DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Abstracts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PROGRAM OF The 113th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America Hyatt RegencyHotel © Indianapolis,Indiana ß 11-15 May 1987 MONDAY EVENING, 11 MAY 1987 CELEBRATION HALL, 7:00 TO 9:00 P.M. Tutorial Lecture Digital signalprocessing. Lawrence R. Rabiner(AT&T Bell Laboratories,Speech Research Department, Room 2D-533, Murray Hill, NJ 07974) In all fieldsof acoustics,the responseof systemsof interestinvolves the analysisand the processingof a signal.This signalcan be the radiatedacoustic pressure from a hydrophone,the accelerationof a massdue to localacoustic excitation, the speech of a spokenword, or themelodious pattern of a musicinstrument. In each of thesecases the signal has to beprocessed and analyzed. The field of digitalsignal processing isone area that hasbeen attracting more interest over the last few years. In thistutorial the field of digitalsignal processing (DSP) will beexplained together with the theory of linearsystems, sampling, and spectrum analysis. Compari- sonsbetween digital and analog processing will be discussed.Other topics that will be presentedare discrete Fourier series,sampling, aliasing, FIR and fIR filters,spectrum analysis, and fast Fourier transform.The sessionwill concludewith detailedexamples of applicationsof digitalsystems in differentareas of interestsuch ascommunication in generaland speechprocessing. TUESDAY MORNING, 12 MAY 1987 REGENCY BALLROOM A & B, 8:15 TO 11:54 A.M. SessionA. SpeechCommunication I: SpeechPerception Robert A. Fox, Chairman Departmentof Speechand HearingScience, Ohio State University,Columbus, Ohio 432]0 Chairman's Introduetion---8:15 ContributedPapers 8:20 tiveand negative attributes, the implications of whichwill bediscussed for a neuromorphictheory of speechperception. [Work supported,in part, A1. The problem of serial order in auditory word recognition.Howard by NIH. ] C. Nusbaum (Department of BehavioralSciences, The Universityof Chicago,58;48 S. UniversityAvenue, Chicago, IL 60637), Steven L. Greenspan(AT&T Bell Laboratories,Naperville, IL 60566), and Mathew Jensen(Department of BehavioralSciences, The Universityof 8:32 Chicago,Chicago, IL 60637) A2. The neighborhoodactivation model of auditory word recognition. Recently,there has been a resurgenceof interestin paralleldistributed PaulA. Lute (SpeechResearch Laboratory, Department of Psychology, processingmodels of humanperception. When speechperception is mod- Indiana University, Bloomington,IN 47405) eledin thistype of spatiallydistributed network, a problemarises in cod- ing the temporalorder of perceptualunits such as phoneroes or words.In The neighborhoodactivation model (NAM) of auditoryword recog- general,three solutions to thisproblem have been proposed: First, percep- nitiondescribes the processes by whicha stimulusword is identified in the tual unitsmay be contextcoded such as in context-sensitiveallophones. contextof phoneticallysimilar words activated in memory.Stimulus in- The orderof unitspresented at differentpoints in time canbe determined put activatesa setof acoustic-phoneticpatterns in memorythat mustbe by matchingthe context"edges" of eachactivated unit. Second,different discriminatedand chosenamong. These acoustic-phonetic patterns re- portionsof the networkmay representdifferent time frames.By this ap- ceiveactivation levels proportional to their similaritiesto the stimulus proach,the recognition of eachsuccessive perceptual unit activates repre- input.The activationlevels may thenbe adjustedby biasesarising from sentationsin successivesegments of the network.Finally, temporalorder higher-levelinformation, such as word frequency.The interactionof the may ba representedin the computational dynamicsof the network. In this bottom-up sensoryinput and top-down biasinginformation is assumedto case,expectations about serial order are used to shiftthe focus of process- takeplace within individualprocessing units called word decisionunits. ing attentionwithin the network.Thus, while the first two approaches These units monitor the activation levelsof their acoustic-phoneticpat- recodetemporal order into a spatialor spatial-likerepresentation, the terns, any higher-levelinformation that may optimize decisionsamong third usesa temporalrepresentation. Each of theseapproaches has posi- the competingpatterns, and the activity of all other word decisionunits. Sl J. Acoust.Soc. Am. Suppl.1, Vol. 81, Spring1987 113thMeeting: Acoustical Society of America Sl The NAM statesthat increasingthe numberof acoustic-phoneticpat- of talkeruncertainty on encoding speech into memory. In orderto exam- ternsactivated in memoryby thestimulus input will slowprocessing and inethis problem, a serial-orderedrecall experiment was conducted. The reduceidentification accuracy. It alsostates that effects of wordfrequency stimuliwere CVC monosyllabicEnglish words produced by different are directly tied to the numberand nature of similar wordsactivated in maleand female talkers. Listeners were presented with lists of tenitems memoryand that wordfrequency is notintrinsic to theactivation levels of producedby a singlertalker or listsof tenitems produced by multiple the acoustic-phoneticpatterns. [Work supportedby NIH Grant NS- talkers,and were required to recallthe items in theorder presented. Per- 12179.] centcorrect recall in theprimary region of theserial position curve was loweras the amountof talkervariability within the listsincreased. The resultssuggest that the encoding of speechinto memory is affectedby uncertaintyfrom trial to trial due to talker variability. The hypothesis that 8:44 perceptualprocesses involved in talker normalizationare locatedat an auditory-to-phoneticlevelwill be discussed. [Work supported by NIH.] A3. Auditory word recognitionis not more sensitiveto word-initial than to word-final stimulus information. M. J. van der Vlugt and S. G. Nooteboom (Institute for PerceptionResearch, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) 9:20 Severalaccounts of the humanrecognition of spokenwords assign A6. The lexicalstatus effect on placeof articulationand voice onset time specialimportance to stimulus-wordonsets. The experimentdescribed contrasts.Marjorie A. Reed (Departmentof Psychology,Cleveland herewas designed to findout whethersuch a word-beginningsuperiority StateUniversity, Cleveland, OH 44115) effectis due to a specialsensitivity of the word recognitionprocess to Ganong [J. Exp. Psychol.:Hum. Percept.Perform. 6, 110-125 word-initialstimulus information, or ratherto the specialimportance of (1980) ] firstreported that the presenceof a wordat oneend of a voice word onsetsfor the proper alignmentof stimuli with word candidates. onsettime seriesinfluenced the classificationof stimuli near the bound- Twenty-eightpolysyllabic monomorphematic test words were selected, ary.Fox [Percept.Psychophys. 34, 526-540(1983)] reporteda similar all havingthe special characteristic that their left-to-right and right-to-left effectusing place of articulationstimuli. In thepresent experiment, the recognitionpoints coincided in the samephoneme. These words were lexicalstatus effect on two voice onset time continuua (/bot/to/pot/and synthesizedfrom diphones, and, of eachword, four versionswere pre- /bok/ to /pok/) wascompared to that on two placeof articulation pared:(a) withoutnoise; (b) with noisemasking segment perception in continuua(/bon/ to /don/ and/bop/ to/dop/). Resultsshowed effects theword-initial fragment; (c) with noisemasking segment perception in of lexicalstatus for bothtypes of stimuli.Ambiguous tokens near the the word-finalfragment; and (d) with noisemasking the wholeword. categoryboundary were perceived in favorof theword, while the classifi- Thesestimuli were, appropriately blocked, distributed over four stimulus cationof endpointstimuli was not influenced.The lexicalstatus effect was tapes,and presentedto four groupsof 12 subjectsfor word recognition. significantlylarger for voice onset time stimuli than for place of articula- Percentagescorrectly recognized real words were, for thefour conditions: tionstimuli. This difference may result from the time required for the (a) 89%, (b) 54%, (c) 59%, and (d) 13%. The differencebetween (b) lexicalstatus effect to develop, suggesting alternate interpretation ofFox's and (c) wasnot significant. This is interpretedas evidence that ( 1) audi- data on the time courseof the effect.Implications for interactiveand tory word recognitionis not moresensitive to word-initialthan to word- separatestage models are discussed. finalstimulus information, and (2) stimulusinformation from all partsof a spokenword can be used efficiently, as long as its proper time alignment with word candidates in the mind of the listener is ensured. 9:32 A7.Context effects in spoken language. Robert Pedlow (Speech 8:56 ResearchLaboratory, Department of Psychology,Indiana University, Bloomington,IN 47405) A4. Effects of talker uncertaintyI: Auditory word recognition.Iohn W. Mullennix,David B. Pisoni,and ChristopherS. Martin (Speech Theeffects of differenttypes of linguisticcontext on theintelligibility ResearchLaboratory, Department of Psychology,Indiana University, of spokenlanguage were examined. A setof wordswas produced by the Bloomington,IN 47405) samespeakers in threedifferent types of linguisticcontext: ordinary sen- tences,anomalous sentences, and a word list context. The anomalous The productionand resulting acoustic composition of spokenwords sentenceswere constructed by changingone nonadjacent-to-target word varyas functions of individualtalker characteristics. However, the effects to an anomalousalternative.
Recommended publications
  • Springer Handbook of Auditory Research

    Springer Handbook of Auditory Research

    Springer Handbook of Auditory Research Series Editors: Richard R. Fay and Arthur N. Popper For other titles published in this series, go to www.springer.com/series/2506 wwww Mary Florentine • Arthur N. Popper Richard R. Fay Editors Loudness with 75 Illustrations Editors Mary Florentine Richard R. Fay Department of Speech-Language Pathology Department of Psychology and Audiology with joint appointment in Loyola University Chicago Department of Electrical and Computer Chicago, IL Engineering USA Northeastern University [email protected] Boston, MA 02115 USA [email protected] Arthur N. Popper Department of Biology University of Maryland College Park, MD USA [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-6711-4 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-6712-1 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6712-1 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2010938801 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connec- tion with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.
  • Measures of the Ecological Loudness of Speech

    Measures of the Ecological Loudness of Speech

    1 8 Tobias Neher et al. REFERENCES Measures of the ecological loudness of speech Akeroyd, M.A. (2008). “Are individual differences in speech reception related to 1,3,4 2,3,4 individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental MARY FLORENTINE AND MICHAEL EPSTEIN studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults” Int. J. Audiol. Suppl. 2 47, 1 S53-S73. Communication Research Laboratory 2 Auditory Modeling and Processing Laboratory Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound 3 Localization (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Dept. of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and Institute for Hearing, Speech, and Language Behrens, T., Neher, T., and Johannesson, R.B. (2008). “Evaluation of speech corpus 4 for assessment of spatial release from masking” in Proceedings of ISAAR 2007: Communications and Digital Processing Center, ECE Department Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners. 1st International Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, 02115 USA Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research. Elsinore, Denmark. Edited Most laboratory studies of binaural loudness summation show ample by T. Dau, J.M. Buchholz, J. Harte, and T.U. Christiansen. ISBN: 87-990013-1- amounts of summation (e.g., a tone presented binaurally is clearly louder 4. (The Danavox Jubilee Foundation, Copenhagen), pp. 449-457. than the same tone presented monaurally), but classroom demonstrations of Daneman, M., and Carpenter, P.A. (1980). “Individual differences in integrating this phenomenon in typical daily environments yield negligible loudness information between and within sentences” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. summation for most listeners. To gain insight into this difference, 9, 561-584.
  • Tuning Curves and Pitch Matches in a Listener with a Unilateral, Low-Frequency Hearing Loss

    Tuning Curves and Pitch Matches in a Listener with a Unilateral, Low-Frequency Hearing Loss

    Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss Citation for published version (APA): Florentine, M., & Houtsma, A. J. M. (1983). Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low- frequency hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73(3), 961-965. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.389021 DOI: 10.1121/1.389021 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/1983 Document Version: Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers) Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.
  • Meeting Abstracts

    Meeting Abstracts

    PROGRAM OF The 118th Meeting of the AcousticalSociety of America Adam's Mark Hotel ß St. Louis, Missouri ß 27 November-1 December 1989 MONDAY EVENING, 27 NOVEMBER 1989 ST. LOUIS BALLROOM D, 7:00 TO 9:00 P.M. Tutorial on Architectural Acoustics Mauro Pierucci, Chairman Departmentof Aerospaceand EngineeringMechanics, San DiegoState University,San Diego, California 92182 TUI. Architecturalacoustics: The forgottendimension. Ewart A. Wetherill (Wilson, lhrig, and Associates, lnc., 5776 Broadway,Oakland, CA 94618) The basic considerationsof architeclural acouslics---isolation from unwanled noise and vibration, control of mechanicalsystem noise, and room acousticsdesign---are all clearly exemplifiedin Sabinc'sdesign for BostonSymphony Hall. Openedin ! 900,this hall isone of theoutstanding successes in musical acoustics. Yet, aswe approachthe hundredthanniversary of Sabine'sfirst experiments, acoustical characteristics remain one of the leastconsidered aspects of buildingdesign. This is due, in part, to the difficultyof visualizingthe acouslicaloutcome of designdecisions, complicated by individualjudgment as to whatconstitutes good acous- tics. However,the lack of a comprehensiveteaching program remains the dominantproblem. Significant advancesover the past 2 or 3 decadesin measurementand evaluationhave refinedthe ability to design predictabilityand to demonsIrateacoustical concerns to others. New techniquessuch as sound intensity measurements,new descriptors for roomacoustics phenomena, and the refinemen t of recording,analysis, and amplificationtechniques provide fresh insights into the behaviorof soundin air and other media.These topics are reviewedwith particularemphasis on the needfor a comparableadvance in translationof acousticprinci- plesinto buildingtechnologies. Sl J. Acoust.Soc. Am. Suppl. 1, VoL86, Fall1989 118thMeeting: Acoustical Society of America S1 TUESDAY MORNING, 28 NOVEMBER 1989 ST. LOUIS BALLROOM C, 8:00 A.M. TO 12:00 NOON SessionA.
  • Pinotfile Vol 7 Issue 9

    Pinotfile Vol 7 Issue 9

    Pinot Noir is what real wine drinkers want to drink Volume 7, Issue 9 January 1, 2009 2008 Pinot Noir All-Americans As 2008 wraps up, “Best of 2008” lists are traditional and what better analogy for great American Pinot Noir than to name the best performers “All-Americans.” As I have done the past few years, I am proud to present the Pinot Noir All-Americans of 2008, the best wines I drank out of the over 1,000 American Pinot Noirs I formally sampled over the past year. Pinot Noir in California and Oregon is now of such consistently high quality that it is difficult to single out wines that stand out from the pack. It is a testimony to the cadre of passionate winegrowers who have scoffed at the suggestion that Pinot Noir is a “heartbreak grape” and have successfully corralled the grape’s temperamental nature. The 2008 All-Americans were chosen in the spirit of celebration of the copious bounty of Pinot Noir that we are blessed with in this country. The All-Americans were selected as much for their fruity, flirty, New World hedonism as for their description-defying sensuality. These wines were technically complete, but more significantly, they displayed a powerful charisma. It is a truth that it is not what is written but what is emoted that truly defines a wine’s greatness. Veronique Drouhin, winemaker at Oregon’s Domaine Drouhin, echoes my sentiments perfectly when she said, “There are plenty of good wines in the world that give you pleasure. A great wine gives you emotion.” The stylistic split of power versus finesse or “New World” against “Old World,” is still ever present, but the superiority of either style is a tired argument.
  • 156 a Half-Century's Perspective on Békésy

    156 a Half-Century's Perspective on Békésy

    A HALF-CENTURY’S PERSPECTIVE ON BÉKÉSY TRACKING AND LOUDNESS GROWTH AT THRESHOLD 1 1,2 Elizabeth Rooney and Mary Florentine Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 2 Northeastern University (106-A FR), 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 USA [email protected] and [email protected] Abstract In the more than half a century since Georg von Békésy was awarded the Nobel Prize, many of his findings have stood the test of time. Implications of the width of the excursions in the Békésy tracking procedure, however, are not as simple as described in his classic book, Experiments in Hearing (von Békésy, 1960). The interpretations of his findings have created some misunderstandings in hearing science and audiology. This article reviews a large body of data on Békésy tracking and more recent threshold, discrimination, and loudness data in order to answer the following question: Is the width of the excursions a reliable indicator of cochlear pathology? In 1947, von Békésy described a new audiometer and claimed that this new audiometer permitted the testing of recruitment. Recruitment has been defined as a rapid growth in loudness above the threshold of hearing (Fowler,1936; Steinberg and Gardner, 1937; Brunt, 1994) and was believed to be associated with all cochlear hearing losses (Dix, Hallpike, and Hood, 1948). The audiometer was automated. As the frequency of the signal increased slowly, the subject pressed a button when the signal was audible and released it when inaudible. This pressing and releasing of the button caused the level of the signal to decrease or increase, respectively, and a visible tracing of the excursions (or trackings) between the just-audible and just-inaudible pulsed tones could be observed on recording paper that was attached to a rotating drum.
  • Temporal Integration of Loudness in Listeners with Hearing Losses of Primarily Cochlear Origin

    Temporal Integration of Loudness in Listeners with Hearing Losses of Primarily Cochlear Origin

    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Sep 25, 2021 Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin Buus, Søren; Florentine, Mary; Poulsen, Torben Published in: Acoustical Society of America. Journal Link to article, DOI: 10.1121/1.424673 Publication date: 1999 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Buus, S., Florentine, M., & Poulsen, T. (1999). Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin. Acoustical Society of America. Journal, 105(6), 3464-3480. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.424673 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origina) b) So”ren Buus Communication and Digital Signal
  • Volume Preface

    Volume Preface

    Springer Handbook of Auditory Research Series Editors: Richard R. Fay and Arthur N. Popper For other titles published in this series, go to www.springer.com/series/2506 wwww Mary Florentine • Arthur N. Popper Richard R. Fay Editors Loudness with 75 Illustrations Editors Mary Florentine Richard R. Fay Department of Speech-Language Pathology Department of Psychology and Audiology with joint appointment in Loyola University Chicago Department of Electrical and Computer Chicago, IL Engineering USA Northeastern University [email protected] Boston, MA 02115 USA [email protected] Arthur N. Popper Department of Biology University of Maryland College Park, MD USA [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-6711-4 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-6712-1 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6712-1 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2010938801 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connec- tion with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.
  • Artist Title Count ATB FT. TOPIC & A7S YOUR LOVE 102 KID LAROI

    Artist Title Count ATB FT. TOPIC & A7S YOUR LOVE 102 KID LAROI

    Artist Title Count ATB FT. TOPIC & A7S YOUR LOVE 102 KID LAROI WITHOUT YOU 96 ROBIN SCHULZ FT. KIDDO ALL WE GOT 95 JASON DERULO FT. NUKA LOVE NOT WAR 91 OFENBACH & QUARTERHEAD HEAD SHOULDERS KNEES & TOES 90 PURPLE DISCO MACHINE & SOPHIE AND THEHYPNOTIZED GIANTS 86 OLIVIA RODRIGO DRIVERS LICENSE 82 AVA MAX MY HEAD & MY HEART 81 THE WEEKND SAVE YOUR TEARS 77 JOEL CORRY FT. RAYE & DAVID GUETTA BED 75 MILEY CYRUS FT. DUA LIPA PRISONER 73 TIESTO THE BUSINESS 73 TWOCOLORS LOVEFOOL 67 CLEAN BANDIT & MABEL TICK TOCK 61 JC STEWART I NEED YOU TO HATE ME 60 SIGALA & JAMES ARTHUR LASTING LOVER 59 MEDUZA FT. DERMOT KENNEDY PARADISE 58 TATE MCRAE YOU BROKE ME FIRST [LUCA SCHREINER REMIX]58 SHANE CODD GET OUT MY HEAD 57 JUSTIN BIEBER ANYONE 56 SAM SMITH DIAMONDS 55 DERMOT KENNEDY GIANTS 54 RUDIMENTAL FT. RAYE REGARDLESS 54 ALLE FARBEN & FOOL'S GARDEN LEMON TREE 53 SHAWN MENDES WONDER 53 TOM GREGORY RATHER BE YOU 53 JOEL CORRY FT. MNEK HEAD AND HEART 52 HARRY STYLES GOLDEN 51 TAYLOR SWIFT WILLOW 51 DUA LIPA WE'RE GOOD 50 ED SHEERAN AFTERGLOW 50 KYGO & DONNA SUMMER HOT STUFF 49 MICHAEL PATRICK KELLY BEAUTIFUL MADNESS 49 MALUMA & THE WEEKND HAWAI 49 MILEY CYRUS MIDNIGHT SKY 49 RITON X NIGHTCRAWLERS FRIDAY 49 RAG'N'BONE MAN ALL YOU EVER WANTED 47 BTS DYNAMITE 45 REGARD FT. RAYE SECRETS 45 ROBIN SCHULZ FT. FELIX JAEHN & ALIDA ONE MORE TIME 44 PURPLE DISCO MACHINE FEAT. MOSS KENA &FIREWORKS THE KNOCKS 43 DAVID PUENTEZ SUPERSTAR 42 JASON DERULO TAKE YOU DANCING 42 NATHAN EVANS WELLERMAN (220 KID X BILLEN TED RMX) 41 J BALVIN, DUA LIPA & BAD BUNNY UN DIA (ONE DAY) 40 LADY GAGA & ARIANA GRANDE RAIN ON ME 40 ZOE WEES GIRLS LIKE US 38 DIODATO FAI RUMORE 37 JUBEL & NEIMY DANCING IN THE MOONLIGHT 37 THE WEEKND BLINDING LIGHTS 37 TOPIC FEAT.
  • International Hearing Aid Research Conference August 13 – 17, 2008

    International Hearing Aid Research Conference August 13 – 17, 2008

    IHCON 2008 International Hearing Aid Research Conference August 13 – 17, 2008 GRANLIBAKKEN CONFERENCE CENTER LAKE TAHOE, CALIFORNIA IHCON 2008 SPONSORS National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Department of Veterans' Affairs Deafness Research UK The Gatehouse Memorial Lecture (sponsored by the Oticon Foundation and the MHR Institute of Hearing Research, and administered by the House Ear Institute) The House Ear Institute IHCON 2008 2 August 13-17, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conference Sponsors ...................................................2 Table of Contents.........................................................3 Planning Committee.....................................................4 Student Scholarship Recipients……………………....5 Daily Schedule…………………………………….....6 Program Summary………………………………..7-12 Oral Program........................................................ 13-42 Poster Program, Session A................................... 43-66 Poster Program, Session B................................... 67-90 Poster Program, Session C................................. 91-113 Conference Attendees ...................................... 114-122 IHCON 2008 3 August 13-17, 2008 IHCON 2008 Planning Committee Technical Chair Brian Moore Technical Co-Chair Judy Dubno Jan Wouters Organizational Co-Chair Sigfrid Soli Steering Committee Michael Akeroyd Brent Edwards, Past Technical Co-Chair MRC Institute of Hearing Research Starkey Hearing Research Center Ian Bruce Mary Florentine McMaster University Northeastern University Laurel

  • Loudness Functions for Long and Short Tones

    LOUDNESS FUNCTIONS FOR LONG AND SHORT TONES Mary Florentine,1,2 Michael Epstein,1,3 and Søren Buus1,3 1Institute for Hearing, Speech, and Language 2Dept. of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology (133 FR) 3Communications and Digital Signal Processing Center, ECE Dept. (440 DA) Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract This study tests the Equal-Loudness-Ratio hypothesis [Florentine et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1633-1644 (1996)], which states that the loudness ratio between equal-SPL long and short tones is independent of SPL. The amount of temporal integration (i.e., the level difference between equally loud short and long sounds) is maximal at moderate levels. Therefore, the Equal-Loudness-Ratio hypothesis predicts that the loudness function is shallower at moderate levels than at low and high levels. Equal-loudness matches and cross- modality string-length matches were used to assess the form of the loudness function for 5- and 200-ms tones at 1 kHz and the loudness ratio between them. Results from nine normal listeners show that (1) the amount of temporal integration is largest at moderate levels, in agreement with previous studies, and (2) the loudness functions are shallowest at moderate levels. For eight of the nine listeners, the loudness ratio between the 200- and 5-ms tones is approximately constant, except at low levels where it tends to increase. The average data show good agreement between the two methods, but discrepancies are apparent for some individuals.
  • Tribute Over Wsai Moved Into the Netherland Plaza in Cincinnati, Succeeding Horace Heidt

    Tribute Over Wsai Moved Into the Netherland Plaza in Cincinnati, Succeeding Horace Heidt

    WEEKLY Volume 1, No. 48 WEEK ENDING APRIL 21, 1932 Price 5c Gus Arnheim Now Men Forget L ap Year Lives Heard Over WLW Sousa's Spirit From th Flaza As Massed Bands Pay Gus Arnheim and his Cocoanut Grove (Los Angeles) Orchestra have Tribute over WSAi moved into the Netherland Plaza in Cincinnati, succeeding Horace Heidt. The Arnheim band scored Army, Navy and Marine a hit last winter while broadcasting Stoopnagle and over \\TBM from the Cafe Winter Musicians In Stirring Garden in Chicago. Budd Will Show Memorial on NBC WLW is broadcasting the Arnheim At Albee Soon melodies. Dorothy Thomas a n d Buddy Clark, vocalists, and the Three Stoopnagle and Mudd. ene of -1 hard concert unsurpassed in the Rhythm Rascals are featured in _Arn- Procter & Gamble's four radio o rirI s iistorv- will rise from the heim' band of 19. acts now at large over the air. massed instruments of the Army, will play the RRO-Albee Tine Lucky Dance at Nary and Marine bands in tribute to Strike Hour- in with the help of incbell and Theater Cincinnati next Walter \\ month. the late Jelin Philip Sousa Sunday his "Clean, Cincinnati !"-will carry of (April 17) at 1n:'n p. music front the Plaza Their elate. as well as that Arui.ci-n's hate Smiths appearance at the Thursday (April 14) at in p. in. over ILSAI will be the local outlet for saine theater, will be announced this NBC -W1 -].A I memorial. WS _A1 (NBC -WEAL). soon. Len Bernie will open his wcele Some ii American andand Canadian hand at the _Albee on Saturday IApril -loaders will (fired the bauds WM Announces irtnn Constitution flail, Washing- h 01, D.