Israel, the Land and the Sacred

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Israel, the Land and the Sacred I. PUBLIC LECTURES JEAN-CHRISTOPHE ATTIAS–ESTHER BENBASSA ISRAEL, THE LAND AND THE SACRED Through so many centuries of exile, what has the land of Israel represent- ed to the Jewish imagination?1 The memory of ancient glory. The horizon of an expectation. The improbable site on to which is projected a hope for better days. Somewhere between heaven and earth, and more often nearer heaven than earth, Zion beckons and gives meaning. There, one day, the restoration of this fractured world will be complete; there, one day, the Jews will see the end of their tribulations. One day there in Zion or maybe here, perhaps today. While waiting for the dream to be realised, it is always possible to imagine that the place where one lives is already like a Jerusalem in exile, and like the provisional extension of a land of Israel that is inaccessible. Amsterdam is the Jerusalem of the North, Sarajevo is the Jerusalem of the Orient, Tlemcen is the Jerusalem of North Africa, Vilna is the Jerusalem of the East… One person’s Jerusalem is not another’s. Each Jewish group has its own, which it places above all others. Of course, such a land does not replace the real and distant one, but merely allows the group to be patient, to bear exile, internalised but never totally accepted. Not far from Istanbul, two Jewish villages face each other, one on the European shore of the Bosphorus and the other on the Asian shore. Each still has its own cemetery. The most pious and devout folk of the European village would prefer to be buried with their neighbours on the Asian side of the Bosphorus. Their bodies would thus cross the narrow strait to rest over there, opposite, in almost holy soil, just a little nearer Jerusalem. Did they thus imagine themselves, on the day of resurrection, arriving more quickly and surely in the land of Israel? Was this a shortcut? At least this is how legend would have it… Israel, Promised Land, Holy Land, the consolation of exile. How can we describe it? How can we touch the dream without distorting it, decode it without being submerged by the emotion that evoking it unfailingly arous- es, and try to understand that emotion itself? The task seems arduous. And still more so these days than formerly, now that the dream is incarnated and has become reality. Moreover, this reality has by no means killed the dream. Different from what it was, imperturbable, throughout the ages, the dream does not cease to haunt the minds of Jews of the Diaspora as well as of Israelis. A few words about its medieval roots will make it easier to understand some of its contemporary metamorphoses. 1 This lecture briefly evokes some of the issues extensively dealt with in our book Israel, the Impossible Land, trans. Susan Emanuel (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003). Complete bibliographical data can be found there (pp. 270–86). 7 JEAN-CHRISTOPHE ATTIAS-ESTHER BENBASSA Doomed to have no political power, both in exile and dispersed, the Medieval Jew stands on the periphery of the world he lives in. Long ago the land of Israel ceased to be a place where a reunited people could exist. And nearly as long ago, it ceased to be the centre of a Diaspora perceived like a boundary. The Medieval Jew has no means at all to assert his rights to a land which through the epic of the Crusades, is the heart of spiritual aspirations and imperialistic ambitions of the two great religions, daughters of Israel, stressing at the same time the decline of its former owners. This alienation of the land, now under one rule, now under another, even though none seemed destined to settle for long or beget a real rebirth, naturally evokes the alienation of the people expelled from it, it, too, humiliated and depending on the goodwill of various and inconstant masters. The situa- tion of Israel and its land, bearing the marks of exile and expropriation, also seems to constitute a historical sanction of the theological pretensions of Christianity and Islam. So, how can we dare to claim, in spite of all appear- ances, that the mission of Israel and its exclusive link to its land are still con- tinuing? To organise an efficient spiritual resistance to the hard facts of history is a very arduous task in the cultural world born from the meeting of Islam and the philosophical and scientific heritage of Ancient Greece. From now on, Jewish and non-Jewish thinkers focus their attention on abstract and totally timeless themes, God, his essence and his existence, the Creation, prophecy, good and evil, reward and punishment, etc. Moreover, the con- ception, currently admitted by philosophers, of the Divinity and its relation to the world (an impersonal relation, governed by a system of universal and immutable laws) makes the Jewish theme of God’s choice of one people and one land, quite problematical. Thus the struggle is being organised on several fronts. The loss of the physical contact with the land is compensat- ed with its idealisation. Far from being satisfied with the accumulated treas- ures of Jewish traditional culture, and even though they keep on studying them in depth, some great masters of Jewish thought, philosophers or kab- balists, will endeavour to build up a theology of the land, likely to repel, suc- cessfully, the attacks of their Christian and Muslim counterparts, even by trying to make use of the scientific, climatological and astrological knowl- edge or beliefs then shared commonly by the medieval world. A real territorial exception, the land of Israel is far more than a territory. It is the image and the sign of the Jewish exception. Its intimate link to God sends back to God’s intimate link to Israel. Any change of the relations between Israel and its land is nothing but the clear sign of a change of its relations with God. However, no alteration of this kind is irrevocable and definitive. And none is as deep as appearances seem to tell. The land is a person endowed with will, which may be negative or favourable, now accepting now rejecting its inhabitants. Those who live on it, breathe a pure air and its dust for those buried in it has an expiatory power, compa- rable to that of the altar of sacrifices. Its successive conquerors did not man- age to put down roots, which reveals its positive resistance to any illegal 8 ISRAEL, THE LAND AND THE SACRED takeover. The land of Israel is hit by nothing but what it accepts to be hit by. Essentially pure, nothing could possibly stain it. The destruction and the oppression of a foreign ruler only has a limited impact on it: perhaps the divine impulse from above is no more as intense as it used to be, but evil has no grip on it, and it has itself the power to reject impurity. To consider that the effects of impious acts committed in the Holy Land through centuries are non-existent or fundamentally inessential is a way of implying that the relation of history to it, is like water off a duck’s back. The land of Israel is no more in history, but out of it. The rags of spoliation and destruction mask an essential, divine and unchanging land whose present troubles by no means affect it and which, some day, once again, is to reveal itself in all its untarnished glory. Indefinitely idealised, the land medieval Jews are dreaming of is this land toward which they turn to pray thrice a day. But it is also far more than that, and really something else. The more it is perceived as holy, the more it is lived as different – and as terrible. The modern Jewish Zionist-inspired ideology, of course, tended to claim that after destruction and dispersion nothing in fact had jeopardised the Jews’ relationship toward the Holy Land and that this land had never even been weakened by some symbolisation of the sacred space or by the trans- fer of this sacrality to whatever space or institution. However, the simple reading of texts inevitably makes such a simplistic axiom questionable. The longing for the lost place, as nostalgia, as the awareness of a lack, could not feed on itself alone. This desire, in fact, was never completely unappeased. The powers of dream, the artifices of allegory made Zion present at every time and everywhere. And there lay the paradox: the more one thought about the land, the more one forgot it. Even more: having it continually on mind, keeping on naming it was perhaps the best way to forget it… By associating it with such a superterrestrial reality, intellect agent or sefi- ra, philosophers and kabbalists work towards what can be called a ‘surreali- sation’ of the land of Israel, and at the same time, contribute to its ‘dereali- sation’. The moment it becomes a divine entity, the upper Holy Land is nec- essarily much more ‘real’ than the inferior material world where we live. On the other hand, because its essence comes from the celestial, with which it is in a privileged touch, the lower Holy Land may lose in the same propor- tion, every ‘reality’, this time in the terrestrial sense of the word. Then it is a short way from idealisation to allegorisation, from the temptation of meta- physics to the seductions of metaphor. An easy way to go, which makes the land less and less itself to be more and more something different from itself.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Towards a Visualisation of the Zionist Sabra 1930-1967 JC Torday
    Towards a visualisation of the Zionist Sabra 1930-1967 JC Torday A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Brighton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2014 1 Declaration I declare that the research contained in this thesis, unless otherwise formally indicated within the text, is the original work of the author. The thesis has not been previously submitted to this or any other university for a degree, and does not incorporate any material already submitted for a degree. Signed JC Torday Dated February 2014 2 Abstract (page 3) Introduction (page 5) Research Approach (page 16) Arab Villages and colonisation (page 24) Cultural Memory and collective memory (page 31) Chapter 1: Theoretical considerations and influences on Zionist photographs (page 39) Critics of and theories about photographs (page 39) Influences on Israeli photography (page 45) Chapter 2: Zionism and colonialism (page 71) The rise of Zionism (page 71) The Iron Wall (page 76) A view from 1947 (page 81) Zionism and anti-Semitism (page 84) Zionism and Fascism (page 87) Zionism and nationalism (page 90) Colonialism (page 93) Colonialism and Zionism (97) Three waves of Jewish immigration (page 102) The Sharon Plan (page 105) Colonialism and photographs (108) Biblical archaeology (page 113) Ethnocentric myth (page 119) Chapter 3: Photography in the Holy Land and beyond (page 121) Beginnings (page 121) Photographs in the Yishuv (page 130) Photographs in Israel (page 147) Chapter 4: The Sabra (page 174) The myth of the Sabra (page
    [Show full text]
  • Israel at 70
    Israel at 70 Israel as a Double Gift Dr. Ari Berman, President, Yeshiva University Our generation is blessed to witness the 70th birthday of the modern State of Israel. While the State of Israel is of profound importance to Jews everywhere, it holds unique resonance for us as religious Zionists, for it potentially signals the coming of a long-hoped-for redemption. Consequently, as we reflect upon the seven decades since Israel’s birth, it is useful to clarify the way in which a modern nation-state like Israel can herald redemption. Of the many foundational ideas that Biblical Israel has contributed to the history of civilization, perhaps the most ambitious is the concept of a collective redemption—the notion that not only should individuals strive for their ultimate betterment, but that society can and must move history forward together. Reflections on this theme are most concentrated in the Bible’s prophetic literature. Broadly speaking, one finds therein two contrasting models for what redemption entails, the first represented in the book of Ezekiel, the second in the book of Isaiah. Ezekiel, in chapter 37, envisions redemption as a project fundamentally benefitting the Jewish people. Although dispersed throughout the world, and oppressed throughout history, this paradigmatic minority will one day be revived. The climax of Ezekiel’s best known eschatological prophecy—his vision of the valley of the dry bones—is God’s promise to His people: “I will bring you back to the land of Israel” (37:12). For Ezekiel, the goal of the redemptive process is internally oriented. Isaiah, by contrast, consistently articulates a redemptive vision that encompasses all of humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Diaspora As a Catalyst for Jewish Peoplehood
    The Israeli Diaspora as a Catalyst for Jewish Peoplehood An Emerging Opportunity within the Changing Relationship between Israel and the Jewish world Conceptual Framework Adar 5772 March 2012 1 March 2012 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... 2 The team .......................................................................................................................... 2 Executive summary ........................................................................................................ 4 Guidelines for quick reading ......................................................................................... 9 Background ..................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1: Changing paradigm in Israel-Jewish world relations ............................. 9 The 'old relationship' between Israel and the Jewish world ................................ 10 A new relationship: Jewish Peoplehood is taking center-stage ........................... 11 Chapter 2: The changing nature of the Israeli Diaspora .......................................... 13 The current mindset vis-à-vis the Israeli Diaspora ............................................... 13 The changing reality vis-à-vis the Israeli Diaspora .............................................. 15 Chapter 3: The opportunity: The Israeli Diaspora as a catalyst for Peoplehood .. 18 Emergence of an Israeli Social
    [Show full text]
  • Lazarus, Syrkin, Reznikoff, and Roth
    Diaspora and Zionism in Jewish American Literature Brandeis Series in American Jewish History,Culture, and Life Jonathan D. Sarna, Editor Sylvia Barack Fishman, Associate Editor Leon A. Jick, The Americanization of the Synagogue, – Sylvia Barack Fishman, editor, Follow My Footprints: Changing Images of Women in American Jewish Fiction Gerald Tulchinsky, Taking Root: The Origins of the Canadian Jewish Community Shalom Goldman, editor, Hebrew and the Bible in America: The First Two Centuries Marshall Sklare, Observing America’s Jews Reena Sigman Friedman, These Are Our Children: Jewish Orphanages in the United States, – Alan Silverstein, Alternatives to Assimilation: The Response of Reform Judaism to American Culture, – Jack Wertheimer, editor, The American Synagogue: A Sanctuary Transformed Sylvia Barack Fishman, A Breath of Life: Feminism in the American Jewish Community Diane Matza, editor, Sephardic-American Voices: Two Hundred Years of a Literary Legacy Joyce Antler, editor, Talking Back: Images of Jewish Women in American Popular Culture Jack Wertheimer, A People Divided: Judaism in Contemporary America Beth S. Wenger and Jeffrey Shandler, editors, Encounters with the “Holy Land”: Place, Past and Future in American Jewish Culture David Kaufman, Shul with a Pool: The “Synagogue-Center” in American Jewish History Roberta Rosenberg Farber and Chaim I. Waxman,editors, Jews in America: A Contemporary Reader Murray Friedman and Albert D. Chernin, editors, A Second Exodus: The American Movement to Free Soviet Jews Stephen J. Whitfield, In Search of American Jewish Culture Naomi W.Cohen, Jacob H. Schiff: A Study in American Jewish Leadership Barbara Kessel, Suddenly Jewish: Jews Raised as Gentiles Jonathan N. Barron and Eric Murphy Selinger, editors, Jewish American Poetry: Poems, Commentary, and Reflections Steven T.Rosenthal, Irreconcilable Differences: The Waning of the American Jewish Love Affair with Israel Pamela S.
    [Show full text]
  • Zionism and Diaspora in AM Klein's Journalism
    Document generated on 10/01/2021 6:30 p.m. Studies in Canadian Literature / Études en littérature canadienne Exile beyond Return Zionism and Diaspora in A.M. Klein’s Journalism Emily Ballantyne Volume 40, Number 2, 2015 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/scl40_2art09 See table of contents Publisher(s) The University of New Brunswick ISSN 0380-6995 (print) 1718-7850 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Ballantyne, E. (2015). Exile beyond Return: Zionism and Diaspora in A.M. Klein’s Journalism. Studies in Canadian Literature / Études en littérature canadienne, 40(2), 164–188. All rights reserved, © 2015 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Exile beyond Return: Zionism and Diaspora in A.M. Klein’s Journalism Emily Ballantyne oet, lawyer, and journalist A.M. Klein (1902-72) has been well celebrated for his considerable contributions to Jewish Montreal and Canada more broadly. Thanks to the publication Pof his letters in 2011, edited by Elizabeth Popham, the fascinating and complex role played by his non-fiction writing must be reconsidered in light of what she so aptly describes in scare quotes as his “public rela- tions work” (“Introduction” xiii), his dual role as editor of the Canadian Jewish Chronicle and speechwriter/fundraiser for the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC).
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiries Into Economies of Violence in Israel/Palestine
    INQUIRIES INTO ECONOMIES OF VIOLENCE IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DECEMBER 2016 By François-Xavier Plasse-Couture Dissertation committee 1. Michael J. Shapiro, chairperson 2. Kathy Ferguson 3. Jairus Grove 4. Samson Okoth Opondo 5. Laura Lyons Keywords: Israel, Palestine, violence, race, settler colonialism, biopolitics To Anouk, Romy, Mimi, and Laurence, generous, intelligent, unique and loving women who thought me the most and have always been with me, even in difficult times. You are my inspiration. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) for the financial support that made this research possible. Additionally, I want to thank my supervisor and true friend Michael J. Shapiro for his patience, dedication, generosity, support, numerous and precious advices, his friendship, for nurturing such a young and inspiring scholarly open mind and be such a great inspiration. I am grateful to Samson Opondo for his time and generosity, for his wise comments, suggestions, discussions and encouragements on the various projects’ steps, from the proposal to the submission. I am thankful to Jairus Grove, Kathy Ferguson, and Laura Lyons for their useful and constructive comments on the various steps that lead to completion of this dissertation. I am also indebted to Philippe Beaulieu-Brossard, Samuel Vaillancourt, Joan Deas, David Grondin, Ben Schrader, Breanne Gallagher, Katie Brennan, Sharain Naylor, Rex Troumbley, Julia Guimaraes, Akta Kaushal, Noah Viernes, Nicole Grove, John Sweeney, Simon Hogue, Tani Sebro, Jimmy Weir, Yair Geva, Shiri Hornik, Amit Friedman, Avner Peled for their friendship, support, useful comments, suggestions, and generous help at various stages of the project be it during a seminar, a conference, or around a pint.
    [Show full text]
  • ALIYAH to ISRAEL in the 1990S Lessons for the Future PROF
    ALIYAH TO ISRAEL IN THE 1990s Lessons for the Future PROF. JACK HABIB Director, JCD-Broolcdale Institute, Jerusalem and JUDITH KING Director of Researcli on Immigrant Absorption, JDC-Broolcdale Institute, Jerusalem Almost a million immigrants made aliyah to Israel during the 1990s. To meet this massive immigration, Israeli adopted new immigration policies that differed significantly from previous ones. The professional community and Diaspora Jewry played leading roles in introducing programmatic and policy changes and innovations. he decade of the 1990s was a dramatic STRATEGIES AND KEYS TO SUCCESS Tepisode in the history of aliyah to the state of Israel. In this brief article, we discuss The strategies adopted by Israel to meet the nature of the challenge, the strategies the challenge posed by the sheer magnitude adopted, the Diaspora-Israeli partnership, of the immigration represented significant some of the achievements, and remaining departures from previous policies. The pro­ challenges. We conclude with some general fessional community played a leading role in lessons from this experience. identifying the need for change and assisting Israeli society to adopt its strategies to this unique challenge. NATURE OF THE CHALLENGE One of the most significant changes was the shift from the initial absorption of immi­ In the 1990s, 956,000 immigrants came to grants in absorption centers to their direct Israel. Of these, 824,000 were from the FSU integration into the community through their and 40,000 from Ethiopia. Immigrants thus rental or purchase of apartments on the open represented 14 percent of the Israeli popula­ market with government financial assistance. tion at the end of the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Chapter One Making the Desert Bloom: New Jew, Ancient Orient
    Chapter one Making the Desert Bloom: New Jew, Ancient Orient and the Construction of the Sabra 18 1 Chapter O 19 1.1 From Basel to Tel Hai…from Hashomer to the Establishment of the IDF I must train the youth to be soldiers. But only a professional army. Strength: one tenth of the male population: less would not suffice internally. However, I educate one and all to be free and strong men, ready to serve as volunteers if necessary. Education by means of patriotic songs, the Maccabean tradition, religion, heroic stage-plays, honor (Theodor Herzl, 1956). From Basel to Tel Hai... “The nation’s self representation always involves myth about the nation’s creation and about its members” (Mayer, 2000, p.9). According to Mayer, in Zionism, too, as in other nationalisms, myth and memory have been crucial to the construction of the nation. Referring to a hill near .( ציון) The term ‘Zionism’ itself is derived from the biblical word Tzion Jerusalem, this term is symbolic of Eretz Israel , the Land of Israel. The term refers to the ancient patrimony of the Jews which, according to Jewish mythology, was promised by Yahweh to Abraham and his descendents, the ‘Children of Israel”. The first use of the term “Zionism” is attributed to the Austrian Nathan Bimrnbaum, founder of a nationalist Jewish students’ movement called Kadimah . Bimrnbaum first used the term in his journal Selbstemanzipation (Self Emancipation ), published between 1885 and 1894, with some interruptions, and renamed Juedische Volkszeitung in 1894. Zionism does not have a uniform ideology, but has evolved through a dialogue among a plethora of ideologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewriting Israeli History: New Historians and Critical Sociologists
    HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE 1/2018 Rewriting Israeli History: New Historians and Critical Sociologists ADAM COMAN* Revize dějin Izraele: Noví historikové a kritičtí sociologové Abstract: The New Historians and Critical Sociologists were two groups of thinkers who emerged in Israel during the 1980s, strongly criticizing Israeli history and society. Coming from diverse backgrounds and using different methodologies, nonetheless they all shared a highly criti- cal approach towards mainstream historians and sociologists, and, more importantly, towards key moments and issues in Israel’s history. These thinkers blamed the Zionist establishment for ignoring the distress of the European Jews during the Holocaust, committing war crimes against the Arab population during the 1948 War, and abusing immigrants in the years after the state’s independence. These claims raised passionate debates between mainstream and critical scholars, which strongly affected Israeli society. This paper examines the processes that led to the emergence of these thinkers, the novelty of their historical narratives and interpretations, and analyzes the specific terminology they employed, as well as their opponents’ criticisms, which their research provoked. Keywords: Israel; Israeli-Palestinian conflict; historiography; sociology; revisionist history DOI: 10.14712/23363525.2018.41 Introduction Up until the 1980’s, Israeli historiography and sociology reflected, by and large, Isra- el’s mainstream, uncritical, historical and sociological narratives concerning the making of Israel and the Arab-Israeli conflict. The essence of this narrative runs more or less as follows: the 19th century saw a Jewish national revival in Europe, which sought to create a Jewish State in the Land of Israel. However, the land was occupied first by the Ottomans and since 1917 by the British, who objected to the Jews’ resettlement in their motherland.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Author Amos Oz Once Said About His Country
    Prof. Dr. Anat Feinberg Hochschule für jüdische Studien, Heidelberg Hebrew Literature and Israeli History DKFZ, Heidelberg, 18.7.2008 Ladies and Gentlemen, Gvirotai ve-rabotai The best-known Israeli author worldwide, Amos Oz, once said about his country: “This nation was not built on the valour of the army, it was founded on books.” And anyone aware of the role which literature has been playing throughout the turbulant history of the Jewish people and into the present, will doubtlessly agree with him. In a country with over seven million residents, writers are recognised and much-respected figures. They voice their opinion on cultural and political issues and contribute extensively to public discourse. Authors such as Amos Oz, Zeruya Shalev and David Grossman sell well over 80,000 copies of any new title and the weekly bestseller list features older and younger writers, serious and trivial literature, historical novels along with thrillers. One tendency is conscpicuous: More and more Israelis read books in the national language, namely in Hebrew. Indeed, the renaissance of the Hebrew language is to my mind one of most fabulous accomplishments of the Zionist movement. The Hebrew language which for generations was merely a written language, that of the Scriptures and the liturgy, read at best, but hardly spoken, was awakened as it were from its beauty´s sleep and newly moulded in the Jewish Altneuland, to use Theodor Herzl´s name for the new home in Palestine. Indeed, Hebrew has become the language of daily life in Israel, the language which unites immigrants from Russia, Yemen, Germany and the United States, a means of communication as well as the natural fabric of literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel, Zionism, and Emigration Anxiety
    1 Israel, Zionism, and Emigration Anxiety Every Intelligent Israeli understands that the Yerida of Jews from the land of Israel is a national disaster. Almost Holocaust without murder. —Margalit, 2012 n 2012 poet Irit Katz was interviewed in Haaretz upon publication of her Ifirst book,Hibernation , which was written in the United Kingdom. She had left Israel five years earlier. In the interview, the journalist asks Katz how she explains the large number of Israeli emigrants. Katz replies: “I guess they can. It is easier; the discourse of Yordim is no longer there, not as it used to be” (Sela, 2012:14). The journalist then asks Katz if the fact that so many young people are leaving Israel mean Zionism has failed? Katz gives a very interesting answer: “Maybe it’s the success of Zionism. Maybe we became normal and it is allowed to emigrate” (ibid.). In what follows, I wish to explain the cultural context in which this interview takes place. This chapter explores the relationship between Zionism and immigration, as well as the meaning of emigration in the Jewish-Israeli world. Investigating notions of migration under a discourse of failure and success would enable a better understanding of the critique Katz attributes to Zionism. It is not just a simple choice of words, and the question of normality within this context is meaningful. Zionism expressed a dialectical tension between the desire to be normal in the face of anti-Semitism and the desire to retain difference in the face of assimilation (Boyarin, 1997). The question of normality in the Zionist context is not just about the notions of immigration and emigra- tion, aliyah and yerida.
    [Show full text]
  • OZ, YEHOSHUA, and GROSSMAN: POST-ZIONIST NARRATIVES by Copyright 2013 Nitzan Meltzer M.A., University of Kansas 2013
    OZ, YEHOSHUA, AND GROSSMAN: POST-ZIONIST NARRATIVES By Copyright 2013 Nitzan Meltzer M.A., University of Kansas 2013 Submitted to the Department of English and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts __________Cheryl Lester___________ Chairperson ______Byron Caminero-Santangelo____ __________Renee Perelmutter________ Date defended April 17th, 2013 ii The Thesis Committee for Nitzan Meltzer certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: OZ, YEHOSHUA, AND GROSSMAN: POST-ZIONIST NARRATIVES ___________Cheryl Lester__________ Chairperson ___________April 17th 2013_________ Date approved iii Absract Ranen Omer-Sherman has called David Grossman, Amos Oz, and A. B. Yehoshua the three most internationally acclaimed Israeli writers. They are also three secular Israeli men who grew up with the State of Israel, and whose writings reflect the changes in prevailing social attitudes throughout its history. All three authors reveal through their recent work (specifically, novels published in first decade of the 21st century) some aspect of Post-Zionism in literary choices that mark a departure from or a reimagining of the ideologies the modern State was founded upon, and that these authors invariably grew up with. An examination of these Post-Zionist visions is important both in terms of understanding popular cultural trends of the State but also as statements about Israel's place in on a global stage that increasingly contends with questions about the international power structures of the 20th century. The purpose of my thesis is to examine the ways that these authors challenge traditional representations of institutions of Zionism including the kibbutz and the IDF, and how they give unprecedented voice to the various populations that make up the State today, including Arabs and women.
    [Show full text]