Appendix Milton Agonistes: the Date of Samson Agonistes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix Milton Agonistes: the Date of Samson Agonistes Appendix Milton Agonistes: The Date of Samson Agonistes There has, in recent years, been no more contentious issue among Miltonists than the date of Samson Agonistes. Until thirty years ago it was almost universally accepted that the play was Milton's last poetic composition-an assumption based on Jonathan Richard­ son's assertion, in his influential Life of Milton (I 734), that 'His Time was Now [i.e. after I66o] Employ'din Writing and Publish­ ing, particularly Paradise Lost. and after That, Paradise Regain'd and Samson Agonistei.' This 'traditional' dating-which places the compositon of the drama in I667-7o-came under heavy fire for the first time in I 949, in a special Milton number of Philological Quarterly containing essays by W. R. Parker and Allan H. Gilbert. Parker argued that Samson Agonistes was begun in I646-7 and completed in I 653; Gilbert, on the other hand, assigned its composition to the early I64os: 'My own impression ... is that the tragedy is essentially an early work, following soon after the making of the notes in the Cambridge Manuscript.'• Since I 949 the dispute has raged hody and, sometimes, acrimoniously. Gil­ bert's suggestion has attracted no real support; but Parker's hypothesis-forcefully reasserted by Parker himself and taken up by a number of other scholars as well-has had considerable influence.3 At the same time, however, the traditional date has been ably defended,• and it is fair to say that, at the present time, scholarly opinion strongly favours a I667-70 dating. There remains one further dating proposal, which places the composition of Samson Agonistes in I 66o-I-that is, immediately after the Restoration. Although this conjecture is an old one, having been first suggested in I 796, it has been largely ignored and has been advanced in a serious way by only one modem critic, A. S. P. Woodhouse: 'I do not believe that the poem was the product or reflection of a normal mood, but rather of a state of depression not very difficult to imagine in the poet whose world had collapsed around him and who was blind, disillusioned, ill, and essentially alone. Such must have been the prevailing mood of I95 John Milton: Poet, Priest and Prophet I 66o- I, when the poem, I suggest, was most probably written. 's Unfortunately, Woodhouse does not develop this proposal in detail-though his argument is far from being the 'ill-supported plea' that John Carey (PM, p. 332) claims it to be. For a number of years I have believed that a I66o- I dating has much to recommend it; and the more I have worked with Samson Agonistes and the more familiar I have become with the experience and attitudes of Milton himself, the more convinced I have become of the essential rightness of Woodhouse's thesis. To my knowledge, his original motion has never been seconded-nor, although it has often been dismissed, has it been refuted. The argument, then, at least merits reconsideration. There are some few preliminary observations to be briefly made, however, before coming to the major argument. First, nothing whatever is known for certain about the composition of Samson Agonistes. The contemporary biographers give us no help: Edward Phillips (I694) freely admits that 'It cannot certainly be concluded when he wrote his excellent Tragedy entitled Samson Agonistes';6 the anonymous biographer says only that the drama was finished after the Restoration and gives no hint as to when it was begun; John Phillips and Toland (I6g8) mention it but say nothing about its composition; and neither Aubrey (I 68 I) nor Wood (I6gi) even mentions the work. W. R. Parker is quite correct in asserting that 'not a scrap of evidence has ever been published to show that it was written late in Milton's life' (MB, II, pp. 903-4); but it is equally true-despite Parker's claims to the contrary-that there is no solid evidence to show that it was written in middle life. Certainty on the matter is beyond possibili­ ty; and any attempt-including my own-to establish when the poem was written is necessarily grounded on inference and speculation. Second, I am not convinced that Milton's imagery and poetic style provide any real help in determining the date of Samson Agonistes. On the one hand, the complicated statistical studies of Miltonic prosody have been inconclusive-indeed, contradictory.7 And, on the other hand, since Milton frequendy re-uses phrases and images employed in earlier pieces, I am profoundly distrustful of arguments relying on parallel images in different works as a basis for dating.8 Third, since SamsonAgonistes not only employs rhyme but draws attention to its use, I believe that the play must pre-date I667, when Milton added to late issues of the first edition of Paradise Lost9 a note on 'The Verse' in Appendix 1 97 which he inveighs against 'the troublesome and modern bondage of rhyming' (PM, p. 457). The major reason for wishing to assign Samson Agonistes to 166o-1 depends upon biographical considerations. Biographical readings of the play are, of course, not new. The tradition seems to begin with Bishop Thomas Newton who suggested in his Life of Milton ( 1749) that Milton was attracted to the Samson story by the similarity between his own post-Restoration situation and that of tlte blind Hebrew champion surrounded by the Philistines. Although others supported Newton's view, it was left for David Masson to develop fully the possibilities of the biographical approach: But in the entire idea of the drama what else have we than a representation of the Puritan and Republican Milton in his secret antagonism to all the powers and all the fashions of the Restoration? Who are the Philistines but the partisans of the Restoration, all and sundry, its authors and abettors before the fact, and its multitudinous applauders and sycophants through the nation afterwards? Who are the Philistine lords and ladies, and captains, and priests, assembled in their seats within the covered part of the temple of Dagon on the day of festival? Who but Charles himself, and the Duke of York, and the whole pell-mell of the Clarendons, Buckinghams, Buckhursts, K.illi­ grews, Casdemaines, Moll Davises, Nell Gwynns, Sheldons, Morleys, and some hundreds of others .... There were mo­ ments, I believe, in Milton's musings by himself, when it was a fell pleasure to him to imagine some exertion of his strength, like that legendary one of Samson's, by which, clutching the two central pillars of the Philistine temple, he might tug and strain till he brought down the whole fabric in crash upon the heads of the heathenish congregation, perishing himself in the act, but leaving England bettered by the carnage. That was metaphorical musing only, a dream of the embers, all fantasti­ cal. But was there not a very real sense in which he had been performing feats of strength under the gaze of the Philistine congregation, to their moral amazement, though not to their physical destruction? Degraded at the Restoration, dismissed into obscurity, and thought of for some years, when thought of at all, only as a shackled wretch or monster, incapacitated for farther mischief or farther activity of any kind, had he not Ig8 John Milton: Poet, Priest and Prophet re-emerged most gloriously? By his Paradise Lost already, and now by his Paradise Regained and this very Samson Agonistes, he had entitled himself to the place of preeminency in the litera­ ture of that Philistine age, the Philistines themselves being the judges. (LM, VI, pp. 676-7) In our own century the biographical approach has been retained by James Holly Hanford, E. M. W. Tillyard, and A. S. P. Woodhouse. Hanford, for example, writes: 'In Samson's career as a champion of God's people [Milton] could see his own earlier heroic efforts in behalf of the good old cause. In the weakness which had betrayed him into the hands of a treacherous woman, he could read the causes of his own marriage disaster. The circumstances which surrounded his hero in blindness and cap­ tivity naturally associated themselves with the poet's immediate situation in the Restoration. The spiritual despair and the subse­ quent sense of God's favor represent an interpretation of the Biblical personality in the light of his own deepest personal emotion.' •o In recent years the biographical approach to Samson Agonistes has largely been ignored. Either it is thought to be one of those self-evident truths too obvious for comment or, more often, it is seen to be a 'dangerous' approach to the poem-a critical avenue known to exist but not much travelled by the better classes. These attitudes are unfortunate, for they rob the poem of a legitimate level of meaning. 'Samson', warns Anthony Low, 'is not Milton, however, regardless of how much he may reflect Milton's experi­ ence. To push autobiographical theories further, as their respon­ sible exponents recognize, is to depart from the play itself.'" But surely there is a very real sense in which Samson is Milton-precisely because he does reflect so much of Milton's experience. Masson comes, I believe, much closer to the truth of the matter: 'The marvel, then, is that this purely artistic drama, this strictly objective poetic creation, should have been all the while so profoundly and intensely subjective. Nothing put forth by Milton in verse in his whole life is so vehement an exhibition of his personality, such a proclamation of his own thoughts about himself and about the world around him, as his Samson Agonistes.
Recommended publications
  • A Review of Gordon Campbell and Thomas N. Corn, John Milton: Life, Work and Thought,” Studies in English Literature 52(2011) 日本英文学会発行。
    Yuko Kanakubo Noro, “A Review of Gordon Campbell and Thomas N. Corn, John Milton: Life, Work and Thought,” Studies in English Literature 52(2011) 日本英文学会発行。 Gordon Campbell and Thomas N. Corns John Milton: Life, Work and Thought Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. xiii+488pp. Reviewed by Yuko Kanakubo Noro, Nihon University In 2008, to commemorate the quartercentenary of John Milton’s birth (December 9, 1608), several influential books of Milton studies were published: Is Milton Better than Shakespeare?, by Nigel Smith; John Milton: Paradise Lost edited by Philip Pullman 1 and A Concise Companion to Milton edited by Angelica Duran. There are three biographies as well: Milton: Poet, Pamphleteer and Patriot by Anna Beer; John Milton: A Biography by Neil Forsyth; and John Milton: Life, Work and Thought by Gordon Campbell and Thomas N. Corns. The three biographies differ from each other in the following ways: Beer’s attitude towards Milton’s life reminds the reader of Wordsworth’s invocation to Milton in his sonnet, which begins with “Milton! thou shouldst be living at this hour: / England hath need of thee:”. In short, by appreciating the great poet’s life and works, the reader is to share Milton’s thought, energy and posture towards the world’s difficulties and problems, and live positively, imitating Milton as an exemplum. The base of Beer’s approach is sympathy. Neil Forsyth’s approach is to some extent similar to Beer’s, but he seems to grasp the figure of Milton more objectively than she does, and he seems to entertain his readers by solving the problem as to, “[W]hy Milton is so loved and admired, and even, sometimes, detested”(p.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton
    C01.qxd 8/18/08 14:44 Page 1 Introduction to the 1645 Volume: Poems of Mr. John Milton In 1645, Milton published most but not all of the poems he had composed by that date. The publisher Humphrey Moseley had been bringing out volumes of lyric poetry by royalist poets such as Edmund Waller, and it was likely, as he claims in the intro- duction to the volume, that he approached Milton and encouraged him to publish his verse. Moseley also arranged for the engraved portrait of Milton by William Marshall (see Figure 1), beneath which Milton, who considered the engraving unflattering, placed a witty Greek epigram ridiculing it in a language neither Marshall nor Moseley under- stood. Unlike most contemporary poets, Milton neither wrote a preface, solicited commendatory poems, nor acknowledged a patron. He organized his volume more or less chronologically, thus displaying his poetic development, but also carefully grouped together poems of similar themes and genres. With the Latin tag from Virgil’s Eclogues on the title page (“Baccare frontem / Cingite, ne vati noceat mala lingua futuro” – “Bind my forehead with foxglove, lest evil tongues harm the future Bard”), he promises future poems on even greater themes. In the Latin ode sent with a replacement copy of the volume to John Rouse, librar- ian of the Bodleian Library at Oxford, Milton describes the 1645 volume as a “twin book, rejoicing in a single cover, but with a double title page.” The first section of the volume presents his vernacular poems (mostly in English, but also including a mini-sonnet sequence in Italian), and concludes with A MASK Presented At LUDLOW- Castle.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Autobiographical Interpretation of Samson Agonistes Edward P
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research Summer 1966 An evaluation of the autobiographical interpretation of Samson Agonistes Edward P. Crockett Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Crockett, Edward P., "An evaluation of the autobiographical interpretation of Samson Agonistes" (1966). Master's Theses. Paper 242. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Evaluation of the J.utobiogrnphioal Interpretation ot Samson /;Sonistes By FA:lward, P. Crockett A Thesis ·Presented to· the Faculty. of the Department-of Engtish of' the University or Hlehtnond 'in Partial Ful.fillme.nt of the Requirements for the Master or Arts Degi;ee Richmond, Virginia August l, 1968 .·-,, .. .,. - .... • J • ·~ I .... ~ .Approved for the Gradua~.• School and the Department of English by . 1 Dean of .the Graduat$ School ~~ · ~ a?:ase -< Chairman of the English Department . I conceived my self. to be nQw .not as .m,ine . own person, but as a member incorporate into tha:t truth whereof I was .persuaded, and whereof I h8.d declare-d .o·penly t'o be a partaker. (Milton, :ll!!. Apology: fo~ Smectymnuus) T.. 4.BLE OF CON1'1t~NTS Preface • Chapter It Fos.sible Sources tor Samso11 Agort1.stes. Page l Chapter II: A Summary of Representative Scholar­ ship Concerning the.Autobiographical Inter~ pretationof the Drama ·and Its Date of Com­ position.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Jones
    Edward Jones Events in John Milton’s life Events in Milton’s time JM is born in Bread Street (Dec 9) 1608 Shakespeare’s Pericles debuts to and baptized in the church of All great acclaim. Hallows, London (Dec 20). Champlain founds a colony at Quebec. 1609 Shakespeare’s Cymbeline is performed late in the year or in the first months of 1610, most likely indoors at the Blackfriars Theatre. The British establish a colony in Bermuda. Moriscos (Christianized Muslims) are expelled from Spain. Galileo constructs his first telescope. The Dutch East India Company ships the first tea to Europe. A tax assessment (E179/146/470) 1610 Galileo discovers the four largest confirms the Miltons residing in moons of Jupiter (Jan 7). the parish of All Hallows, London Ellen Jeffrey, JM’s maternal 1611 Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale is grandmother, is buried in All performed at the Globe Theatre Hallows, London (Feb 26). (May). The Authorized Version (King James Bible) is published. Shakespeare’s The Tempest is performed at court (Nov 1). The Dutch begin trading with Japan. The First Presbyterian Congregation is established at Jamestown. JM’s sister Sara is baptized (Jul 15) 1612 Henry, Prince of Wales, dies. and buried in All Hallows, London Charles I becomes heir to the (Aug 6). throne. 1613 A fire breaks out during a performance of Shakespeare’s Henry VIII and destroys the Globe Theatre (Jun 29). 218 Select Chronology Events in John Milton’s life Events in Milton’s time JM’s sister Tabitha is baptized in 1614 Shakespeare’s Two Noble Kinsmen All Hallows, London (Jan 30).
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Objective-Subjective Elements in John Milton's Dramatic Poem Samson Agonistes
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1947 An Analysis of the Objective-Subjective Elements in John Milton's Dramatic Poem Samson Agonistes Louis S. Kaluzsa Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Recommended Citation Kaluzsa, Louis S., "An Analysis of the Objective-Subjective Elements in John Milton's Dramatic Poem Samson Agonistes" (1947). Master's Theses. 635. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/635 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1947 Louis S. Kaluzsa AN ANALYSIS OF THE OBJECTIVE-SUBJECTIVE ELEMENTS IN JOHN MILTON'S DRAMATIC POEM SAMSON AGONISTES BY LOUIS S. KALUZSA, S.J. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULF'ILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY JUNE 1947 VITA AUCTORIS Louis s. Kaluzsa, S.J., was born in Cleve­ land, Ohio, October 13, 1916. He was graduated from Cathedral Latin High School, Cleveland, Ohio, June, 1934. He entered John Carroll University, Cleveland, Ohio, in Septemb~r, 1934. After completing two years there, he entered the Milford Novitiate of the Society of Jesus in 1936 and waB enrolled at St. Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, whence he received his Litt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Provenance of John Milton's Christian Doctrine
    SEL 34 (1994) ISSN 0039-3657 Forum II: Milton's Christian Doctrine The Provenance ofJohn Milton's Christian Doctrine: A Reply to William B. Hunter MAURICE KELLEY As scholars have determined it during the past century and a half, the provenance of the Christian Doctrine should invite no suspicion of Milton's authorship. Instead it confirms it. The treatise originated in Milton's youthful collection of proof texts and his perusal of certain shorter systems of theology.' By the 1640s, Edward Phillips reports, his uncle was dictating to him and his fellow students portions of a "Tractate which he thought fit to collect from the ablest of Divines, who had written of that subject: Arnesius, Wollebius. &c. viz. A perfect System of Divinity, of which more hereafter."2 Phillips, however, failed to keep his promise of more information about "A perfect System," but the Anonymous Biographer (Cyriack Skinner) reports that about 1655 Milton began "the framing a Body of Divinity out of the Bible . which . hee finished after the Restoration."3 Our manuscript of the Christian Doctrine confirms Cyriack's rough dating, for the primary hand in it is that ofJeremie Picard, who served as witness or scribe in Milton documents dating from January 1658 to May 1660;4 and Cyriack's mention of Milton's heterodoxies5 indicates Maurice Kelley is Emeritus Professor of English, Princeton University. 154 REPLY TO HUNT E R that he is writing of the Christian Doctrine that we have today. Parallels between the treatise and Paradise Lost as well as between it and Milton's Art of Logic, not published until 1672,6 confirm Milton's authorship of the systematic theology.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton's Attitude Toward Women
    The Woman's College of The University of North Carolina LIBRARY no. 3?0 COLLEGE COLLECTION Gift of Marianne Sewell Aiken MILTON'S ATTITUDE TOWARD WOMEN by Marianne Sewell Aiken A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Greensboro May, I965 Approved by 6, Director APPROVAL SHEET This thesis has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina. Thesis Director Oral Examination Committee Members t> Date of Examination AIKEN. MARIAN ! 3EWELL. Milton's Attitude Toward Women.(1965) Directed by Dr. Jean E. Gagen. pp. 66. Milton lived in a period of transition affectin^ many as- pects of life, among them the status of wonen. Age-old conserva- tive beliefs were still alive and had a temporary resurgence un- der the Puritan hegemony, but liberal forces were also at work* The poet had the misfortune to be involved in a partic- ularly unhappy marriage. After a youth spent largely in study, with little contact with young women, he hastily married an im- mature Royalist bride, Mary Powell. Her refusal to return to Milton after she had left him in the early months of the mar- riage to visit her family suggests that Hilton and Mary Powell were incompatible from the start. Though there was a reconcil- iation later, Hilton's relationship with her, her whole -family, and, after her death, her children as well, was replete with friction and bitterness.
    [Show full text]
  • Comus by John Milton
    Comus By John Milton 1 MILTON'S COMUS WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY WILLIAM BELL, M.A. PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY AND LOGIC, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE, LAHORE First Edition, 1890. Reprinted, 1891. 2 INTRODUCTION. Few poems have been more variously designated than Comus. Milton himself describes it simply as "A Mask"; by others it has been criticised and estimated as a lyrical drama, a drama in the epic style, a lyric poem in the form of a play, a phantasy, an allegory, a philosophical poem, a suite of speeches or majestic soliloquies, and even a didactic poem. Such variety in the description of the poem is explained partly by its complex charm and many-sided interest, and partly by the desire to describe it from that point of view which should best reconcile its literary form with what we know of the genius and powers of its author. Those who, like Dr. Johnson, have blamed it as a drama, have admired it "as a series of lines," or as a lyric; one writer, who has found that its characters are nothing, its sentiments tedious, its story uninteresting, has nevertheless "doubted whether there will ever be any similar poem which gives so true a conception of the capacity and the dignity of the mind by which it was produced" (Bagehot's Literary Studies). Some who have praised it as an allegory see in it a satire on the evils both of the Church and of the State, while others regard it as alluding to the vices of the Court alone. Some have found its lyrical parts the best, while others, charmed with its "divine philosophy," have commended those deep conceits which place it alongside of the Faerie Queen, as shadowing forth an episode in the education of a noble soul and as a poet's lesson against intemperance and impurity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Italy in Milton's Early Poetic Development
    Italia Conquistata: The Role of Italy in Milton’s Early Poetic Development Submitted by Paul Slade to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in December 2017 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. Abstract My thesis explores the way in which the Italian language and literary culture contributed to John Milton’s early development as a poet (over the period up to 1639 and the composition of Epitaphium Damonis). I begin by investigating the nature of the cultural relationship between England and Italy in the late medieval and early modern periods. I then examine how Milton’s own engagement with the Italian language and its literature evolved in the context of his family background, his personal contacts with the London Italian community and modern language teaching in the early seventeenth century as he grew to become a ‘multilingual’ poet. My study then turns to his first published collection of verse, Poems 1645. Here, I reconsider the Italian elements in Milton’s early poetry, beginning with the six poems he wrote in Italian, identifying their place and significance in the overall structure of the volume, and their status and place within the Italian Petrarchan verse tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton and the Tyrant's Image Cora Gray Cedarville University, [email protected]
    Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville The Research and Scholarship Symposium The 2013 yS mposium Apr 10th, 1:40 PM - 2:00 PM Yesterday and Today: Milton and the Tyrant's Image Cora Gray Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/ research_scholarship_symposium Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Gray, Cora, "Yesterday and Today: Milton and the Tyrant's Image" (2013). The Research and Scholarship Symposium. 8. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/research_scholarship_symposium/2013/podium_presentations/8 This Podium Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Research and Scholarship Symposium by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gray 1 Yesterday and Today: Milton and the Tyrant’s Image The bell rings, and the dog is given a treat. The bell rings again, and the dog receives another treat. The cycle continues; the bell rings, and the dog eats his treat. But soon Pavlov’s dog has become so accustomed to the cycle that the bell rings and the dog is already salivating, awaiting the treat that always comes next. While a seemingly harmless experiment on a dog, Pavlov’s observation reveals an often-overlooked aspect of the human state – one’s susceptibility to conditioning. Whether a sound, a color, an action, or merely a word – an image is projected that suggests how one should live and interact. While the all-pervasive influence of images dictating reality seems to be a modern phenomenon, it traces its roots to the imposing pyramids of the Egyptian pharaohs or the expressive statues of the ancient Greeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Areopagítica / John Milton ; Prefacio Mario Murgia
    Areopagítica COLECCIÓN PEQUEÑOS GRANDES ENSAYOS DIRECTOR DE LA COLECCIÓN Álvaro Uribe CONSEJO EDITORIAL DE LA COLECCIÓN Sealtiel Alatriste David Turner Barragán Arturo Camilo Ayala Ochoa Elsa Botello López José Emilio Pacheco Antonio Saborit Ernesto de la Torre Villar Juan Villoro Colin White Muller DIRECTOR FUNDADOR Hernán Lara Zavala Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Coordinación de Difusión Cultural Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial JOHN MIlton Areopagítica Prefacio y traducción de MARIO MUR G IA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO 2009 Milton, John, 1608-1674 Areopagítica / John Milton ; prefacio Mario Murgia. – México : UNAM, Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, 2009. 116 p. ; 15 cm. – (Colección Pequeños Grandes Ensayos) ISBN 978- 1. Libertad de prensa – Obras anteriores a 1800. I. Murgia, Mario. II. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial. III. t. IV. Ser. 323.445-scdd20 Biblioteca Nacional de México Título original: Areopagitica: A speech of Mr. John Milton for the liberty of unlicensed printing to the Parlament of England Primera edición en la colección Pequeños Grandes Ensayos: 5 de octubre de 2009 © D.R. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO Ciudad Universitaria, 04510, México, D.F. DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE PUBLICACIONES Y FOMENTO EDITORIAL Prohibida su reproducción parcial o total por cualquier medio sin autorización escrita de su legítimo titular de derechos ISBN de la colección: 978-970-32-0479-1 ISBN de la obra: Impreso
    [Show full text]
  • Milton's Christ, As Seen by the Critics of Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained Since 1900
    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Master's Theses Graduate School Summer 1962 Milton's Christ, as Seen by the Critics of Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained Since 1900 Robert Granger Wright Fort Hays Kansas State College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Robert Granger, "Milton's Christ, as Seen by the Critics of Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained Since 1900" (1962). Master's Theses. 743. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses/743 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. MILTON'S CHRIST, AS SEEN BY THE CRITICS OF PARADISE LOST AND PARADIS E REGAI NED SINCE 1900 being A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty I of the Fort Hays Kans as State Col lege i n Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by . Robert Granger Wright, A.B. Fort Hays Kansas State Col lege Approved<;J? C , Major Pro1·essor PREFACE My idea for this thesj_s grew out of a term paper written for Dr. Roberta Stout1 s Milton Seminaro The idea developed into a thesis which has an over-all purpose of presenting the primary investigations and cormnentaries of the twentieth century critics upon }1ilton1 s Christ and to arrive at conclusions which pertain to these critical findings o Difficulties encountered in the writing of this paper cen- tered around the fact that almost all of the research material was gathered through interlibrary loans.
    [Show full text]