DOCSLIB.ORG

9789004289543.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9789004289543.Pdf Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo Philosophia Antiqua a series of studies on ancient philosophy Editorial Board Ch. Wildberg (Princeton) K.A. Algra (Utrecht) F.A.J. de Haas (Leiden) J. Mansfeld (Utrecht) C.J. Rowe (Durham) D.T. Runia (Melbourne) Previous Editors J.H. Waszink† W.J. Verdenius† J.C.M. Van Winden† volume 140 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/pha Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo Edited by Sylvain Delcomminette Pieter d’Hoine Marc-Antoine Gavray leiden | boston Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ancient readings of Plato's Phaedo / edited by Sylvain Delcomminette, Pieter d'Hoine, Marc-Antoine Gavray. pages cm. – (Philosophia antiqua, ISSN 0079-1687 ; volume 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-28217-9 (hardback : acid-free paper) – ISBN 978-90-04-28954-3 (e-book) 1. Plato. Phaedo. 2. Immortality (Philosophy) 3. Death. I. Delcomminette, Sylvain, editor. II. Hoine, Pieter d', editor. III. Gavray, Marc-Antoine, editor. B379.A95 2015 184–dc23 2015026854 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, ipa, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. issn 0079-1687 isbn 978-90-04-28217-9 (hardback) isbn 978-90-04-28954-3 (e-book) Copyright 2015 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill nv incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi and Hotei Publishing. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill nv provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, ma 01923, usa. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Contents List of Contributors vii Introduction 1 Sylvain Delcomminette, Pieter d’Hoine and Marc-Antoine Gavray Aristote et le Phédon 17 Sylvain Delcomminette Strato of Lampsacus as a Reader of Plato’s Phaedo: His Critique of the Soul’s Immortality 37 Han Baltussen Le Phédon dans le Stoïcisme hellénistique et post-hellénistique 63 Francesca Alesse Sextus, the Number Two and the Phaedo 90 Lorenzo Corti Plutarch’s Reception of Plato’s Phaedo 107 Geert Roskam The Phaedo in Numenian Allegorical Interpretation 134 Harold Tarrant Plotin lecteur du Phédon: l’âme et la vie en iv 7 [2] 11 154 Riccardo Chiaradonna Syrianus and the Phaedo 173 Pieter d’Hoine Damascius, Olympiodore et Proclus sur les attributs «divin» (θεῖον) et «intelligible» (νοητόν) en Phédon 80a10–b1 dans l’argument dit «de la similitude» 212 Alain Lernould vi contents From ‘Immortal’ to ‘Imperishable’: Damascius on the Final Argument in Plato’s Phaedo 240 Sebastian Gertz La théorie de l’âme-harmonie chez les commentateurs anciens 256 Franco Trabattoni «Nombreux sont les porteurs de thyrse, mais rares les Bacchants». Olympiodore et Damascius sur le Phédon 270 Bram Demulder et Gerd Van Riel Au terme d’une tradition: Simplicius, lecteur du Phédon 293 Marc-Antoine Gavray Bibliography 311 Index locorum 336 Index nominum 357 Index rerum 360 List of Contributors Francesca Alesse is Senior Researcher at the Istituto per il Lessico Intellettuale Europeo e Storia delle Idee (iliesi) of the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Rome). Her main areas of research are the Socratic tradition and Hellenistic philosophy. Han Baltussen is the Hughes Professor of Classics at the University of Adelaide and a Fellow of the Australian Academy of the Humanities. He has published on a wide range of topics in intellectual history and is the author of Theophrastus against the Presocratics and Plato (2000) and Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius (2008). He is currently preparing a monograph on grief and consolation in Antiquity. Riccardo Chiaradonna is Associate Professor of Ancient Philosophy at the Università degli Studi Roma Tre (Rome). His main areas of research are the Ancient Platonic and Aris- totelian traditions, Galen, and Plotinus. Lorenzo Corti is Lecturer in Ancient Philosophy at the Université de Lorraine and a member of the Archives Henri-Poincaré in Nancy, France. His research interests include ancient scepticism, Hellenistic epistemologies, Aristotle’s metaphysics, and the philosophy of language. Sylvain Delcomminette is Professor of Ancient Philosophy at the Université Libre de Bruxelles. He has written monographs on Plato’s Statesman (Brussels, 2000) and Philebus (Leiden, 2006) and is currently working on the topic of necessity in Aristotle. Bram Demulder is a PhD Fellow of the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek—Vlaanderen (fwo). At ku Leuven he is currently preparing a dissertation on the Platonism of Plutarch of Chaeronea. Pieter d’Hoine is Assistant Professor of Ancient Philosophy and Intellectual History at the De Wulf—Mansion Centre for Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy (ku Leuven). His main area of research is later Neoplatonic metaphysics. viii list of contributors Marc-Antoine Gavray is Research Associate of the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (Bel- gium). He teaches Ancient Philosophy at the Université de Liège. He works on the Sophists, on Plato, and on late Neoplatonism (mainly Damascius and Sim- plicius). Sebastian Gertz is Supernumerary Teaching Fellow in Philosophy at St. John’s College, Oxford. His main area of research is Ancient Philosophy, and particularly Neoplaton- ism. Alain Lernould is Research Fellow at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Uni- versité de Lille). He has published Physique et Théologie. Lecture du Timée de Platon par Proclus (2001), Études sur le commentaire de Proclus au premier livre des Éléments d’Euclide (2010), and Plutarque, le Visage qui apparaît dans le disque de la Lune (2013). He is currently working on a new edition and trans- lation of Proclus’ commentary on Euclid’s Elements. Geert Roskam is Associate Professor at the Faculty of Arts (ku Leuven). He is the author of many books and articles on Hellenistic philosophy (esp. Epicureanism) and later Platonism (Plutarch and others). Harold Tarrant is Professor Emeritus at the University of Newcastle Australia, and worked in Australia from 1973 to 2011. His major publications tackle various aspects of the Platonic tradition in Antiquity. Franco Trabattoni is Professor of Ancient Philosophy at the Università degli Studi di Milano. His main areas of research concern Plato and the Platonic tradition, as well as Aristotle’s reception of Platonism and its repercussions within the Aristotelian tradition. Gerd Van Riel is Professor of Ancient Philosophy at the De Wulf-Mansion Centre for Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy (ku Leuven). His main research areas are Plato and the Platonic tradition, especially later Neoplatonism (Proclus, Damascius), and St. Augustine. Introduction Sylvain Delcomminette, Pieter d’Hoine and Marc-Antoine Gavray For Western culture, Plato’s Phaedo is above all the story of Socrates’ death. Set on the very last day of the great philosopher’s life, the dialogue begins with a gathering of his closest friends who pay him a last visit in prison, and ends with the drinking of the hemlock—followed by Socrates’ final words, an enigmatic reminder of a debt to Asclepius. Within this narrative frame, which arguably makes the Phaedo Plato’s most moving composition, the main part of the dialogue is devoted to the philosophical discussion that Socrates is supposed to have held with his friends on the day of his execution. As is well known, the theme of their exchanges is, appropriately, the immortality of the soul. In the course of their inquiry, however, the interlocutors address a wide range of issues, relating not only to psychology, but also to ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, the philosophy of nature, and cosmology. The importance of this dialogue for our understanding of Plato’s thought and indeed, for the history of Western philosophy as a whole, cannot be easily overestimated. Already in Antiquity, from Aristotle to the last of the Neoplatonists, the dialogue featured prominently in debates on the philosophical way of life, on the destiny of the soul in the afterlife, on Platonic Forms, on the acquisition of knowledge, on the virtues, and on many other topics. Even a superficial glance at the extant commentaries on the dialogue from Antiquity—all three derived from lecture notes by Damascius (ca. 462–550ad) and Olympiodorus (ca. 495/505–565) in the fifth and sixth century ad—reveals them to be the fruit of a long, although mostly lost, exegetical tradition. Unlike the dialogue itself, however, the Phaedo’s reception in Antiquity has received little scholarly attention in recent decades.1 This is unsurprising, given the provenance of the surviving commentaries: Damascius and Olympiodorus had to wait untill the quite recent past to re-emerge from a relative oblivion. Moreover, the 1 Notable exceptions include the excellent annotated edition and translation of the commen- taries by L.G. Westerink (The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo, 2 vol., ed. and trans. by L.G. Westerink, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1976–1977), which provides a mass of informa- tion, as yet unsurpassed, on the exegetical tradition of the dialogue, and the recent mono- graph by S. Gertz, Death and Immortality in Late Neoplatonism. Studies on the Ancient Com- mentators on Plato’s Phaedo, Leiden: Brill, 2011, which represents the first systematic survey of the entire commentaries. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2015 | doi: 10.1163/9789004289543_002 2 delcomminette, d’hoine and gavray great revival of Neoplatonic studies that we have witnessed in the past thirty or forty years was motivated less by a desire to better our own understanding of Plato by means of Neoplatonic insights into his writings than by the new- found appreciation for the Neoplatonists as important thinkers in their own right.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neoplatonism: the Last Ten Years
    The International Journal The International Journal of the of the Platonic Tradition 9 (2015) 205-220 Platonic Tradition brill.com/jpt Critical Notice ∵ Neoplatonism: The Last Ten Years The past decade or so has been an exciting time for scholarship on Neo­ platonism. I ought to know, because during my stint as the author of the “Book Notes” on Neoplatonism for the journal Phronesis, I read most of what was published in the field during this time. Having just handed the Book Notes over to George Boys­Stones, I thought it might be worthwhile to set down my overall impressions of the state of research into Neoplatonism. I cannot claim to have read all the books published on this topic in the last ten years, and I am here going to talk about certain themes and developments in the field rather than trying to list everything that has appeared. So if you are an admirer, or indeed author, of a book that goes unmentioned, please do not be affronted by this silence—it does not necessarily imply a negative judgment on my part. I hope that the survey will nonetheless be wide­ranging and comprehensive enough to be useful. I’ll start with an observation made by Richard Goulet,1 which I have been repeating to students ever since I read it. Goulet conducted a statistical analy­ sis of the philosophical literature preserved in the original Greek, and discov­ ered that almost three­quarters of it (71%) was written by Neoplatonists and commentators on Aristotle. In a sense this should come as no surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Phaedo Phil 310 – Syllabus
    Plato’s Phaedo phil 310 – Syllabus Instructor: Willie Costello Winter Quarter. Meetings on Wednesdays from 15:00 to 17:50 in Bldg 20Rm21g. Office hours on Tuesdays from 13:30 to 15:00 in Bldg 100 Rm 102m, or by appointment (email [email protected]). Course readings available from http://bit.ly/phaedobox. Course description This course is dedicated to a slow and close reading ofthe Phaedo. This dialogue, undoubtedly one of the greatest in Plato’s oeuvre, showcases the full range of his philosophical thought, touching on issues in ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, physics (or natural philosophy), psychology (in the literal sense of the word), philosophical methodology, and even the philosophy of language. The dialogue is also a literary masterpiece, featuring discussants with genuine personalities, a substantial frame dialogue which keeps reappearing throughout the work, various religious and cultic overtones, an evocative closing myth, and a final scene of as much pathos as any in Greek drama. On top of all this, the Phaedo is arguably the most “Platonic” of the dialogues; nowhere else in the corpus do we find as clear a statement of the theory of Forms and the immortality of the soul – the “twin pillars” of Platonism, as F. M. Cornford once called them. And yet, for all this, the Phaedo remains a perplexing work. For one thing, its arguments for the soul’s immortality are all generally thought to be failures; even some of the dialogue’s own participants remain not entirely convinced at the end. The basic conception of the soul on which it tacitly relies (viz., the conception of the soul as a simple particular substance) is not generally thought to be credible, either, and does not sit well with Plato’s tripartite analysis of the soul elsewhere (not to mention Aristotle’s subsequent hylomorphic analysis).
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on God's Transcendental Properties 1.Pdf
    The “Infinity” of the Transcendental Properties of God The “properties” of God, the so-called transcendental properties, which traditionally include being, goodness and truth, as well as others like beauty, are paradigm examples of properties that are not “measurable.” They are not properties that are amenable to extensive measure as that idea is understood in modern science (see notes on extensive measure). That is, they are not properties for which it is possible to define an experimental unit and an experimental operation of “adding” one unit to another (called concatenation in measure theory). The best that is available for “quantities” of masses like being, goodness, truth, and beauty is that they may be put in to an ordering of more to less without exact numerical evaluation. It follows that it is not possible to apply the modern mathematical notion of “the infinite” to such “quantities” because the modern notion presupposes that it is possible to count – apply numbers to – the quantities that are being measured. It also follows that the only sense in which the properties of God would be infinite in a sense that is appropriate to a non-numerical ordering. In God’s being, truth, goodness, etc. are infinite only in the sense that the quantity of the properties that God possesses is the greatest possible. Below are internet texts explaining the transcendental properties. See also Thomas Aquinas, De Veritate, Q1, Articles 1‐3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendentals Transcendentals From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the transcendental properties of being, for other articles about transcendence; see Transcendence (disambiguation).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Ofthe Danish Institute at Athens IV
    Proceedings ofthe Danish Institute at Athens IV Edited by Jonas Eiring and Jorgen Mejer © Copyright The Danish Institute at Athens, Athens 2004 The publication was sponsored by: The Danish Research Council for the Humanities Generalkonsul Gosta Enboms Fond. Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens General Editors: Jonas Eiring and Jorgen Mejer. Graphic design and production: George Geroulias, Press Line. Printed in Greece on permanent paper. ISBN: 87 7288 724 9 Distributed by: AARHUS UNIVERSITY PRESS Langelandsgade 177 DK-8200 Arhus N Fax (+45) 8942 5380 73 Lime Walk Headington, Oxford 0X3 7AD Fax (+44) 865 750 079 Box 511 Oakvill, Conn. 06779 Fax (+1)203 945 94 9468 Cover illustration: Finds from the Hellenistic grave at Chalkis, Aetolia. Photograph by Henrik Frost. The Platonic Corpus in Antiquity Jorgen Mejer Plato is the one and only philosopher particular edition which has determined from Antiquity whose writings have not only the Medieval tradition but also been preserved in their entirety. And our modern knowledge of Platonic dia not only have they been preserved, they logues, goes back to the Roman have been transmitted as a single col Emperor Tiberius' court-astrologer, lection of texts. Our Medieval manu Thrasyllus.2 Tarrant demonstrates rather scripts seem to go back to one particu convincingly that there is little basis for lar edition, an archetypus in two vol assuming that the tetralogical arrange umes, as appears from the subscript to ment existed before Thrasyllus, that it is the dialogue Menexenus, which is the possible to identify a philosophical posi last dialogue in the seventh tetralogy: tion which explains the tetralogies, that T8>iog toD JtQcbxou 6i6)dou.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Notice Neoplatonism: the Last Ten Years
    The International Journal The International Journal of the of the Platonic Tradition 9 (2015) 205-220 Platonic Tradition brill.com/jpt Critical Notice ∵ Neoplatonism: The Last Ten Years The past decade or so has been an exciting time for scholarship on Neo­ platonism. I ought to know, because during my stint as the author of the “Book Notes” on Neoplatonism for the journal Phronesis, I read most of what was published in the field during this time. Having just handed the Book Notes over to George Boys­Stones, I thought it might be worthwhile to set down my overall impressions of the state of research into Neoplatonism. I cannot claim to have read all the books published on this topic in the last ten years, and I am here going to talk about certain themes and developments in the field rather than trying to list everything that has appeared. So if you are an admirer, or indeed author, of a book that goes unmentioned, please do not be affronted by this silence—it does not necessarily imply a negative judgment on my part. I hope that the survey will nonetheless be wide­ranging and comprehensive enough to be useful. I’ll start with an observation made by Richard Goulet,1 which I have been repeating to students ever since I read it. Goulet conducted a statistical analy­ sis of the philosophical literature preserved in the original Greek, and discov­ ered that almost three­quarters of it (71%) was written by Neoplatonists and commentators on Aristotle. In a sense this should come as no surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • To Find the Maker and Father. Proclus' Exegesis of Plato Tim. 28C3-5
    Études platoniciennes 2 | 2006 Le Timée de Platon To find the maker and father. Proclus' exegesis of Plato Tim. 28c3-5 Jan Opsomer Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/1074 DOI: 10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.1074 ISSN: 2275-1785 Publisher Société d’Études Platoniciennes Printed version Date of publication: 16 June 2006 Number of pages: 261-283 ISBN: 978-2-251-44310-2 Electronic reference Jan Opsomer, « To find the maker and father. Proclus' exegesis of Plato Tim. 28c3-5 », Études platoniciennes [Online], 2 | 2006, Online since 11 August 2016, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/1074 ; DOI : 10.4000/ etudesplatoniciennes.1074 Études Platoniciennes est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. TO FIND THE MAKER AND FATHER. PROCLUS’ EXEGESIS OF PLATO TIM. 28C3-5* JAN OPSOMER The maker and father of this universe it is a hard task to find, and having found him, it would be impossible to declare him to everyone. to;n me;n ou\n poihth;n kai; patevra tou'de tou' panto;" euJrei'n te e[rgon kai; euJrovnta eij" a{panta" ajduvnaton levgein (Tim. 28C3-5) The ab ove quotation from Plato’s Ti m a e u s is for Pro clus the occasion to insert into his C o m m e n t a ry on the Ti m a e u s (1.299.13-319.21) an e l ab o rate discussion of the ontological status of the demiurge and of his predecessors’ views concerning this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILOSOPHY for the Purpose of the Present Work, I Shall Confine Myself
    CHAPTER TWO PHILOSOPHY For the purpose of the present work, I shall confine myself mainly to such of Iamblichus' philosophical views as are illustrated by the fragments of his Platonic Commentaries. A proper account of his philosophy as a whole must await a close analysis of Proclus' Platonic Theology, Damascius' Dubitationes et Solutiones, and Proclus' Commentary on the Parmenides, from which last that element which is Iamblichean will have to be carefully isolated on the basis of whatever can be learned from all other sources.1 lamblichus' system of philosophy is essentially an elaboration of Plotinus's Platonism, though strongly influenced by Neo­ pythagorean writings and the Chaldaean Oracles. Besides his teacher Anatolius, the writings of his fellow-countryman Nico­ machus of Gerasa (c. 120-196 2 A.D.) influenced him greatly. We find him making much use of the writings of 'Archytas', for in­ stance, in his Commentary on the Categories and in the Protrepticus, and of other Neopythagorean apocrypha. He believed, with Moderatus of Gades, that Plato was essentially a Pythagorean, and he pays great respect to Speusippus for the same reason. Following on the new direction given to philosophy by Plotinus a sequence of scholastic elaborations of doctrine arose by a sort of natural process. Plotinus' successors, Amelius, Porphyry, Iamblichus and Theodorus, are normally dismissed as second-rate and unoriginal. In comparison with Plotinus, certainly they were, but to condemn them absolutely for this is to condemn in the same breath the vast majority of philosophers of all eras and schools who have carried on and elaborated the thought of one 1 In the Parmenides-Commentary Proclus has gone much further than in the Timaeus-Commentary towards the complete masking of his sources, which sophistic stylistics seemed to favour.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Like Earthly Mercuries: Renaissance Platonism in Raphael's Stanza Della Segnatura
    FLYING LIKE EARTHLY MERCURIES: RENAISSANCE PLATONISM IN RAPHAEL’S STANZA DELLA SEGNATURA _____________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University Dominguez Hills ______________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Humanities _______________________ by Jeff Brinkman Summer 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS.....................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................iv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1 2. PLATO’S PREDECESSORS: THE MYSTERY CULTS AND ORPHISM....................7 3. PLATO AND THE SOUL..............................................................................................17 4. PLATO’S ANTECEDENTS..........................................................................................31 The Chaldean Oracles ...........................................................................................32 The Corpus Hermeticum........................................................................................37 Iamblichus..............................................................................................................41 5. FICINO, MIRANDOLA,
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION . Nature and Purpose of the Present Study
    INTRODUCTION . Nature and Purpose of the Present Study The ancient commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo offer a unique perspective on the study of Plato’s dialogue in late antiquity. Were it not for them, we would know very little about how ancient readers approached the text. Moreover, they throw an interesting light on broader subjects: the understanding of the philosophical life in the final phase of Greek Neo- platonism, and the significance which the doctrine of immortality held for the last Platonist thinkers in the ancient world. Yet,surprisingly, these commentaries have not benefited much from the revival of interest in the Platonic tradition in recent years, despite their relative accessibility in a highly praised edition.1 There are a number of possible reasons for this neglect. Their state of preservation does not encourage treating them as anything other than source material, and the loss of all prefatory mate- rial, which would have set out the general guidelines for interpretation, weighs heavily here. Of the commentaries by Olympiodorus and Damas- cius, furthermore, the one that is better preserved is, sadly, also the lesser in quality (Olympiodorus’); and while the sparse student notes taken from Damascius’ lecture courses do contain hints of doctrinal innova- tions, they are all too often silent about the reasoning that led to them. In this study, I hope to present and analyze the late Neoplatonic exe- gesis of Plato’s Phaedo by focusing on the issues of death and immortal- ity. Like Plato’s Socrates, the Neoplatonists did not think that death was the end. They turned to Plato’s dialogues (especially Republic, Phaedo and Phaedrus) to find arguments that would suggest something of us survives, and survives everlastingly, the death of our bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Athens and Byzantium: Platonic Political Philosophy in Religious Empire Jeremiah Heath Russell Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Athens and Byzantium: Platonic political philosophy in religious empire Jeremiah Heath Russell Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Russell, Jeremiah Heath, "Athens and Byzantium: Platonic political philosophy in religious empire" (2010). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2978. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2978 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. ATHENS AND BYZANTIUM: PLATONIC POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY IN RELIGIOUS EMPIRE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Jeremiah Heath Russell B.A., The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2001 M. Div., The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2003 M.A., Baylor University, 2006 August, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation was not possible without the numerous sources of support that I received throughout my graduate studies. First, I must thank my major professor, James R. Stoner, Jr., whose encouragement was there from my earliest days at LSU until the completion of this program. He is a model intellectual with an uncanny ability to identify the heart of the matter and to offer penetrating questions. My commitment to the importance of the political, reflected in this dissertation, I owe to him.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Socrates to First-Year Philosophy Students in Iran, Based on Plato’S Euthyphro by Maryam Forghani and Sofia a Koutlaki
    Teaching Socrates to First-year Philosophy Students in Iran, Based on Plato’s Euthyphro by Maryam Forghani and Sofia A Koutlaki discussions, but they are generally keen Abstract Introduction to question received ideas. As regards the second question, we Is it possible to teach philosophy to first- In order to highlight the importance of chose a Socratic dialogue because of the year philosophy students in a way similar this project, we raise three questions: Why importance of Plato’s works as to the one Socrates used to teach his inter- was this new plan introduced for first-year foundations of the western philosophical locutors in the early dialogues? Socrates students in philosophy? Why did we tradition which undoubtedly began with conducted challenging discussions in the choose ‘Socratic philosophy’ to introduce Socratic thought. Indeed, Socratic agora of Athens; he began with examin- philosophy to first-year students? And philosophy is the starting point of the ing everyday routine concepts, subjected why did we chose Plato’s Euthyphro in history of philosophy, so we reasoned his interlocutors to scrutiny—ἒλεγχος— order to do so? that students’ familiarity with it could help showed the contradictions in their think- In response to the first question, them develop an accurate understanding ing, and often finally arrived at both his first-year students were chosen for this of other western philosophies. and their ignorance. The starting point of project because according to the set Thirdly, we chose Euthyphro among this paper is whether is it possible to teach university curriculum, philosophy other Socratic dialogues because of its Socratic philosophy following the Socratic students in Iranian universities must pass subject-matter, namely piety.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Phaedo
    Platoʼs Phaedo - Classics - Oxford Bibliographies 10/9/17, 320 PM Plato’s Phaedo David Ebrey LAST MODIFIED: 23 AUGUST 2017 DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780195389661-0272 Introduction Plato’s Phaedo is set on the last day of Socrates’ life, ending with his moving death scene. The dialogue is one of Plato’s literary masterpieces, with classic discussions of forms, the immortality of the soul, and the value of the philosophical life. It is typically considered one of Plato’s middle-period dialogues due to its contrast between forms and sensible things, defense of the immortality of the soul, interest in natural science, and engagement with Pythagorean ideas. The primary interlocutors are Socrates, Simmias, and Cebes. Early in the dialogue, Socrates suggests that the poet Evenus should follow him in death. This shocks Simmias, leading Socrates first to defend the claim that a philosopher’s soul would be better separated from its body, and then the claim that the soul is immortal. Socrates’ four arguments for the immortality of the soul rely on considerations about the nature of change, causation, and the contrast between forms and sensible things. The two parts of the Phaedo that have received the most scholarship since the 1950s—among the most scholarship on any topic in ancient philosophy—are Socrates’ second argument for immortality, the Recollection Argument, which discusses central issues in Plato’s metaphysics and epistemology, and the so-called Autobiographical Section, which discusses Socrates’ earlier interest in natural science, the method of hypothesis, and his approach to providing causes. The dialogue ends with a long myth followed by Socrates’ death scene.
    [Show full text]