgia. To use the circular, the Landsat 1 (formerly called ERTS 1) sat­ refer to the indi,cated areas on the large mosaic. Addresses for obtaining the large mosaic, a telite into orbit ~around the Earth and the tech­ nological developments that have allowed its more detailed, interpretative space atlas of images to be successfully pieced together into a Georgia, and other maps that are helpful in mosaic, this "science fiction" ha:s become reality. understanding the State are listed inside the The new Landsat color mosaic of Georgia (U.S. back cover of this circular. Geological Survey, 1973-74) is an excellent ex­ ample of what we can now see from space. WHAT IS LANDSAT? Lands,at images and mosaics are valuable to The Lands'ait 1 satellite, launched by the Na­ g·eologists, soil scientists, foresters, ecolo·gists, tional Aeronautics and Space Administration lamd-use planners, mapmakers, and the general July 23, 1972, circles the Earth in an orbit that public. They allow us to see things too large and passes approximately over the North and South too widespread to be seen accurately and inex­ Poles. At an altitude of 570 miles, it orbits over pensively by other techniques. Until the 1600's any point on Earth once every 18 days. The in­ scientists could study only objects that could be struments on Landsat 1 ceased functioning seen with the naked eye. Then, in 1632, the January 6, 1978. While still functioning, instru­ microscope was invented, and a whole new ments aboard the satellite continuously scanned world of microscopic life was revealed. The the land and water beneath in four color bands ability to see dearly the very large features of and ,transmitted the signals back to receiving our Earth has given us similar opportunities. for stations on Earth. Thus Landsat 1 functioned new discoveries about our planet. somewhat like a detailed television broadcast This circular illustrates many of the uses and from space. At the present time (1978) Land­ details of the Georgia Landsat mosaic. It gives sats 2 and 3 are functioning. When the signals examples of how Landsat images can help peo­ reach Earth they are converted into black and ple understand the areas in which they live, white film images. Two of the four multispec­ work, and travel. One of the basic problems tral scanners on a satellite detect infrared radi­ today is keeping pace with the changes we make ation or light (bands 6 and 7). This type of on the face of the Earth. We build, harvest, light is not visible to the human eye, but shows mine, clear, reclaim, impound, and channelize differences in ground moisture and terrain. The without 1an overall view of what we are doing. remaining two scanners detect visible light We never before had a comprehensive look at (green, band 4, and red, band 5) and show pat­ 1 Georgia Department of Natural Resources. terns of vegetation and cultural development. 1 Individual black and white images or combina­ WHAT CAN BE SEEN ON THE MOSAIC? tions of the images in different color bands CULTURE show forests, cities, wetlands, cultivated fields, superhighways, and many other features. Each One of the first things most people want to image transmitted by the satellite covers. an know about a map such as the Geo·rgia mosaic is area of 13,500 square miles. Fourteen images where they live and where some of the places are needed to cover all of Georgia. and features they are familiar with are located. The Landsat mosaic of Georgia (fig. 1) shows many of the towns and ci·ties, reservoirs, and WHAT DO THE COLORS ON THE GEORGIA MOSAIC MEAN? major highways. One of the unusual cultural features is the circular woodland area in South The Georgia mosaic is a color combination of Carolina along the State line. This area sur­ red (band 5) and infrared (band 7) images. rounding the Savannah River Nuclear Plant is These combined images of each scene· were government-owned land that has not been tinted in shades of blue, black, and red to re­ farmed for many years and has. grown up in semble a color-infrared photograph. This meth­ heavy forest. Another prominent man-caused od shows cultural features and vegetation more feature on the mosaic is the white circular area clearly than a single black and white or a in Tennessee near the State line. This is an area natural-color image. Forest and vegetative where the forest was killed many decades ago cover show as red, and cleared land is white or by overcutting and smelter fumes at the Duck­ bluish. The reddest patterns on this mosaic are town-Copper Hill mining district. Although evergreen forest or winter pasture: the hard­ much reclamation work has been done recently, wood trees were leafless and summer crops had the area still shows as 80 square miles of barren been harvested when these late fall or winter
Recommended publications
  • Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama

    Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama

    Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 524-C Interpretation of Cumberland Escarpment and Highland Rim, South-Central Tennessee and Northeast Alabama By JOHN T. HACK SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 524-C Theories of landscape origin are compared using as an example an area of gently dipping rocks that differ in their resistance to erosion UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract___________________________________________ C1 Cumberland Plateau and Highland Rim as a system in Introduction_______________________________________ 1 equilibrium______________________________________ C7 General description of area___________________________ 1 Valleys and coves of the Cumberland Escarpment___ 7 Cumberland Plateau and Highland Rim as dissected and Surficial deposits of the Highland Rim____________ 10 deformed peneplains _____________________ ,... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 Elk River profile_______________________________ 12 Objections to the peneplain theory____________________ 5 Paint Rock Creek profile________________________ 14 Eastern Highland Rim Plateau as a modern peneplain__ 6 Conclusions________________________________________ 14 Equilibrium concept
  • When the Mountain Became the Escarpment.FH11

    When the Mountain Became the Escarpment.FH11

    Looking back... with Alun Hughes WHEN THE MOUNTAIN BECAME THE ESCARPMENT The Niagara Escarpment hasnt always been But Coronelli was not the first to put Niagara known by that name. Early in the 19th century it on the map. That distinction belongs to Father Louis was often referred to as the Mountain, and of course Hennepin, the Recollect priest who was the first it is still called that in Hamilton and Grimsby today. European to describe Niagara Falls from personal We in eastern Niagara have largely forgotten the observation. In his Description de la Louisiane, name, though it survives in the City of Thorolds published in 1683, five years after his visit, he speaks motto Where the Ships Climb the Mountain. of le grand Sault de Niagara, and labels it thus on the accompanying map. This is the form that So when did the name Niagara Escarpment first prevails thereafter, and it is the spelling used for Fort come into use? And what about the areas other de Niagara, established by the French at the mouth Niagara names, like Niagara Falls, Niagara River of the river in 1726. The English followed suit, and Niagara Peninsula? When did these first appear? though on many early maps (e.g. Moll 1715, I dont pretend to have definitive answers there Mitchell 1782) they use the name Great Fall of are too many sources I have not seen but I can Niagara rather than Niagara Falls. suggest some preliminary conclusions. In his Description Hennepin also refers to la The name Niagara is definitely of native origin, belle Riviere de Niagara, so the name Niagara though there is no agreement about its meaning.
  • The Abyssal Giant Pockmarks of the Black Bahama Escarpment: Relations Between Structures, fluids and Carbonate Physiography” by Thibault Cavailhes Et Al

    The Abyssal Giant Pockmarks of the Black Bahama Escarpment: Relations Between Structures, fluids and Carbonate Physiography” by Thibault Cavailhes Et Al

    Solid Earth Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-11-RC2, 2020 SED © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Interactive comment Interactive comment on “The abyssal giant pockmarks of the Black Bahama Escarpment: Relations between structures, fluids and carbonate physiography” by Thibault Cavailhes et al. Charles Paull (Referee) [email protected] Received and published: 10 April 2020 The manuscript describes a series of ∼circular depressions at the base of the Bahama Escarpment. These are curious features and their discovery may ultimately merit pub- lication. However, the manuscript more closely resembles a first draft, rather than a Printer-friendly version polished work. As is, the existing draft is too poorly written to fully follow many of the arguments in detail. Part of may be attributed to the challenge of writing in a second Discussion paper language. I have made some suggestions as to how to begin to sharpen the word- ing, but it is an incomplete effort. There are also a number of science related points C1 (also indicate below) that need to be considered before this could be recommended for publication. SED Why are these depressions called pockmarks from the outset? What is actually ob- served are approximately circular depressions. The term ‘pockmark’ has evolved to Interactive imply that the depression was somehow physically excavated by seepage, not phys- comment ical collapse. Moreover, it is not commonly been used in carbonate settings. The manuscript also refers to other similar depressions that have been previously been called plunge pools. This is yet another mechanism for surface erosion.
  • 1 a Film by Roger J. Kuhns What Was It Like in Door County Wisconsin 425 Million Years Ago? What

    1 a Film by Roger J. Kuhns What Was It Like in Door County Wisconsin 425 Million Years Ago? What

    a film by Roger J. Kuhns www.rogerjameskuhns.com What was it like in Door County Wisconsin 425 million years ago? What has gone on in the geologic and biologic past beneath our feet? What are the changes we’re experiencing now? What might the future hold for our land, water, environment and communities? “Escarpment” is the natural history story of Eastern Wisconsin and the Niagara Escarpment region of the Great Lakes. The film was shot on location along the entire length of the Niagara Escarpment, with a Door County focus. It is a fast-paced fun voyage through billions of years of Eastern Wisconsin geologic and biologic past. The film reconstructs ecosystems that existed when the dolomitic rocks of the Niagara Escarpment were formed, considers if dinosaurs ever walked in what is now Door County, follows the path of glaciers, and many other major events in our rich geologic past. Locations around the world are featured to show what Eastern Wisconsin was like in the past. Animated sequences are used to illustrate parts of the story. The film helps to inform, enlighten, and guide us towards being better stewards of the land, and takes a glimpse of what a sustainable future might look like. In the spirit of Discovery Channel and National Geographic films, geologist and sustainologist Roger Kuhns produced this film for all ages. Kuhns has worked on the Niagara Escarpment and Great Lakes geology and ecology during the course of his career. FILM: Escarpment GENRE: Science / Nature / Travel PRODUCED BY: Roger J. Kuhns RUN TIME: 1 hour 33 minutes PRODUCTION: musicTOears Press CONTACT INFO: [email protected] / 860-910-8525 AVAILABLE AT: www.rogerjameskuhns.com MOVIE TRAILER: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAyRp7VYFWs 1 2017-2018 Reviews from viewers of a film by Roger J.
  • Historic Overview

    Historic Overview

    Updated Reconnaissance Level Survey of Historic Resources Town of Amherst HISTORIC OVERVIEW LOCATION The Town of Amherst lies in northern Erie County, New York. It is bordered by Niagara County to the north, the Erie County towns of Clarence to the east, Cheektowaga to the south, and Tonawanda to the west. The total area of Amherst is approximately 53 square miles. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The natural environmental setting influenced prehistoric and historic settlement patterns in the Town of Amherst. The town lies within the Erie‐Ontario Lake Plain physiographic province, described as a nearly level lowland plain with few prominent topographic features. The area is underlain by Onondaga limestone dating to the Late Devonian period. Later glaciations shaped much of the western New York topography, including that of Amherst. One of the most prominent topographic features in the relatively featureless province is the Onondaga Escarpment, an east‐west trending hard limestone bedrock formation that lies in the southern portion of the Town of Amherst. The Onondaga Escarpment proved resistant to the effects of glacial scouring and it forms the southern boundary of a large basin once occupied by the shallow glacial Lake Tonawanda. Lake Tonawanda eventually receded leaving behind wetlands and deposits of clay and sand throughout much of northern Amherst (Owens et al. 1986:2). The most important drainages in the Town of Amherst are Tonawanda Creek, Ransom Creek, and Ellicott Creek. Tonawanda Creek forms the northern boundary between Amherst and Niagara County. It flows in a western direction and drains much of the eastern and Northern portions of Amherst.
  • Georgia's Mountain Treasure Areas - 2018

    Georgia's Mountain Treasure Areas - 2018

    Georgia's Mountain Treasure Areas - 2018 In previous Mountain Total Name Cluster Treasures Acres County Trails Hidden Creek Armuchee yes 6,429 Gordon None Johns Mountain Armuchee partially 8,451 Walker, Chattooga, Floyd Pinhoti, Keown Falls, Dry Creek Rocky Face Armuchee partially 8,624 Whitfield, Walker Pinhoti Rabun Bald Chattooga Watershed yes 17,814 Rabun Bartram, Three Forks, Pinnacle Ellicott Rock Extension Chattooga Watershed partially 3,969 Rabun None Rock Gorge Chattooga Watershed yes 3,881 Rabun Foothills Three Forks Chattooga Watershed yes 6,075 Rabun Three forks Five Falls Chattooga Watershed yes 7,488 Rabun Water Gauge, Raven Rcok Thrifts Ferry Chattooga Watershed yes 5,976 Rabun Bartram, Chattooga River Big Shoals Chattooga Watershed partially 5,635 Rabun Bartram, Willis Knob Horse Grassy Mountain Cohutta yes 9,746 Murray Windy Gap, Rocky Flats, Milma Creek Mountaintown Cohutta yes 15,604 Gimer, Fannin Benton MacKaye, Pinhoti, Bear Creek Cohutta Extensions Cohutta partially 5,239 Fannin, Murray Benton MacKaye, Pinhoti,South Fork, Horseshoe Bend Emery Creek Cohutta yes 4,277 Murray Emory Creek Buzzard Knob Northern Blue Ridge yes 9,612 Rabun, Towns None Kelly Ridge Northern Blue Ridge yes 10,408 Rabun, Towns AT Patterson Gap Northern Blue Ridge yes 5,591 Rabun None Southern Nantahala Extensions Northern Blue Ridge yes 7,200 Towns, Rabun None Andrews Cove Northern Blue Ridge partially 4,706 White, Towns AT, Andrews Cove, Rocky Mountain Brasstown Extension Northern Blue Ridge partially 5,087 Towns, Union Miller Trek High Shoals
  • 65Th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004

    65Th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004

    65th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004 Weis Earth Science Museum Menasha, Wisconsin The Lake & The Ledge Geological Links between the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Winnebago Joanne Kluessendorf & Donald G. Mikulic Organizers The Lake & The Ledge Geological Links between the Niagara Escarpment and Lake Winnebago 65th Annual Tri-State Geological Field Conference 2-3 October 2004 by Joanne Kluessendorf Weis Earth Science Museum, Menasha and Donald G. Mikulic Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign With contributions by Bruce Brown, Wisconsin Geological & Natural History Survey, Stop 1 Tom Hooyer, Wisconsin Geological & Natural History Survey, Stops 2 & 5 William Mode, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Stops 2 & 5 Maureen Muldoon, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Stop 1 Weis Earth Science Museum University of Wisconsin-Fox Valley Menasha, Wisconsin WELCOME TO THE TH 65 ANNUAL TRI-STATE GEOLOGICAL FIELD CONFERENCE. The Tri-State Geological Field Conference was founded in 1933 as an informal geological field trip for professionals and students in Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin. The first Tri-State examined the LaSalle Anticline in Illinois. Fifty-two geologists from the University of Chicago, University of Iowa, University of Illinois, Northwestern University, University of Wisconsin, Northern Illinois State Teachers College, Western Illinois Teachers College, and the Illinois State Geological Survey attended that trip (Anderson, 1980). The 1934 field conference was hosted by the University of Wisconsin and the 1935 by the University of Iowa, establishing the rotation between the three states. The 1947 Tri-State visited quarries at Hamilton Mound and High Cliff, two of the stops on this year’s field trip.
  • Unsuuseuracsbe

    Unsuuseuracsbe

    StRd Opelika 85 Junction City HARRIS StRte 96 Geneva StRte 90 96 37 s te e 1 ran TALBOT tR t te S tR e y S V w DISTRICT e 96 Fort Valley 2 Montrose k t 1 S P tR te 96 1 S StR (M TWIGGS e t on Rd iami Valley Rd t R Mac ) R 6 t 2 d Reynolds e 9 S Dublin 9 8 StRt StRte 80 96 StRte 96 Smiths 80 8 PEACH LEE 2 lt Butler 9 S 1 A tR 4 319 7 e t t e StRte 112 2 e MACON t Dudley y DISTRICT 2 R Armour Rd w TAYLOR t R (EmRd 200) SH t StRte 278 Bibb U 4 7 S TAYLOR S 16 0 3 City Upatoi Cr 1 129 11 e t R S t t S 109th Congress of the United StatesR StRte 112 t 32nd (EmRd 200) e MUSCOGEE 3 Phenix G St Reese Rd 6 3 o 2 2 8 Edgewood Rd l 1 e City Forest Rd d 1 Rt e t COLUMBUS 127 e S n t StRte R I t Steam Mill Rd s S Wickham Dr l e Columbus Marshallville 341 s StR te H S w te 2 t R tR Dexter Ladonia Merval Rd 1 te S 1 7 te 127 S y V 185 2 t Rt tRt e 247 ic 2nd Armored Division Rd 7 tR e 127 S t (S o ) S t 0 137 Rte 90) S r Wolf Cr t 57 y 4 d S Perry Rte 2 Upatoi Cr 2 R D tR r e e t t i StRte 41 StRte e 9 StRte n 0 R 23 t n S 126 t S o StRte 6 R StRte 117 R 2 t ( (Airp 1 ) e Rentz o Rd Chester 27 Fort Benning Military Res rt 3 StRte 128 Whitson Rd 4 Cochran 3 22 8 te R TAYLOR Ideal t CHATTAHOOCHEE S MARION StRte 117 StR USHwy 441 Fort Benning te 9 S 0 StRte 26 7 South t Rte 19 129 BLECKLEY 5 Cadwell 13 7 2 7 te 1 RUSSELL StRte 2 StRte 49 HOUSTON tR 1 40 P S e Buena Vista er t StR ry tR te 26 Hwy S S StRt Cusseta tR e 2 te Oglethorpe 6 ( oad 9 26 Montezuma Fire R 00) B u r S n t R t StRte 126 6 B 2 te DISTRICT r S e ) 3 g Hawkinsville t t e R StR 9 r 2 9
  • Late Cretaceous Stratigraphy of Black Mesa, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona H

    Late Cretaceous Stratigraphy of Black Mesa, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona H

    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/9 Late Cretaceous stratigraphy of Black Mesa, Navajo and Hopi Indian Reservations, Arizona H. G. Page and C. A. Repenning, 1958, pp. 115-122 in: Black Mesa Basin (Northeastern Arizona), Anderson, R. Y.; Harshbarger, J. W.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 9th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 205 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1958 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or

    Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or

    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
  • Lake Seminole Hydrilla Action Plan: Development and Implementation

    Lake Seminole Hydrilla Action Plan: Development and Implementation

    LAKE SEMINOLE HYDRILLA ACTION PLAN: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION Michael J. Eubanks' and Donald M. Morgan' AUTHORS: 'U.S. Army Corps of Eneineers, Mobile District, P.O. Box 2288. Mobile, AL 36628-0001; and 2U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Lake Seminole, P.O. Box 96, Chattahoochee, FL 32324. REFERENCE: Proceedings of the 2001 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held March 26-27, 2001, at, the University of Georgia. Kathryn J. Hatcher, editor, Institute of Ecology.. the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. Abstract. This paper describes an effort by the U.S. a decrease in adjacent property values. Hydrilla, the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to manage the current major problem plant, was discovered on the invasive aquatic plant Hydrilla verticillata (hydrilla). lake in 1967. Based on a 1997 survey, this non-native This plant causes serious water resource problems such plant dominates the submersed plant community, which as adverse impacts to small boat navigation, water covers approximately 13,400 acres (40% lakewide), of quality, fish and wildlife habitat, water-borne the lake. Total aquatic plant coverage on the lake was recreation, and hydropower production. An integrated approximately 55% (with significant arms of the lake management plan, including several traditional under almost 90% coverage). A number of aquatic chemical, biological, and mechanical methods, was plant management techniques have been utilized since developed to address reducing the coverage of hydrilla project construction in 1957, including chemical on the lake and to enhance restoration of mixed native (herbicides), biological, and mechanical. These costly aquatic plant communities. Two of the hydrilla management options have failed to adequately control management tools that are in the process of the growth of hydrilla.
  • Field Operations

    Field Operations

    Field Operations Weekly Report July 9 – July 15 , 2017 This report is a broad sampling of events that have taken place in the past week, but does not include all actions taken by the Law Enforcement Division. Region I- Acworth (Northwest) FLOYD COUNTY On July 12th, Game Wardens Sgt. Mike Barr, Cpl. Ben Cunningham, and Ranger Kalem Burns responded to a report of a fight with a large knife involved at the Rocky Mountain Public Fishing Area (PFA) near the beach. Sgt. Barr made contact with a male who he and his sister had been in an argument. Cpl. Cunningham and Ranger Burns stood by with the other parties. No one would admit they were involved in anything but a verbal dispute. The group was removed from the facility. On July 13th, Sgt. Mike Barr found a collapsed person in the parking lot at Rocky Mountain Public Fishing area near the beach. The 17 year old male was having a seizure. Medical personnel arrived to assist and transported the male to a local hospital. Sgt. Barr talked to the girlfriend who admitted the young man had been involved with synthetic marijuana. On July 14th, Sgt. Mike Barr witnessed a fight between two men on Rocky Mountain PFA near the beach. One person was intoxicated and arrested for under the influence on a PFA. Two other persons were cited for possession of alcohol on Rocky Mountain PFA. Six people total were involved in the incident and removed from the facility. On July 15th, Game Wardens Cpl. Shawn Elmore and Ranger Nolan Callaway patrolled Johns Creek on Johns Mountain Wildlife Management Area (WMA).