Joint Committee on Finance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joint Committee on Finance Joint Committee on Finance Informational Paper 76 Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau January, 2017 Joint Committee on Finance Prepared by Jere M. Bauer, Jr. Wisconsin Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 Madison, WI 53703 http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Review of the Governor's Recommended Budget ........................................................................................ 1 Review of Other Fiscal Bills ......................................................................................................................... 2 Emergency Clause Requirement ................................................................................................................... 2 Supplementation of Agency Appropriations ................................................................................................. 3 Changes in Authorized Position Levels ........................................................................................................ 3 Other Responsibilities ................................................................................................................................... 4 Appendix I A History of the Joint Committee on Finance ............................................................... 6 Appendix II Reviews by the Joint Committee on Finance ............................................................... 23 Appendix III Appropriation and Position Adjustments by the Joint Committee on Finance .............................................................................................. 24 Appendix IV Bill Introductions by the Joint Committee on Finance ................................................ 26 Appendix V Approvals by the Joint Committee on Finance ............................................................ 27 Appendix VI Statutorily-Required Reports to the Joint Committee on Finance ............................... 38 Appendix VII Statutorily-Required Appearance Before the Joint Committee on Finance ................. 50 Appendix VIII Joint Committee on Finance Co-chairs Ex Officio Memberships ............................... 51 Appendix IX Co-chairs of the Joint Committee on Finance .............................................................. 52 Appendix X Joint Committee on Finance Members and Sessions Served, 1911-2017.................... 54 Appendix XI Joint Committee on Finance Members by Legislative Session, 1911-2017 ................ 61 Appendix XII Joint Committee on Finance Members by Municipality, 1911-2017 .......................... 73 Joint Committee on Finance Introduction Legislative Fiscal Bureau's informational paper entitled, "State Budget Process."] Following that The Joint Committee on Finance is a statuto- section, succeeding sections describe the Com- ry, standing committee of the Wisconsin Legisla- mittee's duties for: (a) review of other fiscal bills; ture. A Joint Committee on Finance has been (b) supplementation of agency appropriations; specified in the statutes since 1911 when the Leg- and (c) approval of changes in authorized posi- islature enacted Chapter 6, Laws of 1911, first tion levels. creating the Committee. Appendix I provides a detailed history of the Members of the Committee are appointed by Joint Committee on Finance. This history is each house in the same manner as are members based on material that was originally prepared by of other standing committees [by the Speaker in Tony Mason, a member of the staff of the Legis- the Assembly and by the Senate Majority Leader lative Fiscal Bureau, and first distributed publicly in the Senate]. The Committee is staffed on a at a ceremony held October 24, 2001, to dedicate full-time basis by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, a the Committee's new hearing room (Room 412 statutory legislative service agency whose Direc- East of the State Capitol). Following that history, tor is appointed by the Joint Committee on Legis- there are six additional appendices which provide lative Organization. As Committee staff, the Bu- detailed listings of the Committee's various statu- reau's analysts provide a wide variety of infor- tory responsibilities in the areas of: (a) required mation and analyses to Committee members re- reviews; (b) appropriation and position adjust- garding each biennial budget as well as on state ments; (c) specific bill introductions; (d) required programs and fiscal policy. In addition, staff pro- approvals of agency actions; (e) agency reports vide summary information on all bills considered required to be submitted to the Committee; and by the Committee and prepare analyses of agency (f) required appearances before the Committee. requests for appropriation supplements and The eighth appendix lists the other legislative changes in authorized position levels requested committees and statutory bodies on which the outside of the budget process. Co-chairs of the Committee are ex officio mem- bers. The ninth appendix lists the Co-chairs of the The Joint Committee on Finance's original Committee since 1911. The final appendices (X and still primary responsibility is to serve as the through XII) list all legislators who served as principal legislative committee charged with the members of the Joint Committee on Finance review of all state appropriations and revenues. since 1911. These appendices list members: (a) This responsibility is most prominently carried alphabetically (Appendix X); (b) by legislative out by the Committee's detailed review of the bi- session (Appendix XI); and (c) by municipality ennial budget recommendations of the Governor. (Appendix XII). In addition, the Committee has been given a number of other fiscal and budgetary oversight Review of the Governor's Recommended responsibilities. The next section of this paper Budget briefly summarizes the Committee's procedures in reviewing the Governor's proposed budget. [A The statutes provide that immediately after more detailed summary is also available in the delivery of the Governor's budget message, the 1 executive budget bill(s) must be introduced, clude the review of all other (non-budget) reve- without change, into one of the two houses of the nue or spending bills. This responsibility ema- Legislature by the Joint Committee on Finance. nates from a statutory requirement [s. 13.093(1)] Further, upon introduction the bill or bills must which specifies that, "All bills introduced in ei- be referred to the Committee for review. ther house of the legislature for the appropriation of money, providing for revenue or relating to Upon completing its summary of the budget, taxation shall be referred to the joint committee the Legislative Fiscal Bureau may provide initial on finance before being passed." overview briefings on the budget for the full Committee (and any other legislators who wish to Although Committee sessions are not held on attend). In addition, state agency officials may all bills that are referred to it, most bills that have provide testimony on the budget to the Commit- a significant fiscal effect or otherwise involve tee. Following completion of any such briefings, major policy are reviewed by the Committee. the Committee begins to hold public hearings on Some of these bills may not actually appropriate the Governor's proposed budget. The hearings are any additional funds but the accompanying fiscal usually held in a number of locations throughout estimate (prepared by the affected state agency) the state. may project that if the bill is enacted, it will result in significant increased costs to the agency. Fur- Upon conclusion of the public hearings, the ther, for some bills, the Committee's Co-chairs Finance Committee commences executive ses- may decide to hold a public hearing on a bill sions on the Governor's recommended budget. even though another committee may have already These executive sessions represent the decision- done so. In addition, some major fiscal bills may making phase of the Committee's responsibilities. be referred by the presiding officer of the As- In Wisconsin, executive session meetings on the sembly or Senate directly to the Finance Commit- budget are open to the public; however, testimo- tee. (Under the rules of the Assembly, commit- ny or commentary from the public or agency of- tees are not required to hold a public hearing on a ficials is not taken and discussion is between bill prior to action; under Senate rules, no bill Committee members, Legislative Fiscal Bureau may be placed on the calendar that has not had a staff, and the Department of Administration's public hearing, but the Senate Committee on Or- State Budget Office staff. ganization may waive this requirement.) The Joint Committee on Finance invariably Emergency Clause Requirement adopts a budget which contains numerous chang- es to the budget proposed by the Governor. Once In addition to its general responsibility for re- all proposed changes have been considered, the view of spending and/or revenue bills, the Com- Committee directs the Legislative Fiscal Bureau mittee has a special responsibility at the start of to work with the Legislative Reference Bureau each session in the odd-numbered years regard- and draft (in bill form) the Committee's recom- ing legislation with a fiscal impact. Under s. mended budget. Typically, the form of the Com- 16.47(2), no bill providing an appropriation, de- mittee's recommended budget
Recommended publications
  • Who Are My Wisconsin Legislators?
    Who are my Wisconsin Legislators? To find … • Legislators by entering a street address • Legislators by municipality where you vote • Detailed legislative district maps Click on this link: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/w3asp/waml/waml.aspx • Legislators by Technical College District document follows beginning on the next page … More information: http://www.buildingthenextgeneration.org Further assistance: Paul Gabriel, 608 266-9430 [email protected] 1 2011 - 2013 State Legislators by Technical College District Wisconsin Technical College District Boards Association August, 2011 Members in bold text were first elected this session Numbers at left are Senate and Assembly Districts “Additional” members overlap only slightly into the college district Blackhawk Technical College Senators 15 Tim Cullen, D-Janesville 27 Jon Erpenbach, D-Waunakee Representatives 43 Evan Wynn, R-Whitewater 44 Joe Knilans, R-Janesville 45 Amy Loudenbeck, R-Clinton 80 Janis Ringhand, D-Evansville Chippewa Valley Technical College Senators 10 Sheila Harsdorf, R-River Falls 23 Terry Moulton, R-Chippewa Falls 31 Kathleen Vinehout, D-Alma Representatives 29 John Murtha, R-Baldwin 30 Dean Knudson, R-Hudson 67 Tom Larson, R-Colfax 68 Kathy Bernier, R-Chippewa Falls 69 Scott Suder, R-Abbotsford 91 Chris Danou, D-Trempealeau 93 Warren Petryk, R-Eleva Additional Representatives 92 Mark Radcliffe, D-Black River Falls 2 Fox Valley Technical College Senators 1 Frank Lasee, R-DePere 2 Robert Cowles, R-Green Bay 14 Luther Olsen, R-Ripon 18 Jessica King, D-Oshkosh 19 Michael
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters/Ipsos/UVA Center for Politics State Poll: Wisconsin Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs
    Reuters/Ipsos/UVA Center for Politics State Poll: Wisconsin Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs Reuters/Ipsos/UVA Center for Politics State Poll: Wisconsin Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in conjunction with the University of Virginia Center for Politics 10.24.2018 These are findings from an Ipsos poll conducted October 12-18, 2018 on behalf of Thomson Reuters and the University of Virginia Center for Politics. For the survey, a sample of roughly 2,001 adults age 18+ from Wisconsin were interviewed online in English. The sample includes 1,193 likely voters, 568 likely voter Democrats, 472 likely voter Republicans and 91 likely voter Independents. 1. In your opinion, what is the most important problem facing the US today? (Select from below or write in). All Likely Likely Voters: Likely Voters: Likely Voters: All Adults Voters Democrat Republican Independent Economy generally 11% 10% 9% 10% 8% Unemployment / lack of jobs 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% War / foreign conflicts 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% Immigration 9% 12% 3% 24% 4% Terrorism / terrorist attacks 6% 7% 5% 10% 4% Healthcare 28% 29% 37% 22% 26% Energy issues 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Morality 9% 10% 7% 11% 15% Education 4% 4% 6% 2% 4% Crime 7% 6% 5% 8% 6% Environment 6% 5% 10% 1% 3% Other – 10% 11% 13% 6% 22% Don't know 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2. In November 2018, the next midterm congressional election will be held. Using a 1-to-10 scale, where 10 means you are completely certain you will vote and 1 means you are completely certain you will NOT vote, how likely are you to vote in the upcoming midterm congressional election? (Select one) Likely Voters: Likely Voters: Likely Voters: All Adults All Likely Voters Democrat Republican Independent 1 12% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 5 8% 1% 1% 0% 2% 6 3% 1% 0% 1% 2% 7 4% 2% 1% 2% 3% 8 6% 3% 2% 4% 3% 9 7% 8% 6% 9% 12% 10 54% 83% 87% 82% 75% Reuters/Ipsos/UVA Center for Politics State Poll: Wisconsin Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Joint Committee on Finance Senate Members Assembly Members Sen
    2021 Joint Committee on Finance Senate Members Assembly Members Sen. Howard Marklein, Co-Chair (R-17) Spring Green Rep. Mark Born, Co-Chair (R-39) Beaver Dam [email protected] [email protected] Room 316 East, State Capitol Room 308 East, State Capitol (608) 266-0703 (608) 266-2540 Rep. Sen. Duey Stroebel, (R-20) Saukville Amy Loudenbeck (R-31) Clinton [email protected] [email protected] Room 18 South, State Capitol Room 304 East, State Capitol (608) 266-7513 (608) 266-9967 Sen. Dale Kooyenga (R-5) Brookfield Rep. Terry Katsma (R-26) Oostburg [email protected] [email protected] Room 310 South, State Capitol Room 306 East, State Capitol (608) 266-2512 (608) 266-0656 Sen. Mary Felzkowski (R-12) Irma Rep. Shannon Zimmerman(R-30) River Falls [email protected] [email protected] Room 415 South, State Capitol Room 324 East, State Capitol (608) 266-2509 (608) 266-1526 Sen. Kathleen Bernier (R-23) Chippewa Falls Rep. Jessie Rodriguez (R-21) Oak Creek [email protected] [email protected] Room 319 South, State Capitol Room 321 East, State Capitol (608) 266-7511 (608) 266-0610 Sen. Joan Ballweg (R-14) Markesan Rep. Tony Kurtz (R-50) Wonewoc [email protected] [email protected] Room 409 South, State Capitol Room 320 East, State Capitol (608) 266-0751 (608) 266-8531 Sen. Jon Erpenbach(D-27) West Point Rep. Evan Goyke (D-18) Milwaukee [email protected] [email protected] Room 130 South, State Capitol Room 112 North, State Capitol (608) (608) 266-6670 266-0645 Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2006
    APPENDIX: CANDIDATE PROFILES BY STATE We analyzed the fair trade positions of candidates in each race that the Cook Political Report categorized as in play. In the profiles below, race winners are denoted by a check mark. Winners who are fair traders are highlighted in blue text. Alabama – no competitive races___________________________________________ Alaska_________________________________________________________________ Governor OPEN SEAT – incumbent Frank Murkowski (R) lost in primary and was anti-fair trade. As senator, Murkowski had a 100% anti-fair trade voting record. 9 GOP Sarah Palin’s trade position is unknown. • Democratic challenger Tony Knowles is a fair trader. In 2004, Knowles ran against Lisa Murkowski for Senate and attacked her for voting for NAFTA-style trade deals while in the Senate, and for accepting campaign contributions from companies that off-shore jobs.1 Arizona________________________________________________________________ Senate: Incumbent GOP Sen. Jon Kyl. 9 Kyl is anti-fair trade. Has a 100% anti-fair trade record. • Jim Pederson (D) is a fair trader. Pederson came out attacking Kyl’s bad trade record in closing week of campaign, deciding to make off-shoring the closing issue. On Nov. 3 campaign statement: “Kyl has repeatedly voted for tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas, and he has voted against a measure that prohibited outsourcing of work done under federally funded contracts,” said Pederson spokesman Kevin Griffis, who added that Pederson “wants more protections [in trade pacts] related to child labor rules and environmental safeguards to help protect U.S. jobs.”2 House Arizona 1: GOP Rep. Rick Renzi incumbent 9 Renzi is anti-fair trade. 100% bad trade vote record.
    [Show full text]
  • John Deere Political Action Committee
    JDPAC John Deere Political Action Committee John Deere Political Action Committee Contributions Detail by State 2019-2020 Election Cycle STATE CANDIDATE NAME DISTRICT OFFICE PARTY DISBURSED ALABAMA AL Terri Sewell 07 U.S. House Democratic Party $ 5,000 AL Thomas Tuberville U.S. Senate Republican Party $ 5,000 ALASKA AK Dan Sullivan U.S. Senate Republican Party $ 5,000 ARIZONA AZ Martha McSally U.S. Senate Republican Party $ 10,000 ARKANSAS AR Rick Crawford 01 U.S. House Republican Party $ 5,000 AR Bruce Westerman 04 U.S. House Republican Party $ 10,000 CALIFORNIA CA Amerish Bera 07 U.S. House Democratic Party $ 5,000 CA Jim Costa 16 U.S. House Democratic Party $ 10,000 CA Jimmy Panetta 20 U.S. House Democratic Party $ 10,000 CA David Valadao 21 U.S. House Republican Party $ 10,000 CA Devin Nunes 22 U.S. House Republican Party $ 10,000 CA Kevin McCarthy 23 U.S. House Republican Party $ 10,000 CA Mike Garcia 25 U.S. House Republican Party $ 5,000 CA Young Kim 39 U.S. House Republican Party $ 2,500 COLORADO CO Scott Tipton 03 U.S. House Republican Party $ 5,000 CO Cory Gardner U.S. Senate Republican Party $ 7,000 DELAWARE DE Lisa Blunt Rochester At-Large U.S. House Democratic Party $ 10,000 GEORGIA GA Thomas McCall 33 State House Republican Party $ 2,000 GA Sam Watson 172 State House Republican Party $ 2,000 GA Sanford Bishop 02 U.S. House Democratic Party $ 5,000 GA Drew Ferguson 3 U.S. House Republican Party $ 10,000 GA Karen Handel 6 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing the Guard in Wisconsin a Repeat of the Past Or a New Beginning?
    CHANGING THE GUARD IN WISCONSIN A REPEAT OF THE PAST OR A NEW BEGINNING? JEFF MAYERS hank Tommy paign 2002. Joining Thompson, McCann in making TChuck Chvala pre-election charges and E. Michael was Dane County McCann. If you want- District Attorney ed a clean sweep of Brian Blanchard, who the old leadership in also charged a trio of Madison, you got Assembly Republican your wish. leaders and a top Republican Assembly On January 6, aide. Earlier, he had 2003, a new governor charged state Sen. and a new slate of leg- Brian Burke, D- islative leaders offi- Milwaukee, with a cially took their places host of felonies, forc- at the Capitol — ing Burke to pull out swept up in a wave of of the attorney gener- change swelled by the al's race. And specu- end of the Thompson lation in early 2003 era, the “caucus scan- was that Blanchard's continuing investiga- dal,” and opportunistic electioneering by tion would hit others. Republicans and GOP-leaning interest groups. While there are some holdovers (Assembly It happened because: Majority Leader Steve Foti, R-Oconomowoc, • Tommy Thompson left the governorship held onto office and leadership despite legal after 14 years on February 1, 2001, to take a problems) and the new slate of leaders are not cabinet post with President Bush, leaving exactly fresh faces to Capitol vets, the ascension longtime lieutenant governor Scott of the new political order represents one of the McCallum to cope with a falling budget biggest changes to hit Madison in two decades. and economic trends; Twenty years ago, there was a new governor (Democrat Tony Earl), a new Assembly speaker • Former Senate Majority Leader Chuck (Democrat Tom Loftus), a new Assembly Chvala became enough of a political villain minority leader (Republican Tommy to pull down Democratic incumbents in Thompson), a new Senate majority leader the Senate; (Democratic Tim Cullen), and a new Senate • and, Milwaukee County District Attorney E.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPRC/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel August 2018
    SUPRC/Milwaukee Journal Sentinel August 2018 Region: (N=500) n % Northeast --------------------------------------------------------- 114 22.80 North ----------------------------------------------------------------- 42 8.40 West ------------------------------------------------------------------ 63 12.60 South --------------------------------------------------------------- 104 20.80 Southeast --------------------------------------------------------- 177 35.40 Hello, my name is __________, and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University. I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. Would you be willing to spend seven minutes answering some questions? Thank You. Are you currently registered to vote? {IF YES, PROCEED. IF NO/ UNDECIDED, TERMINATE} 1. Gender (N=500) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 244 48.80 Female ------------------------------------------------------------ 256 51.20 2. How likely are you to vote in the upcoming elections for Governor and U.S. Senate – will you almost certainly vote, will you probably vote, are the chances 50-50, will you probably not vote, or will you definitely not vote in the general? (N=500) n % Almost certain---------------------------------------------------- 477 95.40 Probably vote ------------------------------------------------------ 23 4.60 3. Toward which political party do you lean toward at this time? (N=500) n % Democrat --------------------------------------------------------- 186 37.20 Republican -------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Common Core Standards Are Hard to Top, Despite the Complaints
    Education Reform Still a good conservative idea By Michael J. Petrilli ack in 2010, when Wisconsin chose to adopt the Common Core state standards, it wasn’t a difficult Bdecision. While the Badger State has long led the na- tion on school choice, it has one of the worst records in the country on standards-based reform. Its reading and math standards were among the lowest in the country, and its tests among the easiest to pass — possibly explaining why Common Core Wisconsin’s student performance mostly flat-lined over the 2000s while other states made significant gains. Common Core gave Wisconsin a chance to start fresh, standards are aim higher and catch up to leading states like Massachu- setts. The standards haven’t changed over the past five years, hard to top, but the political calculus certainly has. Opposition to the Common Core has become a cause célèbre of the Tea Party — both its organic grass roots and its more opportunistic despite the fundraising factions. The main concern was the unfortunate role of the federal government in encouraging — some would say coercing — the states to adopt the Common complaints Core via the $4 billion Race to the Top initiative. So it’s not surprising that politicians — especially Re- publican governors — find themselves trying to triangulate between their anti-Common Core base and the business wing of the GOP, which sees these standards as important building blocks for stronger public schools and a more competitive economy. Enter Gov. (and presumptive presidential candidate) Scott Walker. Walker has a history of successful triangula- tion, particularly around Obamacare.
    [Show full text]
  • January 14, 2021 the Honorable Tony Evers, Governor State Of
    January 14, 2021 The Honorable Tony Evers, Governor State of Wisconsin State Capitol Madison, WI Re: 2021-23 State Capital Budget, UW-Eau Claire Science and Health Sciences Building Dear Governor Evers: On behalf of the Chippewa Valley area business community, we’re writing to ask you to include the second phase of funding for the UW-Eau Claire Science & Health Sciences Building in your 2021-23 State Capital Budget. Replacing Phillips Hall has been and remains the Chamber’s highest priority for the past two budget cycles. We are fortunate our area bipartisan legislative delegation agrees. We appreciated your leadership in 2019 in proposing and securing the funding for phase one. As you said here in Eau Claire on the day you announced it, “The state’s investment will leverage taxpayer dollars to support the Chippewa Valley’s emergence as a healthcare innovation hub, while also investing in a visionary campus that is tackling some of the most pressing healthcare and technology issues facing rural Wisconsinites.” Indeed, there is no other current project that is more important to the future of our regional economy and workforce than this urgently needed replacement for the aging and outdated Phillips Hall. In our lobbying effort two years ago, we told lawmakers that this project would be a model for how to build major projects across the system, which is one of the primary reasons it received so much support. Including the second phase of funding in this current budget cycle is essential to successfully achieving the goal for UWEC to design a unified, efficient building, thereby allowing for a shortened construction timeline, cost savings for taxpayers, and timely completion to successfully realize all of its potential benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Finance Report State of Wisconsin
    CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT STATE OF WISCONSIN Is this report an Amendment? No COMMITTEE IDENTIFICATION Name of Committee Friends of Patrick Miles Address 5410 North Pass OFFICE USE ONLY City, State, ZIP McFarland, WI 53558 GAB # ID NAME OF REPORT Jan 20__ Continuing Pre-Primary 20__ Spring Fall Special July 20__ Continuing Pre-election 2010 Spring Fall Special SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Column A Column B Audited Totals 1. RECEIPTS This Period YTD Office Use Only A. Contributions including Loans from Individuals $ 5,444.88 $ 5,444.88 B. Contributions from Committees (Transfers-In) $ 700.00 $ 700.00 C. Other Income and Commercial Loans $ 2.00 $ 2.00 TOTAL RECEIPTS (Add totals from 1A, 1B, and 1C) $ 6,146.88 $ 6,146.88 1. DISBURSEMENTS A. Gross Expenditures $ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 B. Contributions to Committees (Transfers-Out) $ - $ - TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS (Add totals from 2A and 2B) $ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 CASH SUMMARY Cash Balance at Beginning of Report$ 2,564.47 $ 2,564.47 Total Receipts$ 6,146.88 $ 6,146.88 Subtotal$ 8,711.35 $ 8,711.35 Total Disbursements$ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 CASH BALANCE AT END OF REPORT $ 5,214.62 $ 5,214.62 INCURRED OBLIGATIONS (at close of period) $ 755.61 LOANS (at close of period) $ - I certify that I have examined this report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete. Type or Print Name of Candidate or Treasurer Signature of Candidate or Treasurer Date Daytime Phone NOTE: The information on this form is required by ss.
    [Show full text]
  • Swing State Wisconsin Stays in Play Through ‘08
    SWING STATE WISCONSIN STAYS IN PLAY THROUGH ‘08 JEFF MAYERS isconsin economic impact of voters went campaign advertis- W to the polls ing, direct mailing, on November 2 to nar- and polling that rowly favor Democrat totaled tens of mil- John Kerry; over- lions of hard-to-track whelmingly elect a dollars. Democrat with a mav- And there’s no erick reputation, Russ reason to believe Feingold, to another that things will be term in the U.S. Senate any different four in what was seen as a years from now. national Republican Wisconsin, which year; send an evenly elected a Democratic partisan split congres- presidential candi- sional delegation back date at the top of the to the U.S. House; and ticket by the narrow- boost GOP majorities est of margins for the in the state Senate and second straight elec- Assembly by one each to 19-14 and 60-39, tion, will likely be on the battleground map of respectively. any D.C. strategist. Wisconsin voters are—take your pick— In the meantime, statewide races will inter- either incredibly independent, schizophrenic, vene between now and the presidential contest or deviously wedded to the system of political of ’08—races that could determine whether checks and balances. the state goes blue or red in ’08. It’s that kind of unpredictability that made The final election ’04 presidential turnout Wisconsin the top-flight national swing state it was nearly 73%, as people decided their vote was in ’04—a place where the presidential counted. But in the spring of ’05, a fraction of candidates spent oodles of time, where cam- the 2.9 million voters who cast ballots in paigns—candidate, 527 and other groups— November will elect a state schools superinten- spent oodles of cash, and where political dent, a state Supreme Court justice, county junkies got to feast on oodles of goodies that executives in Dane and other counties, and their counterparts in the Californias and the numerous local judges, school board members, New Yorks of the world were denied.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2016-17 ANNUAL REPORT CELEBRATING OUR STEPS TOWARD SUCCESS VISIT WWW.NBEXCELLENCE.ORG DISTRICT MISSION: To empower, inspire and support students as they establish goals for their future and develop plans to achieve them. DISTRICT VISION: The School District of New Berlin fosters a learning environment in which our public schools, families, post-secondary partners, public officials, businesses, community organizations and other citizens work collaboratively to prepare all students to succeed in a diverse, change-oriented, global society. Don’t wait for next year’s Annual Report to read about the great things happening in our schools! TABLE OF CONTENTS facebook.com/ Message from the End-of-Year nbexcellence 3 Superintendent & Board 11 Celebrations twitter.com/ SDNBSchools District & School School Recognition 4 12 Celebrations The School District of New Berlin does not discriminate against individuals on the basis of age, sex, race, color, religion, national origin, Strategic Plan Community ancestry, creed, pregnancy, marital or parental Update Connections status, sexual orientation, or physical, mental, 7 20 emotional, or learning disability. Federal law prohibits discrimination in education and employment on the basis of age, race, color, College & Career Finances & national origin, sex, religion, or disability. 8 Readiness 21 Facilities Updates Learn more here: www.nbexcellence.org/ district/disclaimers.cfm 2 School District of New Berlin SUPERINTENDENT & SCHOOL BOARD MESSAGE We are excited to share with you the many highlights of the 2016-17 school year. Our Annual Report recaps the remarkable success our students and staff accomplished together in the School District of New Berlin. You will read about many achievements. Among them: teachers of the year; state rankings; athletic state champions and a National Blue Ribbon Program nominee.
    [Show full text]