Support for the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics 5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Support for the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics 5 Making Mathematics Count ∑≠% # ∞ ≥÷() Making Mathematics The Report of Professor Adrian Smith Count The Report of Professor Adrian Smith’s Inquiry into Post-14 Mathematics Education February 2004 Making Mathematics Count The report of Professor Adrian Smith’s Inquiry into Post-14 Mathematics Education February 2004 Printed by The Stationery Office Limited 2/04 937764 CONTENTS Page Foreword V Executive Summary 1 Purpose of the post-14 mathematics education inquiry 1 Overview of the report 3 The importance of mathematics 3 Supply of teachers of mathematics 4 Current mathematics pathways 6 Action on current and future pathways 6 Support for the teaching and learning of mathematics 8 National and regional support infrastructure 9 Conclusion 9 Chapter 1 The Importance of Mathematics 11 Mathematics for its own sake 11 Mathematics for the knowledge economy 11 Mathematics for science, technology and engineering 11 Mathematics for the workplace 12 Mathematics for the citizen 13 Increasing mathematical skills 13 This report 14 The special position of mathematics 14 Territorial responsibilities 15 Government departments and agencies 15 The mathematics education community 16 Chapter 2 The Supply of Teachers of Mathematics 19 The need for qualified teachers of mathematics 19 Teacher shortages and their effect on students’ performance 20 The shortfall of specialist mathematics teachers in secondary schools 22 The shortfall of specialist mathematics teachers in colleges 28 The shortfall of ITT mathematics trainers 28 Teacher vacancies 30 Teacher age-profiles and forecasts of future supply requirements 32 The decline in post-16 take up of mathematics 34 Teacher recruitment 36 i Teachers’ Remuneration 49 A summary of additional comments on teacher supply in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland 50 Chapter 3 Current Mathematics Pathways 53 The National Curriculum (pre-16) 53 The curriculum post-16 55 Mathematics qualifications: current progression routes within mathematics 56 A summary of structures, qualifications and developments in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland 71 Chapter 4 Action on Current and Future Mathematics Pathways 81 The Working Group on 14-19 Curriculum and Qualifications Reform 81 Current concerns over GCSE Mathematics in England 82 Concerns over key skills and Application of Number (AoN): FSMQs and AS Use of Mathematics 87 Concerns relating to GCE Mathematics 92 Concerns with Adult Numeracy 95 Possible Future Pathway Models for Mathematics 14-19 96 Chapter 5 Support for the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics 105 Continuing Professional Development (CPD) for teachers of mathematics) 105 The need for subject-specific CPD 107 The ACME report 109 CPD content and delivery 112 Key requirements and tasks of a support infrastructure 120 Chapter 6 National and Regional Support Infrastructure 127 Existing and potential providers, networks and initiatives 127 The role of the Numeracy and Key Stage 3 Strategies 128 The role of Higher Education in supporting Schools and Colleges 131 The role of Specialist Schools 135 The role of voluntary initiatives 137 Support of teachers of adult numeracy 141 Evaluation and dissemination of research in mathematics education 141 ii Remit and responsibilities of the national and regional centres 142 Funding requirements for the NCETM and the RMCs 144 The governance of the NCETM and the RMCs 147 The location and management of the NCETM and the RMCs 150 Appendix 1 List of Recommendations by Chapter 151 Appendix 2 Background, Terms of Reference and Steering Group 163 Appendix 3 Glossary 165 Appendix 4 National Qualifications Framework 171 iii iv FOREWORD The Rt. Hon. Charles Clarke, MP Secretary of State for Education and Skills Sanctuary Building Great Smith Street London SW1P 3BT February 2004 I am pleased to present to you the report of the Post-14 Mathematics Inquiry. I am grateful to have been given the opportunity to lead this Inquiry and would like to thank the many organisations and individuals who provided me with such a wealth of invaluable facts, figures, opinions and advice. I would particularly like to thank the members of my Steering Group for their patient support and wise counsel; my expert advisers for their tutorial advice, and my secretariat for their professional support. All have contributed enormously to my report. In carrying out this UK Inquiry, I have been mindful of the fact that responsibility for mathematics education is devolved to all three devolved administrations. The degree of common ground with England varies markedly across the territories of the UK, as do territorial perceptions of the problems they face regarding mathematics education. I should therefore make clear that, for the most part, my analyses and recommendations refer more directly to England than to Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. Nevertheless, I hope that many elements of the report will be useful to all the devolved administrations. Mathematics is of central importance to modern society. It provides the language and analytical tools underpinning much of our scientific and industrial research and development. Mathematical concepts, models and techniques are also key to many vital areas of the knowledge economy, including the finance and ICT industries. Mathematics is crucially important, too, for the employment opportunities and achievements of individual citizens. The Inquiry has therefore found it deeply disturbing that so many important stakeholders believe there to be a crisis in the teaching and learning of mathematics in England. There are three major areas of concern. First, we have a curriculum and qualifications framework that fails to meet the mathematical requirements of learners, fails to meet the needs and expectations of higher education and employers and fails to motivate and encourage sufficient numbers of young people to continue with the study of mathematics post-16. Secondly, we have a serious shortage of specialist mathematics teachers in schools and colleges and this is having an adverse effect on pupils’ learning experiences. v Thirdly, there is a lack of support infrastructure, both at national and local levels, to provide continuing professional development and resources, including ICT, in support of excellence in the teaching and learning of mathematics. My report makes a number of recommendations for addressing these problems. Some, I believe, can be implemented straightaway and would produce immediate improvements. Others require more radical, longer-term changes. So far as the curriculum and qualifications framework is concerned, it is timely that the publication of the report of this Inquiry follows so closely after the publication of the Interim Report of the Working Group on 14-19 Curriculum and Qualifications Reform. The Post-14 Mathematics Inquiry strongly welcomes and endorses the broad philosophy of the Working Group’s proposals. I believe that the proposals I make in this report for designing new pathways for mathematics are fully compatible with the Working Group’s proposals for the overall 14-19 framework. So far as support for the teaching and learning of mathematics is concerned, the Inquiry believes it to be vital that we provide teachers of mathematics in schools and colleges with greatly enhanced resources and with sustained access to professional support and development. Specifically, I propose a model of national and local infrastructure that I believe will enhance the mathematics teaching environment, nurture and support individual teachers of mathematics and encourage collectively in mathematics departments in schools and colleges a renewed sense of confidence and professionalism. The implementation of the recommendations set out in this report will begin the process of averting the crisis in mathematics education. I commend these recommendations to you. I am also copying this letter to Jane Davidson in Wales, Jane Kennedy in Northern Ireland and Peter Peacock in Scotland. Professor Adrian Smith, FRS vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose of the Inquiry 0.1 At the time of Budget 2001, the Government commissioned a review into the supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematical skills. In the context of the Government’s strategy for improving the UK’s productivity and innovation performance, this reflected a concern that the supply of scientists and engineers should not constrain the UK’s future research and development and innovation capability. The review was carried out for the Chancellor of the Exchequer by Sir Gareth Roberts, who published his report, SET for Success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematical skills, in April, 2002.1 0.2 The Roberts report examined the supply of science and engineering skills in the UK in the specific contexts of the biological sciences, the physical sciences, engineering, mathematics and computer science. It presented a number of findings relating to the difficulties faced by employers in recruiting appropriately qualified scientists and engineers and raised a number of issues about the development of science and engineering skills in schools, colleges and higher education. 0.3 The report noted that although, relative to many other countries, the UK has a large and growing number of young people studying science and engineering, this overall growth has masked a decline in the numbers studying the physical sciences, engineering and mathematics. For example, the report drew attention to the drop during the 1990s of nearly 10 per cent in the numbers taking A-level
Recommended publications
  • Music Learning and Mathematics Achievement: a Real-World Study in English Primary Schools
    Music Learning and Mathematics Achievement: A Real-World Study in English Primary Schools Edel Marie Sanders Supervisor: Dr Linda Hargreaves This final thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Faculty of Education University of Cambridge October 2018 Music Learning and Mathematics Achievement: A Real-World Study in English Primary Schools Edel Marie Sanders Abstract This study examines the potential for music education to enhance children’s mathematical achievement and understanding. Psychological and neuroscientific research on the relationship between music and mathematics has grown considerably in recent years. Much of this, however, has been laboratory-based, short-term or small-scale research. The present study contributes to the literature by focusing on specific musical and mathematical elements, working principally through the medium of singing and setting the study in five primary schools over a full school year. Nearly 200 children aged seven to eight years, in six school classes, experienced structured weekly music lessons, congruent with English National Curriculum objectives for music but with specific foci. The quasi-experimental design employed two independent variable categories: musical focus (form, pitch relationships or rhythm) and mathematical teaching emphasis (implicit or explicit). In all other respects, lesson content was kept as constant as possible. Pretests and posttests in standardised behavioural measures of musical, spatial and mathematical thinking were administered to all children. Statistical analyses (two-way mixed ANOVAs) of student scores in these tests reveal positive significant gains in most comparisons over normative progress in mathematics for all musical emphases and both pedagogical conditions with slightly greater effects in the mathematically explicit lessons.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education Academy Subject Centres to Close
    Media release 16 November 2010 For immediate release Higher Education Academy Subject Centres to Close The Council for the Mathematical Sciences (CMS) and the Heads of Departments of Mathematical Sciences (HoDoMS) note with regret the decision, recently announced by the Chief Executive of the Higher Education Academy (HEA) Craig Mahoney, to close the HEA's 24 Subject Centres, and in particular the Subject Centre for Mathematics, Statistics and Operational Research (MSOR). During its existence the MSOR Subject Centre has been and continues to be recognised by the university mathematics, statistics and operational research community as an extremely valuable contributor to improving teaching and the student experience. Widely appreciated initiatives have included the new lecturer course, postgraduate tutor training days and dissemination of good practice through the periodical MSOR Connections, and an annual conference. The CMS and HoDoMS support the HEA's commitment to maintaining its subject and discipline level work and would welcome the opportunity to work with the HEA to shape its subject level services in its new structure. The CMS and HoDoMS also hope that the HEA will use senior figures from within the mathematical sciences community to help it deliver its future agenda in MSOR. Dr Neil Challis, Chair of the MSOR Advisory Panel, commented, “We are sad to hear of the loss of the MSOR Subject Centre, and very anxious to understand what discipline focused support can be saved”. Professor Frank Kelly FRS, Chair of the Council for the Mathematical Sciences, added that, “The Council for the Mathematical Sciences, representing the main UK mathematical societies, regrets the loss of the Subject Centre for Mathematics, Statistics and Operational Research, which had been responsible for widely appreciated initiatives such as the new lecturer course.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Mathematics for All Learners
    Engaging mathematics for all learners PHOTO REDACTED DUE TO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS OR OTHER LEGAL ISSUES 2 Engaging mathematics for all learners Contents Foreword . .3 Introduction . .5 What are you trying to achieve? . .6 How will you organise learning? . .8 Planning a compelling learning experience 8 Getting started – what are rich mathematical activities? 8 Some strategies for devising and working with rich mathematical activities 9 Finding rich contexts for mathematics 13 How will you know that you are achieving your aims? . .20 Case studies . .22 1: Every Child Matters – using recreational activities to engage learners 22 2: Every Child Matters – working inclusively with all ability groups 23 3: Historical and cultural roots of mathematics – understanding numbers 24 4: Historical and cultural roots of mathematics – the golden ratio 26 5: Modelling with mathematics 27 6: Mathematics in society – ‘number sense’ 28 7: Mathematics in society – technology and the environment 29 8: Mathematics across the curriculum – performing arts 31 9: Mathematics across the curriculum – STEM 32 10: Mathematics across the curriculum – STEM and PE 33 11: Mathematics and curriculum dimensions – healthy lifestyles 34 12: Mathematics and curriculum dimensions – technology and the media 34 13: Mathematics and curriculum dimensions – creativity and critical thinking 35 14: Using timetable opportunities for engaging mathematical activities 1 36 15: Using timetable opportunities for engaging mathematical activities 2 37 16: Working together to trial engaging mathematical activities (Bowland maths)38 17: Working together to introduce rich tasks into the mathematics curriculum for all learners 39 Working together to engage learners . .40 Making it happen . .44 Resources . .46 Acknowledgements .
    [Show full text]
  • Popularising Mathematics
    Popularising Mathematics Philipp Legner August 2013 Abstract Mathematics has countless applications in science, engineering and technology, yet school mathematics is one of the most unpopular subjects, perceived as difficult, boring and not useful in life. ‘Popularisation’ projects can help bridge this gap, by showing how exciting, applicable and beautiful mathematics is. Some popularisation projects focus on telling the wider public about mathematics, including its history, philosophy and applications; other projects encourage you to actively do mathematics and discover surprising relationships and beautiful results using mathematical reasoning and thinking. In this report I will develop a framework to classify and evaluate popularisation, and analyse a wide range of existing projects – ranging from competitions to websites, movies, exhibitions, books and workshops. I also reflect upon my personal experiences in designing popularisation activities. I would like to thank Professor Dave Pratt for his advise while writing this report. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part 1: A Framework for Mathematics Popularisation The Value of Mathematics ........................................................................... 2 Defining Mathematics Popularisation ...................................................... 4 Designing Mathematics Popularisation ................................................... 8 Evaluating Popularisation Projects ............................................................ 11 Part 2: Case Studies of Popularisation Projects
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Teaching Mathematics
    TEACHING MATHEMATICS IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOL 00_CHAMBERS_FM.indd 1 23/01/2019 5:17:30 PM DEVELOPING AS A REFLECTIVE SECONDARY TEACHER SERIES The core textbooks in this series provide practical guidance and support to student teachers through their training and beyond. These comprehensive guides help trainee teachers develop a more reflective and critical approach to their own practice. The series offers students: • An introduction to national subject frameworks • Support on all aspects of subject teaching, including planning creative lessons, how to improve classroom performance, classroom management, differentiation and teaching strategies • Examples of good practice and teacher commentaries • A research-based section demonstrating M-level work • Critical and analytical reflection on practice They are essential reading for student teachers following school-based or university- based routes into teaching. Reflective Teaching and Learning in the Secondary School, second edition Edited by Sue Dymoke Teaching English Carol Evans, Alyson Midgley, Phil Rigby, Lynne Warham and Peter Woolnough Teaching Computing, second edition Carl Simmons and Claire Hawkins Teaching History Ian Phillips Teaching Science Tony Liversidge, Matt Cochrane, Bernie Kerfoot and Judith Thomas 00_CHAMBERS_FM.indd 2 23/01/2019 5:17:31 PM THIRD EDITION TEACHING MATHEMATICS IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOL PAUL CHAMBERS AND ROBERT TIMLIN 00_CHAMBERS_FM.indd 3 23/01/2019 5:17:31 PM SAGE Publications Ltd © Paul Chambers and Robert Timlin 2019 1 Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road First edition
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Specific About Research in Adult Numeracy and Mathematics Education?
    What is specific about research in adult numeracy and mathematics education? Diana Coben King’s College London, UK <[email protected]> Abstract After decades of neglect, adult numeracy and mathematics education are coming to be recognised as worthy of serious research but the area is beset by conceptual difficulties. Adult numeracy and mathematics may at last be ‘on the educational research map’, but where exactly are they on the map? This article explores the question of what is specific about research in adult numeracy and mathematics education. It reviews ways of conceptualising adult numeracy and mathematics education for research purposes and considers the implications of these conceptualisations for research and for the development of the field. Key words: conceptualisations, adult numeracy, mathematics education, policy, research, development frameworks Introduction In the latest International Handbook of Research on Mathematics Education, it is suggested that: • ….adult mathematics teaching and learning deserve attention in their own right; • practice and research in adult mathematics education demand a broad conception of mathematics that is not limited to specialized mathematics…; • there is a coalition of interests in the field across a wide spectrum of related or contributing disciplines; • there is a recognition that research must be closely linked with practice in a field where development and improvement in practice have priority status; and • the community of researchers is truly international... (FitzSimons, Coben, & O'Donoghue, 2003, p.117) The inclusion of an adult-focussed chapter in the International Handbook attests to the growing international recognition of the importance of research and development in this area. While most research about mathematics education focuses on children (Dossey, 1992), adult mathematics teaching and learning both deserve, and are beginning to receive attention in their own right.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Differences in Arithmetic: Implications for Psychology, Neuroscience, and Education/Ann Dowker
    Individual Differences in Arithmetic Standards in numeracy are a constant concern to educational policy makers. However, why are differences in arithmetical performance so marked? In Individual Differences in Arithmetic, Ann Dowker seeks to provide a better understanding of why these differences in ability exist, encouraging a more informed approach to tackling numeracy difficulties. This book reviews existing research by the author and by others on the subject of arithmetical ability and presents strong evidence to support a componential view of arithmetic. Focusing primarily on children, but including discussion of arithmetical cognition in healthy adult and neuro-psychological patients, each of the central components of arithmetic is covered. Within this volume, findings from developmental, educational, cognitive and neuropsychological studies are integrated in a unique approach. This book covers subjects such as: • Counting and the importance of individual differences. • Arithmetic facts, procedures and different forms of memory. • Causes of, and interventions with, mathematical difficulties. • The effects of culture, language and experience. The educational implications of these findings are discussed in detail, revealing original insights that will be of great interest to those studying or researching in the areas of education, neuroscience and developmental and cognitive psychology. Ann Dowker is a University Research Lecturer in the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford. Individual Differences in Arithmetic
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching and Learning Geometry 11-19 Report of a Royal Society / Joint Mathematical Council Working Group Teaching and Learning Geometry 11-19
    JMC Teaching and learning geometry 11-19 Report of a Royal Society / Joint Mathematical Council working group Teaching and learning geometry 11-19 Contents page Preparation of this report v Chairman’s preface vii Summary xi 1 Introduction 1 2 Geometry and its teaching and learning 3 3 The place of geometry in the curriculum 5 4 The 11-16 curriculum 7 5 The development of the curriculum 9 6 Status and allocation of time for geometry 13 7 Geometry 16-19 15 8 The role of assessment 17 9 Teaching of geometry 19 10 Improving the take up of mathematics 21 11 Conclusion 23 12 References and glossary 25 Contents (continued) Appendix 1 The working group 27 Appendix 2 National and international contexts for mathematics 31 Appendix 3 Some recent government initiatives in education 35 Appendix 4 Expectations of geometry in education 37 Appendix 5 Geometry in history and society 41 Appendix 6 Geometry in the current 11-16 curriculum 45 Appendix 7 Geometry in the Key Stage 3 mathematics strategy 49 Appendix 8 Spatial thinking and visualisation 55 Appendix 9 Proof – ‘why and what?’ 57 Appendix 10 Examples of applications of geometry 65 Appendix 11 3-dimensional geometry 69 Appendix 12 Frameworks for developing schemes of work for the curriculum 75 Appendix 13 Integrated approaches to geometry teaching 81 Appendix 14 Bibliography and guide to resources 87 © The Royal Society 2001 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: Education Manager The Royal Society 6 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG Preparation of this report This report has been endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society and the JMC.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics: Shaping Australia Proceedings of the Eighteenth Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc
    Proceedings of the Eighteenth Biennial Conference of The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc. 15–19 January 2001 Australian National University, Canberra ACT Mathematics: Shaping Australia Proceedings of the Eighteenth Biennial Conference of The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc. © The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc. 2001 ISBN 1 875900 47 0 Published by The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc. GPO Box 1729 Adelaide South Australia 5001 Telephone (08) 8363 0288 Facsimile (08) 8362 9288 Email [email protected] Internet http://www.aamt.edu.au All papers in these proceedings were subject to a blind review process. Mathematics: Shaping Australia Contents PAPERS No More (Red-Pen) Marking!............................................................................................ 8 Tony Allan Learning about Learning in Mathematics ...................................................................... 15 Anna Austin Mathematics Education in Thailand: From Kindergarten to Graphics Calculators .................................................................. 29 Nittayaporn Bunyasiri and Peter Jones Unsolved Problems and the Mathematics Challenge for Young Australians............. 38 John Dowsey and Mike Newman I Can Do Maths Too — Count Me In! ............................................................................. 45 Rhonda Faragher Reading the World with Math: Goals for a Criticalmathematical Literacy Curriculum.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3 Research Reports Ead - Kou
    Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Prague, Czech Republic July 16-21, 2006 Volume 3 Research Reports Ead - Kou Editors: Jarmila Novotná Hana Moraová, Magdalena Krátká, Naďa Stehlíková Charles University in Prague Faculty of Education Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Volume 3 Editors Jarmila Novotná Hana Moraová Magdalena Krátká Naďa Stehlíková Charles University in Prague Faculty of Education Czech Republic The Proceedings are also available on CD-ROM Copyright © 2006 left to the authors All rights reserved ISSN 0771-100X Logo: Ivan Špirk Cover Design: Jarmila Novotná & Ivan Špirk Printing: Atelier Guimaec, s.r.o 3-ii PME30 — 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 3 Research Reports Eade, Frank & Dickinson, Paul 3-1 Exploring realistic mathematics education in English schools Ebersbach, Mirjam & Resing, Wilma C. M. 3-9 Reasoning about non-linearity in 6- to 9-year-olds: the role of task presentation Eichler, Andreas 3-17 Teachers, classroom, students – A holistic view on beliefs concerning the educational practice Elia, Iliada & Gagatsis, Athanasios 3-25 The effects of different modes of representation on problem solving: Two experimental programs Ell, Fiona 3-33 Can moderate hermeneutics help us to understand learning and teaching in the mathematics classroom? Evans, Jeff & Zan, Rosetta 3-41 Sociocultural approaches to emotions in mathematics education: Initial comparisons Falkenberg, Thomas 3-49 Moral
    [Show full text]
  • LMS Annual Review 2012-2013
    LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY ADVANCING MATHEMATICS ANNUAL REVIEW 2012-2013 WELCOME FROM THE PRESIDENT Over the past year the Society has developed the foundations of its future strategy as well as continuing to engage with government, industry, academia, and the wider STEM community. We are committed to meeting the demands both of our members and of the mathematical sciences as a whole, and to do About the LMS this as well as possible we have been working to formulate strategic priorities to guide us as we The London Mathematical Society undertake our various activities: communicating (LMS), founded in 1865, is the UK’s and advancing mathematical knowledge, learned society for mathematics. promoting research in all areas of mathematics, The Society has as its purpose publicising its benefits, and at the same time the advancement, dissemination ensuring the long-term sustainability of the and promotion of mathematical mathematical research community. knowledge in the UK and worldwide. We have a vital role as an influential independent The Society’s main activities voice in issues concerning both research and include publishing journals and education, with a new landscape for higher education and the development books, providing grants to support of a new National Curriculum dominating the agenda. Contributing the mathematics and organising scientific expertise of our members in these areas will always enhance the Society’s meetings and lectures. The Society reputation. The Deloitte report on the economic benefits of research in the also engages with government mathematical sciences, published jointly by the Council for the Mathematical Sciences (CMS) and EPSRC, is a seminal document that has been well and other national policy makers received by government, industry, academia and the wider mathematical on mathematics education and sciences community.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Teach Mathematics in the Secondary School: a Companion to School Experience / Edited by Sue Johnston-Wilder...[Et Al.]
    LEARNING TO TEACH MATHEMATICS IN THE SECONDARY SCHOOL What is the role of mathematics in the secondary classroom? What is expected of a would-be maths teacher? How is mathematics best taught and learnt? Learning to Teach Mathematics in the Secondary School combines theory and practice to present a broad introduction to the opportunities and challenges of teaching mathematics in modern secondary school classrooms. Written specifically with the new and student teacher in mind, the book covers a wide range of issues related to the teaching of math- ematics, including: I the role of ICT I planning mathematics lessons I Assessment for LearningNEW I including special-needs pupils I using mathematics in contextNEW I teaching mathematics post-16 I communicating mathematically I professional development. Already a major text for many university teaching courses, this fully revised third edition takes into account new developments in the National Curriculum as well as recent changes to the standards for Qualified Teacher Status. Featuring two brand new chapters, a glossary of useful terms, addresses for resources and organisations, and tasks designed to prompt critical reflection and support thinking and writing at Masters level, this book will help you make the most of school experience, during your training, your NQT year and beyond. Designed for use as a core textbook, this new edition of Learning to Teach Mathematics in the Secondary School provides essential guidance and advice for all trainee and practising teachers of secondary mathematics. Sue Johnston-Wilder is Associate Professor at the University of Warwick; she works with PGCE students and in-service teachers in the West Midlands.
    [Show full text]