DOCSLIB.ORG

The Amphibian Tree of Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Amphibian Tree of Life THE AMPHIBIAN TREE OF LIFE DARREL R. FROST,1 TARAN GRANT,1,4 JULIAÂ N FAIVOVICH,1,4 RAOUL H. BAIN,1,2 ALEXANDER HAAS,5 CEÂ LIO F.B. HADDAD,6 RAFAEL O. DE SAÂ ,7 ALAN CHANNING,8 MARK WILKINSON,9 STEPHEN C. DONNELLAN,10 CHRISTOPHER J. RAXWORTHY,1 JONATHAN A. CAMPBELL,11 BORIS L. BLOTTO,12 PAUL MOLER,13 ROBERT C. DREWES,14 RONALD A. NUSSBAUM,15 JOHN D. LYNCH,16 DAVID M. GREEN,17 AND WARD C. WHEELER3 1Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology),2Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, and 3Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History (DRF: [email protected]; TG: [email protected]; JF: [email protected]; RHB: [email protected]; CJR: [email protected]; WCW: [email protected]); 4Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; 5Biocenter Grindel and Zoological Museum Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany ([email protected]); 6Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiocieÃncias, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Caixa Postal 199, 13506-900 Rio Claro, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]); 7Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173-0001 ([email protected]); 8Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa ([email protected]); 9Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK ([email protected]); 10South Australia Museum, Evolutionary Biology Unit, North Terrace, Adelaide 5000, South Australia ([email protected]); 11Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, TX 76019-0001 ([email protected]); 12Division HerpetologõÂa, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ``Bernardino Rivadavia'', Angel Gallardo 470, 1405 Buenos Aires, Argentina ([email protected]); 13Wildlife Research Laboratory, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 4005 South Main Street, Gainesville, FL 32601-9075 ([email protected]); 14Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, 875 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-3009 ([email protected]); 15Museum of Zoology and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079 ([email protected]); 16Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, BogotaÂ, Colombia ([email protected]); 17Redpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2K6, Canada ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 297, 370 pp., 71 ®gures, 5 tables, 7 appendices Issued March 15, 2006 Copyright q American Museum of Natural History 2006 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................... 8 Introduction ................................................................... 11 Materials and Methods ......................................................... 13 Conventions and Abbreviations ................................................ 13 General Analytical Approach: Theoretical Considerations ......................... 13 Taxon Sampling ............................................................. 14 Character Sampling .......................................................... 15 Laboratory Protocols ......................................................... 17 Sequence Preanalysis: Heuristic Error Checking ................................. 17 Molecular Sequence Formatting ............................................... 17 Analytical Strategy .......................................................... 18 Review of Current Taxonomy, the Questions, and Taxon Sampling .................. 22 Comparability of Systematic Studies ........................................... 22 Amphibia ................................................................... 23 Gymnophiona ............................................................... 24 Rhinatrematidae ........................................................... 25 Ichthyophiidae and Uraeotyphlidae .......................................... 25 Scolecomorphidae ......................................................... 25 Typhlonectidae ............................................................ 25 ``Caeciliidae'' ............................................................. 25 Caudata .................................................................... 26 Sirenidae ................................................................. 26 Hynobiidae ............................................................... 28 Cryptobranchidae .......................................................... 28 Proteidae ................................................................. 28 Rhyacotritonidae .......................................................... 30 Amphiumidae ............................................................. 30 Plethodontidae ............................................................ 30 Salamandridae ............................................................ 36 Dicamptodontidae ......................................................... 37 Ambystomatidae .......................................................... 37 Anura ...................................................................... 38 ``Primitive'' Frogs ........................................................... 41 Ascaphidae ............................................................... 41 Leiopelmatidae ............................................................ 41 Discoglossidae and Bombinatoridae .......................................... 44 ``Transitional'' Frogs ......................................................... 45 Pipoidea .................................................................. 46 Rhinophrynidae ........................................................... 47 Pipidae ................................................................... 47 Pelobatoidea .............................................................. 48 Pelobatidae and Scaphiopodidae ............................................. 49 Pelodytidae ............................................................... 49 Megophryidae ............................................................. 49 ``Advanced'' FrogsÐNeobatrachia ............................................. 50 ``Hyloidea'' ................................................................. 52 Heleophrynidae ........................................................... 52 Sooglossidae and Nasikabatrachidae ......................................... 53 Limnodynastidae, Myobatrachidae, and Rheobatrachidae ....................... 53 ``Leptodactylidae'' ......................................................... 56 ``Ceratophryinae'' ......................................................... 57 ``Cycloramphinae'' ........................................................ 59 3 4 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 297 Eleutherodactylinae ........................................................ 60 Leptodactylinae ........................................................... 61 ``Telmatobiinae'' .......................................................... 61 ``Hemiphractinae'' ......................................................... 62 Brachycephalidae .......................................................... 63 Rhinodermatidae .......................................................... 63 Dendrobatidae ............................................................. 63 Allophrynidae ............................................................. 64 Centrolenidae ............................................................. 64 Hylidae .................................................................. 64 Hylinae .................................................................. 64 Pelodryadinae ............................................................. 65 Phyllomedusinae .......................................................... 65 Bufonidae ................................................................ 67 Ranoidea ................................................................... 70 Arthroleptidae, Astylosternidae, and Hyperoliidae ............................. 72 Arthroleptidae ............................................................. 72 Astylosternidae ............................................................ 72 Hyperoliidae .............................................................. 74 Hemisotidae .............................................................. 74 Microhylidae .............................................................. 75 Scaphiophyrninae .......................................................... 77 Asterophryinae and Genyophryninae ......................................... 77 Brevicipitinae ............................................................. 78 Cophylinae ............................................................... 78 Dyscophinae .............................................................. 79 Melanobatrachinae ......................................................... 79 Microhylinae .............................................................. 80 Phrynomerinae ............................................................ 80 ``Ranidae'' ................................................................ 81 Ceratobatrachinae .......................................................... 81 Conrauinae ............................................................... 83 Dicroglossinae ...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strongylopus Hymenopus (Boulenger, 1920) (Anura: Pyxicephalidae)
    A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AMIETIA VERTEBRALIS (HEWITT, 1927) AND STRONGYLOPUS HYMENOPUS (BOULENGER, 1920) (ANURA: PYXICEPHALIDAE) Jeanne Berkeljon A dissertation submitted in partial fuIJilment of the requirementsfor the degree of Master of Environmental Science North- West University (Potchefitroom campus) Supervisor: Prof Louis du Preez (North-West University) Co-supervisor: Dr Michael Cunningham (University of the Free State) November 2007 Walk away quietly in any direction and taste the fieedom of the mountaineer... Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares drop ofSlike autumn leaves. John Muir (1838 - 1914) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VIII 1.1 Background 1 1.2 A review of the literature 3 1.2.2 Taxonomic history of the Aquatic River Frog, Amietia vertebralis 3 1.2.3 Taxonomic history of the Berg Stream Frog, 7 Strongylopus hymenopus 7 1.3 Research aims and objectives 9 2.1 Study area 2.1.1 Lesotho and the Drakensberg Mountains 2.2 Species Description 2.2.1 Description of the Aquatic River Frog, Amietia vertebralis 2.2.2 Description of the Berg Stream Frog, Strongylopus hymenopus 2.3 Species Distribution 2.3.1 Distribution of Amietia vertebralis 2.3.2 Distribution of Strongylopus hymenopus 2.4 Conservation status 2.5 General Methods 2.5.1 Fieldwork 2.5.2 Morphometrics 2.5.3 Molecular analysis CHAPTER3 : MORPHOMETRICASSESSMENT OF AMETIA VERTEBRALIS AND STRONGYLOPUSHYMENOPUS 33 3.1 Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Amolops from Thailand (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae)
    ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE 23: 727–732 (2006) 2006 Zoological Society of Japan A New Species of Amolops from Thailand (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) Masafumi Matsui1* and Jarujin Nabhitabhata2 1Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan 2National Science Museum, Technopolis, Klong 5, Klongluang District, Pathun thani 12120, Thailand We describe a new species of torrent-dwelling ranid frog of the genus Amolops from western to peninsular Thailand. Amolops panhai, new species, differs from its congeners by the combination of: small body, males 31–34 mm, females 48–58 mm in snout-vent length; head narrower than long; tympanum distinct; vomerine teeth in short, oblique patches; first finger subequal to second; disc of first finger smaller than that of second, with circummarginal groove; no wide fringe of skin on third finger; toes fully webbed; outer metatarsal tubercle present; supratympanic fold present; dor- solateral fold indistinct; axillary gland present; horny spines on back, side of head and body, and chest absent; large tubercles on side of anus absent; glandular fold on ventral surface of tarsus absent; nuptial pad and paired gular pouches present in male; white band along the upper jaw extending to shoulder absent; larval dental formula 7(4-7)/3(1). This new species is the second anu- ran discovered which has a disjunct distribution around the Isthmus of Kra. Key words: Amolops, new species, Southeast Asia, tadpole, taxonomy, zoogeography Ranong), which we describe below as a new species. INTRODUCTION Oriental ranid frogs related to Amolops Cope, 1865 MATERIALS AND METHODS (sensu lato) are characterized by their peculiar larvae, which A field survey was conducted in western and peninsular Thai- inhabit mountain torrents using an abdominal, suctorial disk land between December 1995 and January 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • AMS112 1978-1979 Lowres Web
    --~--------~--------------------------------------------~~~~----------~-------------- - ~------------------------------ COVER: Paul Webber, technical officer in the Herpetology department searchers for reptiles and amphibians on a field trip for the Colo River Survey. Photo: John Fields!The Australian Museum. REPORT of THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM TRUST for the YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE , 1979 ST GOVERNMENT PRINTER, NEW SOUTH WALES-1980 D. WE ' G 70708K-1 CONTENTS Page Page Acknowledgements 4 Department of Palaeontology 36 The Australian Museum Trust 5 Department of Terrestrial Invertebrate Ecology 38 Lizard Island Research Station 5 Department of Vertebrate Ecology 38 Research Associates 6 Camden Haven Wildlife Refuge Study 39 Associates 6 Functional Anatomy Unit.. 40 National Photographic Index of Australian Director's Research Laboratory 40 Wildlife . 7 Materials Conservation Section 41 The Australian Museum Society 7 Education Section .. 47 Letter to the Premier 9 Exhibitions Department 52 Library 54 SCIENTIFIC DEPARTMENTS Photographic and Visual Aid Section 54 Department of Anthropology 13 PublicityJ Pu bl ications 55 Department of Arachnology 18 National Photographic Index of Australian Colo River Survey .. 19 Wildlife . 57 Lizard Island Research Station 59 Department of Entomology 20 The Australian Museum Society 61 Department of Herpetology 23 Appendix 1- Staff .. 62 Department of Ichthyology 24 Appendix 2-Donations 65 Department of Malacology 25 Appendix 3-Acknowledgements of Co- Department of Mammalogy 27 operation. 67 Department of Marine
    [Show full text]
  • BOA2.1 Caecilian Biology and Natural History.Key
    The Biology of Amphibians @ Agnes Scott College Mark Mandica Executive Director The Amphibian Foundation [email protected] 678 379 TOAD (8623) 2.1: Introduction to Caecilians Microcaecilia dermatophaga Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia There are more than 20 synapomorphies (shared characters) uniting the group Lissamphibia Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Integumen is Glandular Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Glandular Skin, with 2 main types of glands. Mucous Glands Aid in cutaneous respiration, reproduction, thermoregulation and defense. Granular Glands Secrete toxic and/or noxious compounds and aid in defense Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Pedicellate Teeth crown (dentine, with enamel covering) gum line suture (fibrous connective tissue, where tooth can break off) basal element (dentine) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Sacral Vertebrae Sacral Vertebrae Connects pelvic girdle to The spine. Amphibians have no more than one sacral vertebrae (caecilians have none) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Amphicoelus Vertebrae Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Opercular apparatus Unique to amphibians and Operculum part of the sound conducting mechanism Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Fat Bodies Surrounding Gonads Fat Bodies Insulate gonads Evolution of Amphibians † † † † Actinopterygian Coelacanth, Tetrapodomorpha †Amniota *Gerobatrachus (Ray-fin Fishes) Lungfish (stem-tetrapods) (Reptiles, Mammals)Lepospondyls † (’frogomander’) Eocaecilia GymnophionaKaraurus Caudata Triadobatrachus Anura (including Apoda Urodela Prosalirus †) Salientia Batrachia Lissamphibia
    [Show full text]
  • Anura: Hemiphractidae: Gastrotheca)
    Accepted Manuscript Short communication Brazilian marsupial frogs are diphyletic (Anura: Hemiphractidae: Gastrotheca) David C. Blackburn, William E. Duellman PII: S1055-7903(13)00179-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.04.021 Reference: YMPEV 4580 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 7 January 2013 Revised Date: 2 April 2013 Accepted Date: 22 April 2013 Please cite this article as: Blackburn, D.C., Duellman, W.E., Brazilian marsupial frogs are diphyletic (Anura: Hemiphractidae: Gastrotheca), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2013), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ympev.2013.04.021 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 Short Communication 2 3 Brazilian marsupial frogs are diphyletic (Anura: Hemiphractidae: Gastrotheca) 4 5 David C. Blackburna,*, William E. Duellmanb 6 a Department of Vertebrate Zoology & Anthropology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 7 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA 8 b Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, 1345 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, KS 9 66045, USA 10 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.C. Blackburn) 11 12 Abstract 13 Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on expanded taxonomic and geographic sampling 14 support the monophyly of the marsupial frog genera (family Hemiphractidae), resolve six 15 geographically circumscribed lineages within Gastrotheca, and, for the first time, reveal 16 that two divergent lineages of Gastrotheca inhabit the Atlantic Coastal Forests of Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyploidy and Sex Chromosome Evolution in Amphibians
    Chapter 18 Polyploidization and Sex Chromosome Evolution in Amphibians Ben J. Evans, R. Alexander Pyron and John J. Wiens Abstract Genome duplication, including polyploid speciation and spontaneous polyploidy in diploid species, occurs more frequently in amphibians than mammals. One possible explanation is that some amphibians, unlike almost all mammals, have young sex chromosomes that carry a similar suite of genes (apart from the genetic trigger for sex determination). These species potentially can experience genome duplication without disrupting dosage stoichiometry between interacting proteins encoded by genes on the sex chromosomes and autosomalPROOF chromosomes. To explore this possibility, we performed a permutation aimed at testing whether amphibian species that experienced polyploid speciation or spontaneous polyploidy have younger sex chromosomes than other amphibians. While the most conservative permutation was not significant, the frog genera Xenopus and Leiopelma provide anecdotal support for a negative correlation between the age of sex chromosomes and a species’ propensity to undergo genome duplication. This study also points to more frequent turnover of sex chromosomes than previously proposed, and suggests a lack of statistical support for male versus female heterogamy in the most recent common ancestors of frogs, salamanders, and amphibians in general. Future advances in genomics undoubtedly will further illuminate the relationship between amphibian sex chromosome degeneration and genome duplication. B. J. Evans (CORRECTED&) Department of Biology, McMaster University, Life Sciences Building Room 328, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada e-mail: [email protected] R. Alexander Pyron Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA J.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Spatially Explicit Call Data of Anhydrophryne Ngongoniensis to Guide Conservation Actions
    Using spatially explicit call data of Anhydrophryne ngongoniensis to guide conservation actions M Trenor orcid.org/0000-0002-0682-2262 Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Masters degree in Zoology at the North-West University Supervisor: Prof C Weldon Co-supervisor: Dr J Tarrant Graduation May 2018 25747339 Abstract It’s been barely 25 years since the Mistbelt Chirping Frog (Anhydrophryne ngongoniensis) was discovered. This secretive amphibian occurs only in the so-called mistbelt grasslands and montane forest patches of south-central KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and is restricted to an area of occupancy of just 12 square kilometers. This species’ habitat is severely fragmented due to afforestation and agriculture and only two of the remaining populations are formally protected. The species occurs mostly on fragmented grassland patches on forestry land, and any conservation strategies should include the management practices for the landowners. Updated density estimates and insight into habitat utilization are needed to proceed with conservation strategy for the species. Like many other frogs, this species is cryptic in its behaviour, making mark-recapture surveys prohibitively challenging. Audio transects have been used previously, but are dependent on surveyor’s’ experience, hindering standardization. Using automated recorders, in a spatially explicit array with GPS synchronization, one can confidently estimate the density of calling males and reveal the estimated locations of calling males, thus providing insight into their occupancy. We surveyed nine historic sites and detected the species at five of the sites in either isolated grassland patches or indigenous Afromontane forest. We successfully employed the spatially explicit catch recapture (SECR) method at three of the sites using Wildlife Acoustics™ Song Meters with extended microphones in an array.
    [Show full text]
  • Instituto De Biociências – Rio Claro Programa De Pós
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” unesp INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS – RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS (ZOOLOGIA) ANFÍBIOS DA SERRA DO MAR: DIVERSIDADE E BIOGEOGRAFIA LEO RAMOS MALAGOLI Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de doutor em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia). Agosto - 2018 Leo Ramos Malagoli ANFÍBIOS DA SERRA DO MAR: DIVERSIDADE E BIOGEOGRAFIA Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de doutor em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia). Orientador: Prof. Dr. Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Ricardo Jannini Sawaya Rio Claro 2018 574.9 Malagoli, Leo Ramos M236a Anfíbios da Serra do Mar : diversidade e biogeografia / Leo Ramos Malagoli. - Rio Claro, 2018 207 f. : il., figs., gráfs., tabs., fots., mapas Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências de Rio Claro Orientador: Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad Coorientador: Ricardo Jannini Sawaya 1. Biogeografia. 2. Anuros. 3. Conservação. 4. Diversidade funcional. 5. Elementos bióticos. 6. Mata Atlântica. 7. Regionalização. I. Título. Ficha Catalográfica elaborada pela STATI - Biblioteca da UNESP Campus de Rio Claro/SP - Ana Paula Santulo C. de Medeiros / CRB 8/7336 “To do science is to search for repeated patterns, not simply to accumulate facts, and to do the science of geographical ecology is to search for patterns of plant and animal life that can be put on a map. The person best equipped to do this is the naturalist.” Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species Robert H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Head of Xenopus Laevls. by Nellie F
    The Head of Xenopus laevls. By Nellie F. Paterson, D.Se., Ph.D., Department of Zoology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. With Plates 9 to 16. CONTENTS. PAGE INTRODUCTION 161 LATERAL LINE SENSORY ORGANS 163 MUSCULATURE 165 BLOOD-VESSELS ......... 172 THE CHONDROCRANIUM ........ 175 1. Metamorphosis ........ 183 2. Olfactory Eegion 188 3. Nasal Cavities 191 4. Auditory Eegion ........ 193 THE HYOBRANCHIAL SKELETON ....... 196 THE CRANIAL NERVES 198 Ganglion Pro-oticum ........ 199 Nervus Trigeminus ........ 200 1. Ramus Mandibularis 200 2. Ramus Ophthalmicus Profundus 203 NERVUS FACIALIS 209 1. Truncus Supra-orbitalis 210 2. Ramus Hyomandibularis . • - .211 3. Ramus Palatinus ........ 214 NERVI GLOSSOFHARYNGEtTS AND VAGUS . - .216 1. Nervus Glossopharyngeus . • • • .217 2. Nervus Vagus 220 SUMMARY OF COMPOSITION AND DISTRIBUTION OF NERVES . 226 SUMMARY 227 REFERENCES 228 INTRODUCTION. THE Aglossa, comprising only the genera Xenopus, Pipa, Propipa, Hymenochirus, and Pseudohymeno- chirus, are characterized among other things by the absence of a tongue and by a pectoral girdle that exhibits considerable deviation from that of typical Anura Phaneroglossa. NO. 322 M 162 NELLIE F. PATBESON The Aglossa are usually classified as the lowest of the A n u r a, but as Gadow in his account of the Amphibia in the ' Cambridge Natural History' (1909) indicates, their characteristic features are not necessarily primitive ones. A tongue is lacking in the majority of truly aquatic forms, and in the Aglossa the shoulder girdle and other parts of the body are doubtless specialized in response to their particular habits. It is therefore not surprising to find that the Aglossa present some striking morphological similarities with the aquatic Urodela on the one hand, and with certain genera of the Phaneroglossa on the other, but it is very doubtful if these resemblances are of any conse- quence.
    [Show full text]
  • The IUCN Amphibians Initiative: a Record of the 2001-2008 Amphibian Assessment Efforts for the IUCN Red List
    The IUCN Amphibians Initiative: A record of the 2001-2008 amphibian assessment efforts for the IUCN Red List Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Amphibians on the IUCN Red List - Home Page ................................................................................ 5 Assessment process ......................................................................................................................... 6 Partners ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 The Central Coordinating Team ............................................................................................................................ 6 The IUCN/SSC – CI/CABS Biodiversity Assessment Unit........................................................................................ 6 An Introduction to Amphibians ................................................................................................................................. 7 Assessment methods ................................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Data Collection .................................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Data Review ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving a Taxonomic and Nomenclatural Puzzle in Mantellid Frogs: Synonymization of Gephyromantis Azzurrae with G
    ZooKeys 951: 133–157 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.951.51129 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Resolving a taxonomic and nomenclatural puzzle in mantellid frogs: synonymization of Gephyromantis azzurrae with G. corvus, and description of Gephyromantis kintana sp. nov. from the Isalo Massif, western Madagascar Walter Cocca1, Franco Andreone2, Francesco Belluardo1, Gonçalo M. Rosa3,4, Jasmin E. Randrianirina5, Frank Glaw6, Angelica Crottini1,7 1 CIBIO, Research Centre in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, InBIO, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, No 7, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal 2 Sezione di Zoologia, Mu- seo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Via G. Giolitti, 36, 10123 Torino, Italy 3 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, NW1 4RY London, UK 4 Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal 5 Parc Botanique et Zoologique de Tsimbazaza, BP 4096, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 6 Zoologische Staatssammlung München (ZSM-SNSB), Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247 München, Germany 7 Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, R. Campo Alegre, s/n, 4169- 007, Porto, Portugal Corresponding author: Angelica Crottini ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Ohler | Received 14 February 2020 | Accepted 9 May 2020 | Published 22 July 2020 http://zoobank.org/5C3EE5E1-84D5-46FE-8E38-42EA3C04E942 Citation: Cocca W, Andreone F, Belluardo F, Rosa GM, Randrianirina JE, Glaw F, Crottini A (2020) Resolving a taxonomic and nomenclatural puzzle in mantellid frogs: synonymization of Gephyromantis azzurrae with G.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories Approved by Recommendation 4.7, As Amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Ms Limpho Motanya, Department of Water Affairs. Ministry of Natural Resources, P O Box 772, Maseru, LESOTHO. Designation date Site Reference Number 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: October 2003 3. Country: LESOTHO 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Lets`eng - la – Letsie 5. Map of site included: Refer to Annex III of the Explanatory Note and Guidelines, for detailed guidance on provision of suitable maps. a) hard copy (required for inclusion of site in the Ramsar List): yes (X) -or- no b) digital (electronic) format (optional): yes (X) -or- no 6. Geographical coordinates (latitude/longitude): The area lies between 30º 17´ 02´´ S and 30º 21´ 53´´ S; 28º 08´ 53´´ E and 28º 15´ 30´´ E xx 7. General location: Include in which part of the country and which large administrative region(s), and the location of the nearest large town.
    [Show full text]