DOCSLIB.ORG

Performance Analysis of Disk Mirroring Techniques Taysir Abdalla Florida International University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Performance Analysis of Disk Mirroring Techniques Taysir Abdalla Florida International University Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-28-1994 Performance analysis of disk mirroring techniques Taysir Abdalla Florida International University DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI13101501 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Abdalla, Taysir, "Performance analysis of disk mirroring techniques" (1994). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1061. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1061 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF DISK MIRRORING TECHNIQUES A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPUTER SCIENCE By Taysir Abdalla 1994 To: Arthur W. Herriott College of Arts and Sciences This thesis, written by Taysir Abdalla, and entitled Performance Analysis of Disk Mirroring Techniques, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. Dawn Holmes Ra'mund Ege Nagarajan Prabhakaran Cyril Org, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 28, 1994 The thesis of Taysir Abdalla is approved. Dean Arthur W. Herriott Colge of Arts and Sciences Dr. Richard L. Campb >l Dean of Graduate Studies Florida International University, 1994 ii ©COPYRIGHT 1994 by Taysir Abdalla All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisor, Dr. Orji, for his continuos support and encouragement. I also want to thank the members of my committee - Raimund Ege, Nagarajan Prabhakaran and Dawn Holmes. iv ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Performance Analysis of Disk Mirroring Techniques By Taysir Abdalla Florida International University, 1994 Miami, Florida Professor Cyril Orji, Major Professor Unequaled improvements in processor and I/O speeds make many applications such as databases and operating systems to be increasingly I/O bound. Many schemes such as disk caching and disk mirroring have been proposed to address the problem. In this thesis we focus only on disk mirroring. In disk mirroring, a logical disk image is maintained on two physical disks allowing a single disk failure to be transparent to application programs. Although disk mirroring improves data availability and reliability, it has two major drawbacks. First, writes are expensive because both disks must be updated. Second, load balancing during failure mode operation is poor because all requests are serviced by the surviving disk. Distorted mirrors was proposed to address the write problem and interleaved declustering to address the load balancing problem. In this thesis we perform a comparative study of these two schemes under various operating modes. In addition we also study traditional mirroring to provide a common basis for comparison. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Pending I/O Crisis........................................................ 1 1.2 Proposed Solutions............................................................... 2 1.3 Mirroring Techniques .......................................................... 4 1.3.1 Traditional Mirroring ........................................... 4 1.3.2 Distorted Mirroring ............................................... 5 1.3.3 Interleaved Declustering ...................................... 7 1.4 Statement of the Problem.................................................... 8 1.5 R elated W ork ....................................................................... 9 1.6 Thesis O bjective.................................................................... 11 2. THE SIMULATOR 2.1 Simulation Model................................................................ 13 2.2 Rebuild Algorithms.............................................................. 16 2.2.1 Traditional Mirroring ............................................ 16 2.2.1 Distorted Mirroring ............................................... 17 2.2.1 Interleaved Declustering ....................................... 19 3. SIMULATION RESULTS 3.1 Performance Metrics ............................................................ 21 3.2 N orm al M ode........................................................................ 21 3.3 Degraded Mode.................................................................... 24 3.4 R ebuild M ode ....................................................................... 27 3.5 Other Read/Write Ratios..................................................... 38 4. CONCLUSION 4.1 C ontributions........................................................................ 43 4.2 Future Directions.................................................................. 44 LIST OF REFERENCES ......................................................................... .46 Vi LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE I Iterleaved Declustering: A cluster of 8 Disks ......................... 14 II Disk and W orkload Parameters................................................ 15 III Response and Rebuild Time Data at 200 I/Os Per Second (N o Redirection of Read)........................................................... 37 IV Response and Rebuild Time Data at 200 I/Os Per Second (With Redirection of Read)......................................................... 37 vii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1 Disk A rrays (RA ID )........................................................................................ 3 2 Traditional Mirroring (Mirror set = 2) ........................................................ 5 3 D istorted M irroring ...................................................................................... 6 4 Interleaved Declustering (Cluster size = 4)................................................. 8 5 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Normal Mode) .............................................................................................. 22 6 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (75% read) (N orm al M ode).............................................................................................. 22 7 Disk Utilization vs I/O Rate (75% read: Normal Mode)............................. 23 8 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Degraded Mode - All requests).................................................................... 24 9 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (75% read) (Degraded M ode - All requests).................................................................. 25 10 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Degraded Mode - Only requests to failed disk).......................................... 26 11 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (75% read) (Degraded Mode - Only requests to failed disk).......................................... 26 12 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Rebuild Mode - All requests - Block rebuild unit).................................... 27 13 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (75% read) (Rebuild Mode - All requests - Block rebuild unit).................................... 28 14 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Rebuild Mode - Only requests to failed disk - Block rebuild unit)............ 28 viii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1 D isk A rrays (RA ID )...................................................................................... 3 2 Traditional Mirroring (Mirror set = 2) .......................................................... 5 3 D istorted M irroring ...................................................................................... 6 4 Interleaved Declustering (Cluster size = 4)................................................. 8 5 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Normal Mode) ............................................................................................. 22 6 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (75% read) (Normal Mode) ............................................................................................. 22 7 Disk Utilization vs I/O Rate (75% read: Normal Mode)............................. 23 8 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Degraded Mode - All requests).................................................................... 24 9 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (75% read) (Degraded Mode - All requests).................................................................... 25 10 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Degraded Mode - Only requests to failed disk).......................................... 26 11 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (75% read) (Degraded Mode - Only requests to failed disk).......................................... 26 12 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Rebuild Mode - All requests - Block rebuild unit).................................... 27 13 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (75% read) (Rebuild Mode - All requests - Block rebuild unit).................................... 28 14 90th Percentile Read Response Time vs I/O Rate (50% read) (Rebuild Mode - Only requests to failed disk - Block rebuild unit)............ 28 viii LIST OF FIGURES (continued) FIGURE PAGE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Title Title: Subtitle March 2007
    sub title The Title Title: Subtitle March 2007 Copyright c 2006-2007 BSD Certification Group, Inc. Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this documentation for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. THE DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS DOCUMENTATION INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CON- SEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEG- LIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS DOCUMENTATION. NetBSD and pkgsrc are registered trademarks of the NetBSD Foundation, Inc. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of the FreeBSD Foundation. Contents Introduction vii 1 Installing and Upgrading the OS and Software 1 1.1 Recognize the installation program used by each operating system . 2 1.2 Recognize which commands are available for upgrading the operating system 6 1.3 Understand the difference between a pre-compiled binary and compiling from source . 8 1.4 Understand when it is preferable to install a pre-compiled binary and how to doso ...................................... 9 1.5 Recognize the available methods for compiling a customized binary . 10 1.6 Determine what software is installed on a system . 11 1.7 Determine which software requires upgrading . 12 1.8 Upgrade installed software . 12 1.9 Determine which software have outstanding security advisories .
    [Show full text]
  • Disk Array Data Organizations and RAID
    Guest Lecture for 15-440 Disk Array Data Organizations and RAID October 2010, Greg Ganger © 1 Plan for today Why have multiple disks? Storage capacity, performance capacity, reliability Load distribution problem and approaches disk striping Fault tolerance replication parity-based protection “RAID” and the Disk Array Matrix Rebuild October 2010, Greg Ganger © 2 Why multi-disk systems? A single storage device may not provide enough storage capacity, performance capacity, reliability So, what is the simplest arrangement? October 2010, Greg Ganger © 3 Just a bunch of disks (JBOD) A0 B0 C0 D0 A1 B1 C1 D1 A2 B2 C2 D2 A3 B3 C3 D3 Yes, it’s a goofy name industry really does sell “JBOD enclosures” October 2010, Greg Ganger © 4 Disk Subsystem Load Balancing I/O requests are almost never evenly distributed Some data is requested more than other data Depends on the apps, usage, time, … October 2010, Greg Ganger © 5 Disk Subsystem Load Balancing I/O requests are almost never evenly distributed Some data is requested more than other data Depends on the apps, usage, time, … What is the right data-to-disk assignment policy? Common approach: Fixed data placement Your data is on disk X, period! For good reasons too: you bought it or you’re paying more … Fancy: Dynamic data placement If some of your files are accessed a lot, the admin (or even system) may separate the “hot” files across multiple disks In this scenario, entire files systems (or even files) are manually moved by the system admin to specific disks October 2010, Greg
    [Show full text]
  • Identify Storage Technologies and Understand RAID
    LESSON 4.1_4.2 98-365 Windows Server Administration Fundamentals IdentifyIdentify StorageStorage TechnologiesTechnologies andand UnderstandUnderstand RAIDRAID LESSON 4.1_4.2 98-365 Windows Server Administration Fundamentals Lesson Overview In this lesson, you will learn: Local storage options Network storage options Redundant Array of Independent Disk (RAID) options LESSON 4.1_4.2 98-365 Windows Server Administration Fundamentals Anticipatory Set List three different RAID configurations. Which of these three bus types has the fastest transfer speed? o Parallel ATA (PATA) o Serial ATA (SATA) o USB 2.0 LESSON 4.1_4.2 98-365 Windows Server Administration Fundamentals Local Storage Options Local storage options can range from a simple single disk to a Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID). Local storage options can be broken down into bus types: o Serial Advanced Technology Attachment (SATA) o Integrated Drive Electronics (IDE, now called Parallel ATA or PATA) o Small Computer System Interface (SCSI) o Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) LESSON 4.1_4.2 98-365 Windows Server Administration Fundamentals Local Storage Options SATA drives have taken the place of the tradition PATA drives. SATA have several advantages over PATA: o Reduced cable bulk and cost o Faster and more efficient data transfer o Hot-swapping technology LESSON 4.1_4.2 98-365 Windows Server Administration Fundamentals Local Storage Options (continued) SAS drives have taken the place of the traditional SCSI and Ultra SCSI drives in server class machines. SAS have several
    [Show full text]
  • • RAID, an Acronym for Redundant Array of Independent Disks Was Invented to Address Problems of Disk Reliability, Cost, and Performance
    RAID • RAID, an acronym for Redundant Array of Independent Disks was invented to address problems of disk reliability, cost, and performance. • In RAID, data is stored across many disks, with extra disks added to the array to provide error correction (redundancy). • The inventors of RAID, David Patterson, Garth Gibson, and Randy Katz, provided a RAID taxonomy that has persisted for a quarter of a century, despite many efforts to redefine it. 1 RAID 0: Striped Disk Array • RAID Level 0 is also known as drive spanning – Data is written in blocks across the entire array . 2 RAID 0 • Recommended Uses: – Video/image production/edition – Any app requiring high bandwidth – Good for non-critical storage of data that needs to be accessed at high speed • Good performance on reads and writes • Simple design, easy to implement • No fault tolerance (no redundancy) • Not reliable 3 RAID 1: Mirroring • RAID Level 1, also known as disk mirroring , provides 100% redundancy, and good performance. – Two matched sets of disks contain the same data. 4 RAID 1 • Recommended Uses: – Accounting, payroll, financial – Any app requiring high reliability (mission critical storage) • For best performance, controller should be able to do concurrent reads/writes per mirrored pair • Very simple technology • Storage capacity cut in half • S/W solutions often do not allow “hot swap” • High disk overhead, high cost 5 RAID 2: Bit-level Hamming Code ECC Parity • A RAID Level 2 configuration consists of a set of data drives, and a set of Hamming code drives. – Hamming code drives provide error correction for the data drives.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectures and Algorithms for On-Line Failure Recovery in Redundant Disk Arrays
    Architectures and Algorithms for On-Line Failure Recovery in Redundant Disk Arrays Draft copy submitted to the Journal of Distributed and Parallel Databases. A revised copy is published in this journal, vol. 2 no. 3, July 1994.. Mark Holland Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Ave. Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 (412) 268-5237 [email protected] Garth A. Gibson School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Ave. Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 (412) 268-5890 [email protected] Daniel P. Siewiorek School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Ave. Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 (412) 268-2570 [email protected] Architectures and Algorithms for On-Line Failure Recovery In Redundant Disk Arrays1 Abstract The performance of traditional RAID Level 5 arrays is, for many applications, unacceptably poor while one of its constituent disks is non-functional. This paper describes and evaluates mechanisms by which this disk array failure-recovery performance can be improved. The two key issues addressed are the data layout, the mapping by which data and parity blocks are assigned to physical disk blocks in an array, and the reconstruction algorithm, which is the technique used to recover data that is lost when a component disk fails. The data layout techniques this paper investigates are variations on the declustered parity organiza- tion, a derivative of RAID Level 5 that allows a system to trade some of its data capacity for improved failure-recovery performance. Parity declustering improves the failure-mode performance of an array significantly, and a parity-declustered architecture is preferable to an equivalent-size multiple-group RAID Level 5 organization in environments where failure-recovery performance is important.
    [Show full text]
  • Techsmart Representatives
    Wave TechSmart representatives RAID BASICS ARE YOUR SECURITY SOLUTIONS FAULT TOLERANT? Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) is a Enclosure: The "box" which contains the controller, storage technology used to improve the processing drives/drive trays and bays, power supplies, and fans is capability of storage systems. This technology is called an "enclosure." The enclosure includes various designed to provide reliability in disk array systems and controls, ports, and other features used to connect the to take advantage of the performance gains offered by RAID to a host for example. an array of mulple disks over single-disk storage. Wave RepresentaCves has experience with both high- RAID’s two primary underlying concepts are (1) that performance compuCng and enterprise storage, providing distribuCng data over mulple hard drives improves soluCons to large financial instuCons to research performance and (2) that using mulple drives properly laboratories. The security industry adopted superior allows for any one drive to fail without loss of data and compuCng and storage technologies aGer the transiCon without system downCme. In the event of a disk from analog systems to IP based networks. This failure, disk access will conCnue normally and the failure evoluCon has created robust and resilient systems that will be transparent to the host system. can handle high bandwidth from video surveillance soluCons to availability for access control and emergency Originally designed and implemented for SCSI drives, communicaCons. RAID principles have been applied to SATA and SAS drives in many video systems. Redundancy of any system, especially of components that have a lower tolerance in MTBF makes sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Systems : Cache, DRAM, Disk
    CHAPTER 24 Storage Subsystems Up to this point, the discussions in Part III of this with how multiple drives within a subsystem can be book have been on the disk drive as an individual organized together, cooperatively, for better reliabil- storage device and how it is directly connected to a ity and performance. This is discussed in Sections host system. This direct attach storage (DAS) para- 24.1–24.3. A second aspect deals with how a storage digm dates back to the early days of mainframe subsystem is connected to its clients and accessed. computing, when disk drives were located close to Some form of networking is usually involved. This is the CPU and cabled directly to the computer system discussed in Sections 24.4–24.6. A storage subsystem via some control circuits. This simple model of disk can be designed to have any organization and use any drive usage and confi guration remained unchanged of the connection methods discussed in this chapter. through the introduction of, fi rst, the mini computers Organization details are usually made transparent to and then the personal computers. Indeed, even today user applications by the storage subsystem presenting the majority of disk drives shipped in the industry are one or more virtual disk images, which logically look targeted for systems having such a confi guration. like disk drives to the users. This is easy to do because However, this simplistic view of the relationship logically a disk is no more than a drive ID and a logical between the disk drive and the host system does not address space associated with it.
    [Show full text]
  • I/O Workload Outsourcing for Boosting RAID Reconstruction Performance
    WorkOut: I/O Workload Outsourcing for Boosting RAID Reconstruction Performance Suzhen Wu1, Hong Jiang2, Dan Feng1∗, Lei Tian12, Bo Mao1 1Key Laboratory of Data Storage Systems, Ministry of Education of China 1School of Computer Science & Technology, Huazhong University of Science & Technology 2Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln ∗Corresponding author: [email protected] {suzhen66, maobo.hust}@gmail.com, {jiang, tian}@cse.unl.edu, [email protected] Abstract ing reconstruction without serving any I/O requests from User I/O intensity can significantly impact the perfor- user applications, and on-line reconstruction, when the mance of on-line RAID reconstruction due to contention RAID continues to service user I/O requests during re- for the shared disk bandwidth. Based on this observa- construction. tion, this paper proposes a novel scheme, called WorkOut Off-line reconstruction has the advantage that it’s (I/O Workload Outsourcing), to significantly boost RAID faster than on-line reconstruction, but it is not practical reconstruction performance. WorkOut effectively out- in environments with high availability requirements, as sources all write requests and popular read requests orig- the entire RAID set needs to be taken off-line during re- inally targeted at the degraded RAID set to a surrogate construction. RAID set during reconstruction. Our lightweight pro- On the other hand, on-line reconstruction allows fore- totype implementation of WorkOut and extensive trace- ground traffic to continue during reconstruction, but driven and benchmark-driven experiments demonstrate takes longer to complete than off-line reconstruction as that, compared with existing reconstruction approaches, the reconstruction process competes with the foreground WorkOut significantly speeds up both the total recon- workload for I/O bandwidth.
    [Show full text]
  • RAID — Begin with the Basics How Does RAID Work? RAID Increases Data Protection and Performance by What Is RAID? Duplicating And/Or Spreading Data Over Multiple Disks
    RAID — Begin With The Basics How Does RAID Work? RAID increases data protection and performance by What is RAID? duplicating and/or spreading data over multiple disks. DRIVE 1 RAID stands for Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. RAID is a method of logically treating Mirroring Mirroring & Striping several hard drives as one unit. It can offer fault tolerance and higher throughput levels than a Duplicates data from primary Mirrors data that is striped, spread single hard drive or group of independent hard drives. DRIVE 2 drive to secondary drive evenly across multiple disks Why Do We Need It? RAID provides real-time data recovery when a hard drive fails, increasing system uptime and DRIVE 1 DRIVE 1 DRIVE 3 availability while protecting against loss of data. Multiple drives working together also increase system performance. DRIVE 2 DRIVE 2 DRIVE 4 Levels of RAID DRIVE 1 DRIVE 3 RAID Level Description Minimum # of Drives Benefit RAID 0 Data striping (no data protection) 2 Highest performance DRIVE 2 DRIVE 4 RAID 1 Disk mirroring 2 Highest data protection RAID 1E Disk mirroring 3 Highest data protection for an odd number of disks RAID 5 Data striping with distributed parity 3 Best cost/performance balance for multi-drive environments RAID 5EE Data striping with distributed parity with 4 The cost/performance balance of RAID 5 without setting aside a dedicated hotspare disk hotspare integrated into the array RAID 6 Data striping with dual distributed parity 4 Highest fault tolerance with the ability to survive two disk failures RAID 10 Data
    [Show full text]
  • Which RAID Level Is Right for Me?
    STORAGE SOLUTIONS WHITE PAPER Which RAID Level is Right for Me? Contents Introduction.....................................................................................1 RAID 10 (Striped RAID 1 sets) .................................................3 RAID Level Descriptions..................................................................1 RAID 50 (Striped RAID 5 sets) .................................................4 RAID 0 (Striping).......................................................................1 RAID 60 (Striped RAID 6 sets) .................................................4 RAID 1 (Mirroring).....................................................................2 RAID Level Comparison ..................................................................5 RAID 1E (Striped Mirror)...........................................................2 About Adaptec RAID .......................................................................5 RAID 5 (Striping with parity) .....................................................2 RAID 5EE (Hot Space).....................................................................3 RAID 6 (Striping with dual parity).............................................3 Data is the most valuable asset of any business today. Lost data of users. This white paper intends to give an overview on the means lost business. Even if you backup regularly, you need a performance and availability of various RAID levels in general fail-safe way to ensure that your data is protected and can be and may not be accurate in all user
    [Show full text]
  • Software-RAID-HOWTO.Pdf
    Software-RAID-HOWTO Software-RAID-HOWTO Table of Contents The Software-RAID HOWTO...........................................................................................................................1 Jakob Østergaard [email protected] and Emilio Bueso [email protected] 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Why RAID?.........................................................................................................................................1 3. Devices.................................................................................................................................................1 4. Hardware issues...................................................................................................................................1 5. RAID setup..........................................................................................................................................1 6. Detecting, querying and testing...........................................................................................................2 7. Tweaking, tuning and troubleshooting................................................................................................2 8. Reconstruction.....................................................................................................................................2 9. Performance.........................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 : " Introduction "
    Chapter 1 : " Introduction " This chapter will introduce you to your new Disk Array's features and provide information on general RAID concept. 1-1 Introduction Features This section provides an overview of the features. For more detailed information, please refer to the technical specifications appendix at the end of this manual . Your Disk Array includes the following features : Easy Operation As everyone knows, conventional Disk Arrays are designed for experienced computer specialists. To solve complicated and time consuming operating procedures, we came up with a revolutionary idea : -- Innovative Plug And Play RAID -- As compared to a conventional Disk Array's long-winded setup procedures, your Disk Array can be ready to go after using the simple step by step built-in setup program. Ultra High performance Your Disk Array combines an extremely high speed microprocessor with the latest chip set, SCSI hardware technology, perfect firmware and an artistic design. The result is one of the fastest, most reliable Disk Array systems on the market. Supports virtually all popular operating systems ,platforms and network environments because it works independently from the O.S. Ultra 160 LVD SCSI channel interface to your Host computer, up to 160MB data transfer rate provides the processing and access power for you to handle complex and large files. Selective SCSI ID 0 ~ 14 , support with active termination. Tagged-command queuing : allows processing of up to 255 simultaneous data requests. Selective RAID levels 0, 1, 0+1, 3 or 5. Build-in 128MB cache memory, expandable up to 512MB. Serial communication port ( Terminal Port ) permits array controller operation through a standard VT100 terminal (or equivalent).
    [Show full text]