DOCSLIB.ORG

Air and Space Power Journal: September-October 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air and Space Power Journal: September-October 2014 September–October 2014 Volume 28, No. 5 AFRP 10-1 Features Forward Arming and Refueling Points for Fighter Aircraft ❙ 5 Power Projection in an Antiaccess Environment Lt Col Robert D. Davis, USAF Remotely Piloted Aircraft and War in the Public Relations Domain ❙ 29 Capt Joseph O. Chapa, USAF Have Adversary Missiles Become a Revolution in Military Affairs? ❙ 47 William F. Bell Leadership Development ❙ 71 A Senior Leader Case Study Maj Jason M. Newcomer, DBA, USAF Sandra L. Kolberg, PhD Jon M. Corey, PhD Ira C. Eaker Award Winners ❙ 91 92 ❙ Views Aviation Security Cooperation ❙ 92 Advancing Global Vigilance, Global Reach, and Global Power in a Dynamic World Mort Rolleston Lt Col Ric “Trimmy” Trimillos, USAF Tom Gill Theory, Implementation, and the Future of Airpower ❙ 118 Prof. Mark Clodfelter US Military Innovation ❙ 128 Fostering Creativity in a Culture of Compliance Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 135 ❙ Book Reviews The Soviet Biological Weapons Program: A History .............. 135 Milton Leitenberg and Raymond A. Zilinskas Reviewer: SSgt Justin N. Theriot, USAF NASA Historical Data Book, vol. 7, NASA Launch Systems, Space Transportation / Human Spaceflight, and Space Science, 1989–1998 .......................... 137 Judy A. Rumerman Reviewer: Maj Brent D. Ziarnick, USAFR The U.S. Nuclear Arsenal: A History of Weapons and Delivery Systems since 1945 . 138 Norman Polmar and Robert S. Norris Reviewer: Capt Travis W. Halleman, USAF Black Ops, Vietnam: The Operational History of MACVSOG .......... 141 Robert M. Gillespie Reviewer: Capt Hilario J. Esquivel III, USAF The Influence of Airpower upon History: Statesmanship, Diplomacy, and Foreign Policy since 1903 ............................... 144 Robin Higham and Mark Parillo, editors Reviewer: Jeffrey M. Shaw, PhD America’s Space Sentinels: The History of the DSP and SBIRS Satellite Systems ........................................... 146 Jeffrey T. Richelson Reviewer: Maj Joseph T. Page II, USAF In the Skies of France: A Chronicle of JG 2 “Richthofen,” vol. 1, 1934–1940.................................... 149 Erik Mombeeck and Jean-Louis Roba with Chris Gross Reviewer: Lt Col Daniel J. Simonsen, USAF, Retired Reviewing the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) ............. 151 Henry Sokolski, editor Reviewer: Maj Scott C. Martin, USAF September–October 2014 Air & Space Power Journal | 2 Editorial Advisors Allen G. Peck, Director, Air Force Research Institute Lt Gen Bradley C. Hosmer, USAF, Retired Prof. Thomas B. Grassey, US Naval Academy Lt Col Dave Mets, PhD, USAF, Retired, School of Advanced Air and Space Studies (professor emeritus) Reviewers Dr. Christian F. Anrig Col John Jogerst, USAF, Retired Swiss Air Force Navarre, Florida Dr. Bruce Bechtol Col Wray Johnson, USAF, Retired Angelo State University School of Advanced Warfighting Marine Corps University Dr. Kendall K. Brown NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Mr. Charles Tustin Kamps USAF Air Command and Staff College Col Steven E. Cahanin Director of Technologies and Information Dr. Tom Keaney Air Force Personnel Center Johns Hopkins University Dr. Norman C. Capshaw Col Merrick E. Krause, USAF, Retired Military Sealift Command Department of Homeland Security Washington Navy Yard, DC Col Chris J. Krisinger, USAF, Retired Dr. Stephen D. Chiabotti Burke, Virginia USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Dr. Charles Krupnick Dr. Mark Clodfelter Troy University National War College Dr. Benjamin S. Lambeth Dr. Christopher T. Colliver Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio Dr. Richard I. Lester Dr. Charles Costanzo Eaker Center for Professional Development USAF Air Command and Staff College Dr. Adam Lowther Col Dennis M. Drew, USAF, Retired Air Force Research Institute USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Mr. Brent Marley (professor emeritus) Huntsville, Alabama Maj Gen Charles J. Dunlap Jr., USAF, Retired Mr. Rémy M. Mauduit Duke University Air Force Research Institute Dr. James W. Forsyth Col Phillip S. Meilinger, USAF, Retired USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies West Chicago, Illinois Lt Col Derrill T. Goldizen, PhD, USAF, Retired Dr. Richard R. Muller Westport Point, Massachusetts USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Col Mike Guillot, USAF, Retired Col Robert Owen, USAF, Retired Editor, Strategic Studies Quarterly Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Air Force Research Institute Lt Col Brian S. Pinkston, USAF, MC, SFS Dr. Grant T. Hammond Civil Aerospace Medical Institute USAF Center for Strategy and Technology Dr. Steve Rothstein Dr. Dale L. Hayden Colorado Springs Science Center Project Air Force Research Institute Col John E. Shaw Col S. Clinton Hinote Peterson AFB, Colorado Military Fellow Dr. James Smith Council on Foreign Relations USAF Institute for National Security Studies Dr. Thomas Hughes Col Richard Szafranski, USAF, Retired USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies Isle of Palms, South Carolina Lt Col Jeffrey Hukill, USAF, Retired Lt Col Edward B. Tomme, PhD, USAF, Retired Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development CyberSpace Operations Consulting and Education Lt Col David A. Umphress, PhD, USAFR, Retired Lt Col J. P. Hunerwadel, USAF, Retired Auburn University Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development Col Mark E. Ware, USAF, Retired and Education Twenty-Fourth Air Force Dr. Mark P. Jelonek, Col, USAF, Retired Dr. Xiaoming Zhang Aerospace Corporation USAF Air War College September–October 2014 Air & Space Power Journal | 3 Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen Mark A. Welsh III Commander, Air Education and Training Command Gen Robin Rand Commander and President, Air University Lt Gen David S. Fadok http://www.af.mil Director, Air Force Research Institute Allen G. Peck Editor and Chief of Professional Journals Lt Col Michael S. Tate Managing Editor L. Tawanda Eaves Professional Staff Marvin W. Bassett, Contributing Editor http://www.aetc.randolph.af.mil Daniel M. Armstrong, Illustrator L. Susan Fair, Illustrator Vivian O’Neal, Prepress Production Manager Billy Barth, Electronic Publication Manager The Air and Space Power Journal (ISSN 1554-2505), Air Force Recurring Publication 10-1, published electroni- cally bimonthly, is the professional journal of the United States Air Force. It is designed to serve as an open fo- rum for the presentation and stimulation of innovative thinking on military doctrine, strategy, force structure, http://www.au.af.mil readiness, and other matters of national defense. The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Com- Air and Space Power Journal mand, Air University, or other agencies or departments 155 N. Twining Street of the US government. Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6026 Articles in this edition may be reproduced in whole or in e-mail: [email protected] part without permission. If they are reproduced, the Air Visit Air and Space Power Journal online at and Space Power Journal requests a courtesy line. http://www.au.af.mil/au/afri/aspj/. Feature Forward Arming and Refueling Points for Fighter Aircraft Power Projection in an Antiaccess Environment Lt Col Robert D. Davis, USAF he United States depends upon effective power projection to advance its national interests abroad. A section of the Depart- ment of Defense’s strategic guidance for 2012 describes one of Tthe primary missions of the US armed forces as “Project[ing] Power De- spite Anti-Access/Area Denial Challenges.”1 The US Air Force plays a central role in power projection by providing air and space superiority; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR); rapid global mo- Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carry- ing the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If it is reproduced, theAir and Space Power Journal requests a courtesy line. September–October 2014 Air & Space Power Journal | 5 Feature Davis Forward Arming and Refueling Points for Fighter Aircraft bility; global strike; and command and control.2 The US military faces significant challenges to its power projection capabilities, particularly in the Western Pacific theater of operations (WPTO). The People’s Re- public of China has invested substantial resources in the moderniza- tion of its military forces and continues to expand its antiaccess/area- denial (A2/AD) capabilities, largely designed to prevent opposing forces from gaining access to the WPTO.3 Consequently, as the Air Force attempts to solve today’s A2/AD problems, it should first reduce the vulnerabilities of forward-deployed forces to A2 threats, thereby al- lowing them to project force into a contested theater. The rapid move- ment and employment of fighter aircraft by means of mobile forward arming and refueling points (FARP) support this priority. Fighter FARP, an innovative concept, combines sortie-generation ca- pabilities and mobility support to enable more expeditionary and dis- persed operations. It uses existing airfields throughout an area of re- sponsibility to increase the range and tempo of fighter operations. Fighter FARP includes rearming, refueling, and swapping pilots with- out the use of airfield infrastructure—usually in 90 to 120 minutes. Benefits include
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No
    MILITARY AVIATION REVIEW FEBRUARY 2012 ISSUE No. 291 EDITORIAL TEAM COORDINATING EDITOR - BRIAN PICKERING WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL”[email protected]” BRITISH REVIEW - GRAEME PICKERING 15 ASH GROVE, BOURNE, LINCS PE10 9SG TEL NO. 01778 421788 EMail "[email protected]" FOREIGN FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (see Co-ordinating Editor above for address details) US FORCES - BRIAN PICKERING (COORDINATING) (see above for address details) STATESIDE: MORAY PICKERING 18 MILLPIT FURLONG, LITTLEPORT, ELY, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, CB6 1HT E Mail “[email protected]” EUROPE: BRIAN PICKERING OUTSIDE USA: BRIAN PICKERING See address details above OUT OF SERVICE - ANDY MARDEN 6 CAISTOR DRIVE, BRACEBRIDGE HEATH, LINCOLN LN4 2TA E-MAIL "[email protected]" MEMBERSHIP/DISTRIBUTION - BRIAN PICKERING MAP, WESTFIELD LODGE, ASLACKBY, SLEAFORD, LINCS NG34 0HG TEL NO. 01778 440760 E-MAIL.”[email protected]” ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION (Jan-Dec 2012) UK £40 EUROPE £48 ELSEWHERE £50 @MAR £20 (EMail/Internet Only) MAR PDF £20 (EMail/Internet Only) Cheques payable to “MAP” - ALL CARDS ACCEPTED - Subscribe via “www.mar.co.uk” ABBREVIATIONS USED * OVERSHOOT f/n FIRST NOTED l/n LAST NOTED n/n NOT NOTED u/m UNMARKED w/o WRITTEN OFF wfu WITHDRAWN FROM USE n/s NIGHTSTOPPED INFORMATION MAY BE REPRODUCED FROM “MAR” WITH DUE CREDIT EDITORIAL - Welcome to the February edition of MAR! This issue sees the United Kingdom 2012 Review from Graeme - a month later than usual due to his work commitments. Because of this the issue is somewhat truncated in the Foreign Section department, but we should catch up with the March issue.
    [Show full text]
  • 81St FIGHTER SQUADRON
    81st FIGHTER SQUADRON MISSION LINEAGE 81st Pursuit Squadron (Interceptor) constituted, 6 Jan 1942 Activated, 15 Jan 1942 Redesignated 81st Fighter Squadron, 15 May 1942 Redesignated 81st Fighter Squadron (Special), 28 May 1942 Redesignated 81st Fighter Squadron (Single-Engine), 21 Jan 1944 Redesignated 81st Fighter Squadron, Single-Engine, 28 Feb 1944 Inactivated, 7 Nov 1945 Redesignated 81st Fighter Squadron (All-Weather), 13 May 1947 Activated in the Reserve, 12 Jul 1947 Redesignated 81st Fighter Squadron, Jet, 20 Jun 1949 Redesignated 81st Fighter Interceptor Squadron, 1 Mar 1950 Ordered to active service, 1 Jun 1951 Inactivated, 2 Jun 1951 Redesignated 81st Fighter-Bomber Squadron, 15 Nov 1952 Activated, 1 Jan 1953 Redesignated 81st Tactical Fighter Squadron, 8 Jul 1958 Redesignated 81st Fighter Squadron, 1 Oct 1991 STATIONS Key Field, MS, 15 Jan 1942 Orlando AB, FL, 22 Mar 1942 Cross City AAFld, FL, 18 Jun 1943 Orlando AB, FL, 1 Feb-13 Mar 1944 Lymington, England, 5 Apr 1944 Carentan, France, 25 Jun 1944 Meautis, France, 16 Aug 1944 Orly, France, 5 Sep 1944 Laon, France, 15 Sep 1944 Lyons/Bron, France, 29 Sep 1944 Toul/Ochey, France, 3 Nov 1944 Giebelstadt, Germany, 20 Apr 1945 Mannheim, Germany, 21 May-c. 23 Jun 1945 La Junta AAFld, CO, 6 Aug-7 Nov 1945 McChord Field, WA, 12 Jul 1947 Otis AFB, MA, 20 Jun 1949-2 Jun 1951 Clovis AFB, NM, 1 Jan-22 Jul 1953 Hahn AB, Germany, 10 Aug 1953 Toul/Rosieres AB, France, 10 Jul 1956 Hahn AB, Germany, 10 Dec 1959 Zweibrucken AB, Germany, 15 Jun 1971 Spangdahlem AB, Germany, 15 Jan 1973 ASSIGNMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetric Advantage: Air Advising in a Time of Strategic Competition
    AIR UNIVERSITY LEMAY CENTER FOR DOCTRINE DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION Asymmetric Advantage: Air Advising in a Time of Strategic Competition Michael M. Trimble Major, USAF LeMay Paper No. 5 Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Air University Anthony J. Cotton, Lieutenant General, Commander and President LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Brad Sullivan, Major General, Commandant and Dean Project Editor Maranda M. Gilmore Cover Art, Book Design, and Illustrations Daniel Armstrong Composition and Prepress Production Maranda Gilmore Written Spring 2018 and published by Air University Press in August 2019 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the organizations with which they are associated or the views of AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS the Air University Press, LeMay Center, Air University, United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Director and Publisher This publication is cleared for public release and Lt Col Darin Gregg unlimited distribution. Air University Press 600 Chennault Circle, Bldg 1405 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6010 https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress/ This LeMay Paper and other Air University Press publications are available electronically at Facebook: the AU Press website: https://www.airuniversity. https://www.facebook.com/AirUnivPress af.edu/AUPress. and Twitter: https://twitter.com/aupress Air University Press The LeMay Papers The LeMay Papers and other scholarly works published by Air University Press provide independent analysis and constructive discussion on issues important to Air Force commanders, staffs, and other decision makers. Each paper can also be a valuable tool for defining further research.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuskegee Airmen
    March 2016/$10 Tuskegee Airmen Lessons of the F-22 High-Altitude ISR at Risk Horner on the Gulf War March 2016, Vol. 99, No. 3 28 16 42 FEATURES 4 Editorial: Following the Money to 42 High-Altitude ISR at Risk Europe By Aaron M. U. Church To deter Russia, the US will dramati- The future of the U-2 and Global cally increase its forward presence Hawk missions are up in the air. in Europe. 47 Hypersonic Weapons Come of Age 16 Critical Ingredient in Short Supply By Mark J. Lewis By John A. Tirpak Will the US—or some other nation— USAF’s biggest problem with the be first to field these game-chang- F-22? There aren’t enough to go ing weapons? around. 52 Lifesavers Along the Trail 22 Horner’s Gulf War By Brian W. Everstine By Rebecca Grant Eric Roberts and Ronald Brodeur The air commander calls Desert Storm have now received Silver Stars they a hard-fought win for airpower. earned 46 years ago, for heroism in Vietnam. 28 Toward a Total Force By Jennifer Hlad 56 DOD Photochart The integration seen on deployment Compiled by Chequita Wood still isn’t natural at home station. DOD’s top leadership in Obama’s second-term Administration. About the cover: A 1943 poster that 34 Red Tails served as a war bonds ad and a symbol of Photos from USAF, the Air Force 60 All Eyes on Khe Sanh pride for the Tuskegee Airmen. See “Red Historical Research Agency, and Toni By John T.
    [Show full text]
  • SMA Future of Global Competition and Conflict Panel Discussion (Part 3 of 3)
    SMA Future of Global Competition and Conflict Panel Discussion (Part 3 of 3) How the US, Its Allies, and Its Partner Nations Should Manage the Global Challenges Presented by China Booklet 20 February 2020 1330-1500 ET Dial (866) 712-4038; Passcode 37250264# Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment (SMA) provides planning support to Commands with complex operational imperatives requiring multi-agency, multi-disciplinary solutions that are NOT within core Service/Agency competency. Solutions and participants are sought across USG and beyond. SMA is accepted and synchronized by Joint Staff/J-39 DDGO and executed by ASD (EC&P). Agenda Panel Description: This panel discussion is part three of a three-part series, focused on the SMA white paper, entitled “Chinese Strategic Intentions: A Deep Dive into China’s Worldwide Activities.” This third part will focus on how the US, its allies, and its partner nations should manage the challenges presented by China globally. Speakers: The speakers for this discussion will include: • Dr. Joseph G. D. Babb (US Army Command and General Staff College)- participant and moderator • Mr. Dean Cheng (Heritage Foundation) • Mr. Michael Mazarr (RAND) • Dr. Robert Spalding III, Brig Gen, USAF (Ret.) • Lt. Col. Christopher D. Forrest (US Air Force HQ AF/A3K (CHECKMATE)) Agenda: The following are brief descriptions of what each panelist will discuss during their presentation: • Dr. Joseph G. D. Babb- Opening Remarks o Dr. Babb will provide a series of opening remarks, based on his white paper preface. He will also serve as the moderator of this discussion. • Mr. Dean Cheng- “Chinese Views of Information and Implications for the United States” o When it comes to Chinese activities in the information domain, much of the public’s attention has been focused on its information extraction activities.
    [Show full text]
  • USA:S Militära Närvaro I Europa Fram Till 2020
    Denna studie syftar till att analysera vilka övergripande militära förmågor Winnerstig & Mike Lindvall Fredrik 2020 till fram närvaro i Europa militära - USA:s solidaritet Väpnad USA har tillgängliga i Europa och vilka förändringar av dessa som kan förutses under de närmaste åren. Idag (2017) har USA tillgång till ett framgrupperat strategiskt högkvarter (US EUCOM) och en militär personalstyrka om totalt ca 63 000 soldater som är permanent baserad i Europa. Vad gäller markstridskrafter finns tre brigadstridsgrupper i Europa på kon- tinenten. USA disponerar stora träningsanläggningar för markstrid och har påbörjat förhandslagring av materiel för ytterligare två tunga brigader med stödresurser i Europa. Vad gäller flygstridskrafter har USA mer än 150 kvalificerade stridsflygplan baserade i Europa. Därutöver finns också strategiska och operativa/tak- tiska förmågor som lufttankningsplan och luftburna kärnvapen. Vad gäller marinstridskrafter har den amerikanska 6.e flottan sitt hög- kvarter i Neapel (Italien), och bland de i Medelhavet baserade fartygen finns ett stort ledningsfartyg och fyra jagare med missilförsvarskapacitet. Marinkårens närvaro har förstärkts. Vidare har USA en viss specialförbandsförmåga i Europa, och håller på att bygga upp ett kvalificerat missilförsvarssystem i bl. a. Polen och Rumänien. De planerade förändringarna i närtid är störst avseende markstridskrafter. Sammanlagt kommer USA i slutet av 2017 att ha motsvarande en förstärkt division på plats i Europa. Detta innebär nästan en tredubbling av antalet Väpnad solidaritet manöverbataljoner sedan 2012. Den amerikanska förmågan att genom- föra försvarsoperationer i svenskt närområde har därmed ökat markant de senaste åren. USA:s militära närvaro i Europa fram till 2020 Den viktigaste orsaken till denna ökade ambition är geopolitisk: det ryska kriget mot Ukraina 2014 och Rysslands alltmer aggressiva politik gentemot sina grannländer.
    [Show full text]
  • 81St Fighter Squadron Farewell
    81ST FIGHTER SQUADRON FAREWELL Right: Capt Gregory Ulrich, an 81st Fighter Squadron pilot from Fairfield, California, runs through a celebratory stream of water after the last A-10 tactical sortie at Spangdahlem on May 14. US Air Force/Airman 1st Class Gustavo Castillo Below right: A-10C 82-0647, fitted with long- range ferry tanks, taxies out on May 17 as the final four Warthogs leave Spangdahlem for the last time. Joris van Boven 70 #304 JULY 2013 www.airforcesmonthly.com WarthogsSpangdahlem – a future? The of!cial word on Spangdahlem’s future is that Extinct in Europe the base is going to stay open. The F-16s of the 480th FS remain and the base is also home of the Hans Drost and Dick Wels report 606th Air Control Squadron – the ‘Inspectors of from Spangdahlem Air Base in the Skies’ – which provides deployable theatre Germany as the last USAF A-10s battle management. leave Europe S IF mother nature herself was depressed, the Alast tactical sortie of Fairchild Republic A-10C Thunderbolt IIs of the 81st Fighter Squadron (FS) ‘Panthers’ on May 14 flew under a dark and threaten- ing sky. It was farewell to both the Warthog, as the A-10 is affectionately known, and the Panthers almost 70 years after the unit’s first deployment to Europe. Panthers in Europe Two years after activation in the United States, the 81st FS arrived in England during 1944 with brand-new Republic P-47 Thunderbolt fighters. During the last year of the Second World War, the Panthers flew hundreds of fighter escort, close air support (CAS) and interdic- www.airforcesdaily.com #304 JULY 2013 71 81ST FIGHTER SQUADRON FAREWELL tion missions from numerous forward landing bases in Europe while covering the Allied advance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Air Force in the Balkans
    USAF has a major role as NATO's implementation force attempts to sustain a fragile peace. The Air Force in the ince 1991, when Yugoslavia Balkans Sbegan to tear itself apart, international organizations have struggled to halt the violence. The UN and NATO have mounted various operations, both diplomatic and military, aiming to bring peace in Europe's deadliest conflict since 1945. The latest of these— Operation Joint Endeavor—began after Serbs, Croats, and Muslims signed a peace accord in Dayton, Ohio, on November 21,1995. IFOR's 60,000 troops (20,000 Americans) have been put in place to ensure the fighting does not flare up again. The Air Force delivers NATO's forces to Bosnia-Hercegovina and protects them once they are in place. This F-16C from the 555th Fighter Squadron, Aviano AB, Italy, is loaded with AIM-9 and AIM-120 missiles and has been fitted with an electronic countermeasures pod to help outwit the SAM threat. Such aircraft on patrol have kept the skies clear of hostile aircraft. The First Wave of the Balkan Airlift illtr (December 4, 1995—January 18, 1996) lir Aircraft Type Missions Flown Passengers Carried Cargo Hauled (tons) Fuel Off-Loaded (tons) C-5 132 2,351 4,795 C-17 367 3,166 9,250 C-130 490 445 1,542 C-141 348 2,392 4,085 KC-10 11 114 67 KC-135 159 25 41 4,769 (combined) GRAF 28 2,440 1,011 Totals 1,535 10,933 20,791 4,769 In the early going, Air Mobility Command's lifters and tankers (as well as some C- 130s from Air Combat Command and US Air Forces in Europe) provided significant transportation support for Operation Joint Endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcomer's Guide Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany
    NEWCOMER'S GUIDE SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, GERMANY July 2021 WELCOME TO SABER NATION 52nd Fighter Wing History ......................................................................................................................................... 2 About Spangdahlem ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Before You Arrive............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Upon Arrival ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Driving in Germany ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Finding a Home ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 Utilities & Services .......................................................................................................................................................15 Additional Information .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Helpful References ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-03-505 Military Readiness
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority GAO Members, Subcommittees on Total Force and Readiness, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives May 2003 MILITARY READINESS Lingering Training and Equipment Issues Hamper Air Support of Ground Forces GAO-03-505 May 2003 MILITARY READINESS Lingering Training and Equipment Issues Highlights of GAO-03-505, a report to the Hamper Air Support of Ground Forces Ranking Minority Members of the Subcommittees on Total Force and Readiness, House Committee on Armed Services Recent operations in Afghanistan The Department of Defense has had limited success in overcoming the demonstrated the dangers of barriers that prevent troops from receiving the realistic, standardized close providing air support close to air support training necessary to prepare them for joint operations. This is troops on the ground. Such close the result of four interrelated factors: (1) ground and air forces have limited air support requires timely, well- opportunities to train together in a joint environment; (2) home station practiced procedures and communication between ground training is often restricted and thus does not always provide realistic training and air elements. While most close to prepare troops to perform the mission; (3) the services use different air support operations in training standards and certification requirements for personnel responsible Afghanistan were successful, for coordinating close air support; and (4) within the individual services, “friendly fire” incidents have joint close air support training is often a lower priority than other missions. resulted from mistakes made while While the department recognizes the need to improve the training for the conducting the mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal
    September–October 2014 Volume 28, No. 5 AFRP 10-1 Features Forward Arming and Refueling Points for Fighter Aircraft ❙ 5 Power Projection in an Antiaccess Environment Lt Col Robert D. Davis, USAF Remotely Piloted Aircraft and War in the Public Relations Domain ❙ 29 Capt Joseph O. Chapa, USAF Have Adversary Missiles Become a Revolution in Military Affairs? ❙ 47 William F. Bell Leadership Development ❙ 71 A Senior Leader Case Study Maj Jason M. Newcomer, DBA, USAF Sandra L. Kolberg, PhD Jon M. Corey, PhD Ira C. Eaker Award Winners ❙ 91 92 ❙ Views Aviation Security Cooperation ❙ 92 Advancing Global Vigilance, Global Reach, and Global Power in a Dynamic World Mort Rolleston Lt Col Ric “Trimmy” Trimillos, USAF Tom Gill Theory, Implementation, and the Future of Airpower ❙ 118 Prof. Mark Clodfelter US Military Innovation ❙ 128 Fostering Creativity in a Culture of Compliance Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 135 ❙ Book Reviews The Soviet Biological Weapons Program: A History .............. 135 Milton Leitenberg and Raymond A. Zilinskas Reviewer: SSgt Justin N. Theriot, USAF NASA Historical Data Book, vol. 7, NASA Launch Systems, Space Transportation / Human Spaceflight, and Space Science, 1989–1998 .......................... 137 Judy A. Rumerman Reviewer: Maj Brent D. Ziarnick, USAFR The U.S. Nuclear Arsenal: A History of Weapons and Delivery Systems since 1945 . 138 Norman Polmar and Robert S. Norris Reviewer: Capt Travis W. Halleman, USAF Black Ops, Vietnam: The Operational History of MACVSOG .......... 141 Robert M. Gillespie Reviewer: Capt Hilario J. Esquivel III, USAF The Influence of Airpower upon History: Statesmanship, Diplomacy, and Foreign Policy since 1903 ............................... 144 Robin Higham and Mark Parillo, editors Reviewer: Jeffrey M.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-03-505 Military Readiness
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority GAO Members, Subcommittees on Total Force and Readiness, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives May 2003 MILITARY READINESS Lingering Training and Equipment Issues Hamper Air Support of Ground Forces GAO-03-505 May 2003 MILITARY READINESS Lingering Training and Equipment Issues Highlights of GAO-03-505, a report to the Hamper Air Support of Ground Forces Ranking Minority Members of the Subcommittees on Total Force and Readiness, House Committee on Armed Services Recent operations in Afghanistan The Department of Defense has had limited success in overcoming the demonstrated the dangers of barriers that prevent troops from receiving the realistic, standardized close providing air support close to air support training necessary to prepare them for joint operations. This is troops on the ground. Such close the result of four interrelated factors: (1) ground and air forces have limited air support requires timely, well- opportunities to train together in a joint environment; (2) home station practiced procedures and communication between ground training is often restricted and thus does not always provide realistic training and air elements. While most close to prepare troops to perform the mission; (3) the services use different air support operations in training standards and certification requirements for personnel responsible Afghanistan were successful, for coordinating close air support; and (4) within the individual services, “friendly fire” incidents have joint close air support training is often a lower priority than other missions. resulted from mistakes made while While the department recognizes the need to improve the training for the conducting the mission.
    [Show full text]