Final Recommendations - South West Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Recommendations - South West Region Final recommendations - South West region Contents 1. Initial/revised proposals overview p1 8. Sub-region 3: Bristol p17, recommendations p17 2. Number of representations received p3 9. Sub-region 4: Cornwall, Devon, Isles of Scilly, Plymouth and Torbay p18, recommendations p20 3. Campaigns p4 10. Sub-region 5: Gloucestershire, and South Gloucestershire p20, recommendations p24 4. Major issues p5 11. Sub-region 6: North Somerset p24, recommendations p25 5. Final recommendations p7 12. Sub-region 7: Swindon: p26, recommendations p27 6. Sub-region 1: Bath and North East Somerset, and Somerset 13. Appendix A p12, recommendations p13 7. Sub-region 2: Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole, and Wiltshire p14, recommendations p16 Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The South West region was allocated 53 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of two from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub-regions: Table 1A - Constituency allocation Sub-region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Bath and North East 7 7 7 Somerset, and Somerset Bristol 4 4 4 Cornwall, Devon, Isles of 18 17 17 Scilly, Plymouth, and Torbay Bournemouth, Dorset, 13 12 12 Poole, and Wiltshire Gloucestershire, and South 9 9 9 Gloucestershire North Somerset 2 2 2 1 Swindon 2 2 2 2. Under the initial proposals nine of the existing 55 constituencies were unchanged. The revised proposals retained 11 of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under both the initial and revised proposals it was proposed to have four constituencies that crossed county boundaries. We proposed one constituency which crossed both the Cornwall and Devon county boundaries, combining the towns of Bideford, Bude and Launceston to form a constituency of that name. In Dorset and Wiltshire we combined the towns of Warminster and Shaftesbury in a constituency of that name to form a cross-county constituency. We combined electors from the north-east of the County of Somerset with electors from Bath, and North East Somerset in one constituency called North East Somerset. Finally, we proposed that some electors from the County of Gloucestershire were combined with electors from the District of South Gloucestershire to form the Dursley, Thornbury and Yate constituency. 3. In response to the consultation on the initial proposals and secondary consultation, the Commission received just over 2,000 representations regarding the South West region. These representations commented on most parts of the region, with the main issues being: ● The proposed Bideford, Bude and Launceston (‘Devonwall’) cross-county constituency: respondents objected to the inclusion of wards from Cornwall in a cross-county constituency with Devon. ● The constituencies in the Bournemouth and Poole area: respondents objected to changes made to the existing pattern of constituencies in Bournemouth and Poole. 2 ● The constituencies in Gloucestershire: respondents opposed the division of Stroud between three constituencies, the inclusion of the two Quedgeley wards in the Stroud constituency and the inclusion of the seven southernmost wards from Stroud in the proposed Dursley, Thornbury and Yate constituency. They also objected to the inclusion of the Borough of Cheltenham ward of Springbank in the proposed Tewkesbury constituency, and change of constituency name from Forest of Dean to West Gloucestershire. 4. In considering the evidence received, the Commission altered 49% of constituencies in the South West region: five of these constituencies were only subject to a change of name. Number of representations received 5. In the South West region, the Commission received a total of 952 representations during consultation on the revised proposals, bringing the total number of representations for this region to 2,971. This number included all those who gave evidence at the public hearings. There were also a number of duplicate representations within this total, as well as representations that made general comments that did not have any bearing on the substance of the initial proposals. Table 1B - Representations received Type of respondents Consultation on revised proposals Total number of representations Member of Parliament 6 48 Official political party 5 16 response 3 Peer from House of Lords 0 0 Local councillor 43 197 Local authority 3 19 Parish or town council 11 71 Other organisation 8 64 Member of the public 876 2,556 Total 952 2,971 6. While many of the representations can be categorised as opposing the Commission’s revised proposals, there has been a degree of support for certain constituencies across the whole region. These include, but are not limited to, both Bournemouth constituencies, Poole, Christchurch, Cheltenham, and within Wiltshire. Campaigns 7. No campaigns were received for the South West region during consultation on the revised proposals. During the previous consultations the Commission received three campaigns. 4 Major issues 8. Major issues that drew objection in response to the revised proposals were as follows: Bath and North East Somerset, and Somerset ● Somerton and Frome constituency: opposition to Frome remaining in its current constituency of Somerton and Frome. Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole, and Wiltshire ● West Wiltshire, and North Wiltshire constituencies: objection to dividing the Parish of Box between these constituencies. ● Mid Dorset and Christchurch constituencies: opposition to splitting the town of Verwood between these constituencies. Bristol ● There were no major issues that drew objection in this sub-region. 5 Gloucestershire, and South Gloucestershire ● Tewkesbury and Gloucester constituencies: objection to the Gloucester City wards of Elmbridge and Longlevens being included in the Tewkesbury constituency instead of the Gloucester constituency. ● Dursley, Thornbury and Yate, and Stroud constituencies: opposition to the wards of Cam West, Cam East, and Dursley being included in the proposed Dursley, Thornbury and Yate constituency. Cornwall, Devon, Isles of Scilly, Plymouth, and Torbay ● Exeter, and East Devon constituencies: both opposition to and support for the Exeter City ward of St. Loyes being included in the Exeter constituency, rather than in East Devon where it is currently located. ● Bideford, Bude and Launceston constituency: opposition to this proposed cross-county constituency as it combines wards from the counties of Devon and Cornwall. North Somerset ● There were no major issues that drew objection in this sub-region. Swindon ● There were no major issues that drew objection in this sub-region. 6 Final recommendations 9. In light the of the representations and evidence received we have considered whether the revised proposals should be changed. Table 2 - Sub-regions used Initial proposals Revised proposals Final recommendations Bath and North East Somerset, and Bath and North East Somerset, and Bath and North East Somerset, and Somerset Somerset Somerset Bristol Bristol Bristol Cornwall, Devon, Isles of Scilly, Cornwall, Devon, Isles of Scilly, Cornwall, Devon, Isles of Scilly, Plymouth Plymouth and Torbay Plymouth and Torbay and Torbay Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole and Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole and Bournemouth, Dorset, Poole and Wiltshire Wiltshire Wiltshire Gloucestershire and South Gloucestershire and South Gloucestershire and South Gloucestershire Gloucestershire Gloucestershire North Somerset North Somerset North Somerset Swindon Swindon Swindon 7 10.The final recommendations have been formulated on the same sub-regions used as the initial and revised proposals. 11. We received an alternative whole region scheme proposing substantial changes to Dorset that included two split ward solutions; splitting the South Gloucestershire District ward of Boyd Valley and the North Dorset District ward of Hill Forts. This counter-proposal suggested that the Shaftesbury area is combined with Salisbury to form a constituency, rather than Warminster (going across east/west). This proposal also substantially reconfigured the Poole, Bournemouth and Christchurch constituencies, even though we had received substantial support for the revised proposals for this region. 12.We also received a counter-proposal suggesting that Hampshire be included in a sub-region with Wiltshire, crossing the South West/South East regional boundary in an attempt to keep the ward of Chilworth, Nursling and Rownhams in the South East region constituency of Test Valley. Commissioners should note paragraph 20 (page 6) of the ‘Guide to the 2018 Review of Parliamentary constituencies’, which states that there would need to be ‘very compelling reasons’ for the Commission to depart from the region based approach to the current review. 13.All other representations have not proposed alternative sub-regions. 8 Table 3 - Headline numbers for schemes Schemes Constituencies - ward changes Local authorities in Constituencies constituency crossing a county boundary Number Number One-ward Two-to-five Six-ward One Two Three Two Three wholly changed by change ward and more or unchanged rewarding change change more only Initial proposals 9 4 10 13 17 32 15 6 4 0 Revised proposals 10 4 10 15 14 32 15 6 4 0 Final 11 4 10 14 14 32 15 6 4 0 recommendations 14.Under the final recommendations 11 of the existing constituencies are unchanged. As in the initial and revised proposals, four constituencies are proposed to cross county boundaries. 9 More detailed breakdown of
Recommended publications
  • Hereford to Ross-On-Wye & Gloucester Gloucester to Ross-On
    Valid from 5 January 2020 Page 1 of 2 33 Gloucester to Ross-on-Wye & Hereford MONDAYS TO SATURDAYS except Bank Holiday Mondays MF MF Sat Sat MF Sat MF Sat MF 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 Gloucester Transport Hub [H] 0640 0740 0745 0850 0950 1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1450 1550 1600 1650 1710 1750 Churcham Bulley Lane 0651 0752 0759 0904 1004 1104 1204 1304 1404 1504 1504 1604 1614 1704 1724 1804 Huntley Red Lion 0655 0756 0803 0908 1008 1108 1208 1308 1408 1508 1508 1608 1618 1708 1728 1808 Mitcheldean Lamb 0706 0808 0814 0919 1019 1119 1219 1319 1419 1519 1519 1619 1629 1719 1739 1819 Lea The Crown 0715 0817 0823 0928 1028 1128 1228 1328 1428 1528 1528 1628 1638 1728 1748 1828 Pontshill Postbox - 0822 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Weston-u-Penyard Penyard Gardens 0720 0826 0828 0933 1033 1133 1233 1333 1433 1533 1533 1633 1643 1733 1753 1833 John Kyrle High School - 0835 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ross-on-Wye Cantilupe Road [1] arr. 0730 0840 0835 0940 1040 1140 1240 1340 1440 1540 1540 1640 1650 1740 1800 1840 q q q q q q q q q q q q q q Ross-on-Wye Cantilupe Road [1] dep. 0635 0735 0745 0845 0845 0845 0945 1045 1145 1245 1345 1445 1545 1545 1645 1655 1845 John Kyrle High School - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1550 - - - Peterstow Post Offi ce 0647 0747 0757 0857 0857 0857 0957 1057 1157 1257 1357 1457 1557 1602 1657 1707 1857 Kingsthorne Little Birch Turn 0702 0802 0812 0912 0912 0912 1012 1112 1212 1312 1412 1512 1612 1617 1712 1722 1912 Hereford Bridge Street 0717 0827 0827 0927 0927 0927 1027 1127 1227 1327 1427 1527 1627 1632 1727 1737 1927 Hereford Railway Station 0725 0835 0835 0935 0935 0935 1035 1135 1235 1335 1435 1535 1635 1640 1735 1745 1935 MF Only runs on Mondays to Fridays.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOUCESTER & BRISTOL, a Descriptive Account of Each Place
    Hunt & Co.’s Directory March 1849 - Transcription of the entry for Dursley, Gloucestershire Hunt & Co.’s Directory for the Cities of Gloucester and Bristol for March 1849 Transcription of the entry for Dursley and Berkeley, Gloucestershire Background The title page of Hunt & Co.’s Directory & Topography for the Cities of Gloucester and Bristol for March 1849 declares: HUNT & CO.'S DIRECTORY & TOPOGRAPHY FOR THE CITIES OF GLOUCESTER & BRISTOL, AND THE TOWNS OF BERKELEY, CIRENCESTER, COLEFORD, DURSLEY, LYDNEY, MINCHINHAMPTON, MITCHEL-DEAN, NEWENT, NEWNHAM, PAINSWICK, SODBURY, STROUD, TETBURY, THORNBURY, WICKWAR, WOTTON-UNDER-EDGE, &c. W1TH ABERAVON, ABERDARE, BRIDGEND, CAERLEON, CARDIFF, CHEPSTOW, COWBRIDCE, LLANTRISSAINT, MERTHYR, NEATH, NEWBRIDGE, NEWPORT, PORTHCAWL, PORT-TALBOT, RHYMNEY, TAIBACH, SWANSEA, &c. CONTAINING THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF The Nobility, Gentry, Clergy, PROFESSIONAL GENTLEMEN, TRADERS, &c. RESlDENT THEREIN. A Descriptive Account of each Place, POST-OFFICE INFORMATION, Copious Lists of the Public Buildings, Law and Public Officers - Particulars of Railroads, Coaches, Carriers, and Water Conveyances - Distance Tables, and other Useful Information. __________________________________________ MARCH 1849. ___________________________________________ Hunt & Co. produced several trade directories in the mid 1850s although the company was not prolific like Pigot and Kelly. The entry for Dursley and Berkeley, which also covered Cambridge, Uley and Newport, gave a comprehensive listing of the many trades people in the area together with a good gazetteer of what the town was like at that time. The entry for Dursley and Berkeley is found on pages 105-116. This transcription was carried out by Andrew Barton of Dursley in 2005. All punctuation and spelling of the original is retained. In addition the basic layout of the original work has been kept, although page breaks are likely to have fallen in different places.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of ELECTION Election of Parish Councillors
    NOTICE OF ELECTION South Gloucestershire Council Election of Parish Councillors for the Parishes listed below Number of Parish Councillors to Number of Parish Councillors to Parishes Parishes be elected be elected Acton Turville Five Marshfield Nine Almondsbury, Almondsbury Four Oldbury-on-Severn Seven Almondsbury, Compton Two Oldland, Cadbury Heath Seven Almondsbury, Cribbs Causeway Seven Oldland, Longwell Green Seven Alveston Eleven Oldland, Mount Hill One Aust Seven Olveston Nine Badminton Seven Patchway, Callicroft Nine Bitton, North Common Six Patchway, Coniston Six Bitton, Oldland Common Four Pilning & Severn Beach, Pilning Four Bitton, South Four Pilning & Severn Beach, Severn Six Beach Bradley Stoke, North Six Pucklechurch Nine Bradley Stoke, South Seven Rangeworthy Five Bradley Stoke, Stoke Brook Two Rockhampton Five Charfield Nine Siston, Common Three Cold Ashton Five Siston, Rural One Cromhall Seven Siston, Warmley Five Dodington, North East Four Sodbury, North East Five Dodington, North West Eight Sodbury, Old Sodbury Five Dodington, South Three Sodbury, South West Five Downend & Bromley Heath, Downend Ten Stoke Gifford, Central Nine Downend & Bromley Heath, Staple Hill Two Stoke Gifford, University Three Doynton Five Stoke Lodge and the Common Nine Dyrham & Hinton Five Thornbury, Central Three Emersons Green, Badminton Three Thornbury, East Three Emersons Green, Blackhorse Three Thornbury, North East Four Emersons Green, Emersons Green Seven Thornbury, North West Three Emersons Green, Pomphrey Three Thornbury, South Three
    [Show full text]
  • December 2008
    Unemployment Bulletin Page Volume 5 December 2008 Contents INTRODUCTION The Unemployment Bulletin provides a monthly update on unemployment data for Part 1: Summary Gloucestershire, the South West region and the United Kingdom. It is produced by A summary of the Economic section of the County Council Chief Executive’s Support Unit unemployment data at Research Team. The data is sourced from the Office for National Statistics via district, County, regional Nomis (www.nomis.co.uk). and national level 1 The claimant count measures the number of people claiming unemployment- Part 2: County related benefit (currently Job Seeker’s allowance). The claimant rate is the number Unemployment figures of claimants as a proportion of the working age population. for the County compared to the South West and PART 1: SUMMARY the rest of the UK 3 The claimant rate in Gloucestershire was 2.3% in December 2008. This was an Part 3: Districts increase of 0.1% on the November 2008 figure. The rate has been continually A comparative break increasing since July 2008. Both the UK and the South West rates increased by down of unemployment 0.2% between November 2008 and December 2008. Gloucestershire’s rate figures by district 4 remains slightly above the South West average of 2.1%, but 0.7% lower than the UK average of 3%. Part 4: Wards Further breakdown of The claimant count in Gloucestershire in December 2008 rose by 658 people. The unemployment figures amount of people claiming in December 2008 was 9% higher than the number in by ward: November 2008 compared to 12% in the South West and 9% for the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Briefing for Commissioners
    Census Briefing for Commissioners Louise Li Strategic Needs Analysis Performance and Need Gloucestershire County Council October 2013 Contact: [email protected] 01452 328555 Census Briefing for Commissioners CONTENT Summary Page 3-8 Purpose of the Paper 9 The Census 2011 9 The Population 9-11 The Environment 12-14 The Communities 15-18 Children, Young People and Families 19-21 Working in Gloucestershire 22-24 Health and Care 25-27 ******************************************************* Appendices (Maps) Page 28-29 Appendix 1: Population Density in Gloucestershire Appendix 2: Proportion of Households with Access to a Car Appendix 3: Number of Households Deprived in 3 or More Dimensions Appendix 4: Proportion of Out-of-Work Households with Dependent Children 2 Census Briefing for Commissioners SUMMARY The Population (page 9-11) With a population of 596,984, Gloucestershire was the second most populated county in the region in 2011. There were an additional 1,100 non-UK short-term residents who were not counted as usual residents on the Census day. The population growth rate between 2001 and 2011 at 5.7%, or an annual growth of 3,200 people, was lower than the national average of 7.8%. A third of the growth was attributable to Gloucester where demographic demand for services and infrastructure would have surged during the period. The current population consisted of 136,600 children and young people aged 0- 19, 349,000 adults aged 20-64, and 111,400 older people aged 65 or above. This included an increase in the working age and the older population, and a small reduction in the number of children and young people in the previous 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Cam Long Down and Uley
    Cotswold Way Circular Walks 9. Hills and Hillforts - Cam Long Down and Uley The incredible variety of the y Cotswold Way is once again Ashmead a Green W explored by this stunning little d walk. From woodland tracks to Cam Long Down 3 l o open hilltops, it leads you around w s B4066 the intriguing ancient history of t Hodgecombe o N C Uley Bury to the more recent Farm remains of a pestilent past. 2 Even the few hillside climbs are 4 rewarded by compass-wide views Crawley Peaked that spread out all around you Hydehill Down back into the heart of the 6 Uley Cotswolds and across the Uleyfield Bury Severn Estuary into Wales... 5 1 Distance: Hydegate 4 miles or 6.5km Cotswold Way Duration: Chipping Downham Start 2½ - 3½ hours Campden Hill Uley Difficulty: Moderate to difficult, some stiles, Optional detour steps and steep sections. Uley 0 Miles 0.5 Public transport: No. 20 bus from Stroud. (See the 0 Kms 0.5 B4066 ‘Explore the Cotswolds’ public Bath transport guide or visit www. 11/17 traveline.info side of the hill until you meet the Start/Finish: the test of time two and a half perfect spot to look back around six-way fingerpost in the shaded Grid reference SO 792/986 millennia later. Ignoring the path to the high points of your walk. the left, head straight on up onto dell at the bottom. (OS Explorer sheet 167) the ramparts, and continue round Known locally as ‘Smallpox Hill’ Postcode GL11 5SN until you pass through a gate at the 4 For a very short detour to it was also once the site of an Refreshments: end.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest of Dean Plan Hwc , Item 9
    1. Overview of the Forest of Dean The modelled demand for future developments of housing with care in the Forest of Dean has highlighted an additional requirement as detailed in Table 1. Table 1: Modelled demand for housing with care Housing with care model Extra care Extra care affordable rent by 2041 Supported living by 2035 shared ownership/outright sales by 2041 Additional units required 182 0 20 Future developments of housing with care in the Forest of Dean need to consider the specific challenges and opportunities that delivering housing with care in the Forest of Dean presents: The Forest of Dean has a population of roughly 85,9571 spread over an area of 226 square miles.2 The district takes its name from the Forest of Dean itself, which forms a large part of the district and is the largest landscape feature. As well as the forest, the main geographical influences are the Severn Estuary and the Wye Valley, all of which are natural boundaries but also barriers to development. The district is adjacent to Wales and the West Midlands. Although some parts are closest to Gloucester, other parts are closer to Bristol, Newport and Hereford. The Forest of Dean is made up of 27 wards.3 Appendix 1 provides a breakdown of ONS population data; current levels of domiciliary care funded by Gloucestershire County Council (GCC); residential/nursing care; extra care and supported living at ward level. The Forest of Dean Core Strategy (FoDCS) indicates that the majority of growth within the district is likely to be planned in and around Bristol, Newport and Cardiff.4 The regeneration of the four major towns; Cinderford, Coleford, Lydney and Newent, is central to the FoDCS.
    [Show full text]
  • South Gloucestershire Council Conservative Group
    COUNCIL SIZE SUBMISSION South Gloucestershire South Gloucestershire Council Conservative Group. February 2017 Overview of South Gloucestershire 1. South Gloucestershire is an affluent unitary authority on the North and East fringe of Bristol. South Gloucestershire Council (SGC) was formed in 1996 following the dissolution of Avon County Council and the merger of Northavon District and Kingswood Borough Councils. 2. South Gloucestershire has around 274,700 residents, 62% of which live in the immediate urban fringes of Bristol in areas including Kingswood, Filton, Staple Hill, Downend, Warmley and Bradley Stoke. 18% live in the market towns of Thornbury, Yate, and Chipping Sodbury. The remaining 20% live in rural Gloucestershire villages such as Marshfield, Pucklechurch, Hawkesbury Upton, Oldbury‐ on‐Severn, Alveston, and Charfield. 3. South Gloucestershire has lower than average unemployment (3.3% against an England average of 4.8% as of 2016), earns above average wages (average weekly full time wage of £574.20 against England average of £544.70), and has above average house prices (£235,000 against England average of £218,000)1. Deprivation 4. Despite high employment and economic outputs, there are pockets of deprivation in South Gloucestershire. Some communities suffer from low income, unemployment, social isolation, poor housing, low educational achievement, degraded environment, access to health services, or higher levels of crime than other neighbourhoods. These forms of deprivation are often linked and the relationship between them is so strong that we have identified 5 Priority Neighbourhoods which are categorised by the national Indices of Deprivation as amongst the 20% most deprived neighbourhoods in England and Wales. These are Cadbury Heath, Kingswood, Patchway, Staple Hill, and west and south Yate/Dodington.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest-Of-Campus-Bus-Travel-1920.Pdf
    Stagecoach Routes Continued Gloucestershire College 746 From Huntley, Mitcheldean & Drybrook Boxbush Manor House 07:51 Cinderford GlosCol 16:35 Travel to our Forest of Dean Campus Huntley White Horse 08:00 Drybrook Cross 16:43 Huntley Sawmill 08:02 Mitcheldean Dunstone Place 16:51 2019/20 Mitcheldean Lamb 08:12 Huntley Red Lion 17:02 Bus Timetables and Pricing Information Mitcheldean Dean Magna School 08:15 Churcham Bulley Lane 17:06 Drybrook Cross 08:25 Gloucester Transport Hub 17:20 Cinderford GlosCol 08:40 Michaels Travel Route Michaels Travel ROUTE 1—St Briavels AM PM St Briavels, playing fields bus stop 07:55 17:00 Clearwell, Village Hall 08:02 16:53 Sling Crossroads 08:07 16:48 Bream School 08:15 16:40 Parkend, The Woodman Inn 08:20 16:35 Cinderford Campus, Gloscol 08:35 16:20 Passes for this route must be bought in advance from Student Services. A full year pass costs £500. This can be paid via cash/card in Student Services. You can also set up a Direct Debit. A £100 deposit will be taken to secure the bus pass, We are pleased to announce that for the 2019/20 Academic Year, Stagecoach have agreed and then 8 monthly payments (October-May) of £50. to cover the majority of the routes from the Forest Of Dean and surrounding areas to our Forest of Dean Campus in Cinderford. Questions? This means that our students will benefit from the generous discounted rates that students can access with Stagecoach. If you have any queries or questions regarding transport to the Cinderford Campus or the funding available, please contact Student Services.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Gloucester
    SHEET 4, MAP 4 Proposed electoral division boundaries in the City of Gloucester A D 4 R 1 7 Y COOMBE HILL WARD R LONGLEVENS ED U 0 B 4 Playing Field LONGFORD CP A S (33) E MAISEMORE CP K W B THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND E LONGLEVENS WARD 4 T 2 1 5 h) ESTCO Viaduct itc URT D ROAD ELECTORAL REVIEW OF GLOUCESTERSHIRE m Over Farm ha ck Do r ( R ve iv y e Tw Over r r e D S iv D e R A A Draft recommendations for electoral division boundaries v e O O Civil Service r Playing Field n R R Y Sports Club (E S as ' A M D L t W in the County of Gloucestershire May 2011 C L h O a A 'S nn H Sports Ground e W l AN S ) S E G O D Sheet 4 of 6 Archdeacon Meadow N St Oswalds Park T I S K Ham ) V l iad AD e uct N RO A 40 n SDOW n LAN The B a Rugby Ground KINGSHOLM AND WOTTON ED 4215 h Town Ham D Park C E This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of t N s M e (32) A the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Scale : 1cm = 0.07000 km KINGSHOLM R High School W K ( ST S ARK R For Girls n t C T M O Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathology Van Route Information
    Cotswold Early Location Location Depart Comments Start CGH 1000 Depart 1030 Depart 1040 if not (1005) going to Witney Windrush Health Centre Witney 1100 Lechlade Surgery 1125 Hilary Cottage Surgery, Fairford 1137 Westwood Surgery Northleach 1205 Moore Health Centre BOW 1218 George Moore Clinic BOW 1223 Well Lane Surgery Stow 1237 North Cotswolds Hospital MIM 1247 White House Surgery MIM 1252 Mann Cottage MIM 1255 Chipping Campden Surgery 1315 Barn Close MP Broadway 1330 Arrive CGH 1405 Finish 1415 Cotswold Late Location Location Depart Comments Start Time 1345 Depart CGH 1400 Abbey Medical Practice Evesham 1440 Merstow Green 1445 Riverside Surgery 1455 CGH 1530-1540 Westwood Surgery Northleach 1620 Moore Health Centre BOW 1635 Well Lane Surgery Stow 1655 North Cotswolds Hospital MIM 1705 White House Surgery M-in-M 1710 Mann Cottage MIM 1715 Chipping Campden Surgery 1735 Barn Close MP Broadway 1750 Winchcombe MP 1805 Cleeve Hill Nursing Home Winchcombe 1815 Arrive CGH 1830 Finish 1845 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT PHOTOCOPYING PROHIBITED Visor Route Information- GS DR 2016 Version: 3.30 Issued: 20th February 2019 Cirencester Early Location Location Depart Comments Start 1015 CGH – Pathology Reception 1030 Cirencester Hospital 1100-1115 Collect post & sort for GPs Tetbury Hospital 1145 Tetbury Surgery (Romney House) 1155 Cirencester Hospital 1220 Phoenix Surgery 1230 1,The Avenue, Cirencester 1240 1,St Peter's Rd., Cirencester 1250 The Park Surgery 1300 Rendcomb Surgery 1315 Sixways Surgery 1335 Arrive CGH 1345 Finish 1400 Cirencester Late Location
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Collision Course?
    Report Electoral Collision Course? The Boundaries and the Register After May 2015 Lewis Baston ELECTORAL COLLISION COURSE? THE BOUNDARIES AND THE REGISTER AFTER MAY 2015 Lewis Baston First published in Great Britain in 2014 by The Constitution Society Top Floor, 61 Petty France London SW1H 9EU www.consoc.org.uk © The Constitution Society ISBN: 978-0-9928904-2-1 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. ELECTORAL COLLISION COURSE? 3 Contents About the Author 5 Summary 6 PART 1 The Rules for Drawing Boundaries 11 PART 2 Individual Electoral Registration (IER) 21 PART 3 The Crisis of 2015–20 36 PART 4 How to Draw Fair Constituency Boundaries Despite Individual Electoral Registration 46 The Timing of Boundary Reviews 68 Conclusion: A Threat and An Opportunity 71 ELECTORAL COLLISION COURSE? 5 About the Author Lewis Baston is a psephologist, biographer and historian, as well as being a research fellow of Democratic Audit. From 2003 to 2010 he was Director of Research at the Electoral Reform Society. He is a frequent commentator for outlets such as Progress, the Fabians and Conservative Home (as well as various BBC programmes) and author of several books of history and electoral studies. 6 ELECTORAL COLLISION COURSE? Summary A common complaint about the constitutional reform programme pursued by the Labour governments of 1997– 2010 was that it was disjointed.
    [Show full text]