DOCSLIB.ORG

Surveilling the Digital Abortion Diary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Baltimore Law Review Volume 50 Issue 1 Article 2 10-1-2020 Surveilling the Digital Abortion Diary Cynthia Conti-Cook Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Conti-Cook, Cynthia (2020) "Surveilling the Digital Abortion Diary," University of Baltimore Law Review: Vol. 50 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol50/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Review by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEILLING THE DIGITAL ABORTION DIARY Cynthia Conti-Cook* INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 3 I. HISTORY OF CRIMINALIZATION OF PREGNANT PEOPLE AND PROVIDERS ................................................ 15 II. CURRENT LANDSCAPE .......................................................... 17 A. Increased Restrictions of Access ....................................... 17 B. Rise of Self-Induced Abortions ......................................... 21 III. THE TECH-ASSISTED FUTURE CRIMINALIZATION OF PREGNANT PEOPLE AND ABORTION PROVIDERS ........................................................................... 22 A. Tech-Assisted Future Criminalization of People ............... 22 1. Most Americans seek medical advice online at increasing rates ............................................................ 22 2. Pregnant people are also seeking medical advice online at increasing rates ............................................. 24 3. Searches of digital devices by state agencies is an increasingly common form of surveillance, especially of Black individuals and other people of color dependent on state resources .............................. 29 4. Legal status of evidence from digital devices .............. 38 i. Post-Carpenter applications to other digital data ........................................................................ 40 ii. Scope of search warrants for digital data .............. 46 iii. Scope of consent to searches of digital data .......... 47 5. Digital data has already been used against women as evidence of self-induced abortions .......................... 48 6. Other types of digital data that could potentially be used to criminalize pregnant people ............................ 51 7. Digital data presents the potential for prosecutors and police to circumvent medical staff to surveil pregnant people ........................................................... 56 B. Tech-Assisted Future Criminalization of Abortion Providers ........................................................................... 58 1. Providers being investigated and prosecuted ............... 58 1 2 UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 50 2. Additional digital forensics techniques that could target providers ............................................................ 62 IV. “POWER, NOT PARANOIA” .................................................. 66 A. Organizing & Corporate Accountability ........................... 66 B. Legal .................................................................................. 70 C. Policy ................................................................................. 71 CONCLUSION. ................................................................................ 74 2020] Surveilling the Digital Abortion Diary 3 INTRODUCTION1 In 2017, along with her stillborn fetus, Latice Fisher, a Black woman, arrived at the Oktibbeha County General Hospital in Starkville, Mississippi2 in an ambulance.3 While receiving care froM * Cynthia Conti-Cook is a civil rights attorney and researcher based in New York City studying how technology impacts various fights for justice. She is currently on sabbatical from The Legal Aid Society’s Special Litigation Unit, working as a Technology Fellow at the Ford Foundation. She is grateful to the Univ. of Baltimore Law Review and the Applied Feminism and Privacy Conference of 2020, Michele Gilman, and Margaret Johnson, for inviting her to publish this Article. She is also appreciative of the patient and diligent student editors working through challenging circumstances. As always, this Article has evolved through dialogue with many of my colleagues, friends, and family. Cynthia extends her appreciation for reviewing drafts, sharing edits, and extensive brainstorming to Tanya Coke, Brook Kelly-Green (who also initially drafted Parts I and Part IIA), Lynn Paltrow, Logan Koepke, Jerome Greco, Rashida Richardson, Sara Ainsworth, Indra Lusero, and Terri Rosenblatt. The views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not reflect and are not attributable in any way to those of the Ford Foundation. 1. In 2005, filmmaker Penny Lane released The Abortion Diaries (2005) to “dispel[] the stigma of abortion” by inviting 12 women to speak candidly about their abortion experiences. Penny Lane, The Abortion Diaries (2005), PENNY LANE, http://pennyla neismyrealname.com/film/the-abortion-diaries-2005/ [https://perma.cc/FXH3-4U3S] (last visited Nov. 3, 2020). In 2013, storyteller Melissa Madera founded The Abortion Diary podcast to “speak out against the shame, stigma, secrecy, and isolation surrounding abortion by generating, sharing, and receiving personal stories.” Mission: The Abortion Diary, ABORTION DIARY, https://www.theabortiondiary .com/mission [https://perma.cc/7DFX-RCMH] (last visited Nov. 3, 2020). Both pieces begin with the same fundamental observation: because abortion is often stigmatized, people who have experienced it tend to prefer it remain private and, if choosing to share that experience, must feel safe and supported in doing so. See id. 2. Nine history scholars from Mississippi University’s Department of History created “A Shaky Truce” a website that “highlights the civil rights struggles that took place in Starkville, Mississippi during the 1960s and 70s, a time when local African Americans demanded equality for all citizens.” The Project, STARKVILLE C.R., https://starkvillecivilrights.msstate.edu/wordpress/the-project/ [https://perma.cc/PX3Y -3K7N] (last visited Nov. 3, 2020). It describes Oktibbeha County as having “a majority African American population in 1840 and continued to have one until 1950.” The Place, STARKSVILLE C.R., https://starkvillecivilrights.msstate.edu/wordpress/the- place/ [https://perma.cc/ZM7D-GW4C] (last visited Nov. 3, 2020). The county’s Black population decreased to 34.6% in 2013 and its residents remain racially segregated. See id. 3. Ryan Phillips, Infant Death Case Heading Back to Grand Jury, STARKVILLE DAILY NEWS (May 8, 2019), https://www.starkvilledailynews.com/infant-death-case-heading -back-to-grand-jury/article_cf99bcb0-71cc-11e9-963a-eb5dc5052c92.html [https://per ma.cc/9H7B-CA8X] (“Fisher then walked out to the ambulance, was placed on a stretcher, and transported to OCH Regional Medical Center in Starkville where she was evaluated and questioned by hospital staff. Prosecutors allege that Fisher 4 UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 50 medical staff, she was also immediately treated with suspicion of committing a crime.4 Her statements to nurses, the medical records, and the autopsy records of her fetus were turned over to the local police to investigate whether she intentionally killed her fetus.5 To develop these records into evidence supporting an indictment for intentional murder, prosecutors would need some evidence about Ms. Fisher’s intent.6 This is typical; at best, prosecutions of people based on their pregnancy outcomes usually rely on circumstantial medical evidence, what patients report to nurses and doctors, and cooperation from medical staff.7 Without a confession, a diary, or something similar, direct evidence of a person’s Mindset or intentions prior to a termination is usually absent.8 The lack of “intent” evidence might not discourage a prosecutor from attempting to indict someone, but it might dissuade a grand jury from voting for an indictment.9 In Ms. Fisher’s case, the prosecutor sought to fill that gap in the initial presentation to the Grand Jury by arguing that Ms. Fisher’s web search history proved her criminal intent; it included searches for how to induce a miscarriage and evidence that she purchased misoprostol online.10 The first Grand Jury was convinced and indicted Ms. Fisher for second degree murder.11 admitted to a nurse that she learned she was pregnant during an annual gynecological exam a month earlier, but she failed to make any follow-up appointments for an ultrasound or other prenatal care. Fisher was interviewed by investigators about how the events occurred and court documents say she admitted that she didn’t want any more children, that she couldn’t afford any more and that she ‘simply couldn’t deal with being pregnant again.’ Investigators also learned that on April 17, 2017, which was far into Fisher’s third trimester, she researched medication abortion. This information came after investigators downloaded Latice Fisher’s cell phone memory and data, which revealed her internet search history. She also admitted to conducting internet searches, including how to induce a miscarriage, ‘buy abortion pills, mifeprisone online, misoprostol online,’ and ‘buy Misoprostol abortion pill online.’ Fisher then purchased misoprostol following the online
Recommended publications
  • The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes

    The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes

    THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
  • 1 Introduction

    1 Introduction

    1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 ABORTION WORLDWIDE Abortions have been available in all cultures since ancient times (1, 2). Nowadays, an estimated 43.8 million abortions are carried out worldwide each year. About one in five pregnancies ends in an abortion (3). Each year, approximately 21.6 million women worldwide still undergo an unsafe abortion, resulting in an estimated 47000 deaths, largely among the most vulnerable women, such as poor, unmarried and young women in particular. Apart from the deaths caused by unsafe abortions, another 5 million women per year have to deal with temporary or permanent disabilities and are accompanied by huge financial and social costs to themselves, their families and the health care systems (4, 5). Goal 5 of the Millennium Development Goals is to reduce the maternal mortality ratio in 25 years by 75% and to achieve universal access to reproductive health care by 2015 (6). Unsafe abortion is one of the main causes of maternal mortality and could be prevented. Complications from unsafe abortion accounted for an estimated 13% of all maternal deaths worldwide (7). The definition of unsafe abortion by the World Health Organization (WHO) is: a procedure for terminating a pregnancy that is performed by an individual lacking the necessary skills, or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards, or both. Recently, the WHO added the following: “The persons, skills, and medical standards considered safe in the provision of abortion are different for medical and surgical abortion, and also depend on the duration of pregnancy. What is considered “safe” should be interpreted in line with the current WHO technical and policy guidance” (8).
  • Health Journalism 2018

    Health Journalism 2018

    May 2018 CrainsNewsPro.com Checking Into Medical Centers How to Tap Into Hospital Expertise Page 8 The Best in Health Coverage AHCJ Honors Top Reporting of 2017 Page 19 How ABC News Trains Doctors Program Offers Doctors a TV Residency Page 24 An Education In Medicine The World’s Longest Covering Medical Internship Page 34 Health Policy Reporters Push for Better Access — and It’s Paying Off Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL JOURNALISM 2018 SOCIETY OF ENVIRONMENTAL JOURNALISTS 28TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE FRESH , FRESH Hosted by University of Michigan-Flint Oct. 3-7, 2018 18np0026.pdf RunDate:5/7/18 Full Page Color: 4/C FROM THE EDITOR CrainsNewsPro.com Prescription for Trust Being a health journalist isn’t easy even in the best of times. Reporters covering medical issues bear a responsibility to their audience that requires them to be true to the facts, remaining impartial and, at the same time, being discerning, as “facts” can change CONTENTS depending on what study is coming out or who’s talking about the issues. COVERING PUBLIC POLICY ................. 4 But this year got o to a shaky start on the federal level. Reporters were being singled After a Rough Start, Journalists Are out for exclusive access to federal press briengs while others fought to nd out what was Making Inroads in Washington happening. One reporter was cut o during a press conference call. Even nding people ALTERNATE SOURCES .......................... 6 to interview about complicated regulatory issues was a monumental task. Some Organizations Provide Options for anks to the eorts of the medical press, things are slowly changing for the better.
  • The Impact of Northern Ireland's Abortion Laws on Women's Abortion Decision-Making and Experiences

    The Impact of Northern Ireland's Abortion Laws on Women's Abortion Decision-Making and Experiences

    Downloaded from http://srh.bmj.com on January 16, 2019 - Published by group.bmj.com Research The impact of Northern Ireland’s abortion laws on women’s abortion decision-making and experiences Abigail R A Aiken,1,2 Elisa Padron,3 Kathleen Broussard,2,4 Dana Johnson1 1LBJ School of Public Affairs, ABSTRACT University of Texas at Austin, Key messages Background In Northern Ireland, abortion is Austin, Texas, USA 2 Population Research Center, illegal except in very limited circumstances to ► Women in Northern Ireland still University of Texas at Austin, preserve a woman’s life or to prevent permanent experience multiple barriers to travelling Austin, Texas, USA or long-term injury to her physical or mental 3College of Natural Sciences, to access abortion care even though University of Texas at Austin, health. Abortions conducted outside the law are abortions are now provided free in Great Austin, Texas, USA a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment. Britain. 4Department of Sociology, We assessed the impacts of Northern Ireland’s ► Self-managed medication abortion using University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA abortion laws on women's decision-making and online telemedicine may be preferred experiences in accessing abortion. over travel due its convenience and Correspondence to Methods Between April 2017 and February safety, but the experience is dominated Dr Abigail R A Aiken, LBJ School 2018 we interviewed 30 women living in by fear and isolation due to the risk of of Public Affairs, University Northern Ireland who had sought abortion prosecution. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78713, USA; araa2@ utexas.
  • B1 Self Managed Abortion

    B1 Self Managed Abortion

    B1- Ensuring Support for and Access to Self-Managed Abortion 1 I. Title: Ensuring Support for and Access to Self-Managed Abortion 2 3 II. Author Identification 4 • Monique Baumont, Center for Reproductive Rights, 199 Water St, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 5 10038, [email protected], Member #10432693, Sexual and Reproductive Health 6 Section 7 • Bonnie K Epstein, unaffiliated, 4403 Riverview Ave, Englewood, NJ 07631, 8 [email protected]. Member #9855820, Sexual and Reproductive Health Section. 9 • Caitlin Phelps, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 409 12th Street, SW 10 Washington, DC 20024-2188, [email protected], Member #9847505, Sexual and Reproductive 11 Health Section 12 • Silpa Srinivasulu, Reproductive Health Access Project, P.O. Box 21191, New York, NY 10025, 13 [email protected], Member #10338166, Sexual and Reproductive Health Section 14 15 III. Co-Sponsorship: Sexual and Reproductive Health Section 16 17 IV. Collaborating Units: N/A 18 19 V. Endorsement: International Health Section 20 21 VI. Summary 22 Access to abortion care is essential to the health, well-being, and bodily autonomy of pregnant 23 people and their families. While the right to abortion is constitutionally protected in the U.S., restrictive 24 state and federal legislation and regulations have eroded this right. These policies have exacerbated 25 structural inequities to undermine and impede access to care, disproportionately affecting Black, 26 Indigenous, and people of color, those with lower incomes, immigrants, and people in rural areas. Due to 27 logistical and financial barriers to accessing abortion care, and some people’s personal preferences and 28 experiences of stigma and structural racism with respect to the medical system, there has been 29 considerable growth in demand for self-managed abortion in the U.S.
  • What Is Reproductive Justice?

    What Is Reproductive Justice?

    o o o o o .
  • Ireland, Abortion Access and the Movement to Remove the Eighth Amendment

    Ireland, Abortion Access and the Movement to Remove the Eighth Amendment

    “#Repealthe8th”: Ireland, Abortion Access and the Movement to Remove the Eighth Amendment SINÉAD KENNEDY*1 Abstract Abortion is illegal in almost all circumstances in Ireland, permitted only where there is a risk to the life of the woman due to the eighth amend- ment to the Irish Constitution. While abortion is banned, women living in Ireland do access abortion; they do so legally by travelling abroad, and illegally within Ireland by accessing the abortion pill online. This access is highly mediated by race, class and migration status. This article will consider the politics of Ireland’s abortion ban through the prism of public debates around abortion, reflecting on the discursive devices employed to both chal- lenge and uphold the status quo on abortion. This conclusion will focus on different dimensions of the “Repeal” movement; a movement that pro- pelled Ireland to finally face up to the reality of abortion and change it laws through removing the eighth amendment from the constitution. Keywords: Abortion; Migration; Repeal; Movement; Ireland On Friday 25th May 2018 the Irish electorate voted by two to one majority to remove Article 40.3.3, the prohibition on abortion, from the Irish Con- stitution. While opinion polls had suggested that those who campaigned to remove the ban on abortion would win, it was predicted to be a close result; no one predicted the sheer scale of the victory and the support from every section of society, young and old, urban and rural. In the immediate aftermath of the referendum the result was heralded as nothing short of revolutionary by journalists and activists alike who understood it to be part of a major gender and generational shift in Irish political life.
  • Abortion Law and Policy Around the World: in Search of Decriminalization Marge Berer

    Abortion Law and Policy Around the World: in Search of Decriminalization Marge Berer

    HHr Health and Human Rights Journal HHR_final_logo_alone.indd 1 10/19/15 10:53 AM Abortion Law and Policy Around the World: In Search of Decriminalization marge berer Abstract The aim of this paper is to provide a panoramic view of laws and policies on abortion around the world, giving a range of country-based examples. It shows that the plethora of convoluted laws and restrictions surrounding abortion do not make any legal or public health sense. What makes abortion safe is simple and irrefutable—when it is available on the woman’s request and is universally affordable and accessible. From this perspective, few existing laws are fit for purpose. However, the road to law reform is long and difficult. In order to achieve the right to safe abortion, advocates will need to study the political, health system, legal, juridical, and socio-cultural realities surrounding existing law and policy in their countries, and decide what kind of law they want (if any). The biggest challenge is to determine what is possible to achieve, build a critical mass of support, and work together with legal experts, parliamentarians, health professionals, and women themselves to change the law—so that everyone with an unwanted pregnancy who seeks an abortion can have it, as early as possible and as late as necessary. Marge Berer is international coordinator of the International Campaign for Women’s Right to Safe Abortion, London, UK, and was the editor of Reproductive Health Matters, which she founded, from 1993 to 2015. Please address correspondence to Marge Berer. Email: [email protected].
  • Eliminating the Initial In-Person Medical Abortion Visit☆ ⁎ Elizabeth G

    Eliminating the Initial In-Person Medical Abortion Visit☆ ⁎ Elizabeth G

    Contraception 92 (2015) 190–193 Commentary Reaching women where they are: eliminating the initial in-person medical abortion visit☆ ⁎ Elizabeth G. Raymonda, , Daniel Grossmanb,c, Ellen Wiebed, Beverly Winikoffa aGynuity Health Projects, 15 E 26th Street, Suite 801, New York, NY, 10010, USA bIbis Reproductive Health, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA cDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA dDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia and Medical Director, Willow Women's Clinic, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Received 28 May 2015; revised 22 June 2015; accepted 23 June 2015 Abstract The requirement that every woman desiring medical abortion must come in person to a clinical facility to obtain the drugs is a substantial barrier for many women. To eliminate this requirement in the United States, two key components of the standard initial visit would need to be restructured. First, alternatives to ultrasound and pelvic exam would need to be identified for ensuring that gestational age is within the limit for safe and effective treatment. This is probably feasible: for example, data from a large study suggest that in selected patients menstrual history is highly sensitive for this purpose. Second, the Food and Drug Administration would need to remove the medically unwarranted restriction on distribution of mifepristone. These two changes could allow provision of the service by a broader range of providers in nontraditional venues or even by telemedicine. Such options could have profound benefits in reducing cost and expanding access to abortion. © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Abortion, Privacy, and Values in Conflict

    Abortion, Privacy, and Values in Conflict

    Chapter 20: Abortion, Privacy, and Values in Conflict annenbergclassroom.org/resource/the-pursuit-of-justice/pursuit-justice-chapter-20-abortion-privacy-values- conflict May 4, 2017 Roe v. Wade (1973) Abortion has roiled the waters of modern American life as few other issues have. Beneath this debate are simmering differences over basic values: the rights of the unborn and the related matter of when life begins, the rights of women to control their reproductive functions and preserve their health, the expectation that women’s most important role is to bear children, and the role of the state in selecting among these values. The resulting conflicts have haunted American history, and today they are an exceptionally tense social and political issue. In colonial times and in the nation’s early years, abortion was unregulated, in large measure because giving birth was at least as, if not more, dangerous than having an abortion. Under such circumstances state lawmakers concluded that it made little sense to declare abortion a crime. That position was reinforced by the English common law, which allowed abortions until the point of “quickening,” the first time a pregnant woman felt the movement of an unborn fetus, usually in the fourth or fifth month of a pregnancy. By 1860 this lack of attention began to change, and lawmakers in twenty of the thirty-three states in the Union had criminalized abortion. These new laws, collectively known as the Comstock laws, and named after Anthony Comstock, a politician and postal inspector, did not punish women seeking abortions, but instead levied fines and jail terms against doctors and others who performed the procedure.
  • A Dissertation Entitled Exploring the Relationship Between

    A Dissertation Entitled Exploring the Relationship Between

    A Dissertation entitled Exploring the Relationship Between Independently Licensed Counselor Identity Factors and Human Sexuality Competencies by Meagan McBride Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Counselor Education ________________________________________ Christopher P. Roseman, Ph.D., Committee Chair ________________________________________ Madeline E. Clark, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________ John M. Laux, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________ Jennifer L. Reynolds, Ph.D., Committee Member ________________________________________ Amanda Bryant-Friedrich, PhD, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo July, 2018 Copyright 2018, Meagan McBride This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of Exploring the Relationship Between Independently Licensed Counselor Identity Factors and Human Sexuality Competencies by Meagan McBride Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Counselor Education The University of Toledo July, 2018 Human sexuality is a profound and multifaceted psychosocial component of the human condition that is universally experience. As such, it is an inevitability that issues related to sexuality will come up in counseling; however, there is a lack of scientific-based sex education in K-12 schools. Additionally, there is no requirement, except for in two states, for students in mental health counseling programs to complete a course on human sexuality. This quantitative study aimed to explore current practicing counselors’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, and comfort in addressing sexuality concerns with clients. Participants were gathered from current list serves serving counselors nationwide via online survey requests.
  • Legal Appendix to “Momma's Got the Pill” Coding of Comstock Statutes

    Legal Appendix to “Momma's Got the Pill” Coding of Comstock Statutes

    Legal Appendix to “Momma’s Got the Pill” Martha J. Bailey and Allison Davido Coding of Comstock Statutes and the Regulation of Birth Control, 1873 to 1973 This appendix summarizes information about the evolution of anti-obscenity statutes in the 48 coterminous United States and their relevance for the use of contraception from 1958 to 1965.1 It also summarizes the information in secondary sources, our coding scheme and how coding decisions are reached in each case. For each state, we note the relevant text of the statute, the agreement (or disagreement) of our interpretation with Dennett (1926), Smith (1964), Dienes (1972), and a 1974 report by the Department of Health and Economic Welfare (DHEW). We also incorporate relevant judicial decisions, attorney general decisions, and information from Planned Parenthood Affiliate Histories (Guttmacher 1979) when this information informs an understanding of the relevant statutory climate. Brief Overview of Anti-Obscenity Statutes in the United States before Griswold v. Connecticut In 1873, the U.S. Congress codified a prohibition on the sales of contraception with the passage of the Comstock Act. Named for their zealous congressional advocate, Anthony Comstock, this law outlawed the interstate mailing, shipping or importing of articles, drugs, medicines and printed materials of “obscenities”, which applied to anything used “for the prevention of conception.”2 Despite the narrow purview of this federal Act, it also aimed to “incite every State Legislature to enact similar laws” (Dienes 1972: 43, quoting Representative Merrimam, New York Times, Mar. 15, 1873, p. 3, col. 3). While this Act failed to curtail the trade in obscenities directly, it did succeed in this secondary purpose.