DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright by Margaret Kathleen Clark 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyright by Margaret Kathleen Clark 2019 Copyright by Margaret Kathleen Clark 2019 The Dissertation Committee for Margaret Kathleen Clark Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Dissertation: Laying the Groundwork: Soil in the Roman Agricultural Imaginary Committee: Andrew Riggsby, Supervisor Ayelet Haimson Lushkov Adam Rabinowitz Rabun Taylor Timothy Beach Laying the Groundwork: Soil in the Roman Agricultural Imaginary by Margaret Kathleen Clark Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2019 Dedication D.M. JCHB, Sr., KSB, TEC, Sr. and VSC Acknowledgements Completing this dissertation has felt, at times, like a solitary task, as I spent so many hours by myself, with my own thoughts, hammering away at a keyboard. However, in a convoluted way, the isolation I felt sometimes during this process actually speaks to the amount of support, encouragement, and help I received from so many people. I now face the daunting task of trying to acknowledge all those who were alongside me, supporting me in my work. I begin with my committee, who patiently contributed their expertise and guidance. Andrew Riggsby, my supervisor, usually understood what I was trying to say before I could articulate it coherently. His precise questions pushed me to think more clearly about my project. Rabun Taylor stepped in at a moment’s notice and provided helpful feedback in the final stages. Ayelet Haimson-Lushkov is perhaps most responsible for my discovery and subsequent deep affection for agronomist writing, after she half-jokingly suggested in seminar one day that I write a dissertation on Columella. Tim Beach gave me very helpful suggestions as I set out on an exploration of soil science and modern geography scholarship. I only wish that we had come into contact sooner. Adam Rabinowitz always reminded me to think about what questions the evidence I was looking at could actually answer. Although not a final member of my committee, Alice König of the University of St. Andrews gave wonderfully useful feedback earlier in my dissertation process. I extend my sincere thanks to these scholars for all their help over the course of this project. This research was assisted by a Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies. v Others at the University of Texas at Austin have been significant to my development as a scholar. In particular, I would like to thank Alex Walthall for always being willing to listen and bounce ideas around when I dropped by his office. Deborah Beck served as the advisor of my masters report, and her guidance during that process made me a better researcher and writer. I would be remiss to not mention the wonderful staff of the Department of Classics at UT – Beth Chichester, Vanessa Noya, and Khoa Tran. Not only did they make my life easier almost every day, but they are also remarkably warm and kind people. I am so profoundly grateful for their presence and generosity. I extend my thanks to fellow graduate students at UT who been sources of friendship, support, and inspiration. In particular, I must recognize Chuck Oughton, Steve Lundy, Colin Yarbrough, Paul Hay, Andrea Pittard, Becca van der Horst, TJ Bolt, Lizzy Adams, and Jane Millar. It has been a pleasure to get to know you all. Thanks also to Sara Saylor and Sierra Senzaki for leading the best writing groups I joined at the University Writing Center. Before landing at UT, the teachers and faculty mentors I had at other institutions have contributed to this work, directly or indirectly. At the University of Oxford, Henriette van der Blom taught me how to think and write like a historian, and Luke Pitcher advised my masters project on Sallust. Both of them helped me learn how to be a scholar. The community of the Classics Department at Middlebury College embraced me in a way that still gives me warm and fuzzy feelings, and the professors there are among the best scholastic exempla I could have ever had. Their continued enthusiastic support means the world to me. I must also thank Cindy Harrison and Patsy Ricks for setting me on this journey in the first place. Their tireless enthusiasm for Latin and the Roman world have inspired me for over a decade, and I hope I can be as warm and encouraging to my students as they have been to me. Instrumental to my decision to pursue Classics was my experience as a high school junior at School Year Abroad in Viterbo, Italy. I am absolutely still over vi the moon to have written a dissertation that brought me back to central Italy (both in practice and in spirit). I must thank my teachers, fellow students, and host family. That year brought the ancient world to life, but it also brought me to the modern Italy that I love so much. Then, there are the most important people in my life, my family and closest friends. Alice Hargreaves has been a rock star friend for the past almost seven years, and I especially appreciate her understanding when I have forgotten to follow up on Skype dates in the past few months. I will be eternally grateful to my parents, especially for the sacrifices they made in order for me to be able to pursue every educational opportunity I set my sights on. They instilled in me early on a love of learning and reading and the importance of knowing all kinds of history, and they have supported me unconditionally. I cannot say thank you enough. Most of the things I did growing up I did because my sister Susie did them first. Including Latin. I remember her reading aloud a story she was translating for 7th grade Latin homework, and I guessed at the meaning of the words and acted out what I thought was happening. After that, I couldn’t wait to study Latin, and I haven’t stopped. She’s also my oldest friend and has always believed in me. I extend my thanks to her also for bringing Connor into the world just in time for me to put things into perspective while stressing about finishing my dissertation. While living in Austin, I was lucky to have the support of my in-laws (Polly and Bill, and also Ryan and Hallie) who welcomed me into their family and gave me another home. I appreciate the help, support, and encouragement they have given me over these years. Most of all, I thank my husband Will. He never wavered in his belief in me, including the validity of my ideas and goals and my ability to achieve them – even when I was doubtful. He has supported and pushed me every day. Bouncing ideas around with him has made me (and this dissertation) vii immeasurably better. He’s also been understanding when my head has been in the soil. I really am the luckiest. Will et Margaret contra mundum. I dedicate this project to the memory of my grandparents, all of whom have been enormous influences on me, each in their own way. viii Abstract Laying the Groundwork: Soil in the Roman Agricultural Imaginary Margaret Kathleen Clark, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2019 Supervisor: Andrew Riggsby In this dissertation, I examine how soil functions as an integral part of the Roman agricultural imaginary (a shared conceptualization of farming and farmland that informs agricultural practices as well as intellectual approaches and cultural stances towards farming). Farming was integral to the Roman presentation and understanding of Roman culture. Grounded in the stories Romans told about themselves and their history, Roman ideas about agriculture can reveal how reveal how they conceived of Roman values, identities, and imperial expansion. Using the centrality of farming to the Roman worldview as a point of departure, I argue that Roman attitudes towards farmland, particularly soil, evince the agricultural foundations of an imperial habitus. To do so, in the first chapter, I introduce three modes of considering soil that are present in the Roman agricultural imaginary. By looking at soil as a raw material, as an object, and as a place, I argue, Roman sources use soil as a lens or prism for understanding and conveying how interactions between humans and nature reflect the relationship between Rome as an imperialist power and conquered peoples, cultures, landscapes, and natural resources. In Chapter II, I introduce the French concept of terroir as a tool for understanding the differentiation of regional soil types in central Italy. Most often used in ix the context of oenology, terroir outlines how, in addition to local agro-climatic factors, notions of regional identity and tradition affect the agricultural practices and output of a region, which in turn structure conceptualizations of the same regions. I apply the framework of terroir to the characterization of regional soils in three case studies, focusing on Pupinia (an area near Rome with infamously poor soil), the Sabine Hills (one of the first regions conquered by Rome, which becomes synonymous with Rome’s Italian heritage), and the ager Falernus (a wine-growing region in northern Campania, which produces a famous wine and represents the dangers posed to Roman culture by excess and indulgence). I conclude that the ideas about regional soil qualities grew in response to forces which we now categorize as urbanization and globalization, which brought distant regions into more contact with each other. In Chapter III, I apply this framework to Italy as a whole. I show how an emphasis on Italian agricultural superiority – grounded in the soils of the Italian countryside – emerged over the course of the physical expansion of the empire.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petronius' Satyricon Teacher's Manual
    Petronius' Satyricon Mosaic from House with Workshops, Pompeii Selections from Cena Trimalchionis Teacher's Manual Ashley Newman Table of Contents I. Introduction and teaching suggestions……………………...………………….pg 3 II. Lesson plans and handouts……………………………….....……………pgs 4 - 12 III. Large versions of text for overhead………………………………..……..pgs 13-19 IV. English translation…………….…………………………….……………pgs 20-23 V. Multiple choice quiz and key..…………………………………………. pgs 24 -25 VI. Vocabulary Quiz………..…………………………………………………….pg 26 VII. Translation Quest and key..………………………………………………pgs 27-28 VIII. Test and key………………………………………………………………pgs 29-35 IX. Bibliography………………………………………………………………….pg 36 2 Introduction and teaching suggestions The purpose of this teaching project is to guide Latin III students through Petronius' Satyricon with ease. By Latin III, the students should be reading unaltered texts in Latin. It is important that the students read texts written by Romans, instead of teachers. Students can learn information about culture and language from reading the words of the Romans. This project is designed to help young students navigate their way through an authentic text. This unit has been designed to take about 12 days. The lesson plans are laid out for group work. This Petronius project lends itself to be incorporated into a larger Roman author unit. I incorporate Petronius as one of the six Romans authors whom I expose my students during a semester. This unit could be longer. Students could translate and discuss only one page a day with daily review of the previous page. Using the suggested extension activities would also extend the unit. It is important to read and discuss the introduction with the students in order to familiarize them with the time period, author, and genre of the Satyricon.
    [Show full text]
  • Iambic Metapoetics in Horace, Epodes 8 and 12 Erika Zimmerman Damer University of Richmond, [email protected]
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Classical Studies Faculty Publications Classical Studies 2016 Iambic Metapoetics in Horace, Epodes 8 and 12 Erika Zimmerman Damer University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/classicalstudies-faculty- publications Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Damer, Erika Zimmermann. "Iambic Metapoetics in Horace, Epodes 8 and 12." Helios 43, no. 1 (2016): 55-85. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classical Studies at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classical Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Iambic Metapoetics in Horace, Epodes 8 and 12 ERIKA ZIMMERMANN DAMER When in Book 1 of his Epistles Horace reflects back upon the beginning of his career in lyric poetry, he celebrates his adaptation of Archilochean iambos to the Latin language. He further states that while he followed the meter and spirit of Archilochus, his own iambi did not follow the matter and attacking words that drove the daughters of Lycambes to commit suicide (Epist. 1.19.23–5, 31).1 The paired erotic invectives, Epodes 8 and 12, however, thematize the poet’s sexual impotence and his disgust dur- ing encounters with a repulsive sexual partner. The tone of these Epodes is unmistakably that of harsh invective, and the virulent targeting of the mulieres’ revolting bodies is precisely in line with an Archilochean poetics that uses sexually-explicit, graphic obscenities as well as animal compari- sons for the sake of a poetic attack.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 19 Greek, Carthaginian, and Roman Agricultural Writers
    Lecture 19 1 Lecture 19 Greek, Carthaginian, and Roman Agricultural Writers Our knowledge of the agricultural practices of Greece and Rome are based on writings of the period. There were an enormous number of writings on agriculture, although most of them are lost we know about them from references made by others. Theophrastus of Eresos (387–287 BCE) The two botanical treatises of Theophrastus are the greatest treasury of botanical and horticultural information from antiquity and represent the culmination of a millenium of experience, observation, and science from Egypt and Mesopotamia. The fi rst work, known by its Latin title, Historia de Plantis (Enquiry into Plants), and composed of nine books (chapters is a better term), is largely descriptive. The second treatise, De Causis Plantarum (Of Plants, an Explanation), is more philosophic, as indicated by the title. The works are lecture notes rather than textbooks and were presumably under continual revision. The earliest extant manuscript, Codex Urbinas of the Vatican Library, dates from the 11th century and contains both treatises. Although there have been numerous editions, translations, and commentaries, Theophrastus the only published translation in En glish of Historia de Plantis is by (appropriately) Sir Arthur Hort (1916) and of De Causis Plantarum is by Benedict Einarson and George K.K. Link (1976). Both are available as volumes of the Loeb Classical Library. Theophrastus (divine speaker), the son of a fuller (dry cleaner using clay), was born at Eresos, Lesbos, about 371 BCE and lived to be 85. His original name, Tyrtamos, was changed by Aristotle because of his oratorical gifts.
    [Show full text]
  • “At the Sight of the City Utterly Perishing Amidst the Flames Scipio Burst Into
    Aurelii are one of the three major Human subgroups within western Eramus, and the founders of the mighty (some say “Eternal”) “At the sight of the city utterly perishing Aurelian Empire. They are a sturdy, amidst the flames Scipio burst into tears, conservative group, prone to religious fervor and stood long reflecting on the inevitable and philosophical revelry in equal measure. change which awaits cities, nations, and Adding to this a taste for conquest, and is it dynasties, one and all, as it does every one any wonder the Aurelii spread their of us men. This, he thought, had befallen influence, like a mighty eagle spreading its Ilium, once a powerful city, and the once wings, across the known world? mighty empires of the Assyrians, Medes, Persians, and that of Macedonia lately so splendid. And unintentionally or purposely he quoted---the words perhaps escaping him Aurelii stand a head shorter than most unconsciously--- other humans, but their tightly packed "The day shall be when holy Troy shall forms hold enough muscle for a man twice fall their height. Their physical endurance is And Priam, lord of spears, and Priam's legendary amongst human and elf alike. folk." Only the Brutum are said to be hardier, And on my asking him boldly (for I had and even then most would place money on been his tutor) what he meant by these the immovable Aurelian. words, he did not name Rome distinctly, but Skin color among the Aurelii is quite was evidently fearing for her, from this sight fluid, running from pale to various shades of the mutability of human affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Literature from Its Earliest Period to the Augustan Age
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of History of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan Age. Volume I by John Dunlop This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: History of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan Age. Volume I Author: John Dunlop Release Date: April 1, 2011 [Ebook 35750] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK HISTORY OF ROMAN LITERATURE FROM ITS EARLIEST PERIOD TO THE AUGUSTAN AGE. VOLUME I*** HISTORY OF ROMAN LITERATURE, FROM ITS EARLIEST PERIOD TO THE AUGUSTAN AGE. IN TWO VOLUMES. BY John Dunlop, AUTHOR OF THE HISTORY OF FICTION. ivHistory of Roman Literature from its Earliest Period to the Augustan Age. Volume I FROM THE LAST LONDON EDITION. VOL. I. PUBLISHED BY E. LITTELL, CHESTNUT STREET, PHILADELPHIA. G. & C. CARVILL, BROADWAY, NEW YORK. 1827 James Kay, Jun. Printer, S. E. Corner of Race & Sixth Streets, Philadelphia. Contents. Preface . ix Etruria . 11 Livius Andronicus . 49 Cneius Nævius . 55 Ennius . 63 Plautus . 108 Cæcilius . 202 Afranius . 204 Luscius Lavinius . 206 Trabea . 209 Terence . 211 Pacuvius . 256 Attius . 262 Satire . 286 Lucilius . 294 Titus Lucretius Carus . 311 Caius Valerius Catullus . 340 Valerius Ædituus . 411 Laberius . 418 Publius Syrus . 423 Index . 453 Transcriber's note . 457 [iii] PREFACE. There are few subjects on which a greater number of laborious volumes have been compiled, than the History and Antiquities of ROME.
    [Show full text]
  • Catullus, As Can’T Be Counted by Spies Nor an Evil Tongue Bewitch Us
    &$78//867+(32(06 7UDQVODWHGE\$6.OLQH ã Copyright 2001 A. S. Kline, All Rights Reserved This work may be freely reproduced, stored and transmitted, electronically or otherwise, for any NON-COMMERCIAL purpose. 2 &RQWHQWV 1. The Dedication: to Cornelius............................... 8 2. Tears for Lesbia’s Sparrow.................................. 9 2b. Atalanta.............................................................. 9 3. The Death of Lesbia’s Sparrow ......................... 10 4. His Boat ............................................................ 11 5. Let’s Live and Love: to Lesbia .......................... 13 6. Flavius’s Girl: to Flavius ................................... 14 7. How Many Kisses: to Lesbia ............................. 15 8. Advice: to himself.............................................. 16 9. Back from Spain: to Veranius............................ 17 10. Home Truths for Varus’s girl: to Varus........... 18 11. Words against Lesbia: to Furius and Aurelius . 19 12. Stop Stealing the Napkins! : to Asinius Marrucinus............................................................. 21 13. Invitation: to Fabullus...................................... 22 14. What a Book! : to Calvus the Poet................... 23 15. A Warning: to Aurelius.................................... 25 16. A Rebuke: to Aurelius and Furius.................... 26 17. The Town of Cologna Veneta.......................... 27 21. Greedy: To Aurelius. ....................................... 30 22. People Who Live in Glass Houses: to Varus ... 31
    [Show full text]
  • Greek and Roman Mythology and Heroic Legend
    G RE E K AN D ROMAN M YTH O LOGY AN D H E R O I C LE GEN D By E D I N P ROFES SOR H . ST U G Translated from th e German and edited b y A M D i . A D TT . L tt LI ONEL B RN E , , TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE S Y a l TUD of Greek religion needs no po ogy , and should This mus v n need no bush . all t feel who ha e looked upo the ns ns and n creatio of the art it i pired . But to purify stre gthen admiration by the higher light of knowledge is no work o f ea se . No truth is more vital than the seemi ng paradox whi c h - declares that Greek myths are not nature myths . The ape - is not further removed from the man than is the nature myth from the religious fancy of the Greeks as we meet them in s Greek is and hi tory . The myth the child of the devout lovely imagi nation o f the noble rac e that dwelt around the e e s n s s u s A ga an. Coar e fa ta ie of br ti h forefathers in their Northern homes softened beneath the southern sun into a pure and u and s godly bea ty, thus gave birth to the divine form of n Hellenic religio . M c an c u s m c an s Comparative ythology tea h uch . It hew how god s are born in the mind o f the savage and moulded c nn into his image .
    [Show full text]
  • Try the Wine: Food As an Expression of Cultural Identity in Roman Britain
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-2020 Try the Wine: Food as an Expression of Cultural Identity in Roman Britain Molly Reininger Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Reininger, Molly, "Try the Wine: Food as an Expression of Cultural Identity in Roman Britain" (2020). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7867. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7867 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRY THE WINE: FOOD AS AN EXPRESSION OF CULTURAL IDENTITY IN ROMAN BRITAIN by Molly Reininger A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF THE ARTS in History Approved: ______________________ ______________________ Frances Titchener, Ph.D . Seth Archer, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ ______________________ Susan Cogan, Ph.D. Gabriele Ciciurkaite, Ph.D. Committee Member Outside Committee Member ______________________ Janis L. Boettinger, Ph.D. Acting Vice Provost of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2020 ii Copyright © Molly Reininger 2020 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Try the Wine: Food as an Expression of Cultural Identity in Roman Britain by Molly Reininger, Master of the Arts Utah State University, 2020 Major Professor: Dr. Frances Titchener Department: History This thesis explores the relationship between goods imported from Rome to Britannia, starting from the British Iron Age to the Late Antique period, and how their presence in the province affected how those living within viewed their cultural identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaestiones Onomatologae
    929.4 N397q Digitized by tlie Internet Arcliive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/quaestionesonomaOOneum UINIV|R§ITY OF UReANA<$HAMPAlG.M CCASSICS DISSEETATIO INAVGVRALIS QVAM AVCTORITATE ET CONSENSV AMPLISSIMI PHILOSOPHORVM IN ACADEMIA PHILIPPINA MARPVRGENSI ORDINIS AD SVMMOS IN PHILOSOPHIA HONORES RITE CAPESSENDOS SCRIPSIT RVDOLF NEVMANN COLBERGENsfs (BORVSSVS) MARPURGI CATTORUM TYPIS CAROLI GEORGI TYPOGRAPHI ACADEMICI MCMXV Dissertatio ab aniplissimo pbilosoplionim ordiue referente ERNESTO MAASS probata est a. d. lil. ID. DEC. anni hr/nied in Germany Patri optimo THEODORO NEVMANN Colbergensi has studiorum primitias d. d. d. (lie natali sexagesimo sexto a. d. X. Kal. Quint. anni 1914 gratissimus filius Capitiim elenchiis I Nomina Graecorum propria a flnminibus dcrivata 1 Hominum nomina 2 Gentilicia apud IUyrios in Magna Graecia apud Romanos Gallos Hispanos Graecos Thraces Scythas in Asia Minore apud Orientales II 1 Nomina propria a fluviis ducta in Aeneide a fluviis Ita- liae Mag-nae Graeciae Siciliae Galliae Graeciae Asiae Minoris Thraciae Orientis 2 Nomina propria a fluminibus sumpta in SiH Italici Punicis a) Poenorum eorumque auxiliorum a fluviis Africae Asiae Minoris Hispaniae Italiae et Siciliae Susianae Sarmatiae b) Hispanorum a fluviis Hispaniae Asiae Minoris c) Celtarum ab amnibus Gallieis d) Saguntinorum a fluviis Hispaniae Mag-nae Graeciae Aetoliae .Asiae Minoris e) Romanorum a fluviis Galliae Italiae Asiae Minoris . III 1 Graecorum nomina in Aeneide 2 Lyciorum 3 Phrygum Mysorum Lydorum Bithynorum 4 Troianorum a) Graeca b)
    [Show full text]
  • Zur Antiken Georgica—Rezeption
    ZUR ANTIKEN GEORGICA—REZEPTION Mitunter geben antike Leser der Georgica zu erkennen, welche Hauptaussagen ihnen das Werk zu enthalten schien. Im folgenden geht es also um diejenigen der vielen antiken Georgica-Erwähnungen und ­Zitate, die direkt oder indirekt eine Auffassung des Gesamtwerkes verraten. Im Mittelpunkt sollen Äußerungen des ersten Jahrhunderts nach Chr. stehen. Die Untersuchung ist im wesentlichen zwei­ geteilt: (I) Georgica­Rezeption bei Laien, (II) Georgica­Rezeption bei Landwirt­ schaftsspezialisten. In einer abschließenden Überlegung sollen kurz einige Folge­ rungen für die moderne Interpretation erörtert werden (III). I Zunächst ein Beispiel aus Quintilian: beim ersten Unterricht darf man nicht zu streng sein — sonst entmutigt man die Anfänger (inst. 2,4,11). Das wird von Quintilian mit einer Virgil­Reminiszenz verdeutlicht. Der Dichter hatte gelehrt (G 2,362­70), einjährige Weinstöcke dürfe man noch nicht mit dem Messer be­ schneiden — Begründung: ante reformidant ferrum. Quintilian wendet das nun auf die Schüler an ­ erstaunlicherweise aber nicht als Virgilbezug, sondern als Bauern­ wissen: ,JJas wissen auch die Landleute" — quod etiam rusticis notum est — „die glauben, an das zarte Laub dürfe man noch nicht die Sichel anlegen, weil es das Eisen offenbar scheut" —quia reformidare ferrum videntur. Die virgilischen Entleh­ nungen sind (auch über das hier gegebene Virgilzitat hinaus) deutlich, aber Virgils Lehre wird von Quintilian völlig mit Bauernwissen identifiziert; der Name Virgils erscheint nicht. Für unser modernes Georgica­Verständnis ist es überraschend, daß Virgil sozusagen nur noch als Quelle für bäuerliches Fachwissen gelten soll. Dieser volksnahe und fachliche Aspekt ist modernen Interpreten wohl ganz verborgen ge­ blieben, wenn sie die Georgica ausschließlich als ein kompliziertes Werk für eine hochgebüdete Leserschaft deuten.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Anti-Roman? Sallust and Pompeius Trogus on Mithridates." Classical Journal 101.4 (N.D.): 383-407
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Classics Faculty Publications Classics Department 4-2006 Who’s Anti-Roman? Sallust and Pompeius Trogus on Mithridates Eric Adler Connecticut College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/classfacpub Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Adler, E. "Who's Anti-Roman? Sallust And Pompeius Trogus On Mithridates." Classical Journal 101.4 (n.d.): 383-407. Web. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Classics Department at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Classics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. WHO'S ANTI-ROMAN? SALLUST AND POMPEIUS TROGUS ON MITHRIDATES Abstract: Contemporary scholars of Roman imperialism have discussed the ways in which ancient historians denigrate non-Romans and thereby present intellectual justificationsfor Roman conquest. This paper offers a case study that questions this position's validity: an examination of Sallust's Epistula Mithridatis (Hist. 4.69M) and Pompeius Trogus' speech of Mithridates (Justin 38.4-7). I argue that Sallust offers a more powerful attack on Roman foreign policy than does Trogus, whom many scholars have deemed "anti-Roman," and conclude that Roman historiansare capable of using
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Archival Records at Rome in the Fourth Century BCE
    Foundations of History: The Emergence of Archival Records at Rome in the Fourth Century BCE by Zachary B. Hallock A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor David Potter, Chair Associate Professor Benjamin Fortson Assistant Professor Brendan Haug Professor Nicola Terrenato Zachary B. Hallock [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0337-0181 © 2018 by Zachary B. Hallock To my parents for their endless love and support ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Rackham Graduate School and the Departments of Classics and History for providing me with the resources and support that made my time as a graduate student comfortable and enjoyable. I would also like to express my gratitude to the professors of these departments who made themselves and their expertise abundantly available. Their mentoring and guidance proved invaluable and have shaped my approach to solving the problems of the past. I am an immensely better thinker and teacher through their efforts. I would also like to express my appreciation to my committee, whose diligence and attention made this project possible. I will be forever in their debt for the time they committed to reading and discussing my work. I would particularly like to thank my chair, David Potter, who has acted as a mentor and guide throughout my time at Michigan and has had the greatest role in making me the scholar that I am today. Finally, I would like to thank my wife, Andrea, who has been and will always be my greatest interlocutor.
    [Show full text]