DOCSLIB.ORG

Victims of Yalta: the Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944Ndash;1947 Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Victims of Yalta: the Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944Ndash;1947 Online MbiuN [Library ebook] Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 Online [MbiuN.ebook] Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 Pdf Free Nikolai Tolstoy *Download PDF | ePub | DOC | audiobook | ebooks Download Now Free Download Here Download eBook #205930 in eBooks 2013-08-06 2013-08-06File Name: B00A62UR0A | File size: 76.Mb Nikolai Tolstoy : Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947: 0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Five StarsBy Mr. Marcin Z. GruszeckiSweet!29 of 29 people found the following review helpful. A Forgotten Tragedy of World War IIBy John Wear"Victims of Yalta" by Nikolai Tolstoy tells the story of over three million Russians stranded in Allied-controlled territory at the end of World War II. Some of these Russians were prisoners of war (POWs), while others were anti-Communist fighters who had fought on the side of Germany. In a secret agreement later confirmed by Winston Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt, and Joseph Stalin at Yalta, these Russian soldiers were condemned to be sent back without choice to the USSR. Knowing that torture and death lay ahead of them, many of these Russians chose to end their own lives before returning to the Soviet Union.Soviet prisoners at German camps who were to be repatriated to the Soviet Union after the war often begged to be shot on the spot rather than be delivered into the hands of the Soviet NKVD. Other Soviet prisoners at German camps committed suicide so as not to be tortured and executed by the Soviets. A shock force of 500 American and Polish guards was required at Dachau to forcibly repatriate the first group of Soviet prisoners to the Soviet Union. What followed is described on page 355 of Tolstoy's book in a report submitted to Robert Murphy:Conforming to agreements with the Soviets, an attempt was made to entrain 399 former Russian soldiers who had been captured in German uniform, from the assembly center at Dachau on Saturday, January 19 [1946]. All of these men refused to entrain. They begged to be shot. They resisted entrainment by taking off their clothing and refusing to leave their quarters. It was necessary to use tear-gas and some force to drive them out. Tear-gas forced them out of the building into the snow where those who had cut and stabbed themselves fell exhausted and bleeding in the snow. Nine men hanged themselves and one had stabbed himself to death and one other who had stabbed himself subsequently died; while 20 others are still in the hospital from self-inflicted wounds. The entrainment was finally effected of 368 men who were set off accompanied by a Russian liaison officer on a train carrying American guards. Six men escaped en route.The report ended: "The incident was shocking. There is considerable dissatisfaction on the part of the American officers and men that they are being required by the American Government to repatriate these Russians..." Thus, for most Soviet POWs, being shot in a German concentration camp was far preferable to being tortured and executed on their return to the Soviet Union."Victims of Yalta" also explains on pages 33-35 that Stalin abandoned all Soviet POWs during the war. The Soviet Union was not a party to The Hague Conventions. Nor was the Soviet Union a signatory of the Geneva Convention of 1929, which defined more precisely the conditions to be accorded POWs. Germany nevertheless approached the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) immediately after war broke out with the Soviet Union to attempt to regulate the conditions of prisoners on both sides. The ICRC contacted Soviet ambassadors in London and Sweden, but the Soviet leaders in Moscow refused to cooperate. Germany also sent lists of their Russian prisoners to the Soviet government until September 1941. The German government eventually stopped sending these lists in response to the Soviet Union's refusal to reciprocate.Over the winter Germany made further efforts to establish relations with the Soviets in an attempt to introduce the provisions of The Hague and Geneva Conventions concerning POWs. Germany was rebuffed again. Hitler himself made an appeal to Stalin for prisoners' postal services and urged Red Cross inspection of the camps. Stalin responded: "There are no Russian prisoners of war. The Russian soldier fights on till death. If he chooses to become a prisoner, he is automatically excluded from the Russian community. We are not interested in a postal service only for Germans."The death of millions of Russian POWs in German captivity constitutes one of the major tragedies of the Second World War. However, much of the blame for the terrible fate of these Soviet soldiers was due to the inflexibly cruel policies of Joseph Stalin. A major portion of the Soviet POWs who died from hunger could have been saved had Stalin not called them traitors and denied them the right to live. By preventing the ICRC from distributing food to the Soviet POWs in German captivity, Stalin needlessly caused the death of a large percentage of these Soviet POWs.A Red Army sergeant who was captured by the Germans when his unconscious body was dug out from the ruins of Odessa later joined Gen. Andrei Vlasov's Russian Liberation Army. The sergeant bitterly complains on page 41 of the Soviet Union's betrayal of its POWs:Tell me, why did the Soviet Government forsake us? Why did it forsake millions of prisoners? We saw prisoners of all nationalities, and they were taken care of. Through the Red Cross they received parcels and letters from home; only the Russians received nothing. In Kassel I saw American Negro prisoners, and they shared their cakes and chocolates with us. Then why didn't the Soviet Government, which we considered our own, send us at least some plain hard tack?... Hadn't we fought? Hadn't we defended the Government? Hadn't we fought for our country? If Stalin refused to have anything to do with us, we didn't want to have anything to do with Stalin!Tolstoy in "Victims of Yalta" produces strong arguments that the repatriation of Soviet POWs was not necessary. Tolstoy states on page 410, "So strong was the European tradition of granting political asylum that no nation before 1939 appears even to have contemplated compelling the return home of citizens whose lives or liberty might be endangered." Tragically, however, British and American leaders forced repatriation of Soviet POWs in order to maintain good relations with Stalin and the Soviet Union. The repatriation of the Soviet POWs can be seen as a policy of appeasement that at the time was thought to be in the best interests of the United States and Great Britain.I recommend "Victims of Yalta" to anyone interested in the history of World War II and its aftermath. The story is tragic and disturbing, but historically important and frequently unreported by historians.17 of 17 people found the following review helpful. An excelent study of a long-silenced shameful episodeBy Paulino Serrano ValeroI bought the previous edition back in 1983 and lost it. Extremely glad it has been reissued end even happier about the building of the monument to the Victims of Yalta.The book shows how shameless politicos may be. Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler amounts to fierce resistance when compared to Churchill's and Eden's submissiveness to Stalin. In my opinion Churchill (as proven by his stint as Primer Minister in the early 50s) didn't want no recognize that Britain was no longer the Supreme Power, while Chamberlain realized that. One of the most tragic episodes of World War IImdash;the forced repatriation of two million Russian POWs to certain doom.At the end of the Second World War, a secret Moscow agreement that was confirmed at the 1945 Yalta Conference ordered the forcible repatriation of millions of Soviet citizens that had fallen into German hands, including prisoners of war, refugees, and forced laborers. For many, the order was a death sentence, as citizens returned to find themselves executed or placed back in forced-labor camps. Tolstoy condemns the complicity of the British, who ldquo;ardently followedrdquo; the repatriation orders. ldquo;Finally the history of a cruel betrayal on the part of the West of millions of helpless people is being told and exposed. Exposure can no longer save any of the victims, but it can be a warning for the future.rdquo;mdash;Alexander Solzhenitsyn [MbiuN.ebook] Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 By Nikolai Tolstoy PDF [MbiuN.ebook] Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 By Nikolai Tolstoy Epub [MbiuN.ebook] Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 By Nikolai Tolstoy Ebook [MbiuN.ebook] Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 By Nikolai Tolstoy Rar [MbiuN.ebook] Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 By Nikolai Tolstoy Zip [MbiuN.ebook] Victims of Yalta: The Secret Betrayal of the Allies, 1944ndash;1947 By Nikolai Tolstoy Read Online.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Izručenja I Sudbine Zarobljenika Smještenih U Savezničkim Logorima U Svibnju 1945
    ČSP, br. 2., 391.-416. Zagreb, 2009. UDK: 355.257.7(497.1=163.42)’’1945’’ 341.322.5(497.1)’’1945’’ 327(497.1)’’1945’’ Izvorni znanstveni članak Primljeno: 29. 6. 2007. Prihvaćeno: 4. 7. 2008. Izručenja i sudbine zarobljenika smještenih u savezničkim logorima u svibnju 1945. MARTINA GRAHEK RAVANČIĆ Hrvatski institut za povijest, Zagreb, Republika Hrvatska U radu se nudi kraći osvrt na sudbine izručenih i prisilno repatriranih zarobljenika (pri- padnika vojnih snaga i civila), koji su u neposrednoj završnici Drugoga svjetskoga rata, bježeći pred jedinicama Jugoslavenske armije, primljeni i smješteni u savezničke logore za “predano neprijateljsko osoblje” tj. za “raseljeno osoblje”. Ključne riječi: Drugi svjetski rat, zarobljenici, prisilne repatrijacije, logori, žrtve, Zapad- ni saveznici Sporni događaji vraćaju nas u dane s kraja Drugoga svjetskoga rata u koji- ma pobjednici imaju primat i kroje oblik “novog svijeta”. Naći se na strani po- raženih značilo je iščekivati nepoznatu budućnost. U tom kontekstu našlo se i mnoštvo čije sudbine i danas obilježava bleiburška tragedija. Početkom svibnja 1945. kraj Drugoga svjetskog rata bio je samo pitanje dana. Političke i ratne prilike obilježene su stalnim nadiranjem savezničkih snaga, praćenih jedinica- ma Jugoslavenske armije (JA), te konstantnim sužavanjem linije bojišnice na prostoru Nezavisne Države Hrvatske (NDH).1 Zbog nedostatka naoružanja i općeg povlačenja postrojbi Trećeg Reicha s Balkana, Oružane snage NDH (OS NDH) našle su se u prilično nezavidnom položaju, pa je stoga donesena od- luka o općem povlačenju prema Zapadu. Gotovo istovremeno Josip Broz Tito naredio je zapovjednicima četiriju armija JA da “oslobodi jugoslovenske naro- de na njihovoj cjelokupnoj etničkoj teritoriji zaključno sa Istrom, Slovenačkim primorjem i Koruškom i okruži, prinudi na kapitulaciju ili uništi glavne snage okupatora i njihovih suradnika, koje su se u proleće 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Designs and Crooked Purposes Forced Repatriations of Cossacks and Yugoslav Nationals in 1945
    Close Designs and Crooked Purposes Forced Repatriations of Cossacks and Yugoslav Nationals in 1945 Nikolai Tolstoy Introduction by Charles Crawford Editor's Note: This Occasional Paper is the transcript of a discussion at the CRCE in 2011. I am grateful to Annie Beadle and Valeria Eapen for their editorial assistance. In July 1995, the European Court of Human Rights concluded unanimously that the Brit- ish Government had violated Tolstoy’s rights in respect of Article 10 of the Convention on Human Rights, although this referred strictly to the amount of the damages awarded against him and did not overturn the guilty verdict of his libel action. The Times commented in a leading article: In its judgment yesterday in the case of Count Nikolai Tolstoy, the European Court of Human Rights ruled against Britain in important respects, finding that the award of £1.5 million levelled against the Count by a jury in 1989 amounted to a violation of his freedom of expression. Parlia- ment will find the implications of this decision difficult to ignore. The Constitution of the CRCE requires that its Trustees and Advisers dissociate them- selves from the analysis contained in its publications, but it is hoped that readers will find this study of value and interest. © Nikolai Tolstoy-Miloslavsky, May 2012 All rights reserved Occasional Paper 16 ISBN: 978-0-948027-65-9 Centre for Research into Post-Communist Economies 57 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL [email protected] www.crce.org.uk Printed in Great Britain by IMS Limited, Selsey, Chichester PO20 OAF CLOSE DESIGNS AND CROOKED PURPOSES Forced Repatriations of Cossacks and Yugoslav Nationals in 1945 Based on a CRCE Discussion with Nikolai Tolstoy In the Chair: Charles Crawford CMG, March 2011 Thank you all for coming.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Case of Tolstoy Miloslavsky V. the United Kingdom (1)
    In the case of Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom (1), The European Court of Human Rights, sitting, in accordance with Article 43 (art. 43) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") and the relevant provisions of Rules of Court A (2), as a Chamber composed of the following judges: Mr R. Ryssdal, President, Mr B. Walsh, Mr C. Russo, Mrs E. Palm, Mr I. Foighel, Mr R. Pekkanen, Sir John Freeland, Mr B. Repik, Mr P. Jambrek, and also of Mr H. Petzold, Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 26 January, 24 February and 23 June 1995, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: _______________ Notes by the Registrar 1. The case is numbered 8/1994/455/536. The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number). The last two numbers indicate the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications to the Commission. 2. Rules A apply to all cases referred to the Court before the entry into force of Protocol No. 9 (P9) and thereafter only to cases concerning States not bound by that Protocol (P9). They correspond to the Rules that came into force on 1 January 1983, as amended several times subsequently. _______________ PROCEDURE 1. The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission") on 11 March 1994, within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 para.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Non-Violence
    The Origins of Non-violence Tolstoy and Gandhi in Their Historical Settings Martin Green The Origins of Non-violence This book describes the world-historical forces, acting on the periphery of the modern world—in Russia in the nineteenth century—which developed the idea of nonviolence in Tolstoy and then in Gandhi. It was from Tolstoy that Gandhi first learned of this idea, but those world-historical forces acted upon and through both men. The shape of the book is a convergence, the coming together of two widely separate lives, under the stress of history. The lives of Tolstoy and Gandhi begin at widely separate points— of time, of place, of social origin, of talent and of conviction; in the course of their lives, they become, respectively, military officer and novelist, and lawyer and political organizer. They win fame in those roles; but in the last two decades of their lives, they occupy the same special space—ascetic/saint/prophet. Tolstoy and Gandhi were at first agents of modern reform, in Russia and India. But then they became rebels against it and led a profound resistance—a resistance spiritually rooted in the traditionalism of myriad peasant villages. The book’s scope and sweep are enormous. Green has made history into an absorbing myth—a compelling and moving story of importance to all scholars and readers concerned with the history of ideas. www.mkgandhi.org Page 1 The Origins of Non-violence Preface This book tells how the modern version of nonviolence—and Satyagraha, and war-resistance, and one kind of anti-imperialism, even— were in effect invented by Tolstoy and Gandhi.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-World War Ii Forced Repatriations to Yugoslavia: Genocide's Legacy for Democratic Nation Building
    International Journal of Social Sciences Vol. VII, No. 2 / 2018 DOI: 10.20472/SS.2018.7.2.004 POST-WORLD WAR II FORCED REPATRIATIONS TO YUGOSLAVIA: GENOCIDE'S LEGACY FOR DEMOCRATIC NATION BUILDING DOROTHY S. MCCLELLAN, NIKOLA KNEZ Abstract: This paper examines the long-term challenges to democratic nation building that have resulted from the forced repatriation of hundreds of thousands of Croatian civilians and military personnel to Yugoslavia at the end of World War II. Data suggest that violations of the Geneva Conventions led to the death of many of these asylum seekers at the hands of Tito's Partisans in death marches and mass executions. Through analysis of historical documents, newly released evidence of mass graves, and interviews with survivors/witnesses, confessed perpetrators, military officials and scholars, we examine the atrocities in the context of international human rights law, with discussion of subsequent promulgation of protocols for the protection of refugees, asylum seekers, and prisoners of war from crimes against humanity and genocide. Keywords: forced repatriation, genocide, international law, democracy, violations of international law, Geneva Conventions, asylum seekers, communist crimes, Yugoslavia, human rights, prisoners of war JEL Classification: K33, K42, D74 Authors: DOROTHY S. MCCLELLAN, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, United States, Email: [email protected] NIKOLA KNEZ, 21st Century Society for Human Rights & Education, United States, Email: [email protected] Citation: DOROTHY S. MCCLELLAN, NIKOLA KNEZ (2018). Post-World War II Forced Repatriations to Yugoslavia: Genocide's Legacy for Democratic Nation Building. International Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. VII(2), pp. 62-91., 10.20472/SS.2018.7.2.004 Copyright © 2018, DOROTHY S.
    [Show full text]
  • ''Forced Repatriation to the Soviet Union: the Secret Betrayal" Nikolai Tolstoy
    Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan 49242 December 1988 Volume 17, No. 12 ''Forced Repatriation to the Soviet Union: The Secret Betrayal" Nikolai Tolstoy Editor's Preview: At the end of World War through their villages in flower-strewn II, two million Russians-including White glory. Russians, Cossacks, Slovenians, Croats and What happened to the Russian POWs Serbs who were POWs or simply living in after that, however, was far from glorious. exile-were forcibly repatriated to the They were thrown into wired camps on Soviet Union. Men, women and children the open steppe. During the cruel winter were turned over to the Russian secret of 1941-42, without shelter or proper food, police at gunpoint. Non-Soviet citizens were millions died. This is a Nazi war crime, supposedly exempt, but historian Count undeniably, but it is not one which should Nikolai Tolstoy charges that they were be laid exclusively at Hitler's door. secretly betrayed by a few key military of­ During World War I, Russian prisoners ficials, a future British prime minister received the same treatment as the British, among them. French and American troops; they were all This tragedy, although nearly a half­ signatories of the Hague Convention. Iron­ century old, ought not be forgotten. What ically, it was not Imperial Russia under Czar happened in 1944-47 was more than a Nicholas II which refused to be bound by sinister episode. Even in this era of the Hague agreement but the new Soviet ''glasnost,'' the Soviet Union still denies regime which supplanted it in 1917. Twelve freedom of emigration, one of the most ( ( \ years later, the world powers reached a fundamental human rights, to its people.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolai Tolstoy Gustavo Gutierrez As the Star of Peruvian Theology, to Launch the Theology of Liberation in America."
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 21, Number 27, July 1, 1994 1967 the Faith and Security Institute . and who served ...thanks to the Escorial Encounter in 1972, attended by Interview: Nikolai Tolstoy Gustavo Gutierrez as the star of Peruvian theology, to launch the theology of liberation in America." Armed theology of liberation The relation of the terrorists of ETA to the liberationist networks is only one indication of the symbiosis between the terrorist apparatus and liberation theology.This brotherhood 'We will demand the was consecrated, especially starting in 1987, afterthe famous enterview of Fray Betto with Fidel Castro published in the book Fidel and Religion. After that point, Fray Betto, anoth­ truth about the er well-known liberationist priest in Brazil, was turned into the main interlocutor of the Cuban dictator with the theology Bleiburg massacre' of liberation, as well as one of the main "spiritual" advisers of the PT candidate for the presidency of Brazil, Luis Inacio The following interview with the Pritish historian Nikolai "Lula" da Silva. Tolstoy originally appeared in the C1'Oatiandaily newspaper In that year, when the collapse of communism was on the Slobodna Dalmacija.Both interviewer and interviewee have horizon, Fidel Castro, together with Mexican Bishop Samuel granted EIR permission to reproduf;e it here in full. along Ruiz (the Zapatista commander) and the later bishop of Cuer­ with the following introduction. navaca Sergio Mendez Arceo, forerunner of the union of theology with liberation, organized in Havana in late May With his book about the huge public execution by Josip Broz the Third Continental Congress of the Christian Movement Tito's Partisans of Croatian soldiers and civilians in 1945, for Peace, Independence, and the Progress of Peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Skating on Thin Ice? Russia Joins The
    MOSCOW JANUARY 2012 www.passportmagazine.ru Skating on Thin Ice? Roman Abramovich in Court Russia Joins the WTO Things to Do Over the Winter Escape to Ecuador Super Soup January_covers.indd 1 16.12.2011 11:26:54 January_covers.indd 2 16.12.2011 11:47:52 Contents 4. Previews Aline Kalinina 10. Theatre Review Marina Lukanina 4 12. Legal Alexander Ksenofontov 14. Literary Moscow The Museum Flat of Alexei Tolstoy, Marina Kashpar 16. Travel 14 Ecuador! Luc Jones 18. Out & About 22. The Way It Is Russia and the WTO, John Harrison Abramovich vs. Berezovsky, Ian Mitchell 22 Skolkova, Miguel Mitchell 30. The Way it Was Red Wedding part I, Helen Womack 32. Wining & Dining SOUP, John Harrison Seasonal Sips for a Supper Soiree or Shindig, Charles 34 Borden 38. Real Estate Year-end Review and Forecast, Vladimir Kozlov Real Estate News, Vladimir Kozlov 41. Family Pages Puzzle Page 38 Fables for Children 44. Profile Alan Moore, Miguel Francis 45. Book Review Piracy: Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg 44 to Gates, review by Ian Mitchell January 2012 3 Letter from the Publisher “You can fool all the people civility of the crowd, which was of us who lived here in the 1990s some of the time, you can even not demanding a revolution but know that in Russia anything is pos- fool some of the people all of the an end to attempts to fool them sible. The prospect of something time, but you cannot fool all of the at election time, was perhaps the unusual happening is not very people all the time,” said Abraham most amazing thing.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Enemy Within'
    The ‘Enemy Within’ Left-wing Soviet Displaced Persons in Australia Ebony Nilsson A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney 2020 Statement of Originality This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Ebony Nilsson 27 November 2020 Author Attribution Statement This thesis contains material published in Ebony Nilsson, “On the Left: The Russian Social Club in Early Cold War Sydney,” Australian Historical Studies 50, 1 (2019): 63-80. The research for this article was undertaken as part of the research for this thesis. I am the sole author of the article. Ebony Nilsson 27 November 2020 As supervisor for the candidature upon which this thesis is based, I can confirm that the authorship attribution statements above are correct. Sheila Fitzpatrick 27 November 2020 Abstract In the wake of the Second World War, Soviet displaced persons (DPs) from Europe and Russians displaced from China were resettled across Western nations. Their migration coincided with the escalating geopolitical tensions of the early Cold War, which in an Australian context turned migrants of Soviet origin into potential ‘enemy aliens.’ Soviet DPs have generally been considered virulently anti-communist, as indeed many were.
    [Show full text]
  • Cercle Pinay and Its Complex of Groups
    ROGUE AGENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Habsburg, Pinay and the Private Cold War 1951 - 1991 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- by David Teacher 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Third edition, October 2011 © 1993, 2008 and 2011. All rights strictly reserved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The author does not necessarily endorse or espouse the contents or opinions of any website which may host this article or any interpretation of this research which may be produced by third parties. He may be contacted at [email protected]. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTENTS (text-only version without documentary or picture annexes) Introduction (1993) … pg 3 Preface (2008) … pg 6 Foreword (2011) … pg 7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ROGUE AGENTS … … pg 8 Footnotes … … pg 179 Sources Annex … … pg 239 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Documentary Annex … … omitted Rogues' Gallery … … omitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NSIC Annex
    [Show full text]
  • Inconvenient History | a Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry
    Inconvenient History | A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/print/printer.php John Demjanjuk: The Man More Sinned Against I am a man more sinned against than sinning!" (King Lear in Shakespeare's King Lear) Nigel Jackson John Demjanjuk is dead. The Age , Melbourne’s more intellectual daily newspaper, reported this on 19th March under the prejudicial and ambiguous heading ‘Nazi camp guard dead.’ Quoting the Washington Post , the newspaper referred to Demjanjuk as ‘the target of a decades-long international effort to prove that he participated in genocide as a guard at Nazi prison camps’. The report summarised the legal history of cases against him and noted that he was finally charged in Germany ‘with 27, 900 counts of being an accessory to murder as a prison guard at Sobibor’, one of the alleged Nazi ‘death camps’. In May 2011 Demjanjuk was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison. There is no suggestion in this report by The Age that anything was amiss in the treatment of this man by the USA, Israel or Germany, although it is noted that he maintained ‘that war-crime accusations against him were a matter of mistaken identity.’ The purpose of this essay in memorial to Demjanjuk is to suggest that there was indeed much amiss in the treatment meted out to him - as indeed there has been in the reporting of his cases and life history by Melbourne newspapers - and to indicate the significance of the whole story to world politics and to the Australian political order.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaos and Confusion: British Oversight of Russian Repatriations in Postwar Southern Austria
    Chaos and Confusion: British Oversight of Russian Repatriations in Postwar Southern Austria by Matthew Miskulin B.A., University of Victoria, 2012 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History Matthew Miskulin, 2017 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Chaos and Confusion: British Oversight of Russian Repatriations in Postwar Southern Austria by Matthew Miskulin B.A., University of Victoria, 2012 Supervisory Committee Dr. Serhy Yekelchyk, (Department of History) Supervisor Dr. Tom Saunders, (Department of History) Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Serhy Yekelchyk, (Department of History) Supervisor Dr. Tom Saunders, (Department of History) Departmental Member In 1945, as the Second World War ended, British troops serving under 5 Corps in southern Austria encountered a number of critical problems which hindered their ability to occupy the region and enact the policy of repatriation as set out in the Yalta Agreement. Fragile lines of supply and communication, and the need to feed and house diverse groups of hundreds of thousands of prisoners of war and refugees impeded British attempts to administer the area. Further complicating the situation was the infiltration of Yugoslav Partisans, supposed allies, fighting under Josip Broz Tito who claimed northern Italy and southern Austria as part of a “Greater Yugoslavia.” In preparation of an anticipated forceful ejection of these Partisans, the British military prioritized the fighting effectiveness of its troops over a consistent application of repatriation.
    [Show full text]