DOCSLIB.ORG

With the Right Outreach and the Right Organization, We Can Win Back The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
With the Right Outreach and the Right Organization, We Can Win Back The EARLY-BIRD DISCOUNTS CONSERVATIVEAVAILABLE SUMMIT FOR 2018 WESTERN Principled Ideas from the Centennial Institute Publisher, Dr. Donald W. Sweeting Volume 10, Number 2 • February 2018 Editor, Jeff Hunt THE BATTLE FOR THE FUTURE IS ON honestly. I run into senators here and there, and I look at them OUR COLLEGE CAMPUSES and say, “I am so disappointed. What are you doing all day long?” Who else here worked, knocked on doors, and made Charlie Kirk, WCS17 phone calls so that they would repeal Obamacare? And then I have to sit here and listen to five senators who don’t have the backbone to do what they said they were going do, are you kidding me? For seven years we had to hear, “We’re going to repeal Obamacare, just give us the House.” We gave them the House. Then they said, “We need the Senate,” and we gave them the Senate. Then they said, “We need the White House.” Now they have all three chambers and we’re hearing nothing but excuses. What makes me the sickest is that the people who voted for a full repeal of Obamacare only did it because they knew Obama was going to veto it. They lied to us! They didn’t actually mean Charlie Kirk, speaking at the 2017 Western Conservative Summit. it. So excuse my candid, extemporaneous comments, but I’m just sick and tired of these people going to Washington, saying I come from Chicago, Illinois. I grew up twenty minutes down they’re going to do something, and not doing it. the street from where Hillary Clinton went to high school, thirty minutes down the street from the Barack Obama for I live in America, I don’t live in Washington D.C. My passion America headquarters. every single day is working on college campuses, because I love working with 18, 19, and 20-year-olds who want to hear about So you might say, “What is a guy like you doing starting a history and about freedom. They are persuaded by these values national student activist organization?” I started Turning Point and these arguments. It’s entirely possible for a student to go USA when I was 18 and realized I was a conservative. When to one of the best schools in the country, you are surrounded by people you disagree Stanford, Princeton, Harvard, Yale, and not with, you find what you believe very quickly. With the right hear about a conservative idea for more than In the trenches, you either fight or flee, and ten minutes throughout their four years. boy did I argue with a lot of teachers and outreach and the Think about how sick that is, that you pay students those years. I’m 23 now, and I’ve right organization, $200,000 to get a political science degree, found that my generation can understand and you can’t articulate the other side or the freedom, can embrace those values, and we can win back other perspective. does not have to fall victim to Bernie Sanders-style socialism. I believe, with the the future. Over the last five years, as we’ve taken right outreach and the right organization, Turning Point USA to more and more we can win back the future. campuses, we’ve realized that the Left hates the idea that there are other ideas. Think about that. That is exactly what our organization does every day and we The most intolerant people in the world are those that preach are keeping quite a pace. We hosted the nation’s largest young tolerance. They say they stand for diversity. At UC Berkeley, women’s leadership summit, a young Latino leadership summit, they have thirteen full-time people dedicated to diversity. But and a high school leadership summit. At our chapter-leaders’ their definition of diversity is just racial and ethnic diversity, summit, we announced we are adding thirty new staffers this not the most important type of diversity, which is intellectual year. We do all this because, as you know, college campuses are the new battleground. The Left knows they have lost politically Charlie Kirk is an American activist and the founder and executive director of with older adults. The only ground they still hold is our Turning Point USA, an advocacy group for young conservatives. college campuses, which makes this work the most important Centennial Institute sponsors research, events, and publications to enhance fight today. public understanding of the most important issues facing our state and nation. By proclaiming Truth, we aim to foster faith, family, and freedom, By the way, is anyone else really upset at Congress right now? teach citizenship, and renew the spirit of 1776. I could not be more disappointed. I’m just going to speak diversity and diversity of thought. See, I challenge my liberal counterparts on campus and I say, “If conservative ideas were so bad, wouldn’t you want as many conservative speakers as possible, because they’ll all just fall flat on their face, no one will follow them, and everyone will think that’s stupid, right?” The Left is threatened by our value system. They are threatened because they know, when students are able to hear about free enterprise and the Constitution, things actually end up more 50/50. In fact, they end up more on the center-right. So what the Left has created are what I call “Islands of Totalitarianism” on our college campuses. The greatest threat to Western Civilization is what is going on in our colleges. I cannot overstate the threat of what is going on with the assault on free speech and the absolute silencing of opposition of ideas. Let’s go through a little crash course. I will not dive into hyperbole even though you might think I am Turning Point USA Founder Charlie Kirk brings the crowd to their feet at the 2017 Western making this up. We’re going to talk about four things: micro- Conservative Summit. aggressions, trigger warnings, safe spaces, and free speech zones. can you speak freely. Of course, they have to approve what Let’s talk about micro-aggressions. If you say something to a you’re going to say about any ideas, perspectives, or values. student or teacher that you don’t intend to be offensive but that It’s always enforced unfairly against conservative students and might come across as offensive, that is a micro-aggression. The conservative groups, but Planned Parenthood and the Hillary micro-aggression rules say that that word or phrase must be for America campaign can gallivant around campus and say disallowed. The phrase, “In America, if you work hard enough whatever they want and they are never forced into a free you can succeed,” is considered a micro-aggression against speech zone. immigrant students because that might Microaggressions, trigger warnings, be offensive to them. I’m not kidding. free speech zones and one more, The statement “illegal immigrant” is safe spaces. A safe space is a physical a micro-aggression against all people The greatest threat to location on a college campus where of Latino background or culture. Western Civilization students can seek refuge when they You cannot say the term “radical hear ideas that are so offensive to them Islamic terrorism,” because that is is what is going on in that they consider themselves to be a microaggression. our colleges. physically unsafe. That’s right: speech is The next is trigger warning. A trigger now considered to be a form of assault warning is when you give advanced on a college campus. When George notice to a student on a college campus Will went to Harvard University, they before you say certain words, phrases, sentences, or thoughts. had to create a safe space with crayons, play dough, milk and For example, the teacher says, “Trigger warning: I’m about to cookies, and teddy bears for students that needed to rehabilitate talk about The Great Gatsby, and within The Great Gatsby after hearing about why free market principles are the greatest there is wide income inequality, so this might offend some of for all people. That’s so offensive for the Harvard students, they the poor students in class.” Soft is what I always say—these needed to seek refuge. You can’t make this up. people are very soft. At Notre Dame, Vice President Pence came to give the Free speech zones—anyone ever encountered those? A free commencement address. Instead of the Leftist students sitting speech zone is something no bigger than a parking space on a quietly and enjoying what should have been the best day of college campus where, only within that zone, between the hours their lives, a hundred students and their parents, mind you, of ten and two, and with prior approval of the administration, stood up in protest in the middle of the speech and left CENTENNIAL REVIEW is published monthly by the Centennial Institute at Colorado Christian University. The authors’ views are not necessarily those of CCU. Designer, Justin Jones. Illustrator, Benjamin Hummel. Subscriptions free upon request. Write to: Centennial Institute, 8787 W. Alameda Ave., Lakewood, CO 80226. Call 800.44.FAITH. Or visit us online at centennial.ccu.edu. Please join the Centennial Institute today. As a Centennial donor, you can help us restore America’s moral core and prepare tomorrow’s leaders. Your gift is tax-deductible. Please use the envelope provided. Thank you for your support. - Jeff Hunt, Director Scan this code with your smartphone to read this and previous issues online. Centennial Review ▪ February 2018 ▪ 2 the commencement because they found his ideas to be so streets, bankrupt, dependent on capitalist countries to support dangerous and so terribly threatening to society.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Talk “Like a Man”: Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Political Science by Jennifer J. Jones Dissertation Committee: Professor Kristen Monroe, Chair Professor Marty Wattenberg Professor Michael Tesler 2017 Chapter 4 c 2016 American Political Science Association and Cambridge University Press. Reprinted with permission. All other materials c 2017 Jennifer J. Jones TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii CURRICULUM VITAE viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xi 1 Introduction 1 2 Theoretical Framework and Literature Review 5 2.1 Social Identity and Its Effect on Social Cognition . 6 2.1.1 Stereotypes and Expectations . 9 2.1.2 Conceptualizing Gender in US Politics . 13 2.2 Gender and Self-Presentation in US Politics . 16 2.2.1 Masculine Norms of Interaction in Institutional Settings . 16 2.2.2 Political Stereotypes and Leadership Prototypes . 18 2.3 The Impact of Political Communication in Electoral Politics . 22 2.4 Do Women Have to Talk Like Men to Be Considered Viable Leaders? . 27 3 Methods: Words are Data 29 3.1 Approaches to Studying Language . 30 3.2 Analyzing Linguistic Style . 34 3.2.1 Gendered Communication and the Feminine/Masculine Ratio . 37 3.2.2 Comparison with Other Coding Schemes . 39 3.3 Approaches to Studying Social Perception and Attitudes . 40 3.3.1 The Link Between Linguistic Style and Implicit Associations . 42 4 The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013 45 4.1 The Case of Hillary Clinton .
    [Show full text]
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics
    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • ASD-Covert-Foreign-Money.Pdf
    overt C Foreign Covert Money Financial loopholes exploited by AUGUST 2020 authoritarians to fund political interference in democracies AUTHORS: Josh Rudolph and Thomas Morley © 2020 The Alliance for Securing Democracy Please direct inquiries to The Alliance for Securing Democracy at The German Marshall Fund of the United States 1700 18th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 T 1 202 683 2650 E [email protected] This publication can be downloaded for free at https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign-money/. The views expressed in GMF publications and commentary are the views of the authors alone. Cover and map design: Kenny Nguyen Formatting design: Rachael Worthington Alliance for Securing Democracy The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), a bipartisan initiative housed at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, develops comprehensive strategies to deter, defend against, and raise the costs on authoritarian efforts to undermine and interfere in democratic institutions. ASD brings together experts on disinformation, malign finance, emerging technologies, elections integrity, economic coercion, and cybersecurity, as well as regional experts, to collaborate across traditional stovepipes and develop cross-cutting frame- works. Authors Josh Rudolph Fellow for Malign Finance Thomas Morley Research Assistant Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Introduction and Methodology ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Trumpism on College Campuses
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Previously Published Works Title Trumpism on College Campuses Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1d51s5hk Journal QUALITATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 43(2) ISSN 0162-0436 Authors Kidder, Jeffrey L Binder, Amy J Publication Date 2020-06-01 DOI 10.1007/s11133-020-09446-z Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Qualitative Sociology (2020) 43:145–163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09446-z Trumpism on College Campuses Jeffrey L. Kidder1 & Amy J. Binder 2 Published online: 1 February 2020 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 Abstract In this paper, we report data from interviews with members of conservative political clubs at four flagship public universities. First, we categorize these students into three analytically distinct orientations regarding Donald Trump and his presidency (or what we call Trumpism). There are principled rejecters, true believers, and satisficed partisans. We argue that Trumpism is a disunifying symbol in our respondents’ self- narratives. Specifically, right-leaning collegians use Trumpism to draw distinctions over the appropriate meaning of conservatism. Second, we show how political clubs sort and shape orientations to Trumpism. As such, our work reveals how student-led groups can play a significant role in making different political discourses available on campuses and shaping the types of activism pursued by club members—both of which have potentially serious implications for the content and character of American democracy moving forward. Keywords Americanpolitics.Conservatism.Culture.Highereducation.Identity.Organizations Introduction Donald Trump, first as a candidate and now as the president, has been an exceptionally divisive force in American politics, even among conservatives who typically vote Republican.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Election Misinformation
    COMBATING ELECTION MISINFORMATION July 30, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 5 INSTRUCTORS................................................................................................................................ 6 OUTLINE ......................................................................................................................................... 8 WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT INFLUENCE OPERATIONS? ................................................... 10 A BIGGER SCALE IN 2020 ................................................................................................................................. 10 A TOP CONCERN OF VOTERS ......................................................................................................................... 11 SOURCES ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 KEY TERMS AND CONCEPTS ...................................................................................................... 13 INFORMATION OPERATIONS AND INFLUENCE OPERATIONS ............................................................ 13 MISINFORMATION ............................................................................................................................................. 13 DISINFORMATION .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Qanon Conspiracy
    THE QANON CONSPIRACY: Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy THE QANON CONSPIRACY: PRESENTED BY Destroying Families, Dividing Communities, Undermining Democracy NETWORK CONTAGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE POLARIZATION AND EXTREMISM RESEARCH POWERED BY (NCRI) INNOVATION LAB (PERIL) Alex Goldenberg Brian Hughes Lead Intelligence Analyst, The Network Contagion Research Institute Caleb Cain Congressman Denver Riggleman Meili Criezis Jason Baumgartner Kesa White The Network Contagion Research Institute Cynthia Miller-Idriss Lea Marchl Alexander Reid-Ross Joel Finkelstein Director, The Network Contagion Research Institute Senior Research Fellow, Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience, Rutgers University SPECIAL THANKS TO THE PERIL QANON ADVISORY BOARD Jaclyn Fox Sarah Hightower Douglas Rushkoff Linda Schegel THE QANON CONSPIRACY ● A CONTAGION AND IDEOLOGY REPORT FOREWORD “A lie doesn’t become truth, wrong doesn’t become right, and evil doesn’t become good just because it’s accepted by the majority.” –Booker T. Washington As a GOP Congressman, I have been uniquely positioned to experience a tumultuous two years on Capitol Hill. I voted to end the longest government shut down in history, was on the floor during impeachment, read the Mueller Report, governed during the COVID-19 pandemic, officiated a same-sex wedding (first sitting GOP congressman to do so), and eventually became the only Republican Congressman to speak out on the floor against the encroaching and insidious digital virus of conspiracy theories related to QAnon. Certainly, I can list the various theories that nest under the QAnon banner. Democrats participate in a deep state cabal as Satan worshiping pedophiles and harvesting adrenochrome from children. President-Elect Joe Biden ordered the killing of Seal Team 6.
    [Show full text]
  • We Welcome Your Support in Our Nonpartisan War on Waste. It's Your
    PAID ADVERTISEMENT President Donald J. Trump The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, In our previous two communications in The Wall Street Journal, we called attention to the lurking threat our country faces from an exploding national debt fueled by runaway government spending. We urged you to lead a national campaign to restore fi scal soundness to our great country by waging a nonpartisan War on Waste. From a recent U.S. Government Accountability Offi ce report*: “Since 2003…cumulative improper payment estimates have totaled about $1.4 trillion.” $1,400,000,000,000. Examples of improper payments are payments to doctors with suspended or revoked medical licenses or to people identifi ed as deceased in federal death fi les. A War on Waste is long overdue. We respectfully recommend that you announce to the nation that you are beginning a four-step War on Waste, that stamping out profl igate government spending is a top priority of your administration. Step 1 – Start a Transparency Revolution Publicize every White House expenditure. Direct every department and agency in your administration to follow suit. Classifi ed expenditures would be excluded. Transparency will be a culture-changing force. It will revolutionize government. It will infl uence how people vote. Knowing there is nowhere to hide will motivate politicians to earn votes with fi scal prudence rather than wasting taxpayer dollars by buying votes. We are living in the Information Age and the Big Data world. There is no reason why every government expenditure should not be public, accessible to the voting public via cell phone, computer, and iPad.
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Platforms: Responses to Perceived Liberal Bias in Social Media
    Partisan Platforms: Responses to Perceived Liberal Bias in Social Media A Research Paper submitted to the Department of Engineering and Society Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science University of Virginia • Charlottesville, Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science, School of Engineering Luke Giraudeau Spring, 2021 On my honor as a University Student, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this assignment as defined by the Honor Guidelines for Thesis-Related Assignments Signature __________________________________________ Date __________ Luke Giraudeau Approved __________________________________________ Date __________ Richard Jacques, Department of Engineering and Society Introduction In the United States, public opinion about tech companies’ political biases is divided along partisan lines (Vogels, Perrin, & Anderson, 2020). In the U.S. since 2018, 69 percent of Republicans claim that technology companies favor liberal views, whereas only 19 percent of Democrats say that technology companies favor the alternative view. Over 50 percent of liberals believe that perspectives are treated equally, whereas only 22 percent of conservatives feel this way. Critics who allege bias have organized to promote legislation such as the Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act (2020) as well as an executive order (Executive Order 13,925, 2020). Furthermore, conservative entrepreneurs have produced new social media platforms such as Gab and Parler that claim
    [Show full text]
  • URMC V127no118 20180403.Pdf (7.352Mb)
    EDITORIAL SPORTS A&C OUR ASCSU CLUB BASEBALL STEPS THE SECRET ENDORSEMENT UP TO THE PLATE LIFE OF C.A.M. Vol. 127, No. 118 Tuesday, April 3, 2018 PAGE 6 PAGE 12 PAGE 13 Zero Waste Team pushes for LSC composting By Austin Fleskes @Austinfleskes07 While back of house composting is already in effect for some of the restaurants in the Lory Student Center, members of Associated Students for Colorado State University and the Zero Waste Team are pushing for front of house composting to be initiated in the student center. Back of house composting for the eight restaurants in the LSC that are owned by the LSC includes composting waste from the kitchens of those restaurants. Front of house composting would consist of getting composting bins in the common area of the LSC for the community to use. Last July, back of house composting began in the LSC owned restaurants, explained Geoff Valdez, the assistant director for retail operations in the LSC. ASCSU Vice Presidential candidate Lynsie Roper and Presidential candidate Liam Aubrey answer questions during the ASCSU Theatre Debate in Valdez said it took about the Lory Student Center on March 21. The Aubrey-Roper campaign has come under fire by student organizations for Aubrey’s previous affiliation three quarters of a year to with conservative group Turning Point USA. PHOTO BY COLIN SHEPHERD COLLEGIAN get to that point, as there was a large education piece that came with back of house composting. Student government presidential candidate Valdez said currently, front of house composting options are being explored for the LSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of Former PAO Director Sarah Isgur Flores
    Non-Responsive Record: Sarah Flores Transmitting Email to OIP ---Forwarded message --- From: Bryant, Errical (OAG) <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:36 AM Subject: FW: Schedule Request - New Attorney Orientation on 3/16/17 To: Flores, Sarah Isgur. (OPA) <[email protected]>, Sarah Isgur Flores Good morning Sarah, We will be adding this event to the AG's calendar. I will list you as the POC and asked that Trisha reach out to you for remark content. Thanks From: Fillbach, Trisha A {OARM) Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:46 PM To: Bryant, Errical {OAG) <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Schedule Request - New Attorney Orientation on 3/16/17 Hi Errical:. Yes, and I appreciate you asking. Attached please find the agenda from last year. We have a relatively similar program planned, but we have a few speaker changes. Specifically, we have a few new Document ID: 0.7.4314.5106 panelists, and Chief Judge Beryl Howell will be ourspeaker from the federal judiciary. Please let me know if I can provide any additional information. We can accommodate the Attorney General at a time that works with his schedule. I appreciate your assistance. Best, Trisha From: Bryant, Errical (OAG) Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:36 PM To: Fillbach, Trisha A. (OARM) <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Schedule Request - New Attorney Orientation on 3/16/17 Good afternoon Trisha, Do you have an agenda from last year's event? I will be happy to check the AG's availability. Thanks From: Fillbach, Trisha A.
    [Show full text]