The Free School Movement As a Social Movement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Free School Movement As a Social Movement Abstract Title of Dissertation: AN ARCHIPELAGO OF THINKERS: THE FREE SCHOOL MOVEMENT AS A SOCIAL MOVEMENT Dani Biancolli, Doctor of Education, 2015 Dissertation directed by: Dr. Ethan Hutt College of Education, Department of Teaching and Learning, Policy and Leadership The Free School Movement of the 1960s was a short educational reform effort that grew out of the anti-establishment and anti-authoritarian ideas of the counterculture. This group of radical thinkers included individuals like Jonathan Kozol, George Dennison, and John Holt and built upon the rich history of education reform in the United States. This study investigates whether the framework created by sociologist Charles Tilly to study social movements can be applied to education reform efforts like the Free School Movement. The goal of the study is twofold. First, it is to determine whether the Free School Movement can be termed a social movement using Tilly’s framework and thus, if the framework can be used to create a common language for the study of educational reform efforts. Second, the study situates the Free School Movement within the larger stream of American educational history. Ultimately, the study concludes that the Free School Movement can be termed a social movement according to Tilly’s definition. In determining this, the study also shows that Tilly’s framework can, with a few modifications, be used to study education reform efforts and to provide a basis for comparison and analysis. In addition, the study is able to demonstrate that the Free School Movement wrestled with the same tensions common to many educational reform efforts in American history. While those who participated in the Free School Movement believed that they were attempting something new and different, this study shows that the Movement was part of a long struggle to determine if education should be viewed as a public or private good. AN ARCHIPELAGO OF THINKERS: THE FREE SCHOOL MOVEMENT AS A SOCIAL MOVEMENT by Dani Biancolli Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education 2015 Advisory Committee: Dr. Ethan Hutt, Chair Dr. Helene Cohen Dr. Thomas Davis Dr. Olivia Saracho Dr. Margaret McLaughlin ©Copyright by Dani Biancolli 2015 Dedication To my family, who supported me throughout this arduous process. Thank you for never doubting that I could do this. To Mom, research assistant extraordinaire, for her expertise as a photographer, her patience as a sounding board and her firmness as a taskmaster. Thank you for always being on my side. I would have never finished this without you. ii Table of Contents Chapter 1 ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Research Questions ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Significance of the Study ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Definition of Terms and Individuals ................................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 What was a Free School? ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 What were the roots of Free School ideas? ................................................................................................................. 15 How did the Free School Movement rise and fall? .................................................................................................. 22 Chapter 3 .................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Purpose of Study .................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Importance of the Study .................................................................................................................................................... 31 Conceptual Framework ...................................................................................................................................................... 33 Research Questions ............................................................................................................................................................. 42 Design of the Study ............................................................................................................................................................. 42 IRB, Human Subjects and Confidentiality .................................................................................................................. 49 Limitations of the Study .................................................................................................................................................... 49 Chapter 4 .................................................................................................................................................................... 51 Question 1 .............................................................................................................................................................................. 52 Question #2 ............................................................................................................................................................................ 59 Question #3 ............................................................................................................................................................................ 70 Chapter 5 .................................................................................................................................................................... 85 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................. 94 References ............................................................................................................................................................... 107 iii Chapter 1 Introduction In the United States, the 1960s was a decade of great upheaval and change. It was a decade when the traditions of the past were called into question and the youth of America began to experiment with new ideas. It was a decade that endured challenges to institutional structures such as the government and the military. And, it was also a decade that saw great changes in education. For example, public education began introducing curricular reforms such as “new math” and “new English” in an attempt to break from the traditions then under assault by those seeking change (Long, 1973, p. 3). Yet for some of the most ardent reformers, these changes were not enough. For these individuals, the belief that the American educational system was “based upon a paradigm that was largely consistent with behaviorist psychology and an assembly line view” made wholesale change a necessity (Wheatley, 2009, p. 32). In American Alternative Education: Ideals in Action, Claire Korn writes that “the upheavals in American society from the late 1960s to the mid-1970s, through the heated times of the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights movement, stirred antagonism towards authority and stimulated the growth of non- traditional schools” (Korn, 1991, p. 2). If the 1960s was a decade that changed America, then 1968 was a year that changed the nation, a year when tensions reached their zenithwith the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy, the shock of the Tet Offensive and the collapse of Lyndon Johnson’s dream of a second presidential term (Newmann, 2003, p. 90). It was also the year when sales of A.S. Neill’s Summerhill, a small book about an experimental school in England, reached one 1 million copies sold, and the Free School Movement1 was born (Newmann, 2003, p. 91). While Neill’s Summerhill would form one plank of the Free School Movement platform, his writings were joined by the works of Jonathan Kozol, Herb Kohl, Nat Hentoff, George Dennison, and John Holt. For these reformers, education was understood as “an inherently political process, involving helping students demystify the everyday world that they inhabit to reveal both the power relations and interests that structure it and the commonsense beliefs that support such
Recommended publications
  • 03-04 Dean's Report
    Dean’s Report 2003 - 2004 CONTENTS 2 Carter Named Alumna of the Year DEAN BOARD OF DIRECTORS 3 Anthony A. Tarr 2002-2005 Craig Borowski ‘00 Program on Law and State ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS James Gilday ‘86 Government Symposium Andrew R. Klein Amy E. Hamilton ‘89 ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR GRADUATE STUDIES Scott D. Yonover ‘89 4 Jeffrey W. Grove Fall Semester Lectures 2003-2006 ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR STUDENT SERVICES Page Gifford ‘75 AND ADMISSIONS Gilbert L. Holmes ‘99 5 Angela M. Espada Linda L. Meier ‘87 Inaugural Leibman Forum Hon. Margret G. Robb ‘78 ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR TECHNOLOGY Patrick J. Schauer ‘79 Thomas Allington 8 Donald L. Simkin ‘74 Kennedy Scholars Program ASSISTANT DEAN FOR EXTERNAL AFFAIRS Hon. G. Michael Witte ‘82 Jonna M. Kane MacDougall, ’86 2004-2007 9 DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT Hon. Cynthia Ayers ‘82 Scholarship and Award Recipients Carol Neary Richard N. Bell ‘75 James Hernandez ‘85 DIRECTOR OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Victor Ippoliti ‘99 16 AND PRO BONO PROGRAMS Tandra Johnson ‘98 Annual Report of Private Giving Shannon L. Williams John Maley ‘88 Tammy J. Meyer ‘89 DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE 17 Hon. Gary L. Miller ‘80 Jo-Ann B. Feltman Partners in Progress Mariana Richmond ‘91 Hon. Robert H. Staton ‘55 19 SCHOOL OF LAW ALUMNI ASSOCIATION Jerome Withered ‘80 John Holt 2004-2005 Sally F. Zweig ‘86 PRESIDENT 20 Robert W. Wright ’90 Dean’s Council VICE PRESIDENT Mary F. Panzi ’88 21 Law School Associates SECRETARY Nathan Feltman ’94 26 TREASURER Law Firm and Corporate Campaign Eric Riegner ’88 EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Robertson County No
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 10, 2002 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S SERVICES v. FLORENCE HOFFMEYER, ET AL. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Robertson County No. D-18308 Max Fagan, Judge No. M2002-00076-COA-R3-JV- Filed March 13, 2003 The natural parents of a seventeen year old girl appeal the action of the Juvenile Court of Robertson County terminating their parental rights based upon a finding of severe child abuse under Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113(g)(4). Because the appellate record is incomplete, we vacate the judgment and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Juvenile Court Vacated and Remanded WILLIAM B. CAIN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BEN H. CANTRELL, P.J., M.S., joined. PATRICIA J. COTTRELL, J., concurring. Mark Walker, Goodlettsville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Florence Hoffmeyer. Bryce C. Ruth, Jr., White House, Tennessee, for the appellant, Larry Hoffmeyer. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter and Elizabeth C. Driver, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee, Department of Children’s Services; In the Matter of: A.L.H., child under the age of 18 years. OPINION Larry and Florence Hoffmeyer, husband and wife, are parents of two children, Susan Hoffmeyer, now an adult, and A.H., born August 7, 1985. Following a hearing on November 5 and 10, 1999, upon a petition of the Department of Children’s Services for temporary custody of Susan Hoffmeyer and A.H., the Juvenile Court of Robertson County, on November 30, 1999, entered an Order providing: This cause came to be heard on the 5th and 10th days of November, 1999 before the Honorable Judge Max Fagan upon the petition of the Department of Children Services for temporary custody of SUSAN HOFFMEYER and [A.H.] (hereinafter referred to as ‘minor children’).
    [Show full text]
  • How Children Fail by John Holt, Penguin Education Foreword Most
    How Children Fail By John Holt, Penguin Education Foreword Most children in school fail. For a great many, this failure is avowed and absolute. Close to forty percent of those who begin high school, drop out before they finish. For college, the figure is one in three. Many others fail in fact if not in name. They complete their schooling only because we have agreed to push them up through the grades and out of the schools, whether they know anything or not. There are many more such children than we think. If we "raise our standards" much higher, as some would have us do, we will find out very soon just how many there are. Our classrooms will bulge with kids who can't pass the test to get into the next class. But there is a more important sense in which almost all children fail: Except for a handful, who may or may not be good students, they fail to develop more than a tiny part of the tremendous capacity for learning, understanding, and creating with which they were born and of which they made full use during, the first two or three years of their lives. Why do they fail? They fail because they are afraid, bored, and confused. They are afraid, above all else, of failing, of disappointing or displeasing the many anxious adults around them, whose limitless hopes and expectations for them hang over their heads like a cloud. They are bored because the things they are given and told to do in school are so trivial, so dull, and make such limited and narrow demands on the wide spectrum of their intelligence, capabilities, and talents.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchist Pedagogies: Collective Actions, Theories, and Critical Reflections on Education Edited by Robert H
    Anarchist Pedagogies: Collective Actions, Theories, and Critical Reflections on Education Edited by Robert H. Haworth Anarchist Pedagogies: Collective Actions, Theories, and Critical Reflections on Education Edited by Robert H. Haworth © 2012 PM Press All rights reserved. ISBN: 978–1–60486–484–7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2011927981 Cover: John Yates / www.stealworks.com Interior design by briandesign 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 PM Press PO Box 23912 Oakland, CA 94623 www.pmpress.org Printed in the USA on recycled paper, by the Employee Owners of Thomson-Shore in Dexter, Michigan. www.thomsonshore.com contents Introduction 1 Robert H. Haworth Section I Anarchism & Education: Learning from Historical Experimentations Dialogue 1 (On a desert island, between friends) 12 Alejandro de Acosta cHAPteR 1 Anarchism, the State, and the Role of Education 14 Justin Mueller chapteR 2 Updating the Anarchist Forecast for Social Justice in Our Compulsory Schools 32 David Gabbard ChapteR 3 Educate, Organize, Emancipate: The Work People’s College and The Industrial Workers of the World 47 Saku Pinta cHAPteR 4 From Deschooling to Unschooling: Rethinking Anarchopedagogy after Ivan Illich 69 Joseph Todd Section II Anarchist Pedagogies in the “Here and Now” Dialogue 2 (In a crowded place, between strangers) 88 Alejandro de Acosta cHAPteR 5 Street Medicine, Anarchism, and Ciencia Popular 90 Matthew Weinstein cHAPteR 6 Anarchist Pedagogy in Action: Paideia, Escuela Libre 107 Isabelle Fremeaux and John Jordan cHAPteR 7 Spaces of Learning: The Anarchist Free Skool 124 Jeffery Shantz cHAPteR 8 The Nottingham Free School: Notes Toward a Systemization of Praxis 145 Sara C.
    [Show full text]
  • Can They Coexist? …John Holt Water Issues for Beef Cattle Producers
    People and Agriculture - Can They Coexist? …John Holt Water Issues for Beef Cattle Producers …Roy Carriker Planning, Property Rights and Value Issues for Florida Landowners …Rodney Clouser Environmental Concerns for Agriculture …Billy Kempfer Environmental Issues of Concern to Florida Cattlemen …Carlton Layne Cattle in the Environment …Alto Adams, Jr. Animal Rights - An Issue for the Future …Farol Tomson Beef Health Management Prospects for the Nineties …Owen Rae Challenges and Opportunities in the Nineties …Bill Mies Foreign Beef Trade - Issues and Outlook …Tom Cook Sales Contracts for Calves …Jackie Bass Contracts and Marketing of Calves …Harvey Benschoter Sales Contracts for Calves …Dan Sumner The Effect of Backgrounding System and Cattle Type on Net Return …Tom Spreen Florida State Fair Youth Steer Futurity …Don Wakeman New Products - Successes and Failures …Jim Lamkey Impact of Beef Promotion …John Francis Ultrasound and Carcass Evaluation Program …Roger West Relationship of Muscling to Production Traits …Don Hargrove Keeping Beef Records on the Computer …Bob Sand Forage Challenges and Opportunities in the Nineties …Carol Chambliss Grazing Management of Improved Pastures …Lynn Sollenberger Round Bale Silage - A Forage Harvesting Alternative …Doug Bates Cultural and Fertilizer Practices for Bahiagrass Seed Production …Martin Adjei Experiences with Seed Production form Florida Forages …Kelsey Payne Aeschynomene Feed, Seed & Nitrogen …Wesley Williamson CATTLE IN THE ENVIRONMENT ALTO ADAMS, JR. ADAM RANCH FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA FLORIDA'S RANCHES PROVIDE AN IDEAL ENVIRONMENT FOR WILDLIFE AS WELL AS LIVESTOCK. CATTLEMEN WHO HAVE GROWN UP ON THE LAND HAVE LEARNED TO KEEP HAMMOCKS AND TIMBER AS PROTECTION FOR THEIR CATTLE, AND THEY REALIZE THAT BIRDS, GAME AND PREDATORS COMPLEMENT THE CATTLE RATHER THAN COMPETE.
    [Show full text]
  • Unschooling and Social Justice/Multicultural Education: (Un)Realized Potential Kristan Morrison Radford University, US
    Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives ISSN 2049-2162 Volume 7(2018), Issue 2 · pp. 97-117 Unschooling and Social Justice/Multicultural Education: (Un)Realized Potential Kristan Morrison Radford University, US. Abstract An online survey of unschooling families (student-directed form of homeschooling) sought to discover whether and how unschooled children experience a social justice curriculum (one that seeks equity between cultures, ethnicities, genders, classes, and sexualities). The 2016 survey asked about unschooled children’s relationships with/recognition of people different from themselves, their degree of critical analysis of systems and institutions in society which created, maintain, and perpetuate inequities, and whether they had opportunities to envision and work for a just and equitable society. The philosophical tenets of unschooling complicate this query, and are explored. Findings illustrate that unschooling’s educational philosophy of “curriculum-as- lived” (as opposed to “curriculum-as-plan”) (Aoki, 2004) has the potential (though not realized by all unschooling families) to provide a unique approach to social justice/multicultural education, allowing unschooled children to learn about minoritized cultures, systems that led to the minoritization, and the possibilities and pathways to a more equitable society. Keywords unschooling, multicultural education, social justice, student-directed learning, homeschooling Introduction Unschooling defined Student-directed learning in the home, termed unschooling (Farenga, 1999), is a form of education in which parents eschew a formal or standardized curriculum and instead allow their children curricular freedom. In unschooling, “the learner’s freedom and autonomy [is] limited as little as possible, ...learning always starts with the individual’s needs, goals, and desires, and not with any supposed body of knowledge or societal demands” (Miller, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • School Handbook
    School Handbook Last Updated July 7, 2020 Chagrinvalleyschool.org Preface This handbook is “required reading” for students and parents, but also for community members and anyone who is interested to learn about self-directed education and our school model. The first chapter is an introduction to self-directed education that comes from the Alliance for Self-Directed Education. The second chapter is a guide to all facets of Chagrin Valley School, including its history, school structures and how it operates. This is for transparency and to help everyone understand all the inner workings of the school. The third chapter describes the transition process for students and parents adjusting to self-directed learning. The last chapter is a long list of resources for further information about self-directed education. Table of Contents Chapter 1: What is Self Directed Education? The Four Educative Drives The Six Optimizing Conditions Why Choose Self-Directed Education? How Do People Practice SDE? The Agile Tree // The Self-Directed Model Chapter 2: Chagrin Valley School History School Overview Democratic Structure Preamble School Meeting Judiciary Committee Committees Info Station Off Campus Trips Enrollment Attendance What to Bring to School Parents Tuition Staff Frequently Asked Questions Permaculture Volunteering Community & Events School Board Mission & Vision Chagrin Valley School Handbook 1 Chapter 3: Deschooling What is Deschooling? Deschooling in Parents Deschooling in Students Chapter 4: Further Information & Resources Books Film & Video Podcasts & Radio Shows Research & Journals Websites, Blogs & News Social Media Pages & Groups Chagrin Valley School Handbook 2 Chapter 1: What is Self Directed Education? This first chapter is an introduction to self-directed education and comes from the Alliance of Self-Directed Education.
    [Show full text]
  • WDAF, KANSAS CITY, MO This Report Covers the Time Period September 1, 2003 – August 31, 2004 (Except Where Otherwise Specifically Noted)
    WDAF, KANSAS CITY, MO This report covers the time period September 1, 2003 – August 31, 2004 (except where otherwise specifically noted). Local Newscasts and Key Stories WDAF airs 49.0 hours of local news each week, at the following times: Monday – Friday, 5 a.m. – 9 a.m. Monday – Friday, 12 p.m. – 1 p.m. Monday – Friday, 5 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. Monday – Friday, 9 p.m. – 10:30 p.m. Saturday – Sunday, 7 a.m. – 9 a.m. Saturday – Sunday, 5 p.m. – 6 p.m. Saturday – Sunday, 9 p.m. – 10:30 p.m. Provided below is a brief summary of important local news issues that WDAF has covered recently within its local news broadcasts: * Local Government - WDAF provided coverage of Missouri's concealed gun law, and efforts by some Kansas City city council members to impose limitations. * Environment – Station covered efforts to begin a curbside recycling program in Kansas City. * Law Enforcement – Federal, state and local law enforcement agencies teamed up to prevent welfare fraud. * Economy – WDAF reported on efforts to deal with Kansas City's $24 million budget shortfall, which included a hiring freeze and potential furloughs and layoffs. * Education – A report detailed the Lawrenceville school district's creation of a curriculum for a virtual school to cater to the increasing number of parents who home school their children. * Transportation – Area transportation planners studied commuter rail options to ease congestion along Interstate 70. A list of WDAF's local interest news stories is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Breaking News Updates WDAF broke into and/or preempted regularly-scheduled programming hundreds of times during the period covered by this report in order to bring its viewers breaking news or disaster information.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Academic Benefits of Unschooling
    Retrieved: https://www.todaysparent.com/family/parenting/academic-benefits-of-unschooling/ 11 academic benefits of unschooling In Unschooling to University, Judy Arnall, a parenting expert and ‘unschooler’ to five kids, makes the case for ditching the classroom. By Judy Arnall October 1, 2019 Photo: iStockPhoto Many people ask, “How do kids pick up 12 grades of knowledge if they don’t go to school or homeschool?” The answer is that children acquire knowledge through play, projects, volunteering, field trips and everyday life. They don’t need to “catch up” because they are learning in a different way and much of it is invisible. When they get older, they may switch to a different track; one where all that accumulated knowledge is proven with gradable output such as exams, essays, presentations, and research projects. Here are 11 academic benefits that unschooling provides: 1. Critical thinking is encouraged Large bureaucracies do not handle questioning well. They operate, by their very nature, on the contingent of obedience. If there are too many disrupters, they get bogged down and lose time and efficiency. Critical thinkers are disruptive because they interrupt the prescribed flow of content delivery. Classroom dissenters are often dealt with by being sent to detention or shamed into silence. All children should be critical thinkers. They should respectfully question everything they don’t understand, from content to rules and regulations. Critical thinking is about gathering information, exposing embedded values and assumptions, breaking down data, and analyzing arguments. Unschooling promotes questions without punishment. 2. Problem solving is encouraged When schools have problems, teachers, principals, and support staff are expected to solve them.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Education
    BEYOND EDUCATION BEYOND EDUCATION RADICAL STUDYING FOR ANOTHER WORLD Eli Meyerhof UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PRESS Minneapolis · London An earlier version of chapter 5 was originally published as Erin Dyke and Eli Mey- erhof, “Toward an Anti- and Alter- University: Thriving in the Mess of Studying, Organizing, and Relating with ExCo of the Twin Cities,” in Out of the Ruins: The Emergence of Radical Informal Learning Spaces, ed. Robert H. Haworth and John M. Elmore, 174– 94 (Oakland, Calif.: PM Press, 2017). Copyright 2019 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechani- cal, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 Minneapolis, MN 55401- 2520 http://www.upress.umn.edu Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper The University of Minnesota is an equal- opportunity educator and employer. 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Meyerhof, Eli, author. Title: Beyond education : radical studying for another world / Eli Meyerhof. Description: Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, [2019] | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Identifiers: LCCN 2018055523 (print) | ISBN 978-1-5179-0202-5 (hc) | ISBN 978-1-5179-0203-2 (pb) Subjects: LCSH: Education, Higher—Aims and objectives—United States. | Education, Higher—Economic aspects—United States. | Education, Higher— Political aspects—United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Education and Our World
    39229-106263 EdRev NL.indd 1 3/23/11 10:48 AM 39229-106263 EdRev NL.indd 2 3/23/11 10:48 AM The Alternative Education Resource Organization (AERO) was founded in 1989 by Jerry Mintz. AERO is a branch of the School of Living, a non-profit organization founded in Contents 1934 by Ralph Borsodi. AERO’s goal is to advance student- BEING THERE driven, learner-centered approaches to education. AERO is with Jerry Mintz. page 2 considered by many to be the primary hub of communica- FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK tions and support for educational alternatives around the by Ron Miller. page 3 world. Education Alternatives include, but are not limited to, Montessori, Waldorf (Steiner), Public Choice and At-Risk, FEATURED ARTICLES Democratic, Homeschool, Open, Charter, Free, Sudbury, The World Becomes What You Teach Holistic, Virtual, Magnet, Early Childhood, Reggio Emilia, by Zoe Weil . page 4 Indigo, Krishnamurti, Quaker, Libertarian, Independent, At the Least, Do No Harm: A Polemic Against Schooling Progressive, Community, Cooperative, and Unschooling. One by John Taylor Gatto . page 6 of AERO’s areas of expertise is democratic process and demo- “You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train”: cratic education, but equally important is the networking of Reflecting on What It Means to Educate Students to all forms of educational alternatives. It is through our work Become Democratic, Global Citizens in the 21st Century and mission that we hope to create an education revolution. by Dave Lehman . page 9 AERO’s mission is to help create an education revolution to Bringing Democracy to Education make student-centered alternatives available to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LIFE of JOHN HOLT Arvind Gupta There Is Hardly a Teacher In
    THE LIFE OF JOHN HOLT Arvind Gupta There is hardly a teacher in America who would not know John Holt’s name. His first book How Children Fail sounded an alarm for the modern school system and helped launch the educational reform movement. John Holt talked little about his own education. He wrote a dozen books on education which honed the sensitivities of two generations of teachers and parents. He was a very keen observer of children and whatever he saw happen in the classroom he would write in his diary. It is the collation of these memos which constituted his first book How Children Fail . He wrote: Most children in school fail. They fail because they are Afraid (A), Bored (B) and Confused (C). They are afraid above all else of failing, of disappointing or displeasing the many anxious adults around them, whose limitless hopes and aspirations for them hang over their heads like a cloud. They are bored because the things they are told to do in school are so trivial, so dull and make limited demands on the wide spectrum of their intelligence, capabilities and talents. They are confused because most of the torrent of words that pour over them in school makes little or no sense. It often flatly contradicts other things they have been told, and hardly ever has any relation to what they really know – to the tough model of reality that they carry in their minds. How Children Fail became an educational best seller. Twenty years back it was translated and published in Hindi by Eklavya – a group based in Madhya Pradesh and working for educational reforms.
    [Show full text]