Reading Publics and Canon Formation in 20Th Century Us Fiction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Copyright by Laura Knowles Wallace 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Laura Knowles Wallace Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: QUEER NOVELTY: READING PUBLICS AND CANON FORMATION IN 20TH CENTURY US FICTION Committee: Brian Bremen, Supervisor Chad Bennett Ann Cvetkovich Jennifer Wilks Janet Staiger QUEER NOVELTY: READING PUBLICS AND CANON FORMATION IN 20TH CENTURY US FICTION by Laura Knowles Wallace, BA, MA Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2016 Dedication For who else but my students, whose insistent presence served as persistent reminder of the stakes of this project? The many ways contemporary queer readers and critics have invested pre-Stonewall writing and images with romance or nostalgia or distaste all point to the funny communicability of shadow-relations and secret emotions across time, as if they acquire heft only in the long term, where the difficulty of the problems they want to solve (like historical isolation and suffering) can emerge in their full intractability. Christopher Nealon, Foundlings, 2001 I don’t have to wonder whose group I’m in today. Certainly the people who always think the public problem is theirs are gay. Eileen Myles, “To Hell,” Sorry, Tree, 2007 Acknowledgements Thank you to my committee (Brian Bremen, Jennifer Wilks, Chad Bennett, Ann Cvetkovich, and Janet Staiger) for your time, your enthusiasm, and your questions. Thank you to the other faculty members whose teaching and encouragement shaped this project, especially Hannah Wojciehowski, Eric Darnell Pritchard, Mia Carter, and Heather Houser. And thank you to Amy Stewart and Patricia Schaub for their behind-the-scenes assistance. Thank you to the instructors who shaped my undergraduate mind at Kenyon College, and sowed the seeds of this project: Judy Smith, Sara Clarke Kaplan, Laurie Finke, William Klein, Joseph Adler, and most of all, my thesis advisor, Ted Mason. Thank you to the students in my two semesters of teaching Gay and Lesbian Literature and Culture at the University of Texas at Austin in Fall 2014 and Fall 2015. You challenged me, humbled me, made me laugh lot, and kept me honest. Thank you to my domestic partner, Billy Callis, and our dog, Maggie, for your love and support, and for reminding me every day that there is more to life than grad school. Thank you to the friends, colleagues, and family who supported me during the writing process, especially Margaret Rieley, Rhiannon Goad, Emily Lederman, Meredith Coffey, Anne Stewart, my parents, and my sister, Grace. vi Thank you to the baristas at Thunderbird, Flightpath, Monkey Nest, La Tazza Fresca, Genuine Joe, and the Caffe Medici on the Drag. I truly could not have done this without you. Most of all, thank you to my writing companions: Jenn Shapland, Jenny Howell, and Kendall Gerdes, who are not only intellectual and creative fellow travelers, but dear friends. To describe my debt to you, I’ve got to crib from Sedgwick: “The greatest gift from all these people has been encouragement: not only in the sense of narcissistic supply, though there’s no substitute for that, but in the root sense—they gave courage. On the whole there isn’t a vast amount of courage available to those who feel they want it, in the fairly protected (though notionally left-leaning) academic milieux in which scholars have today, when we’re lucky, the privilege of doing sustained intellectual work. […] courage of even the most spectacular nature isn’t after all a spectacle, an arena with fixed sightlines, but instead a kind of floating permeable rialto of common lending, borrowing, extravagant indebtedness, and exchange” (x). vii Queer Novelty: Reading Publics and Canon Formation in 20th Century US Fiction Laura Knowles Wallace, PhD The University of Texas at Austin, 2016 Supervisor: Brian Bremen Queer Novelty investigates the reception histories of four mid-twentieth-century novels that are now read as LGBTQ+ fiction in order to demonstrate how popular reading contributes to and complicates the constitution of gay and lesbian literature as a category in the academy and how early- to mid-twentieth-century print networks provided a framework for today’s digitally networked LGBTQ+ culture. Queer Novelty tracks the reception histories of four novels: Nightwood by Djuna Barnes, Two Serious Ladies by Jane Bowles, and Giovanni’s Room by James Baldwin. The archive for these histories encompasses scholarly analyses; reviews from newspapers and magazines; and online discussions on Goodreads and Amazon. Queer Novelty argues that reception studies demonstrate the force and effects of literary texts more fully than close reading, literary theory, or historical context alone, because reception study includes and accounts for shifts and variations in public reading practices and literary circulation. Queer Novelty brings together the investments of queer theory and affect theory, the methods of reception studies, and the writing practices of feminist criticism to demonstrate the possibilities of fiction reading in contemporary US culture. Chapter 1, “Thinking We Know Them, What Do We Know?” establishes the methodological framework for the project, focused on my theory of reading as public. Chapter 1 examines arguments for LGBTQ+ literature as a viii category, from Donald Webster Cory’s The Homosexual in America to discussions on Twitter and Tumblr in the 2010s. Chapter 2 reveals the feedback loop between popular and academic reception through the history of Nightwood, a canonical modernist text and a central text for queer female counterpublics. In Chapter 3, my analysis of Two Serious Ladies’ publication and reception histories is an investigation into the changing horizons of expectation that make yesterday’s odd novel today’s cult classic. In Chapter 4, I analyze the reception history of Giovanni’s Room and of Baldwin as a public intellectual to demonstrate how expectations about “gay literature” as a category have changed. Queer Novelty demonstrates that mid-20th century public cultures around books performed the groundwork necessary to keep them circulating, so that canons could be expanded when LGBTQ+ studies reached universities. ix Table of Contents List of Figures ....................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1: Thinking We Know Them, What Do We Know? : An Introduction ....1 My Archive .....................................................................................................4 Reading in Public, Feeling Public .................................................................10 Identity as Genre: A Brief History of “Gay and Lesbian Literature” ...........15 The Politics of Fiction: Diversity and Canon ...............................................24 Why Reception Studies: Feminist Expansions .............................................32 Why Reception History.................................................................................37 Why Queer Reception History ......................................................................43 Queer Novelty ...............................................................................................46 Chapter 2: “My History, Finally Invented”: Nightwood and Its Publics ..............49 Genres, Categories, and Paratexts .................................................................51 A Forgotten, Difficult Classic .......................................................................55 Modernist Difficulties and Early Reviews of Nightwood .............................59 Lesbians, Feminists, Queer Theory, and Djuna ............................................65 Conclusion: “One of Ours, but Not Our Own” .............................................74 Chapter 3: “The Dangers of Flirtation”: Giovanni’s Room and James Baldwin in Contemporary Culture ..................................................................................78 “The Dangers of Flirtation”: Giovanni’s Room in the 1950s .......................80 After Gay Liberation, Before Queer Theory .................................................95 Giovanni’s Room and the Academy ...........................................................101 Giovanni’s Room in (White Normative) Literary Publics ..........................107 James Baldwin and the Academy ...............................................................114 James Baldwin in Public in 2016 ................................................................118 Conclusion: Studying and Teaching Baldwin in the “Queer-Inflected Mood of the Black Lives Matter Era Now” ......................................................126 Chapter 4: “Visions of a Nutty America”: Legends of Two Serious Ladies .......131 1943 Reviews of Two Serious Ladies .........................................................138 x “Up from Underground”: Two Serious Ladies in the Sixties .....................141 Bowles’s Underground Reputation in the 21st Century ..............................149 “Only Feelings and Feminist Obsessions” : Jane Bowles and the Second Wave ............................................................................................................153 Lesbian Sensibilities, Lesbian Bookshelves ...............................................159 Two Serious Ladies and Internet Feminism ................................................164 Conclusion: