Editorial to the Special Issue on the Non-Dualizing Philosophy of Josef Mitterer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Editorial to the Special Issue on the Non-Dualizing Philosophy of Josef Mitterer conceptual non-dualizing philosophy EDITORIAL Non-dualizing from Now On? Editorial to the Special Issue on the Non-dualizing Philosophy of Josef Mitterer Alexander Riegler A Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven <[email protected]> Stefan Weber A University of Applied Arts, Vienna <[email protected]> “With the first edition of Kant’s Critique of Pure truth. The last volume, Die Richtung des Den- scriptions in debate do not fail when confront- Reason (1781) the seeds for the ouster of kens [The Direction of Thinking] is in prepara- ed with objects, but rather fail against new de- metaphysics were sown, tion and will deal with a critique of the object- scriptions. Constructivists felt addressed. But an ouster that was vigorously pushed along by orientation of epistemological thought. Mitterer irritated them when he included in logical positivism in the last century. Josef Mitterer was born in 1948 in the small his 1992 book a sharp criticism of the neuro- Josef Mitterer is the proponent of a third Tyrolean village of Westendorf, Austria, which biological foundations of constructivism, es- conceptual revision that, if carried out, is better known for skiing and tourism. He pecially of Humberto Maturana, Francisco would thoroughly change the method studied psychology, sociology and philosophy Varela and Gerhard Roth. Since then, the sci- and the goals of philosophical investigation.” in Innsbruck, Linz, and Graz, and spent some entific community has seemed to be uncertain Ernst von Glasersfeld, this issue, p. 123 time at the London School of Economics, as to whether Mitterer should be labelled a Heidelberg University and the Inter-university constructivist or a critic of constructivism. In Centre Dubrovnik. In 1976 he went to study this special issue we would like to clarify this The philosopher with Paul Feyerabend at the University of Cal- point, among others. ifornia at Berkeley where he continued to de- According to Mitterer’s own philosophy, When the Austrian philosopher Josef Mitterer velop his philosophical ideas. In 1978 he ob- we, the editors, did not exert any pressure on handed out his dissertation Sprache und tained a doctoral degree from the University of the authors to streamline their contributions Wirklichkeit. Eine erkenntnistheoretische Ab- Graz with a dissertation he wrote with Rudolf and terminology to a single “true” translation. handlung [Language and Reality: An Epistemo- Haller, entitled Sprache und Wirklichkeit [Lan- Therefore the reader should not be surprised logical Treatise] to some colleagues for feed- guage and Reality]. After his studies – and due to find a variety of terms referring to Mitterer’s back in the late 1970s, the reactions varied be- to the reasons mentioned above – Mitterer philosophy. Should “nicht-dualisierende Re- tween incomprehension, friendly rejection turned to an entirely different domain, namely deweise” be translated as “non-dualizing and a straight “he must be joking.” Disap- tourism, and worked as a professional tour mode of speaking,” “non-dualistic way of talk- pointed by some rather hostile receptions guide in Europe and Asia and later as a man- ing,” or simply as “non-dualism”? We left it to (some even called it a “danger to academic phi- agement consultant for tour operators in the the authors to find the terminology that fits losophy”) he turned his back on academia. United States and Canada. He condensed his their intentions best, the intention being to Mitterer followed the suggestion of Ludwig experiences in the travel world into the essay honor but also critically evaluate Mitterer’s Wittgenstein, who wrote in Vermischte Be- Der König von Frankreich lebt oder die Wirkli- philosophy across the disciplines. merkungen, “The greeting among philoso- chkeit auf Reisen [The King of France is Alive or phers should be ‘Take your time’,” and did not the Reality of Travel], which was republished as publish the book version of his dissertation The Reality of Travel (cf. the contribution of The contributions until 1992, under the title Das Jenseits der Phi- Matthias Kross in this issue). Since 1990, Mit- losophie. Wider das dualistische Erkennt- terer has been teaching philosophy at the Uni- Is Josef Mitterer’s non-dualizing philosophy nisprinzip [The Beyond of Philosophy: Against versity of Klagenfurt in southern Austria. yet another philosophical flavor, of which the dualistic Principle of Cognition]. In 100 the- In 1988 Mitterer published the article Ab- there are so many in the academic world? Yet ses he developed a non-dualizing epistemolo- schied von der Wahrheit [Farewell to Truth] in another philosophical trinket that arouses the gy, which forgoes the categorical distinction the German philosophical journal DELFIN, short-lived attention of some people and dis- between language and reality beyond lan- which was mainly a platform for constructiv- appears quickly thereafter? Yet another dalli- guage. This book was to become the first in a ist thinking at that time. This publication ance without implications either for philoso- series of three. The second volume, Die Flucht brought Mitterer into contact with Ernst von phy or for science? We are convinced of the aus der Beliebigkeit [The Escape from Arbitrari- Glasersfeld and slowly introduced non-dualis- contrary. For many years Mitterer has steadily ness], published in 2001, is a critical assess- tic philosophy to constructivists. Mitterer’s built up a reputation as an innovative but at ment of the traditional goal of philosophy, i.e., main thesis in the paper was the idea that de- the same time also very careful thinker. His 120 Constructivist Foundations 2008, vol. 3, no. 3 http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/journal/ conceptual non-dualizing philosophy EDITORIAL claims have been discussed in various circles, is the description of the object so far. The claim With the help of cognitive maps Karl H. but, unfortunately, this has so far happened in of a priority of an object compared to the in- Müller charts various flavors of the (radical) German- and Polish-speaking countries only. dication of the object is only possible after the constructivist approach and how they relate Meanwhile “take your time” has taken time indication of the object. This means that we to each other, and shows the importance of and Mitterer celebrated his 60th birthday in cannot claim that there are objects beyond Mitterer’s philosophy for radical constructiv- July 2008, an opportunity we used to gather claims. Otherwise we get trapped in an infinite ist (RC) research. He considers Mitterer’s connoisseurs of his work to discuss, for the regress. work as a radical critique of the semantic turn. first time in the English language, his achieve- Franz Ofner starts with the observation The relevance of non-dualism varies accord- ments and impact. The result is in no relation that Mitterer has not developed a non-dualis- ing to the use of the term “radical constructiv- to the limited spread of his ideas so far. We have tic concept of action. He suggests that George ism.” Its relevance is significant if RC is viewed collected some 22 contributions covering a Herbert Mead’s theory, in his opinion con- as a new epistemology but left marginal if RC large variety of intellectual terrain and point- taining a non-dualistic nucleus, may be a way is a label for a group of empirical research pro- ing out the potential impact of his philosophy to implement this missing link. grams. from now on. Volker Gadenne intends to reconcile real- ism and constructivism and proposes a cau- Non-dualizing Philosophy and Reconstructing tious or “fallibilistic” version of realism by tak- Actor-Network Theory Philosophical Dualisms ing constructivist criticism seriously and In Poland, a group of young philosophers has In the first section three authors try to identify treating knowledge as a constructive process. worked out the links between Mitterer’s phi- traces of non-dualistic thinking in the history He argues that non-dualism is wrong when it losophy and the actor-network theory (ANT) of philosophy. says that a thesis does not fail by means of the of Bruno Latour et al. Two of them present the The conceptual analysis of Ernst von Gla- object, but by means of a new thesis. Gadenne details of their work in this section. sersfeld scrutinizes the notion of dichotomy, reminds us that there is experience between a Krzysztof Abriszewski compares Mitter- which is Mitterer’s main task as well. The au- thesis and its failure. er’s non-dualizing way of speaking (NDS) thor discusses Ogden’s work on dichotomy with Latour’s ANT. Despite their different re- and concludes with the claim that non-dualiz- Non-dualizing Philosophy and spective backgrounds – ANT is a continua- ing philosophy is an excellent example of how (Radical) Constructivism tion of social studies of science situated in the to counter the tradition of realism. Mitterer’s philosophy has always been said to field of sociology of knowledge while NDS be- Christian Meierhofer aims to reproduce have close ties with (radical) constructivism longs to the domain of philosophy of lan- the development of non-dualism by drawing despite Mitterer’s attempts to keep equidis- guage and epistemology – the author shows similarities and associations between Mitter- tance to both realism and constructivism (cf. that there is a certain degree of convergence er’s work, and cultural theories and philoso- the brief remark in his text in this special is- between them. phies prior to Mitterer. In particular he points sue). Four authors in this section explore this The paper by Ewa Binczyk embraces Mit- out that there are some interesting analogies alleged relationship. terer’s criticism of dualistic ways of thinking between Mitterer and the work of James, Rick- The section starts with one of Josef Mitter- and speaking.
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae NAME: Theo HUG Year of Birth: 1960 ADDRESS: Private: Kiefernweg 8, A–6413 Wildermieming University: Department of Media, Society and Communication University of Innsbruck, Universitaetsstr. 15, A–6020 Innsbruck Tel.: +43-(0)512-507-44610 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.hug-web.at/ http:/medien.uibk.ac.at ACADEMIC EDUCATION: – 1978 – 1984: studies in psychology, pedagogy, mathematics and philosophy at the University of Innsbruck; March 1985: Dr. phil. in psychology and pedagogy – March 1986 – May 1987: academic trainee at the Institute of Philosophy and the Institute of Educational Sciences (University of Innsbruck) – May 1987 – February 1991: research in higher education and teaching assignments at the Institute of Educational Sciences (University of Innsbruck) – May 1992 – September 1997: university assistant and teacher at the University of Innsbruck – January 1996: postdoctoral qualification at the University of Innsbruck (habilitation) – since October 1997: associate professor at the Innsbruck of University (Austria) – since March 2011: full professor at the Innsbruck of University (Austria) OTHER ACADEMIC POSITIONS and MAJOR VISITING APPOINTMENTS – 1997/98: guest professor at the Institute of Educational Sciences (University of Vienna) – 1998/99: guest lecturer at the Academy for Social Work in Salzburg and the Centre for Science and Continued Education in Schloss Hofen (Austria) – 2001: guest professor at the Institute of Educational Sciences (University of Graz) – 1999-2003: guest professor at the Faculty of Education (Free University of Bozen / Italy) – 2003: guest professor at the School of Computing and Information Technology (Brisbane / AU) – 2005: visiting scholar at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology / M.I.T. (Cambridge / US) Several talks at different Universities including Innsbruck, Klagenfurt, Linz and Vienna (Austria), Brixen, Ferrara (Italy), Lausanne (Switzerland), Lillehammer (Norway), Ham- burg, Heidelberg, Lüneburg, Ladenburg, Cologne, Wiesbaden, Göttingen etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Pkf) Legend: Happened Ongoing, Activities Have Started Agreed, Being Envisaged/ Planned Hypothetical/ Possible
    Version July 5, 2021 Current list of events (happened, ongoing, agreed, hypothetical) for the centennial of the birth of Paul K. Feyerabend (pkf) Legend: Happened Ongoing, activities have started Agreed, being envisaged/ planned Hypothetical/ possible When Where What Leads Aug 2019 California Visit to California to gather missing material for the Nachlass + interviews for pkf Matteo Collodel + biography. Five boxes collected and sent via mail to the PKF Nachlass in Konstanz. Susan Crosby Oct 2019 Amsterdam Festival Feyerabend --Three nights of experimental art Netherland https://korzo.nl/en/themes/festival-feyerabend/ focusing on artistic experiment and research. 2020 +++ Online Web pages dedicated to the PKF centennial Grazia BF (gbf) 2020 Iran Farsi translation of The Tyranny of Science – Moshen Khademi 2020 China Chinese version of Three dialogues on Knowledge (2020). Yuanlin Guo 2020 +++ Publication of three volumes of PKF correspondence and unpublished papers Matteo Collodel & (Feyerabend’s Formative Years. Volume 1. Feyerabend and Popper is published, vol 2 + 3 Eric Oberheim waiting for resources) -- Vienna Circle Institute Library & Springler page 1 Version July 5, 2021 2021 Russia Killing Time translated and published in Russian by Rosebud (Moscow) Victor Zatsepin 19 March Glasgow Education for a Free Society – a Workshop at the University of Strathclyde. Proceedings Karsten Kenklies & 2021 (Scotland) under preparation, to be launched in 2024. Sebastian Engelmann 2021 A Theory of Wonder. Volume dedicated to pkf in the centennial occasion. Vernon Press Gonzalo Munevar https://vernonpress.com/book/1263 2021 Global Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ( 2021) Jamie Shaw and Karim B’Shir (editors) 2021 Global New research publications Jamie Shaw “Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine” “Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy” 2024 Online “2024: not one day without a pkf quote”.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Jenseits Der Philosophie Wider Das Dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip
    Josef Mitterer Das Jenseits der Philosophie Wider das dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip Mit einem Nachwort zur Neuausgabe 2011 © Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist 2011 Vorwort Der Problemkanon der Philosophie, vor allem jener der Erkenntnistheorie, hat sich seit Platon nur wenig verändert. Die Probleme haben die Versuche, sie zu lösen, über- dauert. Am Anfang der Philosophie stehen nicht Probleme, sondern nicht-problematisierte Voraussetzungen. Diese Voraussetzungen sind dichotomische Unterscheidungen (in der Erkenntnis- theorie und Sprachphilosophie etwa die Dichotomien Sprache – Welt, Beschreibung – Objekt, Aussage – Gegenstand, Sein – Bewusstsein, Subjekt – Objekt und andere). Der Versuch, die Beziehung zwischen den Gliedern dieser Dichotomien zu klären, führt zu den philosophischen Problemen (Objektivitätsproblem, Referenzproblem, Identitätsproblem, Außenweltproblem, vor allem aber zum Wahrheitsproblem). Die dichotomischen Unterscheidungen bilden die dogmatisch festgelegte Basis ei- nes Philosophierens, das als Dualistisches Philosophieren bezeichnet werden kann, und die Tradition des Dualismus ist in der Gegenwart beinahe ebenso übermächtig wie in der Vergangenheit. Die dualistische Philosophie variiert, je nachdem, wie das Verhältnis zwischen den Gliedern der Dichotomien bestimmt wird, zwischen naivem Realismus und radikalem Konstruktivismus. Allen Varianten gemeinsam ist, dass ein Jenseits des Diskurses vor- ausgesetzt wird, das die Richtung des philosophischen Diskurses bestimmt. Dieses Jenseits kann sein: die Welt des Realisten,
    [Show full text]
  • Science Conducted in Public Under Clandestine Attack
    Science Conducted in Public under Clandestine Attack Call for solidarity: The Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory in Belgrade is in danger The renowned Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory Belgrade (IFDT) has a long history of liberal thinking. Founded by dissident intellectuals expelled from the university for their involvement in the Yugoslav 1968 movement, it was, in the 1990s, at the forefront of the opposition to the policies of Slobodan Milošević. Zoran Đinđić, philosopher and the first Serbian head of government in the post-Miloševic era, who was assassinated while in power in 2003, had worked at this Institute for several years. The IFDT is now, it seems, to be put on a political leash. The Serbian government has appointed a new Governing Board that includes several highly controversial political figures. For example, Zoran Avramović, the nominated President of the Board, was promoted to official leading positions in the Ministry of Education by the right-wing Radical Party of Vojislav Šešelj (who was sentenced by the Hague Tribunal). Avramović has already intimated what he thinks of the institute when he urged for suspension of financing for the IFDT Regional Centre in Novi Sad. The current Acting Director uses repressive measures that indicate what the future of the institute will look like (threats to suspend salaries, attempts to curb the freedom of the Institute's Scientific Council, junior researchers put under pressure, international projects suspended, etc.). Democracy, and specifically the scientific and education landscape in Serbia, is increasingly under threat. There are few remaining free media. The current attempt to muzzle and perhaps even eliminate an autonomous academic institution like IFDT further weakens Serbian democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations Issn 1782-348X
    Volume 3, Number 2 March 2008 CONSTRUCTIVIST FOUNDATIONS ISSN 1782-348X Target Article B Ernst von Glasersfeld Who Conceives of Society? With commentaries by Arne Kjellman · Siegfried J. Schmidt · Marco Bettoni · Jean-Louis Le Moigne · Reuben Hersh · Dewey Dykstra · Leslie Steffe · Vincent Kenny · Karl H. Müller · Peter Meyer · Andreas Quale · Jonathan D. Raskin · Leon R. Tsvasman · Niels Birbaumer · Martin V. Butz · Ezequiel Di Paolo · Klaus Krippendorff · Sal Restivo · Dirk Baecker · Christian Fuchs · Kenneth J. Gergen B Humberto R. Maturana The Biological Foundations of Virtual Realities and Their Implications for Human Existence Book Reviews B Evelyne Andreewsky & Robert Delorme (eds.) Seconde cybernétique et complexité: Rencontres avec Heinz von Foerster, reviewed by Frédéric Erpicum B Evan Thompson – Mind in life. Phenomenology, and the sciences of mind, reviewed by Kevin McGee Advisory Board DESCRIPTION William Clancey Constructivist Foundations (CF) is an independent academic peer-reviewed e-journal NASA Ames Research Center, USA without commercial interests. Its aim is to promote scientific foundations and applications Ranulph Glanville of constructivist sciences, to weed out pseudoscientific claims and to base constructivist CybernEthics Research, UK sciences on sound scientific foundations, which do not equal the scientific method with Ernst von Glasersfeld objectivist claims. The journal is concerned with the interdisciplinary study of all forms of University of Massachusetts, USA constructivist sciences, especially radical constructivism, biology of cognition, Vincent Kenny cybersemiotics, enactive cognitive science, epistemic structuring of experience, non- Accademia Costruttivista di dualism, second order cybernetics, the theory of autopoietic systems, etc. Terapia Sistemica, Italy Klaus Krippendorff University of Pennsylvania, USA AIM AND SCOPE Humberto Maturana Institute Matríztica, Chile The basic motivation behind the journal is to make peer-reviewed constructivist papers Josef Mitterer available to the academic audience free of charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition Konturen E R
    Zur menschlichen Vernunft gehören auch die Gefühle, denn sie geben uns Orientierung. Aber Naturromantik, Nabelschau und Nostalgie bringen uns nicht weiter. Nur wer mit dem Herzen in die Zukunft denkt, wird Konturen erkennen, die einer kritischen Überprüfung standhalten. Vorschau Frühjahr 2021 N Edition Konturen E R U T Die richtigen Fragen • Wien – Hamburg N K O K N EDITIO www.konturen.cc [ Vorschau Frühjahr 2021 ] | 1 NEUE REIHE „KURVEN“ Das System wird kippen, aber bitte sanft! Unsicherheit ist für viele Menschen bedrückend. Albena Azmanova sieht dabei auch eine Chance, entscheidende Veränderungen herbeizuführen – ohne schwere Krise des Kapitalismus, große Utopien oder sogar Revolutionen. Selbst Menschen, die gut verdienen, sind mit der Monotonie, in der sie leben, nicht mehr zufrieden, wagen es aber angesichts unsicherer Zeiten nicht, sie aufzubrechen. Viele Wohlhabende fühlen sich keineswegs als Gewinner des Systems, sondern als Opfer. Helfen kann hier nur eine Stärkung der sozialen Absicherung. Sie erlaubt es den Menschen, sich zu verändern. Und sie stellt auch die Wirtschaft auf die umweltfreundlichsten Produkte um, die es gibt: Liebe und Zuwendung, Vertrauen und gegenseitige Unterstützung. Albena Azmanova hat selbst die friedliche Revolution in Bulgarien erlebt und weiß, wovon sie spricht. Sie ist außerordentliche Professorin für politische und soziale Theorie an der Brussels School of International Studies (BSIS) der Universität Kent. Sie studierte in Bulgarien, Frankreich und promovierte an der New School for Social Research in New York. Sie lehrte politische Theorie am Institut d‘études politiques de Paris (Sciences Po) in Paris, bevor sie 2005 an die BSIS kam, wo sie die Programme Internationale Politische Ökonomie und Politische Strategie und Kommunikation leitet.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwik Fleck. Tradycje – Inspiracje – Interpretacje
    Copyright by Wydawnictwo Fundacji Projekt Nauka & Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Śląskich we Wrocławiu Wydanie I Wrocław 2015 Recenzenci: prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Srogosz prof. dr hab. Andrzej Felchner Korekta: Emil Szczerbuk Skład i łamanie, przygotowanie e-publikacji: Agnieszka Kaczmarek, Studio Grafpa, www.grafpa.pl Prace redakcyjne nad tomem w części wykonanej przez Pawła Jarnickiego zostały zrealizowane w ramach projektu finansowanego przez Narodowe Centrum Nauki na podstawie decyzji DEC-2012/06/M/HS2/00313. ISBN 978-83-63270-14-8 Wydawnictwo Fundacji „Projekt Nauka” ul. Gwarecka 8/12 54-143 Wrocław [email protected] www.projekt-nauka.com Spis treści Bożena Płonka-Syroka Wstęp ........................................................................................................................... 5 Część I – Tradycje Bożena Płonka-Syroka Metodologia Ludwika Flecka w kontekście standardu teoretycznego medycyny klinicznej (1750–1935) ................................................................................................ 13 Karol Sauerland Fleck i nominalizm ....................................................................................................... 41 Leszek Żuk Trzy aspekty poznania naukowego w świetle koncepcji Ludwika Flecka ...................... 49 Część II – Inspiracje Dariusz Zienkiewicz Porównawcza teoria poznania – antidotum na metafizyczne zaklęcia ......................... 77 Bogdan Balicki Ludwik Fleck i (radykalny) konstruktywizm .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Written Word
    Symposium THE WRITTEN WORD 19 – 21 February, 2015 The Karl Popper Charitable Trust South Croydon, England Evert Willem Beth Foundation, Amsterdam Thursday, 19 February 2015 Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, HS 5 (Mensa Building) Chair: Jack Birner (Università di Trento) 09.00 Brian Boyd (University of Auckland): “Popper’s World 3: Origins, Progress, and Import” 10.00 Coffee Break 10.30 Hubert Cambier (Independent Scholar, Bruxelles): “The Evolutionist Meaning of World 3” 11.30 Henk Visser (Universiteit Maastricht): “Private Notes on Popper by His First Dutch Follower Adriaan de Groot” 12.30 Lunch (Mensa) 13.30 Guided Tour: Karl Popper Collection of the Main Library Chair: Reinhard Neck (Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt) 15.00 Francesco Di Iorio (LUISS, Roma): “World 3 and Methodological Individualism in Popper’s Thought” 16.00 Coffee Break 16.30 Jeremy Shearmur (Australian National University, Canberra): “Popper, Objectification and the Problem of the Public Sphere” 17.30 Miloš Taliga (Matej Bel University, Banská Bystrica): “Why the Objectivist Interpretation of Falsification Matters” 2 | P a g e Friday, 20 February 2015 Chair: Josef Mitterer (Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt) 09.00 Zuzana Parusniková (Czech Academy of Sciences, Praha): “Criticism of Popper’s World 3 “Ontology”” 10.00 Coffee Break 10.30 Volker Gadenne (Johannes Kepler Universität Linz): “Is there a Third World?” 11.30 Harald Stelzer (Karl Franzens Universität Graz): “Principles and Policies. What Can we Learn from Popper's Piecemeal Social Engineering for Ideal
    [Show full text]